Design of Air Conditioning and Ventilation System of The Gymnasium in The Polytechnic University of The Philippines Maragondon Campus 1
Design of Air Conditioning and Ventilation System of The Gymnasium in The Polytechnic University of The Philippines Maragondon Campus 1
Maragondon Campus
Maragondon, Cavite
Design of Air-Conditioning and Ventilation System of the Gymnasium Located at the Polytechnic
University of the Philippines - Maragondon Campus
A Project Design
Presented to the Faculty of Engineering Department
Polytechnic University of the Philippines - Maragondon Campus
Maragondon, Cavite
Presented by:
Bencito, Aivan Angelo M.
Caalem, John Rencent D.
Catipon, Jerwin I.
Dela Cruz, Errica Erah F.
Marquez, David Joshua L.
Rojales, Joeriel J.
Sangal, Angela Mae L.
Sauquillo, Mary-Anne P.
Sipat, Trixia Jade N.
Tima, Jerome G.
Presented to:
Engr. Jhay-Ahr Flores, MSME
Adviser
BSME 3-1
April 2024
DEDICATION
This research is sincerely committed to Almighty God, our parents, professors, and
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To everyone who helped finish this project or endeavor, we would like to offer you our
profound gratitude and admiration. Throughout the entire process, their aid, advice, and support
have been priceless. The researchers would like to begin this acknowledgment by thanking
God, the Divine Creator, for all the blessings, guidance, and strength He has provided us
throughout this project or endeavor. We'd like to express our gratitude for the divine blessings
that came in the form of helpful people who were critical to our success. We value their
participation because their involvement, knowledge, and contributions are manifestations of
God's grace. The entire research team Bencito, A. A., Caalem, J. R., Catipon, J., Dela Cruz, E.
E., Marquez, D. J., Rojales, J., Sangal, A. M., Sauquillo, M. A., Sipat, T. J., and Tima, J., were
grateful to each other for their invaluable collaboration, stimulating discussions, and wealth of
knowledge.
The group's dynamic exchange of ideas and perspectives greatly aided in the refinement
and enhancement of the research findings. We would like to express our heartfelt appreciation
to our professor, Engr. Jhay-Ahr Flores, for his constant guidance, knowledge, and assistance.
His insightful opinions and constructive criticism were invaluable in this research and in assisting
us in overcoming obstacles. The institutional support provided by Polytechnic University of the
Philippines – Maragondon Campus deserves special mention. The access to state-of-the-art
facilities, libraries, and a conducive research environment significantly contributed to the
successful completion of this work.
We also want to thank our friends and families for their unwavering support, inspiration,
and compassion throughout this journey. They have been a constant source of inspiration and
motivation because they believe in our abilities. Finally, we would like to thank everyone who
contributed to this effort by mentioning any organizations, people, or other websites that
provided information, inspiration, or useful resources. Their efforts laid the groundwork for the
construction of this project.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
II. OBJECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
A. Outside Design Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
B. Inside Design Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
III. HEAT LOAD CALCULATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
A. External Heat Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
i. Roof Heat Gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
ii. Walls Heat Gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
iii. Windows/Glass Conduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
iv. Solar Conduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
B. Internal Heat Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
i. People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
ii. Equipment Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
iii. Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
C. Gymnasium Cooling Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
i. Gymnasium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
D. COOLING LOAD PER ROOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
IV. AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
A. Conference Room/Staff Room . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
B. Stock Room . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
C. Speech Lab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
D. Library . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
E. Computer Laboratory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 46
V. PLANT LAYOUT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
A. Air Control Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
B. Ductings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60
SUPPLY AIR DUCTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
C. Fan Coil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
D. Insulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
VI. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
VII. CATALOG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
A. AIR HANDLING UNITS (AHU) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
B. Model Selection of Chiller for Gymnasium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
C. Model Selection of Fan coil for Adjacent Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66
D Model Selection for Coil Insulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67
E. Model Selection of Condenser for the Extension Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 - 83
REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
3
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
I. Overview of the Project Design
Air conditioning is essential in a gymnasium's environment. A study by the company of
HITACHI: Air Conditioning solutions shows that heat with low humidity levels lead to faster
body-water vaporization, increasing the risk of dehydration, overheating, and stroke; high
temperature also negatively impacts muscle endurance. Therefore, air-conditioning gym
occupants, particularly those who perform sport, is necessary and considered therapeutic to
have high standards of Indoor Air Quality (IAQ).
The newly renovated gymnasium with its 2-floor adjacent building at the Polytechnic
University of the Philippines - Maragondon Campus located at Balitao Street, Barangay Garita
A, Poblacion IA, Maragondon, Cavite, 14.2530° North by 120.7350° East, is designed to have a
centralized air-conditioning system for proper heating and ventilation of the 2500 - people
capacity. The heating load capacity is calculated using peak temperature hours in Maragondon,
Cavite at 1200, 1300, and 1400 as reported in a study of The Global Historical Weather and
Climate Data.
II. Objectives
This study seeks to design a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system of the
Polytechnic University of the Philippines - Maragondon Campus’ Gymnasium to provide comfort,
cooling, and acceptable indoor quality. Specially, it seeks to determine the following:
1. Design Conditions
● Dry-bulb temperature
● Wet-bulb temperature
● Relative humidity
● Dew point temperature
● Humidity ratio
● Enthalpy
● Specific volume
2. Heating Calculation
a. Internal Heating Loads
● Lights
● People
● Appliances
● Infiltration
● Miscellaneous
b. External Heating Loads
● Roof
● Walls
● Window
● Solar Conditions
3. Grand Heat Total Load
4. Zone Calculations
4
CHAPTER 2
DESIGN CONDITIONS AND CALCULATIONS
The methods and systems chosen as the concept of this study are subject to precise
consideration, with the goal of ensuring that gymnasium air-conditioning not only complies with
local health and safety regulations, but also meets high indoor air quality standards (IAQ).
