New Polyvinyl Alcohol/gellan Gum Based Bioplastics With Guava and Chickpea Extracts For Food Packaging
New Polyvinyl Alcohol/gellan Gum Based Bioplastics With Guava and Chickpea Extracts For Food Packaging
com/scientificreports
Plastics are petroleum based organic polymers that possess extraordinarily rapid growth and large-scale produc-
tion due to their lightweight, chemical stability and low processing c ost1–3. This massive production is derived
by the global shift from reusable to single use containers. On the other hand, the huge plastic production gen-
erated a global solid waste accumulation that is growing steadily over the years4. There are two basic classes of
plastics, thermoplastics and thermosets. For both classes of plastics, most of the monomers used to produce
them are derived from fossil hydrocarbons such as ethylene, propylene, and styrene. Therefore, plastics are non-
biodegradable i.e., they don’t decompose naturally. Consequently, plastic accumulates in the earth and oceans
causing serious environmental and health p roblems1–5 .
In contrast to plastics, bioplastics includes polymers that are biodegradable and/or originate from renew-
able resources2,6. They can be classified into four classes, Class (I) which includes the polysaccharides that are
directly extracted from biomass such as starch7,8, xanthan gum9, guar gum10, gellan gum and proteins. Class (II)
of bioplastics includes materials that are bio-sourced but not biodegradable such as polyethylene produced from
ethanol by fermentation2. Class (III) of bioplastics includes materials that are produced from petrochemicals but
are degradable. An example of such materials is polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, the structure is illustrated in Fig. 1a).
Class (IV) are polymers that are produced by the action of bacteria such as polyhydroxyalkanoate2.
Bioplastics made from blends of two or more types of the above-mentioned polymers have been a target of
many research groups aiming to have enhanced/desired mechanical properties and/or lower c ost2,11,12.
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, Fig. 1a)1, which belongs to class (III) in bioplastics classification2, is a water-soluble
synthetic biodegradable polymer. It is widely used as thermoplastic polymer and is usually prepared by hydroly-
sis of polyvinyl acetate. PVA is nontoxic and has many applications in industry, medicine, and food sector,
1
Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Naser City, Cairo 11727, Egypt. 2Faculty of Biotechnology, October
University for Modern Sciences and Arts, 6th of October City, Egypt. 3Faculty of Petroleum and Mining
Engineering, Suez University, P.O.Box: 43221, Suez, Egypt. *email: [email protected]; walaa.omar@
pme.suezuni.edu.eg
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 1. (a) The chemical structure of PVA1, (b) GG20,21, and (c) Glycerol.
specifically food p ackaging13. Physical mixing of synthetic polymers such as PVA with natural polymers repre-
sents an effective way to obtain polymeric materials with desired features, improved mechanical characteristics
and biological performances14. For that purpose, PVA was blended successfully with many natural polymers and
the produced copolymers are successfully employed in many fields. In medicine, PVA blends were promising
candidates in tissue engineering. PVA/chitosan blend has been employed in neural tissues therapies15. While
PVA/PET (polyethylene terephthalate) blend has been applied in vascular grafts, PVA/collagen has been used
in corneal applications. PVA/Gellan gum (GG) biodegradable nanofibers have been prepared for skin tissue
regeneration11,12.
In the same context, films formed from such PVA blends showed enhanced mechanical properties for indus-
trial applications16. The films mechanical properties could be tuned by the PVA percentage in the blend. PVA
blends with natural polymers such as guar g um17, starch1,18, cellulose19 and chitosan20 have been reported in
food packaging applications. PVA is soluble in water due to the presence of the hydroxyl groups in its backbone
(Fig. 1a)1. The PVA hydrophilicity enables the use of water as a solvent during blending PVA with other polymers.
The water temperature should be around 100 °C to have the PVA completely soluble and ready to be mixed with
other dissolved polymers forming a homogenous solution16.
Brunchi et al.14 studied the interaction in the blend PVA /xanthan gum. FTIR analysis proved the formation
of a network of hydrogen bonds between the carboxylate and hydroxyl groups in xanthan gum and the hydroxyl
groups of PVA.
Gellan gum (GG) is a biocompatible thermally stable polysaccharide (Fig. 1b). It is a hydrophilic biopolymer
that is widely recognized as a food a dditive21,22. However, it has poor mechanical strength, high gelling tempera-
ture and small temperature window. Therefore, GG was blended with different natural and synthetic polymers
to have a blend with tunable mechanical and physical p roperties11,12.
