Water Quality in Biofloc Technology (BFT) An Applied Review For An Evolving Aquaculture
Water Quality in Biofloc Technology (BFT) An Applied Review For An Evolving Aquaculture
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-024-01618-w
REVIEW
Received: 2 June 2024 / Accepted: 7 July 2024 / Published online: 19 July 2024
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
Abstract
Biofloc technology (BFT) has been identified as an effective and sustainable aquaculture
method, particularly beneficial for warm-water species in tropical areas. This technology
is widely used in intensive aquaculture for several aquatic species due to its capacity to
significantly reduce water exchange rates, benefiting both production systems and the envi-
ronment. The efficacy of BFT in farming operations is directly related to a proper manage-
ment of water quality parameters within the optimal range of the target species, as these
parameters directly impact the yield of production units. Essentially, BFT functions as a
water quality management system, converting harmful nitrogenous waste such as ammonia
and nitrite into less harmful forms such as nitrates through microbial activity, ensuring
the health of aquatic organisms. Key environmental factors such as temperature, dissolved
oxygen (DO), pH, salinity, alkalinity, TAN, nitrite, nitrate, settleable solids (SS), and total
suspended solids (TSS) can affect the growth of aquatic species and the functionality of the
microbial community. This review brings (i) a comprehensive bibliometric analysis on bio-
floc and water quality, (ii) highlights optimal ranges, and (iii) key observations of several
water parameters including temperature, salinity, nitrogenous compounds, SS, TSS, DO,
phosphate, pH, and alkalinity in BFT rearing conditions for key aquatic species. Elements
such as countries, thematic and keywords, and authors were explored, correlated, and dis-
cussed. In addition, this manuscript also (iv) discusses the presence of heavy metals and
microplastics (MPs) in BFT culture water. A dedicated review on water quality in biofloc
technology will contribute to future research and development (R&D) in this topic, support
decision-making to improve farming operations, and can help further expansion of BFT-
based aquaculture.
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
9322 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Introduction
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9323
Bibliometric
This study aimed to review the research conduct on water quality in BFT. The Scopus
database was accessed for works published between 1989 and 2024 using the following
keywords (“biofloc” OR “biofloc system” OR “biofloc technology” AND “water qual-
ity” OR “dissolved oxygen”, OR “temperature”, OR “salinity”, OR “heavy metal”). In
total, 802 publications were found in the literature. Complete records and their refer-
ences were extracted to be used as bibliometric data. The research process involved five
steps including (i) gathering data, (ii) selecting the appropriate software, (iii) analyzing
the data, (iv) visualizing the results, and (v) interpreting the results.
The data was analyzed and visualized using Excel 2019, VOSviewer version 1.6.16,
and the Bibliometrix package for R (Aria and Cuccurullo 2017). For each of the records,
author, country, and year of publication were directly accessed from the Scopus data-
base (www.scopus.com/sources), and maps were created in Excel. VOSviewer was uti-
lized to create the network of countries, journals, and keywords, including author and
index keywords (Gao et al. 2018). Finally, the quality of the records was checked in
Microsoft Excel, and duplicates, spelling errors, and incomplete records were corrected.
Items that failed quality control were excluded from the study.
Three‑field plot
Relationship between three elements including countries, keywords, and authors using
Sankey plots was plotted. Three-field plots utilize colored blocks to represent the key
findings of the analyses. The total number of links between the blocks determines their
height.
13
9324 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
For the thematic map, four clusters were identified and developed: (i) low density and cen-
trality (emerging themes): The topics placed in the bottom left quadrant need further explo-
ration due to underdevelopment or being emerging subjects. These subjects enjoy limited
significance across the network and their development is slow within the network; however,
they present attractive opportunities for future research. (ii) High density and low central-
ity (basic themes): The topics located in the top right quadrant constitute the primary axes
in the body of research and are central to the developments in the field. These topics enjoy
high relevance across and inside networks. By identifying and developing these topics,
bibliometric studies highlight the opportunities for further investigation. (iii) High density
and low centrality (niche themes): Topics in the top left quadrant are internally well-con-
nected but have limited external connections, indicating their limited significance under
current circumstances. (iv) High density and centrality (motor themes): Topics in the top
right quadrant represent the major trends in the field and are central to the literature. They
have high relevance and connectivity within and across the network. Given their centrality,
bibliometric studies can shed light on their exact nature and guide future research. In the
thematic map, the bubble sizes are determined by the number of publications in which the
keyword appeared (García-Lillo et al. 2023).
For the R&D evolution, Sankey diagrams were utilized to illustrate themes and their
development over time regarding water quality in biofloc technology (Xiao et al. 2022).
In the Sankey plot, each box corresponds to a theme, with the size of the boxes indicating
frequency (Xiao et al. 2022). The lines connecting the boxes show the evolution of a theme
with line thickness corresponding to link strength.
Results
The number of “biofloc” publications increased exponentially between 1989 and 2024.
The “biofloc and water quality” ones first exceeded 50 publications in 2017 (Fig. 1).
These publications grew on average by close to 6.84% from 1989 to 2024 (Fig. 1). The
Fig. 1 Number of publications per year, as per bibliometric analysis of “biofloc and water quality” (1989–
2024)
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9325
least active years were 1990,1991, 1993–2003, and 2005–2006 while the peak occurred
in 2021 with 127 papers. As shown in Fig. 1, 802 studies were extracted from Scopus
across 190 sources between 1989 and 2024. Overall, 2460 authors had contributed to
the literature on the topic. The majority of the documents were general research articles
(n = 710), followed by reviews (n = 36). The vast majority of the records were in English
(95.7%).
Figure 2 provides a detailed graphical overview of research collaboration across the
world. The top countries in terms of productivity of the field are Brazil, China, and
India, respectively. The highest frequency of international collaboration was between
Brazil and Mexico (n = 198), followed by Brazil and USA (130), China and Malaysia
(90), Brazil and Australia (80), and China and USA (75). The blue colors in Fig. 2 indi-
cate different scientific publications in the field of biofloc, whereas darker ones indicate
higher number of publications.
The flow in the three-field plots indicates that authors from Brazil, China, and Mexico
have published the largest number of works on the subject (Fig. 3). As shown in the
figures, there are geographical preferences for certain keywords. For instance, there is a
strong relative preference among authors from Brazil for “biofloc”, “shrimp”, “P. van-
namei”, and “Oreochromis niloticus”; and for authors from China, “biofloc” and “bio-
floc technology” were preferred.
Fig. 2 Countries’ scientific production (A) and countries’ collaboration map (B) in the field
13
9326 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Fig. 3 Three-field plot for county of the corresponding country, keywords, and authors, as per bibliometric
analysis of “biofloc and water quality” (1989–2024). The height of the rectangles corresponds to the sum of
the relations originating between the elements and the thickness of the links represents the strength of the
connections
According to the results of thematic map, biofloc, shrimp growth, probiotics, nursery, and
heterotrophic bacteria are the motor themes. Moreover, aquaculture, sustainability, nitrifi-
cation, biofloc system, microalgae, and O. niloticus are emerging themes that require fur-
ther development (Fig. 4).
From a general perspective, it can be found that “biofloc” is present in all times. It is
noticeable that the terms “water quality” and “nitrification” were first used in 2020–2024.
In the following 4 years, they were further developed and sustained interest in the final
period of 2022–2024. (Fig. 5).
Research and practical application of BFT have been ongoing since the 1970s, start-
ing at Ifremer-COP and reaching commercial viability by the late 1980s (Emerenciano
et al. 2013). BFT as an aquaculture production system is evolving quickly; however, its
core still emphasizes the growth of a large microbial population in water, leading to the
formation of microbial aggregates known as “bioflocs” (Khanjani and Sharifinia 2024).
These living microbial particles play a crucial role in controlling nitrogenous com-
pounds in the culture water (Emerenciano et al. 2017). Both BFT and RAS utilize bio-
logical processes to achieve nitrogen removal, but their approaches differ significantly
(Liu et al. 2021). For instance, besides the chemoautotrophic communities (nitrifying
bacteria), BFT also relies on heterotrophic microorganisms for toxic N-compounds con-
trol (Khanjani et al. 2022). In addition, the typical “clear-water” environment found in
RAS is not the case in BFT where some levels of suspended solids are expected but
must be maintained within acceptable levels for the different aquatic species (Gaona
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9327
et al. 2017; Emerenciano et al. 2017). Also, BFT systems are normally less expensive to
set up and run than RAS, as well as offering several other biological benefits over tradi-
tional clear-water RAS (Liu et al. 2019).
There has been a marked increase in publications on BFT in aquaculture since 2015.
These publications are not only related to laboratory scale, but also carried out in large
commercial operations (Emerenciano et al. 2022a). In this sense, BFT is increasingly
viewed as a sustainable alternative in aquaculture, particularly in tropical shrimp farm-
ing (Ulloa Walker et al. 2020; Emerenciano et al. 2021; El-Sayed 2021). One of the
key attributes is the in situ circularity, in which bioflocs are able to control the nutrient
content in the water by converting waste nitrogen into microbial biomass and serve as
13
9328 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
supplemental feed for the cultured species (Khanjani et al. 2023a). Moreover, bacteria
in the bioflocs offer additional health benefits by outcompeting pathogenic microbes
and acting as natural probiotics (Deng et al. 2022; Bagi et al. 2023). Therefore, BFT is
seen as a new chapter in the “blue revolution” (Stokstad 2010). Facilitated by minimal
water exchange and circularity properties, BFT continuously boosts the recycle and
reuse of nutrients within the culture medium (Raza et al. 2024). The system’s sustain-
ability is further highlighted by (i) its high production efficiency and small footprint
(da Silveira et al. 2020); and (ii) nutrition attributes due to improved feed efficiency as
a result of continuous ingestion of protein and lipid-rich microbial aggregates (Khan-
jani et al. 2024b). This natural productivity (bioflocs) is crucial in preserving the water
quality. Microorganisms are the central pivot in BFT operations (Emerenciano et al.
2021). Water quality is controlled through encouraging mainly heterotrophic and nitri-
fying bacterial growth and regulating photoautotrophic communities by maintaining
among others (i) a suitable carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio. This ratio is essential for
optimal growth of heterotrophic bacteria, which utilize carbon for maintenance of
essential activities such as respiration, feeding, digestion, and reproduction (Emeren-
ciano et al. 2021; Khanjani et al. 2023b, 2023c). But also (ii) high DO and alkalinity
levels to ensure a proper nitrification process (Furtado et al. 2015).
In terms of C:N ratio management in BFT, it typically involves two phases (Emeren-
ciano et al. 2021). Firstly, the development phase employing a specific C:N ratio (normally
10–20:1) and addition of an external carbon source such as grains and sugars (Wei et al.
2016); and secondly, the maintenance phase reducing or eliminating the external carbon
inputs, depending mainly on TAN, NO2 values, and desirable SS levels (Khanjani et al.
2024c).
A proper water quality management is crucial to the success of production cycles in aqua-
culture farms. BFT systems are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in factors such as tem-
perature, DO, pH, salinity, suspended solids, alkalinity, orthophosphate, and nitrogenous
compounds, but also other external factors such as light intensity and minerals. A holistic
view of these parameters and their interconnection is crucial for effective and sustainable
management. For that, Tables 1, 2, and 3 bring key information regarding BFT and water
quality management. Table 1 summarizes water quality parameters in different studies con-
ducted using a variety of aquaculture systems and BFT. Table 2 shows the suitable ranges
of water quality parameters in the biofloc aquaculture system. And finally Table 3 shows
the effects of manipulating different water parameters in BFT and the impact on animal
performance in several species.
It is important to note that each species demands specific conditions that require regu-
lar monitoring to promote growth and ensure survival. Thus, water quality has a profound
effect on the health of the organisms, survival rates, and the profitability of aquaculture
(Tumwesigye et al. 2022). While parameters such as salinity is often relatively constant in
the system, others such as alkalinity and DO may change, especially in high biomass, and
interventions are needed. An in-depth understanding of key water quality parameters and
their interactions in BFT is essential for decision-making and suitable interventions within
the production cycles.
13
Table 1 Comparative analysis of water quality in clear water and biofloc systems across different studies
Rearing Cultivated spe- T (°C) S (g/L) pH A (mg DO TSS TAN NO2 NO3 PO4-P Reference
system cies/life stage CaCO3/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
BFT P. vannamei/adult 30 34.2 7.1 126 4.0 546.7 0.38 0.23 22.9 54.5 Vinatea
et al. 2009
BFT P. vannamei/PL 29.16– 7.33–7.76 215.33– 6.61–6.94 190.92– 0.12–0.35 0.026– 6.97– 0.54–0.66 Lim et al.
31.28 273.33 304.38 0.035 10.73 2021
BFT P. vannamei/J 27.05– 33.5 7.5–7.90 100–162.2 4.9–5.1 850–890 0.3–0.4 3.1–4.0 57.5– 5–6.68 Furtado
27.25 60.53 et al. 2011
CW 27 33 6.86 78 5.1 870 0.6 4.3 54.5 8.2
BFT O. niloticus/J 27.55– 6.56–8.27 44.72– 5.69–6.04 485– 0.94–1.68 7.03–10.1 105–140 6.93– Martins
27.70 175.90 548.61 10.23 et al. 2019
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
BFT Macrobrachium 26.34– 7.76–7.80 137.69– 6.48–6.98 298.7– 0.21–0.54 0.64–0.92 2.1–2.42 Islam et al.
rosenbergii 26.47 148.95 445.2 2023
CW 26.39 7.85 139.78 6.75 168.4 0.71 1.98 3.12
BFT Lates calcarifer/J 27.2–27.5 0 7.8–8 94.6–96.0 7.5–7.7 0.42–0.45 0.9–0.94 0.13–0.17 0.081– Whangchai
0.098 et al. 2022
BFT Clarias 7.3–7.76 177.13– 7.51–7.79 Chen et al.
gariepinus/J 263.53 2020
BFT Litopenaeus 27.49 5 8.50 7.61 7.25 0.11 1.37 87.34 Valenzuela-
setiferus/N 28.02 35 8.03 5.33 6.6 0.29 1.47 92.34 Jiménez
et al. 2022
BFT P. vannamei/J 28.38– 35.3–36 7.36–7.76 133.4– 4.49–4.91 280.16– 1.0–5.91 1.97–8.97 3.97– 2.7–3.67 Lara et al.
30.79 229.7 460.5 14.88 2017
BFT Colossoma 25.78 6.32 11.13 0.34 0.67 2.60 dos Santos
CW macropomum/J 25.97 6.97 6.67 1.98 0.59 5.09 et al. 2020
BFT P. vannamei/N 29.2 34.5–34.9 117–120 5.6 0.25–0.27 3.81–4.14 43.58– 4.83–5.03 Gaona et al.
