Acidic Soil
Acidic Soil
AGRIVITA
Journal of Agricultural Science
www.agrivita.ub.ac.id
ISSN: 0126-0537
Cite this as: Rawichandran, D., Kasim, S., Kee Zuan, A. T., Effendi, M. I., & Raguraj, S. (2024). Utilization of yeasts in
promoting plant growth in acidic soil – a review. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science, 46(1), 196-210. http://doi.
org/10.17503/agrivita.v46i1.4241
197
to leaching and volatilization than mineral fertilizers, fission. Yeast identification and taxonomy are
especially those related to biological processes, accomplished through a variety of molecular
they may provide more environmentally friendly biology techniques, such as amplified fragment
options. length polymorphism of D1/D2 domain, DNA
Although farming systems currently use bio- reassociation, hybridization, karyotyping, random
fertilizers, such as microorganisms, the interaction amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), ribosomal
between plant cultivars and microbial inoculations DNA phylogeny, and physiological testing (Zhang
is not well understood mechanistically. This lack of et al., 2020). While other yeast genera, including
accuracy is caused by two main insights gaps: the Candida and Brettanomyces (Deuteromycete) and
question of whether plants can use helpful microbes Cryptococcus and Rhodotorula (Basidiomycota),
to their fullest potential and the lack of genetic are categorized differently, the well-known “baker’s
variety needed to produce desirable features. yeast” is classified within the Ascomycota subclass
Significantly, there is still a dearth of study on some (Botha, 2011).
microorganisms, including yeasts, which are the Yeasts are found in a variety of habitats,
subject of many patents for improving plant nutrition including soil, water, plants, animals, and insects,
from organic sources of phosphorus, sulphur, and although being less common than bacteria.
nitrogen (Alkharabsheh et al., 2021; Ndoung et al., Certain yeasts may live in the tissues of plants
2021). and form commensal or parasitic partnerships with
A key player in this situation is yeast, a mammals. Notably, opportunistic human infections
kind of fungal cell that has the capacity to absorb are caused by Candida albicans. Certain conditions
large quantities of nitrogen and carbon. Some with low oxygen, temperature, or water potential
yeasts are facultatively anaerobic and can ferment are conducive to yeast adaptation. They support
carbohydrates. They thrive in conditions are favored insects like Drosophila spp. and have an impact on
by perennial plants, low-disturbance soils, stable Drosophila physiology and reproduction, therefore
organic residues with high carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) adding to the food chain (Fenner et al., 2022;
ratios, slower recycling rates, and slightly acidic Ljunggren et al., 2019; Naranjo-Ortiz & Gabaldón,
pH. Yeasts reproduce mainly through asexual 2019). Marine filter feeders also eat yeast.
cell fission and budding, adapting to various In the biogeochemical cycle, filamentous
environments, including liquid suspension, biofilms, fungus and bacteria are more important in microbial
and soil, including sand grains. Extensive research ecology than yeasts (Table 1). But yeasts, which use
on yeast development has revealed its potential a variety of carbon sources to transform plant waste
to support plant growth in acidic soil and its high into carbon dioxide, are essential saprophytes in
proliferation capacity in endophytic environments, the carbon cycle (Frey-Klett et al., 2011; Gupta et
making it a valuable candidate for applications like al., 2017). While most yeasts absorb ammonium
soil bioremediation (Lynd et al., 2002; Schlegel & ions or amino acids as organic nitrogen, others
Jannasch, 2006). contribute to the nitrogen cycle by decreasing nitrate
or ammonia nitrite. Furthermore, certain yeasts are
MATERIALS AND METHODS sulfur auxotrophs, meaning they may decrease
sulfate (Frey-Klett et al., 2011; Gupta et al., 2017;
The study addressed the use of yeasts to
Naranjo-Ortiz & Gabaldón, 2019).
enhance plant development in acidic soil by reviewing
over around 85 published scientific publications Importance of Yeast
(2001–2022) from a variety of backgrounds and For thousands of years, yeast has been used
archives. The papers that highlighted the role of traditionally to manufacture bread, wine, and beer.
yeasts in soil acidity, the interaction between plants The products of modern yeast biotechnologies
and soil, and the Green Revolution in improving soil have an influence on many economically significant
quality were incorporated. industries, including as food and beverages,
chemicals, industrial enzymes, medications,
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION agriculture, and the environment (Table 2) (Sicard
& Legras, 2011). The most widely used bacterium,
Yeast and Ecology
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is the primary yeast
Yeasts, classed as unicellular fungus,
cell factory in biotechnology and produces the
create spores externally during their reproductive
world’s most valuable biotechnological product,
phases, mostly by budding, occasionally utilizing
industrial and drinking ethanol (Parapouli et al.,
198
Additionally, yeasts contribute to environmental to enhance nutrient availability and regulate the
benefits by reducing pollutants. Certain yeasts, rumen environment in domestic livestock, such as
including Candida utilis, efficiently detoxify chemical cattle, promoting animal growth or milk production
contaminants from industrial effluents and act as bio- (Elghandour et al., 2020). Yeasts may scavenge
sorbents for heavy metals. Yeasts like Candida utilis oxygen to protect rumen bacteria from oxidative
can also effectively remove nitrogen and carbon from stress or provide dicarboxylic acids to stimulate
organic wastes (Ferraz et al., 2019). In agriculture, rumen bacterial growth (Elghandour et al., 2020;
living cultures of S. cerevisiae have been shown Wang et al., 2022).