Designing and calculations must result in higher plant efficiency over a longer period of time.
The outside dry bulb temperature is critical for calculating cooling load. The designer
searches for variables that influence cooling capacity for this purpose.
5
Figure 1. PUP Gymnasium Outdoor Design Condition
This chart shows the psychrometric chart, plotted to cross the outdoor dry bulb
temperature of 84.2°F and outdoor relative humidity of 72%; wet bulb temperature, dew point
temperature, humidity ratio, enthalpy, and specific volume of the outdoor design conditions were
also determined.
Dew Specific
Dry Bulb Wet RH Humidity Enthalpy
Point Volume
˚F Bulb ˚F % Ratio BTU/lb
˚F ft3/lb
In the Philippines, the dry bulb temperature and relative humidity that must be kept on a
conditioned room for human is 70ﹾF and 60% respectively according to ASHRAE Standard 55
Thermal Environment Conditions for Human Occupancy.
6
Figure 2. PUP Gymnasium Indoor Design Condition
This figure shows the PUP Gymnasium Indoor Design Conditions in psychrometric chart,
plotted to cross the outdoor dry bulb temperature of 70ﹾF and outdoor relative humidity of 60%;
wet bulb temperature, dew point temperature, humidity ratio, enthalpy, and specific volume of
the outdoor design conditions were also determined.
Dew
Dry Bulb Wet RH Humidity Enthalpy Specific
Point
˚F Bulb ˚F % Ratio BTU/lb Volume ft3/lb
˚F
7
CHAPTER 3
External loads are the loads caused by heat transfer from the outside environment
through the building. To determine the loads, the heat gain through the walls, roof, walls,
windows, and doors is calculated.
Roof as a building surface has the most area exposed to the sun and contributes more
heat gains on the building.
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
Where:
𝑄 = Heat gain
𝑈 = Overall heat transfer coefficient
𝐴 = Area
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 = Cooling load temperature difference adjusted
From ASHRAE 1997, the total heat transfer coefficient of steel sheet roof with
𝐵𝑇𝑈
suspended ceiling and 2-in insulation is 𝑈 = 0. 092 2 , while the Cooling Load
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
Temperature Difference with suspended ceiling and using steel sheet with 2-in insulation are:
1200 62
1300 71
1400 77
Table 4. CLF value according to time
Computation:
For 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗:
Where:
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗= Cooling load temperature difference
8
𝑇𝑖 = Inside Temperature
𝑇𝑜 = Outside Temperature
Values:
𝐿𝑀 = 0
𝑘 = 1.0 for dark color
𝑇𝑖 = 70° F
𝑇𝑜 = 84.2 ° F
@ 1200
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]×𝑓
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 51. 9 °𝐹
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 51. 9 °𝐹
@ 1300
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]×𝑓
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 63. 15 °𝐹
@ 1400
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]×𝑓
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 63. 15 °𝐹
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 092 2 ×13433. 36 𝑓𝑡 × 54. 195 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 64141. 607 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 092 2 ×13433. 36 𝑓𝑡 × 63. 15 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 78045. 135 ℎ𝑟
9
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 092 2 ×13433. 36 𝑓𝑡 × 63. 15 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 78045. 135 ℎ𝑟
Orientation
Time
North East West South
1200 7 27 9 9
1300 8 30 10 12
1400 10 32 11 16
CLTD Correction for Latitude and Month Applied to Walls and Roofs, North Latitudes
for the month of May.
North -1
East -1
West -1
South -6
Where:
𝑘 = 0.65
𝑇𝑖 = 70° F
𝑇𝑜 = 84.2 ° F
10
NORTH
@ 1200
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 11. 1 °𝐹
@ 1300
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 11. 75 °𝐹
@ 1400
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 13. 05 °𝐹
EAST
@ 1200
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 24. 1 °𝐹
@ 1300
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 26. 05 °𝐹
@ 1400
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 27. 35 °𝐹
WEST
@ 1200
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 12. 4 °𝐹
@ 1300
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 13. 05 °𝐹
11
@ 1400
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 13. 7 °𝐹
SOUTH
@ 1200
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 9. 15 °𝐹
@ 1300
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 11. 1 °𝐹
@ 1400
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑘 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 13. 7 °𝐹
Orientation
Time
North East West South
Computation:
For Heat Load:
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑈 = 0. 2 2
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
NORTH
2
𝐴 = 2861. 21 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×2861. 21 𝑓𝑡 × 11. 1 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 6351. 886 ℎ𝑟
12
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×2861. 21 𝑓𝑡 × 11. 75 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 6723. 844 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×2861. 21 𝑓𝑡 × 13. 05 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 7467. 758 ℎ𝑟
EAST
2
𝐴 = 1690. 32 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×1690. 32 𝑓𝑡 ×24. 1 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 8147. 3424 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×1690. 32 𝑓𝑡 × 26. 05 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 8806. 567 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×1690. 32 𝑓𝑡 × 27. 35 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 9246. 05 ℎ𝑟
WEST
2
𝐴 = 1525. 96 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×1525. 96𝑓𝑡 ×12. 4 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 3784. 380 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×1525. 96 𝑓𝑡 × 13. 05 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 3982. 756 ℎ𝑟
13
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×1525. 96 𝑓𝑡 × 13. 7 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 4181. 130 ℎ𝑟
SOUTH
2
𝐴 = 2908. 25 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×2908. 25𝑓𝑡 ×9. 15 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 5322. 098 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×2908. 25 𝑓𝑡 × 11. 1 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 6456. 315 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 2 2 ×2908. 25 𝑓𝑡 ×13. 7 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 7968. 605 ℎ𝑟
Time CLTD
1200 9
1300 12
1400 13
𝐵𝑇𝑈
The overall heat transfer coefficient for a 6 mm reflective double glass is 0.83 2 .
