Week 7
Week 7
The teacher and the students will prepare the room for the panel discussion
of the research proposal defense.
2. Presentation There will be two groups of presenters for every period. Below
is the schedule of the title defense presentation:
1. Research Title
2. Background of the Study
3. Type of Quantitative Research
4. Research Questions: (List down)
5. Data Gathering Procedure (Suitable Analytic Method)
a. How are you going to answer your research questions?
6. Instrumentation (Researchers use for a measurement device)
a. How will you collect your data?
7. Research Locale:
a. Where is the setting of your study?
8. Subjects (Participants)
a. Who will be your subject(s)?
9. Sampling Technique:
a. How will you select your subject(s)?
Students will discuss and explain the research title that they
CALOOCAN HIGH SCHOOL
SENIOR HIGH Department
10th Ave., Grace Park, Caloocan City
1st Semester, S.Y. 2024 – 2025
Subject: PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
1. The paper must be stated in a future tense to explain how you will do
your research since this is still a title proposal.
2. Details of the presentation and paper must be the same.
3. First page must be the title page. Follow the format.
4. The paper margin should be set 1 inch in each side.
Font Style: Times New Roman
Font Size: 12
Paper Size: 8.5 x 11 (short bond paper)
Spacing: Doubled
Paragraph: Justified
5. Three (3) copies of the paper should be submitted a day before
scheduled date and time of the title defense.
6. Paper should be stapled or clipped. Do not use folder.
3. Generalization Teacher panels will ask some questions in regards with the
proposal.
4. Evaluation Attached to this learning plan is the rubric that will be used to evaluate the
title proposal defense presentation.
5. Assignment Students will get ready for the deliberation of comments, suggestions,
corrections of the panel, with the research adviser.
*For the instance of 12 1HE and 3HUMSS, deliberation will be done on Friday.
V. REMARKS This DLL serves as Day 1 and Day 2 planning for each class meetings.
VI. REFLECTION
No. of Learners
A. No. of learners who earned
80% in the evaluation
B. No. of learners who require
additional activities for
remediation who scored
below 80%
C. Did the remedial lessons
work? No. of learners
who have caught up the
lesson
D. No. of learners who continue
to require remediation