While most yeasts contribute positively to million acres. According to Von Uexküll & Mutert
human existence, some can be opportunistically (1995), Oxisols and Ultisols make up the majority
harmful. Candida albicans, causing candidiasis, is of tropical acid soil worldwide, making up around
a common opportunistic yeast infection, particularly 21.87% and 18.4% of all tropical soil, respectively
affecting immunocompromised individuals (Pappas (Fig. 1).
et al., 2018). In certain cases, C. albicans infections Acidic soils are characterized by elevated
in AIDS patients can be fatal. Yeast recombinant levels of toxic elements such as aluminum (Al),
DNA technology has enabled the production of manganese (Mn), and iron (Fe), along with
novel human medicinal molecules, showcasing deficiencies in calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg),
the beneficial medical properties of yeasts (Mayer potassium (K), and nitrogen (N). A significant
et al., 2013). Yeasts also play a crucial role as portion of global acid soils exhibits chemical
experimental models in biomedical research, imbalances, insufficient cation retention capacity,
particularly in cancer, pharmacology, toxicology, nutrient losses, and suboptimal crop performance.
virology, and human genetics. Soil pH serves as an indicator of acidity, providing
insights into nutrient availability, the presence of
Extent And World Distribution Of Acid Soil
free lime (calcium carbonate), and the abundance
About 3.95 billion hectares of the world’s
of specific ions like sodium, hydrogen, aluminum,
free Iceland are covered in acid soil. Ultisols make
and manganese (Fageria et al., 2008).
up 9.3% of the world’s land area, or about 12,347
Soil acidity formation serves as an indicator of component that is mostly composed of kaolinite and
weathering and leaching within the soil (Fageria et sesquioxides, which leads to a very low CEC and
al., 2008). Widespread soil acidity poses challenges leaching losses of nutrients (Castellini et al., 2021;
to agricultural productivity globally. The soil’s acidic Murphy, 2014).
nature results from substantial percolation, leading to
Types of Soil Acidity
leaching and the generation of biological acids. Plant
The active acidity in the soil solution is
roots and the dissolution of CO2 in water release H+
quantified based on the concentration of H+ ions,
ions, contributing to soil acidification (Danh et al.,
influenced by carbonic acid (H2CO3), water-
2009). Acidification occurs when leaching causes soil
soluble organic acids, and chemically acidic salts.
solution acidity, replacing negatively charged acidic
The immediate impact of active acidity on plant
cations with H+ ions and Al(OH)3. Reduced yields
development and soil microbes is determined by the
and nutrient utilization were followed as a result of
presence of H+ and Al3+ ions, which precipitate on
the displaced cations being leached deeper into the
soil surfaces, indicating exchange acidity. Adsorbed
soil profile and causing soil acidity dominance in the
and dissolved organic ions maintain a dynamic
exchange complex (Chintala et al., 2012).
equilibrium, allowing a swift transition between
Higher Al3+ concentrations are seen in lower
forms. The exchangeable H+ and Al3+ ions contribute
pH soil solutions and cation exchange sites. Both
to soil acidity, readily exchangeable in a basic saline
natural and man-made processes, such as land
solution like KCl (Agegnehu et al., 2021).
clearance and contemporary agricultural methods
Buffer pH, measured as the proportion of
that include overuse of chemical fertilizers like urea
H+ ions associated with clay and organic matter in
and ammonium nitrate, or cation loss from crop
a buffer solution, reflects the soil’s buffer potential.
harvesting, can cause soil acidification. In some
Adsorbed H+ and Al3+ ions migrate into the soil solution,
tropical soils, pollution and acid rain increase the
representing potential, accumulated, or reserve
acidity of the soil by introducing H+ ions and making
acidity. The bulk of H+ ions in acidic soil is absorbed by
the acidity worse (Chintala et al., 2012; Danh et al.,
the soil (reserve acidity) (Thomas, 2018; Elita et al.,
2009; Mijangos et al., 2010; Zubrzycki et al., 2014).
2022). The relationship between active and reserve
The main causes of acidity in soil are a mix
acidity is influenced by soil properties, including clay
of human and natural activities. High-yielding crop
type and quantity, organic matter content, and free
cultivation, acidic parent material, organic matter
lime in the soil. The reserve-to-active acidity ratio
decomposition, ammonium nitrification, and a lack
indicates the soil’s buffer potential, with sandy soil
of buffer capacity from insufficient clay and organic
having lower buffer capacity compared to clay-rich
matter are some of the factors that cause acidification
soil like silt loam. The calculation of pH buffer helps
(Bünemann et al., 2018; Cai et al., 2015; Yan et al.,
determine the lime required to neutralize a significant
2020; Zhang et al., 2019). When there are more
portion of the reserve acidity when the soil pH is 6.3
acidic cations, such as hydrogen (H+) and aluminum
or below (Zibilske, 1998).
(Al3+), than alkaline cations, such as calcium (Ca2+),
Acidity in the soil adversely affects plant
magnesium (Mg2+), potassium (K+), and sodium
growth and productivity, leading to increased weed
(Na+), the soil is considered acidic (Bedigian, 2005).
growth, reduced soil cover, and the potential for soil
A number characteristics of the soil may be used
erosion (Barth et al., 2018). Aluminum toxicity in the
to determine its acidity, and Ultisols and Oxisols can
subsurface soil is a major concern associated with
be categorized using soil taxonomy. An argillic horizon
soil acidity (Laekemariam et al., 2016). Low pH in
in the subsoil and subsurface clay accumulation in
topsoil affects nutrient availability, hinders nodulation
the B horizon as a result of leaching in a tropical,
of legumes, and reduces nitrogen fixation in pastures.
humid climate are characteristics of Ultisols. To be
The impact of aluminum and manganese toxicity
classified as high-weather soil, a mineralogical study
on root development and soil biota is significant.
must demonstrate that kaolanoitite and sesquioxides
Elevated levels of Al and Mn released into the soil
are dominant. Tropical soils are rich in kaolinite, a
solution contribute to reduced soil cover, increased
non-expansive 1:1 phyllosilicate with a low surface
runoff, water contamination, and deposition in
area and cation exchange capacity (Shamshuddin &
streams (Barth et al., 2018).
