Properties of Eco-Friendly Concrete Contained Limestone and Ceramic Tiles Waste Exposed To High Temperature
Properties of Eco-Friendly Concrete Contained Limestone and Ceramic Tiles Waste Exposed To High Temperature
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04482-x
Received: 18 October 2019 / Accepted: 19 March 2020 / Published online: 30 March 2020
© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2020
Abstract
In this recent work, ceramic tiles wastes (CW) were utilized as coarse aggregates in different weight fraction ratios starting
with 10% till 100% at an increment of 10% in production of normal concrete. Also, 5% of cement weight was substituted
via using limestone powder (LP). Slump value, fresh and dry density, absorption ratio and compressive and splitting tensile
strengths were tested at 25 °C. As well, dry density and compressive and splitting tensile strengths were found after exposing
the specimens to three target temperatures (200, 400 and 600) °C for 2 h. The results indicated that the usage of CW led
to enhancing compressive and splitting tensile strengths at room temperature and the maximum increases in these strengths
for 60% of CW, which were 164% and 128%, respectively, compared with normal concrete without CW and LP. The usage
of CW enhances behavior of mixes exposed to high temperatures. The maximum remaining compressive strength ratios of
tested series exposed to 200 °C and 400 °C were 0.882 and 0.804, respectively, for mixes made by using 50% of CW, and
the maximum residual compressive strength ratio for series exposed to 600 °C was 0.780 for mix containing 70% of CW.
Maximum remaining splitting tensile strength ratios of three series exposed to (200, 400 and 600) °C were 0.969, 0.895 and
0.836, respectively, for mix containing 70% of CW. The obtained results can give indication of producing environmental
concrete with enhanced mechanical properties via using ceramic waste.
Keywords Waste ceramic · Density · Water absorption ratio · Splitting tensile strength · Compressive strength · Elevated
temperature
123
4388 Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404
the results of concrete properties, they also concluded that concluded maximum compressive strength of the concrete.
reusing CW led to decreasing utilized lands for dumping off And Devi et al. [12] replaced sand, gravel and sand and gravel
and scrap yards [2]. together with 50% of CW with 10% increment with and con-
Many researchers utilized ceramic tile waste for producing cluded optimum compressive strength, higher absorption and
concrete to examine concrete properties such as compressive smaller workability when CW replaced with sand. In addi-
and flexural strength [1, 4–6]. Mashitah et al. [1] showed that tion to that, CW has also been utilized with other contents
it is possible to utilize ceramic tile wastes as coarse aggre- to study the mechanical properties of concrete. As Awoyera
gates with different volume ratios in production of concrete et al. [13] used 75% of CW to replace gravel and 10% lat-
blocks with compressive strength ranged in (41.4–48.8) MPa, erite content and found that higher splitting tensile strength
while Abdullah et al. [4] reported that concrete contained and compressive strength at 28 days and smaller workability
ceramic tile waste as gravel had compressive strength of as compared with reference concrete. And Mazenan et al.
85–100% higher as compared with concrete made by using [14] used 30% of CW and 20% of palm oil fuel ash (POFA)
ordinary gravel. And Daniyal and Ahmad [5] found that as cement substitution and found that compressive strength
the usage of ceramic tile waste (CTW) could improve con- of concrete is at acceptable and satisfactory level. As based
crete properties, and the optimal flexural and compressive on highlighting the above-reviewed literature, utilizing CW
strengths were greater than reference concrete. Moreover, partial and/or full replacement with sand, gravel and normal
Guendouz and Boukhelkhal [6] used ceramic tile waste aggregates are highly recommended if strength is concerned
(10–60%) with ceramic sanitary ware together to examine [15].
the flowability of sand concrete [FSC]. Their results showed Moreover, few researchers used recycled CW as concrete
that there was a reduction in diameter of slump flow from 120 aggregates to study the mechanical properties of concrete.
