Human Evolution Notes F
Human Evolution Notes F
EXAMINATION GUIDELINES
4
2 1 2
3 5 8
3
8
Changes in structure that characterise human evolution
C C C
A
A A
D
Australopichus africanus Homo habilis Homo Sapiens
Ape-like beings
First apes on the same line of development as humans
First bipedal primates
Australopithecines( Mrs Ples, Taung child, Little foot, Lucy, Australopithecus sediba or karabo)
Homo habilis (Handyman)
Homo erectus
Homo sapiens (modern humans, Florisbad man)
The contribution of African fossils to the understanding of human evolution.
Through the use of biochemical evidence they have argued that the split of the
human lineage (Hominidae) from that of the African apes took place around 5-6
million years ago.
About 3 million years ago, a hominid which was part ape and part human (
Australopithecus africanus, occupied the Gauteng Highveld. This ape man
may have been one of the ancestors of modern man, Homo sapiens.
Australopithecus africanus
Fossils show that one of the earliest known members of the modern human
family, Homo habilis, lived in the Cradle about 2 million years ago.
Homo Habilis
Homo habilis appears to have given rise to Homo erectus and fossils of
Homo erectus have been found at Sterkfontein and Swartkrans sites on the
Cradle. The fossil record also shows that Homo erectus was able to make
use of fire as long as 1.2 million years ago.
Homo erectus
Homo erectus probably lived together with another form of ape man,
Paranthropus robustus, a flatter faced creature with big teeth. Parantropus
robustus also had the ability to make tools.
Paranthropus robustus
By one million years ago, ape men were all extinct.
The study of hominid fossils from sites in Africa thus enables scientists to
understand how these hominids have changed and diversified since then.
4. Fossils found in the Great Rift valley
a. Nutcracker man, ( Paranthropus boisei)
Appear 1.2 to 2.2 milljoen years ago, Fossil found by Mary and Louis Leaky
in 1959 in Tanzania
b. Handy man,( Homo Habilis) ( Earliest species of Homo)
Discovered by Peter Nzube in 1968 in Tanzania
c. Lateoli footprints,
Found by Mary Leaky at Tanzania, 3600 million-years old in 1978
d. Toumai.( Sahelanthropus tchadensis)
Found by Michael Brunet in Chad in 2001
Toumai
5. Scientific interpretation of Nutcracker man, Handy man, Toumai.
Based on the fossil find in the Great Rift valley scientist thought of it as the
cradle.
This is because in 2001, the cranium of a 7 million year old fossil of Toumai
was discovered in the central African country of Chad.
a. The idea that our earliest ancestors had a southern or east African origin
has been overturned.
b. Now scientists believe that the cradle of human kind was Central Africa.
c. How long this idea will last depends on whether an older hominid fossil is
found anywhere else in the world
Fossil Evidence
According to most scientists, humans originated from Africa and moved to other
countries.
This hypothesis is based on fossil evidence and genetic evidence from fossils of Africa
Examples of fossils
Migration of Homo erectus from Africa into the rest of the world
Scientists believe that from East Africa early Humans migrated across the
continent of Africa
They then moved out of the continent through North-East Africa into several
groups.
There are three broad, and complex pathways/migratory patterns:-
o One group travelled along the coast of Arabia, India, South East Asia until
they reach Australia.
o Another group went through Arabia and migrated to Western Europe.
o The third group went through Arabia and gave rise to branches which let to
human population in Northern Europe, Central Asia, India, China and North
and South America.
Genetic evidence for the “out of Africa hypothesis” (DNA from Y chromosome and
mitochondrial DNA)
When DNA is analysed for the purpose of tracing ancestry, a search is made for
mutations since individuals who have the same mutation must share the same common
ancestor These mutations serves as markers of decent
DNA analysis shows that individuals with the same mutation share the same
common ancestor.
The Y-chromosome of males does not undergo crossing-over, i.e. exchange of
genetic information/material/segments, with its X-chromosome.
Therefore most DNA on Y-chromosome are passed on from father to son
without being mixed.