23
Paolicelli et al. have prepared thin films of plasticized GG by solvent casting technique for oral delivery appli-
cations. They reported that the use of glycerol (Fig. 1c) as a plasticizer by an amount of 20–75% w/w enhanced
the mechanical characteristics of GG based films as it reduced the interconnection among the polymeric chains.
In general, glycerol is a biodegradable, non-toxic trihydroxy compound that is widely used as a p lasticizer24,25.
12
PVA\GG composites have been the target of a few studies. Vashisth et al. prepared electro-spun PVA\Gel-
lan nanofibers. The composite has been employed in biomedical engineering after stabilization by cross-linking
under different conditions.
Sudhamani et al.26 reported PVA/GG blended films by solution casting method. They used water as solvent
and glycerol as a plasticizer. The thermal characteristics, intermolecular interactions and mechanical properties
have been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transfer spectroscopy (FTIR) and tensile
tests, respectively. Although the mechanical properties suggested that films from that blend are potential candi-
dates for food packaging, no extended real performance or hydro-stability tests were provided.
Bioplastic with extra features and properties that suit the packaging purpose would be highly desirable.
Research groups have incorporated plants extract to add value to bioplastics. Tran et al.27 added oregano waste
extract to propylene carbonate/cellulose acetate bioplastic to obtain high UV protection and antioxidant food
packaging. Jung et al.28 mixed a naturally produced indigo pigment with polyhydroxyalkanoate to produce blue
colored bioplastic. Pea protein-based bioplastics have also been produced. This type of bioplastics possessed
enhanced mechanical and antimicrobial p roperties29.
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Among the plants, Psidium guajava (Guava) leaves extract, which is denoted as GL in this paper, has several
biological activities. It has antifungal, antimicrobial, anti-cancer, antioxidant, and antitumor properties30–32.
Moreover, the bioactive compounds extracted from guava leaf have been used in the preparation of jelly referred
as guava leaf extract jelly. Adequate intake of these jellies helped the consumer lower high cholesterol levels in
the body and boost up i mmunity33. Guava leaves extract have been recently added to sodium alginate to develop
antimicrobial food p ackaging34.
Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum), CP, have got several applications in food, cosmetics, and packaging35, in addition
to their applications in medicine such as the treatment of ulcer, bronchitis, cholera, constipation, and cancer36,37.
Chickpea aquafaba has also been recently employed in bioplastic p ackaging35. Additionally, the Proteins isolated
from the Chickpea seeds were good candidates for thermoplastic biopolymeric m aterials38.
Bioplastic for food packaging might be ingested by human and animals. Additionally, most food packages are
designed for single use and very probably will be disposed to the environment. Therefore, materials to be used
for food packaging applications should be safe to consumers and the e nvironment39–41.
In this paper, PVA\GG composites have been prepared with three different compositions (50/50, 30/70,
and 70/30) which are denoted in this research as S1, S2 and S3, respectively. Films from the blends have been
prepared by solvent casting technique. The bioplastic films were characterized by FTIR, and the mechanical
properties were investigated by tensile tests. Plant extracts, namely, Guajava leaves (GL), and chickpeas (CP)
extracts have been prepared and characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The extracts were
incorporated individually to the most promising composition of the PVA/GG blends (S2 composition). Films
of PVA/GG and the plant extracts (S2/GL and S2/CP) have been investigated for their food packaging proper-
ties and utilization. To test the real performance of the prepared films as food packaging material, accelerated
weather testing and water wettability tests have been carried out. The bioplastic films have also been tested for
their cytotoxicity, oxygen, and water permeability. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and C O2 emissions of the newly
prepared bioplastics have been studied.
Methodology
Chemicals and plant materials
Chemicals
PVA and GG were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Glycerol was purchased from the united company for
chemicals, Cairo.
Plant materials
The plant materials collection and use in this research comply with the national and international guidelines and
legislation. GL were collected from national Guajava trees in Menofia. Chickpeas were commercial grade and
were purchased from national food store.
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Mechanical measurements
Tensile tests were performed by the ASTM D412 test strategy and were done at room temperature using a tensile
tester (Tinius Olsen-H10K). The crosshead speed was (10 mm/min). The initial gauge length of the specimen
was (80 mm) and the width of each sample was (2 mm). Thickness 0.130–0.150 mm.
Oxygen permeability
The oxygen permeabilities of samples S2, S2/GL and S2/CP were measured by the method described by Shi et al.44
The oxygen permeability of the samples under investigation has been calculated using Eq. (2)44.
(2)
OP oxygen permeability = Mf − Mi /(t x A)
where Mf is the final weight of the weighing bottle after equilibrated in the desiccator for 24 h at 90% humidity
and 25 °C, Mi is the initial weight of the weighing bottle and t is the equilibrated time (48 h) in seconds, and A
is the surface area of the exposed films.
