FIDDLE MRI Technique for Myocardial Infarction
FIDDLE MRI Technique for Myocardial Infarction
Author manuscript
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Author Manuscript
2Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina USA
3Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina USA
4Siemens Medical Solutions, 51 Valley Stream Pkwy, Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA
Abstract
Objective—To introduce and validate a novel flow-independent dark-blood delayed-
enhancement MRI technique (FIDDLE) that depicts hyperenhanced myocardium while
simultaneously suppressing blood-pool signal.
is an in-vivo reference standard for imaging MI, an important limitation is poor delineation
between hyperenhanced myocardium and bright LV cavity blood-pool, which may cause many
infarcts to become invisible.
Methods—A canine model with pathology as the reference standard was used for validation
(n=22). Patients with MI and normal controls were studied to ascertain clinical performance
(n=31).
Results—In canines, FIDDLE was superior to conventional DE-MRI for the detection of MI
with higher sensitivity (96% vs 85%, p=0.002) and accuracy (95% vs 87%, p=0.01) with similar
specificity (92% vs 92%, p=1.0). In infarcts that were identified by both techniques, the entire
length of the endocardial border between infarcted myocardium and adjacent blood-pool was
visualized in 33% for DE-MRI compared with 100% for FIDDLE. There was better agreement for
Author Manuscript
FIDDLE-measured infarct size than for DE-MRI infarct size (95% limits-of-agreement, 2.1%
Correspondence, Raymond J. Kim, MD, Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, DUMC-3934, Durham, NC 27710, (919)
668-3539, (919) 668-3554(FAX), raymond.kim@duke.edu.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our
customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of
the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be
discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Disclosures
Drs. R.J. Kim and R.M. Judd are inventors on a US patent on delayed-enhancement MRI owned by Northwestern University. Dr. R.J.
Kim is an inventor on a US patent on flow independent dark-blood delayed enhancement MRI owned by Duke University. Dr. W.
Rehwald is employed by Siemens Medical Solutions. The other authors report no conflicts.
Kim et al. Page 2
versus 5.5%, p<0.0001). In patients, findings were similar; FIDDLE demonstrated higher accuracy
Author Manuscript
for the diagnosis of MI (100% [95% CI: 89–100%] versus 84% [66–95%], p=0.03).
Conclusions—We introduce and validate a novel MRI technique that improves the
discrimination of the border between infarcted myocardium and adjacent blood-pool. This dark-
blood technique provides superior diagnostic performance than the current in-vivo reference
standard for the imaging diagnosis of MI.
Keywords
myocardial infarction; diagnosis; infarct size; magnetic resonance imaging
INTRODUCTION
Myocardial infarction (MI) is the leading cause of congestive heart failure and death in the
Author Manuscript
industrialized world. Detection of MI is essential, since even small infarcts are associated
with worse prognosis,1 and there are proven therapies that can improve outcome. Even when
the diagnosis of MI is known, assessment of the size, location, and transmural-extent of
infarction is important for patient management decisions, such as whether to undergo
coronary revascularization, resynchronization therapy, or cardioverter-defibrillator
implantation.2
One important limitation of DE-MRI, however, is that infarcted myocardium and the LV
blood-pool often hyperenhance to a similar degree following contrast media administration.3
Hence, infarcted myocardium may be hidden when immediately adjacent to the LV cavity
since there is poor delineation between bright tissue and bright blood-pool. This may explain
why a recent multicenter trial evaluating the performance of DE-MRI demonstrated that up
to 21% of infarcts may be missed in select patient cohorts (i.e. those with non-Q-wave
chronic MI).4
administration (which greatly shortens blood T1) and cannot be used to provide contrast-
enhanced, black-blood images of tissues.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 3
METHODS
Author Manuscript
FIDDLE
The pulse sequence timing diagram and evolution of longitudinal magnetization for different
tissue components are shown in Fig 1.6,7 The primary components are: (1) a preparatory
module that affects the magnetization of myocardium differently than blood, (2) an
inversion-recovery pulse (IR), (3) phase-sensitive reconstruction, and (4) an inversion time
(TI) selected such that blood magnetization is less than tissue.