to 100 cm, while time of flow had been increased from 32 to As Khalid et al. [16] used 35% of recycled CW and obtained
35 s by using 60% of tile’s CW and ceramic sanitary wares. high compressive strength as compared with ordinary con-
Also, an improvement has been observed in the compressive crete, whereas Andrzejuk et al. [17] concluded no changes
and flexural strengths of the produced concrete. in mechanical properties of concrete when replacing recy-
Although very few studies had been carried on using CTW, cled CW aggregates with ordinary aggregates for producing
however, considering the variety of CW, much research work mineral–asphalt mixes. Through reviewing the literature on
has been viewed on utilizing CW as full or partial replace- replacing normal aggregates, soft clay pottery type of CW
ment with cement and/or mortar for studying their properties was utilized for producing soft concrete and found high
and characteristics. Reig et al. [7] studied the microstruc- bending and compressive strength, low absorbability and
ture and properties of alkali-activated mortars and pastes abrasion [18]. And normal aggregates were replaced with
of cement contained CW. They pointed out compressive fine bone china CW and found more suitable for hard and
strength of 22–41 MPa at an age of 7 days at 65 °C curing durable concrete [19]. Moreover, the distribution size of CW
temperature. However, Lim et al. [3] concluded that compres- is significantly affecting the mechanical properties of fresh
sive strength is dependent on the w/b ratio and concentration concrete. As sanitary CW with two different distribution sizes
of sodium in the concrete solution. Furthermore, sand and (0–4 mm and 4–8 mm) was used as normal aggregates, such
cement are replaced with 100% and 40%, respectively, of sanitary CW was pre-treated by two different ways: harden-
CW to produce mortar and obtained compressive strength ing and exposing to humidity proceeding to hardening. The
higher than reference mortar, whereas the shrinkage reduced second way of treatment exposed useful influence on ven-
by 16% when compared with reference mortar [3]. Interest- tilation, flexural and compressive strength of concrete [20].
ingly, Ikponmwosa and Ehikhuenmen [8] found that ceramic But Jackiewicz-Rek et al. [21] concluded that cement could
waste material is not appropriate for the usage in production be replaced with maximum of 20% of sanitary CW which
of concrete structures if the compressive strength is the main caused reduction in shrinkage and increment in flexural and
parameter, while they recommend that less than 75% ratio of compressive strength, whereas Nasr et al. [22] found increase
CW can be utilized in the construction of non-structural and in flexure strength around 5% and decrease in compressive
structural elements. strength around 6% in the production of concrete by substi-
Furthermore, many researchers highlighted the full and/or tution cement with 20% of sanitary CW. Moreover, Halicka
partial replacement of sand and/or gravel with CW for the et al. [23] studied abrasion resistant of concrete contained
production of concrete and/or mortar to improve durability sanitary ceramic waste as an aggregate and get a strength
and mechanical properties of the concrete [9–12]. As Man- abrasion resistant level of 80–95% of control one. Awoyera
davi et al. [10] utilized CW as part of substitution of normal et al. [15] found that using the waste of ceramic tiles as aggre-
sand and found that the best ratio of CW is 40% which could gates in concrete can lead to increase the compression and
improve the durability and the strength of the concrete. Fur- the splitting tensile strengths noticeably with increasing age
thermore, Dina et al. [11] replaced 100% sand with CW and of curing compared with normal concrete. Many researchers
123
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404 4389
123
4390 Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404
1 Mashitah et al. [1] Ceramic tile waste Utilize CTW as coarse aggregate with
different volumetric ratios
Increased compressive strength in ranged
41.4–48.8 MPa
2 Abdullah et al. [4] Replace gravel with CTW in concrete
Increased 85–100% compressive strength
as compared with concrete containing
gravel
3 Daniyal and Ahmad [5] Concluded that CTW improved
compressive and flexural strength and
higher than reference concrete
4 Guendouz and Boukhelkhal [6] Used CTW (10–60%) along with sanitary
ceramic for examining the flowability of
sand concrete.
Slump flow diameter decreased from 120
to 100 cm
Slump flow time increased from 32 to 35 s.
Improvement in compressive and flexural
strength
5 Reig et al. [7] Ceramic waste Compressive strength increased from 22 to
41 MPa at age of 7 days at curing of
65 °C
6 Ikponmwosa and Ehikhuenmen [8] CW is not appropriate material for
producing concrete, if the main object is
to increase compressive strength
7 Mandavi et al. [10] Replaced CW with sand
Improved durability and strength at 40% of
CW
8 Dina et al. [11] Maximum compressive strength achieved
at 100% replacement of sand with CW
9 Devi et al. [12] Replaced 50% of CW with 10% increment
with sand, gravel and sand and gravel
together
Achieved optimum compressive strength,
higher absorption and smaller
workability when sand replaced with CW
10 Awoyera et al. [13] Used 75% of CW to replace gravel and
10% laterite content.
