The Sales Hiring Hourglass - The Bridge Group
The Sales Hiring Hourglass - The Bridge Group
Hourglass
Recruit better, fill reqs faster, and make
hiring one of your competitive advantages.
bridgegroupinc.com
Consider the traditional B2B marketing and sales funnel. Leads come in the
top, they’re qualified into opportunities, and customers exit the bottom.
Standard stuff.
As of late, thing have shifted. That familiar funnel has morphed into an
hourglass. The rise of the SaaS model and a growing appreciation for
customer success have played a role. As a result, the importance of
retention and expansion has grown. A simplified marketing and sales
hourglass today might look something like this:
Now consider the recruiting pipeline. For many companies, it mirrors the
traditional funnel: applicants, interviews, offers, and hires. But to shrink time-
to-hire, capture more A-players, and cut out unproductive recruiting time, we
must shift to an hourglass mindset. The modern recruiting funnel would flow:
In the rest of this ebook, I’ll be taking each of these turn. Let’s dig in.
ATTRACT
Most leaders have a solid handle on the behaviors and competencies that make
for an ideal candidate. But far too few have spent much time thinking about their
role from the candidate perspective. Have you documented, however informally,
your role elevator pitch?
Approach this as you would creating messaging against a competitor. You don’t
need flowing prose or Madison Avenue ad copy. You do need a few
bullets on why this role matters and why your company makes for an amazing
opportunity.
The role elevator pitch is the basis for your job description, outreach
InMails, and recruiter messaging. It has to pop.
The above example is how the vast majority of job descriptions sound. In a word:
dreary. They are about as captivating and inspiring as the operating manual for my
toaster. Most of us were taught that a job description should, well, describe the
job. But that’s totally backwards.
A job description should sell the job. If you can’t capture attention
and interest, the fine print is irrelevant.
This is sales content. You’ll be selling the sizzle, while every other hiring manager
will be documenting the chemical makeup of the steak. Job descriptions should
leave candidates with just one impression: this is the place to advance my career.
Looking over the 91% that didn’t make the grade, what I found shouldn’t surprise
you. They were buzzwordy, boilerplate, and boring. They did a great job describing
the job and an atrocious job selling it.
In a more recent project, I asked 50 reps to review 15 job descriptions. Their task
was to rate each one as either interesting or not interesting. I then used
statistical analysis to make sense of the data.
NO EFFECT
• Talking up the growth trajectory didn’t seem to matter- You should
certainly highlight this (if true). But almost everyone else is doing it too
and you won’t get a significant bump.
One recruiting channel that is fully stocked and sorely underutilized might surprise
you: Instagram.
It should come as no shock that 90% of those under the age of 30 use social
media. What you may not know is that Instagram has surpassed 400M monthly
active users. That’s four times the numbers of monthly active LinkedIn users.
When it comes to attracting recent college grads (and early career talent),
Instagram is target rich. If you can target them on Facebook, you can target them
on Instagram—that means by city, alma mater, interests, etc.
1. Tight targeting
2. Good creative
3. Clear copy
2. CREATIVE- Think about who you’re targeting. What can you do to catch their
eye? Some employers go the branding route and feature their companies.
While others spotlight members of their team.
Beyond static images, Instagram also allows 60-second video ads. Don’t
worry too much about production quality here. Remember: it’s playing on
a phone, not screening at Sundance. If shooting a video is too daunting,
even a slideshow of still photos of your team around the office (again
bonus points for alumni gear) will work.
3. COPY- On Instagram, fun, hashtags, and memes are all appropriate. But
not at the expense of your copy. You want to be crystal clear with your
call to action. Have a direct link to the job page, not your general careers
site.
Someone wise once said clarity trumps persuasion. Your goal is to drive
click-throughs. Test a few variants of your copy to see which ones deliver
the best results.
You can use the same social advertising principles to recruit on Twitter,
Facebook, and LinkedIn, too. But in terms of spend, effectiveness, and
low competition density, Instagram is a ripe target.
CONVERT
Consider these two landing pages at right. Which do you think does a better
job of converting eyeballs-to-applicants?
Thankfully the marketing profession has landing pages pretty much down to
science. From the folks at Unbounce, we have the five essential elements of
any landing page.
When creating your job landing page, the headline should be the role title. The
benefits can be the responsibilities, requirements, etc. written in the non-sleep-
prescription format we’ve already discussed.
For the hero shot, use pictures of your team, your office (if bright and open), or a
company outing. Consider a video including team members sharing what they
like about the company and the job. Or even the hiring manager sharing what
she’s looking for in a candidate.
