0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views12 pages

Attribute R&Requipo3

Uploaded by

mary
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views12 pages

Attribute R&Requipo3

Uploaded by

mary
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Instructions

Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness


Instructions:
1) The following spreadsheet is used to calculate an Attribute GR&R Effectiveness, in which up to
100 samples can be evaluated, using 2 or 3 operators.
2) In the Data Entry worksheet fill in the appropriate information in the Scoring Report section and
enter the type of Attributes you are evaluating in the Attribute Legend section. YOU MUST ENTER
THE INFORMATION IN THE ATTRIBUTE LEGEND SECTION OR THE SPREADSHEET
WILL NOT WORK. The attributes can be either alpha or numeric, e.g. Yes, No; pass, fail;
go, stop; or 1, 2. You must be consistent throughout the form and spell properly.
3) If you or an expert has selected samples to be evaluated and you know what attributes these
samples are, enter this information in the Attribute sample column. This will enable you to determine
how well each operator can evaluate a set of samples against a known standard. You do not
need to enter information in this column for the spreadsheet to work although you will
not be able to assess the operators against known standards.
4) You do not have to specify how many operators or the # of samples that you will be evaluating
during the test. Simply enter the data into the spreadsheet under the specific operator. Remember
the attributes must be spelled properly or the spreadsheet will not analyze the data correctly.
5) To print a copy of the report click on the Print Report icon.
6) To delete the data in the spreadsheet, click on the Delete Data icon.
7) To delete all and begin a new test, click on the Delete All icon
8) To see a Demo of the Attribute GR&R Effectiveness spreadsheet, click on the Demo icon.
Move around the spread sheet to see the data. When you are finished click the Delete All icon
to delete all data to begin entering your own data.

The 95% UCL and 95% LCL represent the 95% upper and lower confidence limits on the
binomial distribution. The Calculated Score is the basic computation reported on the report
page for % Appraiser and % Score vs Attribute. The 95% confidence interval represents
the range within which the true Calculated Score lies given the uncertainty associated with
limited sample sizes. As sample size increases (in this case, Total Inspected) the
confidence interval will get smaller and smaller which indicates more reliable estimates of
the true percentages. In the case of the Demo data, the true Calculated score for Operator 1
Instructions
could be as low as 76.8% given that only 14 samples inspected, even though there was a 100%
Appraiser value calculated. Also, even though Operator 2 had a lower score, Operators 1 and 3
cannot be distinguished from Operator 2 because the calculated score of #2 (78.6%) lies within
the confidence limits for Operators 1 and 3.

With a worksheet limitation of 100 samples, at best a lower 95% limit of 96.4% can be calculated.
Thus, we would have to say that an inspector could be as bad as 96% efficient, even though he/she
missed no calls.

Sample Size 100 < Try out different combinations of number of samples and number of matches
# Matches 100 < to see the effects of sample size. In this case, a sample size of 30 with
95% UCL 100.0% < one non-match will yield a 17% confidence interval. In order to get reasonable
Calculated Score 100.0% < reliability in estimates of efficiency, large sample sizes will be required.
95% LCL 96.4%
Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness Data Entry

SCORING REPORT
DATE: 3/10/1996
Attribute Legend5 (used in computations) NAME: Equipo 3
1 pass PRODUCT: M&Ms All operators
2 fail SITE: GB training agree within and All Operators
between each agree with
Other standard
Known Population Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3 Y/N Y/N
Sample # Attribute Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Agree Agree
1 PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS N N
2 FAIL PASS PASS FAIL FAIL N N
3 FAIL PASS PASS FAIL FAIL N N
4 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS Y N
5 FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS N N
6 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS Y N
7 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL Y Y
8 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS Y Y
9 PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS N N
10 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS Y N
11 FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS N N
12 FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL N N
13 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL Y Y
14 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS Y N
15 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS Y N
16 PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL N N
17 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS Y Y
18 PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS N N
19 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS Y N
20 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS Y Y
21 PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS N N
22 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL Y Y
23 FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS N N
24 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL Y Y
25 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL Y Y
26 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL Y Y
27 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS Y Y
28 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS Y Y
29 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS Y Y
30 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL Y Y
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
% APPRAISER SCORE(1) -> 83.33% 80.00% 0%
% SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE(2) -> 50.00% 56.67% 0.00%

SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) -> 63.33%


SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE (4) -> 43.33%

Note:
(1) Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials
(2) Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
(3) All operators agreed within and between themselves
(4) All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
(5) Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection
Report
Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness
SCORING REPORT
DATE: 3/10/1996
Attribute Legend NAME: Equipo 3
1 pass PRODUCT: M&Ms All operators
2 fail BUSINESS: GB training agree within and All Operators
between each agree with
Other standard
Known Population Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3 Y/N Y/N
Sample # Attribute Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Agree Agree
1 PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS - - N N
2 FAIL PASS PASS FAIL FAIL - - N N
3 FAIL PASS PASS FAIL FAIL - - N N
4 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y N
5 FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS - - N N
6 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y N
7 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL - - Y Y
8 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y Y
9 PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS - - N N
10 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y N
11 FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS - - N N
12 FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL - - N N
13 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL - - Y Y
14 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y N
15 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y N
16 PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL - - N N
17 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y Y
18 PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS - - N N
19 FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y N
20 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y Y
21 PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS - - N N
22 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL - - Y Y
23 FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS - - N N
24 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL - - Y Y
25 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL - - Y Y
26 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL - - Y Y
27 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y Y
28 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y Y
29 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS - - Y Y
30 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL - - Y Y
31 - - - - - - -
32 - - - - - - -
33 - - - - - - -
34 - - - - - - -
35 - - - - - - -
36 - - - - - - -
37 - - - - - - -
38 - - - - - - -
39 - - - - - - -
40 - - - - - - -
41 - - - - - - -
42 - - - - - - -
43 - - - - - - -
44 - - - - - - -
45 - - - - - - -
46 - - - - - - -
47 - - - - - - -
48 - - - - - - -
49 - - - - - - -
50 - - - - - - -
51 - - - - - - -
52 - - - - - - -
53 - - - - - - -
54 - - - - - - -
55 - - - - - - -
56 - - - - - - -
57 - - - - - - -
58 - - - - - - -
59 - - - - - - -
60 - - - - - - -
61 - - - - - - -
62 - - - - - - -
63 - - - - - - -
64 - - - - - - -
65 - - - - - - -
66 - - - - - - -
67 - - - - - - -
68 - - - - - - -
69 - - - - - - -
70 - - - - - - -
71 - - - - - - -
72 - - - - - - -
73 - - - - - - -
74 - - - - - - -
75 - - - - - - -
76 - - - - - - -
77 - - - - - - -
78 - - - - - - -
79 - - - - - - -
80 - - - - - - -
81 - - - - - - -
82 - - - - - - -
83 - - - - - - -
84 - - - - - - -
85 - - - - - - -
86 - - - - - - -
87 - - - - - - -
88 - - - - - - -
89 - - - - - - -
90 - - - - - - -
91 - - - - - - -
92 - - - - - - -
93 - - - - - - -
94 - - - - - - -
95 - - - - - - -
96 - - - - - - -
97 - - - - - - -
98 - - - - - - -
99 - - - - - - -
100 - - - - - - -

% APPRAISER SCORE -> (1)


83.33% 80.00% 0%
% SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE -> (2)
50.00% 56.67% 0.00%

SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) -> 63.33%


SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE(4) -> 43.33%

Note:
(1) Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials
(2) Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
(3) All operators agreed within and between themselves
(4) All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
(5) Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection
Statistical Report - Attribute Gage R&R Study
DATE: 3/10/1996
NAME: Equipo 3
PRODUCT: M&Ms
BUSINESS: GB training

% Appraiser1 %Score vs Attribute2


Source Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3 Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3
Total Inspected 30 30 0 30 30 0
# Matched 25 24 0 15 17 0
False Negative (operator biased toward rejection) 0 0 0
False Positive (operator biased toward acceptance) 10 7 0
Mixed 5 6 0
95% UCL 94.4% 92.3% #DIV/0! 68.7% 74.5% #DIV/0!
Calculated Score 83.3% 80.0% #DIV/0! 50.0% 56.7% #DIV/0!
95% LCL 65.3% 61.4% #DIV/0! 31.3% 37.4% #DIV/0!

Screen % Effective Score3 Screen % Effective Score vs Attribute4


Total Inspected 30 30
# in Agreement 19 13
95% UCL 80.1% 62.6%
Calculated Score 63.3% 43.3%
95% LCL 43.9% 25.5%

% Appraiser 95% LCL % Score vs Appraiser 95% LCL


110.0% 110.0%
% Efficiency
% Efficiency

100.0% 100.0%
90.0% 90.0%
80.0% 80.0%
70.0% 70.0%
60.0% 60.0%
50.0% 50.0%
40.0% 40.0%
30.0% 30.0%
20.0% 20.0%
10.0% 10.0%
0.0% 0.0%
Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3 Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3

Notes
(1) Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials
(2) Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
(3) All operators agreed within and between themselves
(4) All operators agreed within & between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
Calculations

Known Population Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3


Sample # Attribute Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Try #1
1 1 1 1 2 1
2 2 1 1 2 2
3 2 1 1 2 2
4 2 1 1 1 1
5 2 2 1 1 1
6 2 1 1 1 1
7 2 2 2 2 2
8 1 1 1 1 1
9 1 2 1 1 1
10 2 1 1 1 1
11 2 2 1 2 1
12 2 1 1 1 2
13 2 2 2 2 2
14 2 1 1 1 1
15 2 1 1 1 1
16 1 2 1 1 2
17 1 1 1 1 1
18 1 2 1 1 1
19 2 1 1 1 1
20 1 1 1 1 1
21 1 1 1 2 1
22 2 2 2 2 2
23 2 1 1 2 1
24 2 2 2 2 2
25 2 2 2 2 2
26 2 2 2 2 2
27 1 1 1 1 1
28 1 1 1 1 1
29 1 1 1 1 1
30 2 2 2 2 2
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

Page 7
Calculations

41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90

Page 8
Calculations

91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
% Appraiser Score 83.33% 80.00%

Page 9
Calculations

Operator #3 Y/N Y/N


Try #2 Agree Agree
FALSE FALSE
FALSE FALSE
FALSE FALSE
TRUE FALSE
FALSE FALSE
TRUE FALSE
TRUE TRUE
TRUE TRUE
FALSE FALSE
TRUE FALSE
FALSE FALSE
FALSE FALSE
TRUE TRUE
TRUE FALSE
TRUE FALSE
FALSE FALSE
TRUE TRUE
FALSE FALSE
TRUE FALSE
TRUE TRUE
FALSE FALSE
TRUE TRUE
FALSE FALSE
TRUE TRUE
TRUE TRUE
TRUE TRUE
TRUE TRUE
TRUE TRUE
TRUE TRUE
TRUE TRUE

Page 10
Calculations

Page 11
Calculations

Page 12

You might also like