Anda, 2008). In comparison to Ultisols, Oxisols have
Soluble aluminum concentrations exceeding 2
undergone greater weathering and have an oxic
mg/kg or exchangeable aluminum levels exceeding
horizon in the subsurface. They also include a clay
5% can be toxic to plant roots. Topsoil with sufficient
202
bacteria or mycorrhizal fungi, on plant nutrition is one of the main goals of this field of study. This
has long been recognized, recent research information may then be used to create microbial
has unveiled the broader spectrum of plant- communities that are ideal for carrying out particular
associated microorganisms and their potential to tasks.
replace artificial agricultural inputs. Advances in
Microbial Traits and Bioavailability of Nutrients
understanding the composition and dynamics of
for Plants
rhizosphere microbiomes reveal that plants exert
As Jacoby et al. (2017) discuss, three main
an influence on the microbiome, likely through root
mechanisms are frequently proposed to explain
exudates, and bacteria have adapted to thrive in
how microbial activity contributes to plant growth:
the rhizosphere niche. However, the mechanisms
controlling plant hormone signaling, warding off
underlying these interactions and the activities
or outcompeting pathogenic microbial strains,
driving changes in the microbiome remain largely
and boosting the bioavailability of nutrients borne
unknown (Kuzyakov & Xu, 2013; Liu et al., 2022).
from the soil. Much of the nutrients in natural
Interconnection of Plants with Soil Microbes ecosystems—such as N, P, and S—are bound in
While soil is often viewed solely as a source organic molecules and thus only partially available
of nutrients for plants, it functions as a dynamic to plants. In order for plants to get organic forms of
ecosystem that houses a diverse community of N, P, and S, soil microorganisms like bacteria and
bacteria, fungi, protists, and animals. The interactions fungus must be able to metabolically break down
between plants and soil-dwelling organisms span and mineralize these forms. Essential nutrients
a wide range of ecological possibilities, including including ammonium, nitrate, phosphate, and
competitive, exploitative, neutral, commensal, and sulfate are released into the soil as inorganic forms
mutualistic relationships. In contemporary plant as a result of microbial cell turnover, cell lysis, or
science, the majority of research has focused on protozoic predation (Adomako et al., 2022; Grzyb et
mitigating pathogenic impacts, such as herbivore al., 2021; Jacoby et al., 2017).
and infection, or alleviating abiotic stress conditions Microorganisms are essential for controlling
(Liu et al., 2022; Lynd et al., 2002). However, the nitrogen recycling and carbon cycle, among
there has also been a longstanding interest in other soil activities. Plants’ capacity to absorb vital
understanding the beneficial ecological interactions nutrients like N, P, and micronutrients is determined
that support plant development. For instance, in by the variety and total number of microbial species
the latter half of the 19th century, mycorrhizal fungi present in the soil. Plant variety and abundance
and bacteria in nodulated legumes were recognized have the power to affect the whole soil ecology
as root symbionts. In the 1950s, crop seeds by generating exudates from their roots that may
were coated with bacterial cultures (Azotobacter either promote or inhibit the growth of particular
chroococcum or Bacillus megaterium) to enhance microbial species. Less than 10% to 20% of a
yield and growth. Since the 2000s, research focus plant’s total carbon output is released into the soil
has shifted from identifying specific bacterial strains by plants, which also enriches the soil by providing
to utilizing metagenomics to map the diversity and microorganisms with food and energy (Hattori et
abundance of the root microbiome (Larimer et al., al., 2019; Verbruggen et al., 2017). As a reciprocal
2014; Meng et al., 2015). relationship, bacteria feed plant roots nutrients
According to sequencing studies, a wide and encourage the growth of particular microbial
variety of microbial species are present in the species, mainly yeast, to protect plants from
roots of plants, making the rhizosphere niche a dangerous diseases (Hayat et al., 2010; Jacoby et
hotspot for biological diversity. In an attempt to al., 2017; Xiang et al., 2022).
replicate beneficial microbial activities in controlled A variety of plants depend on the fungus-
experimental settings, recent studies have focused to-bacterium ratio (F:B), with different ratios being
on building synthetic communities (SynComs) from desired for different crops. Plant preferences are
strains of common rhizosphere species (Jacoby influenced by the F:B ratio; for some vegetables
et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2022; Yamamoto et al., (carrots, lettuce, broccoli, cole crops), values
2018). Gaining a mechanistic knowledge of how soil between 0.3 and 0.8 are excellent; for other
bacteria improve plant development and defense vegetables (wheat, maize, and tomatoes), values
204
between 0.8 and 1.1 are preferred. In wooded soils, key to a potential solution. Microbial inoculants,
trees grow best at a F:B ratio of 10:1, whereas historically applied in agriculture, have proven
lawns do best at a ratio of 0.5 to 1.1 (Gondal et al., effectiveness in broad-scale inoculation. More
2021; Hayat et al., 2010). recently, it has been shown that using yeasts such
Yeast is beneficial to most plants because it Metschnikowia, Pichia, Candid, Saccharomycopsis,
helps to prevent infections, improve plant health, and Schwanniomyces, and Rhodotorula can enhance
stimulate growth by producing enzymes. Beneficial soil quality and plant development (Freimoser et al.,
yeast inhibits the growth of infections and illnesses 2019; Wang et al., 2022).
by competing with harmful bacteria. According to Every aspect of the soil environment in the
studies, pathogenic fungi that cause plant mortality natural world have changed as a result of human
or substantial crop output impacts include Pythium, activity, especially the use of chemical plant
Rhizoctonia, and Verticillium. Competition for protection and the intensification of agriculture.