Found that higher splitting tensile strength
and compressive strength at 28 days and
smaller workability as compared with
reference concrete
11 Mazenan et al. [14] Used 30% of CW and 20% of palm oil fuel
ash (POFA) as cement substitution
Found compressive strength of concrete is
acceptable and satisfactory level
12 Awoyera et al. [15] CW Utilizing CW partial and/or full
replacement with sand, gravel and
normal aggregates is highly
recommended if strength is concerned
123
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404 4391
Table 1 continued
S. no. Researchers Ceramic waste Remarks
123
4392 Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404
Table 1 continued
S. no. Researchers Ceramic waste Remarks
28 Cristiano [31] Ceramic waste powder Lower density of CW caused better slump
values and increase compressive strength
of fresh concrete
29 Li et al. [32] Utilized lower density CW powder
Increased 85% compressive strength at age
of 7 and 28 days at 20% of CW powder
30 Ayat et al. [33] CW and limestone (LS) CW and limestone (LS) have been utilized
for replacing cement and coarse
aggregate, respectively, and found better
prediction of compressive strength on the
basis of simulation work
31 Kim et al. [34] LS The particle size to higher volumetric ratio
of LS reduces compression strength and
benefitting the emission
32 Bonavetti et al. [35] Replaced cement in normal concrete with
LS filler
Decreased compressive strength at age of
28 days
33 Bhuiyan [36] without changing w/b ratio, the
replacement of cement with LS caused
increment in stiffness, durability, tensile
and compressive strength
34 Leo et al. [38] LS and PFA The utilization of LS and PFA could also
increase the mechanical properties of
normal concrete
35 Phung et al. [37] LS LS substitution could promote CO2 uptake
despite similar carbonation depth
36 Irassar et al. [54] LS and dolomite Replacing cement with maximum of 10%
of LS could deliver better mechanical
properties
But if adding 10% dolomite in the same
mixture could reduce mechanical
properties of normal concrete
9
Number of Arcles on Recycled
6 Ceramic Waste
mixer and mixed for 1 min. Then, sand, cement and limestone 1 min. Finally, the remaining quantity of water was added to
powder (LP) were added to mixing and mixed for 1 min. A premixing and mixed for additional 3 min. When the mixing
half quantity of water was added to mixing and mixed for of mixing was finished, workability and fresh density were
123
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404 4393
120
3.3.3 Compressive Strength
100
Compressive strength was tested for cubes by using the
instructions of BS 1881 standard [43]where the age of test-
80 ing compressive strength was 7 and 28 days. The average of
Passing [%]
40
3.3.4 Splitting Tensile Strength
123
4394 Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404
Table 2 Chemical component of used ceramic in recent study Table 3 Properties of aggregates used in the concrete mixes
Element Oxide Oxide % Oxide % Sigma Number of ions Property Sand Gravel Ceramic Limestones
123
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404 4395
lap together to complete the shortage in the size distribution sity (density of each mix/density of reference mix) is varied
of each and made mixes more cohesive and workable while between 1.007 and 0.852. The relationship of relative density
replacing all or 90% of gravel by ceramic led to reducing with CW ratio is approximately similar for fresh and dry den-
suddenly workability and slump value as a result of non-well sity at 28 days as shown in Fig. 9b. Furthermore, the curve
sized particles distribution of this ceramic and small amount of relative density to CW ratio for dry density at 7 days is
of gravel. somewhat different from other curves, (see Fig. 9b).
123
4396 Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404
Fig. 6 Pictures of slump test; a reference mix, b mix with 10% CW, c mix with 40% CW, d mix with 60% CW, e mix with 90% CW and f mix
with 100% CW
The obtained results are shown in Table 5. Compressive Table 4 displays the gotten values of splitting tensile strength.
strength increased via using CW as coarse aggregate. The It can be observed that this strength was improved via using
maximum compressive strength at 7 days was 44 MPa for CW and the maximum value was 3.67 MPa at 60% CW. The
25CWP70, while maximum compressive strength at 28 days curve which relates relationship between relative splitting
was 54 MPa for 25CWP60. This increase in compressive tensile strength (strength of each mix/strength of reference
strength is a result of pozzolanic performance of CW which concrete) and CW ratios is shown in Fig. 7g, which has
led to the production of hydration components (CSH gel), approximately the same ascending slope till peak point of
and consequently, the strength was up surging, where this 60% CW, then turn into descending slope with minimum
outcome was found via other researchers as Zegardlo et al. relative strength of 1,073 at 100% CW. The specimens made
and Medina et al. [48, 49]. The curves related to relative by usage of CW failed in same type of failure of reference
compressive strength (strength of each mix/strength of ref- specimens which is brittle one as shown in Fig. 8. It found an
erence mix) at ages of 7 and 28 days with CW ratios were exponential expression which relates compressive and split-
somewhat similar with peak point at 70% and 60% of CW, ting tensile strengths which is as follows:
respectively (see Fig. 9d). Also, it is observed that relative
compressive strength values at age of 7 days were greater
than corresponding values at age of 28 days which means fccw 6.1482 e0.5931fscw (1)
that the usage of CW led to increasing the rate of gotten
the compressive strength if compared with concrete without
CW. The failure type of specimens contained CW is brittle where f ccw and fscw are compressive and splitting tensile
one and is not different from failure of reference concrete strengths with CW at 28 days age, respectively. The coeffi-
specimen (see Fig. 7 ). cient of determination (R2 ) is equal to 0.999.