Life cycle assessment and carbon footprint for the prepared bioplastic
Life cycle assessment has been investigated using the model proposed by Benavides et al.45. The data for CO2
emissions for the different components in the bioplastic have been collected from different resources. The refer-
ences are provided in the references section for each value considered.
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 2. The step wise preparation of GG/PVA bioplastic by solvent casting techniques.
Figure 3. The FTIR for pure GG (green line), Pure PVA (red line) and PVA/GG blend (blue line).
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
corresponds to the –C=O stretching. The peak at 1450 cm-1 represents –CH bending while at 1100 cm-1 is due
to the -CO stretching of the –COH group48–50. After blending GG and PVA, a shift in the peak positions was
observed. The peak assigned to the -OH was broader and shifted to a lower wavelength (3298 cm-1) than in the
pure PVA and GG. This shift can be attributed to an increase in the intermolecular hydrogen bonding resulted
from the blending. The peak at 1726 cm-1 in PVA was also shifted to be at 1716 cm-1 which indicates an increase
in the hydrogen bonding. The peak at 1031 cm-1 in GG appeared at 1037 cm-1 in the mixture which indicates
successful blending23,49.
attributed to the -CH stretching of aliphatic hydrocarbons. At 1638 cm-1 is the –C=O stretching of the carbonyl
compounds. A band at 1070 cm-1 corresponds to the –CO of the flavonoids. The broad band at 610 cm-1 cor-
responds to the heterocyclic compounds in GL e xtract31,53.
In GL water extract, the –OH and .C=O functionalized compounds are predominant. The chemical structure
of the most abundant group present in GL extracts compounds is illustrated in Fig. 4c33,55. The GL extract has
been blended with PVA/GG (30/70) mixture in 5 wt%. The mechanical properties, water and oxygen perme-
abilities, water wettability and life cycle of the PVA/GG/GL (S2/GL) bioplastic have been investigated in fol-
lowing sections.
Figure 4. (a) the FTIR of GL extract, (b) FTIR of CP extract, (c) the galloyl group present in GL extract active
compounds50, and (d) an example of the hydroxy compounds presents in CP extract (genistein)61.
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
In this paper, we targeted the phenolic and other hydroxy functionalized components in the plants extracts as
the -OH functionalized compounds are predicted to act as plasticizers-like materials. Therefore, an aqueous
ethanolic solution (50/50) has been used in the extraction of the active components in grounded chickpeas. The
FTIR chart for CP aqueous ethanolic extract has been shown in Fig. 4b. The broad peak at 3298 cm-1 corresponds
to the –OH and –NH stretching vibrations. The peak at 2933 cm-1 refers to the –CH and –CH2 stretching vibra-
tion. The peaks at 1650 and 1565 cm-1 are attributed to the amide groups (–CONH) of proteins. The sharp band
at 1034 cm-1 is referred to the –CH bending of the glycosidic bond29,58–60.
The chemical structure of an example of the active compounds present in GL extracts is illustrated in Fig. 4d61.
The CP extract has been blended with the PVA/GG mixture in 5 wt% and the blend is denoted as S2/CP in this
paper. The mechanical properties, water wettability, cytotoxicity, water and oxygen permeability and life cycle
of the S2/CP bioplastic have been investigated in following sections.
Mechanical properties
The mechanical properties of the prepared bioplastic have been investigated by measuring the tensile strength
for the films S1, S2 and S3 (Table 2) prepared by solvent casting technique. The tensile strength measurements
for S1, S2 and S3 have been shown in Fig. 5a–c, respectively. Figure 5d shows the tensile strength for S2, S2/CP
and S2/GL.
Table 2. The tensile strength and elongation values of the prepared bioplastic films.
Figure 5. The tensile strength measurement for (a) sample S1, (b) sample S2, (c) sample S3 and (d) S2, S2/CP
and S2/GL.
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
From Table 2, S2 had a suitable tensile strength/strain values for a bioplastic material. The sample has the
least amount of PVA with a fossil origin, therefore, S2 blend was selected along with S2/plant extracts for further
studies. Tensile strength measurements for S2 after addition of the GL and CP extracts have been carried out
to investigate the enhancement in the bioplastic mechanical properties by the addition of plant extracts. It has
been reported that the addition of PVA to the GG enhanced the GG mechanical properties16. After the addition
of the GL and CP extracts, the mechanical properties of the bioplastic have been enhanced even further, Fig. 5d.
