How To Stop A Blitzkrieg
How To Stop A Blitzkrieg
Session2
How To Stop a Blitzkrieg.
1
What is a Blitzkrieg?
“The term Blitzkrieg gets used, often sloppily, to cover
different though related things.
Literally― lightning war.
As such it could be applied to many campaigns (ex. The 16th
Century campaigns of Frederick the Great; Israel’s 1967
fighting), although the word popularly rose to describe the
so-called German way in warfare in 1939-1941.
Fast battle ground movements by armored and mechanized
infantry units to take the enemy’s army off guard with
advances, regroups, bypasses and advances again.
The ground assault backed by tactical air power (dive
bombers and medium range bombers), gave it a new
touch.*”
German Blitzkrieg
Forces
10
American Inventor J. Walter Christie
The M1928 Design
• 1928, US Army was not interested.
– Christie’s tank features speed and mobility
– Army wanted tanks that primarily supported infantry
• The British bought several Christie models and
incorporated some of the design into their Cruiser Mark III.
• The Soviets bought several in 1931, labeled as tractors, and
shipped without guns.
• The Christie design had:
– Sloping sides to deflect shells
– Inventive suspensions with both springs and torsion bars that
aided in fast cross country travel over open stretches.
11
Christie never was able to sell any quantity of tanks.
He sold prototypes.
Above, 1936 version of the Christie Tank.
12
WW II Soviet T-34 Tank with many of Christie’s designs
13
The T-34 Tank
In Many Ways Impressive, But With Lots of Flaws
• The US Army evaluated the T-34 at Aberdeen in late 1942 and
submitted an extensive report to the Russians.
• They liked the sloping body
• The easily used gun and aiming devices
• The lightweight diesel engines
• That it could climb and maneuver better than comparable US and
British tanks
• Detractions
• Poor quality steel
• Weak, under-designed treads
• Lamentable air filters that resulted in engine failures
• Terrible transmission, probably caused more losses than combat
• Poor welding, leaked water, which shorted the electrical systems
• Poor field radios, no crew communications
• Commanders compartment was a horror and the controls often
require a hammer to get them to move
14
So What Did the Russians Do in 1943?
• They accepted the evaluation at face value.
• But did nothing, just kept turning out quantity.
• But, began to send some mod kits to repair
facilities and did up-grades on a hit-or-miss basis.
• Field cannibalized destroyed tanks for parts.
• They seriously incorporated nine Aberdeen
recommendations into the new model T-34-85.
• After Kursk, they began to phase in the new
model, the T-34-85.
15
Counters to the Tank
• The British, Russians and Germans used mine
fields. They didn’t have to destroy the tank, just
damage its tread.
• Against the last German Blitzkrieg attack at
Kursk, the Russians placed 2400 anti-tank
mines/mile and 2600 anti-personnel mines
per/mile sometimes 15 miles deep.
• Russians used artillery and mortars housed in
prefabricated and portable concrete pill boxes.
16
17
Three Interesting Russian Advantages
• 1. The Russians historically had and moved large
armies and crossed large rivers. Their army had far
greater emphasis on engineer units than did the
Germans.
– They used many pre-fabricated pontoon bridges that
were disassembled and used elsewhere.
• 2. The Russians used a large deception [Maskirivia]
organizations. [Discussion in the next section]
• These [1 and 2] had a well developed mid-level
management and command structure.
• 3. (Non technical) A large network of partisans.
– Early German mistreatment of non-Russian Slavic
populations in the western Soviet Union (Baltic, White
Russian, Ukrainian) came back to haunt them.
– Those still loyal of Communist Government.
18
The Anti-Tank Gun
• All sides developed Anti-Tank guns.
• The Russian Degtyaryov PTRD-4,
single shot, simple and produced
in vast quantities.
22
23
The American Love Affair with the Auto
• The depression notwithstanding millions of Americans GIs
have experience fixing autos, trucks and farm equipment.
26
Billions manufactured You have heard of the
K Ration, meet the
Hershey’s U.S. Army
D Field Ration
The Hershey U.S. ARMY FIELD RATION D was a highly concentrated food intended for
emergency use. One ration consists of three chocolate bars sized to fit in the soldiers’
pockets. Hershey was the first to product this ration. This was for the GI on the front
with no other source of food. It provided a day’s supplies of calories, vitamins and
stimulants, but packaged to taste like blah oatmeal, so it would not be eaten as candy.
The 10 IN 1 RATION-supplied sufficient food for ten soldiers and withstands all climatic
conditions. Chocolate bars of the Ration D type are included.
28
US Rubber Reserve Company (USRRC)
• In 1940 most rubber products used natural
rubber and 90% of it was imported from SE Asia
remaining 10% from South America and Africa.
• Processed rubber doesn’t recycle readily.
• The Administration formed the US Rubber
Reserve Company to: (1) conserve natural rubber
and (2) expand synthetic rubber production.
29
Synthetic Rubber Production
Complex
• The US, Germany and Russia generally used
the same manufacturing processes using
hydrocarbon based raw materials in chemical
factories.
30
US Synthetic Rubber
• B.F. Goodrich Company scientist Waldo Semon developed a new and
cheaper version of synthetic rubber known as Ameripol in 1940.
Ameripol made synthetic rubber production much more cost
effective, helping to meet the country's needs during World War II.
• Building on Ameripol the Government launched a major (and largely
secret) effort to improve synthetic rubber production.
