0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Lecture 10

Uploaded by

heenaranga351
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Lecture 10

Uploaded by

heenaranga351
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Hankel Transforms - Lecture 10

1 Introduction
The Fourier transform was used in Cartesian coordinates. Problems with cylindrical geom-
etry need to use cylindrical coordinates. Thus suppose the Fourier transform of a function
f (x, y) which depends on ρ = (x2 + y 2)1/2 . This is;
∞ ∞
1 R dx R dy f (ρ) ei(αx+βy)
F (α, β) = 2π
−∞ −∞

Change this to cylindrical coordinates using x = ρ cos(θ) and y = ρ sin(θ).


∞ 2π
1 R dρ ρ f (ρ) R dθ eiρα cos(θ−θ′)
F (α, β) = 2π
0 0

However the second integral is a representation of the cylindrical Bessel fuction.

R2π ′
dθ eiρα cos(θ−θ ) = 2πJ0 (αρ)
0
R∞
F (α) = dρ ρ f (ρ) J0(αρ)
0

There is an inverse which is demonstrated by the completeness of the Bessel functions which
can be used to expand the delta function. Thus an inverse transformation can be defined.
R∞
f (ρ) = dα α F (α) J0 (αρ)
0

This represents the transform for the 0th order Bessel function. Higher orders can be ob-
tained by increasing the dimension of the Fourier transformations. However, generalize this
result by the delta function expansion and applying this to the integral equation;
R∞
ρ dρ Jm (kρ) Jm (k ′ ρ) = δ(k − k ′ )/k
0
R∞
k dk Jm (kρ) Jm (kρ′ ) = δ(ρ − ρ′ )/ρ
0
R∞
f (α) = ρ dρF (ρ) Jn (αρ)
0
R∞
F (ρ) = α dα F (ρ) Jn (αρ)
0

Substitute F (ρ) into the first equation above, interchange the order of integration and use
orthogonality to develop the delta function.

1
R∞ R∞
f (α) = ρ dρ α′ dα′ Jn (α′ ρ) Jn (αρ) f (α′)
0 0

The above transforms show that a Parseval’s theorem relation exists for the Hankel trans-
forms. They are used for cylindrical geometry problems.
R∞ R∞
α dα g(α)f (α) = ρ dρ G(ρ)F (ρ)
0 0

2 Hankel transformations of the derivative


Suppose that;
R∞
F (α) = ρ dρ f (ρ) Jn(αρ)
0
R∞
f (ρ) = α dα F (α) Jn (αρ)
0

Then write;
R∞
F (α) = ρ dρ f (ρ) Jn(αρ)
0
R∞ df (ρ)
I = ρ dρ J (αρ)
0
dρ n
Integrate by parts. This results in ;
R∞ d(ρ Jn )
I = [ρ df (ρ)Jn (αρ)]∞
0 − dρ f (ρ)
0

Use the recurrence relations to write;

(dρ Jn )
= Jn + αρJn−1 − nJn

Assume that [ρ f (ρ)]∞
0 = 0. The integral then is;

R∞ R∞
I = (n − 1) dρ f Jn − α ρ dρ f Jn−1
0 0

For the 2nd derivative, provided the surface terms vanish is;
R∞ d2 f (ρ) R∞ df (ρ) d(ρ Jn )
L = ρ dρ 2 Jn (αρ) = − dρ
0 dρ 0
dρ dρ

2
z

F
y
a
x

Figure 1: The geometry of a flat, conducting disk of radius a held at a pootnetial F

However, since the Bessel function satisfies the Bessel ode;

d [ρ J ′ (αρ)] = −(α2 − (n/ρ)2 )ρ J (αρ)


n

Integrating each term by parts, Bessel’s equation is obtained for f so the result is just,
−α2 Fn (α).

3 Example - Conducting Disk held at a Potential


The equation for the potential is ∇2 V = 0. In cylindrical coordinates, Figure 1;
2 2
(1/ρ) ∂ [ρ ∂V ] + (1/ρ2 ) ∂ V2 + ∂ V2 = 0
∂ρ ∂ρ ∂θ ∂z
Asume a solution of the form;
P
V = Vn (z, ρ) sin(nθ)
n=0
R2π
Vn (z, ρ) = 1/π dθ V (z, ρ, θ) sin(nθ)
0

This results in the pde for Vn .