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
Computation:
For 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗:
14
Where:
𝑇𝑖 = 70° F
𝑇𝑜 = 84.2° F
@ 1200
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 16. 2 °𝐹
@ 1300
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 19. 2 °𝐹
@ 1400
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = [𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷 + (78 − 𝑇𝑖 ) + (𝑇𝑜 − 85)]
𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗 = 20. 2 °𝐹
NORTH
2
𝐴 = 680. 79 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 =. 83 2 ×680. 79 𝑓𝑡 × 16. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 9153. 902 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 =. 83 2 ×680. 79 𝑓𝑡 ×19. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 10849. 069 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 =. 83 2 ×680. 79 𝑓𝑡 × 20. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 11414. 12 ℎ𝑟
15
EAST
2
𝐴 = 333. 68 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 83 2 ×333. 68 𝑓𝑡 ×16. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 4486. 661 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 83 2 ×333. 68 𝑓𝑡 × 19. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 5317. 524 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 83 2 ×333. 68 𝑓𝑡 × 20. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 5594. 479 ℎ𝑟
WEST
2
𝐴 = 364. 04 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 83 2 ×364. 04 𝑓𝑡 ×16. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 4894. 881 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 83 2 ×364. 04 𝑓𝑡 × 19. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 5801. 34 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 83 2 ×364. 04 𝑓𝑡 ×20. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 6103. 495 ℎ𝑟
16
SOUTH
2
𝐴 = 633. 75 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 83 2 ×633. 75 𝑓𝑡 ×16. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 8521. 402 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 83 2 ×633. 75 𝑓𝑡 × 19. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 10099. 44 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑈×𝐴× 𝐶𝐿𝑇𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑗
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 0. 83 2 ×633. 75 𝑓𝑡 ×20. 2 °𝐹
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡 −°𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 10625. 452 ℎ𝑟
Orientation
Month
North East West South
Table 9. The Maximum Solar Heat Gain Factor for Sunlit Glass
Note: Shading coefficient of 6 mm thick reflective double glass with no indoor shading is 0.3.
Cooling Load Factors for glass without interior shading [2]
Orientation
Time
North East West South
17
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
Where:
𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥 = Maximum solar heat gain factor
𝑆𝐶 = Shading coefficient
𝐴 = Area
𝐶𝐿𝐹 = Cooling Load Factor
Computation:
For Heat Load:
NORTH
2
𝐴 = 680. 79 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 47 2 ×0. 3×680. 79 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 70
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 6719. 397 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 47 2 ×0. 3×680. 79 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 73
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 7007. 371 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 47 2 ×0. 3×680. 79 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 75
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 7199. 354 ℎ𝑟
EAST
2
𝐴 = 333. 68 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 217 2 ×0. 3×333. 68 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 39
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 8471. 802 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 217 2 ×0. 3×333. 68 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 35
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 7602. 899 ℎ𝑟
18
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 217 2 ×0. 3×333. 68 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 31
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 6733. 996 ℎ𝑟
WEST
2
𝐴 = 364. 04 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 217 2 ×0. 3×364. 04𝑓𝑡 × 0. 14
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 3317. 861 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 217 2 ×0. 3×364. 04 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 19
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 4502. 811 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 217 2 ×0. 3×364. 048 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 29
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 6872. 711 ℎ𝑟
SOUTH
2
𝐴 = 633. 75 𝑓𝑡
@ 1200
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 42 2 ×0. 3×633. 75𝑓𝑡 ×0. 52
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 4152. 33 ℎ𝑟
@ 1300
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 42 2 ×0. 3×633. 75 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 57
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 4551. 593 ℎ𝑟
@ 1400
𝑄 = 𝑆𝐻𝐺𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥×𝑆𝐶×𝐴×𝐶𝐿𝐹
𝐵𝑇𝑈 2
𝑄 = 42 2 ×0. 3×633. 75 𝑓𝑡 × 0. 58
ℎ𝑟−𝑓𝑡
𝐵𝑇𝑈
𝑄 = 4631. 445 ℎ𝑟
19
EXTERNAL LOADS (BTU/hr) TOTAL TOTAL
(BTU/hr) (TOR)
TIME Roofs Walls Glass Solar
B. INTERNAL LOAD
In contemporary structures, the primary source of the cooling demand stems from the
internal heat generated by occupants, lighting, motors, appliances, and equipment. The
escalation in computer usage and the advent of spaces with high occupancy have led to an
increase in internal loads, especially as building shells have become more efficient in
compliance with stricter energy regulations.
To calculate the total cooling requirement within a gymnasium, it’s crucial to determine
the amount of sensible and latent heat produced by individuals and various other elements.
i. People
The additional sensible heat and moisture that people bring in is significant even in
situations where occupancy is short. Since they are one of the primary sources of internal heat
load, a gymnasium that can accommodate 2500 individuals must be taken into consideration.