This enhancement can be attributed to the -OH functionalized components in the plant extracts which can act
as natural plasticizers. Additionally, the extract components with OH and NH groups can form hydrogen bonds
or physical crosslinking with the GG resulting in an improved mechanical property. Similar effects have been
observed by other research groups27,29,62. The more enhancement in the mechanical properties by addition of
GL extract than the CP extract can be attributed to the presence of small molecule phenolic compounds in GL
extract.
Cytotoxicity studies
Cytotoxicity of the film S2 against the Vero normal cell line was assayed. Results showed that the cell viability of
ackaging63–65.
Vero cells was 99.67% (Fig. 7 and Table 3), which is considered very safe for S2 to be used in food p
Figure 6. The water contact angle of the bioplastic films: (a) S2, (b) S2 with GL and (c) S2 with CP.
Figure 7. (a) Control Vero cells and (b) Effect of PVA/GG (S2) on cell viability of Vero normal cell line at
concentration 1000 uL and incubation time 24 h.
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Table 3. Viability and toxicity of S2 on Vero cell line. *Viability has been calculated using the formula
reported in42.
Table 4. WVTR values (g/m2/d) and oxygen permeability values (g/m2/s) for samples S2, S2/GL and S2/CP.
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 9. Accelerated weathering test, (a) PVA/GG (S2), (b) S2 with GL extract and (c) S2 with CP extract.
Life cycle assessment and carbon footprint for the prepared bioplastic
Bioplastic is an environmentally friendly solution for the problematic accumulation of fossil-based plastics. The
biodegradability of bioplastic is considered an effective solution for plastic waste management. But at the same
time, biodegradability led to GHG emissions. Therefore, life cycle assessment (LCA) has become a prerequisite
to understand the environmental impact for any newly prepared bioplastics. A proposed LCA for the newly
prepared PVA/GG based bioplastic is illustrated in Fig. 1045,75. The LCA considered a comparison of a fossil
derived plastic, namely LDPE in addition to the newly prepared PVA/GG bioplastics45. The PVA/GG based
bioplastic composed of 30% PVA and 70% GG, therefore all the assessments and calculations consider the active
percentage of each component. The system boundaries in Fig. 10 covered all the materials (chemicals, water,
enzymes, etc.) and energy inputs for all stages including the conversion and production process of plastic and
possible end of life scenarios. The end-of-life proposed scenarios are landfilling for the LDPE and composting
for PVA/GG bioplastic.
To calculate C O2 emissions of the bioplastic, detailed GHG for each step and components have been con-
sidered and calculated. The GHG values for the bioplastic components and LDPE have been listed in Table 5.
The life cycle GHG emissions of LDPE and the PVA/GG based bioplastic have been illustrated in Fig. 11.
The carbon uptake for GG has been calculated based on the carbon content in its structure (based on its
molecular formula) while fossil-based LDPE, HDPE and PVA have no carbon uptake. The net GHG of the bio-
plastic is then equal to the GHG emissions minus the atmospheric CO2 taken or absorbed during the biomass
cultivation45.
The value of plastic processing and production CO2 emission is equal for all plastic and bioplastic as reported
by Benavides et al.45 after conversion of energy input to C
O2 emission77. The biodegradation of PVA is associated
with the emission of 2 kg C O2e/Kg PVA78. To the best of our knowledge, no exact values for the CO2 emissions
associated with GG degradation. Consequently, excluding the biodegradation value of GG, the total C O2 emis-
sions for the PVA/GG (30/70) bioplastic is equal to 7.14 K gCO2e/KG. This value is expected to decrease after
the addition of the plant extracts as guava and chickpeas trees are reported to have a potential in increasing
carbon sequestration51.
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 10. A proposed LCA for the prepared PVA/GG based bioplastic.
Table 5. GHG emissions values for the plastic and bioplastic components.
Figure 11. The GHG emissions of PVA/GG based bioplastic in comparison with LDPE and HDPE.