Because the magnetization of blood is made more negative than normal myocardium (i.e.
blood Mz < myocardial Mz, “Black-Blood Condition”), phase-sensitive reconstruction
renders blood in the cardiac chambers darker than myocardium by remapping the
magnetization to positive-only values. As a result, a precise TI is not needed to make the
blood black—rather, a range of TIs can be used, so long as the magnetization of blood is
Author Manuscript
Pilot Study
Theoretically, any pulse that affects the magnetization of myocardium differently than blood
can be used as the initial preparatory module.8 We chose a magnetization-transfer (MT)
module, and performed a pilot study prior to the main investigation in a canine model. The
pilot study involved two parts: first, empiric data were acquired in-vivo to characterize the
effects of the MT-prep module on the magnetization of normal myocardium, infarcted
myocardium, and blood-pool; and second, the data from these in-vivo experiments were
used to simulate the effects of TI on the signal intensity of these tissues.
For the pilot in-vivo experiments, the animal preparation was the same as for the main study
Author Manuscript
(details below) but performed in a separate cohort of canines. Imaging was performed 15
minutes after intravenous gadoversetamide (0.15mmol/kg) administration using an MT-prep
module (a train of gaussian radiofrequency pulses each 5.12ms in duration) that was
immediately followed by a single-shot steady-state free-precession (SSFP) readout. The
effects of MT-prep train length (1–20 repetitions in steps of 1), flip angle (200°–900° in
steps of 50°), and off-resonance frequency (200–1500Hz in steps of 100Hz) on tissue
magnetization were measured.
Simulations were then performed in MATLAB (MathWorks). The effects of readout pulses,
diffusion, and imperfections in the inversion pulse were assumed to be negligible. The
longitudinal magnetization following the MT-prep and IR-pulse for a given tissue species (a)
as a function of time (t) was expressed as:
Author Manuscript
where M0,a is the equilibrium magnetization of each tissue species, MTeff is the signal
immediately after the MT-prep (based on the canine data), and T1,a is the T1 of the species.
T1 values of 410ms, 630ms, and 440ms for infarct, normal myocardium (myo), and blood,
respectively, were used assuming typical conditions for delayed-enhancement imaging at 3T.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 4
(Mblood(t) ≤ minimum {Mmyo(t), Minfarct(t)}), the signal of normal myocardial tissue (or
infarcted tissue) normalized to equilibrium magnetization was calculated as:
FIDDLEmyo (or infarct)(t) = [Mmyo (or infarct)(t) − Mblood(t)]/M0, myo (or infarct) (2)
infarct sizes and transmurality, we employed a range of occlusion times (40—90 minutes)
followed by reperfusion.10 As a point-of-reference, a 40-minute occlusion in the canine
model leads to a subendocardial infarct that averages 38% transmural.11 The care and
treatment of canines followed the Position of the American Heart Association on Research
Animal Use.12 The protocol was approved by the Duke University Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee.
Following MRI, the heart was removed, and the infarcted region was confirmed using
histochemical staining.13
MRI
MRI was performed at a range of time-points following MI to test if infarct age might affect
Author Manuscript
the performance of FIDDLE. The range was 2 days to 7 months with 14 scanned within the
first 2 weeks, and 8 after two weeks (median 14 weeks). Images were acquired on a 3T
Siemens Verio during ventilated breathholds. DE-MRI and FIDDLE were performed
immediately after one another in random order using matched parameters (e.g. slice
thickness, 7mm; in-plane spatial resolution, 1.2×1.0mm; temporal resolution, 180ms; TR, 2
R-R intervals; breathhold time, 8–10s) 15 minutes after intravenous gadoversetamide
(0.15mmol/kg) administration.
