Enhancing MANET Battery Life Strategies
Enhancing MANET Battery Life Strategies
ABSTRACT
1604
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
© Little Lion Scientific
packet forwarding due to internal threats or and beacon signal consumption. This changed
buffering capacity, all of which affect MANET working concept will be simulated using Network
Quality of Service [2]. simulator, and the results will be compared to the
Traditional methods for improving most recent power optimization techniques.
MANET battery performance begins with reducing The article is organized as follows: Section
gearbox power while also reducing energy II summarizes the various existing power
utilization [3]. Power transmission includes packet optimization methods used in MANET thus far;
route selection. Routing selection is based on Section III proposes the working principles of
topological ordering from MANET nodes. To MANET, Discussion of the simulation setup to
address battery power management, various kinds implement the research work, Results and
of MANET protocols [5] are proposed, as well as Discussion in Section IV, and finally conclusion
several new categories of routing protocols [4] [5]. and Feature work in Section V.
Recently, numerous research papers have been
offered to improve the performance of the AODV 2. RESEARCH WORK
protocol, such as AOMDV [7], SQR-AODV [8],
AODV-BR [9], AODV-RD [10], AODV-BR [11], This Section goes into detail about the energy
ATOMDV [12], and AMORLM [13], which are optimization strategy that has been present in
supports for extending battery life. MANET MANET technology since the beginning with
settings are also considered an essential factor in regard to the classification parameter. The related
reducing battery power utilization, such as lowering research work carried out in the division of
MANET overhead to support better power Mobility Awareness-, based on Topology
management; various optimization techniques are Management, Based on the Algorithms, Cluster
based on this goal [6]. Head, and mobility aware Cluster, and
Cluster node selection with LEACH Transmission Range etc.
protocol improves life time span with energy Set of authors carried out research based
distribution [14], Fitness function incorporates in on movement awareness in MANET to optimize
FFAOMDV to reduce power consumed [15], battery power. M. AL-Gabri, L. I. Chunlin, et al.
Artificial Intelligence neural network based [21] discussed LEA-AODV methods, I. Woungang
MANET to optimize MANET energy usage which [22] uses RREQ modification in MANET REQ
supports network efficiency and overall messages, C. Gu and Zhu [23] use Route Energy
performance [16].GPS and long-range technology, Comprehensive Index methods for energy
upon receiving signal strength indicator-based optimization. L. Li, C. Li, and. Yuan [24] employ
(RSSI) from the receiver strength [17], Network Lifetime. S. A. Alghamdi [25] employs
demonstrated long-term MANET utilization. LBMMRE-AOMDV methods of algorithm
EMBOA [18] combines butter fly optimization .Another group of academics focuses on how
approaches with a machine learning methodology topological management can help with MANET
that utilizes less energy to strengthen multipath energy conservation. Rashmi Chaudhry and
rouging. The major challenges in the MANET are Shashikala Tapaswi [26] used an Optimized Power
security attacks, clustering algorithm support to Control technique, Xin Ming Zhang et al. [27]
overcome battery power issues [19]. Nodes in a devised a novel M_AODV protocol, Santhi Sri et
MANET PEO-AODV algorithm [20] provided al. [29] presented a technique termed POR
geographic position monitoring and estimated hop technique for energy optimization, T. et al. [30]
count parameter as aids in overcoming power developed the Secure Optimized Link State
difficulties. Routing Protocol for energy control,. Sridhar, S., et
MANET supports various power al. [31], given the TESAODV protocol, Rao, M.,
management strategies via routing protocol, as well and Singh, N [32] propose the KF-MAC method,
as the most recent techniques of machine learning, which achieves success in QOS parameters but fails
artificial intelligence, and clustering, to optimize to manage the delay.
node battery power and life time. Still, more study Few writers developed a set of methods to
is required to improve the MANET's battery power. help improve the residual energy in MANET.