Chart 2. Representative Rates at Which Heat and Moisture Are Given Off by
Human Beings in Different States of Activity
20
a. Cooling Load Factor
Prior to being released into the atmosphere, the sensible heat needs to be absorbed by
the surrounding environment. The cooling load factor explains the lag in time. Latent heat has
no associated cooling load factor because it is an instantaneous cooling load. Examples of SHG
and LHG from individuals are provided in the table below. It illustrates the range of heat gain
values brought on by people. The Cooling Load Factor can be obtained from the table below.
Chart 3. CLF for occupancy heat gain or CLF values in Table 19 of 1997 ASHRAE
Handbook
Bleacher Area
Total area of bleachers = 5000 ft2 (based on pup gymnasium detailed plan)
Seat capacity = 625 person
2
5000𝑓𝑡
Seat capacity = 8𝑓𝑡
2
𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛
(𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 1 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑘 𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑠)
𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
1300 h: Qs = 625 x 245 ℎ𝑟
x 0.18 = 27,562.5 ℎ𝑟
𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
1400 h: Qs = 625 x 245 ℎ𝑟
x 0.15 = 22,968.75 ℎ𝑟
𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
1300 h: Qs = 1075 x 250 ℎ𝑟
x 0.02 = 5,375 ℎ𝑟
𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
1400 h: Qs = 1075 x 250 ℎ𝑟
x 0.02 = 5,375 ℎ𝑟
𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
1300 h: Qs = 750 x 305 ℎ𝑟
x 0.02 = 4,575 ℎ𝑟
𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
1400 h: Qs = 750 x 305 ℎ𝑟
x 0.02 = 4,575 ℎ𝑟
21
Athletics (2% of full capacity)
𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
1200 h: Qs = 50 x 710 ℎ𝑟
x 0.03 = 1,065 ℎ𝑟
𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
1300 h: Qs = 50 x 710 ℎ𝑟
x 0.02 = 710 ℎ𝑟
𝐵𝑡𝑢 𝐵𝑡𝑢
1400 h: Qs = 50 x 710 ℎ𝑟
x 0.02 = 710 ℎ𝑟
22
ii. EQUIPMENT LOAD
The cooling load calculation needs to take into account the use of different appliances,
both gas and electrical. Equipment load is the heat load resulting from the appliances and
equipment in a conditioned gymnasium.
Q = 6288.04 BTU/hr
iii. LIGHTING
Lighting systems, like sunlight and appliances, contribute to heat gain in a
building, though the amounts vary depending on bulb type.
Where:
Qel = heat gain, Btu/hr
Fu = utilization factor or fraction of installed lamps in use
Fb = special allowance factor
CLF = cooling-load factor from Table 4.41 conversion factor
a. Wattage
The total light wattage is obtained from the ratings of all lamps installed, both for
general illumination and for display use. Ballasts are not included, but are addressed by
separate factors. Ballast is a device placed in line with the load to limit the amount of
current in an electrical circuit.
23
b. Lighting Use Factor
The ratio of the amount of time the lights will be used is called the lighting use
factor. In most cases, such as in offices, classrooms, shops, hospitals, gymnasiums, and
other similarly busy places, this factor is 1.0.
This special allowance factor takes into account the heat from ballasts. This
factor is typically 1.2 for fluorescent lights and 1.0 for incandescent due to the lack of
ballasts. In this case, the lighting fixtures used in Fast Food Chain are fluorescent lamps.
The cooling load factor for lights depends on type of air supply and return, space
and furnishings, when it was turned on, and how many hours did it remain open after it
was turned on. In this case, the lighting fixtures of the Fast Food Chain is 1.0. These
cooling load factors will be seen in the Chapter 28 Table 38 of the 1997 ASHRAE
Handbook. If the lights are left on for 24 hours a day.
24
Table 15. Summary of loads from lighting
Fluorescent Light
Qel = 3.41 (lamp rating in watts)(Fu)(Fb)(CLF)
Qel = 3.41(1770 watts)(1.0)(1.2)(0.89) = 6446.1276 BTU/hr
The total heat gain from lighting Fluorescent Light is 6446.1276 BTU/hr
Incandescent Light
Qel = 3.41 (lamp rating in watts)(Fu)(Fb)(CLF)
Qel = 3.41 (6300 watts) (1.0) (1.0) (0.89) = 19,119.87 BTU/hr
The total heat gain from lighting Incandescent Light is 19,119.87 BTU/hr
INTERNAL LOAD
TOTAL TOTAL
TIME PEOPLE EQUIPME LIGHTS (BTU/hr) (TOR)
NT
SENSIBLE LATENT
The subtotal load calculated from internal and external conditions is ranging from
83.93 TOR to 8.3 TOR. Heat load from a maximum occupancy of 2500 individuals yields
79% of the total heat load. Internal Load yields 82.4% while the External load yields
17.6% of the total heat load only.