123
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404 4397
4.2 The Results at Elevated Temperatures density was a result of emancipation of chemically linked
water from paste of cement and increase in voids filled with
Once the concrete is exposed to a high temperature, its behav- air in concrete. It can be observed that the releasing of this
ior is significantly influenced via properties of its components chemically linked water is depended on the amount of CW
like cement paste, aggregate type, bond between aggregate in concrete mixes and its exposure to temperature degrees.
and cement and corresponding thermal properties between When the CW’s amount and the exposure’s temperature are
cement and aggregate [50, 51]. For normal concrete, the to some degree less, the emancipation of chemically linked
chemical and physical configuration of concrete is altered water is also less and this is clear at density and relative den-
significantly at high temperature, where water chemically sity values.
related is released from C–S–H gel in noteworthy at tem-
perature more than 100 °C. The interior stresses, which is a
result of the aggregates’ thermal stretching and releasing of 4.2.2 Compressive Strength
water chemically related to cement paste, are beginning at
300 °C and lead to micro-crack within the concrete [52]. At The obtained results for compressive strength of specimens
530 °C, the concrete shrank due to detach of calcium hydrox- exposed to elevated temperature are shown in Table 5. Com-
ide which is more significant compounds in paste of cement pressive strength values were decreased with increasing
[53]. temperature degree of concrete’s exposure. The usage of CW
in concrete mixes led to lessening the decrease in compres-
sive strength when compared with reference, mix and this
4.2.1 Density reduction was lessened with increasing amount of CW in
concrete. The minimum compressive strength and residual
The obtained results are shown in Table 5. It found that den- compressive strength were 13 MPa, 0.394, respectively, for
sity was reduced with the usage of CW and exposure to 600R0 mix. However, for concrete mixes made by usage of
the elevated temperature. This reduction in density increased CW, the minimum compressive strength to residual com-
with increasing amount of CW in concrete and increasing the pressive strength ratio was 23 MPa, 0.605, respectively, for
concrete’s exposure to temperature degrees. The minimum 600CWP100 mix. The positive role of CW was appearing
density was 1715 kg/m3 for mix 600CWP100. The relative clearly for series subjected to (400–600) °C in higher rela-
density values for series exposed to 200 °C are higher than tive compressive strength, (see Fig. 9f), while these values of
the corresponding values of this relative density of series at relative compressive strength of series subjected to 200 °C
room temperature, (see Fig. 9e) while values of relative den- were approximately similar to series at room temperature.
sity for series exposed to 400 °C and 600 °C are somewhat This decrease can be returned to emancipation of crystal-
similar to corresponding values of series at 25 °C till weight lization’s water which led to decreased content of Ca(OH)2 ,
ratio 60% of CW, as shown in Fig. 9e, and when CW ratio breakdown of CSH gel and establishment micro-cracks. But,
is more than 60%, the relative density values had less com- the helpful effect of CW can be returned back to pozzolanic
pared with the series at room temperature. This reduction in ability of CW for some enhancement in compressive strength
123
4398 Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404
at high temperature. Residual compressive strength ratio val- were 0.882 and 0.804, respectively, for CW of 50%, while
ues (compressive strength of any series for specific CW this maximum residual compressive strength ratio for series
ratio/compressive strength for series at room temperature exposed to 600 °C was 0.780 for CW of 70%. The failure
for the same specific CW ratio, i.e., f’c of 200CWP10/f’c of specimens with CW which were exposed to high tem-
of 25CW10) had small changes with different amounts of peratures was more brittle than the same specimens at room
CW as is shown in Fig. 9g. Maximum residual compressive temperature, and this brittleness increased through increase
strength ratio results for series exposed to 200 °C and 400 °C temperature of exposure as shown in Fig. 7 (Table 6).
