Microstructure Characteristics of Steel
Microstructure Characteristics of Steel
FOUNDING EDITOR
Geoffrey Boothroyd
Boothroyd Dewhurst, Inc.
Wakefield. Rhode Island
Vladimir B. Ginzburg
International Rolling Mill Consultants
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
v~ CRC PressTaylor&FrancisGroup
Boca Raton London New York
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and
information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and
publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission
to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in
any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S . Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic,
mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please accesswww.copyright.com(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact
the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that
provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of
payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation
without intent to infringe.
During the last several decades, the concept of metallurgical design has been applied to the
development of flat-rolled steel products to obtain an optimum combination oftheir mechanical and
manufacturing properties. The desired steel properties are achieved by the proper selection of steel
chemical composition in combination with the selection of an optimal processing route that may
include steelmaking, casting, slab reheating, hot rolling, cooling, cold rolling, annealing and other
heat treatment processes. In his previous three books Steel-Rolling Technology: Theory and
Practice, High-Quality Steel Rolling: Theory and Practice, and Flat Rolling Fundamentals, the
author outlined the state-of-the-art in the development of technology for rolling of flat rolled
products with the required geometrical parameters. This book is mainly concerned with metallurg-
ical aspects of rolling of flat steel products and obtaining the steels with the required combination
of mechanical properties. Metallurgical design of steels processed in rolling mills is frequently
assisted by computer modeling, allowing one to reduce the number of trials prior to obtaining a steel
with desired properties. In application to a particular rolling mill, these computer models may assist
in achieving two principal objectives: further improvement in the properties of the products that are
currently produced by the mill, and the development of new products with required properties that
can be produced by the rolling mill.
To accomplish these two objectives, the computer model must have the following attributes:
• Capability to take into consideration the limits imposed by either current or potentially
upgraded capacity of a rolling mill
• Capability to be accurately calibrated to simulate the evolution of microstructure and
properties for the products currently produced by a rolling mill
• Capability in extrapolation, i.e. the capability to be accurate in predicting the evolution of
microstructure and properties for new products and rolling conditions different from those
that existed during the calibration of the model.
To take into account the limits imposed by mill capacity, one can readily adapt the rolling
process models for hot strip and plate mills that have already been developed during the past several
decades. Besides defining mill limits for rolling a newly developed product, rolling process models
can also calculate the input parameters needed by a metallurgical model, such as rolled material
temperature, strain, strain rate, and process time. Calibration of the rolling process models is usually
PREFACE
accomplished with high accuracy. This is due to the fact that the parameters used by these models
are measured in real time not only during a final rolling stage but also during most of the
intermediate stages of the rolling process, providing a viable information for improving their
accuracy. Unfortunately, this is not the case with metallurgical models. In these models, the most
critical parameters, such as phase composition, grain size, and mechanical properties, cannot be
measured during intermediate or final stages of a rolling process, and are usually measured much
later by using laboratory test equipment.
This fact makes calibration of the metallurgical models much more difficult. This problem can
be alleviated by reducing the number of variables that are used by the metallurgical model to
describe the intermediate stages of rolling process. This, however, must be done with great care in
order to avoid the omission of some essential physical processes that must be included to assure
extrapolating properties of the model.
In the most general case, the Metallurgical Design Model includes five main components:
The first three models have been developed during the last three decades. They were used
successfully in off-line computer models for designing new rolling mills, upgrading and optimizing
operating practices of existing rolling mills, and also for mill online control systems. All this was
accomplished in application to a great variety of steels and exotic alloys, including superalloys that
are several times harder to roll than low carbon steel. Microstructural evolution model and steel
properties model are the latest additions that will extend the application of computer modeling to
designing steels with desired mechanical properties.
It is commonly accepted that the metallurgical model must describe the following principal
physical processes that occur during hot rolling of steels:
Ultimately, the model must establish the relationship between the properties ofthe produced steel
and the microstructure obtained at the end of the rolling process, and, in some cases, after a
subsequent heat treatment. This task is overwhelming. Fortunately, in the process of developing
a metallurgical model, one can make use of a wealth of information available nowadays regarding
both theoretical and experimental research in metallurgical aspects of hot rolling process. In doing
PREFACE
so, however, one must overcome some difficulties in applying this information because of a variety
oftheoretical assumptions and experimental conditions that were used by different research workers,
explaining appreciable differences between their results obtained for the same types of steels.
Adding to this confusion are the various forms of equations developed by different research workers
to describe the same physical phenomenon.
This book outlines the basic principles of metallurgical design that are currently used in
application to flat-rolled steel products. The author reduced some known equations describing the
same physical phenomena to common general forms. The obtained algorithms take into account the
variables used by many research workers, thus simplifying the process of objective comparison of
their equations. The results of this comparison are mostly applied to the plain C-Mn and some
microalloyed steels. They indicate a substantial disagreement between different research workers
regarding to the quantitative effects of various material and process parameters on both the
microstructural evolution and the properties of produced steels. However, there is a certain
consensus regarding the qualitative effects of these parameters. This opens the way for further
perfection ofknown algorithms applicable to the plain C-Mn and some microalloyed steels, and also
for the development of algorthims applicable to other types of steels, including extra and ultra low
carbon steels, ferritic steels, bainitic steels, multiphase steels, and the steels for various special
applications.
During the last several decades, significant progress has been made in the accumulation of
knowledge related to the microstructural evolution in flat-rolled steel products. The process was
described not only in physically-based qualitative terms, but also, for some steels, in quantitative
terms. A wealth of experimental data was produced based on both laboratory and mill production
tests. The state-of-the-art in this area, however, has not reached the point when it becomes possible
to develop a universal model that is applied to any required combination ofproperties of steels, wide
range of possible steel chemical compositions, and subjected to every known thermomechanical
process. To this date, practically viable models for metallurgical design have been developed only
in application to the limited groups of steels produced by narrowly defined thermomechanical
processes. A further expansion of application of these models to a wider range of steel grades
requires further accumulation ofknowledge that is concerned with the microstructural evolution in
flat-rolled steel products. The author hopes that this book will be helpful in this challenging
endeavor.
The author thanks his former and current colleagues who worked with him during the last three
decades on the development of computer models for simulation of rolling conditions in both hot and
cold mills. My special gratitude goes to my wife Tatyana for her great contribution in preparing this
book and her constant encouragement and support.