25
LOAD SOURCES Cooling Load (BTU/hr)
Sensible Latent
External
Roof 80,881.45 0
Walls 34,362.817 0
Glass 38,848.289 0
Internal
Equipment 6288.04 0
Lights 25,565.9976 0
i. Gymnasium
Then: 𝑓 = 1 − 0. 02 ( 8985
498.56 ) = 0. 6394
Therefore; Subtotal Room Sensible = 259,530.35 x 0. 6394 = 165,943.71 Btu/hr
Ventilation Air
Supply duct leakage, allowable leak = 10%
Therefore, supply leakage = 165,943.71 Btu/hr x 0.10
SL = 16,594.37 BTU/hr
Net Room Sensible Heat
NRS = Subtotal sensible heat – supply leakage
= 165,943.71 – 16,594.37
= 149,349.34 BTU/hr
For Ventilation Air
From Table 1 ASHRAE Standards, Air Conditioning Load Check Figures
For Multi Use Ventilation High = 15 cfm/ person
Then: 2500 persons x 15 cfm/person = 38,250 cfm
26
Coil Cooling Load
For Sensible Heat:
𝑄𝑠 = 1. 10 𝑥 𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 ∆𝑡
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dT = Inside-Outside Air Temperature Difference, deg F
Ti = Maintaining Temperature Inside the Space = 70℉
To = Outside Temperature = 84.2℉
Therefore:
𝑄𝑠 = 1. 10 𝑥 38, 250 𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 (84. 2 − 70)℉
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dW = Inside-Outside Air Humidity Ratio Difference, (lbwv/lbda)
𝑄𝐿 = 4840 𝑥 38, 250𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 𝑤
Therefore;
Latent Heat Load = QL PERSON + QL VENTILATION
Duct Ventilation
With duct leakage of 10%
Duck leakage = 2,402,848.75 BTU/hr x 0.10 = BTU/hr
DL = 240,284.88 BTU/hr
27
COOLING LOAD SUMMARY
o Return Air 0
Sensible Latent
Ground Floor
Second Floor
Then, 𝑓 = 1 − 0. 02 ( 761
64.68 ) = 0. 7647
28
Therefore;
Subtotal Room Sensible = 1363.64 x 0. 6394 = 1042.78 Btu/hr
Ventilation air
Supply duct leakage, allowable leak = 10%
Therefore, supply leakage = 1042.78 Btu/hr x 0.10
SL = 104.28 BTU/hr
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dT = Inside-Outside Air Temperature Difference, deg F
Ti = Maintaining Temperature Inside the Space = 70℉
To = Outside Temperature = 84.2℉
Therefore: 𝑄𝑠 = 1. 10 𝑥 225 𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 (84. 2 − 70)℉
𝑄𝑠 = 3514. 5 𝐵𝑇𝑈/ℎ𝑟
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dW = Inside-Outside Air Humidity Ratio Difference, (lbwv/lbda)
𝑄𝐿 = 4840 𝑥 225𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 𝑤
29
Therefore;
Latent Heat Load = QL PERSON + QL VENTILATION
Latent Heat Load = (630 + 13,176.9) BTU/hr
Latent Heat Load = 13,806.9 BTU/hr
Duct Ventilation
With duct leakage of 10%
Duck leakage = 13,806.9 BTU/hr x 0.10 = BTU/hr
DL = 1380.69 BTU/hr
Cooling Load
Return Air 0
Table 20. Cooling Load Summary of Ground Floor Comfort Room Area/Culture and
Arts/Conference Room
b. STOCK ROOM
Then: 𝑓 = 1 − 0. 02 ( 252.04
64.36 ) = 0. 9217
Therefore; Subtotal Room Sensible = 586.36 x 0. 9217 = 540.45 Btu/hr
Ventilation Air
Supply duct leakage, allowable leak = 10%
Therefore, supply leakage = 540.45 Btu/hr x 0.10
SL = 54.04 BTU/hr
Net Room Sensible Heat
NRS = Subtotal sensible heat – supply leakage
= 540.5 – 54.04
= 486.46 BTU/hr
30
For Ventilation Air
From Table 1 ASHRAE Standards, Air Conditioning Load Check Figures
For Multi Use Ventilation High = 15 cfm/ person
Then: 15 persons x 15 cfm/person = 150 cfm
Cooling Coil Load
For Sensible Heat:
𝑄𝑠 = 1. 10 𝑥 𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 ∆𝑡
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dT = Inside-Outside Air Temperature Difference, deg F
Ti = Maintaining Temperature Inside the Space = 70℉
To = Outside Temperature = 84.2 ℉
Therefore: 𝑄𝑠 = 1. 10 𝑥 150 𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 (84. 2 − 70)℉
𝑄𝑠 = 2343 𝐵𝑇𝑈/ℎ𝑟
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dW = Inside-Outside Air Humidity Ratio Difference, (lbwv/lbda)
𝑄𝐿 = 4840 𝑥 150𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 𝑤
𝑄𝐿 = 8784. 6 𝐵𝑇𝑈/ℎ𝑟
Duct Ventilation
With duct leakage of 10%