nutrients and accessible space is thought to be the The ability of the ecosystem to survive and operate
main cause of yeast response in acidic soils, and properly may be impacted by this change (Nunes et
yeasts with a variety of antagonistic traits have a al., 2020). Plant variety and productivity are impacted
better chance of avoiding disease (Ferraz et al., by changes in soil quality, and human activity aims
2019; Hernández-Fernández et al., 2021; Kowalska to maximize the productive attributes of soil. The
et al., 2022). physiochemical and microbiological characteristics
Furthermore, in exchange for the plant’s of the soil must be taken into account for appropriate
carbon, mycorrhizal fungi develop symbiotic agricultural management (Hernández-Fernández et
partnerships with plant roots, helping to solubilize al., 2021). The sensitivity of soil quality, as shown
phosphorus and transfer soil nutrients to the plant. by the activity and variety of microorganisms, is a
Endomycorrhizal fungi, which are typically found subject of inquiry for various experts. It has been
with grasses, row crops, vegetables, and shrubs, discovered that anthropogenic factors—particularly
grow inside root cells, whereas ectomycorrhizal agricultural practices—have a major influence on
fungi, which are connected to trees, develop on the the quantity and quality of organisms that live in soil
surface layers of roots. It has been demonstrated that environments (Frey-Klett et al., 2011).
the presence of baker’s yeast benefits arbuscular
mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, a kind of endomycorrhizal CONCLUSION
fungi and their hyphal development enables
In the upcoming years, the large expansion
colonizing cucumber roots (Freimoser et al., 2019;
in the world population is predicted to drive up
Zhang et al., 2020).
demand for agricultural methods, including the use
Agricultural Context: A “Fresh” Green of conventional fertilizers. This growth produces
Revolution in the Face of Soil Quality and accumulates residues in addition to the
Through the development of improved crop depletion of organic matter in soils. The levels of
plants through targeted breeding and sophisticated microbial populations are impacted by changes
genetic manipulations, as well as advances in in physicochemical qualities, underscoring the
chemical inputs such as pesticides, insecticides, necessity for creative and long-term agricultural
and chemical fertilizers, the Green Revolution—a solutions. In lieu of synthetic fertilizers, especially
pivotal movement in the 20th century—markedly in acidic soils, this paper suggests using yeasts
increased global food production. To meet the as plant promoters to increase agricultural output
needs of a growing global population for food, fuel, both directly and indirectly. Yeasts are a useful
and fiber while addressing changing soil quality microorganism for agriculture because of their
over the course of the century would require a natural qualities and practical applications. They
new agricultural revolution due to the significant are the perfect platform for evolutionary study
environmental costs involved with fertilizer inputs applicable in field studies because of their variety
(John & Babu, 2021). of species, simplicity of laboratory cultivation, and
A new agricultural revolution—often called fast adaptation for experimental testing, including
a “bio-revolution”—that stresses biological inputs reverse genetics approaches. Future biofertilizers
like improved crops and the microbiome holds the may be based on the discovery, creation, and
205
refinement of efficient yeast inoculant consortia Barth, V. P., Reardon, C. L., Coffey, T., Klein, A. M.,
that are tolerant of different plant species and McFarland, C., Huggins, D. R., & Sullivan, T.
environmental conditions. These biofertilizers have S. (2018). Stratification of soil chemical and
the ability to provide a steady supply of food, help microbial properties under no-till after liming.
Applied Soil Ecology, 130, 169–177. https://doi.
save the environment, and provide a workable
org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.06.001
solution since they are affordable, useful, and
socially acceptable. Bedigian, D. (2005). Sustainable soils. The place of organic
matter in sustaining soils and their productivity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Economic Botany, 59(4), 410–410. https://doi.
org/10.1663/0013-0001(2005)059[0410:DFABR
The authors acknowledge the Universiti E]2.0.CO;2
Putra Malaysia (UPM) supported my candidature by Botha, A. (2011). The importance and ecology of yeasts in
providing support for this study. The author thanked soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(1), 1–8.
to friends, colleagues, and staff of the Department https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.001
of Land Management, UPM for their moral support,
Bruner, J., & Fox, G. (2020). Novel non-cerevisiae
technical assistance, and contribution in various
saccharomyces yeast species used in beer
aspects. and alcoholic beverage fermentations.
Fermentation, 6(4), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/
REFERENCES fermentation6040116
Adomako, M. O., Roiloa, S., & Yu, F.-H. (2022). Potential Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De
roles of soil microorganisms in regulating Deyn, G., De Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen,
the effect of soil nutrient heterogeneity V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., Pulleman, M.,
on plant performance. Microorganisms, Sukkel, W., Van Groenigen, J. W., & Brussaard,
10(12), 2399. https://doi.org/10.3390/ L. (2018). Soil quality – A critical review. Soil
microorganisms10122399 Biology and Biochemistry, 120, 105–125. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030
Agegnehu, G., Amede, T., Erkossa, T., Yirga, C., Henry,
C., Tyler, R., Nosworthy, M. G., Beyene, S., & Butinar, L., Santos, S., Spencer-Martins, I., Oren, A., &
Sileshi, G. W. (2021). Extent and management Gunde-Cimerman, N. (2005). Yeast diversity in
of acid soils for sustainable crop production hypersaline habitats. FEMS Microbiology Letters,
system in the tropical agroecosystems: A review. 244(2), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — femsle.2005.01.043
Soil & Plant Science, 71(9), 852–869. https://doi.
