Mark Scheme Roman City Life
Mark Scheme Roman City Life
Classical Civilisation
It is also responsible for developing new specifications to meet national requirements and the
needs of students and teachers. OCR is a not-for-profit organisation; any surplus made is
invested back into the establishment to help towards the development of qualifications and
support, which keep pace with the changing needs of today’s society.
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and students, to indicate the requirements
of the examination. It shows the basis on which marks were awarded by examiners. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions which took place at an examiners’ meeting before marking
commenced.
All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the published question papers and the report
on the examination.
© OCR 2022
MARKING INSTRUCTIONS
PREPARATION FOR MARKING
SCORIS
1. Make sure that you have accessed and completed the relevant training packages for on-screen marking: scoris assessor Online Training; OCR
Essential Guide to Marking.
2. Make sure that you have read and understood the mark scheme and the question paper for this unit. These are posted on the RM Cambridge
Assessment Support Portal http://www.rm.com/support/ca
3. Log-in to scoris and mark the required number of practice responses (“scripts”) and the number of required standardisation responses.
YOU MUST MARK 10 PRACTICE AND 10 STANDARDISATION RESPONSES BEFORE YOU CAN BE APPROVED TO MARK LIVE SCRIPTS.
MARKING
3. The schedule of dates is very important. It is essential that you meet the scoris 50% and 100% (traditional 40% Batch 1 and 100% Batch 2)
deadlines. If you experience problems, you must contact your Team Leader (Supervisor) without delay.
4. If you are in any doubt about applying the mark scheme, consult your Team Leader by telephone or the scoris messaging system, or by email.
Contradictory Responses
When a candidate provides contradictory responses, then no mark should be awarded, even if one of the answers is correct.
Short Answer Questions (requiring only a list by way of a response, usually worth only one mark per response)
Where candidates are required to provide a set number of short answer responses then only the set number of responses should be marked. The
response space should be marked from left to right on each line and then line by line until the required number of responses have been considered. The
remaining responses should not then be marked. Examiners will have to apply judgement as to whether a ‘second response’ on a line is a development
of the ‘first response’, rather than a separate, discrete response. (The underlying assumption is that the candidate is attempting to hedge their bets and
therefore getting undue benefit rather than engaging with the question and giving the most relevant/correct responses.)
Short Answer Questions (requiring a more developed response, worth two or more marks)
If the candidates are required to provide a description of, say, three items or factors and four items or factors are provided, then mark on a similar basis
– that is downwards (as it is unlikely in this situation that a candidate will provide more than one response in each section of the response space.)
6. Always check the pages (and additional objects if present) at the end of the response in case any answers have been continued there. If the candidate
has continued an answer there then add a tick to confirm that the work has been seen.
• anything is written in the answer space and is not worthy of credit (this includes text and symbols).
Team Leaders must confirm the correct use of the NR button with their markers before live marking commences and should check this when
reviewing scripts.
J199/22 Mark Scheme June 2022
8. The scoris comments box is used by your team leader to explain the marking of the practice responses. Please refer to these comments when
checking your practice responses. Do not use the comments box for any other reason.
If you have any questions or comments for your team leader, use the phone, the scoris messaging system, or e-mail.
9. Assistant Examiners will send a brief report on the performance of candidates to their Team Leader (Supervisor) via email by the end of the marking
period. The report should contain notes on particular strengths displayed as well as common errors or weaknesses. Constructive criticism of the
question paper/mark scheme is also appreciated.
On the borderline of this level and the one below At bottom of level
Just enough achievement on balance for this Above bottom and either below middle or at middle of level (depending on number of marks
level available)
Meets the criteria but with some slight Above middle and either below top of level or at middle of level (depending on number of marks
inconsistency available)
Consistently meets the criteria for this level At top of level
J199/22 Mark Scheme June 2022
11. Annotations
Annotation Meaning
Blank Page
Seen
Tick
Questionable idea
Incorrect
Unclear
Omission
Repetition
Benefit of Doubt
Too Vague
Spelling
Introduction
Your first task as an Examiner is to become thoroughly familiar with the material on which the examination depends. You should ensure that
you have copies of these materials:
You should ensure also that you are familiar with the administrative procedures related to the marking process. These are set out in the OCR
booklet Instructions for Examiners. If you are examining for the first time, please read carefully Appendix 5 Introduction to Script Marking:
Notes for New Examiners. Please ask for help or guidance whenever you need it. Your first point of contact is your Team Leader.