Duck leakage = 9204 BTU/hr x 0.10 = BTU/hr
DL = 920.4 BTU/hr
31
Cooling Load
Return Air 0
c. SPEECH LABORATORY
Then: 𝑓 = 1 − 0. 02 ( 213
58.92 ) = 0. 928
Therefore: Subtotal Room Sensible = 724.73 x 0. 928 = 672.55 Btu/hr
Ventilation Air
Supply duct leakage, allowable leak = 10%
Therefore, supply leakage = 672.55 Btu/hr x 0.10
SL = 67.26 BTU/hr
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dT = Inside-Outside Air Temperature Difference, deg F
Ti = Maintaining Temperature Inside the Space = 70℉
To = Outside Temperature = 84.2℉
32
Therefore: 𝑄𝑠 = 1. 10 𝑥 450 𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 (84. 2 − 70)℉
𝑄𝑠 = 7029 𝐵𝑇𝑈/ℎ𝑟
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dW = Inside-Outside Air Humidity Ratio Difference, (lbwv/lbda)
𝑄𝐿 = 4840 𝑥 450𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 𝑤
𝑄𝐿 = 26353. 8 𝐵𝑇𝑈/ℎ𝑟
Duct Ventilation
With duct leakage of 10%
Duck leakage = 27193.8 BTU/hr x 0.10 = BTU/hr
DL = 2719.38 BTU/hr
Cooling Load
o Return Air 0
33
d. LIBRARY
Then: 𝑓 = 1 − 0. 02 ( 1484.66
190.24 ) = 0. 8439
Therefore; Subtotal Room Sensible = 4996.9 x 0. 8439 = 4216.88 Btu/hr
Ventilation Air
Supply duct leakage, allowable leak = 10%
Therefore, supply leakage = 4216.88 Btu/hr x 0.10
SL = 421.69 BTU/hr
= 3795.19 BTU/hr
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dT = Inside-Outside Air Temperature Difference, deg F
Ti = Maintaining Temperature Inside the Space = 70℉
To = Outside Temperature = 84.2℉
Therefore: 𝑄𝑠 = 1. 10 𝑥 900 𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 (84. 2 − 70)℉
Ventilation Load
For Latent Heat: 𝑄𝐿 = 4840 𝑥 900 𝑥 ∆𝑊
34
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dW = Inside-Outside Air Humidity Ratio Difference, (lbwv/lbda)
𝑄𝐿 = 4840 𝑥 900𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 𝑤
𝑄𝐿 = 52707. 6 𝐵𝑇𝑈/ℎ𝑟
Duct Ventilation
With duct leakage of 10%
Duck leakage = 55227.6 BTU/hr x 0.10 = BTU/hr
DL = 5522.76 BTU/hr
Cooling Load
Return Air 0
e. COMPUTER LABORATORY
35
Then: 𝑓 = 1 − 0. 02 ( 249.59
64.18 ) = 0. 92
Therefore; Subtotal Room Sensible = 3372.95 x 0. 92 = 3103.1 Btu/hr
Ventilation Air
Supply duct leakage, allowable leak = 10%
Therefore, supply leakage = 3103.1 Btu/hr x 0.10
SL = 310.3 BTU/hr
Net Room Sensible Heat
NRS = Subtotal sensible heat – supply leakage
= 3103.1 – 310.3
= 2792.8 BTU/hr
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dT = Inside-Outside Air Temperature Difference, deg F
Ti = Maintaining Temperature Inside the Space = 70℉
To = Outside Temperature = 84.2℉
Therefore: 𝑄𝑠 = 1. 10 𝑥 450 𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 (84. 2 − 70)℉
𝑄𝑠 = 7029 𝐵𝑇𝑈/ℎ𝑟
Ventilation Load
For Latent Heat: 𝑄𝐿 = 4840 𝑥 𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 ∆𝑊
Where:
m = Mass Flow Rate of Air, cfm
dW = Inside-Outside Air Humidity Ratio Difference, (lbwv/lbda)
𝑄𝐿 = 4840 𝑥 450𝑐𝑓𝑚 𝑥 𝑤
36
Therefore: Latent Heat Load = QL PERSON + QL VENTILATION
Latent Heat Load = (1260 + 26,353.8) BTU/hr
Latent Heat Load = 27,613.8 BTU/hr
Duct Ventilation
With duct leakage of 10%
Duck leakage = 27,613.8 BTU/hr x 0.10 = BTU/hr
DL = 2761.38 BTU/hr
Cooling Load
Return Air 0
10,610.86 BTU/hr
Stock Room
30518.47 BTU/hr
Speech Lab
64,545.55 BTU/hr
Library
36,931.75 BTU/hr
Computer Laboratory
158,732.72 BTU/hr
TOTAL
13.23 TOR
37
Supply Condition
Where:
m = Total Supply Air, cfm
Q = Cooling load
Ti = Maintaining Temperature Inside the Space = 70℉
To = Supply Air Temperature = 55℉ for supply cfm:
Source: http://8760engineeringblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/why-is-supply-airtemperature-55f.html
The total 178, 897. 23𝑐𝑓𝑚 supply of air based on the fresh air needed for an area of 1527.97 m2.
38
CHAPTER 4
AIR CONDITIONING DESIGN
A. Gymnasium
1(21.11−14) 76.43 𝑘𝑊
45−ℎ𝑖
= 76.43 𝑘𝑊+47.75 𝑘𝑊
ℎ𝑖 = 33.45 KJ/kg
39
Using psychrometric chart:
ℎ𝑖 = 31.9176 KJ/kg
40
(c) Mass rate of air entering the cooling coil.