org/10.1080/09064710.2021.1954239 Cai, Z., Wang, B., Xu, M., Zhang, H., He, X., Zhang, L.,
& Gao, S. (2015). Intensified soil acidification
Ahuja, I., Kissen, R., & Bones, A. M. (2012). Phytoalexins from chemical N fertilization and prevention
in defense against pathogens. Trends in Plant by manure in an 18-year field experiment in
Science, 17(2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. the red soil of southern China. Journal of Soils
tplants.2011.11.002 and Sediments, 15(2), 260–270. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11368-014-0989-y
Aitzhanova, A., Oleinikova, Y., Mounier, J., Hymery, N.,
Leyva Salas, M., Amangeldi, A., Saubenova, Carmona-Hernandez, S., Reyes-Pérez, J., Chiquito-
M., Alimzhanova, M., Ashimuly, K., & Sadanov, Contreras, R., Rincon-Enriquez, G., Cerdan-
A. (2021). Dairy associations for the targeted Cabrera, C., & Hernandez-Montiel, L. (2019).
control of opportunistic Candida. World Journal Biocontrol of postharvest fruit fungal diseases by
of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 37(8), 143. bacterial antagonists: A review. Agronomy, 9(3),
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-021-03096-1 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9030121
Alkharabsheh, H. M., Seleiman, M. F., Battaglia, M. Castellini, M., Diacono, M., Gattullo, C. E., & Stellacci,
L., Shami, A., Jalal, R. S., Alhammad, B. A., A. M. (2021). Sustainable agriculture and soil
Almutairi, K. F., & Al-Saif, A. M. (2021). Biochar conservation. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4146.
and its broad impacts in soil quality and fertility, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094146
nutrient leaching and crop productivity: A review.
Agronomy, 11(5), 993. https://doi.org/10.3390/ Chintala, R., McDonald, L. M., & Bryan, W. B. (2012).
agronomy11050993 Effect of soil water and nutrients on productivity
of kentucky bluegrass system in acidic soils.
206
Journal of Plant Nutrition, 35(2), 288–303. Faniyi, T. O., Adegbeye, M. J., Elghandour, M. M. M.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2012.636131 Y., Pilego, A. B., Salem, A. Z. M., Olaniyi, T.
A., Adediran, O., & Adewumi, M. K. (2019).
Christel, A., Maron, P.-A., & Ranjard, L. (2021). Impact
Role of diverse fermentative factors towards
of farming systems on soil ecological quality: A
microbial community shift in ruminants. Journal
meta-analysis. Environmental Chemistry Letters,
of Applied Microbiology, 127(1), 2–11. https://
19(6), 4603–4625. https://doi.org/10.1007/
doi.org/10.1111/jam.14212
s10311-021-01302-y
Faria-Oliveira, F., Diniz, R. H. S., Godoy-Santos, F., Piló,
Danh, L. T., Truong, P., Mammucari, R., Tran, T., & Foster,
F. B., Mezadri, H., Castro, I. M., & Brandão, R. L.
N. (2009). Vetiver grass, Vetiveria zizanioides:
(2015). The role of yeast and lactic acid bacteria
A choice plant for phytoremediation of heavy
in the production of fermented beverages in
metals and organic wastes. International Journal
South America. In A. H. A. Eissa (Ed.), Food
of Phytoremediation, 11(8), 664–691. https://doi.
Production and Industry. InTech. https://doi.
org/10.1080/15226510902787302
org/10.5772/60877
Dawson, C. J., & Hilton, J. (2011). Fertiliser availability
Fenner, E. D., Scapini, T., Da Costa Diniz, M., Giehl,
in a resource-limited world: Production and
A., Treichel, H., Álvarez-Pérez, S., & Alves, S.
recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus. Food
L. (2022). Nature’s most fruitful threesome:
Policy, 36, S14–S22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
The relationship between yeasts, insects, and
foodpol.2010.11.012
angiosperms. Journal of Fungi, 8(10), 984.
Di Canito, A., Mateo-Vargas, M. A., Mazzieri, M., Cantoral, https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8100984
J., Foschino, R., Cordero-Bueso, G., & Vigentini,
Ferraz, P., Cássio, F., & Lucas, C. (2019). Potential of
I. (2021). The role of yeasts as biocontrol agents
yeasts as biocontrol agents of the phytopathogen
for pathogenic fungi on postharvest grapes:
causing cacao witches’ broom disease: Is
A review. Foods, 10(7), 1650. https://doi.
microbial warfare a solution? Frontiers in
org/10.3390/foods10071650
Microbiology, 10, 1766. https://doi.org/10.3389/
Elghandour, M. M. Y., Tan, Z. L., Abu Hafsa, S. H., fmicb.2019.01766
Adegbeye, M. J., Greiner, R., Ugbogu, E. A.,
Fleet, G. H. (2011). Yeast spoilage of foods and beverages.
Cedillo Monroy, J., & Salem, A. Z. M. (2020).
In The Yeasts (pp. 53–63). Elsevier. https://doi.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a probiotic feed
org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52149-1.00005-7
additive to non and pseudo‐ruminant feeding: A
review. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 128(3), Freimoser, F. M., Rueda-Mejia, M. P., Tilocca, B., & Migheli,
658–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14416 Q. (2019). Biocontrol yeasts: Mechanisms and
applications. World Journal of Microbiology
Elita, N., Illahi, A. K., Sari, D. A., Yulensri, Y., Maulina, F.,
and Biotechnology, 35(10), 154. https://doi.
Karmaita, Y., Kurniasih, D., Yulita, R., & Yanti,
org/10.1007/s11274-019-2728-4
R. (2022). Effect of types of organic materials
and microbial enrichment on C/N ratio, nutrition Frey-Klett, P., Burlinson, P., Deveau, A., Barret, M.,
of compost, and microbe population with Tarkka, M., & Sarniguet, A. (2011). Bacterial-
Trichoderma sp. indigenous activators. Res fungal interactions: Hyphens between
Militaris, 12(6), 205–217. https://resmilitaris. agricultural, clinical, environmental, and food
net/menu-script/index.php/resmilitaris/article/ microbiologists. Microbiology and Molecular
view/2588 Biology Reviews, 75(4), 583–609. https://doi.
org/10.1128/MMBR.00020-11
Erten, H., Ağirman, B., Gündüz, C. P. B., Çarşanba,
E., Sert, S., Bircan, S., & Tangüler, H. (2014). Gadanho, M., Almeida, J. M., & Sampaio, J. P. (2003).