For example, Glassdoor shared perspectives from reps, the VP of Sales, and the
GM on working in sales at their company in this video.
Finally, the only call to action should be apply now. No need to clutter this page
up with “follow us on twitter” or “join our talent” newsletter. You want candidates,
not fans. I’m fine with either embedding the application on this page or linking out
to another page with the Apply Now call to action.
In terms of putting this all together, let’s return to the folks at Unbounce and see if
they heed their own advice.
Benefits? Check.
Obvious call-to-action?
Yes! Five for five.
When looking for a new job, candidates are reviewing Glassdoor just like one
would check TripAdvisor or Yelp for restaurant reviews. Bad interview processes,
micromanagers, sub-par compensation—they are all detailed out in the open on
Glassdoor. Great candidates are taking note of what they find there.
Take a look at these two actual reviews. Where would you rather interview?
I’ve reviewed hundreds of company profiles, and there is wide variation in ratings.
Here are examples at both extremes:
Put your best foot forward. Influence candidates’ decisions by highlighting their
peers’ words not your own. The old writing tip show, don’t tell applies here, too.
Improvement takes time, but is worth the effort. Once you’ve done that, highlight
your outstanding reviews. Share your rankings. Link directly to your profile. This is
how you leverage social proof to convert interest. On the next page, you can see
how four companies promote their Glassdoor profiles on their job pages.
If your application has 15+ fields, spreads over multiple pages, or requires a
username and password, it’s time to rethink things. You might object that you’re a
“big company” and you have to do things this way.
Well consider Iron Mountain. They are a Fortune 1000 global company with
annual revenues north of $3B. Here’s how they are taking applications for a sales
position in their Boston office.
Now that you’ve removed extraneous application processing fields, you’ve freed
up room for applicant screening fields.
Below you can see how two companies tackle this. Lever, a SaaS Applicant
Tracking System provider, asks “What sets you apart from your peers?”
Inbound marketing and sales platform, HubSpot, asks “Why do you want to
kickstart your career in sales?”
But if it isn’t actionable in helping you sort and rank candidates, then it doesn’t
belong on your application. Your application process should balance giving the
candidate value (in less application friction) and giving the company value (in
actionable screening information).
QUALIFY
This will increase the speed at which you triage applicants before reading a single
resume. You’ll use these surveys to quickly sort applicants into yes, no, and
maybe buckets. At the risk of being presumptuous, you should put this into
practice tomorrow. It’s cheap, easy, and effective.
In your “thank you for applying” email, prompt them to take a five-minute survey.
You’ll notice three benefits right away.
2. You’ll see if they’re able to do quick and effective internet research. A fair
portion of the sales role is web sleuthing. Why not test them upfront?
If you had only thirty seconds, how would you explain what we do to
someone you met in an airport/coffee shop/etc.?
[Open text]
It will likely take a few passes to fine tune your questions. I’m confident that in the
near term, you will be able to bubble up the best applicants and move them to the
next step with speed. Even if you have external recruiters sourcing candidates,
have them use the survey as part of their process.
We all know that screening applications, resumes, social profiles, etc. is tedious.
Great resume writers can make bad reps or vice versa. A brief survey will allow
you to quickly prioritize the candidates. The faster you can prioritize, the faster
you can reach out, and the further ahead of other companies you’ll be.
Your recruiting process has to be just that, a process, and not random acts of
hiring. Below, is a six step hiring process. Bear in mind, this isn’t a rigid system.
You can add or remove steps to meet the needs of your organization. I promise
not to take it personally.
1. APPLICATION + SURVEY
We covered these concepts in the previous chapters.
If no red flags were uncovered, the recruiter should tell the candidate to expect a
call from the hiring manager the next day. Make sure your talent specialist
provides the hiring manager’s name and title and sends an email to confirm.
3. PHONE INTERVIEW
The third step is a more traditional interview, but briefer and still phone based. It
should take you no longer than twenty minutes and, hopefully, end by scheduling
an in-person interview. When it comes to inside sales hiring, phone interviews are
as (if not more) important than in-person. Your reps will be making their living on
the phones. They need to be articulate and able to make a connection without
being face to face. These are the first two questions you should ask:
4. ON-SITE INTERVIEW
If they’ve made it through the first three gates, it’s time to bring them onsite. On-
site interviews require real time commitments of yourself and your team. It is
much better to disqualify aggressively in steps 1-3 and spare the team from
wasting any time.