44.63 2016
CW 29.06 35.43 113.98 5.47 0.31 4.18 54.72 5.34
9329
13
Table 1 (continued)
9330
Rearing Cultivated spe- T (°C) S (g/L) pH A (mg DO TSS TAN NO2 NO3 PO4-P Reference
system cies/life stage CaCO3/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
13
BFT Rhamdia 24.7–25.4 1.3–1.4 7.7–8.0 107.9– 6.5–6.8 538.4– 0.05–0.26 0.01–0.8 58.4–86.0 12.4–13.9 Poli et al.
quelen/F 187.5 157.0 2015
CW 25.35 0.3 7.7 83.7 6.7 - 0.11 0.02 20.3 6.9
BFT P. vannamei 29.7 33.0–33.7 7.5–7.8 133.3– 4.8–5.5 4.0–9.1 Schveitzer
218.4 et al. 2013
BFT P. vannamei 30.8 30.6 8.27 171.6– 7.49 304–618 0.27–0.29 0.23–0.32 7.21–8.83 Liu et al.
nauplius 174.1 2022
CW 30.7 31 8.29 167.7 7.5 213 0.5 0.03 3.30
BFT Piaractus 25.95– 8.00 96.21– 6.76–6.90 278.50– 0.25 3.33 48.13– Angeles-
brachypomus/F 26.10 103.27 363.3 59.63 Escobar
CW 26.01 7.74 58.37 6.82 7.20 0.33 0.31 21.73 et al. 2022
BFT P. vannamei/N 23.08– 25 76–7.8 138.68– 5.99–7.39 285.08– 0.24–0.57 0.61–0.93 2.09–2.56 Rajkumar
23.16 153.52 493.5 et al. 2016
CW 23.29 25 7.8 138.89 6.57 158.5 0.78 1.89 3.21
BFT P. vannamei/J 27.86– 37.23– 7.74–7.93 116.71– 5.68–5.85 306.37– 2.54–3.42 0.73– 0.38–1.73 0.51–4.82 Gaona et al.
28.17 38.49 159.29 745.2 10.28 2017
BFT O. niloticus/F 28.20 10.5 7.9 6.7–6.9 191.8 0.3 0.6 25.4 Fleckenstein
CW 28.35 10.3 7.8 6.9–7.0 132.1 0.2 0.1 22.3 et al. 2018
BFT P. vannamei/G 30.18 23.59 7.16 5.57 244.0 0.16 2.63 0.73 3.44 Pimentel
and N et al. 2020
BFT O. niloticus/J 27.54– 7.10–7.50 56.11–70 6.40–6.51 635–841.5 3.56–3.70 0.56–0.99 321.18– Eid et al.
27.68 466.82 2021
CW 27.54 8.03 48.89 6.58 588.64 2.20 0.80 450.30
BFT O. niloticus/F 27.55– 7.33–7.53 48.95– 5.91–5.97 501.47– 0.73–1.17 5.94–8.14 117.50– 1.75–8.30 Martins
27.70 75.76 707.49 143.33 et al. 2017
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 1 (continued)
Rearing Cultivated spe- T (°C) S (g/L) pH A (mg DO TSS TAN NO2 NO3 PO4-P Reference
system cies/life stage CaCO3/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
BFT Labeo rohita/F 27.06 7.07 5.4 284.48 0.11 0.03 0.03 Kamilya
et al. 2017
CW 27.06 6.59 6.53 23.85 0.06 0.03 0.06
BFT Etroplus 25–25.3 0.095 7.66–7.69 7.43–7.65 1307– 0.008 0.23 0.2 0.36–0.39 Thilakan,
suratensis/J 1318 et al. 2019
CW 25.6 0.094 8.32 7.17 1249.57 0.01 0.20 0.22 0.37
BFT P. vannamei/PL 28.8–29.2 10.3–30.2 7.7–7.9 310–322 7.7–8.9 263–330 0.7–1.2 0.3–0.6 0.3–1.4 2.0–2.6 Ray and
Lotz 2017
BFT O. niloticus/J 27.57– 0–16 7.4–7.6 93–152 4.70–5.15 384.5– 3.94–5.84 0.82–8.89 40.58– 22.12– de Souza
27.77 566.9 65.58 35.01 et al. 2019
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
BFT O. niloticus/F 23.2 0.3‰ 8.1 198.0– 7.1 154.9 1.6–2.0 0.5–1.1 6.8–13.6 5.7–7.6 Silva et al.
301.8 –435.6 2017
BFT O. niloticus/J 23.97– 7.72–7.85 159.7– 6.17–6.32 465.9– 0.14–0.25 0.10–0.29 44.76–142 Dilmi et al.
24.19 168.77 750.5 2022
CW 24.15 8.04 177.5 6.60 - 0.11 0.12 7.19
BFT Gibelion catla/F 26.74– 7.4–7.7 37.0–42.67 5.7–5.9 93.55– 0.22–0.26 0.019– 11.27– Solanki
26.82 140.68 0.035 15.81 et al. 2023
BFT P. vannamei/PL 28.45– 30.1– 7.87–8.15 124.10– 4.67–5.95 123.53– 0.46–0.86 0.14–0.39 0.10–0.22 0.52–0.98 Panigrahi
28.90 30.77 140.25 328.55 et al. 2019
CW 28.45 30.15 8.58 150.25 6.94 60.58 1.45 0.75 0.67 0.43
BFT P. vannamei/J 28.7–28.8 5.0‰ 6.9–7.7 104.0– 5.28–5.57 327.4– 1.3–7.1 1.9–14.0 4.6–77.0 Huang et al.
173.0 682.1 2022b
Abbreviations: T temperature, S salinity, A alkalinity, DO dissolved oxygen, TSS total suspended solids, TAN total ammonia nitrogen, PL postlarvae, J juveniles, N nursery, F
fry, G grow-out
9331
13
Table 2 The suitable ranges of water quality parameters in the biofloc system
9332
13
T (°C) 26–32 °C Optimal temperatures are species-specific. For instance, Ahammed et al. 2022; Emerenciano et al. 2017; Kim et al.
ranges from 26 to 28 °C are suitable for P. vannamei and 2019
tilapia species. Temperatures outside these ranges can
lead to reduced growth and disturbances in physiologi-
cal and behavioral activities. Excessive temperatures
can cause a decrease in oxygen levels and increase stress
during breathing
S (g/L) 4–33 The salinity levels are species-specific and must be kept Khanjani and Alizadeh, 2023; Khanjani et al. 2020a
according to the tolerance range. In biofloc systems, the
salinity level increases due to the limitation of water
replacement and the accumulation of uneaten food waste
pH 6.5–8.5 Levels outside these ranges can impact growth and lead to Emerenciano et al. 2017; Ahammed et al. 2022
disturbances in physiological and behavioral activities. In
biofloc systems, high TSS/SS and respiration rates may
cause pH reduction
Alkalinity (mg CaCO3/L) Higher than 100 mg/L High alkalinity minimizes the daily fluctuation in pH. In Van Wyk and Scarpa 1999; Furtado et al. 2015; Emeren-
addition, higher alkalinity levels (> 100 mg/L) are critical ciano et al. 2017
to support TAN processing by heterotrophic and chemo-
autotrophic bacteria
DO (mg/L) Higher than 5 mg/L Higher levels (> 5 mg/L) will safely sustain fish-shrimp Vinatea et al. 2009; Kuhn and Lawrence 2012;
physiological responses, as well as microbial develop-
ment. The stability of DO levels is dependent on several
factors including TSS, SS, salinity, and temperature
TSS (mg/L) 200–500 Species and age dependent (e.g., normally young individu- Schveitzer et al. 2013; Hargreaves 2013; Gaona et al. 2017
als are more resistant compared to their older counter-
parts). The level of TSS can significantly impact the
dissolved oxygen level, pH, and alkalinity. High levels
of TSS (e.g., > 500 mg/L) can impair the growth and
survival of several cultured aquatic species
SS (mL/L) 5–15 mL/L for Same as per TSS. High levels of SS (e.g., > 15 mL/L) can Emerenciano et al. 2017
shrimp, and 5–20 impair the growth and survival of several cultured aquatic
for tilapia species
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 2 (continued)
Parameter Appropriate range Considerations Reference
TAN (mg/L) Lower than 1 mg/L Dependent on factors such as species-age, temperature, pH, Ebeling et al. 2006a; 2006b;
and salinity. Three processes (photosynthesis, assimila- Emerenciano et al. 2017
tion, and nitrification) play a significant role in control- Khanjani et al. 2022
ling TAN in BFT
NO2 (mg/L) Lower than 1 mg/L Mainly dependent on factors such as species-age and salin- Vinatea et al. 2010; Emerenciano et al. 2017
ity. Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria are slow growers and quite
sensible to environmental changes
NO3 (mg/L) Lower than 200 mg/L Mainly dependent on factors such as species-age and Emerenciano et al. 2017; Gaona et al. 2017
salinity. For some species only toxic at higher levels
(e.g., > 400 mg/L). High concentration of TSS and SS
can boost nitrate levels in water
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
PO4 (mg/L) 0.5–20 mg/L Accumulation is expected BFT systems. Bacteria and Silva et al. 2013; Emerenciano et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2018
algae, as well as TSS and SS can play a role with PO4
fluctuations
Heavy metals (HMs) Unknown Salinity and feed inputs can play a key role on HMs accu- Deswati et al. 2022
mulation and toxicity
Abbreviations: T temperature, S salinity, A alkalinity, DO dissolved oxygen, TSS total suspended solids, TAN total ammonia nitrogen
9333
13
Table 3 Manipulation of water quality parameters and impact on performance in biofloc technology in target aquaculture species
9334
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
P. vannamei 1.91 WT (15, 21, 27, and 33 °C) P. vannamei shrimps were Shrimp reared at 15 and de Souza et al. 2016
stocked in the tanks at a 33 °C displayed higher
density equivalent to 200 activity of antioxidant
2
shrimps/m (or 40 shrimps enzymes as a defense
per tank), for 60 days mechanism against the
overproduction of ROS
triggered by temperature
stress
P. vannamei 6.5 WT (15, 21, 27, and 33 °C) The experimental setup Shrimp subjected to 15 and de Souza et al. 2014
comprised of 12 tanks, 21 °C temperatures exhib-
each with a capacity of ited increased enzyme
250 L. Shrimps were then activities. Moreover,
stocked in these tanks at a this adverse temperature
density of 150 shrimps/m2 condition might directly or
indirectly induce stress in
the animals
Paralichthys olivaceus 27.96 WT (20, 22, 24, 26, 28, and The experimental system The research shows that Kim et al. 2019
30 °C) included 12 tanks, each temperatures exceeding
with a capacity of 250 26 °C led to hematological
L. P. olivaceus fish were alterations and oxida-
stocked in each tank, tive stress in juvenile P.
with a total of 10 fish per olivaceus fish in a biofloc
tank. This configuration system
led to a total of 120 fish
being stocked across the
12 tanks. The fish were
grouped into six water
temperature categories,
with duplicates for each
category
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis 0.015 WT (21, 24, 27, 30, 33 °C) A 30-day nursery phase F. brasiliensis shrimp Hostins et al. 2015
trial was conducted at nursed at 27 °C in a
different temperatures. F. super-intensive biofloc
brasiliensis (PL23) were dominated system dem-
stocked in each of the 25 onstrated superior growth
tanks, with a density of performance, including
600 shrimps/m2. Each tank increased productivity,
had a volume of 150 L quicker growth, and higher
survival rates
P. vannamei 0.004 WT (24, 28, and 32 °C) The experimental setup The optimal conditions for Ponce-Palafox et al. 2019
Salinity (10, 20, and 30 g/L) involved 27 indoor plastic achieving the highest spe-
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
13
Table 3 (continued)
9336
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
P. vannamei WT (°C), TSS The BFT systems were The bioflocs have a richer Pimentel et al. 2020
operated using molasses elemental composition
or white sugar as a carbon in terms of nitrogen and
source, creating a favora- phosphorus. Systems with
ble heterotrophic environ- higher WT and higher
ment with C:N ratios all TSS have a greater ability
very close to 10 to absorb and immobilize
these elements in the
bioflocs
WT (15, 20, 25, and 30 °C) Each temperature group con- The study concluded that Yao et al. 2013
tained three replicates in a biofloc bacteria can
randomized block design. enhance the effectiveness
To ensure sufficient mix- of sludge treatment at
ing intensity and saturated 25 °C. At this temperature,
DO, a bubbling diffusive a significant amount of
air stone was used in ammonia nitrogen removal
each reactor. Glucose was was achieved in just 3 h
added to achieve a C:N without increasing the
ratio greater than 20 nitrite and nitrate concen-
trations in the SBRs. The
process was found to be
more efficient at 25 °C
than in the other three
temperature groups
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
O. niloticus 3.68 NaHCO3 The fish were distributed The recommendation Martins et al. 2017
CaCO3 into experimental units, of using NaHCO3 and
Ca(OH)2 with each unit having a Ca(OH)2 for alkalinity
for alkalinity and pH cor- useful volume of 37.5 and pH correction in Nile
rection L. There were 25 fish tilapia nursery in BFT sys-
per tank. When the TAN tems. These practices can
levels in the tanks reached enhance fish growth and
a value higher than net yield while potentially
1.0 mg/L, molasses was providing economic ben-
added to correct the C:N efits through the judicious
ratio. The C:N ratio was use of these compounds
adjusted to a ratio of 15:1
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
by adding molasses
9337
13
Table 3 (continued)
9338
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
P. vannamei 6 Alkalinity and suit- The experiment was con- It is evident that calcium Furtado et al. 2011
able sources (Ca(OH)2, ducted using juveniles hydroxide and sodium
Na2CO3, NaHCO3) stocked in 150-L 12 tanks bicarbonate are effective
at a density of 333 shrimp/ compounds for increasing
m3 alkalinity in BFT cultures.
