Telescope
Telescope
2
1. Structural Ambiguities
The boy saw the man with the telescope.
The boy saw the man with the telescope.
The boy saw the man with the telescope.
3
The boy saw the man with the telescope.
4
The boy saw the man with the telescope.
5
• The boy saw the man with the telescope.
(a) The boy saw the man with the telescope.
(b) The boy saw the man with the telescope.
6
• PS-Rules
1. S → NP VP 8. VP→V
2. NP→ Det N‘ 9. VP→V NP
3. NP→ N‘ 10. VP→V CP
4. NP→ NP's N‘ 11. VP→Aux VP
5. NP→NP PP 12. VP→VP PP
6. N'→Adj N‘ 13. PP→P NP
7. N'→ N 14. CP→C S
7
2. More Structures
1. The dog completely destroyed the shoe.
2. The cat and the dog were friends.
3. The cat is coy.
8
• A. completely: adverb; modifier, sister to VP
9
The dog destroyed the house yesterday.
10
Probably the dog has fleas.
11
B. Coordinate Structure
12
• → How about:
a. Michael writes poetry and surfs.
[VP and VP]
13
C. Adjective
14
D. Other Cases
15
3. Sentence Relatedness
16
3.1 Transformational Rules
The boy is sleeping. Is the boy sleeping?
17
• “Move Aux” transformation rule:
18
Attachment by “Adjunction”
19
• Two Steps in Question-Formation:
20
• Many sentence types are accounted for
by transformation:
21
Other transformations
• Passive
• there-insertion
• PP Preposing
22
• Passive
23
• There-insertion
24
• PP Preposing
25
3.2. Structural Dependency of Rules
• PP-preposing is structure-dependent
26
The boy saw the man with the telescope.
27
The boy saw the man with the telescope.
With the telescope, the boy saw the man.
28
The boy saw the man with the telescope.
*With the telescope, the boy saw the man.
29
※ PP preposing transformation applies to
VP-PP structure, NOT NP-PP structure.
30
• That-omission is structure-dependent.
31
• Agreement
a. This guy seems kind of cute.
b. These guys seem kind of cute.
33
• The guy …… seems kind of cute.
34
• Structure-dependence and movement
35
• Structure-dependence and movement
36
The boy who is sleeping was dreaming.
Was the boy who is sleeping dreaming?
*Is the boy who sleeping was dreaming?
37
4. Further Syntactic Dependencies
(Wh-Questions)
38
>> Omission of wh-phrases?
39
(3)Original sentences:
a. Max will chase what?
b. Pete has put his bone where?
c. You think (that) which dog loves balls?
40
• I wonder who Mary likes. > CP
• Who does Mary like? > CP
41
• Three steps in wh-movement
42
• What will Max chase?
43
• Which dog did Michael feed?
44
"Move wh" rule can move the wh phrase
outside its own clause.
45
1. a. Who did Helen say the senator wanted to hire _____?
46
5. UG Principles and Parameters
47
• Korean does not have wh-movement.
48
• However, wh movement has constraints.
49
3. a. Miss Marple asked Sherlock whether Poirot had solved
the crime.
b. Who did Miss Marple ask _____ whether Poirot had solved
the crime?
c. *Who did Miss Marple ask Sherlock whether _____ had
solved the crime?
d. *What did Miss Marple ask Sherlock whether Poirot had
solved _____?
50
4. a. Sam Spade insulted the fat man's henchman.
b. Who did Sam Spade insult?
c. Whose henchman did Sam Spade insult?
d. *Whose did Sam Spade insult henchman?
51
5. a. John ate bologna and cheese.
b. John ate bologna with cheese.
c. *What did John eat bologna and?
d. What did John eat bologna with?
52
6. Sign Language Syntax
• All sign languages have rules of syntax.
• All sign languages have PS rules that show
hierarchical structure and order constituents.
• ASL has Aux.
53
• ASL has topicalization, which has constraints.
• ASL wh phrases may move or remain in place.
• Sign languages show an interaction of universal and
language-specific properties, just as spoken languages
do.
54
Thank you!
55