VLADIMIR B. GINZBURG
CONTENTS
Preface lll
Nomenclature ..............................................627
Principal Works Consulted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .643
Index ................... ...................... . ................... . 719
Part I - Main Characteristics of Steel
Chapter 1
MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS
OF METALS
1.1 Space Lattices
Substances can exist in either an amorphous or crystalline state. In the amorphous state, elemen-
tary particles are intermixed in a disorderly manner; their positions are not fixed relative to those of
their neighbors. In the crystalline state, this substance consists of atoms, or more properly ions,
which are arranged according to a regular geometric pattern that can vary from one substance to
another.
Fig. 1.1 - Principal types of crystal lattices. Adapted from Higgins [1].
All metals are crystalline in nature. The crystallization of metals occurs during solidification
when the atoms of a liquid metal assemble themselves in an orderly arrangement and form a
definite space pattern known as a space lattice. There are several types oflattices in which metal-
lic atoms can arrange themselves upon solidification. The three most common crystal lattices are
shown in Fig. 1.1 and are known as [ 1]:
1
2 MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACFERISTICS OF MEI'ALS
u c =Lattice constant
Positive ions . . . . . . • • •
. :_
•
e
~··-: .. ~.....--/
•
. . .. . . . . /
•
• • .. • • ~ Elecion cloud
. •••••••••
. . . . . .. .
.
Fig. 1.3- Diagrammatic representation of a metallic bond. Adapted from Higgins [1).
allotropic change. The allotropic forms of iron are temperature dependent as illustrated in Table
1.1. When there is an allotropic change from a body-centered to a face-centered cubic lattice, it is
accompanied by a marked quantitative change in the characteristics and properties of the metal
involved. The allotropic change in the density of iron is shown in Fig. 1.4 [1,3].
Crystallographic
I Temperature
Allotropic
Forms
I Forms Range
12.6
12.4
<
l
~5 12.2
Delta ron
0
Q)
E
:g
::I
12.0
Gamma iron
Fig. 1.4- Allotropic changes in the density of iron. Adapted from Higgins [1 ).
(001) z z
y (010)
(110) z (101) z (011)
z
~
"'
)
L.-
t7
y y
z (111)
Fig. 1.5- Atomic planes in a cubic cell. Adapted from Sauveur [2].
point (Fig. 1.7). This is due to the fact that the amount of internal heat relieved during·the crystal-
lization process is equal to the amount of heat given up by the material. The latter is known as the
latent heat of solidification [1].
(100)
Drection of lowest
strength
a) b)
Time
Fig. 1.7- Typical cooling curve of a pure metal. Adapted from Higgins (1).
cation is complete. The remaining liquid is used to thicken the existing dendrite arms leading to an
irregular overall shape of the crystals (Fig. 1.9d). An impure metal (Fig. 1.9e) carries the impuri-
ties between the dendrite arms, thus revealing the initial skeleton.
SecondlfY axis
TemlfY axis
~
Heat dissipation
and crystal ~wth
a)
e)
Fig. 1.9- Dendrite growth of metallic crystals from liquid state. From Higgins [1].
metal about three atoms thick exists at the crystal boundaries, in which the atoms do not conform
to any pattern as illustrated in Fig. 1.10 [ 1,6].
Grain boundsy
(about 3 atoms thick)
Chill IT&ins
Comparator chart method - This method involves a comparison of the observed grain size
with a series of standard charts showing a range of different grain sizes. Each of grain sizes is
associated with an ASTM grain size number G. Figure 1.12 shows an example of an ASTM grain
size chart. The ASTM grain size number is an arbitrary exponential number G that refers to the
mean number of grains per square inch N at a magnification of x 100 diameters according to the
following equation [2, 7]:
N = 2G- 1 (1-1)
Thus, for an ASTM grain size of G = 1, there will be one grain per square inch as seen at a magni-
fication of x 100 diameters, or 1OOx 100 grains per square inch at a magnification of x 1 (real size).
Similarly, for an ASTM grain size of G = 8, there will be 128 grains per square inch as seen at a
magnification of x 100 diameters, or 120 x 104 grains per square inch at a magnification of x 1.
The Heyn intercept method - This method of evaluation of the grain size is most commonly
used whenever it is required to establish the quantitative relationships between the grain size and
mechanical or other properties of metals. The method involves counting the number of grain
boundaries intersected by a straight line of a given length imposed on a metallographic image. The
ASTM Standard E112 recommends to use the length of the intercept sufficient to include at least
50 grains. It is also recommended by this Standard, that for a non-equiaxed structure, the measure-
ments shall be made along the three principal axes of the specimen, longitudinal, transverse and
MICROSTRUCIURAL CHARACIERISTICS OF METALS 9
normal. Alternatively, the circular intercepts shall be employed to produce an average intercept
length that could be useful for the prediction of grain boundary area per unit volume.
Fig. 1.12- ASTM grain size chart. Adapted From Johnson and Weeks [7].
Jeffries' planimetric method - This method is similar to the comparator method. However,
unlike to the comparator method that uses a derivative number for evaluation of the grain size, this
method defines directly the number of grains per square millimeter. According to this method, a
circle or rectangle of known area, usually 5000 mm2, imposed on micrograph or ground glass
screen. The magnification ofthe microscopic image is adjusted to give at least 50 grains within the
area. The number of grains intersected by the perimeter of the area are counted as half grains and
these are added to the grains contained entirely within the area.
The number of grains per square millimeter nA can be expressed by:
10 MICROSTRUCFURAL CHARACI'ERISTICS OF METALS
NM 2
n =-- (1-2)
A 5000
where
N = the number of grains counted
M = the linear magnification.
Table 1.2 Relationship between various types of presentation of the grain size. Abbreviated by
Gladman [8] from ASTM E112.
Reference direction
___ l__
Fig. 1.13 - Feret diameter of the polygonal planar intersection of a grain.
Adapted from Gladman [8].
MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF METALS 11
The nominal diameter dn is defined as the geometric mean of the mean linear intercept and the
Feret diameter, i.e.:
d, =g (1-3)
The Feret diameter d1 is defined as the distance between two parallel lines, tangential to
opposite edges ofthe grain section, that are parallel to the line of intersection used in measuring the
mean linear intercept as shown in Fig. 1.13.
The mean linear intercept i is derived from the average grain intercept area by assuming a
circular grain of average area, having a diameter d, so i = 1td/4.
Table 1.2 and Fig. 1.13 show the relationship between various types of presentation ofthe grain
SIZe.
e1 = ( ~}100% ---
700
rn
(1-4)
where
ei relative error of the mean linear intercept, %
=
Ei = absolute error of the mean linear intercept.
