‘Defending Middle Earth – Tolkien: Myth and Modernity’

by Dr. Patrick Curry

ISBN 0 261 103717

Reviewed by: Tony Shell

This excellent book by Dr. Patrick Curry addresses this key question: do Professor Tolkien’s tales of
Middle Earth really matter?

Dr. Curry’s answer can be summed up as a resounding “yes”, and contained within his response is an
exploration of the relevance of mythic tradition in our contemporary world of ideology and industrialism.

Mythic folk tales are neither fantasy nor escapism, for they contain those cultural values and beliefs that
give us (usually in a subliminal way) the wisdom acquired by an enduring people. Patrick Curry describes this
wisdom in the unified context of community, nature and spirituality. A reading of such mythology therefore
calls for an ability to respond within this context – an ability increasingly being denied to us by the
‘modernizers’ and the political ‘progressives’.

In the introduction to his book Patrick Curry draws our attention to the fact that although Tolkien’s stated
intention was to recreate a “mythology for England”, his tales of Middle Earth have immense appeal
throughout the whole of the modern world. Dr. Curry argues that this global appeal is due to the global nature
of the problems that this mythology helps us to face – the excesses of authoritarian social control, and out-of-
control technology, of the ‘new global order’. A mythology must have contemporary applicability within its
own host community for it to survive and evolve, but that does not exclude it having a more general (or even
global) relevance.

In terms of Tolkien’s storytelling, Patrick Curry addresses, and dismisses most convincingly, accusations
of class snobbery, social elitism, racism and of fascism. Patrick Curry sees in the character of the Hobbits, and
the organisation of The Shire, a portrayal of an non-political community – in effect an anti-authoritarian
“yeoman republic”.

The shire-folk are shown to be a private people (but not xenophobic) having much common decency and a
love of their homeland in its most acceptable form – not overt nationalism, but perhaps the kind of gentle
patriotism (as expressed, for example, by George Orwell in his 1945 essay: ‘Notes on Nationalism’).

Tolkien’s ability to provide an extraordinarily sublime feeling of immanence and essential vitality to the
natural world is examined in detail by Patrick Curry. He explores the way in which a love of place and sense
of belonging can resist the forces of homogenizing modernity – as he puts it: “such local roots also resist
manipulation by abstract political ideologies”.

1
 This is the proposed “radical nostalgia” (a concept he attributes to Fraser Harrison) that provides a
rationale for activism - for an authentic response to the wretchedness of globalized industrial exploitation.
And, in a particularly insightful piece of analysis, the enchantment of mythological tales (such as Tolkien’s) is
contrasted to that of the disenchantment of the modernizer’s – of the latter’s preoccupation with reductionism
and determinism, and with the brutally manipulative ‘magic’ of machinery and ideological control.

It is clear that Patrick Curry is opposed to these forces of homogenization: “what we need to recognize are
the bonds linking nature, identity and place, whereby the heterogeneity of local distinctiveness suggests
richness: historical, cultural and ecological”. The power of the One Ring (to deceive, corrupt or seduce)
could be viewed as analogous to the relentless propaganda that underpins the illusion of ‘inevitable progress’
and the dogmatic pursuit of power and ultimate purpose – of Saruman’s “Knowledge, Rule, Order”.

However he also makes it very clear that he sees in these mythic stories an encouragement against despair
– examples of the physical courage and spiritual strength needed to confront such evils. Therefore, as Prof.
Tom Shippey has similarly observed, these tales of Middle Earth are true to this mythic tradition; they may
help us to clearly see the reality of our own circumstances and perhaps, just as Merry’s blowing of the silver
horn of Eorl raises the Shire, they may also galvanize us to action:

If Tolkien were to choose a symbol for his story and its message, it would be, I think, the horn
of Eorl. He would have liked to blow it in his own country, and disperse the cloud of post-war
and post-faith disillusionment, depression, acquiescence, which so strongly (and twice in his
lifetime) followed on victory. And perhaps he did. [Tom Shippey, ‘J R R Tolkien: Author of the
Century’, HarperCollins 2001, pp 220-221]

Likewise, Patrick Curry comments: “What is ‘The Scouring of the Shire’, politically speaking, but an
account of local resistance to fascist thuggery and forced modernization?”. Yes, it is precisely that.

An Afterword has been added to the 2004 US edition of this book (the edition under review) and includes
references to more recent global events since 1997 (including the worldwide release of the Peter Jackson
films – of which Patrick Curry clearly had reservations).

Again, the reasons for the universal appeal of Tolkien’s work – previously explored in the original edition
– are re-emphasised, with a timely reminder that there are many “hobbits and heroes” bravely confronting
tyranny on every continent and within every country. There is also a reminder that the book is not simply an
ecological diatribe – that it is essentially concerned with the indivisibility of community, nature, and
spirituality.

In the new afterword Patrick Curry states that: “I wouldn’t be quite so free with ‘postmodern’ now;
‘hypermodern’ might be better”. And, indeed, this is my one (minor) quibble – I feel that the ideology of
postmodernism is dealt with too sympathetically. In particular there is no direct reference to the subversive
promotion of ‘popular culture’ by postmodern cultural theorists. Their assumption that cultures (and therefore
mythologies) have no intrinsic value leads to their dismissal of the notion of cultural authenticity (Patrick
Curry refers to “authentic myth” in respect of writers such as Tolkien, in chapter 5).

For example, postmodernists would not agree with Patrick Curry’s criticisms of the Disney World’s crass
misrepresentation of the Faerie tradition. For example, they would insist the consumeristic products of the
Walt Disney Company are no less culturally authentic than the works of J R R Tolkien. Many postmodernists
are also zealous promoters of the vacuous politics of ‘market populism’.

2
 This book is packed-full of splendid observations and apposite quotes, and includes a good set of
references and notes. Some familiarity with Tolkien’s life and work will help the reader follow the author’s
arguments, but this is not essential – Patrick Curry helpfully provides, within the Introduction, a brief
biography of Tolkien’s life and a précis of The Lord Of The Rings.

This book is a good reference source for the dedicated scholar of Tolkien in particular, and of mythology
in general. But most importantly this book provides a cultural (moral) context for those actively concerned
with contemporary social, economic and environmental issues. The author writes in a lucid style, and his
arguments are cogent and compelling.

To sum up, Patrick Curry’s book ‘Defending Middle Earth’ is highly recommended.

End

[This review is based upon an article by the author, first published in Amon Hen (Tolkien Society Pub.), issue 194, 2004, pages 23-25]