Scribd
Upload
53 views

Pile Caps

This document provides the design of a pile cap to support three piles and a column. It includes design criteria, input data, analysis to check flexure capacity, shear capacity, and column and single pile punching capacity. The design is found to be adequate and satisfies the requirements according to ACI 318-19.

Uploaded by

m.hgag13
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
53 views

Pile Caps

This document provides the design of a pile cap to support three piles and a column. It includes design criteria, input data, analysis to check flexure capacity, shear capacity, and column and single pile punching capacity. The design is found to be adequate and satisfies the requirements according to ACI 318-19.

Uploaded by

m.hgag13
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

PROJECT : PAGE :

CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Pile Cap Design for 3-Piles Pattern Based on ACI 318-19
DESIGN CRITERIA
1. FROM PILE DESIGN & SOIL REPORT, DETERMINE SINGLE PILE MAX LOADS OR CAPACITY AT CAP BOTTOM FACE, fPn, fMn, & fVn.
2. THE MAXIMUM COLUMN CAPACITY AT COLUMN BASE, fPn,col, fMn,col, fVn,col, MAY BE BASED ON PILE CAP BALANCED LOADS.
USER CAN CHANGE THE YELLOW CELLS TO MODIFY THEM FOR DIFFERENT CASES.
3. PILE CAPS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED BY TIES WITH Min(0.25, SDS/10) TIMES AXIAL VERT COLUMN LOADING. (IBC 1810.3.13)

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY


CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 4 ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
PILE DIAMETER D = 20 in
COLUMN SIZE (SHORT SIDE) C = 24 in
SINGLE PILE MAX LOADS OR CAPACITY fPn = 130 k
(at the section of cap bottom face) fMn = 400 ft-k
fVn = 35 k
PILE CLEAR DIST. (24" min, 2D reqd) Clear = 40 in
EDGE DISTANCE (9" min) Edge = 12 in The Column Can Support Max Loads:
EFFECTIVE DEPTH d = 53 in Pu,col ≤ fPn,col = 390 kips
CAP BOTTOM REINFORCING # 9 @ 16 in o.c., each way Mu,col ≤ fMn,col = 710.0 ft-kips
Vu,col ≤ fVn,col = 105 kips
THE PILE CAP DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK FLEXURE CAPACITY AT COLUMN FACE (ACI 318 21,22, & 24.4.3.1)
Pile Spacing = 60 in
Cap Edge Length = 136.2 in
L1-1 = 77.0 in, length of section 1-1
L2-2 = 104.7 in, length of section 2-2
Mu, 1-1 = 113.4 ft-kips / ft, (to middle of cap elevation)
Mu, 2-2 = 123.7 ft-kips / ft, (to middle of cap elevation)
rprovD = 0.0012

 M u , max 
0.85 f c 1  1  
'

 0.383b d 2 f c 
'

   0.0008 < rprovD [Satisfactory]


fy

0.85 1 f c' u
 MAX   0.0206 > rprovD [Satisfactory]
fy u t


 MIN  MIN  0.0018
T
,
4 
 0.0011 < rprovD [Satisfactory]
 d 3 
CHECK ONE WAY SHEAR CAPACITY AT THE FACE OF COLUMN & PILE
(ACI 318 22.5)
L3-3 = 62.4 in, length of section 3-3
Vu, 2-2 = 2 (fPn) / L2-2 = 0.0 kips / ft (No shear at "d" offset.)
Vu, 3-3 = (fPn) / L3-3 = 0.0 kips / ft (No shear at "d" offset.)

fVc = 2 f b d (fc')0.5 = 60.3 kips / ft > Vu, max [Satisfactory]


where f= 0.75 (ACI 318 21.2)

CHECK COLUMN PUNCHING CAPACITY (ACI 318 13.2.7.2, 22.6.4.1, 22.6.4.3, & 8.4.2.3)

P u ,col 0.5 v M u ,col b1


 v c( psi)    2  y  f 'c  190 ksi > v u ( psi )    31 ksi [Satisfactory]
AP J
1  4 d 
where bc = 1.00  v  1  0.4 y  MIN  2, , 40   2.0
2 b1   b 
b1 = (C + d) = 77 in 1  c 0
3 b2
b2 = (C + d) = 77 in
b0 = 2b1 + 2b2 = 308 in
 d b3    d  2  b 
Ap = b0 d = 16324 in2 J   1  1     3  2    870 ft4
 6    b1   b1  
 
(cont'd)
CHECK SINGLE PILE PUNCHING CAPACITY (ACI 318 13.2.7.2, 22.6.4.1, 22.6.4.3, & 8.4.2.3)