frequency, 800Hz). The TI was manually selected to render blood black and maximize
image contrast between infarcted and normal myocardium. This was performed by selecting
the longest TI (typically 200–280ms) that still resulted in black-blood. A complete short-axis
stack of DE-MRI and FIDDLE images were obtained.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 5
Image Analysis
Author Manuscript
Pathology slices were registered with MR images using myocardial landmarks. Pathology,
FIDDLE, and DE-MRI studies were read separately, blinded to other data. Window and
level for MRI images were preset so that noise was still detectable and infarcted regions
were not over-saturated.14 The presence of MI was determined by visual inspection. Image
were also examined to determine if the entire length of the infarct subendocardial border
could be discriminated from the adjacent blood-pool. Infarct size (%LV mass) was measured
by planimetry of the stack of short-axis pathology and MR images. The transmural-extent of
infarction was expressed as percent myocardial sector area on a slice-by-slice basis.10
Measurements were performed at our core laboratory which undergoes regular audits and
testing for quality assurance (e.g. inter- and intraobserver agreement of infarct size
demonstrates a bias of 1.0% and −0.1%, respectively with a standard deviation of differences
of 2.6% and 0.8%, respectively).
Author Manuscript
Patients
Patients presenting with history of MI were recruited prospectively. The diagnosis of MI was
based on the Universal Definition. Patients <18 years old or with history of multiple infarcts
were excluded. Consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography during
admission for MI with clear culprit infarct-related-artery, and who agreed to participate were
enrolled. The control group consisted of subjects without known coronary disease and with
low probability for developing disease over the next 10 years (lowest Framingham risk
score: 1% for women, 2% for men).15 All participants gave written informed consent, which
was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board.
The MRI protocol was the same as in canines, and the same sequences were used with
Author Manuscript
similar settings. However, to test the generalizability of FIDDLE, half of the patients were
scanned at 3T and half at 1.5T. FIDDLE and DE-MRI were performed using matched
parameters (3T: slice thickness, 6mm; in-plane spatial resolution, 1.7×1.3mm; temporal
resolution, 180ms; TR, 2 R-R intervals. 1.5T: slice thickness, 8mm; in-plane spatial
resolution, 1.9×1.4mm; temporal resolution, 180ms; TR, 2 R-R intervals). FIDDLE
incorporated 2 averages, however, the breathhold time was the same as for DE-MRI (~8–
10sec) since FIDDLE utilized an SSFP readout with twice the k-space lines per segment (59
vs 29). The MT-prep parameters were similar at 3T (train length, 19; flip angle, 500°; offset
frequency, 800Hz) and 1.5T (train length, 19; flip angle, 500°; offset frequency, 600Hz).
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 6
All scans were performed under strict adherence to FDA guidelines for SAR (<4 W/kg
averaged over the whole body for any 15-minute period). The vendor calculated whole body
SAR was collected from the DICOM header.
Statistical Analysis
Author Manuscript
RESULTS
Pilot Study
Author Manuscript
The effects of the MT-prep parameters on in-vivo tissue signal were measured in 8-canines
with 1-week old MI. Increasing train length, increasing flip angle, and decreasing off-
resonance frequency reduced signal intensity for all tissues (Fig 2a). However, the effect was
substantially increased for myocardium compared with blood. Differences were negligible
between normal and infarcted myocardium.
These data were then used to model the signal behavior of FIDDLE (Fig 2b). These
simulations show: (1) blood-pool signal is nulled (i.e. black-blood condition is met) over a
wide range of MT-prep train lengths and inversion times (red arrows); (2) Infarct signal is
high over a wide range, leading to a large difference in signal between infarcted myocardium
and blood, and (3) when blood-pool signal is nulled, longer inversion times lead to increased
signal differences between normal and infarcted myocardium.
Author Manuscript
Canines
The performance of FIDDLE was assessed in 22 canines. Data from all canines surviving
surgery were included. Examples of in-vivo MRI are shown in Fig 3a. In subjects 1–3,
hyperenhanced regions are visible on DE-MRI and appear to match the infarcted regions by
pathology (blue arrows). In subjects 4–5, the exact border between hyperenhanced
myocardium on DE-MRI and the bright LV cavity blood-pool is not always clear. In
contradistinction, for all 5 subjects, hyperenhanced regions are clearly visible on FIDDLE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 7
and the complete borders are easily distinguished from adjacent blood-pool and normal
Author Manuscript
Table 1 summarizes the diagnostic performance of FIDDLE and DE-MRI for the diagnosis
of MI compared to pathology (n=136 slices). Overall, sensitivity and accuracy for FIDDLE
(96% and 95%, respectively) were higher than that for DE-MRI (85% and 87%,
respectively). Specificity was similarly high for both). When only pathology slices with
≤25% transmural infarction were considered (n=87), sensitivity and accuracy remained high
Author Manuscript
for FIDDLE and were again significantly higher than that for DE-MRI (sensitivity: 98% vs
80%; accuracy: 95% vs 85%; p≤0.02 for both). Specificity remained 92% for both.