0.22𝑘𝑊+0.1848𝑘𝑊
𝑚= 45 𝐾𝑗 31.1976𝐾𝐽 = 0. 0293 𝑘𝑔/𝑠
𝑘𝑔
− 𝑘𝑔
41
C. Stock Room
1(21.11−14) 0.142𝑘𝑊
45−ℎ𝑖
= 0.142 𝑘𝑊+0.1232 𝑘𝑊
ℎ𝑖 = 31.7295 KJ/kg
AC Capacity = 0.5041 kW
42
Using psychrometric chart:
Figure 5 . Psychrometric Chart of Staff Room Indoor and Outdoor Air Condition
D. Speech Lab
43
(b) Air-conditioning leaving the coil
(
𝐶𝑝 𝑡𝑐−𝑡𝑖 ) 𝑞𝑠
ℎ𝑐−ℎ𝑖
= 𝑞𝑠+𝑞𝑙
1(21.11−14) 0.308𝑘𝑊
45−ℎ𝑖
= 0.308 𝑘𝑊+0.2464 𝑘𝑊
ℎ𝑖 = 32.202 KJ/kg
Figure 6. Psychrometric Chart of Speech Lab Indoor and Outdoor Air Condition
44
E. Library
1(21.11−14) 0.953𝑘𝑊
45−ℎ𝑖
= 0.953 𝑘𝑊+0.7392 𝑘𝑊
ℎ𝑖 = 32.375 KJ/kg
AC Capacity = 3.29439 kW
45
Using psychrometric chart:
F. Computer Laboratory
46
(b) Air-conditioning leaving the coil
(
𝐶𝑝 𝑡𝑐−𝑡𝑖 ) 𝑞𝑠
ℎ𝑐−ℎ𝑖
= 𝑞𝑠+𝑞𝑙
1(21.11−14) 0.4693𝑘𝑊
45−ℎ𝑖
= 0.4693 𝑘𝑊+0.3696 𝑘𝑊
ℎ𝑖 = 32.29 KJ/kg
0.4693𝑘𝑊+0.3696𝑘𝑊
𝑚= 45𝐾𝑗 32.29𝐽 = 0. 066 𝑘𝑔/𝑠
𝑘𝑔
− 𝑘𝑔
AC Capacity = 1.62822 kW
Figure 7. Psychrometric Chart of Computer Laboratory Indoor and Outdoor Air Condition
47
AC Capacity/Coil Capacity AC Enthalpy
AREAS (kW) Capacity/Coil Difference
Capacity (KJ/kg)
(BTU/hr)
Extension Building
48
CHAPTER 5
PLANT LAYOUT
V. Plant Layout
Figure 8. 2D Floor Plan with Air-conditioning System Design (Court & Building)
49
Figure 10. 2D Floor Plan with Air-conditioning System Design (Second Floor)
Figure 11. 2D Floor Plan with Air-conditioning System Design (Roof Deck)
50
Figure 12. 3D [SW Isometric] Mechanical View of Air-conditioning System Design
51
Figure 14. 3D [Side] Mechanical View of Air-conditioning System Design
52
Figure 17. 3D [Top] Actual View of Air-conditioning System Design
53
Figure 19. 3D [NW Isometric] Actual View of Air-conditioning System Design
54
Figure 21. 3D [Front] Actual View of Air-conditioning System Design
55
Figure 23. 3D [Inside Cam view Gym] Actual View of Air-Conditioning System Design
Figure 24. 3D [Inside Cam view of Library] Actual View of Air-Conditioning System
Design
56
Figure 25. 3D [Cam view of Roof deck] Actual View of Air-Conditioning System Design
Figure 26. 3D [Gymnasium Floor Plan - 1 ] Actual View of Air-Conditioning System Design
57
Figure 27. 3D [Gymnasium Floor Plan - 2 ] Actual View of Air-Conditioning System Design
58
Figure 29. Diagram of Air Control System for Fan Coil Unit (FCU) per Room
59
B. DUCTINGS
The computed area for the main duct is 11.25 sq ft, from the table 6 of the Carrier
Handbook, the recommended duct size of 116 inches by 18 inches.
From ASHRAE Table 7, the Recommended Maximum Duct Velocities for Low
Velocity Systems, 1600 fpm.
3
𝑓𝑡
𝑄 1184.21 𝑚𝑖𝑛 2
𝐴= 𝑉
= 𝑓𝑡 = 0. 74 𝑓𝑡
1600 𝑚𝑖𝑛
The computed area for each branch duct is 0.74 sq ft, from the table 6 Carrier
Handbook the recommended duct size of 12 inches by 10 inches
The computed area for the branch duct is 0.99 sq. ft. From table 6 of Carrier
Handbook, the recommended duct size is 20 inches by 8 inches.
60
C. FAN COIL
24𝐺𝑝𝑚
0. 93 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑥 1𝑡𝑜𝑛
= 22. 32 𝐺𝑝𝑚
1𝑚𝑖𝑛 3
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 (22.32 𝐺𝑝𝑚)( 60𝑠
)(231𝑖𝑛 /𝑔𝑎𝑙)
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 = 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦
= 2 12𝑖𝑛
6𝑓𝑡/𝑠 ( 𝑓𝑡 )
R = (𝐴/π)
= (1. 935/π)
R = 0.78 in
D = 1.5696 in
D. INSULATION
INSULATION THICKNESS
According to ASHRAE Standards for different pipe size and temperature ranges.
According to the standard, for low temperature
61
Conduit through Pipes - Heat Transfer Calculation
(𝑇2−𝑇1)
𝑄=
𝑙𝑛 ( )
𝑑
𝑑
2
1
2π𝑘𝐿
Where:
Q = Heat transfer, W
K = Thermal conductivity, (0.034 for polyethylene),
T2 = Outside temperature
T1 = Temperature of the air leaving the coil
D2 = Outside Diameter
D1 = Inside Diameter
Length of Pipe = Estimated approximately to 48.16 meters.
𝑑𝑖 = 𝐷𝑜 − 2𝑡
3
𝑑𝑖 = 1. 5696𝑖𝑛 − 2( 8 𝑖𝑛)
𝑑𝑖 = 0. 8196 𝑖𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑠
For polyethylene:
(𝑇2−𝑇1)
𝑄=
𝑙𝑛( )𝐷
𝑑
𝑜
𝑖
2π𝑘𝐿
(36.7−11.6)𝐾
𝑄= 1.5696𝑖𝑛
𝑙𝑛( 0.8196𝑖𝑛 )
0.034𝑊
2π( 𝑚
.𝐾)(48.16𝑚)
0.0083𝑘𝑊
𝑄= 𝑚
= 8. 3 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟
Q = 0.397 kW or 379 watts heat loss from a pipe with a length of 48.16 meters.