123
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404 4399
123
4400 Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404
1.1
1.05
1.05
1
1
Relave slump value
0.95
Relave density
0.9 0.95
0.85
0.8 0.9
fresh density
0.75
6.6
1.8
room temperature
5.6
1.6
4.6
1.4
3.6
1.2
2.6
1
Absorpon rao
1.6 0.8 Compressive strength at 7 days
Compressive strength at 28 days
0.6 0.6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CW [%] CW [%]
(c) (d)
1.05 3.5
3
Relave compressive strength
Relave dry density
2.5
0.95
2
1.5
0.85
Series at 25 ºC 1 Series at 25 ºC
Series at 200 ºC Series at 200 ºC
Series at 400 ºC 0.5
Series at 400 ºC
Series at 600 ºC
Series at 600 ºC
0.75 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CW [%] CW [%]
(e) (f)
Fig. 9 Relationship between tested properties and CW, a relative slump ual compressive strength and CW, h relative splitting tensile strength
and CW, b relative density and CW, c relative absorption ratio and CW, and CW, i residual splitting tensile strength and CW and l compressive
d relative compressive strength at room temperature and CW, e relative strength and splitting tensile strength
dry density and CW, f relative compressive strength and CW, g resid-
4.2.3 Splitting Tensile Strength reduced with increase in temperature degree of specimens’
exposure. The same positive effect of CW in lessening
The splitting tensile strength results are shown in Table 5. decrease in compressive strength is seen, but in less influ-
Also, it found that values of splitting tensile strength are ence. The minimum splitting tensile strength to its residual
123
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404 4401
1.0 2.3
0.9 2.1
1.9
0.7
1.7
0.6
1.5
0.5
1.3
0.4
Series at 200 ºC 1.1
0.3 Series at 25 ºC
0.2 Series at 400 ºC 0.9 Series at 200 ºC
Series at 400 ºC
0.1 Series at 600 ºC 0.7
Series at 600 ºC
0.0 0.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
CW [%]
CW [%]
(g) (h)
1
51
Residual Spling tensile strength rao
0.9 46
41
0.8 Compressive strength
36
0.7 31
26
0.6
Series at 25 ºC
21 series at 200 ºC
series at 400 ºC
0.5 16 series at 600 ºC
Series at 200 ºC
11
Expon. (Series at 25 ºC )
0.4 Series at 400 ºC Expon. (series at 200 ºC )
6 Power (series at 400 ºC )
Series at 600 ºC
Expon. (series at 600 ºC )
0.3 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
CW [%] Spling tensile strength
(i) (j)
Fig. 9 continued
ratio was 1.32 MPa, 0.459, respectively, for 600R0 mix. [ITZ] and bonds between cement paste and CW. The expo-
However, for concrete mixes made by usage of CW, the sure of specimens to elevated temperatures did not lead to
minimum of splitting tensile strength and its residual were change their failure type; the specimens made via using CW
1.93 MPa, 0.626, respectively, for 600CWP100 mix. As failed in brittle manner and the plane of failure was in cement
shown in Fig. 9h, the relationship of relative splitting tensile paste and CW particles as shown in Fig. 8g). For each series,
strength with CW for series exposed to 200 °C is approxi- an experimental formula was found which relates compres-
mately similar to series at room temperature, where for series sive and splitting tensile strengths, (see Fig. 9l). For series
subjected to (400–600) °C, this relationship is different with exposed to 200 °C, its exponential formula is the following:
higher relative splitting tensile strength values, especially for
series subjected to 400 °C. Maximum residual splitting ten- fccw200 9.3164e0.4592fscw200 (2)
sile strength ratio values for series exposed to (200, 400,
600) °C were 0.969, 0.895 and 0.836, respectively, for mix where f ccw200 and fscw200 are compressive and splitting
containing 70% of CW, which are greater than the obtained tensile strengths by usage of CW that exposed to 200 °C at
maximum residual compressive strength ratio values for all age of 28 days, respectively. The R2 of formula 2 is 0.753.
series. It can be exegesis this enhancement in residual split- It found a power formula for series that exposed to 400 °C
ting tensile strength ratio to roughness and irregularity of which is as follows:
CW particles which can enhance interfacial transition zone
fccw400 10.33fscw1.191
400 (3)
123
4402 Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404
where f ccw400 and fscw400 are compressive and splitting dry density were for a mix that contains 100% of CW, which
tensile strengths using CW exposed to 400 °C at age of were (2066–2000.5) kg/m3 , respectively.
28 days, respectively. The R2 of formula 3 equals 0.657. The The water absorption increased with using CW in con-
following exponential formula is found for series exposed to crete specimens, and this change increased when ratio of
600 °C, CW increased. So, the maximum water absorption ratio was
4.61 for mix that contains 100% of CW that was 854% of
fccw600 8.2689e0.5268fscw600 (4) reference mixture’s corresponding value. The water absorp-
tion ratio increased by 569% for concrete that had 60% of
CW.
where f ccw600 and fscw600 are compressive and splitting Concrete specimens that had tile ceramic waste (CW)
tensile strengths via CW exposed to 600 °C at age of 28 days, behaved in a well way when exposed to elevated temper-
respectively. R2 of formula 4 is 0.837. ature, where all their tested properties decreased at a lower
ratio compared with reference concrete.