3
2
(1/ρ) ∂ [ρ ∂Vn ] − (n2 /ρ2 ) Vn + ∂ V2n = 0
∂ρ ∂ρ ∂z
Apply a Hankel transform;
R∞ 2
ρ dρ Jn (λρ) [(1/ρ) ∂ [ρ ∂Vn ] − (n2 /ρ2 ) Vn + ∂ V2n ] = 0
0
∂ρ ∂ρ ∂z
R∞
V n (λ, z) = ρ dρ Vn Jn (λρ)
0

The solution is symmetric for z → −z, so choose z > 0. Use eigenfunctions for Jn (λρ)
and sin(nθ). This means the functional form for z is e−λz . Choose n = 0 to simplify the
exposition below.
R∞
Vn=0 (ρ, z) = λ dλ A(λ) e−λz J0 (λρ)
0

the boundary conditions are applied in two steps.

Step 1 - z = 0 and ρ < a


R∞
V0 (ρ, 0) = F (ρ) = λ dλ A(λ) J0(λρ)
0

Step 2 - z = 0 and ρ > a

∂V0 | R∞ 2
z=0 = λ dλ A(λ) J0′ (λρ)
∂ρ 0

The above forms a pair of integral equations which must be simultaneously solved.

4 Example - Hydrodynamic Problem


For any closed surface in an fluid having no sources or sinks (divergences), then the increase
(decrease) in mass is due to the massRflowing into (out of) the volume. Let ρ be the density
of the fluid. The total mass is M = ρ dτ . The rate of mass flow is given by;

∂M = R
~ · n̂)ρ dσ
(V
∂t surf ace

In the above, V~ is the fluid velocity, and n̂ is the surface normal. By Gauss’ law

~ · (ρV
~ )dτ = ~ · n̂)ρ dσ
R R
∇ (V
surf ace

4
~ )dτ = − ∂
~ · (ρV
R R
∇ ρ dτ
∂t
This gives the equation of continuity.
∂ρ ~ ~) = 0
+ ∇ · (ρV
∂t
Suppose the rate of change of ρ due to convection on the fluid. A element of fluid at ~r and
~ δt at a time t + δt. Thus;
time t will move to the point, ~r + V

δρ = ρ(r + vδt, t + δt) − ρ(r, t)

Use this to re-write;


∂ρ ~ ·V ~ +V~ · ∇ρ
~ = 0
+ ρ∇
∂t
dρ ~ · ~v = 0
+ ρ∇
dt
~ × V
For a perfect fluid ∇ ~ = 0 and the density is constant. Choose a velocity potential,
~ = −∇φ.
V ~ Thus Laplace’s equation is obtained.

∇2 φ = 0

Suppose the flow of a perfect fluid through a circular aperature ( a screen). The flow satisfies
Laplace’s equation and has the boundary conditions;

V = g(r) r < a and z = 0

∂V = 0 r > a and z = 0
∂z
Apply the Hankel transform J0 (αr)
R∞
Φ(α) = r dr φ J0(αr)
0
R∞
φ(r) = α dα Φ J0 (αr)
0

Using the form of the transformation for the derivatives, note the boundary conditions must
be satisfied;

d2 Φ − α 2 Φ = 0 R∞
F (α) = r dr f (r) |z=0
dz 2 0

This has solution;

5
Φ = A e−αz + B eαz

Choose B = 0 which results in the dual integral equations. Let a ρ = r and α = u/a.
R∞
G(ρ) = u du F (u) e−αz J0 (uρ/a) 0 < ρ < 1
0
R∞
0 = u du F (u) e−αz J0 (uρ/a) ρ > 1
0

5 Dual integral equations


Dual integral equations occur when different boundary conditions need to be applied over
different regions. We have seen how they are developed in the above examples. A general
form for these equations is ;
R∞
dy y α f (y) Jν (xy) = g(x) 0 < x < 1
0
R∞
dy f (y) Jν (xy) = 0 x > 1
0