This research article focuses on the optimization of MUSTHAFA et al. [33] suggested a based on the
power by supporting internal node parameters and SNDA technique, but the outcome generated a
making minor changes to the MANET's operating reliable communication but failed to provide
principles. Internal parameters used to avoid security. Vij et al. [34] employ a Game Theory-
unnecessary packet forwarding, mute ideal node, Based Model for energy optimization. Nobahary et
1605
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
© Little Lion Scientific
al. [35] use the Credit-Based. Veeraiah et al. [36] methods created bad results. More research is
developed the IDSM approach Abirami et al. [37] required to carry out power optimization in
implement the NCV-AODV protocol for MANET MANET. This research study focuses on the
routing, Jim et al. [38] employ an artificial adjustment of internal node parameters and
intelligence technique, and Ponnusamy et al. [39] MANET working principles to accomplish power
proposed an Energy-Efficient Method. R, mesh et optimization in MANET.
al. [40] devised the MSD-SNDT protocol Hasani et
al. [41] proposed a fuzzy-based method. Nobahary 3. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
et al. [42] proposed a game theory-based Hadi et al.
[43] employed AODV .Several authors believe that The following factors of internal node parameters
a cluster head forming-based protocol can support and MANET operating principles change are
MANET node life span. Suresh Kumar, R. [44]', included in the system model established for this
Author employs the ORS methodology T. research work. Internal node parameters include
Venkatesh for MANET [45] invented aspects such as needless packet forwarding, optimal
HAMBOCHLD method, Author. [46] given node muting, and beacon signal utilization.
HAODV cluster head protocol, Raj Kumar, N.P., MANET operating principles have been modified
and Bala [47] apply the EECAO clustering model by including the Sleep and Awake protocols.
,author [48] use the ACO methodology, , Al- 3.1 Internal Node Parameters
Najjar, A.A.M. [49], use PDR and NLT techniques The system model is initially created for
to establish a Uniform Distribution Of Energy. the creation of internal node parameters. Figure 1
Finally, Devika, B., and Sudha, P.N [50] depicts the total architecture and with the intention
established the C-SEWO innovation design of discussed the process of building a cluster and
Hybrid clustering and mobility aware communicating with other nodes,
based technique research could help the MANET Construct the MANET graph MG = M, N,
nodes' battery power. The authors Braik, M., where M = {m1,m2......mm,......mn} represents the
Hammouri, A., et al [51] apply the AGS-ROA total number of MANET nodes, 1< m<= n denotes
mobility aware cluster, Venkatasubramanian, S., the entire number of nodes, and N = ={ l1,l2,.....lv}
[52] implement EPO-FGA method ,Hamza, F. and denotes the edges connecting the nodes. Assume S
Vigila, S.M.C [53] uses cluster HPSO-GA is the source, T is the targeted node, and H is the
technique ,Hamza, F. and Vigila, S.M.C [54] uses cluster head generated by forming a group of nodes
EEMST method, Sivapriya, N., and Mohandas [55] in the region. The cluster head picked is based on
found that the MKMPE approach. Saravanan, R., the residual energy node, life duration, and
Suresh, K., and Arumugam [56] presented an connection connecting to the other nodes.
effective clustering strategy, Bisen, D., Mishra, S.,
and Saurabh, P [57] proposed E-MAVMMF
method Arulprakash, P., Kumar, A.S., and Prakash
[58] proposed EBDC method . Finally,
research is focusing on gearbox range in physical
later supports in order to reduce internal battery
power use. The author Hajek [59] employs
Dynamic and Adjustable methods, Ansari [60] use
ATP-AODV, Balanced The Network's Energy
Consumption, as reported by Z. S. J. and Y. Guo
[61. Nagpal [62] employed MTPR and MHR. The
use of Hello Messages by Neighbor Nodes
advocated by Park [63] ,Energy Efficiency Through
Transmission Power Optimization, as advocated by
Porto and Stojanovic [64] ,W. Wang, X. Liu, Y.
