Evaluation of A-WPS Office
Evaluation of A-WPS Office
#### 1. Introduction
Internal control systems are essential for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of financial reporting,
compliance with laws and regulations, and the efficient and effective operation of an organization. This
evaluation focuses on the five components of internal control as outlined by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO): Control Environment, Risk Assessment,
Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring.
The control environment sets the tone of the organization and influences the control consciousness of
its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control.
**Current State:**
**Leadership and Management Philosophy:** ABC Manufacturing Company has a proactive leadership
team that emphasizes the importance of internal controls and ethical behavior. However, there is a lack
of documented policies and procedures. The leadership has not fully embedded a culture of
accountability and transparency, which is critical for a strong control environment.
**Organizational Structure:** The organizational structure is hierarchical, with clear lines of authority
and responsibility. However, there is limited delegation of authority. The centralized decision-making
process often leads to bottlenecks, slowing down the operational efficiency and responsiveness of the
company.
**Human Resources Policies:** The company conducts regular training on internal controls and ethics.
Nonetheless, the recruitment and retention policies are not robust enough to ensure high-quality
personnel. The training programs do not always address the specific needs of different departments,
leading to a general rather than a targeted approach.
**Recommendations for Improvement:**
**Develop and Document Policies:** Develop and document comprehensive policies and procedures to
guide employees in maintaining effective internal controls. This includes creating a formal code of ethics
and conduct that is communicated to all employees. Regular updates and training sessions on these
policies are essential to keep them relevant and understood.
**Strengthen HR Policies:** Strengthen recruitment and retention policies to attract and retain high-
caliber personnel with a strong understanding of internal controls. Implement competitive
compensation packages, career development programs, and continuous professional development
opportunities tailored to different departmental needs.
Risk assessment involves identifying and analyzing risks that might prevent the organization from
achieving its objectives.
**Current State:**
**Risk Identification:** ABC Manufacturing identifies risks through periodic reviews and assessments.
However, the process is not systematic or integrated across the organization. This leads to gaps in risk
identification and inconsistent approaches to managing identified risks.
**Risk Analysis:** Risks are analyzed qualitatively, but there is no quantitative risk analysis or
prioritization. This can result in an incomplete understanding of the potential impact and likelihood of
risks, making it challenging to allocate resources effectively.
**Recommendations for Improvement:**
**Formalize Risk Assessment Process:** Implement a formal, systematic risk assessment process that
integrates risk identification and analysis across all departments. Use established risk assessment
frameworks such as COSO ERM (Enterprise Risk Management) to provide structure and consistency.
**Combine Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis:** Utilize both qualitative and quantitative methods to
analyze and prioritize risks, ensuring that the most critical risks are addressed first. Conduct scenario
analysis and stress testing to understand potential impacts and develop comprehensive risk mitigation
strategies.
**Establish Risk Management Committee:** Develop a risk management committee to oversee the risk
assessment process and ensure that it is aligned with the company’s strategic objectives. This committee
should include representatives from key departments and have regular meetings to review and update
the risk profile.
Control activities are the actions taken to mitigate risks and achieve objectives.
**Current State:**
**Segregation of Duties:** There is adequate segregation of duties in key processes, but some smaller
departments face challenges due to limited staff. This can lead to situations where incompatible duties
are not properly separated, increasing the risk of errors or fraud.
**Authorization and Approval Procedures:** Transactions are generally authorized and approved
according to established guidelines, although some inconsistencies exist. These inconsistencies can lead
to unauthorized transactions and undermine the effectiveness of controls.
**Documentation:** There is a fair amount of documentation, but it is not always comprehensive or
easily accessible. Incomplete or inaccessible documentation can hinder the effectiveness of internal
controls and make it difficult to conduct audits and reviews.
Information and communication systems enable the organization to capture and exchange the
information needed to conduct, manage, and control its operations.
**Current State:**
**Internal Communication:** Communication within the company is mostly top-down, with limited
feedback mechanisms. This can lead to a lack of engagement and buy-in from employees, as well as
missed opportunities for identifying and addressing control weaknesses.
**External Communication:** There is regular communication with external stakeholders, but the
information shared is often limited and not timely. This can affect the company’s transparency and
reputation, as stakeholders may not have the information they need to make informed decisions.
#### 6. Monitoring
Monitoring involves assessing the quality of internal control performance over time and ensuring that
the controls are working as intended.
**Current State:**
**Ongoing Monitoring:** The company conducts periodic reviews and audits, but these are not always
systematic or documented. This can result in missed opportunities to identify and address control
weaknesses in a timely manner.
**Internal Audit Function:** There is an internal audit function, but it lacks independence and adequate
resources. This can undermine the effectiveness of the audit function and reduce the organization’s
ability to identify and address control deficiencies.
**Strengthen Internal Audit Function:** Strengthen the internal audit function by ensuring its
independence, providing adequate resources, and enhancing the skills of the audit team. Consider
outsourcing or co-sourcing with external audit firms to supplement internal resources and provide
additional expertise.
**Conduct Regular Training:** Conduct regular training for the internal audit team to keep them
updated on the latest auditing standards and techniques. This will help ensure that the audit function
remains effective and capable of identifying and addressing emerging risks and control weaknesses.
### Conclusion
ABC Manufacturing Company's internal control system has several strengths, including a proactive
leadership team, clear organizational structure, and adequate control activities. However, there are
significant areas for improvement, particularly in formalizing policies and procedures, enhancing risk
assessment processes, improving communication channels, and strengthening the internal audit
function. By addressing these recommendations, ABC Manufacturing can further enhance its internal
control system, ensuring greater reliability in financial reporting, compliance with regulations, and
operational efficiency.
### References
- Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). *Internal Control
– Integrated Framework*. Retrieved from [COSO.org](https://www.coso.org/Documents/990025P-
Executive-Summary-final-may20.pdf)
- Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2019). *International Professional Practices Framework*. Retrieved
from [theiia.org](https://www.theiia.org/en/standards/what-are-the-standards/)
- Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2022). *Fraud Examiners Manual*. Retrieved from
[acfe.com](https://www.acfe.com/fraud-manual.aspx)
- AICPA. (2021). *AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide: Internal Control over Financial Reporting*.
Retrieved from [aicpa.org](https://www.aicpa.org)
- Rittenberg, L. E., & Schwieger, B. J. (2015). *Auditing: A Business Risk Approach*. South-Western
Cengage Learning.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Mikes, A. (2012). Managing Risks: A New Framework. *Harvard Business Review*.
Retrieved from [hbr.org](https://hbr.org/2012/06/managing-risks-a-new-framework)
- COSO. (2004). *Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework*. Retrieved from [COSO.org]
(https://www.coso.org/Documents/COSO-ERM-Executive-Summary.pdf)
- Protiviti. (