PSP Module 2
PSP Module 2
Gantt charts can also be used for the monitoring phase of the project
by indicating the current / actual project progress using the percent
complete shadings against the planned and a vertical “TODAY” line
or the “DATA DATE” to denote the current monitoring period.
Due to the simplicity associated with the Gantt chart the reports from
projects managed using the network schedule also provide an option
for generating reports in the form of bar chart.
CRITICAL PATH METHOD.
Advantages:
Clearly identifies the set of activities that control the overall
project duration.
Determines the minimum time for project completion.
Identifies the activities that are critical and thus cannot be
slipped or delayed.
Calculated the available float for non-critical activities.
Once CPM model is developed “what-if” scenarios can be
evaluated.
Allows complex, fast-track projects be monitored and
controlled.
With the use of software the CPM can be resource loaded
and leveled.
CRITICAL PATH METHOD.
Disadvantages:
This method could be stated to be only as good as the effort put
forth to properly model the plan.
The Program Evaluation Review Technique uses a weighted average duration estimate
to calculate the activity durations and hence able to accommodate the uncertainty or
the probability associated with the activity durations.
PERT was effectively used for first time projects which have no past performance or
historic data.
PERT DUR = (O + 4M + P) / 6
S.D = (P – O) / 6
VARIANCE = (S.D) 2
Duration Types.
Optimistic time (O): It is the minimum possible time required to accomplish a task,
assuming everything proceeds better than is normally expected.
Pessimistic time (P): It is the maximum possible time required to accomplish a task,
assuming everything goes wrong or in the worst possible manner.
Most likely time (M): It is the best estimate of the time required to accomplish a task,
assuming everything proceeds as normal.
Having arrived at the above three possible durations for any activity the PERT duration
is estimated using the Beta distribution assigning into a normal distribution.
GERT – Graphical Evaluation Review Technique.
GERT is referred as a stochastic network analysis technique used in project
management that allows for conditional and the probabilistic treatment of
the logical relationships between the activities.
The key objective of the GERT is to evaluate the schedule using the network
logic which allow the creation of loops between the nodes.
A loop is said to be formed within a network schedule when a set of tasks /
activities require to be repeated based on a set rule or a condition.
Failed
ADM – ARROW DIAGRAMMING METHOD:
Network rules:
Set
N Pump
R
IJ = N - R
ADM – ARROW DIAGRAMMING METHOD:
IJ = A-B IJ = B - C IJ = C - D
ADM – ARROW DIAGRAMMING METHOD:
A Typical Network
5
C H
F G M
3 6 9 11
D 10 N
7 E
ADM – CALCULATIONS.
NODES ACTIVITY Duration (Days)
3-5 C 3
3-6 F 4
3-7 D 2
5-9 H 6
6-9 G 8
7 - 10 E 12
9 - 11 M 8
10 - 11 N 4
Install Inspect
N Printer
R Printer
T
IJ = N - R IJ = R - T
Dummy
IJ = R - S
Hire Train
O Operator
S Operator
U
IJ = O - S IJ = S - U
PDM – PRECEDENCE DIAGRAMMING METHOD.
PDM Network rules:
Activities are represented by boxes or nodes that are assigned all the
properties of the activity they represent.
Precedence are shown by arrows that have both Direction and Time
properties.
ES = Early Start
ES OD EF
EF = Early Finish
LS = Late Start
Activity Description LF = Late Finish
OD = Original Duration
TF = Total Float
LS TF LF
Pour Set
Foundation Pump
FORWARD PASSING
EF = ES + OD – 1
TYPICAL CALCULATIONS
IN A NETWORK ANALYSIS BACKWARD PASSING
LS = LF – OD + 1
PRECEDENCE RELATIONSHIPS
Finish To Start (FS) – The “from” Activity A must be finished
before the “to” activity B can start.
Task A Task B
Start To Start (SS) – Tasks A and B may start at the same time, but
the successor (B) can not start until the predecessor (A) begins.
Task A Task B
PRECEDENCE RELATIONSHIPS
Finish To Finish (FF) – Tasks A and B may end at the same time, but
the successor (B) cannot finish until the predecessor (A) finishes.
Task A Task B
Start To Finish (SF) – Tasks A must start before Task B can finish.
Seldom used (not accepted by scheduling software)
Task A Task B
PATH CONVERGENCE
In mathematical analysis, the tendency of parallel paths of approximately
equal duration to delay the completion of the milestone where they meet.
While forward passing the ES of the successor would be based on the
maximum early finish among the predecessors.
While backward passing the LF of all the successors would be same and
based on the LS of the common successor.
It is characterized by the schedule activity with more than predecessor
activity.
B
PATH DIVERGENCE
Extending or generating parallel schedule network paths from the
same node in a project schedule network diagram.
While forward passing the ES of the all the successors would be same
and based on the finish of the common predecessor.
While backward passing the LF of the common predecessor would be
based on the minimum LS among the successors.
It is characterized by the schedule activity with more than successor
activity.
C
B
ADM Vs. PDM
ADM PDM
A C
1 3 5 A C
B D
2 4 6 B D
ADM PDM
4 B
B
A C
1 3 5 = A C
D
6 D
5 D 6 17 F 18
10
5 2 6 17 2 18
5 D 6 5 F 8
-2
5 2 6 5 4 8
Finish To Start with Lag (FS7) – The construction of Building
Foundation must be finished Seven days before Construction of the
Building Exterior and Structure can start.