These compounds success-
fully elevated alkalinity
levels, which is important
for maintaining stable
water conditions and sup-
porting optimal fish health
and growth. The study
also revealed that main-
taining adequate levels of
alkalinity and pH is cru-
cial for water quality and
zootechnical performance
in BFT cultures. When
alkalinity concentrations
remained below 100 mg
CaCO3/L and pH levels
were consistently below 7
for extended periods, both
water quality and the per-
formance of the fish were
negatively affected
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
Artemia franciscana Alkalinity: A total of 35 pairs of In this study, an alkalinity Naserizadeh et al. 2020
75, 150, 225, and 300 mg Artemia (male and female) level of 150 mg per liter
CaCo3/L were cultured in 50-mL of calcium carbonate was
tubes under biofloc found to significantly
conditions for a period of improve the performance
3 weeks of biofloc production com-
pared to other alkalinity
levels. It is recommended
for the production of
biofloc for Artemia feed-
ing from the nauplii to the
adult stage
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
P. vannamei 0.2 Alkalinity: 12 experimental units, each Bioflocs were successfully Furtado et al. 2015
75, 150, 225, and 300 mg with a total volume of formed during the rearing
Caco3/L 50 L, were filled with of P. vannamei without
30 juvenile shrimp. This the need for water renewal
stocking density resulted when the alkalinity levels
in a density of 150 exceeded 70 mg C aCO3/L
shrimps/m2. The shrimp and pH levels were above
were kept in these units for 7.38. The treatments
a duration of 49 days as with higher alkalinity
part of the experiment levels, specifically at 300
mgCaCO3/L, exhibited
favorable nitrification
rates and zootechnical
performance
9339
13
Table 3 (continued)
9340
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
O. niloticus 3.68 pH: 6.5, 7.5, 8.3 The experiment took place Maintaining a pH range of Martins et al. 2019
over a period of 60 days in 6.5–7.5 in biofloc systems
indoor tanks. Each experi- can lead to improved
mental unit, with a volume growth, higher net yield,
of 37.5 L, was stocked and reduced FCR in tilapia
with 25 fish. Liquid sugar nursery production. This
cane molasses was used to pH range enhances the
correct the C:N ratio, with efficiency of the biofloc
a ratio of 15:1 system for tilapia rearing
P. vannamei 6.56 pH: 7.1–7.6; 7.6–8.1 The experiment was car- The study’s findings indicate Zhang et al. 2017
ried out in nine indoor that adjusting the pH of
fiberglass tanks, each the culture water in BFT
with a water volume of systems from 7.6 to 8.1
90 L. The shrimp were yielded better results
transferred to these tanks compared to adjusting
at a density of 30 shrimp it from 7.1 to 7.6. These
per tank and were kept results will be valuable for
there for a period of shrimp producers aiming
48 days. The BFT method to maintain appropriate
was employed, and sodium pH and alkalinity levels in
bicarbonate was used to their BFT systems
adjust the pH levels
P. vannamei 0.24 Salinity: 2, 4, and 25 g/L The shrimp were grown at The highest growth perfor- Maica et al., 2012
a density of 300/m2, with mance and survival rates
molasses and wheat bran were seen at a salinity
serving as carbon sources. level of 25 g/L. However,
The C:N ratio was about it was also found that the
20:1, and the entire pro- shrimp could be success-
cess took 40 days fully raised at a salinity
level of 4 g/L
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
P. vannamei 1.79–1.89 Salinity: 9, 18, and 36 Pacific white shrimp were Salinity affects natural com- Decamp et al. 2003
stocked at 50 individuals/ munities and production of
m2 for 60 days P. vannamei
P. vannamei 2.56 Salinity: 10 and 32 g/L This research was conducted The trial found that P. van- Khanjani et al. 2020a
in indoor 300-L fiberglass namei exhibited superior
tanks, with each tank hold- performance in their
ing a total water volume juvenile stage when an
of 180 L. Each tank artificial diet was sup-
was populated with 70 plemented with biofloc at
individuals, corresponding a salinity level of 32
to a biomass of 1 g/L. To
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
13
Table 3 (continued)
9342
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
Litopenaeus setiferus 0.1 Salinity: 5 and 35 g/L Juvenile shrimps weighing The biofloc system has been Valenzuela-Jiménez et al.
0.1 g were distributed found to be effective in 2022
across six fiberglass tanks, stabilizing and enhancing
with each tank housing conditions for L. setiferus,
3000 juveniles (equivalent a highly potential penaeid
to 150 shrimps/m3). These species for farming, under
juveniles were allowed to high salinity conditions.
acclimatize for five days. However, during the
Three groups were set up experimental phase, the
and monitored over the system was designed to
course of the experiment, stimulate oxidative stress,
which lasted 90 days. leading to increased cellu-
During the experimental lar damage at low salinity
period, molasses was levels due to high oxygen
added in a 6:1 C:N ratio consumption under fasting
whenever the Ammonia and postprandial condi-
level exceeded 1 mg per tions
liter
Red tilapia 13.78 Salinity: 5, 10, 15, and Red tilapia fry were stocked The current research Kumari et al. 2021
20 g/L in each biofloc unit at a indicates that when reared
rate of 150 fish per cubic in higher salinity condi-
meter. Jaggery was used as tions using inland saline
the carbon source to main- groundwater, red tilapia
tain a C/N ratio of 15:1 demonstrated improved
growth efficiency, survival
rates, biochemical indica-
tors, and carcass quality
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
P. vannamei Salinity: 10, 20, and 30 g/L P. vannamei (PL8) were Operating at a low salinity Ray and Lotz 2017
stocked at 4000 shrimp/m3 of 10‰ can significantly
for 54 days reduce salt usage by
approximately 50% com-
pared to a 20‰ treatment,
resulting in substantial
cost savings for production
facilities. This research
contributes to demon-
strating the versatility of
salinity options for shrimp
production in commercial-
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
13
Table 3 (continued)
9344
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
O. niloticus 1.75 Salinity: 0, 4, and 8 g/L Fingerling fish were reared The study suggests that Khanjani and Alizadeh 2024
for 37 days in tanks, each salinity levels of 4 and
having a water volume of 8 g/L can enhance water
140 L. The stocking den- quality, growth perfor-
sity was one fish per liter mance, survival, and
carcass composition of
Nile tilapia fingerlings in a
biofloc system. This find-
ing implies that brackish
waters can be effectively
used for sustainable
aquaculture in the rearing
of Nile tilapia
O. niloticus 93.8 Salinity: 0, 4, 8, 12, and Tilapia were cultivated for The study suggests that de Souza et al. 2019
16 g/L 90 days in fiberglass tanks, BFT, developed at
each with a volume of 800 salinities ranging from 0
L. The stocking density to 16 g/L, is suitable for
was set at 30 fish/m3 the culture of tilapia. The
water quality was main-
tained in proper conditions
for fish performance, with
high rates of survival
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
O. niloticus 40 Salinity: 0, 4, 8, 12, and The experiment was The study found that nitrite de Alvarenga et al. 2018
16 g/L conducted for 70 days in peaks occurred later and
150-L fiberglass tanks, were higher in salinities of
with 60 fish being kept in 12 and 16 g/L compared
each tank to other treatments.
Water that was salinized,
particularly within the
range of 4 to 8 g/L, can be
recommended for use in
a biofloc tank to enhance
the growth performance
of Nile tilapia during the
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
13
Table 3 (continued)
9346
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
Lates calcarifer 11 DO Asian sea bass (at a density The study successfully Whangchai et al. 2022
of 30 fish/m3) were established the use of
raised in 50-ton ponds for aeration devices and opti-
100 days mized feeding frequen-
cies to enhance oxygen
levels in 60-ton freshwater
recirculating aquaculture
ponds and the biofloc
system for Asian seabass
rearing. This approach
proved to be more efficient
than using an ejector, as
it increased dissolved
oxygen levels through the
use of small bubbles and a
large specific contact area
Piaractus mesopotamicus 20.70 TSS levels (0, 1500, 3000, The treatments were main- Pacu juveniles exhib- Pellegrin et al. 2022
4000, 5000, 6000, and tained in a static system ited tolerance to TSS
7000 mg/L) using 8 L tanks, with 6 concentrations of up to
L of usable volume, and 5000 mg/L, which are not
aeration. Only the water typically utilized in BFT
collected for water quality systems. The LC50-96 h
analysis was replaced. (lethal concentration that
Molasses, a carbon-rich causes mortality in 50%
substance, was used to of the population within
adjust the carbon to nitro- 96 h) of TSS for pacu was
gen ratio to 15:1 estimated to be 5477 mg/L
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
P. mesopotamicus 28.41 TSS levels (0, 250, 500, 750, 80-L tanks with a useful vol- The exposure of fish to Pellegrin et al. 2022
and 1000 mg/L) ume of 60 L were utilized. elevated TSS concentra-
Each tank contained six tions, particularly 750 and
fish, resulting in a total of 1000 mg/L, resulted in
18 fish per treatment. The increased levels of blood
duration of the experiment glucose, pH, erythrocytes,
was 5 days hemoglobin values, and
hematimetric indices on
the first day. However, by
the fifth day, most of these
parameters stabilized at
varying TSS concentra-
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
tions. It is important to
note that TSS concentra-
tions of up to 250 mg/L
are recommended for BFT
system production
9347
13
Table 3 (continued)
9348
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
Rhamdia quelen TSS: A 21-day trial was The control treatment in Poli et al. 2015
in three concentrations conducted to assess the the experiment recorded
up to 200, effectiveness of biofloc the lowest survival rate
400–600, technology in the growth (10.2%) due to an infesta-
800–1000 mg/L of R. quelen. The fish tion of Ichthyophthirius
were reared at a density multifiliis on the 15th day.
of 25 larvae per liter of However, no infestation
water. The purpose of the was observed in the bio-
experiment was to evalu- floc treatments, resulting
ate the performance and in a significantly higher
potential benefits of using mean survival rate (46.9%)
BFT in the production of compared to the control
R. quelen The study suggests that
R. quelen larvae can be
successfully grown in a
biofloc system with TSS
concentrations of up to
1000 mg/L. However, it
was found that the best
growth occurred in tanks
with a higher percent-
age of volatile suspended
solids (up to 200 mg/L)
and clear water achieved
through the daily addition
of dextrose
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
P. vannamei 6.8 TSS: Juvenile shrimp were According to the study, Schveitzer et al. 2013
in three concentrations: stocked in twelve 850-L intermediate levels of
200, tanks at a stocking density bioflocs, specifically TSS
400–600, of 459 shrimps/m3. The concentrations rang-
800–1000 mg/L study spanned a period ing between 400 and
of 44 days, during which 600 mg/L, were found to
the growth and develop- be more suitable for the
ment of the shrimp were super-intensive culture
monitored and evaluated. of P. vannamei shrimp.
The purpose of the study This finding suggests
was likely to assess the that maintaining TSS
performance and produc- concentrations between
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
13
Table 3 (continued)
9350
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
P. vannamei Nauplius (N5) TSS, 300 and 600 mg/L In the 14-day study, the As the TSS levels increased, Liu et al. 2022
focus was on investigating there was an increase in
the nursery phase of the nitrate and total nitrogen
nauplius (N5) stage of P. concentrations. On the
vannamei in a BFT system other hand, alkalinity
and pH decreased with
increasing TSS levels.
Based on the findings, it
suggests that a BFT sys-
tem with TSS levels below
300 mg/L can achieve
better performance in
the nursery phase of P.
vannamei nauplii. This
indicates that maintaining
a lower TSS level in the
system can have a positive
impact on the overall
water quality and the
development of the nauplii
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
Carassius auratus gibelio 6.4 TSS concentrations (10, 300, A tank with a volume of The optimal TSS concentra- Zhang et al. 2018
600, 800, and 1000 mg/L) 1.80 m3 was filled with tion for gibel carp culture
freshwater. The tank was was found to be within the
stocked with gibel carp at range of 600–800 mg/L.
a density of 250 individu- This suggests that main-
als. The experiment lasted taining TSS levels within
for a duration of 30 days. this range can promote
Molasses was added to the better growth and perfor-
tank 2 h after each feeding. mance of gibel carp in the
The molasses addition was system. Furthermore, the
done at a C/N ratio of 15 study results indicated that
bioflocs produced in the
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
13
Table 3 (continued)
9352
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
O. niloticus, Sciaenops ocel- 85 tilapia, 2 TSS The experiment compared The study suggests that Poersch et al. 2021
latus, and P. vannamei shrimp, and 71 the use of tilapia to control Pacific white shrimp, red
red drum suspended solids (biologi- drum, and tilapia can be
cal treatment) to control successfully cultured in
systems without tilapia. an integrated multispecies
The initial mean weights system using BFT. This
and stocking densities indicates that these three
were: 2 g and 250 ind/ species can coexist and
m3 for shrimp; 71 g and thrive in the same system,
1.04 kg/m3 for red drum; which can have potential
3
and 85 g and 5.12 kg/m benefits such as resource
for tilapia utilization and waste
management
P. vannamei 4.54 TSS In the 42-day trial, different The findings emphasize the Gaona et al. 2017
100–300, 300–600, and treatments with three importance of carefully
600–1000 mg/L ranges of TSS were tested. managing TSS concentra-
Shrimp juveniles were tions (between 100 and
stocked at a density of 372 300 mg/L) during the for-
shrimps/m3 mation and maintenance
of biofloc systems. By
maintaining TSS within
the recommended range
and reducing variations,
aquaculture practition-
ers can optimize water
quality, enhance nutrient
recycling, and support the
overall health and per-
formance of the cultured
organisms
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Table 3 (continued)
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
P. vannamei 6.2 TSS The experimental design Cultivation of U. lactuca in Carvalho et al. 2023
30 and 400 mg/L was carried out with shrimp effluent water with
three treatments, (1) a TSS level of 30 mg/L
BFT: cultivation of Ulva resulted in significantly
lactuca in effluent from lower TSS levels com-
shrimp cultivation in a pared to the BFT groups,
BFT, with 400 mg/L of which had a TSS level of
TSS; (2) DEC: cultivation 400 mg/L. This method
of U. lactuca in effluent can be used to improve
from shrimp culture in water quality and reduce
a BFT, after a period of environmental impacts
decantation of solids, with associated with shrimp
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
13
Table 3 (continued)
9354
Cultured species IBW (g) Influential parameter Relevant rearing conditions Main findings Reference
13
O. niloticus 8.32 MPs Nile tilapia were exposed to It can be concluded that Hu et al. 2023
MPs made of polystyrene MPs had no significant
with a diameter range of effects on nitrification in
32–40 μm. The exposure the BFT systems or on
was conducted in a BFT the digestive activity of
system for a duration of tilapia. The presence of
28 days. Three different MPs did not significantly
treatment groups were influence the microbial
used: 0 items/L (con- communities in the BFT
trol group), 80 items/L systems or the gut micro-
(equivalent to 30 μg/L), biota of the tilapia
and 800 items/L (equiva-
lent to 300 μg/L)
Abbreviations: IBW initial body weight, WT water temperature, C:N carbon to nitrogen ratio, GIFT genetically improved farmed tilapia, DO dissolved oxygen, TSS total sus-
pended solids, T-LS treatment-low solids, T-HS treatment-high solids, ROS reactive oxygen species, FW final weight, SGR specific growth rate, SBRs sequencing batch reac-
tors, PL postlarvae, PPT parts per thousand, MPs microplastics
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9355
Temperature
Water temperature is a key determinant of the health and survival of cultured organ-
isms as fluctuations in temperature can adversely affect growth and survival (Whang-
chai et al. 2018; Cheng et al. 2018). Temperature also influences various chemical and
biological parameters, including DO and the rate of chemical reactions (Mubiana and
Blust 2007; Hostins et al. 2015). Increasing water temperatures can result in a drop in
DO, leading to respiratory distress marked by difficult breathing and heightened oxy-
gen exchange on the surface of the gills (Lewis et al. 2012). Temperature also affects
physiological pathways, behaviors, and reproduction, leading to changes in maturation
and stages of reproduction such as ovulation, hatching, and embryogenesis (Narum
et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2017). Microbial metabolism is similarly affected by tempera-
ture (Price and Sowers 2004). Very cold temperatures (4 °C) promote deflocculation
compared to cool temperatures (18–20 °C), likely due to reduced microbial activity
in the flocs (Wilen et al. 2000). In warmer waters (30–35 °C), sludge bulking occurs,
characterized by high sludge volume index (SVI ≥ 500 mL/g), due to overproduction of
extracellular polymeric substances (Krishna and Van Loosdrecht 1999). At moderate
temperatures (20–25 °C), flocs are more stable with a medium SVI of around 200 mL/g.