There was no relationship between infarct age and the diagnostic performance of FIDDLE.
Accuracy was 93% for ≤2-week-old MI and 97% for >2-week-old MI (p=0.35). In infarcts
that were identified by both techniques, the entire length of the endocardial border between
infarcted myocardium and adjacent blood-pool was visualized in 100% for FIDDLE
compared with 33% for DE-MRI. There was no evidence of “slow blood flow” artifacts in
the LV cavity in any of the FIDDLE images.
On a per subject basis, infarct size by FIDDLE (r=0.99) and DE-MRI (r=0.98) were highly
correlated with infarct size by pathology (Fig 4a). Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated that
the level of agreement was high for both comparisons with pathology (Fig 4b). However,
Author Manuscript
DE-MRI showed a small, but significant bias (−1.1%, p=0.001), whereas, FIDDLE showed
no bias (−0.01%, p=0.38). Additionally, 95% limits-of-agreement were larger for DE-MRI
(−3.9%, 1.6%) compared with FIDDLE (−1.1%, 0.9%).
Patients
We enrolled 31 subjects (20 with MI, 11 normal controls), all of whom successfully
completed MRI. No subject was excluded based on poor image quality. The SAR for
FIDDLE was 0.76±0.15W/kg at 1.5T and 1.97±0.27W/kg at 3T, and there were no issues
with exceeding FDA SAR constraints in any patient. Table 2 shows the baseline clinical
characteristics. Among patients with MI, 10 were imaged ≤2-weeks post-MI and 10 were
imaged >2 weeks post-MI (median 24 weeks). In all 20 patients with MI, the infarcted
region on FIDDLE matched the perfusion territory of the infarct-related-artery identified by
Author Manuscript
X-ray coronary angiography. There was no evidence of “slow blood flow” artifacts in the LV
cavity in any of the FIDDLE images.
Fig 5a shows typical images in MI patients in whom both FIDDLE and DE-MRI clearly
depicted infarcted regions. Fig 5b shows images in five patients (3 with MI, 2 controls
without MI) in whom the diagnosis of MI was ambiguous on DE-MRI. With FIDDLE,
patients with MI were easily discriminated from the controls.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 8
Overall, the diagnostic performance in patients was similar to that observed in canines
Author Manuscript
(Table 1), and there were no differences in the findings at 3T (n=15) versus 1.5T (n=16).
Accuracy was higher for FIDDLE than DE-MRI (100% vs 84%). Also there were trends
towards higher sensitivity (100% vs 85%) and higher specificity (100% vs 82%).
The CNR between infarct and normal myocardium was measured in 11 additional patients,
all of whom had a clearly identifiable infarct on DE-MRI. At 1.5T, the mean CNRs for DE-
MRI and FIDDLE were 11.0±5.8 and 9.5±3.5, respectively, reflecting a 14% loss on average
for FIDDLE. At 3T, CNRs were 11.3±4.1 and 10.1±2.6, respectively, representing a 10%
loss on average.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we introduce FIDDLE, a new MRI technique that allows visualization of
Author Manuscript
contrast media administration,9 image intensities are often similar on DE-MRI.3 As a result,
distinguishing hyperenhanced infarcted tissue from bright blood-pool may be difficult unless
the infarct is fully transmural or nearly so. This may explain why the diagnostic performance
of DE-MRI is reduced in some cohorts, such as patients with non-Q-wave MI who are more
likely to have infarcts that are subendocardial.4 Consistent with this notion, in the current
study when only subendocardial infarcts were considered, the sensitivity of DE-MRI
dropped to 80% whereas it remained high for FIDDLE at 98%.