These equations can be solved in particular cases by change of variable, particularly taking
advantage of any symmetries in the problem. More generally, thay can be solved by a Mellin
transform, which takes the form;
R∞
F (s) = dx f (x) xs−1
0
c+i∞
1
f (s) = 2π1
R
ds F (s) xs
c−i∞

The development is complicated, requiring the result to be found by integration in the com-
plex plane. Because of the detail required, and the scope of this class, this is not pursued
further here. However, if your need to solve such equations your know where to begin.

6 Laplace Transform
It was pointed out that the Fourier transforms provides a solution for the steady-state prob-
lem. However, in many cases we look for transient solutions, so we need a different technique.
R∞
In addition, the Fourier transformation of f (x) requires that dx |f (x)| converge. Thus,
−∞

6
suppose that we have the condition that f (x) = 0 for x < 0, and use;
 −γx 
e f (x) x > 0
f (x) →
0 x<0
In the above γ > 0. Then look at the Fourier transformation.
R∞
F (α) = √1 dx e−γx f (x) e−iαx
2π −∞
R∞
f (x) = √1 dα eγx F (α) eiαx
2π −∞
Use these equations to write;
∞ ∞
1 R dα eγx eiαx R dx′ e−γx′ f (x′ ) e−iαx′
f (x) = 2π
−∞ 0

Define;

p = γ + iα dp = idα
R∞ ′
φ(p) = dx′ f (x′ ) e−px
0
γ+i∞
1
f (x) = 2πi
R
dp φ(p) epx
γ−i∞

The function φ(p) is the Laplace transform of the function f (x). In almost cases the trans-
form will now converge. Problems with convergence and integration have been pushed into
the inverse transform. Evaluation of the inverse requires integration in the complex plane.
However, the inverse transform can be handled in many cases by the convolution theorem.
Thus supppose the integrand in the inverse transform is a product of 2 known Laplace trans-
forms.
γ+i∞
1 R
dp φ(p) Ψ(p)ep x =
2πi γ−i∞
γ+i∞ R∞
1 R
dp φ(p) e px
g(y) e−py
2πi γ−i∞ 0

Or;
γ+i∞
1 R
dp φ(p) Ψ(p)epx =
2πi γ−i∞
∞ γ+i∞
1 R
g(y)
R
dp φ(p) ep(x−y)
2πi 0 γ−i∞

7
Since f (x − y) = 0 if (x − y) < 0, the above is written;
γ+i∞ R∞
1 R
dp φ(p) Ψ(p)epx = dy g(y) f (x − y)
2πi γ−i∞ 0

7 Transformation of a derivative
Consider the transformation;
R∞ dr f −px
φn (p) = dx e
0
dxr
Integration by parts yields;

dr−1 f −px ∞ dr−1 f −px


R ∞
[ p e ] + p dx e
dxr−1 0
0 dxr−1
r−1
φ(r) (p) = −
P n r−n−1
p f (0) + pr φ(p)
n=0

8 Laplace transform of the δ function


Suppose;
R∞
dx δ(x − ǫ) e−px = e−pǫ
0

The inverse transformation is;


γ+i∞
1
δ(x − ǫ) = 2πi
R
dp e(ǫ−x)p
γ−i∞

Let iα = p − γ and idα = dp. Substitution;



1 e−(ǫ−x)γ R dα e−i(ǫ−x)α
δ(x − ǫ) = 2π
−∞

δ(x − ǫ) = e−(ǫ−x)γ δ(x − ǫ) = δ(x − ǫ)

9 Transformation of the step function


Suppose the function;

8
Im p

γ
o
Pole Re p

Figure 2: The contour to evaluate the inverse transformation of the step function

sin(tx)
limt→∞ t = 2πδ(x)

The above is the derivative of the step function, so its integral should be the step function.
R∞ sin(xt)
F (t) = dx x
0

This is an improper integral since it does not converge. However, consider the Laplace trans-
form;
R∞ R∞ R∞ sin(xt)
dt e−pt F (t) = dt e−pt dx x
0 0 0
π . Now apply the inverse transformation.
Interchange the order of integration to obtain, 2p
γ+i∞ pt
1
f (t) = 2πi
R
dp (π/2) ep
γ−i∞

Figure 2 shows the contour for the integration. The value of γ is moved so that the contour
includes the singulatities, in this case at p = 0. For t > 0 close the contour in the negavive
p plane as shown.