It can be challenging to adjust water temperature in BFT ponds, particularly in outdoor
farms, due to the costs associated with temperature regulation (Phulia et al. 2012). Tem-
perature greatly impacts biofloc characteristics. Lower temperatures restrict biological
processes including the activity of microbial organisms (Arnosti et al. 1998; Garcia
et al. 2011; de Souza et al. 2016). This could impede the growth of biofloc microorgan-
isms and lower the rate of nitrification. This effect is most pronounced when the cold
exposure is sudden. Experiences from activated sludge systems suggest suitable organic
matter biodegradation and nitrification under sub-20 °C conditions, but extremely low
temperatures may potentially lead to a complete cessation of nitrification (Johnston
et al. 2019). The mechanisms underpinning the relationship between temperature and
nitrification are still unclear, but changes in the interactions between microorganisms
are one of the possibilities. An overwintering experiment in tilapia culture showed that
existing bioflocs withstood < 4 °C temperatures and still carried out nitrogen removal
(Crab et al. 2009). Water temperature is also critical for white shrimp P. vannamei.
Extreme temperature fluctuations might lower immune resistance, increasing vulner-
ability to Vibrio infection (Cheng et al. 2005). Since many viral infections in shrimp are
affected by temperature, it is advisable to maintain water temperature at around 29 °C or
higher, especially to control viruses involved in white spot syndrome (Lim et al. 2021).
In BFT, the optimal temperature range for shrimp is around 30 °C (27–33 °C for giant
freshwater prawn, 28–30 °C for Pacific white shrimp, and 28–32 °C for the giant tiger
prawn). However, shrimp can endure lower temperatures at the cost of growth. A study
by de Souza et al. (2016) found the best results at 27 °C, with shrimp showing superior
growth and reduced oxidative stress. Tilapia can survive in cold conditions (< 5 °C), but
will not feed at < 15 °C (Crab et al. 2009). Similar temperature preferences are observed
in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus), channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), and milk-
fish (Chanos chanos). On the other hand, species like gray mullet (Mugil cephalus) and
common carp (Cyprinus carpio) thrive below 30 °C, but require temperatures above
20 °C (Bagi et al. 2023).
Tables 2 and 3 provide detailed information on the suitable temperature ranges for
shrimp and tilapia, and the impact of varying water temperatures on biofloc system
13
9356 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
performance and the cultivated species. A study by Ponce-Palafox et al. (2019) observed
a decrease in pH with rising temperatures in BFT shrimp aquaculture, particularly
at 32 °C, mirroring results from similar research in the past (Hostins et al. 2015; de
Souza et al. 2016). Additionally, at 32 °C, there tends to be an increase in TAN, nitrites,
nitrates, TSS, and SS, aligning with findings from the literature (de Souza et al. 2014;
Hostins et al. 2015).
pH and alkalinity
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9357
Salinity
Salinity range can play a major role in biofloc development and impact the microbial com-
munity (Maicá et al. 2014). Table 2 shows the most common values of salinity in BFT,
where its optimal levels are species-specific. Table 3 shows the effects of different salini-
ties on the characteristics of BFT systems and cultured species. For instance, Hakanson
(2006) observed a trend for suspended particle aggregation and floc size to increase with
higher salinity. Studies conducted by Maicá et al. (2012) and Khanjani et al. (2020a) with
P. vannamei indicate a progressive increase in biofloc levels (settling solids), reaching its
peak at elevated salinity levels. The same trend was observed by Decamp et al. (2003) also
highlighting a decrease in pH at higher salinity (36 g/L) in comparison to lower salinity
treatments (18 and 9 g/L) in zero-water-exchange P. vannamei juvenile culture. According
to the authors, this phenomenon is attributed to enhanced photosynthetic activity at lower
salinities. This trend was also noted by Maicá et al. (2012) with P. vannamei biofloc-based
13
9358 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
culture where higher biofloc levels were observed at 25 g/L, leading to lower pH as a result
of high microbial respiration (Wasielesky et al. 2006a).
Several studies also highlighted that salinity changes in water can also impact the meat
nutritional quality (Huang et al. 2004; Khanjani et al. 2020a; 2020b).
In BFT, Khanjani et al. (2020a) demonstrated an increase in dry matter, protein, lipid,
and ash in shrimp corroborated with rising salinity. The relationship between protein con-
tent and salinity was further investigated by Liang et al. (2008) and Maicá et al. (2014).
Maicá et al. (2014) reported higher ash and lipid content in shrimp at higher salinities,
emphasizing the influence of biofloc-based culture on shrimp biochemistry, as indicated
by elevated ash and lipid levels in no-exchange treatments compared to controls. Khanjani
et al. (2020a) observed elevated biofloc protein content at higher salinity levels. However,
Ju et al. (2008) and Maicá et al. (2014) reported elevated protein levels at minimum salin-
ity. With the increase in salinity, a decrease in biofloc lipid content was noted, with the
highest and lowest levels respectively observed at 10 and 32 g/L (Khanjani et al. 2020a).
Biofloc ash content was also directly correlated with salinity (Maicá et al. 2014), the same
trend corroborated by Ju et al. (2008), who reported ash percentages of 18.3 and 40.7% at
5 and 32 g/L, respectively. Valenzuela-Jiménez et al. (2022) conducted a comprehensive
study on the effect of low (3 g/L) and high (35 g/L) salinities on oxygen consumption, per-
formance, oxidative stress, and antioxidant activity in outdoor BFT culture of Litopenaeus
setiferus. The study revealed improved feed utilization and FCR with higher salinity and
reduced weight gain and survival in low salinity. The poor performance in low salinity is
attributed to the unbalanced ionic composition and nitrite toxicity (Soares de Moura et al.
2021).
Suitable DO level is an important factor for proper development of bioflocs (De Schryver
et al. 2008). Studies indicated a correlation between DO and the growth and densification
of bioflocs (Wilen and Balmer 1999). Suboptimal settling characteristics in bioflocs were
found at reduced DO (0.5–2.0 mg/L), evidenced by an SVI of 250 mL/g. In contrast, a
higher DO (2.0–5.0 mg/L) reduces SVI to approximately 100 mL/g (Phulia et al. 2012).
However, it is possible for bioflocs with larger SVI to develop under diminished DO condi-
tions. For instance, these bioflocs can be consumed by the cultured species before the bio-
flocs settle to the bottom (Khanjani and Sharifinia 2024). Nonetheless, culture conditions
with high concentration of suspended particles (bioflocs) can obstruct the gill structures of
fish and shrimp (Emerenciano et al. 2013).
BFT with shared environment of cultured animals and microbials (bioflocs) can face
substantial oxygen demand (Yu et al. 2023a, b). Especially in intensive farming systems,
shrimp and fish typically require high DO levels, normally exceeding 5 mg/L (Patkaew
et al. 2024). A culture medium with high biofloc concentration can significantly elevate
the demand for oxygen, occasionally surpassing the requirements of cultured species them-
selves (Raza et al. 2024). In addition, the oxygen requirements can differ between in situ
and ex situ biofloc systems. The DO demand in in situ systems relates to the sum of cul-
tured species and bioflocs requirements, whereas in ex-situ systems where bioflocs are
formed externally in a decoupled biological reactor, the primarily oxygen demand relates to
the microbial communities (Ulloa-Walker et al., 2020). In this sense, in biological reactors,
a minimal DO requirement of 1 mg/L can address the needs of biofloc organisms (Kuhn
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9359
and Lawrence 2012). For effective in situ and ex situ operations, the biofloc facility must
incorporate emergency power sources to counteract potential power outages, as inadequate
aeration can swiftly lead to critically low DO levels and mortalities (Vinatea et al. 2009).
Vinatea et al. (2009) found that in the absence of aeration, a DO concentration of 4.1 mg/L
could plummet to a critical level (0.65 mg/L) within 31.8 and 34.7 min in superintensive
(610 shrimp/m2) P. vannamei culture, depending on the presence or absence of light. Their
subsequent study (Vinatea et al. 2010) revealed a higher oxygen consumption rate in super-
intensive BFT shrimp culture under illuminated conditions up to 20 min after aeration was
stopped, at which point the dark condition had higher oxygen consumption. To enhance
DO and aeration efficiency in BFT systems, several aeration devices have been evaluated,
including paddle-wheels, venturis-nozzles, blowers with diffusers, submerged double helix
aerators, and mixed combinations (Pasco 2015; Piñeros-Roldan et al. 2020). The suitable
device or combination in BFT will depend on cultured species selection (e.g., shrimp or
fish), phase (nursery or grow-out), tank and pond design, and water depth, among other
characteristics (Piñeros-Roldan et al. 2020).
TSS and SS are examples of critical water quality parameters utilized for assessing bio-
floc concentrations in culture conditions (Soaudy et al. 2023). However, depending on the
method selected, accuracy and time consumption can vary drastically. This can be partially
solved as some studies reveal correlation among SS, TSS, water transparency, and turbid-
ity (Ray et al. 2010a, b; Schveitzer et al. 2013; Khanjani et al. 2021), meaning more cost-
effective ways to monitor the biofloc concentrations.
The optimal values of SS and TSS for biofloc systems are presented in Tables 2 and 3.
It is important to note that optimal TSS ranges can vary by species. For instance, Avni-
melech (2012) recommends 200–400 mg/L for tilapia. Hatem et al. (2013) recommend a
maximum TSS range of 220–250 mg/L for tilapia to avoid gill clogging, but higher levels
may be detrimental for earlier tilapia stages (or nursery phase) as highlighted by Emer-
enciano et al. (2017). In contrast, Poli et al. (2015) observed no significant variation in
Rhamdia quelen fish larvae survival across a TSS range of 200–1000 mg/L, indicating
the animals’ tolerance to high biofloc environments. Fingerling stage (5.7–10.2 g) of red
cachama (Piaractus brachypomus) tolerates TSS levels ranging from 384 to 645 mg/L
with survival rates between 84 and 99% (Ueno-Fukura et al. 2019). Similar levels were
found by Angeles-Escobar et al. (2022) for the same species with levels ranging from 200
to 600 mg/L; however, optimal performance was achieved at TSS = 200–300 mg/L. For
fish, species, phase of culture, and natural conditions in the wild seem to have impact on
the animal’s ability to tolerate high TSS levels in culture conditions. For marine shrimp,
the literature is more abundant regarding TSS and its impact on performance, water qual-
ity, and health. The most common range of TSS maintained in biofloc systems for shrimp
is between 400 and 600 mg/L (Avnimelech 2012; Gaona et al. 2011; Samocha et al. 2007;
Schveitzer et al. 2013). Higher TSS levels have been associated with negative performance
of P. vannamei (Vinatea et al. 2010; Schveitzer et al. 2013). Studies suggest that TSS levels
below 600 mg/L are most suitable for shrimp farming in biofloc systems (Ray et al. 2010a,
b; Schveitzer et al. 2013). Regarding P. vannamei nauplii, Liu et al. (2022) recommend
TSS level < 300 mg/L to achieve improved performance in larviculture. TSS can also have
a key impact on water quality parameters. Ray et al. (2011) found that at TSS = 200 mg/L,
nitrite and nitrate levels are lower while ammonium and phosphate levels are higher
13
9360 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
compared to TSS = 300 mg/L. In the same study, the growth rate was also higher (1.7 g/
week) at 200 mg/L than at 300 mg/L (1.3 g/week), and at TSS = 800–1000 mg/L, shrimp
experienced poor growth and significant gill obstruction. The authors suggested that lack
of suitable substrates for nitrifying bacteria, rapid denitrification in settling chambers, or
algal nitrate assimilation can have a severe impact on N-compounds fluctuations (Ray et al.
2011). In the same context, Schveitzer et al. (2013) recommend maintaining TSS between
200 and 600 mg/L for optimal growth and system stability. According to both studies, low
TSS conditions exhibited faster shrimp growth and enhanced environment conditions,
highlighting the role of biofloc concentrations on nitrogen cycling. In addition, maintaining
TSS in suitable conditions helps the functionality of biofloc systems, emphasizing the bal-
ance between bacterial oxygen demand and system productivity (Hargreaves 2013).
Throughout the culture cycle, TSS tends to increase if not properly managed (e.g., use
of clarifiers; Ray et al. 2011; Gaona et al. 2011). Higher TSS levels can decrease DO, pH,
alkalinity, and ammonia, but promoting nitrate accumulation (Avnimelech 2012; Gaona
et al. 2017). Furtado et al. (2011) also observed that changes in pH and alkalinity can
impact TSS levels. However, saturated culture conditions with high TSS levels may also
result in higher nitrite concentrations (Samocha et al. 2007; Luo et al. 2013). The addi-
tion of external organic carbon sources can help reduce ammonia levels (Lin and Chen
2001), but unlikely to control nitrite levels especially in high TSS conditions with DO, pH,
and alkalinity fluctuations. Suitable ranges of these parameters are critical to ensure proper
chemoautotrophic bacteria metabolism, especially nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (Ebeling et al.
2006b). Low levels of TSS may result in a more stable culture environment, avoiding trig-
gered competition for DO, micronutrients, and space by heterotrophic and chemoauto-
trophic (nitrifying) bacteria (Luo et al. 2013).
In terms of practicality, SS is considered a cost-effective way to measure solids concen-
tration in BFT, especially in commercial operations (Avnimelech 2012). Lim et al. (2021)
in a 70-day P. vannamei culture cycle reported insignificant SS in the first 30 days, fol-
lowed by a significant increase during days 35–70. Low SS levels have been suggested to
enhance the overall biofloc conditions and system stability (Lim et al. 2021).
The red-bellied pacu (Piaractus brachypomus) has demonstrated a notable toler-
ance to varying levels of SS. In juvenile stages (33.5–182.6 g), SS concentrations of
56.6 ± 20.7 mL/L were tolerated (Brú-Cordero et al. 2017). The tolerance of different SS
levels may be species-phase related, having impact on other water quality parameters, ani-
mal performance, and health.
Nitrogenous compounds
Nitrogen, an essential element for all living organisms, is supplied through dietary pro-
teins which are digested and used to synthesize various biomolecules (Wei et al. 2016).
Nitrogen accounts for approximately 5% of an organisms’ dry weight (Sigee 2005). Within
aquatic ecosystems, nitrogen exists in both organic and inorganic forms. Organic nitrogen
is primarily derived from residual feed, animal waste, dead matter, and urea. In contrast,
inorganic nitrogen encompasses ammonia and ammonium (NH3/NH4+), nitrite (NO2−),
nitrate (NO3−), and to a lesser extent, nitrogen gas (N2) (Jiménez-Ojeda et al. 2018). In
aquatic environments, especially BFT conditions, heterotrophic bacteria and protozoa
are critical organisms capable of utilizing undissolved nitrogen (Sigee 2005) sourced by
organic matter continuously added to the systems. Understanding the different nitrogen
pathways, acting microorganisms and suitable compounds ranges are key for proper water
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9361
quality maintenance and decision-making in BFT (Khanjani et al. 2022). Some of these
compounds can be highly toxic (e.g., N H3 and NO2−), and poor water quality management
can lead to system collapse and high mortality rates (Lin et al. 2023). At high concentra-
tions, these compounds may impair oxygen transport and induce gill irritations and lesions,
as well as lead to hypoxia, enzymatic dysfunctions, and impair T4 hormone production
(Abakari et al. 2021).