Please study this Mark Scheme carefully. The Mark Scheme is an integral part of the process that begins with the setting of the question paper
and ends with the awarding of grades. Question papers and Mark Schemes are developed in association with each other so that issues of
differentiation and positive achievement can be addressed from the very start.
This Mark Scheme is a working document; it is not exhaustive; it does not provide ‘correct’ answers. The Mark Scheme can only provide ‘best
guesses’ about how the question will work out, and it is subject to revision after we have looked at a wide range of scripts.
The Examiners’ Standardisation Meeting will ensure that the Mark Scheme covers the range of candidates’ responses to the questions, and
that all Examiners understand and apply the Mark Scheme in the same way. The Mark Scheme will be discussed and amended at the
meeting, and administrative procedures will be confirmed. Co-ordination scripts will be issued at the meeting to exemplify aspects of
candidates’ responses and achievements; the co-ordination scripts then become part of this Mark Scheme.
Before the Standardisation Meeting, you should read and mark in pencil a number of scripts, in order to gain an impression of the range of
responses and achievement that may be expected.
Please read carefully all the scripts in your allocation and make every effort to look positively for achievement throughout the ability range.
Always be prepared to use the full range of marks.
J199/22 Mark Scheme June 2022
2 Why might the Romans have enjoyed seeing a 4 Allow any acceptable points which focus on the
contest between a heavily armed gladiator and a (AO1 differences between the two types of gladiators
retiarius, such as that shown in Source A? 2,
AO2
Make two points. 2)
3 (a) Gladiator B has raised his finger to surrender. 2 Accept thumbs up/down to mean death/mercy for the
(AO1) gladiator.
Describe two things which would happen next, either in Accept some form of crowd reaction.
the crowd or in the arena.
5 How does the tomb show that Naevoleia Tyche and 4 Allow any acceptable points using details from the tomb
her husband were successful citizens of Pompeii? [AO1 or the inscription
2,
Make two points, using details from the tombs and the AO2 2]
inscription.
Guidance on applying the marking grids for the 8-mark detailed response
Two Assessment Objectives are being assessed in this question: AO1 (Demonstrate knowledge and understanding…) and AO2 (Analyse, interpret and evaluate…). The
two Assessment Objectives are equally weighted, and both worth 4 marks. The weighting of assessment objectives remains consistent throughout the levels. Responses
are credited for AO1 for the detail and accuracy of the knowledge of the sources, their context and interpretation. Responses are credited for AO2 for how well the
question is addressed, selecting relevant evidence from the sources and the conclusions drawn.
Examiners must use a best fit approach when applying the mark scheme. This means considering both the strengths and the weaknesses of a response, particularly if it is
imbalanced in terms of the two assessment objectives, when deciding which level reflects the overall performance. AO1 and AO2 are closely interlinked. Typically
responses demonstrate both knowledge and understanding and analysis and interpretation of that knowledge in reasonably equal measure. In this way, a total mark of 6
might reflect a balance of 3 (AO1) + 3 (AO2), for example. However, an overly-descriptive response may focus on details from the sources but not draw many valid
conclusions; this would be considered AO1 heavy. Care should be taken when marking such answers, as the lack of AO2 skills should limit the level at which this work can
be rewarded; it should not be possible to achieve a mark of 7 made up of 6 (AO1) + 1 (AO2).
Examples of specific issues or common unbalanced approaches to the question will be identified when finalising the mark scheme in preparation for standardisation.
Details about how to deal with this will be included in the Guidance column for the question.