During the phone interview, you asked candidates what they know about your
company. Now, take it one level deeper. If you have trials, demos, or webinars
available, ask them if they looked at them and about their impressions. Ask them
what they’ve gleaned about your prospects and your target market.
They don’t have to be flawlessly prepared, but you should feel that they have
made an investment. If they haven’t, it suggests they lack curiosity and interest.
Others have compiled great lists of interview questions. If you’re interested, I
recommend:
Group interviews can mitigate this “serial firing squad” problem. With either one-
on-one or group interviews, a hiring scorecard is required (discussed in the next
chapter).
The candidates who make the most of this opportunity are the ones you want to
hire. They’ll be the ones who are comfortable asking hard questions of a peer
who knows the day to day. Ask your reps to be honest—the good, the bad, and
the ugly. Don’t have them sugar coat anything, as it will come back to bite you.
Run the process consistently. It’s tempting to rush and bring people onsite. Phone
interview everyone, without exception. You want to minimize time wasted in
extensive onsite interviews with unqualified candidates. This will free up your
team to dive deeper with the best candidates.
Let’s say you and two of your reps interview a candidate. How do you compare
notes?
But why did you, Marissa, and Mark like the candidate? Was it even for the same
reasons? How do you stack rank your “likes” across multiple candidates? A better
way to evaluate candidates is with a scorecard. A scorecard ensures the entire
team is on the same page when it comes to the characteristics, behaviors, and
competencies you’re trying to assess.
This is hard, but important. What are the strengths you’re looking for? Can
interviewers be expected to uncover and assess them? Can their impressions be
quantified? A scorecard is about standardizing the impressions a candidate makes
on the interviewing team.
The quote above underscores the importance of figuring out which specific strengths
you require and building a scoring model to help you find candidates who excel in
those areas.
I’ve tried asking for just “YES” or “NO” ratings. But interviewers felt too restricted.
I’ve experimented with rating on a scale of 1-10, but no one could explain how a seven
differed from an eight. Eventually, I settled on a scale rating of 1-4, but found that most
everyone only gave out twos and threes.
Then I stumbled on applicant tracking system company Lever and found a better way.
Say your scorecard is rating candidates as “strong hires” who, later, end up
underperforming. It might be time to revisit your criteria and confirm that the skills
you’re grading on are the skills that matter for doing the job. (From our experience,
cultural fit is one of those criteria that is equally likely to produce bad and good
hires.)
For example, one company used participation in collegiate team sports. As you’d
expect, the majority of their hires played a college sport. But when they examined
performance at the six-month mark, those who played collegiate team sports were
just as likely to be C-players as A-players. And when they looked at their top reps,
more were non-athletes than athletes. Without keeping score, “what we know but
just isn’t so” can rule the day.
If your peer interviewers have a track record of scoring candidates highly (who turn out
to be great hires), keep them interviewing. If you have an interviewer who consistently
rates reps highly (who turn out to be bad hires) excuse them from future interviews.
You can build a simple spreadsheet to figure out who is overly harsh, who is wildly
inconsistent, and who is remarkably accurate in making hiring recommendations.
Tracking makes and misses requires being ruthless on both your hiring criteria and
who makes up the interviewing team. It is much harder to do either of those without
keeping score.
CLOSE
Take a look at some of the most highly rated employers on Glassdoor, and you’ll
notice a common thread: their interview processes are lean. Many run, from soup
to nuts, in just two weeks. If you want A-players to choose you, you need to move
quickly. Here’s my (admittedly aggressive) timeline:
STAGE DAY
Receive Resume + Send and Review Survey 1-2
Phone Screen 3
Phone Interview 4
On-Site, Peer Interviews, Shadow/Mock Call 6–12
Extend Offer 14
I prefer the offer to come from either the CEO or the VP of Sales—as high as you
can go. This is a final opportunity to make the candidate feel special. Just like with
job descriptions, add some personality and sizzle to the offer letter. It is a sales
tool, and until the candidate signs on the dotted line, you are still in selling mode.
On the next page, I’ve shared four reviews taken off of Glassdoor. Notice two
things. One, initial contact to offer accepted was fast. Two, the hiring process was
structured and run like a sales process. That’s what you’re looking for.
Most startup companies I’ve ever worked with make one crucial
mistake: They assume that their recruitment process is over
when that person accepts his or her offer. The truth is the
process isn’t over until after the employee starts with the
company, updates her LinkedIn profile and emails all her friends.