Table 2 presents suitable nitrogen compound concentrations in biofloc systems for dif-
ferent species and Table 4 presents the microorganisms involved in the removal of nitrog-
enous compounds in BFT. The successful operation of BFT largely hinges on the effective
management of water quality, especially conversion of harmful nitrogenous compounds.
In a stable BFT environment, parameters such as ammonia and nitrite must be maintained
within acceptable ranges and continuously converted into benign compounds and biomass
through microbial processes (Khanjani et al. 2022). Ebeling et al. (2006a) and Khanjani
et al. (2022) present a stoichiometric framework for nitrogen removal in BFT while con-
sidering microbial growth and metabolic kinetics. The framework provides information
on substrate requirements, biomass production, and the outcomes of primary nitrogen
removal pathways, namely algal assimilation, autotrophic nitrification, and heterotrophic
assimilation.
Algal assimilation is often the predominant pathway for nitrogen removal in outdoor
BFT systems, with continuous light exposure (Zemor et al. 2019). On the other hand, in
conditions where photosynthetic activity is suppressed (e.g., using shading or indoor envi-
ronments), chemoautotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic assimilation are considered
the prevalent pathways for nitrogen removal (Avnimelech 2012; Samocha et al., 2017).
Algae assimilate C O2 into organic carbon, and ammonia is directly incorporated into algal
biomass. Normally, the need for external organic carbon supplementation is reduced,
except to promote mixotrophic growth (Cecchin et al. 2018), and fluctuations of alkalinity
and pH are less common while nitrogen is assimilated during photosynthesis (Mohsenpour
et al. 2021). However, in these systems, there is a risk of algal population crashes, abruptly
releasing nitrogen back into the water ( NO2 spikes) and causing sudden mortalities (Samo-
cha et al. 2017). In these systems, aeration and mixing are still needed to maintain optimal
DO.
In more controlled shaded or indoor BFT culture conditions, ammonia oxidation fol-
lowed by nitrite oxidation (nitrifying bacteria) and ammonia assimilation by hetero-
trophic bacteria were found as main pathways for toxic N-compounds control (Khanjani
et al. 2024c). In addition, denitrification, transforming nitrate into N 2 (Samocha 2019),
and integrated systems using plants (Pinho et al. 2022) are also presented as potential tool
to prevent N accumulation in BFT (Deng et al. 2020; Rajta et al. 2020). Nitrification via
Table 4 Microorganisms involved in the removal of nitrogenous compounds in the biofloc system (Ebeling
et al. 2006a; Jiménez-Ojeda et al. 2018; Khanjani et al. 2022)
Heterotrophic Chemoautotrophic Photoautotrophic
13
9362 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
chemoautotrophic bacteria produces nitrate while minimal biomass is added to bioflocs due
to the slow growth of nitrifying microorganisms. In heterotrophic pathway, proper organic
carbon management is mandatory, both requiring substantial aeration and alkalinity/pH
control (Khanjani et al. 2024b). Collectively, these processes offer BFT operators various
strategies to manage harmful nitrogenous compounds (Leong et al. 2021; Roy et al. 2019).
Emerenciano et al. (2022a) bring a comprehensive review summarizing several intensive
penaeid systems including biofloc technology and similar microbial-based systems (e.g.,
Synbiotics, Aquamimicry, semi-biofloc). The authors highlighted the role of the different
microbial-based farming techniques, and its direct effect on microbial pathway and ulti-
mately nitrogen removal. Therefore, the selection and management of culture conditions
are directly linked to N-compounds management in BFT-based aquaculture.
Phosphate
Monitoring and maintaining phosphate (PO43−) levels in aquaculture systems is crucial for
recirculation management and effluent discharge. Due to its limited water exchange condi-
tion, in BFT, phosphate tends to accumulate over time; however, it can vary according to
the biofloc approach and culture conditions (Emerenciano et al. 2022b). Lim et al. (2021)
found a direct correlation between phosphate levels, time, and TSS in BFT. High (PO43−)
levels may cause reduction in N:P ratio, leading to cyanobacteria outbreaks and less prev-
alence of desirable photosynthetic organisms such as chlorophytes and diatoms (Smith
1983). In a healthy and stable BFT, these groups should be prevalent in the phytoplank-
ton assemblage, known as key phosphate consumers. Unlike nitrogen, phosphorus does not
volatilize, so the forms present in water include organic forms and residual orthophosphate
(Silva et al. 2013).
Luo et al. (2014) observed lower phosphate concentrations in BFT systems compared
to RAS systems, suggesting active microbial phosphate cycling in bioflocs. Ray and Lotz
(2014) also reported reduced phosphate levels, attributing this to uptake by algae and het-
erotrophic bacteria, as corroborated by Longnecker et al. (2010) and Liu et al. (2018).
Feed input directly influences phosphate levels (Montoya et al. 2000). Feed and animal
waste are the primary sources of phosphorus in water (Barak et al. 2003). In BFT systems,
P. vannamei can incorporate up to 35% of the system’s total phosphorus intake, with the
remaining phosphorus existing in dissolved and particulate forms (Silva et al. 2013). How-
ever, fish and shrimp are normally resistant to phosphate concentrations, as shown by the
absence of reports of phosphate toxicity (Silva et al. 2013). Due to its limited literature,
there is a need for more R&D to better elucidate the phosphate role in BFT-based culture
conditions.
Heavy metals (HMs) are a group of naturally occurring elements with high atomic weight
that are often toxic to humans and animals (Mitra et al. 2022). These elements can enter
aquaculture systems through various sources, including feed, water, sediment, and air
(Hossain et al. 2023a). Once in the system, HMs can accumulate in the tissues of fish and
other aquatic organisms, and may pose a health risk to consumers. There is little infor-
mation regarding BFT-based aquaculture and heavy metals. There is evidence that BFT
systems are capable of removing HMs from the culture environment (Deswati et al. 2022;
Habib et al. 2023a; 2023b). In O. niloticus culture, Habib et al. (2023b) found that BFT
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9363
was effective in removing HMs (Cu, Cd, Zn, Pb, and Cr) with lower concentrations com-
pared to an earthen pond system. In an integrated tilapia (O. niloticus) and Samhong mus-
tard (Brassica juncea L.) biofloc-based culture, Deswati et al. (2022) observed a notable
reduction in Cu levels on day of culture (DOC) 42 onwards. The authors suggested that
biofloc-based aquaponics may mitigate metal concentrations via microbial activity and
plant absorption while preserving water quality (Deswati et al. 2022). In terms of micro-
bial community, cyanobacteria are a type of bacteria typically found in both freshwater
and marine BFT-based aquaculture (Khanjani et al. 2022). These microbes can produce
extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) able to foster particle aggregation (bioflocs),
bind to HMs, and act as a carrier throughout the system (Lama et al. 2016). The sus-
pended particles (bioflocs) can now be easily removed utilizing settling chambers (Ray
et al. 2011; Gaona et al. 2011). In a study by Bender et al. (1991 and 1994), the cyano-
bacterium Oscillatoria sp. was shown to be effective at removing a variety of HMs from
water, including Mn, Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, Co, Cr, and Fe. The authors observed that HM lev-
els in water treated with Oscillatoria sp. was significantly lower than those in untreated
water.
As per HMs, there is also limited information regarding BFT-based aquaculture systems
and microplastics. Microplastics (MPs) are plastic particles < 5 mm and present a consider-
able challenge in the field of aquaculture. MPs have been observed in a range of aquacul-
ture settings, including aquaculture ponds (Ma et al. 2020), rice-fish co-culture systems (Lv
et al. 2019), estuarine aquaculture areas (Liu et al. 2023), RAS systems (Lu et al. 2019),
and BFT systems (Hu et al. 2023). In koi carp culture, accumulative MP uptake can lead to
severe consequences, including reduced feed intake and potential starvation (Ouyang et al.
2021). MPs have been also shown to interfere with digestive enzymes, trigger the release
of immune cytokine digestive tract in guppy fish (Huang et al. 2020), cause behavioral
changes, affect energy reserves and food composition, and disrupt liver function in guppy
(Lai et al. 2021; Yin et al. 2018). In addition, MP infiltration into fish muscle tissue is also
important from a consumer health perspective (Yang et al. 2020; Zitouni et al. 2020) as
MPs may impact human health (Hossain et al. 2023b).
As MP pollution in aquaculture has garnered increasing attention in recent years, BFT
may emerge as a promising mitigation strategy (Hossain et al. 2023b; Meng et al. 2023),
especially due to its rich microbial biodiversity (Hu et al. 2023). The exponential growth
of diverse microbial population including fungi, protozoa, and bacteria (Khanjani et al.
2022) may enable a fast MP decomposition (Abakari et al. 2022). These microorganisms
can break down the plastic into smaller molecules, which can then be further degraded by
other processes (Li et al. 2022; Wu et al. 2022). The study found that the bioflocculants
produced by Bacillus enclensis had a flocculating activity of 93%, and they were able to
reduce microplastic pollution by up to 80% (Shukri et al. 2022). Amini et al. (2022) found
that a variety of bacteria, including Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., and Vibrio sp., have
been shown to be able to degrade microplastics. In addition, biodegradation of microplas-
tics was observed in Pseudomonas sp. MB4 at a rate of 20% per day (Huang et al. 2022a),
Bacillus cereus B-1 at a rate of 10% per day (Li et al. 2022), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
B-3 at a rate of 15% per day (Wu et al. 2022), both groups commonly present in BFT aqua-
culture conditions. Those rates can be affected by numerous factors, such as the type of
plastic, the concentration of bacteria/fungi, and the environmental conditions (Amini et al.
2022; Meng et al. 2023).
In BFT systems, Hu et al. (2023) examined the impact of polystyrene particles with
32–40 µm diameter range in Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) cultivation for 28 days. The study
revealed that exposure to 0.80 and 800 particles/L did not affect water quality (including
13
9364 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
nitrification), water (biofloc) and gut microbial communities, tilapia growth, or digestive
enzyme activity. However, changes in crude protein and lipid content were observed, as
well as an increase in the hepato-somatic index, suggesting potential interference with liver
digestive absorption. The authors revealed that MPs were not detectable in tilapia feces
from day 16. The highest concentration of MPs was found in the liver followed by the gills,
while microparticles were not observed in muscle tissue. These studies may indicate that
BFT microorganisms may tolerate water containing MPs without affecting water quality,
animal performance, nitrification, and other key microbial properties. It may also help to
degrade MPs, thereby presenting a promising area for future research into MP remediation.
However, due to its limitation, further toxicological studies are needed to better illustrate
the role of BFT aiming to overcome MPs challenges in aquaculture (Wei et al. 2021, 2022).
The present review emphasizes the importance of proper water quality management in
BFT, and to maintain key parameters such as N-compounds, temperature, salinity, TSS,
SS, pH, DO, and alkalinity in optimal levels. Routine monitoring, interpretation, and inter-
vention are essential to sustain a desirable environment, animal welfare, health and perfor-
mance. There is still a lack of understanding related to water quality and BFT, especially
in commercial biofloc-based shrimp and fish operations. Developing a comprehensive bib-
liometric analysis, this review intended to combine relevant water quality literature in fish
and shrimp biofloc systems, and support decision-making to improve farming operations.
In the future, BFT is expected to play a major role as suitable technology for pond water
quality management. The present study underscores the importance of understanding the
complex interactions within BFT systems and the potential of bioflocs to mitigate the envi-
ronmental impacts, including HMs and MPs.
Author contributions Mohammad Hossein Khanjani, Alireza Mohammadi, Maurício Gustavo Coelho Eme-
renciano wrote the main manuscript text.
Mohammad Hossein Khanjani, Alireza Mohammadi, Maurício Gustavo Coelho Emerenciano prepared
figures and tables.
Mohammad Hossein Khanjani, Alireza Mohammadi, Maurício Gustavo Coelho Emerenciano reviewed
the manuscript.
Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.
References
Abakari G, Luo G, Kombat EO (2021) Dynamics of nitrogenous compounds and their control in biofloc
technology (BFT) systems: a review. Aquac Fish 6:441–447
Abakari G, Wu X, He X, Fan L, Luo G (2022) Bacteria in biofloc technology aquaculture systems: roles and
mediating factors. Rev Aquacult 14(3):1260–1284
Ahammed MB, Momin A, Sultana S, Sarkar A (2022) pH and temperature monitoring with a GSM-based
auto feeding system of a biofloc technology. Int J Sci Eng Res 13(4):270–274
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9365
Alkhamis YA, Sultana A, Arafat ST, Rouf MA, Rahman SM, Mathew RT, Ganesan N, Sultana A,
Alngada RS, Whed RA, Aljaafari NB, Rahman MM (2023) The impact of biofloc technology on
water quality in aquaculture: a systematic meta-analysis. Aquac Nutr 2023:9915874
Amini M, Dehghani M, Rostami S, Ghanbari M (2022) Biodegradation of microplastics by marine bac-
teria: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 163:111756
Angeles-Escobar BE, da Silva SMBC, Severi W (2022) Growth, red blood cells, and gill alterations of
red pacu (Piaractus brachypomus) fingerlings by chronic exposure to different total suspended sol-
ids in biofloc. J World Aquac Soc 53(3):652–668
Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J
Informetr 11(4):959–975
Arnosti C, Jørgensen BB, Sagemann JBT (1998) Temperature dependence of microbial degradation of
organic matter in marine sediments: polysaccharide hydrolysis, oxygen consumption, and sulfate
reduction. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 165:59–70
Avnimelech Y (2012) Biofloc technology-a practical guide book, 2nd edn. The World Aquaculture Soci-
ety, Baton Rouge, USA, p 272
Azim ME, Little DC (2008) The bioflocs technology (BFT) in in- door tanks: water quality, bio-
flocs composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture
283:29–35
Azim ME, Little DC, Bron J (2008) Microbial protein production in activated suspension tanks manipu-
lating C: N ratio in feed and the implications for fish culture. Bioresour Technol 99(9):3590–3599
Bagi A, Poersch LH, Ravagnan E (2023) A desktop study on biofloc technology. NORCE Climate and
Environment, 41
Barak Y, Cytryn E, Gelfand I, Krom M, Van Rijn J (2003) Phosphorus removal in a prototype, recircu-
lating aquaculture system. Aquaculture 220:313–326
Bender J, Gould JP, Vatcharapijarn Y, Saha G (1991) Uptake, transformation and fixation of Se (VI) by a
mixed, selenium tolerant ecosystem. Water Air Soil Pollut 59:359–367
Bender H, Rodriguez-Eatun S, Ekanemesang U, Phillips P (1994) Characterization of metal-binding bio-
flocculants produced by the cyanobacterial component of mixed microbial mats. Appl Environ
Microbiol 60:2311–2315
Boyd CE, Tucker CS, Somridhivej B (2016) Alkalinity and hardness: critical but elusive concepts in
aquaculture. J World Aquacult Soc 47(1):6–41
Browdy C, Ray AJ, Leffler JW, Avnimelech Y (2012) Biofloc-based aquaculture systems. In: Tidwell JH
(ed) Aquaculture production systems, 1st edn. Jhon Wiley and Sons, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA,
pp 278–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118250105.ch12
Brú-Cordero SB, Pertúz-Buelvas VM, Ayazo-Genes JE, Atencio-García VJ, Pardo-Carrasco SC (2017)
Bicultivo en biofloc de cachama blanca -Piaractus brachypomus-y tilapia nilotica - Oreochromis
niloticus- alimentadas con dietas de origen vegetal. Rev Med Vet Zoot 64(1):44–60
Carballeira Braña CB, Cerbule K, Senff P, Stolz IK (2021) Towards environmental sustainability in
marine finfish aquaculture. Front Mar Sci 8:666662
Carvalho A, Costa LCdO, Holanda M, Poersch LH, Turan G (2023) Influence of total suspended solids
on the growth of the sea lettuce Ulva lactuca integrated with the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus
vannamei in a biofloc system. Fishes 8:163
Cecchin M, Benfatto S, Griggio F, Mori A, Cazzaniga S, Vitulo N, Delledonne M, Ballottari M (2018)
Molecular basis of autotrophic vs mixotrophic growth in Chlorella sorokiniana. Sci Rep 8:6465
Chen S, Ling J, Blancheton JP (2006) Nitrification kinetics of biofilm as affected by water quality fac-
tors. Aquac Eng 34:179–197
Chen Y, Li S, Fang F, Guo J, Zhang Q, Gao X (2012) Effect of inorganic carbon on the completely
autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite (CANON) process in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor.