P u ,col 0.5 v M u ,col b1


 v c( psi )    2  y  f 'c  95 ksi > vu ( psi )    49 ksi [Satisfactory]
AP J
where a= 134.1 deg
b1 = (a / 360) (Dp / 4 + d) = 26 in
b2 = (a / 360) (Dp / 4 + d) = 26 in
b0 = (a / 360) (D + d) p = 85 in, conservative value
Ap = b0 d = 4529 in2

 d b3    d  2  b 
J   1  1     3  2    59 ft4
 6    b1   b1  
 

1
 v  1  0.4
2 b1
1
3 b2

y= 0 , conservative value as one way shear


PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Pile Cap Design for 4-Piles Pattern Based on ACI 318-19
DESIGN CRITERIA
1. FROM PILE DESIGN & SOIL REPORT, DETERMINE SINGLE PILE MAX LOADS OR CAPACITY AT CAP BOTTOM FACE, fPn, fMn, & fVn.
2. THE MAXIMUM COLUMN CAPACITY AT COLUMN BASE, fPn,col, fMn,col, fVn,col, MAY BE BASED ON PILE CAP BALANCED LOADS.
USER CAN CHANGE THE YELLOW CELLS TO MODIFY THEM FOR DIFFERENT CASES.
3. PILE CAPS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED BY TIES WITH Min(0.25, SDS/10) TIMES AXIAL VERT COLUMN LOADING. (IBC 1810.3.13)

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY


CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 4 ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
PILE DIAMETER D = 20 in
COLUMN SIZE (SHORT SIDE) C = 24 in
SINGLE PILE MAX LOADS OR CAPACITY fPn = 130 k
(at the section of cap bottom face) fMn = 400 ft-k
fVn = 35 k
PILE CLEAR DIST. (24" min, 2D reqd) Clear = 40 in
EDGE DISTANCE (9" min) Edge = 12 in The Column Can Support Max Loads:
EFFECTIVE DEPTH d = 53 in Pu,col ≤ fPn,col = 520 kips
CAP BOTTOM REINFORCING # 9 @ 12 in o.c., each way Mu,col ≤ fMn,col = 946.7 ft-kips
Vu,col ≤ fVn,col = 140 kips
THE PILE CAP DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK FLEXURE CAPACITY AT COLUMN FACE (ACI 318 21,22, & 24.4.3.1)
Pile Spacing = 60 in
Cap Edge Length = 104.0 in
L1-1 = 113.1 in, length of section 1-1
L2-2 = 104.0 in, length of section 2-2
Mu, 1-1 = 80.3 ft-kips / ft, (to middle of cap elevation)
Mu, 2-2 = 156.2 ft-kips / ft, (to middle of cap elevation)
rprovD = 0.0016
 M u , max 
0.85 f c' 1  1  
 0.383b d 2 f c' 
   0.0010 < rprovD [Satisfactory]
fy

0.85 1 f c' u
 MAX   0.0206 > rprovD [Satisfactory]
fy u t

 T 4 
 MIN  MIN  0.0018 ,  0.0014 < rprovD [Satisfactory]
 d 3 

CHECK ONE WAY SHEAR CAPACITY AT THE FACE OF COLUMN & PILE
(ACI 318 22.5)
L3-3 = 82.2 in, length of section 3-3
Vu, 2-2 = 2 (fPn) / L2-2 = 0.0 kips / ft (No shear at "d" offset.)
Vu, 3-3 = (fPn) / L3-3 = 0.0 kips / ft (No shear at "d" offset.)

fVc = 2 f b d (fc')0.5 = 60.3 kips / ft > Vu, max [Satisfactory]


where f= 0.75 (ACI 318 21.2)

CHECK COLUMN PUNCHING CAPACITY (ACI 318 13.2.7.2, 22.6.4.1, 22.6.4.3, & 8.4.2.3)
P u ,col 0.5 v M u ,col b1
 v c( psi )    2  y  f 'c  190 ksi > v u ( psi )    42 ksi [Satisfactory]
AP J
1  4 d 
where bc = 1.00  v  1  0.4 y  MIN  2, , 40   2.0
2 b1   b 
1  c 0
b1 = (C + d) = 77 in 3 b2
b2 = (C + d) = 77 in
b0 = 2b1 + 2b2 = 308 in  d b3    d  2  b 
J   1  1     3  2   
Ap = b0 d = 16324 in2  6    b1  870 ft4
   b1  
(cont'd)
CHECK SINGLE PILE PUNCHING CAPACITY (ACI 318 13.2.7.2, 22.6.4.1, 22.6.4.3, & 8.4.2.3)