Yao, Y. Pan, Z. Chi, and T. Zhu's [65] Optimal
Transmission Radius.
According to the study of related work, all
of the research work carried out by cornering a
specific domain in the MANET such as routing,
Figure 1 MANET System Model
mobility, clustering, and hybrids approaches
transmission range also achieved success but other
1606
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
© Little Lion Scientific
3.1.1. Selection of Cluster Head 1. Collect the total number of nodes in each
Based on battery power, mobility, link life MANET region
time, and node mobility, one of the nodes in each
region will become the cluster head. A cluster node M MANET SET
will have the highest value of node life duration, R1, R2, R3 ...Rn - Regions where each region RI
connectivity, and battery power and the lowest having set of N number of nodes, among one node
value of node mobility and distance. will be a cluster Head.
Life Time of the Link : For connecting two nodes 2. for each Region Ri, Do follows
and sending packets, the life time of each link is
required. The link is utilized for packet {
transmission [91]. Because of changes in dynamic • Gather all of the nodes' life time, mobility,
topologies, the link in MANET may disconnect, distance, power, and connectivity.
hence the life duration of the link should be • A cluster node will have the highest value of node
determined in advance before picking the route. life time, connectivity, and battery power and the
This could be calculated using an energy model. lowest value of node mobility and distance.
}
Cluster Head selection is based on
(Eq1) collecting the MANET nodes, with device mobility,
Where Eg Energy Dissipation of gth node life time, distance, power, connectivity, and
Node Mobility: Mobility of the node is an forming the cluster head is based on the Algorithm
important factor in MANET, 3.1, then the output of the set of nodes along with
the cluster head will get as a processing output of
the clustering head, as shown in Figure 2 below.
(EQ 2)
|ph| - Set of neighbor nodes, BG relative mobility
Node Distance: Distance between the nodes used
to estimate the link stability, which is evaluated
using the formula
(Eq3)
,
(Eq4)
1607
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
© Little Lion Scientific
hop, resulting in a large number of identical packets energy optimization via the Sleep and Awake
floating in the MANET, consuming more energy. approach and optimum routing path selection. The
Cluster Head is responsible for preventing packets proposed work, FPWP-AODV, is simulated using
from being sent to cluster head nodes more than the NS3 and the results are compared with the
once. existing AODV protocol, which delivers superior
Ideal node mute performance and optimizes battery power. In
When a node is not in the path of particular, this effort will be carried out by
transmission, the cluster head puts it to sleep so that incorporating it into other MANET protocols.
no energy is wasted. When a beacon signal arrives,
the node awakens and checks its condition.
Table 1 Simulation Parameter
Beacon signal usage SIMULATION PARAMETER VALUE
The fundamental objective of using the SET
beacon signal is to synchronies nodes. When the
cluster head nodes are not involved in the MANET Network Interface Wireless
transmission, the cluster head is responsible for Physical Interface
sending the beacon signal. These three wise ideas
could help MANET nodes cut power consumption. Dimension 1500 * 1500Sq.m
Antenna Defined Omni Antenna
4. OUTCOME AND DISCUSSION
Number of nodes 50,100,150,200
4.1 Parameter for simulation Link count 20 -50
The suggested work is implemented in
Network Simulator3 using a high-end system Source Transmission Type Constant Bit
combination of Intel core CPU, 16 GB RAM, and Rate Transmission
Windows 10 operating system. Simulation Set Up
is used to create the simulation results presented in Each Packet size 512 Bytes
table 4.1. Buffer Size 60 Packets