The mutant nucleotides can therefore be traced from son, father, grandfather,
great grandfather and so on.
Male lineage can therefore be traced in every man alive to a common ancestor
who lived in East Africa about 60 000 years ago.
Genetic evidence for the ‘out of Africa’ hypothesis (DNA from Y chromosome and
mitochondrial DNA)
Mutant genes from Mitochondrial DNA
Apart from DNA in the nucleus, DNA
also occurs in the mitochondria as
mitochondrial DNA (mt DNA)
• mtDNA of the sperm cell does not fuse with
mtDNA of the egg cell
• mtDNA is therefore handed down from
mother to child
• By following mutations in mtDNA, we can trace
our female line of descent.
• Using mutant nucleotides of Y-chromosomes
• Spencer Wells and his colleagues have traced
The inheritance of mitochondrial DNA
lineage of everyman alive to a common
ancestor who lived in East Africa about 60 000 years ago.
• Analysis of mitochondrial DNA leads to ancestral female who lived in East Africa
about 150 000 years ago.
1. The following two questions refer to the characteristics of Homo sapiens and other
primates.
1.1.1 State TEN structural characteristics of Homo sapiens that are similar
to other primates. (9)
1.1.2 Tabulate FOUR structural differences between the skull of
Homo sapiens and that of other primates. (11)
(20)
2. Study the diagram below and answer the questions that follow:
3.1.2 From the list above mention the fossils discovered at the
Great Rift Valley. (3)
3.1.3 Discuss the interpretation of these fossils. (10)
(30)
5
3
6
4
5. A comparison of the anatomical features of organisms has helped scientists to
propose evolutionary relationships.
Skull
Homo
Australopithecus
foramen
magnum
Chimpanzee
5.1.1 Tabulate FOUR observable differences between the side view of the
skulls of Homo and the chimpanzee. (4)
5.1.3 Give ONE observable reason for your answer to QUESTION 4.1.2. (1)
(10)
Total [80]
Memorandum Worksheet : Human Evolution
1.1.1 - Upright posture
- Long upper arms
- Freely rotating arms
- Elbow joints allowing rotation of forearm
- Rotate hands at least 180º
- Flat nails instead of claws/bare finger tips
- Opposable thumbs which work in opposite direction to their fingers
- Large brains/skulls compared to their body mass
- Eyes in front/binocular vision/stereoscopic vision
- Eyes with cones/colour vision
- Sexual dimorphism/distinct differences between male and female
- Olfactory brain centres reduced/reduced sense of smell
- Parts of the brain that process information from the hands and eyes
are enlarged
- Two mammary glands only any (9)
3.1.2
Homo sapiens Other primates
1. Larger cranium/brain 1. Smaller cranium /brain
2. Flat face/ 2. Face sloping/
Forehead slope less backwards Foreheads slope much backwards
3. Foramen magnum 3. Foramen magnum at
forward/bottom of the skull the back of the skull
4. Brow ridges are not as pronounced 4. Brow ridges pronounced
5. Smaller canines 5. Larger canines
6. Smaller spaces between the teeth 6. Larger spaces between the teeth
7. Jaws with teeth on a 7. Jaws with teeth in a
gentle/round curve rectangular/U shape
8. Less protruding jaws 8. More protruding jaws/prognathous
9. Lower jaw has a well developed chin 9. Lower jaw has poorly developed chin
any 5 x 2 = 10+ 1 for table) (11)
5.
Homo sapiens Other primates
1. Larger cranium/brain 1. Smaller cranium /brain
2. Flat face/ 2. Face sloping/
3. Foramen magnum 3. Foramen magnum at
forward/bottom of the skull the back of the skull
4. Brow ridges are not as 4. Brow ridges pronounced
pronounced
5. Smaller canines 5. Larger canines
7. Jaws with teeth on a 7. Jaws with teeth in a
gentle/round curve rectangular/U shape
8. Less protruding jaws 8. More protruding jaws/prognathous
Any 4 x2 (8)
6.1.2 Australopithecus (1)
6.1.3 Foramen Magnum more towards the middle (1)
(10)
[80]