Although this may suggest that the primary advantage of FIDDLE is in patients with small
infarcts, we observed that some infarcts missed by DE-MRI can be relatively large. An
example of such a case is shown in Fig 5b (patient 9), who had an infarct size of 14% of LV
mass as measured by FIDDLE. This demonstrates that an infarct can be extensive in the
Author Manuscript
Even when infarction was identified by DE-MRI, the data indicate that it was rare to
visualize the entire length of the MI endocardial border, in contradistinction to FIDDLE
images for which the entire border was always visualized. Hence, infarct size measurements
were more robust with FIDDLE than with DE-MRI; in comparison to pathology, there was
reduced bias and smaller 95% limits-of-agreement with FIDDLE.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 9
myocardium have been proposed. Some are dependent on the motion of blood in the LV
cavity, either as bulk flow or diffusion.17 These techniques are limited in that “slow blood
flow” artifacts, which are bright and difficult to distinguish from subendocardial infarction,
are likely to occur in patients with ventricular dysfunction. Unlike these approaches,
FIDDLE employs a novel method which is not dependent on the movement of blood. In the
current study, there was no evidence of “slow blood flow” artifacts in any of the FIDDLE
images, including long-axis views. Nonetheless, it should be noted that inhomogeneities in
B1 and B0 may affect the uniformity of dark-blood preparation, particularly at 3T.
Other techniques have been proposed that are not dependent on blood flow. Liu et al.18
describe a technique that combines T2 and T1 weighting to improve the delineation between
infarcted myocardium and ventricular blood-pool. Peel et al.19 describe a method that uses a
dual IR-prepulse to suppress blood-pool signal. Although contrast between infarcted
Author Manuscript
myocardium and blood-pool may be improved with these techniques, the level of blood
suppression may be minimal. Unlike FIDDLE, none of these methods produce black-blood
images. Specifically, these methods result in images in which blood-pool signal is higher
than viable myocardium, hence, an endocardial layer that is partially infarcted may still be
difficult to distinguish from blood-pool.
energy requirements. However, with the sequence described herein, we did not encounter
this problem. There were no issues with exceeding SAR constraints in any of the patients
scanned at 1.5T or 3T.
Kellman et al.16 describe a T2-prep variant of FIDDLE, albeit the order of the T2- and IR-
preparations are reversed. This variant also combines single-shot SSFP readout with motion
correction in order to allow imaging during free-breathing. In a pilot study of 30 patients in
which 1 slice location was imaged per patient with both dark-blood and bright-blood
techniques, they report that the conspicuity of subendocardial fibrosis was improved by
dark-blood imaging. Unfortunately, there was no reference standard for the diagnosis of
fibrosis, hence the diagnostic accuracy of dark-blood imaging was not assessed. In
comparison, the current study is the first to validate dark-blood delayed-enhancement
Author Manuscript
imaging (of any type) directly against a pathology-based reference standard. Additionally,
high diagnostic accuracy was verified in patients, and imaging in patients was performed at
both 1.5T and 3T field strengths to increase the generalizability of the findings.
Recently, our group has compared a T2-prep variant of FIDDLE with MT-prep FIDDLE.8
We observed that T2-prep FIDDLE was more likely to result in artifacts in the left atrial
cavity which appeared to be secondary to non-uniform magnetization preparation,
particularly at 3T. Additionally, T2-prep FIDDLE occasionally resulted in different levels of
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 10
blood-pool suppression in the right versus left-sided cardiac chambers. This is because
Author Manuscript
deoxygenated blood in the right-sided chambers has shorter T2 than the oxygenated blood in
the left-sided chambers. Although these findings suggest potential advantages with MT-prep,
these are only preliminary data; further investigation is needed.
Additionally, setting the inversion time (TI) for FIDDLE is straightforward. One simply
Author Manuscript
examines the image intensity of the blood-pool: if the blood-pool is not black the TI needs to
be reduced, whereas if the blood-pool is black then the TI should be increased to the
maximum value that still results in black-blood. In general, 1–2 scout images are sufficient
to find the optimal TI, but nonetheless this is a limitation that can lengthen scan time. Given
its diagnostic performance and ease of use, FIDDLE has become a core component of our
clinical cardiac MR exam, and we are currently using it daily at both 1.5 and 3T.