Conversely, ifthe relative error of measurement e; is specified then the minimum number of the
intercepts required to achieve this accuracy can be calculated from the equation:
4900
n = =
2 (1-5)
et
Table 1.3 and Fig. 1.15 give the relationship between the minimum number of measured intercepts
n required to be within the relative error of measurement e; as calculated from Eq. (1-5).
12 MICROSTRUCIVRAL CHARACFERISTICS OF METALS
1
5.0
N~mb~of intercepts I 4900 1225 544 l -;; - 196 -
When an alloy contains more than one ofthese phases, it is generally referred to as an aggregate.
The important compound that is present in the alloys of iron and carbon is the carbide Fe3C or
cementite, which has an orthorhombic space lattice.
• Substitutional solid solution - A solid alloy in which the solute atoms replace some
atoms in the space lattice of the solvent as shown in Fig. 1.14a.
• Interstitial solid solution - A solid alloy in which the solute atoms are located at
random except at the lattice points within the space lattice as shown in Fig. 1.14b.
a) b)
Fig. 1.14- Space lattices of: a) substitutional solid solution, b) interstitial solid solution.
Liquid solution
Solid solution
0 20 40 60 80 100
A 8
Percentage of 8
Fig. 1.15- Phase diagram of A-8 alloy. Adapted from Johnson and Weeks (7].
Phase diagrams are also known as equilibrium or constitutional diagrams. In a phase diagram
the temperature is plotted vertically while the composition is plotted horizontally. Any point on
14 MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MEI'ALS
the diagram represents a definite composition of a constituent and its temperature, with each value
being found by projecting to the proper reference axes. For illustration, Fig. 1.15 shows the
changes that take place during the cooling of an alloy that contains 50% element A and 50%
element B [7]. The alloy remains a homogeneous liquid solution until the temperature drops to the
value indicated by the intersection of the liquidus line at c0• The crystals which form from the 50-
50 liquid consist of a solid solution, the composition of which is found on the solidus line at c 1,
80% element B and 20% element A. As the mass cools, the composition of the growing crystals
changes along the solidus line from c 1 to c?, while the remaining liquid alloy varies in composition
along the liquidus line from c0 to c4 •
Figure 1.16 illustrates the iron-cementite phase diagram which is also known as the iron-
carbon phase diagram.
3000
1600
Molten alloy
1400
2500
1200
Austenite LL
Austenite, ledeburite, 0
and cementite
{
E
Alpha iron ~ gamma ron ~
Perlite Perlite
"'C Cementite, peeriite,
and and
ferrite j .!!
'i cementite
and transformed ledeburite
w 8.
~
200
0~--._--~~--._--~----~--~----~--~~~~~
o.s 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 4.0
cnon,%
1.19 Austenite
In iron-carbon alloys, austenite is the solid solution that is formed when carbon dissolves in face-
centered cubic (gamma) iron in amounts of up to 2%. The microstructure of austenite is usually
large grained as shown in Fig. 1.17.
Austenite is a difficult structure to retain at room temperature unless the steel contains a large
percentage of alloys, such as manganese or chromium. Austenitic steel is characterized by high
tensile strength and great ductility. The tensile strength is often around 125,000 lb/in. 2 with an
elongation in 2 in. of 35 to 40% [3,9].
1.20 Ferrite
In iron-carbon alloys, ferrite is a very dilute solid solution of carbon in a body-centered cubic
(alpha) iron and contains at most only 0.02% carbon. Figure 1.18 shows that the microstructure of
ferrite appears as polyhedral grains. Ferrite is very ductile and soft with a low tensile strength of
16 MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF METALS
Fig. 1.18- Microstructure of ferrite (Magnification: x100) having a coarse grain size.
From The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel [3]. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA.
Reprinted with permission.
1.21 Graphite
Graphite, or graphitic carbon is a free carbon in steel or cast iron where the carbon is amorphous,
having no particular form. Figure 1.19 illustrates the metallographic appearance of graphite in a
low-carbon steel that has been subjected to prolonged heating at a temperature below that at which
austenite is formed [3].
1.22 Cementite
Cementite, or iron carbide is an interstitial compound of iron and carbon with the approximate
chemical formula Fe3C that contains 6.69% carbon. When cementite occurs as a phase in steel, the
chemical composition is altered by the presence of manganese and other carbide-forming elements.
In the case of a slow cooled, relatively high-carbon steel, the microstructure of cementite
appears as a brilliant white network around the pearlite colonies or as needles interspersed with
pearlite as shown in Fig. 1.20a. Figure 1.20b shows the metallographic appearance of spheroidized
cementite in a steel which was heated to a temperature just below that at which austenite first
forms.
Cementite is a very hard compound with a tensile strength of approximately 5,000 lb/in. 2 and
an elongation in 2 in. that is equal to zero. Cementite is an unstable phase which over sufficient
time, decomposes into the two complete equilibrium constituents, iron and graphite [3,9] .
MICROSTRUCIVRAL CHARACTERISTICS OF METALS 17
• ,
,,
·-
"
.: • •• •
..
- '
...
~.t
~
......
' ,. '
..
'~
•
• • " •
Fig. 1.19- Micrograph showing graphite particles in low carbon steel (Magnification:
x 100). From The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel [3). Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh,
PA. Reprinted with permission.
a) b)
Fig. 1.20- Microstructures of (Magnification: x1000): a) slow-cooled high carbon steel showing pearlite
with cementite in the grain boundaries, b) spheroidized cementite in a matrix of ferrite. From The
Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel [3]. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA. Reprinted with permission.
18 MICROSTRUCI'URAL CHARACI'ERJSTJCS OF METALS
1.23 Pearlite
Pearlite is a lamellar aggregate of ferrite and cementite that is a result of the eutectoid reaction
which takes place when a plain carbon steel of approximately 0.08% carbon is cooled slowly from
the temperature range at which austenite is stable.
Fig. 1.21- Microstructure of pearlite (Magnification: x1000). From The Making, Shaping
and Treating of Steel [3). Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA. Reprinted with permission.
Fig. 1.22- Microstructure of ledeburite (Magnification: x150). From The Making, Shaping and
Treating of Steel [3]. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA. Reprinted with permission.
MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MEI'ALS 19
Figure 1.21 shows the lamellar micrographic structure ofpearlite that is known as the eutectoid
structure. Pearlite exerts the maximum hardening power of any constituent and has a tensile
strength of approximately 125,000 lb/in. 2 and an elongation in 2 in. of 10% [3,9].