The density decreased for specimens exposed to high tem-
5 Conclusions peratures, where this reduction increased with increasing the
ratio of CW and increased temperature degree’s exposure.
After this recent study, the subsequent conclusions were The minimum decrease in density was 14.3% for concrete
found: that had 100% of CW and exposed to 600 °C, which was
Using tile ceramic waste and LP as gravel and alterna- 1715 kg/m3 .
tive of 5% of cement, respectively, in concrete mixes led Compressive and splitting tensile strengths decreased
to increasing the compressive and splitting tensile strengths. when concrete specimens subjected to elevated temperature,
The maximum increase was 64% and 28% in compressive and this reduction was augmented with increase in tem-
and splitting tensile strengths, respectively, for the concrete perature degree’s exposure. The minimum compressive and
that substituted 60% of its coarse aggregate by tile ceramic splitting tensile strengths were 23 MPa and 1.93 MPa, respec-
waste (CW). Also, usage of CW led to increasing the gotten tively, for mix containing 100% CW and exposed to 600 °C.
value of compressive strength with age, which was clear in Maximum compressive strength was (46, 41.5 and 40) MPa
higher values of this strength at the age of 7 days. for concrete that had 60% CW and subjected to 200 °C,
The slump values reduced via using CW in the production 400 °C and 600 °C, respectively, while the maximum splitting
of concrete, where the minimum decrease in slump value was tensile strength was (3.42, 3.16 and 2.95) MPa for concrete
for a mix that contains 100% of CW, which was 74% of the that had 70% CW and exposed to (200, 400, 600) °C, respec-
slump value of reference mix. tively.
The density in the fresh and dry state decreased when CW The found experimental results show the high possibil-
is used in the concrete mix. The minimum fresh density and ity of production eco-friendly concrete through usage of tile
123
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404 4403
ceramic waste by the way of substitution of gravel in ratios technical requirements. In: 2018 E3S Web of Conf. 49, 00-01. EDP
around 60–70%, which has its enhanced mechanical prop- Sci.
18. Ogrodnik, P.; Szulej, J.: The assessment of possibility of using
erties at room temperature and high temperatures of range sanitary ceramic waste as concrete aggregate determination of the
(200–600) °C. basic material characteristics. Appl. Sci. 8(7), 1205 (2018)
19. Siddique, S.; Shrivastava, S.; Chaudhary, S.; Gupta, T.: Strength
and impact resistance properties of concrete containing fine bone
China ceramic aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 169, 289–298
References (2018)
20. Ogrodnik, P.; Szulej, J.: The impact of aeration of concrete based
1. Mashitah, M.D.; Kin, C.C.; Badorul, A.H.: Recycling of homoge- on ceramic aggregate exposed to high temperatures, on its strength
nous ceramic tiles for the production of concrete block. In: parameters. Constr. Build. Mater. 157, 909–916 (2017)
2008 International Symposium on Environmental Management: 21. Jackiewicz-Rek, W.; Zał˛egowski, K.; Garbacz, A.; Bissonnette, B.:
Hazardous-Environmental Management toward Sustainability, Properties of cement mortars modified with ceramic waste fillers.
pp. 22–23. Procedia Eng. 108, 681–687 (2015)
2. Patel, C.P.; Bhavsar, J.K.: Enhancement of concrete properties by 22. Nasr, M.S.; Hussain, T.H.; Najim, W.N.: Properties of cement mor-
replacing cement and fine aggregate with ceramic powder. J. Civ. tar containing biomass bottom ash and sanitary ceramic wastes as
Eng. Environ. Technol. 3(3), 232–236 (2016) a partial replacement of cement. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 9(10),
3. Lim, N.H.A.S.; Samadi, M.; Shafegat, A.; Ariffn, N.F.; Keyvanfar, 153–165 (2018)
A.; Sam, A.R.M.: Effect of homogenous ceramic waste on dry- 23. Halicka, A.; Ogrodnik, P.; Zegardlo, B.: Using ceramic sani-
ing shrinkage of mortar. J. Environ. Treat. Technol. 4(4), 149–152 tary ware waste as concrete aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 48,
(2016) 295–305 (2013)
4. Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Hussin, K.; Ghazali, C.M.R.; Jamaludin, 24. Ali, S.T.; El-Dieb, A.S.; Aboubakr, S.H.; Taha, M.M.R.: Utilization
S.B.: Concrete ceramic waste slab (CCWS). J. Eng. Res. Educ. of ceramic waste powder in self-compacting concrete. In: 2016
3, 139–145 (2006) Fourth International Conference on Sustainable.