Environ Technol 33(22):2611–2617
Chen X, Luo G, Tan J, Tan H, Yao M (2020) Effects of carbohydrate supply strategies and biofloc con-
centrations on the growth performance of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) cultured in biofloc
systems. Aquaculture 517:734808
Cheng W, Wang LU, Chen JC (2005) Effect of water temperature on the immune response of white
shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei to Vibrio alginolyticus. Aquaculture 250(3–4):592–601
Cheng CH, Guo ZX, Luo SW, Wang AL (2018) Effects of high temperature on biochemical parameters,
oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis of pufferfish (Takifugu obscurus). Ecotoxicol Envi-
ron Saf 150:190–198
Crab R, Kochva M, Verstraete W, Avnimelech Y (2009) Bioflocs technology application in over-winter-
ing of tilapia. Aquacult Eng 40:105–112
13
9366 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
da Silveira LGP, Krummenauer D, Poersch LH, Rosas VT, Wasielesky W (2020) Hyperintensive stock-
ing densities for Litopenaeus vannamei grow-out in biofloc technology culture system. J World
Aquac Soc 51(6):290–1300
Das RR, Panigrahi A, Sarkar S, Saravanan A, Biju IF, Ambikanandham K, Jayanthi M, Kannappan S
(2023) Growth, survival, and immune potential of post larvae of Indian white shrimp, Penaeus
indicus (H. Milne Edwards, 1937) in different salinities with biofloc system (BFT) during nursery
phase. Aquacult Int 31:273–293
Day SB, Salie K, Stander HB (2016) A growth comparison among three commercial tilapia species in a
biofloc system. Aquacult Int 24:1309–1322
de Alvarenga ER, Alves GFDO, Fernandes AFA, Costa GR, da Silva MA, Teixeira E, Turra EM (2018)
Moderate salinities enhance growth performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) finger-
lings in the biofloc system. Aquacult Res 49(9):2919–2926
De Schryver P, Crab R, Defoirdt T, Boon N, Verstraete W (2008) The basics of bioflocs technology: the
added value for aquaculture. Aquaculture 277:125–137
de Souza DM, Martins AC, Jensen L, Wasielesky W, Monserrat JM, Garcia L (2014) Effect of tempera-
ture on antioxidant enzymatic activity in the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in a BFT
(Biofloc technology) system. Mar Fresh Behav Phy 47(1):1–10
de Souza DM, Borges VD, Furtado P, Romano LA, Wasielesky W, Monserrat JM, Garcia LO (2016)
Antioxidant enzyme activities and immunological system analysis of Litopenaeus vannamei reared
in biofloc technology (BFT) at different water temperatures. Aquaculture 451:436–443
de Souza RL, de Lima ECR, de Melo FP, Ferreira MGP, Correia E (2019) The culture of Nile tilapia at
different salinities using a biofloc system. Rev Ciênc Agron 50:267–275
Deb S, Noori MT, Rao PS (2020) Application of biofloc technology for Indian major carp culture (poly-
culture) along with water quality management. Aquacult Eng 91:102106
Decamp O, Cody J, Conquest L, Delanoy G, Tacon AG (2003) Effect of salinity on natural community
and production of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone), within experimental zero-water exchange cul-
ture systems. Aquacult Res 34(4):345–355
Deng M, Dai Z, Senbati Y, Li L, Song K, He X (2020) Aerobic denitrification microbial community and
function in zero-discharge recirculating aquaculture system using a single biofloc-based suspended
growth reactor: influence of the carbon-to nitrogen ratio. Front Microbiol 11:1760
Deng Y, Borewicz K, van Loo J, Olabarrieta MZ, Kokou F, Sipkema D, Verdegem MCJ (2022) In-situ
biofloc affects the core prokaryotes community composition in gut and enhances growth of Nile
tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Microb Ecol 84(3):879–892
Deswati D, Khairiyah K, Safni S, Yusuf Y, Refinel R, Pardi H (2022) Environmental detoxification of
heavy metals in flood & drain aquaponic system based on biofloc technology. Int J Environ Anal
Chem 102(18):7155–7164
Dilmi A, Refes W, Meknachi A (2022) Effects of C/n ratio on water quality, growth performance, diges-
tive enzyme activity and antioxidant status of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)
in biofloc based culture system. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 22(1):TRJFAS19754
dos Santos DKM, Kojima JT, Santana TM, de Castro DP, Serra PT, Dantas NSM, da Fonseca FAL,
Mariúba LAM, Gonçalves LU (2020) Farming tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) in static
clear water versus a biofloc system with or without Bacillus subtilis supplementation. Aquac Int
29:207–218
Ebeling JM, Timmons MB, Bisogni JJ (2006a) An engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of auto-
trophic, heterotrophic bacterial control of ammonia–nitrogen in zero-exchange production. In:
Rakestraw, T.T., Douglas, L.S., Marsh, L., Granata, L., Correa, A., Flick, G.J. (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 6th International Conference on Recirculation Aquaculture. Roanoke, VA, pp. 28–37.
Ebeling JM, Timmons MB, Bisogni JJ (2006b) Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of photoau-
totrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal of ammonia–nitrogen in aquaculture systems.
Aquaculture 257(1–4):346–358
Eid AE, Khloud G, Mervat AM, Amal E (2021) Effect of reuse biofloc water on growth performance, feed
utilization of Nile tilapia fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus). Egypt J Nut Feed 24(2):315–326
Ekasari J, Rivandi DR, Firdausi AP, Surawidjaja EH, Zairin M Jr, Bossier P, De Schryver P (2015) Bio-
floc technology positively affects Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) larvae performance. Aqua-
culture 441:72–77
El-Sayed AFM (2021) Use of biofloc technology in shrimp aquaculture: a comprehensive review, with
emphasis on the last decade. Rev Aquacult 13:676–705
Emerenciano MGC, Ballester ELC, Cavalli RO, Wasielesky W (2012) Biofloc technology application as
a food source in a limited water exchange nursery system for pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasil-
iensis (Latreille, 1817). Aquac Res 43(3):447–457
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9367
Emerenciano MGC, Gaxiola G, Cuzon G (2013) Biofloc technology (BFT): a review for aquaculture
application and animal food industry. In Biomass now - Cultivation and utilization (pp. 301–328.
Chap. 12). INTECH. https://doi.org/10.5772/53902.
Emerenciano MGC, Martínez-Córdova LR, Martínez-Porchas M, Miranda-Baeza A (2017) Biofloc tech-
nology (BFT): a tool for water quality management in aquaculture. Water Quality. InTech, Lon-
don, UK, pp 91–109
Emerenciano MGC, Miranda-Baeza A, Martínez-Porchas M, Poli MA, Vieira FdN (2021) Biofloc tech-
nology (BFT) in shrimp farming: past and present shaping the future. Front Mar Sci 8: https://doi.
org/10.3389/fmars.2021.813091
Emerenciano MGC, Arnold S, Perrin T (2022a) Sodium metasilicate supplementation in culture water
on growth performance, water quality and economics of indoor commercial-scale biofloc-based
Litopenaeus vannamei culture. Aquaculture 560:738566
Emerenciano MGC, Rombenso AN, Vieira FN, Martins MA, Coman GJ, Truong HH, Noble TH, Simon
CJ (2022b) Intensification of penaeid shrimp culture: an applied review of advances in production
systems, nutrition and breeding. Animals 12:236
FAO (2024) In brief to the state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2024. Blue transformation in action,
Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd0690en
Fleckenstein LJ, Tierney TW, Ray AJ (2018) Comparing biofloc, clear-water, and hybrid recirculating
nursery systems (Part II): Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) production and water quality dynamics.
Aquacult Eng 82:80–85
Furtado PS, Poersch LH, JrW W (2011) Effect of calcium hydroxide, carbonate and sodium bicarbonate
on water quality and zootechnical performance of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei reared in bioflocs
technology (BFT) systems. Aquaculture 321(1–2):130–135
Furtado PS, Poersch LH, Wasielesky W (2015) The effect of different alkalinity levels on Litopenaeus
vannamei reared with biofloc technology (BFT). Aquacult Int 23(1):345–358
Gao H, Huang FY, Wang ZP (2018) Research trends of macrophage polarization: a bibliometric analy-
sis. Chin Med J 131(24):2968–2975
Gaona CAP, Poersch LH, Krummenauer D, Foes GK, Wasielesky W (2011) The effect of solids removal
on water quality, growth and survival of Litopenaeus vannamei in a biofloc technology culture
system. Int J Rec Aquacult 12:54–73
Gaona CAP, Serra F, Furtado P, Poersch LH, Wasielesky W (2016) Biofloc management with differ-
ent flow rates for solids removal in the Litopenaeus vannamei BFT culture system. Aquacult Int
24:1263–1275
Gaona CAP, Souza de Almeida M, Viau V, Poersch LH, Wasielesky W (2017) Effect of different total
suspended solids levels on a Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) BFT culture system during bio-
floc formation. Aquacult Res 48:1070–1079
Garcia LO, Becker AG, Bertuzzi T, Cunha MA, Kochhann D, Finamor IA, Riffel APK, Llesuy S,
Pavanato MA, Baldisserotto B (2011) Oxidative stress parameters in silver catfish (Rhamdia
quelen) juveniles infected with Ichthyophthirius multifiliis and maintained at different levels of
water pH. Vet Parasitol 178:15–21
García-Lillo F, Seva-Larrosa P, Sánchez-García E (2023) What is going on in entrepreneurship research?
A bibliometric and SNA analysis. J Bus Res 158:113624
Habib SS, Batool AI, Rehman MFU, Naz S (2023a) Assessment and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in
fish feeds, water, and some tissues of Cyprinus carpio cultured in different environments (biofloc
technology and earthen pond system). Biol Trace Elem Res 201:3474–3486
Habib SS, Batool AI, Rehman MFU, Naz S (2023b) Evaluation and association of heavy metals in com-
monly used fish feed with metals concentration in some tissues of O. niloticus cultured in biofloc
technology and earthen pond system. Biol Trace Elem Res 201:3006–3016
Hakanson L (2006) The relationship between salinity, suspended particulate matter and water clarity in
aquatic systems. Ecol Res 21(1):75–90
Hargreaves JA (2013) Biofloc production systems for aquaculture. In: SRAC, 4503: 8–10. Stoneville,
MS: Southern Regional Aquaculture Center. https://aquaculture.ca.uky.edu/sites/aquaculture.ca.
uky.edu/files/srac_4503_biofloc_production_systems_for_aquaculture.pdf
Hatem MH, Abdelhay YB, Alayafi AH, Suloma A (2013) Application of new strategies to reduce sus-
pended solids in zero-exchange system: I. Histological alterations in the gills of Nile tilapia. J
Appl Sci Res 9(2):1186–1192
Hossain MB, Sultana J, Pingki FH, Nur A-AU, Mia MS, Bakar MA, Yu J, Paray BA, Arai T (2023a)
Accumulation and contamination assessment of heavy metals in sediments of commercial aqua-
culture farms from a coastal area along the northern Bay of Bengal. Front Environ Sci 11:1148360
13
9368 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Hossain S, Manan H, Shukri ZNA, Othman R, Kamaruzzan AS, Rahim AIA, Khatoon H, Minhaz TM,
Islam Z, Kasan NA (2023b) Microplastics biodegradation by biofloc-producing bacteria: an inven-
tive biofloc technology approach. Microbiol Res 266:127239
Hostins B, Braga A, Lopes DLA, Wasielesky W, Poersch LH (2015) Effect of temperature on nursery and
compensatory growth of pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis reared in a super-intensive biofloc
system. Aquac Eng 66:62–67
Hu X, Meng L, Liu H, Guo Y, Liu W, Tan H, Luo G (2023) Impacts of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
exposed to microplastics in bioflocs system. Sci Total Environ 901:165921
Huang K, Wang W, Lu J, Dai XW, Zhou JN (2004) Salinity effects on growth and biochemical composition
of Penaeus vannamei. Marine Sciences-Qingdao Edition 28(9):20–25
Huang JN, Wen B, Zhu JG, Zhang YS, Gao JZ, Chen ZZ (2020) Exposure to microplastics impairs diges-
tive performance, stimulates immune response and induces microbiota dysbiosis in the gut of juvenile
guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Sci Total Environ 733:138929
Huang Y, Wu J, Zhang P, Zhang X, Wang P (2022a) Biodegradation of microplastics by a marine bacte-
rium, Pseudomonas sp. MB4. Environ Sci Tech 56(8):5638–5647
Huang HH, Li CY, Liang T, Lei YJ, Yang PH, Wu MX (2022b) Effects of carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C:N) on
water quality and growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in the biofloc system
with a salinity of 5‰. Aquacult Res 53(15):5287–5299
Islam MA, Islam SS, Bir J, Debnath P, Ullah MR, Huq KA (2023) Effect on water quality, growth perfor-
mance and economics of giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii with partial feed in
biofloc system. Aquacult Fish Fish 3(5):435–446
Jiménez E, Giménez JB, Ruano MV, Ferrer J, Serralta J (2011) Effect of pH and nitrite concentration on
nitrite oxidation rate. Bioresour Technol 102:8741–8747
Jiménez-Ojeda YK, Collazos-Lasso LF, Arias-Castellanos JA (2018) Dynamics and use of nitrogen in bio-
floc technology – BFT. AACL Bioflux 11(4):1107–1129
Johnston J, LaPara T, Behrens S (2019) Composition and dynamics of the activated sludge microbiome dur-
ing seasonal nitrification failure. Sci Rep 9:4565
Ju ZY, Forster I, Conquest L, Dominy W (2008) Enhanced growth effects on shrimp (Litopenaeus van-
namei) from inclusion of whole shrimp floc fractions to a formulated diet. Aquac Nutr 14:533–543
Kamilya D, Debbarma M, Pal P, Kheti B, Sarkar S, Singh ST (2017) Biofloc technology application in
indoor culture of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) fingerlings: the effects on inorganic nitrogen control,
growth and immunity. Chemosphere 182:8–14
Khanjani MH, Alizadeh M (2024) Effects of different salinity levels on performance of Nile tilapia finger-
lings in a biofloc culture system. Ann Anim Sci 24(1):235–245
Khanjani MH, Sharifinia M (2024) Feeding Nile tilapia with varying levels of biofloc: effect on growth
performance, survival rate, digestive and liver enzyme activities, and mucus immunity. Aquacult Int.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-024-01561-w
Khanjani MH, Alizadeh M, Sharifinia M (2020a) Rearing of the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus van-
namei in a biofloc system: the effects of different food sources and salinity levels. Aquacult Nut
26:328–337
Khanjani MH, Sharifinia M, Hajirezaee S (2020b) Effects of different salinity levels on water quality,
growth performance and body composition of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone,
1931) cultured in a zero water exchange heterotrophic system. Ann Anim Sci 20(4):1471–1486
Khanjani MH, Alizadeh M, Mohammadi M, Sarsangi Aliabad H (2021) The effect of adding molasses in
different times on performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) raised in a low-salinity biofloc
system. Ann Anim Sci 21(4):1435–1454
Khanjani MH, Mohammadi A, Emerenciano MGC (2022) Microorganisms in biofloc aquaculture system.