1.24 Ledeburite
Ledeburite is an eutectic in the iron-carbon system, the constituents being an austenite and a
cementite. The eutectic contains 4.3% carbon. It is a constituent of iron-carbon alloys containing
more than 2% carbon and for this reason the dividing line between steels and cast iron is set at 2%
carbon. Fig.1.22 illustrates the microstructure of ledeburite in cast iron [3].
Accm in hypereutectoid steel, critical temperature, at which the solution ofcementite in austenite
=
y is completed during heating
Ac1 critical temperature at which austenite y begins to form during heating
Ac3 = critical temperature at which transformation of ferrite a to austenite y is completed during
heating
Ac4 = critical temperature at which austenite y transforms to delta iron oduring heating
Ae1 = critical temperature in equilibrium diagram at which either austenite y begins to form
during heating, or austenite y transforms completely to ferrite a (or to ferrite a plus
cementite) during cooling
Ae temperatures of phase changes at equilibrium
Aecm = in hypereutectoid steel, critical temperature in equilibrium diagram, at which either the
solution of cementite in austenite y is completed during heating or precipitation of
cementite starts during cooling
Ae3 = critical temperature in equilibrium diagram corresponding to a complete transition either
from ferrite a to austenite yon heating or from austenite y to ferrite a on cooling
Ae4 = critical temperature in equilibrium diagram at which either austenite y transforms to delta
ferrite oduring heating or delta iron otransforms to austenite y during cooling
Arcm = in hypereutectoid steel, critical temperature, at which precipitation of cementite starts
during cooling
Ar1 = critical temperature at which transformation of austenite y to ferrite a (or to ferrite a plus
cementite) is completed during cooling
Ar3 = critical temperature at which austenite y begins to transform to ferrite a during cooling
Ar4 = critical temperature at which delta iron otransforms to austenite y during cooling.
Critical temperatures Ar1 and Ar3 decrease with the increase of cooling rates (Table 1.4).
20 MICROSTRUCI'URAL CHARACI'ERISTICS OF METALS
Table 1.4 Critical temperatures Ar1 ec) at various cooling rates (11].
Chemical composition, wt% ArJAr1 Cooling rate, °C/s
oc
c Mn Si p s AI Nb v 0.05 0.08 1.3 9.9
--
0.15 1.42 0.37 0.023 0.009 0.052 0.031 - Ar3 770 755 740
Ar1 650 635 -
0.15 1.39 0.39 0.016 0.009 0.039 0.046 0.046 Ar3 770 750 730 -
Ar, 645 635 620
Eutectic L-+a+~
? ~
at +P
<p
Eutectoid y-+o:+~
? ~
0: +~
<p
1 <p
at+ p
Peritectoid
7v\
o:+~-+y
\ '\L
~
a. +L
Peritectic a+L-+~
(;\
~~
Monotectic Lt-+~+a.
/ at+Lz (a
Fig. 1.23 - Types of three-phase reactions in metals. Adapted from
Flemings [12].
Eutectic - Liquid solution L is converted into two or more solids a, ~ •... that are intimately
mixed on cooling.
Eutectoid - Solid solution y is converted into two or more intimately mixed solids a, ~ •...
MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MEFALS 21
Molten alloy
1520
(.)
0
~e.· 1480
I
tE
Gl
I
I
1440
1-
I
Delta ron I
and austenite I Austenite
1400
I
I
I
1~~~----~~~~~----~~----~~----~~----._~----._~
Fig. 1.24 - Phase diagram related to peritectic steel. Adapted from Porter and Easterling [13).
0.40% carbon is completely austenitic as shown in Fig 1.25a. On slow cooling below Ae3, the
austenite first rejects ferrite which concentrates at the grain boundaries (Fig. 1.25b).
As the temperature falls down to Ae1, the crystals of austenite shrink as shown in Fig. 1.25c and
their carbon content increases to 0.80%. On cooling below Ae1, the austenite changes to pearlite so
that the final constituents in steels below Ae 1 are ferrite and pearlite as illustrated in Fig. 1.25d [1].
Fig. 1.25- Phase transformation in steel containing 0.4% carbon. Adapted from Higgins [1].
900
(.)
0
ef
.aIll
800
l Austenite + Cementite
!
700 Ferrite
Ae 1 Ae1-3
Peaiite + Cementite
1100 .-------------------------------------------~
Austenite
Ferrite
1000 Cementite
Peaiite
900
(.)
0
Austenite
700
600
Ferritl!l
Ae1
Ferrite + Peaiite
•.
,
~ ~ e) :
cf Peaiite + Cementite
Fig. 1.27- Phase transformation in steel containing 1.2% carbon. Adapted from Higgins [1).
24 MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MEIALS
As a result the carbon content in an austenite will be gradually reduced down to 0.80% at the
temperature Ae 1_3• Below this point, the remainin'g austenite will then transform to pearlite as
shown in Fig. 1.27d [1].
1700 t-----1~--+---4---.....f...---1---~
G
• AD, andP/1 900
• Other data
860
0
0
780
740
-·
1300 ......__.......,._ _ PI, _ _.,__~1---4- tv, """'"---1 700
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Cerbon,%
Fig. 1.28- Phase transformation temperature in steels. Adapted from Krauss [14]
The last equation takes into account the interactions between alloy elements.
1.33 Bainite
Bainite is a decomposition of austenite consisting of an aggregate of ferrite and carbide. Figure
1.29 shows the appearance of bainite as feather like if formed in the upper part of the temperature
range and acicular if formed in the lower part. The hardness of bainite increases as the transforma-
tion temperature decreases due to the finer distribution of carbide that forms at lower temperatures.
In a given steel, the bainitic microstructure will generally be found to be both harder and
tougher than pearlite, although the hardness will be lower than that of martensite [3].
1.34 Martensite
Martensite is an interstitial supersaturated solid solution of carbon in iron having a body-centered
tetragonal lattice. It is a metastable phase of steel that is formed by the transformation of austenite
below the M5 temperature.
Transformation to martensite occurs almost instantly during cooling and the percentage of
transformation is dependent only on the finish cooling temperature. Martensite is the hardest of the
transfonnation products of austenite. It has either acicular or needlelike microstructure.
26 MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF METALS
Fig. 1.29- Electron micrograph (Magnification: x15,000) of bainitic microstructure formed on complete
transformation of eutectoid steel at 260"C (500"F). From The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel [3].
Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA. Reprinted with permission.
Fig. 1.30- Electron micrograph (Magnification: x15,000) of the structure of tempered martensite at a
tempering temperature of 595"C (1100"F). From The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel (3).
Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA. Reprinted with permission.
MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF METALS 27
Figure 1.30 shows the microstructure ofthe so called tempered martensite, which is formed when
martensite is reheated to a subcritical temperature after quenching [3].
Stable austenite
-- 723°C-------------
700
600
500
(.) 400
si.
0
Acicular
E - · M. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~ 200
100
Austenite + Mnnsite
0
- MF ___ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-100
Martensite
10 100 1000
Time, s (logarithmic scale)
I
0
E
~
Fig. 1.32- The relationship between T.T.T. and continuous cooling curves.
Adapted from Higgins [1).
annealing process also produces a uniform microstructure of ferrite and pearlite [14].
"C "F
1600 2912
1500 2732
1400 2552
1300 2372
!e 1200 2192
Acm
2012
1100
e8. 1000 1832
~
900 1652
800 1472
700 1292
600 1112
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Carbon content in weight percent
Fig. 1.33- Portion of the Fe-C diagram showing temperature ranges for full annealing, normalizing,
hot working and homogenizing. From Principles of Heat Treatment of Steel, by G. Krauss [14], ASM
International, 1980. With permission.
Austempering Bainite
~ ·
-- f- -
process consists of heating at a relatively high temperature in the austenitic region so that a full
carbide solution is obtained. This is followed by slow cooling which produces a complete transfor-
mation in the high-temperature end ofthe pearlite range as shown in Fig. 1.35. Though the process
is considered to be simple and reliable for most steels, it is rather slow and requires a significant
amount of time to cool the material from the austenizing temperature to room temperature
"C "F
1100 , . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . , . . . . . - , 2012
1000 1832
1652
j
900
800
e8. 700
~
600
500 932
CONVENTIONAL ANNEALING
Fig. 1.35- Schematic transformation diagram for full annealing. From The Mak-
ing, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 1985 [3). Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA.
Reprinted with permission.
MICROSTRUCTVRAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MEFALS 31
ISOTHERMAL ANNEALING
1.40 Normalizing
Normalizing is a heat treatment process that is similar to full annealing and having a main objec-
tive of producing a uniform microstructure of ferrite and pearlite. Another objective of normaliz-
ing is to refine the grain size, which frequently becomes very coarse during hot working or is
present in steel casting [3,14].
32 MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MEI'ALS
Normalizing in hypoeutectoid steels is performed at temperatures that are higher than those
used for annealing. Hypereutectoid steels are heated above the temperature Acm as was shown in
Fig.l.33. Figure 1.37 shows that for both hypoeutectoid and hypereutectoid steels, heating is
followed by air cooling, which provides a much faster cooling rate in comparison with that of full
annealing. As the cooling rate increases, the temperature range over which ferrite and pearlite are
being formed is lowered, resulting in a more refined microstructure of the product. Consequently,
the product would have higher strength and hardness along with lower ductility.
AcJ
Ac1
...:I
G)
......as
8.
E
~
Time
Fig. 1.37 - Schematic time-temperature cycles for normalizing and full annealing.
From Principles of Heat Treatment of Steel, by G. Krauss [14], ASM International,
1980. With permission.
.........as
Q)
:I
8.
E
~
Ferrite
and
carbide
Time
1.41 Spheroidizing
Spheroidized microstructures in steels consist of spherical carbide particles that are uniformly
dispersed in a ferrite matrix as shown in Fig. 1.20b. The spheroidized microstructure is the most
stable microstructure in steels and provides for improved ductility, which is important for low and
medium-carbon steels. This type of microstructure is also used to obtain a lower hardness, which
is important for high-carbon steels that undergo machining prior to final hardening [3,14].
Spheroidizing can be accompanied by either complete or partial austenizing with a subsequent
holding just above the critical temperature Act and then cooling very slowly through the Act (Fig.
1.38}, or cycling above and below Act. Spheroidizing of martensite microstructures is frequently
performed on highly alloyed tool steels that form martensite on air cooling.
1.42 Homogenizing
Homogenizing is a type of annealing treatment that is usually performed in the earlier stages of
steel processing prior to hot rolling or forging [15]. The main purpose of homogenizing is to
obtain uniformity or homogeneity of austenite, which improves the hot workability and helps the
product to obtain a uniform microstructure during subsequent annealing or hardening operations.
Homogenizing is usually performed at high temperatures in the austenitic phase field as shown
in Fig. 1.33, to speed up the reduction of segregation or chemical concentrations that are produced
during the solidification of an ingot or slab. At these high temperatures, second phases such as
carbides are also most fully dissolved.
ductility. The tempering operation should immediately follow quenching in order to minimize
cracking as shown in Fig. 1.39.
CUSTOMARY QUENCHING
AND TEMPERING
Fig. 1.39 - Schematic transformation diagram for quenching and tempenng. From
The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 1985 [3]. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA.
Reprinted with permission.
MARTEMPERING
Tl ME - LOG SCALE
Fig. 1.40 - Schematic transformation diagram for martempering. From The Making,
Shaping and Treating of Steel, 1985 [3]. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA. Reprinted
with permission.
MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACFERISTICS OF MEFALS 35
1.45 Martempering
Martempering is a modified quenching procedure that is used to reduce the high residual stresses
which are usually created during the rapid cooling through the martensite temperature range [3].
This heat treatment is carried out by quenching a workpiece into a molten-salt bath at a tempera-
ture just above the martensite transformation temperature M 5 • The workpiece is held in this bath to
establish a constant temperature throughout the workpiece and then air cooled to room
temperature. As a result, the transformation to martensite occurs during the relatively slow air
cooling process. After martempering, the workpiece can then be tempered to the desired hardness
as shown in Fig. 1.40. Tools, bearings, and dies are examples of the types ofworkpieces that are
usually subjected to martempering.
1.46 Austempering
Austempering is a heat treatment that is used to obtain a lower bainite microstructure which is
similar in strength and superior in ductility to those of tempered martensite [3]. This heat treat-
ment includes quenching to the desired temperature in the lower bainite region, usually in a
molten-salt bath and holding the workpiece at this temperature until the transformation to bainite is
completed (Fig. 1.41 ). After austempering, the workpiece is either quenched or air cooled to room
temperature. The workpiece can also be tempered to a lower hardness level if required.