In fact, it’s worse than that. The moment your future head of
sales, marketing, product or even junior developer says “yes” is
the moment you’re most vulnerable of losing them.
- Mark Suster on his blog Both Sides of the Table
Assuming two weeks’ notice and a six-day buffer, that means we have on average
20 days from offer acceptance to start. Stay in touch over that period.
• 12 days before start- Ship them some logo’d company gear (e.g.,
stickers, water bottle, hoodie, etc.)
• 7 days before start- Mail them a printed, detailed orientation agenda. The
what, who, and when of it. You don’t want them harboring any second
thoughts one week out.
• 3 days before start- have the hiring managers’ manager send a “looking
forward to meeting you” email. Tell them the team has been working all
week prepping their workspace. Maybe even send along a picture of their
desk with a small welcome gift on it.
This isn’t about social pressure, excessive flattery, or manipulation. It’s about
confirming for the candidate that they’ve made the right decision. To have a
candidate accept an offer and then rescind is an enormous waste of energy, time,
and money. Do everything you can to prevent fumbling on the goal line.
For most companies, sales “recycles” the account back to marketing. That is the
exact approach you should take with candidates who voluntarily drop out of your
recruiting funnel. Perhaps they decided to remain at their current employer. Or
maybe they (foolishly!) took another offer.
Fine.
Some managers act like jilted lovers and harbor ill will towards the candidate.
That’s a mistake. A great candidate who says “yes” and a great candidate who
says “no thanks” have one thing in common: they’re both great. These missed
connections aren’t locked up for 36 month terms with a competitor. You need to
keep them in your funnel. Perhaps 5, 4, or even 2 months down the line they’ll see
the error of their ways.
If a candidate took another offer and find they regret it, most won’t come crawling
back. But if you’ve stayed in touch and (refrained from salting the earth), you can
pick right back up where your hiring process left off.
ADVOCATE
Did you pay for your wedding cake on your one-year anniversary?
Did you put the down payment on your car after your first oil change?
Ridiculous, right? Yet companies often pay months after the fact for candidate
referrals. That length of time doesn’t incent immediate action and leads to little or
no referral effort. Even if the bonus is high ($1K+ per), long odds encourage little
effort. Here’s a better idea: pay on valid applications submitted.
Perhaps group thank you events or branded swag are more appropriate for your
team. Fine by me. Salesforce shared how they give recognition for participation,
not just for hires.
Mark Roberge has lived the hiring reality. From 2007 to 2013, Mark served as
HubSpot’s SVP of worldwide sales and services. During that time, he expanded
the sales group from a handful of reps to more than 450 people. Mark shared:
I call this the forced referral. It was by far the best technique we
used to find talent. It is tougher to do when you have only one
or two salespeople on staff and you are not growing quickly. Once
you start scaling, it works beautifully.
When a new rep has been in the role for roughly three months, I
tell them that tomorrow we are going to sit together for twenty
minutes. And that tonight, I’m going to go through all their LinkedIn
connections and find people that are early on in their careers at good
companies. I’ll build a list that we’re going to go through together.
At the meeting, Mark would show up with a list of names to review with his reps.
He shared that, upon seeing the list of names, his reps would exclaim, “Why
didn’t I think of these people?”
Prompting referrals—I prefer that over calling them forced—may just become your
best source of candidates.
When a great rep leaves it stings. For most companies, the relationship ends with
the exit interview. For extremely gifted managers, the departure is on good terms.
But one company actively publicizes when reps move on: memoryBlue.
The flip side of that coin is the Alumni network. This network connects former
employees to memoryBlue and boosts recruiting efforts.
A real bottleneck is getting the right people. Our Alumni, because of the way
we fast-tracked their careers, refer younger siblings, roommates, and friends.
A very high percentage of our hires are referrals.
Our alumni continue to serve as advocates for the company and the
program. They are an ongoing recruitment marketing resource. When we're
interviewing people, I like to tell them, ‘I challenge you to go find another
hiring manager who's going to truly care what you're doing three, four, five
jobs from now. I will because you'll continue be an ambassador for the
program.
They are essentially awarding a SPIF to a rep who doesn’t work for
them any longer. What they are doing is playing the long game and
cementing a career-length connection to the company. You needn’t
adopt the memoryBlue program in its entirety. But I hope you can find
one or two pieces to put into practice at your company.
Those are the exact skills you’ll need to master to make hiring a
competitive advantage. Do so and you’ll build a world-class (and
operationally ruthless) recruiting engine.