Aquacult Rep 26:101300
Khanjani MH, da Silva LOB, Foes GK, Vieira FD, Poli M, Santos M, Emerenciano MGC (2023a) Synbiot-
ics and aquamimicry as alternative microbial-based approaches in intensive shrimp farming and bio-
floc: novel disruptive techniques or complementary management tools? A Scientific-Based Overview
Aquaculture 567:739273
Khanjani MH, Sharifinia M, Emerenciano MGC (2023b) A detailed look at the impacts of biofloc on immu-
nological and hematological parameters and improving resistance to diseases. Fish Shellfish Immunol
137:108796
Khanjani MH, Sharifinia M, Hajirezaee S (2023c) Biofloc: a sustainable alternative for improving the pro-
duction of farmed cyprinid species. Aquac Rep 33:101748
Khanjani MH, Sharifinia M, Emerenciano MGC (2024b) Biofloc technology (BFT) in aquaculture: what
goes right, what goes wrong? A scientific-based snapshot. Aquacult Nutr 2024:7496572
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9369
Khanjani MH, Torfi Mozanzade M, Sharifinia M, Emerenciano MGC (2024a) Broodstock and seed produc-
tion in biofloc technology (BFT): an updated review focused on fish and penaeid shrimp. Aquaculture
579(30):740278
Khanjani MH, Zahedi S, Sharifinia M, Hajirezaee S, Singh SK (2024c)Biological removal of nitrog-
enous waste compounds in the biofloc aquaculture system: a review. Ann Anim Sci. https://doi.
org/10.2478/aoas-2024-0060
Kim JH, Park HJ, Kim KW, Hwang IK, Kim DH, Oh CW, Lee JS, Kang JC (2017) Growth performance,
oxidative stress, and non-specific immune responses in juvenile sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, by
changes of water temperature and salinity. Fish Physiol Biochem 43:1421–1431
Kim JH, Kim SK, Hur YB (2019) Hematological parameters and antioxidant responses in olive flounder
Paralichthys olivaceus in biofloc depend on water temperature. J Thermal Biol 82:206–212
Krishna C, Van Loosdrecht MCM (1999) Effect of temperature on storage polymers and settleability of
activated sludge. Water Res 33:2374–2382
Kuhn D, Lawrence A (2012) Biofloc technology options for aquaculture, in-situ, ex-situ systems improve
water quality, provide nutrition. Glob Aquacult Advocate 20–21
Kumari S, Harikrishna V, Surasani VKR, Balange AK, Babitha Rani AM (2021) Growth, biochemical
indices and carcass quality of red tilapia reared in zero water discharge based biofloc system in
various salinities using inland saline ground water. Aquaculture 540:736730
Lai W, Xu D, Li J, Wang Z, Ding Y, Wang X, Li X, Xu N, Mai K, Ai Q (2021) Dietary polystyrene
nanoplastics exposure alters liver lipid metabolism and muscle nutritional quality in carnivorous
marine fish large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). J Hazard Mater 419:126454
Lama S, Muylaert K, Karki TB, Foubert I, Henderson RK, Vandamme D (2016) Flocculation properties
of several microalgae and a cyanobacterium species during ferric chloride, chitosan and alkaline
flocculation. Bioresour Technol 220:464–470
Lara G, Krummenauer D, Abreu PC, Poersch LH, Wasielesky W (2017) The use of different aerators on
Litopenaeus vannamei biofloc culture system: effects on water quality, shrimp growth and biofloc
composition. Aquacult Int 25:147–162
Lauro FM, McDougald D, Thomas T, Williams TJ, Egan S, Rice S, … Cavicchioli R (2009) The
genomic basis of trophic strategy in marine bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:15527–15533
Lemonnier H, Bernard E, Boglio E, Goarant C, Cochard J (2004) Influence of sediment characteristics
on shrimp physiology: pH as principal effect. Aquaculture 240:297–312
Leong WH, Lim JW, Lam MK, Lam SM, Sin JC, Samson A (2021) Novel sequential flow baffled micro-
algal-bacterial photobioreactor for enhancing nitrogen assimilation into microalgal biomass whilst
bioremediating nutrient-rich wastewater simultaneously. J Hazard Mater 409:124455
Lewis JM, Klein G, Walsh PJ, Currie S (2012) Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) shift the age com-
position of circulating red blood cells towards a younger cohort when exposed to thermal stress. J
Comp Physiol B 182:663–671
Li Y, Liu Y, Zhang M, Zhang L (2022) Biodegradation of microplastics by a marine bacterium, Bacillus
cereus B-1. Environ Pollut 278:117314
Liang M, Wang S, Wang J, Chang Q, Mai K (2008) Comparison of flavor components in shrimp Litope-
naeus vannamei cultured in sea water and low salinity water. Fish Sci 74(5):1173–1179
Lim YS, Ganesan P, Varman M, Hamad FA, Krishnasamy S (2021) Effects of microbubble aeration on
water quality and growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in biofloc system. Aquacult Eng
93:102159
Lima PCM, Abreu JL, Silva AEM, Severi W, Galvez AO, Brito LO (2019) Nile tilapia fingerling culti-
vated in a low-salinity biofloc system at different stocking densities. Span J Agric Res 16(4):e0612
Lin YC, Chen JC (2001) Acute toxicity of ammonia on Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) juveniles at dif-
ferent salinity levels. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 259:109–119
Lin W, Luo H, Wu J, Hung TC, Cao B, Liu X, Yang J, Yang P (2023) A review of the emerging risks of
acute ammonia nitrogen toxicity to aquatic decapod crustaceans. Water 15:27
Liu W, Luo G, Chen W, Tan H, Wu S, Zhang N, Yu Y (2018) Effect of no carbohydrate addition on
water quality, growth performance and microbial community in water-reusing biofloc systems for
tilapia production under high-density cultivation. Aquac Res 49:2446–2454
Liu H, Li H, Wei H, Zhu X, Han D, Jin J, Yang Y, Xie S (2019) Biofloc formation improves water qual-
ity and fish yield in a freshwater pond aquaculture system. Aquaculture 506:256–269
Liu W, Du X, Tan H, Xie J, Luo G, Sun D (2021) Performance of a recirculating aquaculture system
using biofloc biofilters with convertible water-treatment efficiencies. Sci Total Environ 745:141918
Liu W, Guo Y, Li S, Luo G, Tan H (2022) The effect of total suspended solids on the nursery of Penaeus
vannamei nauplius based on biofloc technology system. Aquac Res 53(17):6369–6377
13
9370 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Liu MJ, Guo HY, Gao J, Zhu KC, Guo L, Liu BS, Zhang N, Jiang SG, Zhang DC (2023) Characteris-
tics of microplastic pollution in golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus) aquaculture areas and the
relationship between colonized-microbiota on microplastics and intestinal microflora. Sci Total
Environ 856:159180
Longnecker K, Lomas MW, Van Mooy BAS (2010) Abundance and diversity of heterotrophic bacterial cells
assimilating phosphate in the subtropical North Atlantic Ocean. Environ Microbiol 12(10):2773–2782
Lu J, Zhang Y, Wu J, Luo Y (2019) Effects of microplastics on distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in
recirculating aquaculture system. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 184:109631
Luo G, Avnimelech Y, Pan Y, Tan H (2013) Inorganic nitrogen dynamics in sequencing batch reactors using
biofloc technology to treat aquaculture sludge. Aquac Eng 52:73–79
Luo G, Gao Q, Wang C, Liu W, Sun D, Li L, Tan H (2014) Growth, digestive activity, welfare, and partial
cost-effectiveness of genetically improved farmed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured in a recir-
culating aquaculture system and an indoor biofloc system. Aquaculture 422–423:1–7
Luo G, Li W, Tan H, Chen X (2017) Comparing salinities of 0, 10 and 20 in biofloc genetically improved
farmed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) production systems. Aquac Fish 2:220–226
Lv W, Zhou W, Lu S, Huang W, Yuan Q, Tian M, Lv W, He D (2019) Microplastic pollution in rice-
fish co-culture system: a report of three farmland stations in Shanghai China. Sci Total Environ
652:1209–1218
Ma JL, Niu XJ, Zhang DQ, Lu L, Ye XY, Deng WD, Li YK, Lin Z (2020) High levels of microplastic pol-
lution in aquaculture water of fish ponds in the Pearl River Estuary of Guangzhou. China Sci Total
Environ 744:140679
Maicá PF, de Borba MR, Wasielesky W (2012) Effect of low salinity on microbial floc composition and per-
formance of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) juveniles reared in a zero-water-exchange super-intensive
system. Aquac Res 43(3):361–370
Maicá PF, Borba MRD, Martins TG, Wasielesky W (2014) Effect of salinity on performance and body
composition of Pacific white shrimp juveniles reared in a super-intensive system. Rev Bras Zootecn
43(7):343–350
Martins GB, Tarouco F, Rosa CE, Robaldo RB (2017) The utilization of sodium bicarbonate, calcium car-
bonate or hydroxide in biofloc system: water quality, growth performance and oxidative stress of Nile
tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 468:10–17
Martins GB, da Rosa CE, Tarouco FM, Robaldo RB (2019) Growth, water quality and oxidative stress of
Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.) in biofloc technology system at different pH. Aquacult Res
50(4):1030–1039
Mayo AW, Noike T (1996) Effects of temperature and pH on the growth of heterotrophic bacteria in waste
stabilization ponds. Water Res 30(2):447–455
Mcintosh BJ (2001) Changing paradigms in shrimp farming: establishment of heterotrophic bacterial com-
munities. Glob Aquacult Advocate 53–58
Meng LJ, Hu X, Wen B, Liu YH, Luo GZ, Gao JZ, Chen ZZ (2023) Microplastics inhibit biofloc formation
and alter microbial community composition and nitrogen transformation function in aquaculture. Sci
Total Environ 866:161362
Miao S, Sun L, Bu H, Zhu J, Chen G (2017) Effect of molasses addition at C: N ratio of 20: 1 on the water
quality and growth performance of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii). Aquacult
Int 25(4):1409–1425
Mitra S, Chakraborty AJ, Tareq AM, Emran TB, Nainu F, Khusro A, Idris AM, Khandaker MU, Osman
H, Alhumaydhi FA, Simal-Gandara J (2022) Impact of heavy metals on the environment and human
health: novel therapeutic insights to counter the toxicity. J King Saud Univ Sci 34(3):101865
Mohsenpour SF, Hennige S, Willoughby N, Adeloye A, Gutierrez T (2021) Integrating microalgae into
wastewater treatment: a review. Sci Total Environ 752:142168
Montoya R, Lawrence AL, Grant WE, Velasco M (2000) Simulation of phosphorus dynamics in an inten-
sive shrimp culture system: effects of feed formulations and feeding strategies, Vol. 129
Mubiana VK, Blust R (2007) Effects of temperature on scope for growth and accumulation of Cd Co, Cu
and Pb by the marine bivalve Mytilus edulis. Mar Environ Res 63:219–235
Narum SR, Campbell NR, Meyer KA, Miller MR, Hardy RW (2013) Thermal adaptation and acclimation of
ectotherms from differing aquatic climates. Mol Ecol 22:3090–3097
Naserizadeh M, Fereidouni AE, Agh N, Harsij M (2020) The effect of different levels of water alkalinity on
growth and reproductive parameters of Artemia franciscana in the biofloc based culturing system. J
Anim Environ 12(2):355–362
Ouyang MY, Liu JH, Wen B, Huang JN, Feng XS, Gao JZ, Chen ZZ (2021) Ecological stoichiometric and
stable isotopic responses to microplastics are modified by food conditions in koi carp. J Hazard Mater
404:124121
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9371
Panigrahi A, Sundaram M, Chakrapani S, Rajasekar S, Syama Dayal J, Chavali G (2019) Effect of carbon
and nitrogen ratio (C:N) manipulation on the production performance and immunity of Pacific white
shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in a biofloc-based rearing system. Aquac Res 50:29–41
Patkaew S, Direkbusarakom S, Hirono I, Wuthisuthimethavee S, Powtongsook S, Pooljun C (2024) Effect of
supersaturated dissolved oxygen on growth, survival, and immune-related gene expression of Pacific
white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Vet World 17(1):50–58
Pasco MJ (2015) Aeraçãoem cultivos superintensivos de tilapias Oreochromis niloticus, em bioflocos e
com troca mínima de água. Tese Doutorado em aquicultura. Universidade Federal De Santa Cata-
rina, Centro De Ciências Agrárias Departamento De Aquicultura, Florianapolis. Brasil
Pellegrin L, Nitz LF, Pinto DDSB, Copatti CE, Wasielesky W, Garcia L (2022) Effects of suspended
solids in the survival and haematological parameters of pacu juveniles (Piaractus mesopotamicus)
in a biofloc technology culture system. Aquac Res 53:276–284
Pérez-Fuentes JA, Hernándes-Vergara MP, Pérez-Rostro CI, Fogel I (2016) C: N ratios affect nitrogen
removal and production of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus raised in a biofloc system under high
density cultivation. Aquaculture 452:247–251
Phulia V, Mandal B, Bera A, Singh SK, Das R, Jamwal A (2012) Factors controlling biofloc characteris-
tics. World Aquacult 43:57–59
Piérri V (2012) Efeito da alcalinidade sobre o cultivo de Litopenaeus vannamei em sistema de bioflocos.