Level Mark Characteristics of Performance
4 7–8 • consistently accurate and detailed knowledge and understanding of classical sources, using both those given in assessment and own
wider knowledge (AO1)
shows very good understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and possible interpretations
• a well-argued response to the question which is supported by a range of well-selected evidence (AO2)
includes critical analysis, interpretation and evaluation
3 5–6 • accurate knowledge and understanding of classical sources, using both those given in assessment and own wider knowledge (AO1)
shows good understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible interpretations
• a focused response to the question which is supported by a range of evidence (AO2)
includes relevant analysis, interpretation and evaluation
2 3–4 • sound, mostly accurate, knowledge and understanding of classical sources, using both those given in assessment and own wider
knowledge (AO1)
shows some understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible interpretations
• engages with the general topic of the question, and is supported by limited range of evidence (AO2)
includes some analysis, interpretation and evaluation
1 1–2 • limited knowledge and understanding of classical sources; responses may only make use of the sources given in the assessment (AO1)
shows limited understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible interpretations
J199/22 Mark Scheme June 2022
• little attempt at a very basic explanation of the topic of the question, supported by a few references to evidence (AO2)
includes isolated analysis, interpretation and evaluation
0 0 • No response or no response worthy of credit
J199/22 Mark Scheme June 2022
Guidance on applying the marking grids for the 15-mark extended response
Two Assessment Objectives are being assessed in this question: AO1 (Demonstrate knowledge and understanding…) and AO2 (Analyse, interpret and evaluate…). The
two Assessment Objectives are not equally weighted, as AO1 is worth 5 marks, and AO2 10. The weighting of assessment objectives remains consistent throughout the
levels. Responses are credited for AO1 for the detail and accuracy of the knowledge of the sources, their context and interpretation. Responses are credited for AO2 for
how well the question is addressed, selecting relevant evidence from the sources and the conclusions drawn.
Examiners must use a best fit approach when applying the mark scheme. This means considering both the strengths and the weaknesses of a response, particularly if it is
imbalanced in terms of the two assessment objectives, when deciding which level reflects the overall performance. AO1 and AO2 are closely interlinked. Typically
responses demonstrate both knowledge and understanding and analysis and interpretation of that knowledge in reasonably equal measure. In this way, a total mark of 11
might reflect a balance of 3 (AO1) + 8 (AO2), for example. However, an overly-descriptive response may focus on details from the sources but not draw many valid
conclusions; this would be considered AO1 heavy. Care should be taken when marking such answers, as the lack of AO2 skills should limit the level at which this work can
be rewarded; it should not be possible to achieve a mark of 10 made up of 7 (AO1) + 3 (AO2).
Examples of specific issues or common unbalanced approaches to the question will be identified when finalising the mark scheme in preparation for standardisation.
Details about how to deal with this will be included in the Guidance column for the question.
Level Mark Characteristics of Performance
5 13 – 15 • very good, detailed and accurate knowledge and understanding of classical sources with detailed understanding of the sources’
cultural contexts and possible interpretations (AO1)
• very good analysis and interpretation of a wide range of well-selected evidence (AO2)
• coherent argument with a clear line of reasoning, successful evaluation of sources, and convincing conclusions (AO2)
4 10 – 12 • good, accurate knowledge and understanding of classical sources with clear understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and
possible interpretations (AO1)
• good analysis and interpretation of a wide range of relevant evidence (AO2)
• consistently well-structured argument, consistent evaluation of sources, and sound conclusions (AO2)
3 7–9 • reasonable, mostly accurate, knowledge and understanding of classical sources with reasonable understanding of the sources’
cultural contexts and/or possible interpretations (AO1)
• reasonable analysis and interpretation of a range of relevant evidence (AO2)
• argument is on the whole appropriately structured, reasonable evaluation of sources, and relevant conclusions (AO2)
2 4–6 • basic knowledge and understanding of classical sources, with basic understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible
interpretations (AO1)
• basic analysis and interpretation of some relevant evidence (AO2)
• argument has some structure, some evaluation of sources, and some credible conclusions (AO2)
1 1–3 • limited knowledge and understanding of classical sources with little understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible
interpretations (AO1)
• limited analysis and interpretation of little relevant evidence (AO2)