A major advantage of this process over conventional quenching and tempering is minimum
distortion and the absence of quench cracking. Plain high-carbon steels in small section sizes, such
as sheet, strip, and wire are typical products for austempering.
AUSTEMPERING
"'
a:
::1
~
a:
"'
IL
.......2
PRODUCT: BAINITE
Tl ME - LOG SCALE
Fig. 1.41- Schematic transformation diagram for austempering. From The Mak-
ing, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 1985 [3]. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, PA.
Reprinted with permission.
36 MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF METALS
Case hardening- This is the process that involves a change in the chemical composition of the
surface portion of a workpiece. Variations of this process such as carburizing, nitriding, and
carbonitriding can be utilized as follows:
• Carburizing produces a high-carbon layer at the surface of low-carbon steel by heating
it in contact with either carbonaceous solid material or in a carbon-rich liquid (liquid
carburizing) with subsequent quenching. Depending on the process, the heating tem-
perature varies from 870°C to 1050°C (1600°F to 1920°F).
• Nitriding introduces nitrogen into the surface layer of a solid ferrous alloy by holding it
in contact with nitrogen material. For ferritic steel, the holding temperature is below
theAc 1 temperature and quenching is not usually required. The gas-phase nitronization
treatment is known as bright annealing.
• Carbonitriding combines both carburizing and nitriding processes .
• Quench aging
• Strain aging.
Quench aging - In application to carbon steel, quench aging can be described as a process of
gradual change in steel properties with time after quenching. Quench aging is caused by the
precipitation of carbon, nitrogen, or both from supersaturated solid solution in ferrite. These two
elements occupy interstitial positions in the alpha-iron lattice. Their solubility decreases sharply
with decrease in temperature. In carbon steels, carbon C is the principal agent in quench aging.
After rapid cooling, it can precipitate at ambient or slightly elevated temperatures in the form
of finely dispersed particles of iron carbide. This produces significant changes of the steel proper-
ties, including [3,16]:
a) increased hardness
b) increased yield strength
c) increased tensile strength
d) decreased elongation
e) decreased reduction area in tension test
f) increased transition temperature from ductile to brittle fracture in a notch-impact test
g) increase in coercive magnetic force
h) decrease in magnetic permeability.
Fig. 1.42 - Changes in hardness of 0.06% carbon steel quenched from no•c
(1325"F) after aging at indicated temperatures. From Metals Handbook, Aging of Iron
and Steel, 1948 [16]. Copyright ASM International. Reprinted with permission.
Figure 1.42 shows that hardness increases more rapidly when aging occurs above room temper-
ature, but a higher absolute value of hardness is attained by aging at room temperature. Aging for
periods beyond that corresponding to the maximum hardness results in decrease in hardness. This
phenomenon is known as overaging. In order to reduce quench aging, the carbon and nitrogen
38 MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MEIALS
content in supersaturated solid solutions must be minimized by cooling the steel slowly, especially
through the temperature range from 540°C to 315°C (1 000°F to 600°F). Another method is to
form stable carbides and nitrides by adding alloys to the steel such as titanium or zirconium.
Strain aging- Strain aging differs from quench aging in several ways [3]:
Strain aging is caused by the segregation of interstitial solute atoms of carbon, nitrogen to the
strain fields of dislocations in the alpha-iron lattice. This disrupts the regular periodicity of the
lattice and enlarges the interstitial sites. Subsequently, because the dislocations become 'frozen' in
place, it would require a higher stress to produce the same amount of plastic deformation. Most of
the effects of strain aging on properties of steels are similar to those of quench aging. There is,
however, another unwelcome characteristic of strain aging, related to the abrupt yield point elonga-
tion characteristic of the temper rolled low-carbon steels.
Caused by strain aging, this phenomenon leads to appearance of so called Liider strain lines
after subsequent deformation. Strain aging can occur during the tension test that is conducted
oc
within the temperature range from 150 to 350 °C (from 302 °F to 662 °F). This phenomenon is
known as dynamic strain aging, or blue brittleness. Strain aging is commonly minimized by
removal of nitrogen N. This is frequently accomplished, for instance, by adding aluminum AI to
the steel, so about 0.05% of aluminum is retained in the product, forming aluminum nitride (AlN).
References
1. Higgins, R.A., Engineering Metallurgy, Part 1, Applied Physical Metallurgy, Robert E.
Krieger Publishing Company, Melbourne, Fla., 1983.
2. Sauveur, A., The Metallography and Heat Treatment of Iron and Steel, Fourth Edition,
McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York and London, 1935.
3. The Making, Shaping and Treating ofSteel, 1Oth edition, Eds. Lankford, W.T. et al, Associa-
tion oflron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985.
4. Roberts, W.L., Cold Rolling ofSteel, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1978.
7. Johnson, C.G. and Weeks, W.R., Metallurgy, Fifth Edition, American Technical Society,
MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF METALS 39
Chicago, 1977.
8. Gladman, T., The Physical Metallurgy of Microalloyed Steels, The Institute of Materials,
London, UK, 1997.
9. Keller, J.F., Lectures on Steel and Its Heat Treatment, Evangelical Press, Cleveland, Ohio,
1928.
10. Avner, S.H., Introduction to Physical Metallurgy, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Book
Company, New York, 1974.
11. Andrews, K.W., "Empirical Formulae for the Calculation of Some Transformation Tempera-
tures," Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 203, 1965, pp. 721-727.
13. Porter, D.A. and Easterling, K.E., Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys, Second
Edition, Chapman & Hall, London, 1992.
14. Krauss, G., Principles ofHeat Treatment ofSteel, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio,
1980.
15. Pickering, F.B., Physical Metallurgy and the Design of Steels, Applied Science Publishers,
London, 1978, pp. 1-88.
16. Metals Handbook, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1948, p. 439.
Chapter 2
CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS
OF STEEL
Alloying elements and impurities are incorporated into austenite, ferrite and cementite. If the
alloy or impurity atoms are nearly the same size as the iron atoms, the iron atoms are usually
replaced. If these atoms are significantly smaller than iron atoms, such as nitrogen, the incorpora-
tion may occur by filling in the interstitial sites. In cases when solubility levels are exceeded, other
phases than those in plain carbon steel may form. A typical example is the combination of the
cementite structure M3C (M represents a combination of chromium and iron atoms), that forms
when small amounts of chromium are added to iron-carbon alloys at 890°C (1634°F). Larger
amounts of chromium cause the carbides M 7C3 and M 23 C6 to be formed [2]. Depending on their
effect on the formation and stabilization of phases in steels, the alloying elements are usually
considered as [3,4]:
• Austenite formers
• Ferrite formers
• Carbide formers.