• A large team of chemists from many institutions were involved. The
rubber designated GRS (Government Rubber Styrene), a copolymer
of butadiene and styrene, was the basis for U.S. synthetic rubber
production during World War II.
32
German Synthetic Rubber
• Germany had no ready access to natural rubber, but had an
advanced chemical industry. By 1935, German chemists
synthesized the first of a series of synthetic rubbers known as
Buna rubbers using coal as a basic component.
• These plant were prime AAF/RAF targets.
• Operation Pointblank bombing targeted the 12 major Synthetic
Plants, including:
– Schkopau plant (50K tons/year)
– Hüls synthetic rubber plant near Recklinghausen (30K tons/year)
– Kölnische Gummifäden Fabrik, tire and tube plant at Deutz on the
east bank of the Rhine.
– The Ferrara, Italy, synthetic rubber factory was bombed August 23,
1944.
– Ludwigshafen/ Oppau (15K tons/year,)
– Hanover/ Limmer (reclamation, 20K tons/year,)
– Leverkusen (5K tons/year,).
• A synthetic rubber plant at Auschwitz in Nazi-occupied Poland,
was under construction in March 1944. Sabotaged by slave labors
and never went on line. 33
Russian Synthetic Rubber
• In the Soviet Union, production of
polybutadiene, used a 1910 process developed
by Russian Chemist, Dr. P.Lebedev. The
industrialization process was begun in 1932–33,
using potatoes and limestone as raw materials.
• The Soviet Union had no ready access to natural
rubber which was controlled by the British.
• Thus, by necessity in 1940 the Soviet Union had
the largest synthetic rubber industry in the
world, producing more than 50,000 tons per
year. This increased to as much as 100,000 tons
per year during the war.
34
Poison Gas– the Weapon that Wasn’t
WW I. Chemical warfare was a major
component of the first global war and first
total war of the 20th century. The killing
capacity of gas, however, was limited – only
four percent of combat deaths were caused
by gas.
Gas was unlike most other weapons of the period because eventually it was possible to
develop effective countermeasures, such as gas masks.
In the later stages of the war, as the use of gas increased, its overall effectiveness
diminished.
Post WW I Geneva convention against using but not against producing gas.
WW II. Britain planned to use mustard gas on the landing beaches in the event of an
invasion in 1940. The US considered using gas to support the planned invasion of Japan.
[American Heritage (August/September 1985) P.36 "Why We Didn't Use Poison Gas in
World War II."]
Both sides had chemical weapons but the general fear of retaliation prevented them from
being used. Both sides equipped the troops with better gas masks
35
The WW II Modern Gas Mask
The gas mask that people in the USA
are familiar with was developed in
1944 by the US Army Chemical
Warfare Service.
36
Soviet/German Air Strength
• By 1944 the Germans had moved all but 500
aircraft from the Russian front to face tens of
thousands of Soviet aircraft.
• Stalin continually complained that the Allies
were not doing enough to relieve pressure by
the Germans. The Allies’ 1944-1945
combined land and air campaigns provided
some relief.
37
Prominent Russian Aircraft
In addition to the 150K or so Soviet built MiG, Yak, Ilyushin and other
aircraft, the Soviet Union received [Lend-lease] or impounded.
P-39 5007 P-63 2421 P-40 XXXX Hurricane 2962
P-51 IMP P-47 196 Spitfire 1331 B-24 IMP
A-20 2008 B-25 662 B-29 30 IMP
38
Battlefield Communications
39
In the Ranks–Frontline Communications
Handie-Talkie®/Walkie-Talkie
• The Motorola SCR-300 "Walkie-Talkie" The first US
backpacked radio transmitter /receiverto be widely used,
created by an engineering team in 1940 at the Galvin
Manufacturing Company (fore-runner of Motorola).
– The team consisted of Dan Noble, who conceived of the design
using VHF-FM, Henryk Magnuski who was the principal RF
engineer, Marion Bond, Lloyd Morris, and Bill Vogel.
• Later Motorola also produced the hand-held UHF-AM
SCR-536 radio "Handie-Talkie".
– The terms are often confused today, but the original Walkie-
Talkie referred to the back mounted model, while the Handie-
Talkie was the device which could be held entirely in the hand,
5.5 pounds and a 1 mile range.
– Both devices ran on vacuum tubes and used high voltage dry
cell batteries. Handie-Talkie became a trademark™ of
Motorola, Inc. on May 22, 1951.
40
Noemfoor, Dutch New
Guinea, July 1944. A US
soldier (foreground) uses
SCR-536 “Handie -Talkie" SCR-300-A “Walkie-Talkie a walkie-talkie during the
Battle of Noemfoor.
(Photographer: Allan F.
Anderson.)
Motorola engineer, Donald Mitchell, recognized the strategic value of portable
communications after he observed a National Guard training exercise and saw
how radios installed in vehicles were abandoned in the mud and confusion of
battle.
He returned to the company convinced that military communications had to
follow man to the greatest degree possible and immediately began to engineer
41
a radio that could be carried in the hand.
Conclusion
• Blitzkrieg ultimately did not work.
– It initially worked on small, weak countries
• France had other considerations
– But, the British, Russians and US didn’t stop fighting.
• Ultimately, the Germans experienced a defeat
even worse WW I.
• The Japanese also had initial success, but in the
end had to “Endure the Unendurable” the
occupation of their Home Islands.
42