Construct Construction of
Building FS 7 Building Exterior
Foundation and Structure.
SS - 5
CPM – LOGIC RELATIONSHIPS
4 Day Lag
Start to Finish (SF)
SF 4
A B
CPM – LOGIC RELATIONSHIPS
FF 4
Finish to Finish (FF)
A B
SS 4
A B
TYPICAL LOGIC ERRORS & NETWORK PROBLEMS:
Incorrect Logic.
Redundant Logic.
Logic Loops.
Open / Dangling Ends.
1. INCORRECT LOGIC.
The Activity logic included in the network schedule must be
correct. If the logic is not correct, the network schedule will not
accurately represent the way the construction would be actually
carried out.
For example, the selection of the color of the interior architectural
paint by the architect should not restrain the construction of the
roof in the network though they may fall in the same time period
as they are not logically related.
Incorrect activity logic reduces the effectiveness of the network
schedule as a tool for planning and management.
2. REDUNDANT LOGIC.
It is not an incorrect relationship based on the logic. But this
should be avoided while creating a network diagram. Redundant
logic tends to unnecessarily complicate the network by creating
more parallel paths in the network and also creates the
modifications and the analysis very difficult.
3. LOGIC LOOPS.
As noted previously, activity networks used for construction
normally have a unidirectional flow from the start to the completion
of the project.
Logic loops violate this basic premise and result in an
unresolvable logic.
These logic loops not only result in an impossible network but also
prevent the schedule from being calculated using the forward and
backward pass technique.
4. OPEN / DANGLING ENDS.
It is a requirement that any network diagram should only have a
single start and single end Activity.
If multiple activities are required to be started or ended together
then to create a Start and Finish Milestone.
Any open ended activities in the middle of the network should be
suitable tied to the start and finish milestones.
HAMMOCK ACTIVITY
• Hammocks are Summary level activities and attributes:
– Spans two activities that may be separated by a number of other
activities
– Used to measure elapsed time between covered activities
Hammock Activity
A B
C D F
E
FORWARD PASS EXAMPLE
ESA = EFP + 1
6 D 9 EFA = ESA + DA - 1
4
10 + 1 = 11
8 E 8 11 G 14
1 4
4 F 10
7
BACKWARD PASS EXAMPLE
18 F 24
LFA = LSS - 1
LSA = LFA - D + 1 25 7 31
14 E 17 18 G 21
20 4 23 24 4 27
24 - 1 = 23
18 H 18
34 1 34
CPM EXAMPLE - EXERCISE
A B D G J
6 3 2 3 5
C E H
5 9 4
F I
4 2
7 C 11 12 E 20 21 H 24
5 9 4
12 F 15 16 I 17
4 2
7 C 11 12 E 20 21 H 24
7 5 11 12 9 20 21 4 24
12 F 15 16 I 17
17 4 20 23 2 24
FF = 4
FF = ESS - EFP - 1
5 D 6 11 F 12
9 2 10 11 2 12
FLOAT CALCULATIONS
TF = 4 FF = 4
TF = LF - EF FF = ESS - EFP - 1
3 B 4 5 D 6
7 2 8 9 2 10
1 A 2 11 F 12
1 2 2 11 2 12
3 C 6 7 E 10
3 4 6 7 4 10
FLOAT – EARLY AND LATE SCHEDULES
D
Early Schedule
A
C
Float
B
E
A
Late Schedule
D
C
Float
E
B
FLOAT – EARLY AND LATE SCHEDULES
Early Schedule
Late Schedule
CRITICAL PATH
• Definition: The chain of activities that controls
the overall project completion based on
network logic. e.g. The longest path(s)
• The Critical Path is the series of activities with
the least amount of total float, and may be
positive, negative or zero
• The critical path is the longest duration path
through a network diagram and determines
the shortest time to complete the project.
• More the number of Critical paths in a network
NEAR CRITICAL ACTIVITY / PATH
NON-DRIVING
A RELATIONSHIP
EF5
C
ES11
B
EF10 DRIVING
RELATIONSHIP
MILESTONES
• A significant point / event in the project.
Mandatory which are required by contract
Optional which are based upon project requirements.
• Start Milestone: Typically used to mark the beginning of a phase or to
communicate project deliverables.
• Finish Milestone: Typically used to mark the end of a phase or to
communicate project deliverables.
CONSTRAINTS
Sche dule
Cons traint Late
Early Tim e s
Tim e s
Ne ve r
NET Start, Ne ve r e arlie r,
late r, m ay
Finis h m ay be late r
be e arlie r
Ne ve r
NLT Start,
Not affe cte d late r, m ay
Finis h
be e arlie r
Ne ve r
Ne ve r e arlie r,
ON Start, Finis h late r, m ay
m ay be late r
be e arlie r
PDM – RELATION
Compulsory TYPES
Relation (Hard Logic): Applies to work involving well
defined activities that have fixed interrelationships. This is enforced
by the technical requirement or the work methodology. These type of
relationship can not be changed during acceleration or recovery.
Construct Pump
Foundation A, B, C & D
THANK YOU