Conclusion
In this work, three compositions of PVA/GG blends have been successfully prepared. The composition with
30/70 percent of PVA/GG showed promising mechanical properties as a bioplastic for food packaging applica-
tions. The addition of GL and CP extracts enhanced the mechanical properties even further due to the presence
of hydroxy functionalized compounds that can act as natural plasticizers. Scanning electron microscopy studies
for the surface of the sample S2 showed normal surface for plastics with few voids that might be attributed to
the degree of the dispersion of the plasticizer. Cytotoxicity assay for the new PVA/GG (S2, 30/70) showed that
the newly prepared bioplastic is very safe to be used for food packaging. In general, the WVTR test for the S2,
S/GL and S2/CP showed values that are comparable to previously reported values for other bioplastics martials
for food packaging applications. Oxygen permeability test showed that the addition of plant extracts leads to
an increase in the oxygen permeability for samples S2/GL and S2/CP compared to S2 (with PVA and GG only)
which might indicate that the compounds present in the added plant extract disturbed the hydrogen bonding
between the polymers leading to more gas permeation. The GL and CP bioactive phenolic compounds in their
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
extracts increased the wettability and facilitated the degradation process under the optimum environmental
conditions. LCA has been carried out to facilitate carbon footprint calculations. The LCA and carbon footprint
calculations revealed that the use biopolymers derived from potential carbon sequestering biomass can largely
balance the carbon emissions from bioplastics. Consequently, bioplastic can be a safe solution for fossil based
plastic accumulation.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
References
1. Jayasekara, R., Harding, I., Bowater, I. & Lonergan, G. Biodegradability of a selected range of polymers and polymer blends and
standard methods for assessment of biodegradation. J. Polym. Environ. 13, 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-005-4758-2
(2005).
2. Song, J., Kay, M., Coles, R. Food and beverage packaging technology, 2nd ed. Chapter 11, Bioplastics, 295–319 (Blackwell Publish-
ing, 2011).
3. Harzol, M. D., Sapuan, S. M., Zainudin, E. S., Zuhri, M. Y. M. & Abdul Wahab, N. I. Corn starch (Zea mays) biopolymer plastic
reaction in combination with sorbitol and glycerol. Polymers 13, 242–264. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020242 (2021).
4. Tarique, J., Sapuan, M. & Khalina, A. Effect of glycerol plastisizer loading on the physical, mechanical, thermal and barrier prop-
erties of arrowroot (maranta arundinacea) starch biopolymers. Sci. Rep. 11, 13900–13916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-
93094-y (2021).
5. Birca, A., Gherasim, O., Grumezescu, V. & Grumezescu, A. M. Materials for Biomedical Engineering: Introduction in Thermoplastic
and Thermosetting Polymers 1st edn, 1–28 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816874-5.00001-3.
6. Jariyasakoolroj, P., Leelaphiwat, P. & Harnkarnsujarit, N. Advances in research and development of bioplastic for food packaging.
J. Sci. Food Agric. 100(14), 5032–5045. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9497 (2020).
7. Abdel-Raouf, M. S. & Abdul-Raheim, A. R. M. Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater by biomass-based materials:
A review. J. Pollut. Eff. Cont. 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4397.1000180 (2017).
8. Hasanin, M. S., El Saied, H., Morsy, F. A. & Rokbaa, H. H. A. Green nanocoating-based polysaccharides decorated with ZnONPs
doped Egyptian kaolinite for antimicrobial coating paper. Sci. Rep. 13, 11461. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38467-1 (2023).
9. Azmi, G. E. et al. Adsorption of xanthan gum polymer and sodium dodecylbenzenesulphonate surfactant in sandstone reservoirs:
Experimental and density function theory studies. ACS Omega 7(42), 37237–37247. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03488
(2022).
10. Elsaeed, S. M., Zaki, E. G., Omar, W. A. E., Ashraf Soliman, A. A. & Attia, A. M. Guar gum-based hydrogels as potent green poly-
mers for enhanced oil recovery in high-salinity reservoirs. ACS Omega 6, 23421–23431. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c033
52 (2021).
11. Zia, K. M. et al. Recent trends on gellan gum blends with natural and synthetic polymers: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 109,
1068–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.099 (2018).
12. Vashisth, P. & Pruthi, V. Synthesis and characterization of crosslinked gellan\PVA nanofibers for tissue engineering applications.
Mater. Sci. Eng. C 67, 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.049 (2016).
13. Suganthi, S., Vignesh, S., Sundar, J. K. & Raj, V. Fabrication of PVA polymer films with improved antibacterial activity by fine-
tuning via organic acids for food packaging applications. Appl. Water Sci. 10(100), 1–11. https://d oi.o
rg/1 0.1 007/s 13201-0 20-1 162-y
(2020).
14. Brunchi, C.-E., Bercea, M., Morariu, S. & Avadanei, M. Investigations on the interactions between xanthan gum and poly(vinyl
alcohol) in solid state and aqueous solutions. Eur. Polym. J. 84, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.09.006 (2016).
15. Teixeira, M. A., Amorim, M. T. P. & Felgueiras, H. P. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-based nanofibrous electrospun scaffolds for tissue engi-
neering applications. Polymers 12, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12010007 (2020).