P u ,col 0.5 v M u ,col b1


 v c( psi )    2  y  f 'c  95 ksi > v u ( psi )    40 ksi [Satisfactory]
AP J

where a= 164.1 deg


b1 = (a / 360) (Dp / 4 + d) = 31 in
b2 = (a / 360) (Dp / 4 + d) = 31 in
b0 = (a / 360) (D + d) p = 105 in, conservative value
Ap = b0 d = 5542 in2

 d b3    d  2  b 
J   1  1     3  2    90 ft4
 6    b1   b1  
 

1
 v  1 
2 b1 0.4
1
3 b2

y= 0 , conservative value as one way shear


PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Pile Cap Design for 2-Piles Pattern Based on ACI 318-19
DESIGN CRITERIA
1. FROM PILE DESIGN & SOIL REPORT, DETERMINE SINGLE PILE MAX LOADS OR CAPACITY AT CAP BOTTOM FACE, fPn, fMn, & fVn.
2. THE MAXIMUM COLUMN CAPACITY AT COLUMN BASE, fPn,col, fMn,col, fVn,col, MAY BE BASED ON PILE CAP BALANCED LOADS.
USER CAN CHANGE THE YELLOW CELLS TO MODIFY THEM FOR DIFFERENT CASES.
3. PILE CAPS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED BY TIES WITH Min(0.25, SDS/10) TIMES AXIAL VERT COLUMN LOADING. (IBC 1810.3.13)

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY


CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 4 ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
PILE DIAMETER D = 20 in
COLUMN SIZE (SHORT SIDE) C = 24 in
SINGLE PILE MAX LOADS OR CAPACITY fPn = 130 k
(at the section of cap bottom face) fMn = 400 ft-k
fVn = 35 k
PILE CLEAR DIST. (24" min, 2D reqd) Clear = 40 in
EDGE DISTANCE (9" min) Edge = 12 in The Column Can Support Max Loads:
EFFECTIVE DEPTH d = 53 in Pu,col ≤ fPn,col = 260 kips
CAP BOTTOM REINFORCING # 9 @ 12 in o.c., each way Mu,col ≤ fMn,col = 473.3 ft-kips
Vu,col ≤ fVn,col = 70 kips
THE PILE CAP DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK FLEXURE CAPACITY AT COLUMN FACE (ACI 318 21,22, & 24.4.3.1)
Pile Spacing = 60 in
Cap Edge Length = 104.0 in
L1-1 = 44.0 in, length of section 1-1
Mu, 1-1 = 104.4 ft-kips / ft, (to middle of cap elevation)
rprovD = 0.0016

 M u, max 
0.85 f c 1  1  
'

 bd 2 f c' 
  0.383
 0.0007 < rprovD [Satisfactory]
fy

0.85 1 f c' u
 MAX   0.0206 > rprovD [Satisfactory]
fy u t


 MIN  MIN  0.0018
T
,
4 
 0.0009 < rprovD [Satisfactory]
 d 3 
CHECK ONE WAY SHEAR CAPACITY AT THE FACE OF COLUMN & PILE
(ACI 318 22.5)
L2-2 = 44.0 in, length of section 2-2
Vu, 1-1 = (fPn) / L1-1 = 0.0 kips / ft (No shear at "d" offset.)
Vu, 2-2 = (fPn) / L2-2 = 0.0 kips / ft (No shear at "d" offset.)

fVc = 2 f b d (fc')0.5 = 60.3 kips / ft > Vu, max [Satisfactory]


where f= 0.75 (ACI 318 21.2)

CHECK COLUMN PUNCHING CAPACITY (ACI 318 13.2.7.2, 22.6.4.1, 22.6.4.3, & 8.4.2.3)

P u ,col 0.5 v M u ,col b1


 v c( psi )    2  y  f 'c  190 ksi > v u ( psi )    31 ksi [Satisfactory]
AP J
1  4 d 
where bc = 1.00  v  1  0.49367 y  MIN  2, , 40   2.0
2 b1   b 
b1 = (C + d) = 77 in 1  c 0
3 b2
b2 = [(C + min(Edge , d)] = 36 in
b0 = 2b1 + 2b2 = 226 in
 d b3    d  2  b 
Ap = b0 d = 11978 in2 J   1  1     3  2    559 ft4
 6    b1   b1  
 
(cont'd)
CHECK SINGLE PILE PUNCHING CAPACITY (ACI 318 13.2.7.2, 22.6.4.1, 22.6.4.3, & 8.4.2.3)

P u ,col 0.5 v M u ,col b1


 v c( psi )    2  y  f 'c  95 ksi > v u ( psi )    67 ksi [Satisfactory]
AP J
where a= 94.3 deg
b1 = (a / 360) (Dp / 4 + d) = 18 in
b2 = (a / 360) (Dp / 4 + d) = 18 in
b0 = (a / 360) (D + d) p = 60 in, conservative value
Ap = b0 d = 3185 in2

 d b3    d  2  b 
J   1  1     3  2    31 ft4
 6    b1   b1  
 

1
 v  1  0.4
2 b1
1
3 b2

y= 0 , conservative value as one way shear

You might also like