5. Daniyal, M.; Ahmad, S.: Application of waste ceramic tile aggre- 25. Aly, S.T.; Kanaan, D.M.; El-Dieb, A.S.; Abu-Eishah, S.I.: Proper-
gates in concrete. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 4(12), ties of ceramic waste powder-based geo-polymer concrete. In: 2018
12808–12815 (2015) International Congress on Polymers in Concrete, pp. 429–435.
6. Guendouz, M.; Boukhelkhal, D.: Properties of flow able sand con- Springer, Cham
crete containing ceramic wastes. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 33(24), 26. Binici, H.: Effect of crushed ceramic and basaltic pumice as fine
2661–2683 (2019) aggregates on concrete mortars properties. Constr. Build. Mater.
7. Reig, L.; Tashima, M.M.; Soriano, L.; Borrachero, M.V.; Monzó, 21(6), 1191–1197 (2007)
J.; Payá, J.: Alkaline activation of ceramic waste materials. Waste 27. Raval, A.D.; Patel, I.N.; Pitroda, J.: Ceramic waste: Effective
Biomass Valoriz. 4(4), 729–736 (2013) replacement of cement for establishing sustainable concrete. Int. J.
8. Ikponmwosa, E.E.; Ehikhuenmen, S.O.: The effect of ceramic Eng. Trends Technol. (IJETT) 4(6), 2324–2329 (2013)
waste as coarse aggregate on strength properties of concrete. Nige- 28. Huseien, G.F.; Al-fasih, M.Y.; Mansor, S.B.; Hussein, K.H.: Perfor-
rian J. Technol. 36(3), 691–696 (2017) mance of self-compacting concrete with different sizes of recycled
9. Ulubeyli, G.Ç.; Bilir, T.; Artir, R.: Ceramic wastes usage as alterna- ceramic aggregates. Int. J. Innov. Res. Creat. Technol. (IJIRCT)
tive aggregate in mortar and concrete. Period. Eng. Nat. Sci. 5(2), 1(3), 264–269 (2015)
194–201 (2017) 29. Subaşı, S.; Öztürk, H.; Emiroğlu, M.: Utilizing of waste ceramic
10. Mandavi, H.K.; Srivastava, V.; Agarwal, V.C.: Durability of con- powders as filler material in self-consolidating concrete. Constr.
crete with ceramic waste as fine aggregate durability of concrete Build. Mater. 149, 567–574 (2017)
with ceramic waste as fine aggregate replacement. Int. J. Eng. Tech. 30. Khalid, F.S.; Puteri, N.M.; Abdul, H.A.G.; Nurul, B.A.; Mohd,
Res. 3(8), 196–199 (2015) I.J.; Shahiron, S.M.H.W.I.: Utilization of palm fuel ash (POFA)
11. Dina, M.; Sadek, D.M.; El Nouhy, H.A.: Properties of paving units and ceramic waste as cement materials replacement in concrete
incorporating crushed ceramic. HBRC J. 10(2), 198–205 (2014) production. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7(3.9), 89–92 (2018)
12. Devi, V.S.; Gnanavel, B.K.; Murthi, P.; Madhanagopal, M.: Investi- 31. Cristiano, M.: The use of ceramic waste aggregates in concrete:
gation of novel sustainable concrete using optimization technique. a literary review. Conference concrete 2014 progetto e tecnologia
Adv. Mater. Proc. 2(2), 86–92 (2017) per il costruito tra xx e xxi secolo (2014)
13. Awoyera, P.O.; Akinmusuru, J.O.; Ndambuki, J.M.: Green concrete 32. Li, L.G.; Zhuo, Z.Y.; Zhu, J.; Chen, J.J.; Kwan, A.K.H.: Reutilizing
production with ceramic wastes and laterite. Constr. Build. Mater. ceramic polishing waste as powder filler in mortar to reduce cement
117, 29–36 (2016) content by 33% and increase strength by 85%. Powder Technol.
