CHAPTER ll
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental Site and Duration of the Study
The study was conducted at DNSC Freshwater fishpond, New Visayas, Panabo
City. The duration of the study was 60 days.
Experimental Set-up
The experimental Set-up consist of twelve hapa nets immerse in the concrete
tank and has the dimension of 1m x 1m x 1.5m with a distance 0.5 between hapa net.
The materials that will be used in this study are economically available and durable
enough to withstand weather fluctuation all throughout the culture period.
Experimental Treatments and Design
The study has four (4) treatments and each treatment will be replicated 3 times in
completely randomize designed (CRD). T1-Formulate diet control, T2-Formulated feed
with 1% of FFPH, T3-Formulated feed with 2% of FPH, T4-Formulated feed with 3% of
FPH.
T3R1 T2R3
T3R3 T4R2
T4R1 T3R2
T1R2 T1R1
T2R2 T4R3
T2R1 T1R3
Figure 2. The representation of the experimental design.
Experimental Species
The African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) fingerlings was used as experimental
species in this study. They have cylindrical body that reach an average length of 1.5
inches (4 cm). It has an elongated body and a smooth, scaleless skin. They also have
long barbels around their mouth. Additionally, they have a dorsal fin, coloration can vary
from gray to brownish-black. The 150 pcs of African Catfish will be purchased at Aqua
Penon Hatchery, Brgy. Ising, Carmen, Davao del Norte. In the selection of the
experimental species, the fish must be healthy, must be free from injury and no history
of disease within the facility which may lead to mortality of the fish.
Preparation of Fish Protein Hydrolysate
Acid hydrolysis was carried out using the method of Wisuthiphaet, Kongruang, &
Chamcheun, (2015) with minor modifications (Figure 1). The milkfish by-products were
thawed at 4 °C for 16 h. A combination of ground viscera (50g) and ground bones and
fins (50 g) were used in this study. Afterwards, the mixture (100 g) was added with 50
mL distilled water in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Three different hydrochloric acid
concentrations (4, 6, and 8M) were used in this study. Fifty milliliters of acid were added
to the fish slurry. The mixture was autoclaved at 121 °C under 15 psi for 90 min. The
reaction was then terminated by adjusting the pH of the solution to 5 using 6M NaOH.
The slurry was then filtered to remove any remaining debris. The filtered liquid was then
dried in an oven at 80 °C for 48 hrs. The dried sample was powdered and stored in a
desiccator until further analysis.
Milkfish by-products
Homogenization
Acid hydrolysis
(6 M HCI, 1:1 w/v)
121 °C, 15 psi for 90
min
Reaction termination
(pH adjustment to 5)
Milkfish by-products
Filtration protein hydrolysate
Over drying at 80°C for
Collection of filtrate
24hrs
Test Diets Preparation
Table 1. Composition of the control and experimental diets
Ingredients/
Test diets (%)
Chemical
Composition T1 T2 T3 T4
f
(0%) (1%) (2%) (3%)
Fish meal 22.00% 18.00 18.00 18.00
FPH 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Soybean meal 30.00 31.08 30.08 29.08
Rice bran 27.00 27.00 27.00 27.00
Corn 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00
Fish oil 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Vitamin mix 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Mineral mix 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total 100 100 100 100
Feed Preparation Procedure
This will be sieve or sifted until the fine liquid will obtained. The ground commercial feed
will be weighed into a desired amount and placed in a basin for mixing within 5 minutes.
Determine the correct percentage of the amount of Fish Protein hydrolysate to be added
to the feed. The Fish Protein Hydrolysate would then be mixed with feed. Then once the
Fish Protein Hydrolysate has been incorporated, the feed would likely be tested.
Grinding Sieving Weighing Mixing
Pelleting Sun Drying Packing
Feeds and Feeding Scheme
One day after stocking, 10% feeding rate was adopted in the first 15 days of
culture while 8% feeding rate was used in the next 15 days and was adjusted to 6%
feeding rate in the last phase of the culture period. Feeding of the GET-Excel catfish
fingerlings was done (3) times a day at 8:00 A.M with 30% of the feeds, at 12:00 noon,
30% and 40% at 4:00 p.m.in the afternoon.
