1 MSD
1 MSD
2.Poliomyelitis:
Acute poliomyelitis is a disease of the anterior horn motor neurons of the
spinal cord and brain stem caused by poliovirus.
Flaccid asymmetric weakness and muscle atrophy are the hallmarks of its
clinical manifestations.
Characteristics:
• severe muscle pain
• flaccid tone
• fasciculation
• areflexia
• dysphagia
• dysphonia
• respiratory failure
3. Guillain Barre Syndrome:
GBS is an immune-mediated, rapidly progressive, predominantly motor,
neuropathy that often leads to bulbar and respiratory compromise.
It is a common cause of acute flaccid paralysis in children.
Characteristics:
• flaccid dysarthria
• Paraesthesia
• Symmetric ascending weakness
• Facial weakness
• Involvement of respiratory muscles.
• Tachycardia
• arrhythmia
• Bladder dysfunction
4.Myasthenia Gravis:
It is a rare autoimmune disease in which antibodies attack postsynaptic
acetylcholine receptors on the NMJ of skeletal muscle.
Destruction of these postsynaptic neurons result in a progressive weakness of
the skeletal muscles.
6.Congenital myopathy:
Group of muscle disorders caused by genetic defects in contractile apparatus
of the muscle. It damages the lower motor pathway.
Major presentation is “floppy infant syndrome”.
Characteristics:
• Hypotonia
• Static muscle weakness
• Reduced tendon reflex
• Swallowing problems
• Respiratory problems
7.Beckers Muscular Dystrophy:
It is an X-linked recessive inherited dystrophinopathy characterized by slowly
progressing muscle weakness of the legs and pelvis.
Signs and symptoms:
• Muscle weakness, gradually increase difficulty with walking
• Severe upper extremity muscle weakness
• Toe-walking
• Difficulty breathing
• Skeletal deformities of chest and back
• Pseudohypertrophy of calf muscles
• Muscle cramps.
Beckers muscular dystrophy is often associated with flaccid paralysis
(dysarthria) as the muscle weakness is prominent in facial, jaw and neck
musculature.
8.Duchene Muscular Dystrophy:
It is an inherited disorder of progressive muscular weakness. It is a severe form
of muscular dystrophy caused by flaw in the gene that controls the muscle
health. Mutation at locus Xp21. Mostly seen in boys.
In patients with DMD, speech problems precede muscle weakness. It is often
associated with lower motor neuron dysarthria.
Signs and symptoms:
• Walk on forefeet
• Increased muscle tone
• Fatigue
• Late onset of speech
• Facial weakness
h) Childhood apraxia of speech and nonverbal oral apraxia: definition,
characteristics and classification
Apraxia: it is a motor disorder caused by damage to brain which causes
problem in Motor Planning/Programming i.e inability to group and sequence
the relevant muscle with respect to each other.
It can be acquired (due to traumatic brain injury) and developmental (since
birth)
There are different types of apraxia
1. Ideational apraxia
2. Ideomotor apraxia
Ideational apraxia:
It is inability to make use of an object or a gesture in a correct way and have
difficulty in carrying out the sequential actions in order to use it. Disturbance in
the concept of an object.
Ideomotor apraxia:
It is a disturbance of performance of an object or gesture. The concept of the
object is present but sequence of movement to use it is absent.
Typically affects voluntary movements more often than spontaneous or
automatic movements. Errors can be inconsistent on repeated attempts of
same function.
Types of Ideomotor apraxia:
1. Limb apraxia
2. Nonverbal oral apraxia
3. Apraxia of speech
optic nerve Sense of sight Place colours infront of the client ask
balance him/her to name them:
Red, green, yellow, blue, black.
oculomotor Eye ball Ask the client to move the eye ball to left,
trochlear movement right, up and down
abducent
trigeminal nerve Chewing a) clinician should apply moderate pressure
sensation of on clients mandible and ask to close the
the face mouth
b) blind fold the client and check for the
sensation of face by touching the skin
surface with a cotton swab.
Facial nerve Taste a) Ask the client to taste the following and
sensation, identify it: Honey, salt.
movement of
facial b) ask the client to :
expression smile, pucker, blow, raise eyebrow
Neuro-muscular status:
neuromuscular processes are the foundation of all voluntary movement in the
body. As the evaluation is administered, the clinician needs to constantly
assess the patient’s muscle strength, speed of movement, range of motion,
accuracy of movement, motor steadiness, and muscle tone. Darley called these
six processes the “salient features” of neuromuscular function.
Muscle Strength: If a muscle within the motor speech mechanism does not
have adequate strength, it may not be able to perform its speech production
tasks adequately. Muscle strength is assessed, For eg, a patient is asked to
press his or her tongue against a tongue blade or asked to count out loud from
1 to 100 (a task known as “stress testing” the speech mechanism).