41
42 CHEMICAL COMPOSmONS OF STEEL
• Carbon (C)
• Cobalt (Co)
• Copper (Cu)
• Manganese (Mn)
• Nickel (Ni)
• Nitrogen (N) .
Figure 2.1 illustrates the typical effect of an austenite former on the austenitic field.
I
/ ~ ....
2600
1-' r--.... ...... - I400
.......
2400 I 300
--
~--- ........
...........
.....,
2200 I
29"Y
. 5~
• .., I
~2000 4"Y·~
t; 6. 5~,~ ~/
i 1800
.~,
~
~,
~ /035"f.Mn
.....-::
~ . 5"f.Mn
~K
1600
1400
t'::
,........_ ~~"Y.Mn~ 800
~ Carbon steel, 0.35 "f. Mn
1200
~ t--- ~ 100
\ ~ \6.5 •t. Mn 600
J'<3"Y.Mn
0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Carbon,%
Fig. 2.1 - Effect of several uniform manganese contents on the carbon limitations
for pure austenite at elevated temperatures. From Alloying Elements in Steel, by
Bain, E.C. and Paxton, H.W., Second Edition [3]. Copyright ASM International.
Reprinted with permission.
• Tungsten (W)
• Vanadium (V).
2800
-I 500
2600
/ ......
io-' ......
~~ -I 400
... ...
v 111 ~ V . . ....
/
2400
v ~
I 300
~-2200
.... r-...... u
•;;
I
1200!
1
Er"~~. f""""'...
r>
I
:.
t:7
v
I 'Y....
i2ooo 1100~
I , ,. •
1000!
l Cr ,,
~ 1800
12%
/ Cr -1"% ,
,,'
1600 ~
~ ./ Cr 900
.....
.... , , ..
~
./ ~;:'\
Carbon 11111, 0% Cr 800
1400
........ 700
1200
Fig. 2.2 - Effect of several uniform chromium contents on the carbon limitations
for pure austenite at elevated temperatures. From Alloying Elements in Steel, by
Bain, E.C. and Paxton, H.W ., Second Edition [3). Copyright ASM International.
Reprinted with permission.
Nickel
Silicon
Aluminum Nitrides
Chromium
Tungsten
Molybdenum
Vanadium Nitrides
Titanium Nitrides
Niobium
Lead Pb
Fig. 2.3 - Physical states in which the principal alloying elements exist in steel.
From Engineering Metallurgy, Part 1, by Higgins, R.A., 1983 [5). Reprinted with
permission.
The symbols in Eqs. (2-1) and (2-2) represent the weight percent ofthe element indicated. By
using ASE and FSE as the coordinates in a modified Schaefjler diagram as shown in Fig. 2.4, it is
possible to define the microstructure of alloyed steel after air-cooling from its austenite conditions.
Ac1 COC) =723- 10.7[Mn]- 16.9[Nz1 + 29.1 [Si] + 16.9[Cr] + 290[As] + 6.38[Wj (2-4)
CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS OF STEEL 45
Ar3 eC) = 910- 273 [C]- 14[Mn]- 57[Nz]- 16[Cr]- 9[Mo]- 5[Cu] (2-5)
M,eC) = 539-423 [C]- 30.4[Mn] -11 [Si] -17.7[Nz]-12.1 [Cr] -1.5 [Mo] (2-6)
M,eC) = 512-453 [C] + 217 [C] 2 -71.5 [C] [Mn]- 67.6 [C] [Cr]
(2-7)
+ 15 [Cr] -16.9 [Nz]- 9.5 [Mo]
In the above formulas, the symbols represent the weight percent of the element indicated.
The formulas are applicable for steel containing less than 0.6% C and less than 5% of each of the
other alloying elements. The last equation takes into account the interactions between alloy
elements.
z~ 25
Austenite
Martensite
0 5 10 15 20
Ferrite stabHizing equivalent
(%Cr + %Mo + 1.5 x %Si + 2 x %Nb + 3 x %TI)
Fig. 2.4 - Modified Schaeffler diagram. From Engineering Metallurgy, Part 1, by Higgins,
R.A., 1983 [5]. Reprinted with permission.
The addition of all alloying elements, with the exception of cobalt, results in retardation of the
46 CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS OF STEEL
transformation rates at temperatures between 500°C (932°F) and 700°C (1292°F). Therefore, the
effect of alloying reduces the critical cooling rate that is necessary to obtain martensite [5].
2200
Mol l/w'
v
Ti Vsi
2000
~
~j
f ) I
"'
~1800
•
r ~ ~ ~
/
v
!!1600
v
~
'U Cr ~ ~
..
2u
~ j...--- ~
-
~1400
I~""'
....._
--......;:: r---
r--=::: r--
1200
~ t--...
1000 ~ .. .........
- -........... .....
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 18
Alloyinu element. "Y.
(2-8)
where
h8 = hardenability of base iron-carbon alloy
K 1, K2, Kn = hardenability multiplying factors of alloying elements .
3.5
8.0
3.0
~ 7.0
§ ~
I:J)
2.5 j
c
2-
I:J)
6.0 c
:8- 2-
3 Q.
:e
:::E :::I
2.0 :::E
5.0
1.5
4.0
2.0 4.0
Alloying element %
Fig. 2.6 - Hardenability multiplying factors for a variety of alloying elements. Adapted
from The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel [4).
,,
/si jJn
240
:p
220
v ,.
. ....
I
I
1 / ,
LI
200
~~
I
1
lL v
Ill 180
~Vv
XI
c
Ni,
" ../"_
-
.c
~
I v,' "" ~ ~ v
_1 / ........
~ 140
~ v
I-- ~
f...--
120
100
rjj ," ~ .........:::: ~ v
~ r--
f-""
- -
r-'
rv,~ ~ r---- ~
80 ~- - - -
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Alloying element, %
2.0
I
I
1.8
c I
J Mn
Mo If
1.6
i r/ I .
Cu,-'
,.
LL.
1.4
v ,
.,
l j_ .j Si
• I
p
J
/} V.'
'Q- --- ----
Ni-
~u ,.~_, v
1.2
v
1.0
~~
0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Alloying &Iemen~ %
Fig. 2.8 - Walters' factors for estimating tensile strength of pearlitic steels in the
normalized condition. From Engineering Metallurgy, Part 1, by Higgins, R.A., 1983
[5]. Reprinted with permission.