Existing AODV protocol with extra parameters
incorporated in AODV named FPWP-AODV. MAC Layer used 802.11b
Cluster Head formation, and cluster head support Simulation Defined Model Random
are all simulated with NS3 using the simulation
parameters specified in the 1 table and the
simulation parameters defined in table 4.2. Each Propagation model 2 Way Ground
and every parameter is done simulation by varying
the total number of nodes from 50,100,150 and 200. Maximum node speed 30m/s
All the simulation parameter gathered values is Pause Time 30 s
given in the Table 2 and simulation comparative
result in pictorial comparison analysis is given in Number of packet send between 2Packets
the Figure 3From the comparative analysis the the interval
results conclude that FPWP-AODV performance is
better than AODV protocol performance. Time set for Simulation 50 sec, 100 sec ,
5. CONCLUSION AND FEATURE WORK Initial node Energy 240 Joule
The optimization of battery power and
increasing the life time of MANET nodes for Each Node transmission power 0.9 J
packet transmission is an emerging challenge in
MANET. This research article proposes methods
for energy optimization of by forming the cluster Each Node receiving power 0.4J
Head for each region by using the MANET nodes
battery power, mobility, link life time, and node
Sleep Power 0.002J
mobility. A cluster node will have the highest value
of node life duration, connectivity, and battery Changeover Time 0.009s
power and the lowest value of node mobility and
distance. The cluster head is then in charge of
1608
50
Total
200
150
100
Nodes
19.08 19.06 19.01 19.02 AODV Power (J)
ISSN: 1992-8645
50 40 26 12 FPWP-AODV
24 18 12 6 AODV Energy
1609
Consumed
www.jatit.org
20 15 9 5 FPWP-AODV
(J)
© Little Lion Scientific
Parameter
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
90 87 80 75 AODV Cluster
98 92 88 85 FPWP-AODV Accuracy
85 83 80 75 AODV Network
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
85 72 60 50
AODV Cluster Head
lifetime
98 95 90 80
E-ISSN: 1817-3195
FPWP-AODV
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
© Little Lion Scientific
1610
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
© Little Lion Scientific
1611
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
© Little Lion Scientific
IEEE Access 5,pp. 10369- 10381,2017 Networks,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 81,
[Online] https://bit.ly/2IRtQqQ. no. 3, pp. 981–996, 2015, doi:
[16] Jayant Y. Hande, Ritesh Sadiwala , 2023 " 10.1007/s11277-014-2166-4.
Optimization of energy consumption and routing [25] S. A. Alghamdi, (2016)“Load balancing
in MANET using Artificial Neural maximal minimal nodal residual energy ad
Network" J. hoc on-demand multipath distance vector
Integr. Sci. Technol. 2024, 12(1), 718 , 2321- routing protocol (LBMMRE-AOMDV),”
4635 http://pubs.thesciencein.org/jist. Wirel. Network , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1355–
[17] Guruprasath Rengarajan, Nagarajan 1363, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11276-015-
Ramalingam, Kannadhasan Suriyan " 1029-6
Performance [26] R. Chaudhry, S. Tapaswi,(2018) Optimized
enhancement of mobile ad hoc network life time power control and efficient energy
using energy efficient techniques" Bulletin of conservation for topology management of
Electrical Engineering and Informatics Vol. MANET with an adaptive Gabriel graph,
12, No. 5, Comput. Electr. Eng. (2018).
October 2023, pp. 2870~2877 ISSN: 2302-9285, [27] X.M. Zhang, Y. Zhang, F. Yan, A.V.
DOI: 10.11591/eei.v12i5.5184. Vasilakos, (2016)"Interference-based
[18] T. Saravanan, S. Saravanakumar 2023 topology control algorithm for delay-
"Energy efficient optimization algorithms constrained mobile ad hoc networks', IEEE
for MANETIC3 2023, August 03–05, Students Conference on Electrical,
2023, Noida, India DOI: Electronics and Computer Science
10.1145/3607947.3608061 . (SCEECS), 2016.
[28] P. Rahmani, H.H.S. Javadi, H. Bakhshi, M.