Importance of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in Assessment of yeast diversity in a marine
food processing. In A. Malik, Z. Erginkaya, S. environment in the south of Portugal by
Ahmad, & H. Erten (Eds.), Food Processing: microsatellite-primed PCR. Antonie van
Strategies for Quality Assessment (pp. 351–378). Leeuwenhoek, 84(3), 217–227. https://doi.
Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- org/10.1023/A:1026038213195
1-4939-1378-7_14
Gazey, C., & Andrew, J. (2009). Soil pH in northern and
Fageria, N. K., Baligar, V. C., & Li, Y. C. (2008). The role southern areas of the WA wheatbelt. Bulletin
of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop 4761. https://www.wheatbeltnrm.org.au/sites/
yields in the twenty first century. Journal of default/files/knowledge_hub/documents/North_
Plant Nutrition, 31(6), 1121–1157. https://doi. and_south_pH_report_151208.pdf
org/10.1080/01904160802116068
207
Geronikou, A., Larsen, N., Lillevang, S. K., & Jespersen, and health. Frontiers in Sustainable Food
L. (2022). Occurrence and identification of Systems, 5, 644559. https://doi.org/10.3389/
yeasts in production of white-brined cheese. fsufs.2021.644559
Microorganisms, 10(6), 1079. https://doi.
Johnson, E. A. (2013). Biotechnology of non-
org/10.3390/microorganisms10061079
Saccharomyces yeasts—The basidiomycetes.
Gondal, A. H., Farooq, Q., Hussain, I., & Toor, M. D. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(17),
(2021). Role of microbes in plant growth and 7563–7577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-
food preservation. Agrinula: Jurnal Agroteknologi 013-5046-z
Dan Perkebunan, 4(2), 106–121. https://doi.
Jwaideh, M. A. A., Sutanudjaja, E. H., & Dalin, C. (2022).
org/10.36490/agri.v4i2.158
Global impacts of nitrogen and phosphorus
Grzyb, A., Wolna-Maruwka, A., & Niewiadomska, A. (2021). fertiliser use for major crops on aquatic
The significance of microbial transformation of biodiversity. The International Journal of Life
nitrogen compounds in the light of integrated Cycle Assessment, 27(8), 1058–1080. https://
crop management. Agronomy, 11(7), 1415. doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02078-1
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071415
Kaur, S., Samota, M. K., Choudhary, M., Choudhary, M.,
Gupta, A., Gupta, R., & Singh, R. L. (2017). Microbes and Pandey, A. K., Sharma, A., & Thakur, J. (2022).
environment. In R. L. Singh (Ed.), Principles and How do plants defend themselves against
Applications of Environmental Biotechnology pathogens-Biochemical mechanisms and
for a Sustainable Future (pp. 43–84). Springer genetic interventions. Physiology and Molecular
Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10- Biology of Plants, 28(2), 485–504. https://doi.
1866-4_3 org/10.1007/s12298-022-01146-y
Hattori, D., Kenzo, T., Shirahama, T., Harada, Y., Kowalska, J., Krzymińska, J., & Tyburski, J. (2022).
Kendawang, J. J., Ninomiya, I., & Sakurai, K. Yeasts as a potential biological agent in plant
(2019). Degradation of soil nutrients and slow disease protection and yield improvement—A
recovery of biomass following shifting cultivation short review. Agriculture, 12(9), 1404. https://doi.
in the heath forests of Sarawak, Malaysia. Forest org/10.3390/agriculture12091404
Ecology and Management, 432, 467–477.
Kuzyakov, Y., & Xu, X. (2013). Competition between roots
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.051
and microorganisms for nitrogen: Mechanisms
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. and ecological relevance. New Phytologist,
(2010). Soil beneficial bacteria and their role 198(3), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/
in plant growth promotion: A review. Annals nph.12235
of Microbiology, 60(4), 579–598. https://doi.
Laekemariam, F., Kibret, K., Mamo, T., Karltun, E.,
org/10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1
& Gebrekidan, H. (2016). Physiographic
Hernández-Fernández, M., Cordero-Bueso, G., Ruiz- characteristics of agricultural lands and farmers’
Muñoz, M., & Cantoral, J. M. (2021). Culturable soil fertility management practices in Wolaita
yeasts as biofertilizers and biopesticides for a zone, Southern Ethiopia. Environmental Systems
sustainable agriculture: A comprehensive review. Research, 5(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/
Plants, 10(5), 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/ s40068-016-0076-z
plants10050822
Larimer, A. L., Clay, K., & Bever, J. D. (2014). Synergism
Howieson, J. G., & Ewing, M. A. (1986). Acid tolerance and context dependency of interactions between
in the Rhizobium meliloti–Medicago symbiosis. arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia with
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, a prairie legume. Ecology, 95(4), 1045–1054.
37(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9860055 https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0025.1
Jacoby, R., Peukert, M., Succurro, A., Koprivova, Liu, Y., He, G., He, T., & Saleem, M. (2022). Signaling
A., & Kopriva, S. (2017). The role of soil and detoxification strategies in plant-microbes
microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition— symbiosis under heavy metal stress:Amechanistic
Current knowledge and future directions. understanding. Microorganisms, 11(1), 69. https://
Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1617. https://doi. doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010069
org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01617
Ljunggren, J., Borrero-Echeverry, F., Chakraborty, A.,
John, D. A., & Babu, G. R. (2021). Lessons from the Lindblom, T. U. T., Hedenström, E., Karlsson,
aftermaths of green revolution on food system M., Witzgall, P., & Bengtsson, M. (2019). Yeast
208
volatomes differentially affect larval feeding in Murphy, B. W. (2014). Soil organic matter and soil function
an insect herbivore. Applied and Environmental – Review of the literature and underlying data.