There are several implications of our study. Our data suggest that, even in the modern era,
the imaging diagnosis of MI can be difficult, and that new methods may improve decision
making, risk stratification, and management. Moreover, the data suggest that the most
important source of variability in infarct size measurements by DE-MRI is the uncertainty in
identifying the border between infarction and LV blood-pool. The reduced variability
Author Manuscript
associated with FIDDLE is expected to be important in clinical trials that employ infarct size
as a surrogate endpoint. In the current study, patients with known MI were enrolled in order
to validate FIDDLE. In the future, studies in patients with suspected rather than clinically
confirmed MI will be needed. It should be noted that FIDDLE provides a general approach
to improve contrast-enhanced MRI of tissue pathology by separating parenchymal contrast-
enhancement from blood-pool enhancement. Hence, the technique may have broad
applicability in visualizing other pathologies throughout the heart and cardiovascular system
(e.g. atrial fibrosis, aortopathies, etc). This will need to be evaluated in future investigations.
In summary, our results demonstrate that FIDDLE provides superior diagnostic performance
than the current in-vivo reference standard for the imaging diagnosis of MI.
Acknowledgments
Author Manuscript
Sources of Funding
US National Institute of Health grant NIH-NHLBI R01-HL64726 (R.J. Kim). There was no industry support for
this study.
Abbreviations
CNR contrast-to-noise ratio
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 11
IR inversion-recovery
LV left ventricle
T Tesla
TI inversion time
References
1. Hochholzer W, Buettner HJ, Trenk D, Laule K, et al. New definition of myocardial infarction:
impact on long-term mortality. Am J Med. 2008; 121:399–405. [PubMed: 18456036]
2. Kim HW, Farzaneh-Far A, Kim RJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial
infarction: current and emerging applications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 55:1–16. [PubMed:
20117357]
3. Sievers B, Elliott MD, Hurwitz LM, Albert TS, et al. Rapid detection of myocardial infarction by
Author Manuscript
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 12
11. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell
death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation. 1977;
Author Manuscript
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 13
Clinical Perspectives
Author Manuscript
TRANSLATIONAL OUTLOOK
Future studies will further elucidate the role of FIDDLE in identifying infarction,
Author Manuscript
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 14
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Primary components are: (1) preparatory module, (2) inversion recovery pulse, (3) phase-
sensitive reconstruction, and (4) inversion time such that blood magnetization is less than
tissue magnetization (“Black-blood Condition”). Even with inversion times outside the
black-blood condition, blood-pool signal is suppressed compared with DE-MRI, which
improves the conspicuity of infarcted myocardium.
M0=baseline longitudinal magnetization; Mz=blood or tissue magnetization.
Author Manuscript
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 15
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 16
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 17
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 18
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
b. Images from three patients with MI and two controls. In patients 5 and 6, there is possibly
anteroseptal wall hyperenhancement on DE-MRI (red arrows). However, FIDDLE shows no
hyperenhancement and correctly identifies patient 6 as a normal control. In patients 7 and 8,
FIDDLE identifies that patient 8 is a normal control. In patient 9, FIDDLE clearly
demonstrates not only a subendocardial infarct in the anterior wall, but also extension into
the inferoapical wall (blue arrows).
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 19
Table 1
FIDDLE 94/98, 96% (90–99%) 35/38, 92% (79–98%) 129/136, 95% (90–98%)
Patients
DE-MRI 17/20, 85% (62–97%) 9/11, 82% (48–98%) 26/31, 84% (66–95%)
FIDDLE 20/20, 100% (83–100%) 11/11, 100% (72–100%) 31/31, 100% (89–100%)
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.
Kim et al. Page 20
Table 2
Patient Demographics
Author Manuscript
Risk Factors
ECG at MI admission
Author Manuscript
LAD 10 (50%) —
LCx 7 (35%) —
RCA 3 (15%) —
*
Troponin I was used in the diagnosis of acute MI in 4 patients.
CAD, coronary artery disease, IQR, interquartile range; LAD, left anterior descending; LCx, left circumflex; MI, myocardial infarction; RCA, right
coronary artery; yrs, years.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 December 01.