Conditioning, Stocking and Sampling
Before stocking, the initial body weight of the fish was measured using electronic
weighing scale, respectively. The Get-Excel Catfish fingerlings upon arrival was
acclimatized by floating the bags for at least 30 minutes before stocking to equalize the
water temperature in the plastic bags with the surrounding water. The plastic bags was
opened and gradually filled with the surrounding water to acclimatize the fish in field
conditions.
Sampling for growth performance was done every 15th day starting at day 1 until
the end of the study. Sampling was done by randomly scooping the fish from the
aquarium using scoop net, after which the fish were placed in the basin with enough
water and aeration. After all, the fish were placed in the basin, it was placed in a beaker
and weighed, the body weight of the fish was measured using electronic weighing scale.
The outcome of sampling was the basis for the adjustment of feeds to be given for the
next 15 days of the culture.
Feeding Management
According to Gule and Geremew (2022), the implementation of effective feed
management practices in catfish (Clarias gariepinus) culture production has significant
economic implications, as it directly impacts production performance and long-term
aquaculture development. To maximize revenue and optimize production, it is crucial to
adopt efficient feed management strategies. The feeding requirements for cat fish
fingerlings, as stated by BFAR (2000), suggest that they should be fed within the range
of 30-15% of their biomass requirements. In this study, the catfish fingerlings was fed a
diet containing Fish Protein Hydrolysate. Feeding was conducted three times daily at
specific times: 0800H (30% of the daily feed intake), 1200H (30% of the daily feed
intake), and 1600H (40% of the daily feed intake), throughout the 60 days culture
period. The percentage of feeds consumed by the catfish was determined based on
their feeding requirement.
Proximate Analysis
Composition (%) Earthen Pond Reservoir Tank Flow-Through Rivers
Moisture 71.7I±1.65a 74.20±1.39a 73.60±2.37a 72.29±0.68a
Crude Protein 19.77±2.66a 20.99±0.68a 19.80±0.53a 18.84±1.00a
Crude Fat 3.85±0.5c 5.68±0.81a 4.95±0.38b 1.35±0.29d
Ash 1.52±0.40b 1.49±0.40b 2.23±0.91a 1.47±0.60b
Maintenance and Monitoring of Set-Up
The hapa net will be maintained by washing it every 15 days to ensure that the
unwanted matter and unconsumed feeds will be removed to avoid suffocation of the
stock, and ensure also the culture units to be clean. It will be done through brushing the
nets for the circulation of water. The hapa net will be monitored daily, to avoid the
escape of the cultured species.
Growth and Feed Utilization Parameters
Growth performances and feed utilization of fish was determined as described by
Alhassan et al., 2012 and Chavez et al., 2014 as follows:
Survival (%) = (final number of fish/ (initial number of fish) x 100
Weight Gain (g) = (final body weight-initial body weight)
Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) = [Total feed given (g)] / [Total weight gain (g)]
Daily Feed Allowance (DFA) = weight of sample x number of sample x survival rate x
feeding rate
Daily Feed Ration (DFR) = Biomass x Feeding Rate
Feed Conversion Ratio
The feed conversion ratio (FCR) of the three types of feed which were utilized in
this study was evaluated after 60 days of culture. The total amount of feed consumed by
the fish in each treatment were sum-up and compared with the total weight gain after
which the FCR was computed.
Economic Analysis
Cost and return analyses were conducted to determine the profitability of the
project. Cost-benefit analysis translated as return on investments (ROI) and cash
payback period was the determinant factors to package this technology. All expenses
incurred throughout the study were recorded as a basis in calculating the production
cost. ROI was determined to measure the economic profitability using the formula:
ROI Net Income/ Production Cost X 100%
Statistical Analysis
The mean values of the African catfish fingerlings will be statistically compared
using a Parametric and Non-parametric. Since I did not conduct the study yet, I don’t
have the statistical data so it is depending on if the assumptions are being met or
satisfied.