• some attempt at reasoning, isolated use of sources, and weak conclusions (AO2)
0 0 • no response or no response worthy of credit
J199/22 Mark Scheme June 2022
Question Answer Mark Guidance
11 Why does Encolpius almost fall over and injure 1
himself at the start of the passage? [1] [AO1] Anything related to fear of dogs
Two of:
Golden casket, silver Lares, marble statue of Venus,
runners and trainers suggest it is a large space
Two of:
J199/22 Mark Scheme June 2022
He will spend the night grieving if he can’t find someone
to fight
He won’t be able to sleep unless he fights someone
He is as upset as Achilles when grieving for his friend
15 (b) How does one of these phrases show that the man 1
is rich? [AO2]
Two of:
He is beaten
Attacked if he speaks or stays silent
He will be sued for assault although he was not the
aggressor
He will only have a few teeth left
Beg to be allowed to pass
17 How does Juvenal, by his use language, 4 Allow any valid points which refer to Juvenal’s language
emphasise the dangers of being attacked by [AO1 and give an example from the passage
thieves and vagabonds? 2,
AO2
Make two points. 2]
Guidance on applying the marking grids for the 8-mark detailed response
Two Assessment Objectives are being assessed in this question: AO1 (Demonstrate knowledge and understanding…) and AO2 (Analyse, interpret and evaluate…). The
two Assessment Objectives are equally weighted, and both worth 4 marks. The weighting of assessment objectives remains consistent throughout the levels. Responses
are credited for AO1 for the detail and accuracy of the knowledge of the sources, their context and interpretation. Responses are credited for AO2 for how well the
question is addressed, selecting relevant evidence from the sources and the conclusions drawn.
Examiners must use a best fit approach when applying the mark scheme. This means considering both the strengths and the weaknesses of a response, particularly if it is
imbalanced in terms of the two assessment objectives, when deciding which level reflects the overall performance. AO1 and AO2 are closely interlinked. Typically
responses demonstrate both knowledge and understanding and analysis and interpretation of that knowledge in reasonably equal measure. In this way, a total mark of 6
might reflect a balance of 3 (AO1) + 3 (AO2), for example. However, an overly-descriptive response may focus on details from the sources but not draw many valid
conclusions; this would be considered AO1 heavy. Care should be taken when marking such answers, as the lack of AO2 skills should limit the level at which this work can
be rewarded; it should not be possible to achieve a mark of 7 made up of 6 (AO1) + 1 (AO2).
Examples of specific issues or common unbalanced approaches to the question will be identified when finalising the mark scheme in preparation for standardisation.
Details about how to deal with this will be included in the Guidance column for the question.
Level Mark Characteristics of Performance
4 7–8 • consistently accurate and detailed knowledge and understanding of classical sources, using both those given in assessment and own
wider knowledge (AO1)
shows very good understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and possible interpretations
• a well-argued response to the question which is supported by a range of well-selected evidence (AO2)
includes critical analysis, interpretation and evaluation
3 5–6 • accurate knowledge and understanding of classical sources, using both those given in assessment and own wider knowledge (AO1)
shows good understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible interpretations
J199/22 Mark Scheme June 2022
• a focused response to the question which is supported by a range of evidence (AO2)
includes relevant analysis, interpretation and evaluation
2 3–4 • sound, mostly accurate, knowledge and understanding of classical sources, using both those given in assessment and own wider
knowledge (AO1)
shows some understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible interpretations
• engages with the general topic of the question, and is supported by limited range of evidence (AO2)
includes some analysis, interpretation and evaluation
1 1–2 • limited knowledge and understanding of classical sources; responses may only make use of the sources given in the assessment (AO1)
shows limited understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible interpretations
• little attempt at a very basic explanation of the topic of the question, supported by a few references to evidence (AO2)
includes isolated analysis, interpretation and evaluation
0 0 • No response or no response worthy of credit
J199/22 Mark Scheme June 2022
Guidance on applying the marking grids for the 15-mark extended response
Two Assessment Objectives are being assessed in this question: AO1 (Demonstrate knowledge and understanding…) and AO2 (Analyse, interpret and evaluate…). The
two Assessment Objectives are not equally weighted, as AO1 is worth 5 marks, and AO2 10. The weighting of assessment objectives remains consistent throughout the
levels. Responses are credited for AO1 for the detail and accuracy of the knowledge of the sources, their context and interpretation. Responses are credited for AO2 for
how well the question is addressed, selecting relevant evidence from the sources and the conclusions drawn.