Microbiology, 85(21), e01761-19. https://doi. Department of the Environment, Canberra,
org/10.1128/AEM.01761-19 Australia. https://ecaf.org/wp-content/
uploads/2021/02/Soil_Organic_Matter-Brian_
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., Van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius,
Murphy.pdf
I. S. (2002). Microbial cellulose utilization:
Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiology Naranjo‐Ortiz, M. A., & Gabaldón, T. (2019). Fungal
and Molecular Biology Reviews, 66(3), 506– evolution: Major ecological adaptations and
577. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506- evolutionary transitions. Biological Reviews,
577.2002 94(4), 1443–1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/
brv.12510
Mack, M., Wannemacher, M., Hobl, B., Pietschmann, P., &
Hock, B. (2009). Comparison of two expression Ndoung, O. C. N., Figueiredo, C. C. D., & Ramos, M.
platforms in respect to protein yield and quality: L. G. (2021). A scoping review on biochar-
Pichia pastoris versus Pichia angusta. Protein based fertilizers: Enrichment techniques and
Expression and Purification, 66(2), 165–171. agro-environmental application. Heliyon, 7(12),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2009.03.010 e08473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.
e08473
Maicas, S. (2020). The role of yeasts in fermentation
processes. Microorganisms, 8(8), 1142. https:// Ngoune Tandzi, L., Mutengwa, C., Ngonkeu, E., & Gracen,
doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081142 V. (2018). Breeding maize for tolerance to acidic
soils: A review. Agronomy, 8(6), 84. https://doi.
Malassigné, S., Minard, G., Vallon, L., Martin, E., Valiente
org/10.3390/agronomy8060084
Moro, C., & Luis, P. (2021). Diversity and
functions of yeast communities associated with Nunes, F. C., De Jesus Alves, L., De Carvalho, C. C. N.,
insects. Microorganisms, 9(8), 1552. https://doi. Gross, E., De Marchi Soares, T., & Prasad, M. N.
org/10.3390/microorganisms9081552 V. (2020). Soil as a complex ecological system
for meeting food and nutritional security. In
Mayer, F. L., Wilson, D., & Hube, B. (2013). Candida
Climate Change and Soil Interactions (pp. 229–
albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence,
269). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-
4(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.4161/
12-818032-7.00009-6
viru.22913
Pappas, P. G., Lionakis, M. S., Arendrup, M. C.,
McLeod, G., Gries, R., Von Reuß, S. H., Rahe, J. E.,
Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., & Kullberg, B. J. (2018).
McIntosh, R., König, W. A., & Gries, G. (2005).
Invasive candidiasis. Nature Reviews Disease
The pathogen causing Dutch elm disease makes
Primers, 4(1), 18026. https://doi.org/10.1038/
host trees attract insect vectors. Proceedings
nrdp.2018.26
of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
272(1580), 2499–2503. https://doi.org/10.1098/ Parapouli, M., Vasileiadis, A., Afendra, A. S., & Hatziloukas,
rspb.2005.3202 E. (2020). Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its
industrial applications. AIMS Microbiology, 6(1),
Meng, L., Zhang, A., Wang, F., Han, X., Wang, D., &
1-31. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2020001
Li, S. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
and rhizobium facilitate nitrogen uptake and Raasch-Fernandes, L. D., Bonaldo, S. M., de Jesus
transfer in soybean/maize intercropping system. Rodrigues, D., Vieira-Junior, G. M., Schwan-
Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 339. https://doi. Estrada, K. R. F., da Silva, C. R., Verçosa, A. G.
org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00339 A., de Oliveira, D. L., & Debiasi, B. W. (2019).
Induction of phytoalexins and proteins related
Mijangos, I., Albizu, I., Epelde, L., Amezaga, I., Mendarte,
to pathogenesis in plants treated with extracts
S., & Garbisu, C. (2010). Effects of liming
of cutaneous secretions of southern Amazonian
on soil properties and plant performance
Bufonidae amphibians. PLoS ONE, 14(1).
of temperate mountainous grasslands.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211020
Journal of Environmental Management,
91(10), 2066–2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Rozanov, A. S., Pershina, E. G., Bogacheva, N. V.,
jenvman.2010.05.011 Shlyakhtun, V., Sychev, A. A., & Peltek,
S. E. (2020). Diversity and occurrence
Muccilli, S., & Restuccia, C. (2015). Bioprotective role of
of methylotrophic yeasts used in genetic
yeasts. Microorganisms, 3(4), 588–611. https://
engineering. Vavilov Journal of Genetics
doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms3040588
209
and Breeding, 24(2), 149–157. https://doi. sustainable agriculture: Current trends and
org/10.18699/VJ20.602 future perspectives. Minerals, 11(12), 1336.
https://doi.org/10.3390/min11121336
Schlegel, H. G., & Jannasch, H. W. (2006). Prokaryotes
and their habitats. In M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Thomas, G. W. (2018). Soil pH and soil acidity. In D.
Rosenberg, K.-H. Schleifer, & E. Stackebrandt L. Sparks, A. L. Page, P. A. Helmke, R. H.
(Eds.), The Prokaryotes (pp. 137–184). Springer Loeppert, P. N. Soltanpour, M. A. Tabatabai, C.