16. Gaaz, T. S. et al. Properties and applications of polyvinyl alcohol, halloysite nanotubes and their nanocomposites. Molecules 20,
22833–22847. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201219884 (2015).
17. Tiwari, A., Terada, D., Kobayash, H. Polyvinyl modified guar-gum bioplastics for packaging applications. in Handbook of Bioplastics
and Biocomposites Engineering Applications 177–188 (Scrivener Publishing LLC, 2011).
18. Hashem, A. et al. Bio-based antimicrobial food packaging films based on hydroxypropyl starch/polyvinyl alcohol loaded with the
biosynthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Micromol. 240, 126011. https://d oi.o
rg/1 0.1 016/j.i jbiom ac.2 023.1 26011 (2023).
19. Naik, M. L. et al. Nanobacterial cellulose production and its antibacterial activity in biodegradable poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes
for food packaging applications. ACS OMEGA https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04336 (2022).
20. Rahman, H. et al. Recent advancement of PVA/chitosan-based composite biofilm for food packaging. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res.
46(1), 36982–36986. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2022.46.007286 (2022).
21. Imeson, A. Thickening and gelling agents for food 227–248 (Springer, 1997).
22. Gong, Y. et al. An improved injectable polysaccharide hydrogel: Modified gellan gum for long-term cartilage regeneration in vitro.
J. Mater. Chem. 19(14), 1968–1977. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03352 (2009).
23. Paolicelli, P. et al. Effect of glycerol on the physical and mechanical properties of thin gellan gum films for oral drug delivery. Int.
J. Pharm. 547, 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.05.046 (2018).
24. Safaei, H. R., Shekouhy, M., Rahmanpur, S. & Shirinfeshan, A. Glycerol as a biodegradable and reusable promoting medium for
the catalyst-free one-pot three component synthesis of 4H-pyrans. Green Chem. 14, 1696–1704. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2gc3
5135h (2012).
25. Epure, V., Griffon, M., Pollet, E. & Averous, L. Structure and properties of glycerol-plasticized chitosan obtained by mechanical
kneading. Carbohydr. Polym. 83, 947–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.09.003 (2011).
26. Sudhamani, S. R., Prasad, M. S. & Sankar, K. U. DSC and FTIR studies on gellan and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) blend Films. Food
Hydrocoll. 17, 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(02)00057-7 (2003).
27. Tran, T. N., Mai, B. T., Setti, C. & Athanassiou, A. Transparent bioplastic derived from CO2-based polymer functionalized with
oregano waste extract toward active food packaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 12, 46667–46677. https://d oi.o
rg/1 0.1 021/a csami.
0c12789 (2020).
28. Jung, H.-R. et al. Production pf blue-colored polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) by one-pot production and coextraction of indigo and
phb from recombinant escherichia coli. Dyes Pigments. 173, 107889–107893. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 016/j.d yepig.2 019.1 07889 (2020).
29. Puyana-Perez, V., Guartero, P., Rosado-Jimenez, M., Martinez, I. & Romero, A. Physical crosslinking of pea protein-based bio-
plastics: Effect of heat and UV treatment. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 32, 100836–100844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100836
(2022).
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
30. Bezerra, G. F. et al. Analysis by UPLC-MS-QTOF and antifungal activity of guava (Psidium Guajava L.). Food Chem. Toxol. 119,
122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.05.021 (2018).
31. Shaheena, S., Chintaguna, A. D., Dirisala, V. R. & Kumar, N. S. S. Extraction of bioactive compounds from psidium guajava and
their application in dentistry. AMP Expr. 9, 208–216 (2019).
32. Naseer, S., Hussain, S., Naeem, N., Pervaiz, M. & Rahman, M. The Photochemistry and medicinal value of psidium guajava (guava).
Clin. Phytosci. 4, 32–39 (2018).
33. Kumar, N. S. S. et al. Extraction of bioactive compounds from psidium guajava leaves and its utilization in preparation of jellies.
AMP Expr. 11, 36–44 (2021).
34. Luo, Y., Liu, H., Yang, S., Zeng, J. & Wu, Z. Sodium alginate-based green packaging films functionalized by guava leaf extracts and
their bioactivities. Materials 12, 2923–2937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12182923 (2019).
35. Tassoni, A. et al. State-of-the art production chains for peas, beans, and chickpeas- valorization of agro-industrial residues and
applications of derived extracts. Molecules 25, 1383–1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25061383 (2020).
36. Jayaprakash, B. & Das, A. Extraction and characterization of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) extract with immunostimulant acitivity
in BALB/C mice. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 19(3), 803–810 (2018).