The calculus of residues is used to obtain;

1 ] = π/2 t > 0
f (t) = 2πi[(π/2) 2πi

For t < 0 replace p by −p. The result is −π/2 for t < 0. Note that;

dF (t) R∞
= 2πδ(t) = π dx cos(tx)
dt 0

9
Vi R L V(i+1)
I’i Ii
C C

Figure 3: An incremental element of a resistive transmission line

10 Resistive transmission line


Suppose the ith increment of a transmission line appears as in Figure 3. Use Kirchoff’s
circuit laws to write the equations for the voltage and currents which flow and then let the
length of the element δx → 0. Define a capacitance per unit length, inductance per unit
length, and resistance per unit lenght as, c = C/δx, l = L/δx, r = R/δx, respectively.

The voltage equations are;

(Vi+1 − Vi ) = Li dIi + Ii R
dt
Vi = Q′i /C

The current equations are;

dQ′i
= Ii′
dt
Ii+1 = Ii+1

+ Ii

Combine these, use the expressions for the components per unit length, c, l, r, and let the
length of the element δx → 0. This results in the pde for the wave equation previously
obtained. Let J = I in what follows.

∂ 2 J = cl ∂ 2 J + cr ∂J
∂x2 ∂t2 ∂t
Then apply the Laplace transform;
R∞
J (x, p) = dt e−pt J(x, t)
0

10
The initial conditions are set so that J(x, 0) = 0. This removes the surface terms in the
transform of the derivative.

d2 J = cl p2 J + cr p J
dt2
The solution is;

J = Ae−αx + Beαx

Use the step function for the initial conditions;


 
∞ π/2 t > 0
R sin(st)
J(0, t) = ds s =  0 t=0 
0 −π/2 t < 0
As we have seen the Laplace transform of this initial condition is;

J (0, p) = π/2p

Thus from above the transform of the solution takes the form;

J (x, p) = (π/2p)e−αx α2 = cl p2 + cr p

Now let cl = v the signal velocity, and re-arrange the terms in the solution.
√ 2
J (x, p) = (π/2p)e−[ (p +(r/l)p)](x/v)

The inverse transform has the form;


γ+i∞
1
J(x, t) = 2πi
R
dpJ (x, p)ept
γ−i∞

The inverse transformation is accomplished using the convolution theorem. Let p = u − r/2l
and break the integrand into 3 components with inverse as given in the equations below.
√ 2 2
[e u −(r/2l) x/v − e−u x/v ] → A(t) =
 
0 0 < t < x/v
 (r/2l)(x/v) p
I1 ((r/2l) t2 − (x/v)2 ) t > x/v

p
t2 − (x/v)2 
e−u(x/v) → 0 0 < t < x/v
u − (r/2l) 1 t > x/v

11
Figure 4: The solution to the resisttve line for various resistances. The curves all begin at
the time when the signal appears. All parameters are normalized to be unitless

1 → e(r/2l)t
u − (r/2l)
In the above, I1 is the modified bessel function of order 1. Then combining using the convo-
lution theorem.

Rt
J(x, t) = (π/2) dτ e(r/2l)(t−τ ) A(τ ) +
0
(π/2) e−(r/2l)(x/v) Θ(t − x/v)

Θ vanishes for negative argument and equals 1 for postitive argument. The solution is shown
in Figure 4 where all parameters are normalized to unitless dimensions. The curves show
the change in slope as the step function travels through the resistive line and are ploted at
the time point when the signal arrives. The result clearly obeys causality being zero until
the leading edge of the signal travels to the point x in time t at velocity v.

12

You might also like