Note: allowable heat loss from FCU lines pipe is 80 watts per meter. Thus, 8.3 watts per meter
(Source: https://www.pipingengineer.org/calculation-of-insulation-thickness-for-pipes.)
62
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION
The air conditioning system creates an environment where people tend to feel extremely
comfortable. In such conditions, human efficiency reaches its peak, enabling them to work with
high energy. The PUP Gymnasium requires a proper ventilation and air conditioning system,
which necessitates the application of scientific principles to understand the behavior and
properties of air, calculate equipment needs, and size the pipes or ducts. This system
significantly influences the health and safety of students and faculty. Extreme heat adversely
affects mental and physical performance, and the use of air conditioning can help mitigate these
effects both at work and during leisure time. A well-maintained air conditioning system aids in
keeping out external allergens like pollen. The cooling load of the PUP Gymnasium
encompasses appliances, outdoor air, occupants, lighting, ventilation, and the indoor building
envelope walls, among other things. The ventilation loads and building envelope are the primary
contributors.
The overall cooling load from mere factors equipped for the PUP gymnasium to use a
260kW Air Handling Unit (AHU) and a Chiller for the court and 10 Fan Coil Units (FCU) with a
capacity of 5.28kW and 2 VRF Condensers with a capacity of 30kW will be used for the
extension building.
63
CHAPTER 7
CATALOG
A. AIR HANDLING UNITS (AHU)
An air handling unit (AHU) is a collection of elements mounted in large, accessible
box-shaped units called modules that house the necessary ventilation for purifying,
air-conditioning, or renewing the indoor air in a building or premises.
They are typically installed on the roofs of buildings and circulate air through ducts to each
of the rooms in the building in question.
The AHU specification for PUP gymnasium will be based on the cooling load calculation with a
total of 252 kW.
64
B. Model Selection of Chiller for Gymnasium
260 kW Chiller
The 260 KW chiller is a tough, portable fluid chiller designed for large applications such
as process cooling, temporary body storage, facilities, and hospitals. The unit can be quickly
connected to existing pipework and can cool fluids to as low as -5 C in minutes. The 260 KW
model is specifically designed for use in commercial and industrial environments where low
temperatures are required. It can be configured with a heat pump option to provide clients with
heating as well as cooling.
● Weight 2,810 kg
65
C. Model Selection of Fan coil for Adjacent Building
66
E. Model Selection of Condenser for the Extension Building
The condenser design for the adjacent building is based on the cooling capacity of the
Fan Coil Units (FCU) with 5.28kW with a total of 52.8 kW for 10 units in the Extension Building.
2 Condensers with a capacity of 30 kW will be installed at the roof deck of the building.
30 kW
67
Condenser Design Specification
68
APPENDICES
69
FIGURES
70
71
72
73
TABLES
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
REFERENCES:
https://www.daikin.com.sg/resources/ck/files/catalogue/Air%20Handling%20Unit%20(A
H%20Models).pdf?fbclid=IwAR1yljtuHrhLAqhFgtBVM92-1zbwu-pFMENxQ8hBG_mVzi4
EDvklw_01DgQ
https://media.cheggcdn.com/media/2f5/2f56b52f-a140-4438-9131-d4c8d767c6a6/phpln
UxEB
https://archive.org/details/ashraehandbook2017hvacfundamentalsip/page/n422/mode/1
up?view=theater
https://energy-models.com/internal-heat-gains-ihg#:~:text=Examples%2C%20155%20bt
u%2Fhr%20per,manual%20work%20in%20a%20factory.&text=%3D%20Cooling%20Lo
ad%20Factor%20(CLF),space%20(ASHRAE%20Table%208.19).
https://www.therma.com/how-to-factor-lighting-into-your-cooling-loads/
https://www.academia.edu/44759152/REFRIGERATION_and_AIR_CONDITIONING_B
Y_W_F_STOECKER_and_J_W_JONES_2nd_ed_Second_Edition_?fbclid=IwAR0ogw
GONOrwXclmfhAB1RnL9XJPDjz9SoLcy0S_QcFApjWny53_7vznuXI
https://studylib.net/doc/25887787/2021-ashrae-handbook-fundamentals-table-of-u-value
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5y_VBiTiuAY&t=14s
https://vtsgroup.com/?fbclid=IwAR0jGyLxJ_gcyB_IInkxqkHuc4LlzwrFmRNlKpMS2mHyL
gSSFVaTqdvJrfY
https://www.andrews-sykes.com/chillers/fluid-chillers/200kw-rae802-fluid-chiller/
https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/-/media/jci/be/united-states/refrigeration/industrial-refri
geration/xlp2-evaporative-condensors/files/be_spec_xlp2_evp_condenser.pdf
https://iridl.ldeo.columbia.edu/dochelp/QA/Basic/dewpoint.html
https://www.honminggroup.com/product/round-cooling-tower/?fbclid=IwAR1mxTtFBVLG
ZbMoPd38o1Qw_TEmTxJXXJIOCIIrDcRbrl8-HLMr52YOfZA
https://kimpur.com/en/building-and-insulation-industry/pipe-insulation-polyurethane-systems
84