37. Faridy, J.-C.M., Stephanie, C.-G.M., Gabriels, M.-M.O. & Cristian, J.-M. Biological activities of chickpea in human health (Cicer
arietinum L.) A review. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 75, 142–153 (2020).
38. Ricci, L. et al. On the thermal behaviour of protein isolated from different legumes investigated by DSC and TGA. J. Sci. Food
Agric. 98, 5368–5377 (2018).
39. Hasanin, M. S. & Youssef, A. M. Ecofriendly bioactive film doped CuO nanoparticles-based biopolymers and reinforced by enzy-
matically modified nanocellulose fibers for active packaging applications. Food Packag Shelf Life 34, 100979. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.fpsl.2022.100979 (2022).
40. Hasanin, M., Abdel Kader, A. H., Abd El-Sayed, E. S. & Kamel, S. Green chitosan-flaxseed gum film loaded with ZnO for packaging
applications. Starch 75, 2200132. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.202200132 (2023).
41. Joseph, T. M. et al. Macromolecules: Contemporary futurist thoughts on progressive journey. Eng 4(1), 678–702. https://doi.org/
10.3390/eng4010041 (2023).
42. Hesham, A. H. et al. Unveiling anticancer, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities of novel synthesized bimetallic boron oxide–zinc
oxide nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 13, 20856–20867. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA03413E (2023).
43. Song, Z., Xiao, H. & Zhao, Y. Hydrophobic-modified nano-cellulose fiber/PLA biodegradable composites for lowering water vapor
transmission rate (WVTR) of paper. Carbohydr. Polym. 111, 442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.049 (2014).
44. Zhang, P., Zhao, Y. & Shi, Q. Characterizationof novel edible film based on gum ghatti: Effect of plasticizer type and concentration.
Carbohydr. Polym. 153, 345–355 (2016).
45. Benavides, P. T., Lee, U. & Zare-Mehrjerdi, O. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy use of polylactic acid, bio-derived
polyethylene, and fossil-derived polyethylene. J. Clean. Prod. 277, 124010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124010 (2020).
46. Halim, N. F. A., Majid, S. R., Arof, A. K., Kajzar, F. & Pawlicka, A. Gellan gum-lii gel polymer electrolytes. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.
554, 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2012.634344 (2012).
47. Zhang, N. et al. Effect of gellan gum and xanthan gum synergistic interaction and plasticizers on physical properties of plant based
enteric polymer films. Polymers 12, 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12010121 (2020).
48. Lin, S.-Y., Cheng, W.-T., Wei, Y.-S. & Lin, H.-L. DSC-FTIR microspectroscopy used to investigate the heat-induced intramolecular
cyclic anhydride formation between Eudragit E and PVA copolymer. Polym. J. 43, 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2011.15
(2011).
49. Mansur, H. S., Sadahira, C. M., Souza, A. N. & Mansur, A. A. P. FTIR spectroscopy characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel
with different hydrolysis degree and chemically crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 28(4), 539–548. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.msec.2007.10.088 (2008).
50. Jamnongkan, T., Wattanakornsiri, A., Pansila, P. P., Migliaresi, C. & Kaewpiron, S. Effect of poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan ratio on
electrospun-nanofiber morphologies. Adv. Mater. Res. 463–464, 734–738. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.463-
464.734 (2012).
51. Naik, S. K., Sarker, P. K., Das, B., Singh, A. K. & Bhatt, B. P. Biomass production and carbon stock in psidium guajava orchards
under hot and sub-humid climate. Current Science 120(10), 1627–1635. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v120/i10/1627-1635 (2021).
52. Shinde, S. M., Turkhade, P. D., Deshmukh, S. B. & Narkhede, G. W. Carbon sequestration potential of some fruit trees in Satara
District of Maharashtra India. Econ. Environ. Constr. 21(1), 359–362 (2015).
53. Ali, L. M., Hassan, H. E., El-Raei, A. E., Ahmed, A. A. & Saleh, S. S. The prospect of using guava leaf extract for biosynthesizing
chitosan nanoparticles. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanotechnol. 10, 045005. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6254/ab4804 (2019).
54. Somchaidee, P. & Tedsree, K. Green synthesis of high dispersion and narrow size distribution of zero-valent iron nanoperticles
using guava leaf (Psidium Guajava L.) extract. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanotechnol. 9, 035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6254/aad5d7
(2018).
55. Simao, A. A., Marques, T. R., Marcussi, S. & Correa, A. D. Aqueous extract of Psidium guajava leaves: Phenolic compounds and
inhibitory potential on digestive enzymes. Ann. Braz. Acad. Sci. 89, 2155–2165. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160067
(2017).