[19] C. G. Krishnan, A. H. Nishan, S. Gomathi, Hosseinzadeh,(2018) TCLAB: a new
and G. A. Swaminathan, “Energy and trust topology control protocol in cognitive
management framework for MANET MANETs based on learning automata, J.
using clustering algorithm”, Wireless Netw. Syst. Manage. 26 (2) (2018) 426–
Personal Communications, Vol. 122, No. 2, 462.
pp. 1267-1281, 2022. [29] T.S. Sri, J.R. Prasad, R.K. Kumar, (2018)
[20] Muhannad Tahboush, Mohammad Adawy, SEE: synchronized efficient energy
Osama Aloqaily 2023 " PEO-AODV: calculation for topology maintenance &
Preserving Energy Optimization Based on power saving in ad hoc networks, Arab. J.
Modified AODV Routing Protocol for Sci. Eng. 43 (8) (2018) 4353–4363.
MANET " Int. J. Advance Soft Compu. [30] T. Singh, J. Singh, S. Sharma,(2017) Energy
Appl, Vol. 15, No. 2, July 2023 Print efficient secured routing protocol for
ISSN: 2710-1274, Online ISSN: 2074-8523 MANETs, Wireless Netw. 23 (4) (2017)
. DOI: 10.15849/IJASCA.230720.18. 1001–1009.
[21] M. AL-Gabri, L. I. Chunlin, Y. Zhiyong, A. [31] S. Sridhar, R. Baskaran, R. Anitha, R.
H. N. Hasan., and Z. Xiaoqing, (2012) Sankar,(2017) Proficient and secured
“Improved the nergy of Ad Hoc On- routing in MANET based on trust and
Demand Distance Vector outing rotocol,” energy supported AODV, Proc. Int. J.
IERI Procedia, vol. 2, pp. 355–361, 2012, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 11 (3) (2017) 807–
doi: 10.1016/j.ieri.2012.06.101. 817.
[22] I. Woungang, (2013)“An Ant-Swarm [32] M. Rao, N. Singh,(2018) Energy efficient
Inspired Energy-Efficient Ad Hoc On- QoS aware hierarchical KF-MAC routing
Demand Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad protocol in manet, Wireless Pers. Commun.
Hoc Networks,” pp. 3645–3649, 2013. 101 (2) (2018) 635–648.
[23] C. Gu and . Zhu,(2014) “An nergy-Aware [33] M.M. Musthafa, K. Vanitha, A.M.Z.
Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Rahman, K. Anitha, (2020) An efficient
Networks Based on oute nergy approach to identify a selfish node in
Comprehensive Index,” Wirel. Pers. MANET, in: 2020 International
Commun., vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 1557–1570, Conference on Computer Communication
2014, doi: 10.1007/s11277-014-1946-1. And Informatics (ICCCI, IEEE, 2020,
[24] L. Li, C. Li, and . Yuan, (2015)“An nergy January, pp. 1–3.
Level Based outing rotocol in Ad Hoc
1612
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
© Little Lion Scientific
[34] A. Vij, V. Sharma, P. Nand, (2018) Selfish [44] Venkatesh, T. and Chakravarthi, R., 2022,
node detection using Game Theory in March. An energy-efficient algorithm in
MANET, in: 2018 International MANET using Monarch Butterfly
Conference on Advances in Computing, Optimization and Cluster Head Load
Communication Control and Networking Distribution. In 2022 International
(ICACCCN), IEEE, 2018, pp. 104–109. Conference on Communication, Computing
[35] S. Nobahary, S. Babaie, (2018)A credit- and Internet of Things (IC3IoT) (pp. 1-5).
based method to selfish node detection in IEEE.
mobile ad-hoc network, Appl. Comput. [45] Goyal, A., Sharma, V.K., Kumar, S. and
Syst. 23 (2) (2018) 118–127. Poonia, R.C., 2021. Hybrid aodv: An
[36] N. Veeraiah, B.T. Krishna, (2018)Selfish efficient routing protocol for manet using
node detection IDSM-based approach using mfr and firefly optimization technique.
individual master cluster node, in: 2018 Journal of Interconnection Networks,
2nd International Conference on Inventive 21(01), p.2150004.