New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30741- T. Johnston, & M. E. Sumner (Eds.), SSSA Book
9_6 Series (pp. 475–490). Soil Science Society of
America, American Society of Agronomy. https://
Shamshuddin, J., & Anda, M. (2008). Charge properties
doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16
of soils in Malaysia dominated by kaolinite,
gibbsite, goethite and hematite. Bulletin of Verbruggen, E., Pena, R., Fernandez, C. W., & Soong,
the Geological Society of Malaysia, 54, 27-31. J. L. (2017). Mycorrhizal interactions with
https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm54200805 saprotrophs and impact on soil carbon storage.
In Mycorrhizal Mediation of Soil (pp. 441–460).
Sicard, D., & Legras, J.-L. (2011). Bread, beer and wine:
Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-
Yeast domestication in the Saccharomyces
804312-7.00024-3
sensu stricto complex. Comptes Rendus
Biologies, 334(3), 229–236. https://doi. Voidarou, C., Antoniadou, Μ., Rozos, G., Tzora,
org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.016 A., Skoufos, I., Varzakas, T., Lagiou, A., &
Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020). Fermentative foods:
Singh, A., Kumar, M., Chakdar, H., Pandiyan, K., Kumar,
Microbiology, biochemistry, potential human
S. C., Zeyad, M. T., Singh, B. N., Ravikiran,
health benefits and public health issues.
K. T., Mahto, A., Srivastava, A. K., & Saxena,
Foods, 10(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/
A. K. (2022). Influence of host genotype in
foods10010069
establishing root associated microbiome of
indica rice cultivars for plant growth promotion. Von Uexküll, H. R., & Mutert, E. (1995). Global extent,
Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 1033158. https:// development and economic impact of acid
doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1033158 soils. Plant and Soil, 171(1), 1–15. https://doi.
org/10.1007/BF00009558
Steglińska, A., Kołtuniak, A., Berłowska, J., Czyżowska,
A., Szulc, J., Cieciura-Włoch, W., Okrasa, Wang, J., Zhao, G., Zhuang, Y., Chai, J., & Zhang, N.
M., Kręgiel, D., & Gutarowska, B. (2022). (2022). Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
Metschnikowia pulcherrima as a biocontrol culture promotes the performance of fattening
agent against potato (Solanum tuberosum) sheep by enhancing nutrients digestibility and
pathogens. Agronomy, 12(10), 2546. https://doi. rumen development. Fermentation, 8(12), 719.
org/10.3390/agronomy12102546 https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120719
Stuart Chapin III, F., McFarland, J., David McGuire, A., White, P. J., & Brown, P. H. (2010). Plant nutrition for
Euskirchen, E. S., Ruess, R. W., & Kielland, sustainable development and global health.
K. (2009). The changing global carbon cycle: Annals of Botany, 105(7), 1073–1080. https://
Linking plant–soil carbon dynamics to global doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq085
consequences. Journal of Ecology, 97(5),
Xiang, L., Harindintwali, J. D., Wang, F., Redmile-Gordon,
840–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-
M., Chang, S. X., Fu, Y., He, C., Muhoza, B.,
2745.2009.01529.x
Brahushi, F., Bolan, N., Jiang, X., Ok, Y. S.,
Suh, S.-O., Nguyen, N. H., & Blackwell, M. (2008). Yeasts Rinklebe, J., Schaeffer, A., Zhu, Y., Tiedje,
isolated from plant-associated beetles and J. M., & Xing, B. (2022). Integrating biochar,
other insects: Seven novel Candida species bacteria, and plants for sustainable remediation
near Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Research, of soils contaminated with organic pollutants.
8(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567- Environmental Science & Technology, 56(23),
1364.2007.00320.x 16546–16566. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.
est.2c02976
Sumner, M., & Noble, A. (2003). Soil acidification: The
world story. In Z. Rengel (Ed.), Handbook Yamamoto, K., Shiwa, Y., Ishige, T., Sakamoto, H.,
of Soil Acidity. CRC Press. https://doi. Tanaka, K., Uchino, M., Tanaka, N., Oguri, S.,
org/10.1201/9780203912317.ch1 Saitoh, H., & Tsushima, S. (2018). Bacterial
diversity associated with the rhizosphere
Syed, S., Wang, X., Prasad, T. N. V. K. V., & Lian,
and endosphere of two halophytes: Glaux
B. (2021). Bio-organic mineral fertilizer for
210
maritima and salicornia europaea. Frontiers in elevation in acidic terrace paddy soils. Science
Microbiology, 9, 2878. https://doi.org/10.3389/ of The Total Environment, 658, 723–731. https://
fmicb.2018.02878 doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.144
Yan, P., Wu, L., Wang, D., Fu, J., Shen, C., Li, X., Zhang, Zhang, X., Li, B., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., & Tian, S. (2020).
L., Zhang, L., Fan, L., & Wenyan, H. (2020). Soil Antagonistic yeasts: A promising alternative to
acidification in Chinese tea plantations. Science chemical fungicides for controlling postharvest
of The Total Environment, 715, 136963. https:// decay of fruit. Journal of Fungi, 6(3), 158. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136963 doi.org/10.3390/jof6030158
Yazie, T., Mekonnen, M., & Derebe, A. (2021). Gully Zibilske, L. (1998). Handbook of soil conditioners:
erosion and its impacts on soil loss and crop Substances that enhance the physical properties
yield in three decades, northwest Ethiopia. of soil: Soil Science, 163(12), 982–983. https://
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 7(4), doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199812000-00008
2491–2500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-
Zubrzycki, S., Kutzbach, L., & Pfeiffer, E.-M. (2014).
020-01018-y
Permafrost-affected soils and their carbon pools
Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Xing, J., Brookes, P. C., & Xu, J. (2019). with a focus on the Russian Arctic. Solid Earth,
Soil available phosphorus content drives the 5(2), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-595-
spatial distribution of archaeal communities along 2014