56. Cheng, K. et al. Evaluation of extraction and degradation methods to obtain chickpea saponin B1 from chickpea (Cicer arietinum
L.). Molecules 22, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22020332 (2017).
57. Xiaoli, X. et al. Determination of oligosaccharides contents in 19 cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds by high perfor-
mance liquid chromatography. Food Chem. 111, 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.039 (2008).
58. Sofi, S. A., Singh, J., Muzaffar, K., Mir, A. S. & Dar, B. N. Effect of germination time on physico-chemical functional, pasting,
rheology and electrophoretic characteristics of chickpea flour. J. Food Meas. Charact. 14, 2380–2392. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11694-020-00485-2 (2020).
59. Putra, R. S., Amri, R. Y. & Ayu, M. Turbidity Removal of Synthetic wastewater Using Biocoagulants Based on Protein and Tannin.
AIP Conf. Proc. 2242, 040028. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0007846 (2020).
60. Hapani, U., Highland, H. N., Solanki, H. & George, L.-B. Extraction of cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass and their application
in handmade paper making. Econ. Environ. Constr. 27, S358–S364 (2021).
61. Li, P. et al. Synthesis and biological activity of isoflavone derivatives from chickpea as potent anti-diabetic agents. Molecules 20(9),
17016–17040. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200917016 (2015).
62. Krishnamurthy, A. & Amritkumar, P. Synthesis and characterization of eco-friendly bioplastic from low-cost plant resources. SN
Appl. Sci. 1, 1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1460-x (2019).
63. Durmaz, B. U. & Aytac, A. Effects of polyol-based plasticizer types and concentration on the properties of polyvinyl alcohol and
casein blend films. J. Polym. Environ.ent 29, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01881-x (2020).
64. Gorrasi, G. & Pantani, R. Hydrolysis and biodegradation of poly (lactic acid). Polymer 279, 119–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/12_
2016_12 (2017).
65. Maisanaba, S. et al. Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity studies on migration extracts of nanocomposites with potential use in food
packaging. Food Chem. Toxicol. 66, 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.02.011 (2014).
66. Amin, R., Chowdhury, M. A. & Kowser, A. Characterization and performance analysis of composite bioplastics synthesized using
titanium dioxide nanoparticles with corn starch. Helion 5, e0202009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02009 (2019).
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
67. Lico, E., Rapa, V., Drushku, S. & Chatzitheodoridis, E. Morphological and chemical study of recycled plastic materials by using
scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive analysis. Mater. Protect.on 52, 231–236 (2011).
68. Tran, T. N. et al. Transparent and flexible amorphous cellulose-acrylic hybrids. Chem. Eng. J. 287, 196–204 (2016).
69. Papadopoulou, E. L. et al. Sustainable active food packaging from poly (lactic acid) and cocoa bean shells. ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces 11(34), 31317–31327 (2019).
70. Tran, T. N. et al. Bioelastomers based on cocoa shell waste with antioxidant ability. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 1(7), 1700002 (2017).
71. Khan, M. Q. et al. Fabrication of antibacterial electrospun cellulose acetate/silver-sulfadiazine nanofibers composites for wound
dressings applications. Polym. Test. 74, 39–44 (2019).
72. Poulose, S., Jönkkäri, I., Hedenqvist, M. S. & Kuusipalo, J. Bioplastic films with unusually good oxygen barrier properties based
on potato fruit-juice. RSC Adv. 11, 12543–12548. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA01178B (2021).
73. Ortega, F., Minnaard, J., Arce, V. B. & Garcia, M. A. Nanocomposite starch films: Cytotoxicity studies and their application as
cheese packaging. Food Bioscience 53, 102562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102562 (2023).
74. Siakeng, R., Jawaid, M., Asim, M. & Siengchin, S. Accelerated weathering and soil burial effect on biodegradability, colour and
texture of coir/pineapple leaf fibres/PLA biocomposites. Polymers 12(2), 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020458 (2020).
75. Anthony, R., Sharara, M. A., Runge, T. M. & Anex, R. P. Life cycle comparison of petroleum- and bio-based paper binder from
distillers grains (DG). Ind. Crops Prod. 96, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.014 (2017).
76. https://apps.carboncloud.com/climatehub/search?q=gellan%20gum
77. https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator#results
78. https://www.kuraray-poval.com/fileadmin/technical_information/brochures/poval/kuraray-poval-life-cycle-assessment.pdf
Author contributions
All authors contributed equally to the article.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in coopera-
tion with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.E. or W.A.E.O.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Vol:.(1234567890)