Systems and Control (ICISC), IEEE, 2018, [46] Raj Kumar, N.P. and Bala, G.J., 2022. A
pp. 427–431. Cognitive Knowledged Energy-Efficient
[37] K.R. Abirami, M.G. Sumithra,(2019) Path Selection Using Centroid and Ant-
Evaluation of neighbor credit value-based Colony Optimized Hybrid Protocol for
AODV routing algorithms for selfish node WSN-Assisted IoT. Wireless Personal
behavior detection, Cluster Comput. 22 (6) Communications, 124(3), pp.1993-2028.
(2019) 13307–13316. [47] Sahu, M.K. and Patil, S., 2021. Enhanced
[38] L.E. Jim, M.A. Gregory,(2019) Improvised Double Cluster Head Selection using
MANET selfish node detection using Antcolony Optimization for Energy-
artificial Immune system-based decision efficient Routing in Wireless Sensor
tree, in: 2019 29th International Network. SAMRIDDHI: A Journal of
Telecommunication Networks and Physical Sciences, Engineering and
Applications Conference (ITNAC), IEEE, Technology, 13(01), pp.35-41.
2019, pp. 1–6. [48] Al-Najjar, A.A.M., 2021. Optimizing
[39] M. Ponnusamy,(2021)" Detection of selfish MANETs Network Lifetime Using a
nodes through reputation model in mobile Proactive Clustering Algorithm. Turkish
Adhoc network-MANET, "Turkish J. Journal of Computer and Mathematics
Comput. Math. Educat. (TURCOMAT) 12 Education (TURCOMAT), 12(8), pp.143-
(9) (2021) 2404–2410. 155.
[40] V. Ramesh, C.S. Kumar, S. [49] Devika, B. and Sudha, P.N., 2022.
Venkatakrishnan,(2021)" A modified Chronological-Squirrel Earth Worm
Skellam distribution is used in MANETs Optimization for Power Minimization
based on the selfish node detection Using Topology Management in MANET.
technique," Mater. Today Proc. (2021). In Distributed Computing and Optimization
[41] H. Hasani, S. Babaie,(2019) "Selfish node Techniques (pp. 219-229). Springer,
detection in ad hoc networks based on Singapore.
fuzzy logic", Neural Comput. Appl. 31 (10) [50] Braik, M., Hammouri, A., Atwan, J., Al-
(2019) 6079–6090. Betar, M.A. and Awadallah, M.A., 2022.
[42] S. Nobahary, H.G. Garakani, A. White Shark Optimizer: A novel bio-
Khademzadeh, A.M. Rahmani, (2019) inspired meta-heuristic algorithm for global
Selfish node detection based on optimization problems. Knowledge-Based
hierarchical game theory in IoT, EURASIP Systems, 243, p.108457.
J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2019 (1) (2019) [51] Venkatasubramanian, S., 2022. Ridder
1–19. Optimized Cluster Head Selection In
[43] Suresh Kumar, R., Manimegalai, P., Raj, V., Manets Is Fuzzy And Adapted Gear Based
Dhanagopal, R. and Johnson Santhosh, A., On The Steering Panel. NeuroQuantology,
(2022.) Cluster Head Selection and Energy 20(12), p.3830.
Efficient Multicast Routing Protocol-Based [52] Hamza, F. and Vigila, S.M.C., 2023, March.
ptimal Route Selection for Mobile Ad Hoc An Energy-Efficient Cluster Head
Networks. Wireless Communications and Selection in MANETs Using Emperor
Mobile Computing, 2022. Penguin Optimization Fuzzy Genetic
1613
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
29th February 2024. Vol.102. No 4
© Little Lion Scientific
1614