Tese de Mestrado, Universidade Federal De Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brasil
Pimentel OALF, Amado AM, They NH (2020) Higher nitrogen and phosphorus immobilization in bio-
flocs is associated with higher temperature and increased suspended solids in shrimp farming with
biofloc technology. Aquacult Res 51(9):3888–3899
Piñeros-Roldan J, Gutiérrez-Espinosa MC, Lapa-Viana M, Emerenciano MGC (2020) Aireación en la
tecnología Biofloc (BTF): principios básicos, aplicaciones y perspectivas. Revista Politécnica
16(31):29–40
Pinho SM, de Lima JP, David LH, Emerenciano MGC, Goddek S, Verdegem MCJ, Keesman KJ, Por-
tella MC (2022) FLOCponics: the integration of biofloc technology with plant production. Rev
Aquacult 14(2):647–675
Poersch L, Brunson J, Gaona CAP, Stokes A, Richardson J, Pitts K, Leffler J (2021) Pacific white
shrimp, red drum, and tilapia integrated in a biofloc system: use of tilapia as a consumer of total
suspended solids. J World Aquac Soc 52(6):1168–1177
Poli MA, Schveitzer R, Nuner AP (2015) The use of biofloc technology in a South American catfish
(Rhamdia quelen) hatchery: effect of suspended solids in the performance of larvae. Aquac Eng
66:17–21
Ponce-Palafox J, Pavia AA, López DGM, Arredondo-Figueroa JL, Lango-Reynoso F, Castañeda-Chávez
M, Esparza-Leal H, Ruiz-Luna A, Páez-Ozuna F, Castillo-Vargasmachuca SG, Peraza-Gómez
V (2019) Response surface analysis of temperature-salinity interaction effects on water quality,
growth and survival of shrimp Penaeus vannamei postlarvae raised in biofloc intensive nursery
production. Aquaculture 503:312–321
Price PB, Sowers T (2004) Temperature dependence of metabolic rates for microbial growth, mainte-
nance, and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(13):4631–4636
Rajkumar M, Pandey PK, Aravind R, Vennila A, Bharti V, Purushothaman CS (2016) Effect of different
biofloc system on water quality, biofloc composition and growth performance in Litopenaeus van-
namei (Boone, 1931). Aquac Res 47(11):3432–3444
Rajta A, Bhatia R, Setia H, Pathania P (2020) Role of heterotrophic aerobic denitrifying bacteria in
nitrate removal from wastewater. J Appl Microbiol 128:1261–1278
Ray AJ, Lotz JM (2014) Comparing a chemoautotrophic-based biofloc system and three heterotrophic-
based systems receiving different carbohydrate sources. Aquac Eng 63:54–61
Ray AJ, Lotz JM (2017) Comparing salinities of 10, 20, and 30‰ in intensive, commercial-scale biofloc
shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) production systems. Aquaculture 476:29–36
Ray AJ, Lewis BL, Browdy CL, Leffler JW (2010a) Suspended solids removal to improve shrimp (Lito-
penaeus vannamei) production and an evaluation of a plant-based feed in minimal-exchange,
superintensive culture systems. Aquaculture 299:89–98
Ray AJ, Seaborn G, Leffler JW, Wilde SB, Lawson A, Browdy CL (2010b) Characterization of microbial
communities in minimal-exchange, intensive aquaculture systems and the effects of suspended sol-
ids management. Aquaculture 310:130–138
Ray AJ, Dillon KS, Lotz JM (2011) Water quality dynamics and shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) produc-
tion in intensive, mesohaline culture systems with two levels of biofloc management. Aquac Eng
45(3):127–136
13
9372 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Raza B, Zheng Z, Yang W (2024) A review on biofloc system technology, history, types, and future eco-
nomical perceptions in aquaculture. Animals 14(10):1489
Roy D, Benkaraache S, Lemay JF, Landry D, Drogui P, Tyagi RD (2019) High-strength ammonium
wastewater treatment by MBR: steady-state nitrification kinetic parameters. J Water Process Eng
32:100945
Samocha T (2019) Sustainable biofloc systems for marine shrimp. Academic Press
Samocha TM, Patnaik S, Speed M, Ali AM, Burger JM, Almeida RV, Ayub Z, Harisanto M, Horowitz A,
Brook DL (2007) Use of molasses as carbon source in limited discharge nursery and grow-out sys-
tems for Litopenaeus vanammei. Aquac Eng 36:184–191
Samocha TM, Prangnell DI, Hanson TR, Treece GD, Morris TC, Castro LF, Staresinic N (2017) Design and
operation of super intensive, biofloc-dominated systems for indoor production of the Pacific white
shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei – The Texas A&M AgriLife Research experience. The World Aqua-
culture Society, Louisiana, p 368
Schveitzer R, Arantes R, Costódio PF, Do Espírito Santo CM, Arana LV, Seiffert WQ, Andreatta ER (2013)
Effect of different biofloc levels on microbial activity, water quality and performance of Litopenaeus
vannamei in a tank system operated with no water exchange. Aquac Eng 56:59–70
Schveitzer R, Baccarat RFC, Gaona CAP, Wasielesky W, Arantes R (2024) Concentration of suspended sol-
ids in superintensive culture of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei with biofloc technol-
ogy (BFT): a review. Rev Aquacult 16(2):785–795
Shukri ZNA, Chik CENCE, Hossain S, Othman R, Endut A, Lananan F, ... Kasan NA (2022) A novel study
on the effectiveness of bioflocculant-producing bacteria Bacillus enclensis, isolated from biofloc-
based system as a biodegrader in microplastic pollution. Chemosphere 308 (Pt 2): 136410.
Sigee DC (2005) Freshwater microbiology: biodiversity and dynamic interactions of microorganisms in the
aquatic environment. John Wiley & Sons LTD, p 544
Silva KR, Wasielesky W, Abreu PC (2013) Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in the biofloc production of
the Pacific white shrimp. Litopenaeus Vannamei J World Aquac Soc 44(1):30–41
Silva UL, Falcon DR, Pessôa MN, Correia E (2017) Carbon sources and C: N ratios on water quality for
Nile tilapia farming in biofloc system. Rev Caatinga 30(4):1017–1027
Smith VH (1983) Low nitrogen to phosphorus ratios favor dominance by blue-green algae in lake phyto-
plankton. Science 221(4611):669–671
Soares de Moura P, Walielesky W, De la Paz SF, Braga A, Poersch L (2021) Partial seawater inclusion to
improve Litopenaeus vannamei performance in low salinity biofloc systems. Aquaculture 531:735905
Soaudy MR, Ghonimy A, López Greco LS, Chen Z, Dyzenchauz A, Li J (2023) Total suspended solids
and their impact in a biofloc system: current and potentially new management strategies. Aquaculture
572:739524
Solanki S, Meshram SJ, Dhamagaye HB, Naik SD, Shingare PE, Yadav BM (2023) Effect of C/N ratio
levels and stocking density of catla spawn (Gibelion catla) on water quality, growth performance, and
biofloc nutritional composition in an indoor biofloc system. Aquac Res 2023:2501653
Stokstad E (2010) Down on the Shrimp Farm. Science 328:5985
Strand Å, Bailey J, Rydstedt A, James P, Legat J, Sühnel S (2022) Overview of culture systems for low
trophic species, AquaVitae, Tromsø, 62 pages
Suchithra R, Sruthilaya V, Shanmathi R, Sneha V, Navaseelan P (2016) pH Controller for Water Treatment
Using Fuzzy Logic,” p. 5
Suita SM, Cardozo AP, Romano LA, Abreu PC, Wasielesky W (2015) Development of the hepatopancreas
and quality analysis of post-larvae Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei produced in a BFT
system. Aquacult Int 23(2):449–463
Tarre S, Green M (2004) High-rate nitrification at low pH in suspended- and attached-biomass reactors.
Appl Environ Microbiol 70(11):6481–6487
Thilakan AP, Pandey PK, Lekshmi M, Shukla SP, Sreekanth GB (2019) Effect of biofloc on water quality
and growth performance of Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790). J Entomol Zool Stu 7(1):1287–1291
Tumwesigye W, Opio F, Kemigabo C, Mujuni B (2022) the effect of water quality on aquaculture productiv-
ity in Ibanda District, Uganda. Aquac J 2:23–36
Ueno-Fukura M, Corredor-Ruiz JS, Jiménez-Ojeda YK, Collazos-Lasso LF (2019) Usage of alkalizers in
the nursery culture of Piaractus brachypomus with Biofloc technology–BFT. Aquaculture, aquarium,
conservation and legislation. Int J Bioflux Soc 12(4):989–995
Ulloa Walker DA, Morales Suazo MC, Emerenciano MGC (2020) Biofloc technology: principles focused
on potential species and the case study of Chilean river shrimp Cryphiops caementarius. Rev Aquac
12:1759–1782
Valenzuela-Jiménez M, Durruty-Lagunes C, Cuzon G, Pacheco E, Arévalo M, Aguilera-Rivera D, Wasie-
lesky W, Rodríguez-Fuentes G, Barreto A, Gaxiola G (2022) Effect of water salinity on the oxidative
13
Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374 9373
system of juveniles of the North Atlantic white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus reared in biofloc tech-
nology. J World Aquac Soc 53(1):258–270
Van Wyk P, Scarpa J (1999) Water quality requirements and management. In: Van Wyk, P., Davis-Hodg-
kins, M., Laramore, C., Main, K.L., Mountain, J., Scarpa, J. (Eds.), Farming marine shrimp in recir-
culating freshwater systems. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee,
Florida, USA: Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution Ft. Pierce, FL, p. 141
Villano M, Beccari M, Dionisi D, Lampis S, Miccheli A, Vallini G, Majone M (2010) Effect of pH on the
production of bacterial poly-hydroxyalkanoates by mixed cultures enriched under periodic feeding.
Process Biochem 45:714–723
Vinatea L, Olivera Gálvez A, Venero J, Leffler J, Browdy C (2009) Oxygen consumption of Litopenaeus
vannamei juveniles in heterotrophic medium with zero water exchange. Pesqui Agropecu Bras
44:534–538
Vinatea L, Galvez AO, Browdy CL, Stokes A, Venero J, Haveman J, Lewis BL, Lawson A, Shuler A, Lef-
fler JW (2010) Photosynthesis, water respiration and growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei
in a super-intensive raceway culture with zero water exchange: Interaction of water quality variables.
Aquac Eng 42(1):17–24
Wasielesky W, Atwood H, Stokes A, Browdy CL (2006a) Effect of natural production in a zero exchange
suspended microbial £oc based super-intensive culture system for white shrimp Litopenaeus van-
namei. Aquaculture 258:396–403
Wasielesky W, Atwood H, Kegl R, Bruce J, Stokes A, Browdy CL (2006b) Efeito do ph na sobrevivência
e crescimento do camarão branco Litopenaeus vannamei em cultivos superintensivos. Aquaciência
2006. Anais do congresso.
Wei YF, Liao SA, Wang AL (2016) The effect of different carbon sources on the nutritional composition,
microbial community and structure of bioflocs. Aquaculture 465:88–93
Wei XF, Bohlen M, Lindblad C, Hedenqvist M, Hakonen A (2021) Microplastics generated from a biode-
gradable plastic in freshwater and seawater. Water Res 198:117123
Wei XF, Capezza AJ, Cui Y, Li L, Hakonen A, Liu B, Hedenqvis MS (2022) Millions of microplastics
released from a biodegradable polymer during biodegradation/enzymatic hydrolysis. Water Res
211:118068
Whangchai N, Chitmanat C, Ramaraj R, Itayama T (2018) Effects of water flow rate and water quality on
tilapia culture in the Mae Ping River Thailand. Chiang Mai J Sci 45(3):1318–1322
Whangchai N, Klahan R, Balakrishnan D, Unpaprom Y, Ramaraj R, Pimpimol T (2022) Development of
aeration devices and feeding frequencies for oxygen concentration improvement in 60-tones freshwa-
ter recirculating aquaculture and biofloc ponds of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) rearing. Chemos-
phere 307:135761
Widanarni W, Ekasari J, Maryam S (2012) Evaluation of biofloc technology application on water quality
and production performance of red tilapia Oreochromis sp. cultured at different stocking densities.
HAYATI J Biosci 19(2):73–80
Wilen BM, Balmer P (1999) The effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on the structure, size and size
distribution of activated sludge flocs. Water Res 33:391–400
Wilen BM, Nielsen JL, Keiding K, Nielsen PH (2000) Influence of microbial activity on the stability of acti-
vated sludge flocs. Colloids Surf B 18:145–156
Wu Y, Xie B, Zhang L, Li Y (2022) Biodegradation of microplastics by a marine bacterium, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa B-3. Environ Sci Technol 56(17):12075–12086
Xiao Y, Deng Z, Tan H, Jiang T, Chen Z (2022) Bibliometric analysis of the knowledge base and future
trends on sarcopenia from 1999–2021. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(14):8866
Yang H, Xiong H, Mi K, Xue W, Wei W, Zhang Y (2020) Toxicity comparison of nano-sized and micron-
sized microplastics to goldfish Carassius auratus larvae. J Hazard Mater 388:122058
Yao C, Tan H, Luo G, Li L (2013) Effects of temperature on inorganic nitrogen dynamics in sequencing
batch reactors using biofloc technology to treat aquaculture sludge. N Am J Aquac 75:463–467
Yin L, Chen B, Xia B, Shi X, Qu K (2018) Polystyrene microplastics alter the behavior, energy reserve and
nutritional composition of marine jacopever (Sebastes schlegelii). J Hazard Mater 360:97–105
Yu YB, Lee JH, Choi JH, Choi YJ, Jo A, Choi CY, Kang JC, Kim JH (2023a) The application and future of
biofloc technology (BFT) in aquaculture industry: a review. J Environ Manag 342:118237
Yu YB, Lee KM, Kim JH, Kang JC, Kim JH (2023b) Comparative analysis of morphological characteris-
tics, hematological parameters, body composition and sensory evaluation in olive flounder, Paralich-
thys olivaceus raised in biofloc and seawater to evaluate marketability. Aquac Rep 30:101616
Zemor JC, Wasielesky W, Fóes GK, Poersch LH (2019) The use of clarifiers to remove and control the total
suspended solids in large-scale ponds for production of Litopenaeus vannamei in a biofloc system.
Aquac Eng 85:74–79
13
9374 Aquaculture International (2024) 32:9321–9374
Zhang SY, Li G, Wu HB, Liu XG, Yao YH, Tao L, Liu H (2011) An integrated recirculating aquaculture
system (RAS) for land-based fish farming: the effects on water quality and fish production. Aquac
Eng 45(3):93–102
Zhang K, Pan L, Chen W, Wang C (2017) Effect of using sodium bicarbonate to adjust the pH to different
levels on water quality, the growth and the immune response of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei reared
in zero-water exchange biofloc-based culture tanks. Aquac Res 48(3):1194–1208
Zhang M, Li Y, Xu DH, Qiao G, Zhang J, Qi Z, Li Q (2018) Effect of different water biofloc contents on
the growth and immune response of gibel carp cultured in zero water exchange and no feed addition
system. Aquac Res 49(4):1647–1656
Zitouni N, Bousserrhine N, Belbekhouche S, Missawi O, Alphonse V, Boughatass I, Banni M (2020) First
report on the presence of small microplastics (≤ 3 μm) in tissue of the commercial fish Serranus
scriba (Linnaeus. 1758) from Tunisian coasts and associated cellular alterations. Environ Pollut
263:114576
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under
a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted
manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable
law.
13