An increase in tensile strength as a function of the content of the principal alloying elements
can be estimated by using the multiplication factors derived in application to pearlitic steels in the
normalized condition [5], as shown in Fig. 2.8. The multiplication factor equal to 1 corresponds to
a pure iron with a tensile strength of 250 N/mm2 (36,000 psi). The most accurate results are
obtained for steels with less than 0.25% carbon and within the intermediate alloy range.
CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS OF STEEL 49
100
CHANGE 0' SCALE
~
~
.
..
.~ 80
'E
uI
E
&:.
e
·e
u
60
.....
CX)
ID
0
... 40
.::
-;;
·;;;
!
0u
u..
·.:
iij
0
0 4 8 10 20
Alloyino element, •1.
Residual elements such as nickel, copper, molybdenum, chromium, and tin increase the
hardenability of carbon steels and may also change the heat-treating characteristics. In some
applications where ductility is important, this increased hardness can be harmful.
Carbon, sulphur, nitrogen and oxygen are especially harmful in electrical sheet steels because
they occupy interstitial spaces in the crystal structure and, even in small amounts, can cause
significant deterioration ofthe magnetic properties of these steels [10].
Iron oxide is another type of impurity that is formed during the steelmaking process and can be
trapped in solid steel during solidification. These impurities are known as dirt. Oxides which
remain in steel are mechanically mixed with it, breaking up the continuity of the steel structure and
disrupting the directional uniformity of the physical properties of steel. These oxides can also
serve as points of weaknesses from which a fracture may commence.
180 90
300
270
240
2101
cii
180 =
~
I
150
120
10 90
The range of carbon content in various types of steel is shown in Table 2.1 [9].
120,000~~
0.70
0 .60
0.50
it
g040
...
&>
0
u
0 .30
020
0 .10
The range of manganese content in various types of steel is shown in Table 2.2 [9].
The range of molybdenum content in various types of steel is shown in Table 2.3 [9].
The range of chromium content in various types of steel is shown in Table 2.4 [9].
The range of nickel content in various types of steel is shown in Table 2.5 [9].
CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS OF STEEL 55
The range of vanadium content in various types of steel is shown in Table 2.6 [9].
WC, and the double carbide Fe4 WzC. These carbides dissolve very slowly and only at very high
temperatures. Therefore, tungsten is an important constituent of tool steels and particularly high-
speed tool steels. In these steels, a substantial increase in hardness can be achieved after secondary
hardening. As a ferrite former, tungsten lowers the A4 temperature and raises the A3 temperature.
The principal functions of tungsten as an alloying element are as follows [3,5]:
• Inhibits grain growth and therefore has a grain refining effect.
• Reduces decarburization during hot working and heat treatment processes.
• Induces abrasion resistance.
• Develops high-temperature (red) hardness in quenched and tempered steels.
• Contributes to creep strength in some high-temperature alloys.
• Contributes considerably to hardenability.
• Opposes softening in tempering where steels containing tungsten can be heated in the
range 600-700°C (1112-1292°F) before carbides begin to precipitate resulting in soften-
ing the steel.
The range of tungsten content in various carbon and tool steels is shown in Table 2.7 [9) .
I
Type of Steel Tungsten Content (%)
• Promotes high residual induction and high coercive force in permanent-magnet alloys.
• Enhances high strength and considerable toughness by stimulating the precipitation
hardening process.
CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS OF STEEL 57
The range of cobalt content in various steels and superalloys is shown in Table 2.8 [9].
Tool steel:
High-speed steel 0 - 13.0
Hot-work steel 0- 4.5
- - - -- - - r-
Heat-resistant casting alloys:
Nickel-base alloys
Cobalt-base alloys
l1 0 - 18.5
42.0 - 67.5
The ranges of aluminum content in various steels and alloys is shown in Table 2.9 [9].
• Withdraws carbon from solution and reduces martensitic hardness and hardenability in
medium-chromium steels.
• Prevents formation of austenite in high-chromium steels.
• Withdraws carbon from solution in austenitic stainless steels at elevated temperatures
and thereby prevents intergranular deterioration as a result of the chromium-carbide
formation at the grain boundaries with accompanied depletion of local chromium.
• Promotes precipitation hardening in austenitic high-temperature alloys.
• Contributes to malleability in killed high-strength low-alloy steels by making improve-
ments in inclusion characteristics, mainly by rounding the sulphides. The same effect
can be achieved by utilizing zirconium and rare earths.
• Used as a deoxidizer.
The range oftitanium content in various steels and alloys is shown in Table 2.10 [9].
• Produces a rather small increase in yield strength in steels that are not precipitation
hardened.
• Increases hardenability in carbon steels that may result in reduced ductility.
a) b) c)
Fig. 2.12 -a) Segregation of iron sulphide (FeS) at crystal boundaries of steel (Magnification:
750x), b) Formation of isolated manganese sulphide (MnS) globules when manganese is
present in steel (Magnification: 200x), c) Ghost bands or areas lacking in pearlite which
indicates the presence of phosphorus (Magnification: x75). From Engineering Metallurgy, Part
1, by Higgins, R.A., 1983 [5]. Reprinted with permission.
elevated temperatures [4]. Hydrogen, in excess of0.0005%, also contributes to internal cracking
which usually occurs during the cooling of a metal after rolling or forging.
References
1. Peters, A.T., Ferrous Production Metallurgy, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982.
2. Krauss, G., Principles ofHeat Treatment ofStee/, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio,
1980.
3. Bain, E.C. and Paxton, H.W., Alloying Elements in Steel, Second Edition, ASM Interna-
tional, Materials Park, Ohio, 1966.
4. The Making, Shaping and Treating ofSteel, lOth Edition, Eds. Lankford, W.T. et al., Associ-
ation oflron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985.
6. Andrews, K.W., "Empirical Formulae for the Calculation of Some Transformation Tempera-
tures," Journal ofthe Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 203, 1965, pp. 721-727.
7. Shiga, C. et al., Kawasaki Steel Technical Report, No.4, 1981, pp. 97-109.
8. Metals Handbook, Eighth Edition, Vol. 1, Properties and Selection of Metals, ASM
International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1961.
9. ASM Metals Reference Book, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1981.
10. Bozorth, R.M., Ferromagnetism, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Toronto, 1951.
11. Gladman, T., The Physical Metallurgy of Microalloyed Steels, The Institute ofMaterials,
London, England, 1997, pp. 38,39.