Examiners must use a best fit approach when applying the mark scheme. This means considering both the strengths and the weaknesses of a response, particularly if it is
imbalanced in terms of the two assessment objectives, when deciding which level reflects the overall performance. AO1 and AO2 are closely interlinked. Typically
responses demonstrate both knowledge and understanding and analysis and interpretation of that knowledge in reasonably equal measure. In this way, a total mark of 11
might reflect a balance of 3 (AO1) + 8 (AO2), for example. However, an overly-descriptive response may focus on details from the sources but not draw many valid
conclusions; this would be considered AO1 heavy. Care should be taken when marking such answers, as the lack of AO2 skills should limit the level at which this work can
be rewarded; it should not be possible to achieve a mark of 10 made up of 7 (AO1) + 3 (AO2).
Examples of specific issues or common unbalanced approaches to the question will be identified when finalising the mark scheme in preparation for standardisation.
Details about how to deal with this will be included in the Guidance column for the question.
Level Mark Characteristics of Performance
5 13 – 15 • very good, detailed and accurate knowledge and understanding of classical sources with detailed understanding of the sources’
cultural contexts and possible interpretations (AO1)
• very good analysis and interpretation of a wide range of well-selected evidence (AO2)
• coherent argument with a clear line of reasoning, successful evaluation of sources, and convincing conclusions (AO2)
4 10 – 12 • good, accurate knowledge and understanding of classical sources with clear understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and
possible interpretations (AO1)
• good analysis and interpretation of a wide range of relevant evidence (AO2)
• consistently well-structured argument, consistent evaluation of sources, and sound conclusions (AO2)
3 7–9 • reasonable, mostly accurate, knowledge and understanding of classical sources with reasonable understanding of the sources’
cultural contexts and/or possible interpretations (AO1)
• reasonable analysis and interpretation of a range of relevant evidence (AO2)
• argument is on the whole appropriately structured, reasonable evaluation of sources, and relevant conclusions (AO2)
2 4–6 • basic knowledge and understanding of classical sources, with basic understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible
interpretations (AO1)
• basic analysis and interpretation of some relevant evidence (AO2)
• argument has some structure, some evaluation of sources, and some credible conclusions (AO2)
1 1–3 • limited knowledge and understanding of classical sources with little understanding of the sources’ cultural contexts and/or possible
interpretations (AO1)
• limited analysis and interpretation of little relevant evidence (AO2)
• some attempt at reasoning, isolated use of sources, and weak conclusions (AO2)
0 0 • no response or no response worthy of credit
Need to get in touch?
If you ever have any questions about OCR qualifications or services (including administration, logistics and teaching) please feel free to get in
touch with our customer support centre.
Call us on
01223 553998
ocr.org.uk/qualifications/resource-finder
ocr.org.uk
Twitter/ocrexams
/ocrexams
/company/ocr
/ocrexams
OCR is part of Cambridge University Press & Assessment, a department of the University of Cambridge.
For staff training purposes and as part of our quality assurance programme your call may be recorded or monitored. © OCR
2022 Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations is a Company Limited by Guarantee. Registered in England. Registered office
The Triangle Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8EA.
OCR operates academic and vocational qualifications regulated by Ofqual, Qualifications Wales and CCEA as listed in their
qualifications registers including A Levels, GCSEs, Cambridge Technicals and Cambridge Nationals.
OCR provides resources to help you deliver our qualifications. These resources do not represent any particular teaching method
we expect you to use. We update our resources regularly and aim to make sure content is accurate but please check the OCR
website so that you have the most up-to-date version. OCR cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions in these
resources.
Though we make every effort to check our resources, there may be contradictions between published support and the
specification, so it is important that you always use information in the latest specification. We indicate any specification changes
within the document itself, change the version number and provide a summary of the changes. If you do notice a discrepancy
between the specification and a resource, please contact us.
Whether you already offer OCR qualifications, are new to OCR or are thinking about switching, you can request more
information using our Expression of Interest form.
Please get in touch if you want to discuss the accessibility of resources we offer to support you in delivering our qualifications.