14. Mazenan, P.N.; Khalid, F.S.; Shahidan, S.; Shamsuddin, S.M.: 355, 119–126 (2019)
Review of palm oil fuel ash and ceramic waste in the production 33. Ayat, H.; Kellouche, Y.; Ghrici, M.; Boukhatem, B.: Compressive
of concrete. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. Conf. Ser. 271(1), strength prediction of limestone filler concrete using artificial neu-
012051 (2017) ral networks. Adv. Comput. Des. 3(3), 289–302 (2018)
15. Awoyera, P.O.; Ndambuki, J.M.; Akinmusuru, J.O.; Omole, D.O.: 34. Kim, Y.J.; Leeuwen, R.V.; Cho, B.Y.; Sriraman, V.; Torres, A.:
Characterization of ceramic waste aggregate concrete. HBRC J. Evaluation of the efficiency of limestone powder in concrete and
14(3), 282–287 (2018) the effects on the environment. Sustainability 10(2), 550 (2018)
16. Khalid, F.S.; Azmi, N.B.; Sumandi, K.A.S.M.; Mazenan, P.N.: 35. Bonavetti, V.; Donza, H.; Menendez, G.; Cabrera, O.; Irassar, E.F.:
Mechanical properties of concrete containing recycled concrete Limestone filler cement in low w/c concrete: a rational use of
aggregate (RCA) and ceramic waste as coarse aggregate replace- energy. Cement Concrete Res. 33(6), 865–871 (2003)
ment. AIP Conf. Proc. 1891(1), 020079 (2017) 36. Bhuiyan, S.: Permeability of concrete incorporation limestone filler
17. Andrzejuk, W.; Sałuch, M.; Zegardło, B.; Szczygielska, E.; and pulverized fuel ash (2012)
Żukiewicz-Sobczak, W.; Sobczak, P.; Wołyńczuk, K.: Properties
of recycled ceramic aggregates specified in WT-1 2014 aggregates-
123
4404 Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020) 45:4387–4404
37. Phung, Q.T.; Maes, N.; Jacques, D.; De Schutter, G.; Ye, G.: 46. Alrekabi, T.K.; Cunha, V.M.; Barros, J.A.: Reactive powder con-
Effect of limestone fillers on ca-leaching and carbonation of cement crete reinforced with steel fibers exposed to high temperatures. In:
pastes. Key Eng. Mater. 711, 269–276 (2016) 2017 IOP Conference Series: Mate. Sci. and Eng., vol. 246(1),
38. Leo, L.G.; Kwan, A.K.: Adding limestone fines as cementitious 012-020. IOP Publishing (2017)
paste replacement to improve tensile strength, stiffness and dura- 47. Hilal, N.N.: Performance of fiber normal-weight concrete exposed
bility of concrete. Cement Concrete Compos. 60, 17–24 (2015) to elevated temperatures. Iraqi J. Civ. Eng. 8(1), 1–14 (2012)
39. ASTM C311: Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly 48. Zegardło, B.; Szel˛ag, M.; Ogrodnik, P.: Ultra-high strength
Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete. concrete made with recycled aggregate from sanitary ceramic
ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2016) wastes—the method of production and the interfacial transition
40. ASTM C192/C192M-18: Standard Practice for Making and Curing zone. Constr. Build. Mater. 122, 736–742 (2016)
Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory. ASTM International, 49. Medina, C.; de Rojas, M.I.S.; Frias, M.: Freeze-thaw durability of
West Conshohocken (2018) recycled concrete containing ceramic aggregate. J. Clean. Prod. 40,
41. ASTM C143 – 89: Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic- 151–160 (2013)
Cement Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, pp. 85–86. 50. Arioz, O.: Effects of elevated temperatures on properties of con-
ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2018) crete. Fire Saf. J. 42(8), 516–522 (2007)
42. ASTM Designation C 138-86: Test Method for Unit Weight of 51. Bingöl, A.F.; Gül, R.: Effect of elevated temperatures and cooling
Concrete Specimens, Annual Book of ASTM, Standards ,Section 4, regimes on normal strength concrete. Fire Mater Int. J. 33(2), 79–88
Vol. 02, pp. 96–98. American Society for Testing and Materials, (2009)
Philadelphia 52. Hertz, K.D.: Concrete strength for fire safety design. Mag. Concrete
43. British Standard Institute: Method for Determination of Com- Res. 57(8), 445–453 (2005)
pressive Strength of Concrete Cubes, BS 1881: Part 116:1983, 53. Zega, C.J.; Di Maio, A.A.: Recycled concrete exposed to high tem-
pp. 215–217 peratures. Mag. Concrete Res. 58(10), 675–682 (2006)
44. ASTM C496: American Society for Testing and Materials, Stan- 54. Irassar, E.F.; Rahhal, V.; Tironi, A.; Trezza, M.; Pavlík, Z.;
dard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Pavlíková, M.; Jerman, M.; Cerný, R.: Utilization of ceramic wastes
Concrete Specimens, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, Philadel- as pozzolanic materials. In: Technical Proceedings of the NSTI
phia, vol. 04-02, pp. 5 (2011) Nanotechnology Conference and Expo, pp. 230–233 (2014)
45. ASTM C 642-06: Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption,
and Voids in Hardened Concrete, United States Am. Soc. Test.
Mater., pp 11–13 (2008)
123