Speed of Movement: Accurate speech requires very rapid muscle movements.
The tongue and vocal folds, in particular, make many rapid movements during
the production of speech. Speed of movement is assessed through tasks that
concentrate on alternate motion rates (AMR) and sequential motion rates
(SMR). Both AMR and SMR tasks are included in the protocol
Range of Movement: Range of movement is how far the articulators can travel
during the course of a movement. Instances of reduced range of movement
include an inability to fully open the jaw or completely adduct the vocal folds.
Prosody, especially, could be affected by reduced range of movement in the
articulators. Range of movement is assessed most directly in which the patient
is asked to extend or hold the articulators in various positions.
Accuracy of Movement: Clear speech production requires accurate movements
by the articulators. An accurate movement is one in which strength, speed,
range, direction, and timing are precisely coordinated (Darley et al., 1975). If
any of these are out of sync, the result can be an inaccurate movement,
causing such problems as a distorted consonant or intermittent hypernasality.
The AMR and SMR tasks are good for assessing the accuracy of movement, as
are conversational speech and spoken paragraph reading
Motor Steadiness: Motor steadiness is the ability to hold a body part still.
There are several disorders in which involuntary movements prevent motor
steadiness, ex. tremor. These can affect the laryngeal musculature and lead to
a tremulous vocal quality during speech. Motor steadiness is assessed by tasks
that require a patient to hold a position or prolong a vowel. A breakdown in
motor steadiness will reveal itself in an inability to maintain a still position or
to produce a prolonged vowel that is smooth and steady
Muscle Tone: Normal muscle tone is the constant amount of muscle
contraction that is always present, even when a muscle is fully relaxed.
Damage to the nervous system can either decrease or increase muscle tone,
depending on where the damage occurs. Decreased muscle tone is associated
with muscle weakness or paralysis. Increased tone is associated with muscle
spasticity or rigidity. Abnormal muscle tone can be inferred by listening to the
patient’s speech or by looking at the affected body parts.
Other components in neuromuscular assessment are:
Vital signs: Confirmatory signs are additional clues about the location of
pathology. In the context of speech examination, they are signs other than
deviant speech characteristics and the salient neuromuscular features that
characterize them that help confirm the speech diagnosis. Examples of
confirmatory signs within the speech system are atrophy, reduced tone,
fasciculations, poorly inhibited laughter or crying, reduced normal reflexes or
the presence of pathologic reflexes, pain.
Sensation: it provides valuable information of how the information from
outside world is integrated by the nervous system.
Functional mobility assessment: it includes assessing rolling, upright tolerance,
getting in and out of bed and chair, walking, stepping, and climbing, changing
directions, lifting, carrying, and reaching, etc.
c) Assessment of speech sub-systems – quantitative and qualitative
Speech subsystems include: articulatory, respiratory, resonatory and
phonatory system.
Respiratory system: it includes assessment of the respiratory volumes and
lung capacities, respiratory efficiency, etc.
• observe the breathing patterns for speech and non-speech activities.
• s/z ratio: it is the ratio of maximum phonation time for /s/ to /z/. it is
measured in seconds. Normal s/z ratio is 1:1, 1:4 is abnormal ratio,
indicating respiratory deficiency.
• MPT: it is the sustained vowel production following as deep an
inhalation is possible. Measured in seconds. Sustain the vowel /a/.
normal MPT for adult females is 15 to 25 sec and 25 to 35 for males.
• Pulmonary function studies (PFT’s)
• Spirometry: it uses a device called spirometer (wet/ dry) which measures
the air/lung volume. Wet spirometer consist a bell inverted in a vessel of
water. In dry spirometer there is a hand-held spirometer.
Phonatory system: it includes subjective and objective examination.
Subjective rating scales: it involves analysis of voice/ phonation solely by
listening. Clinician should consider a number of factors. Usually, this scale
assesses the parameters of phonation such as roughness, breathiness, strain.
Clinician based: GRBAS, CAPE-V, Buffallo III
Patient based: V-RQOL, VHI-10, VHI-30.
Objective rating scales: it includes Visi-pitch, CSL/MDVP, MultiSpeech, etc.
Resonatory system: resonatory system includes the cavities that shape the
utterances like oral cavity, nasal cavity, etc. While assessing for nasal
resonance check if hypernasality/ hypo-nasality is present.
Subjective measurement: use mirror fogging technique. Keep the mirror
underneath the nares and observe for any fog on it during a non-nasal sound.
If fogging appears, hypernasality is seen. For hypo-nasality do the same task
with a nasal sound.
Objective measurement: it could be performed by using Nasometer.
Nasometer refers to the instrument that measures and give feedback on the
presence of nasality in speech production, by measuring the movement of
velopharynx.
Voice assessment: It can be assessed using various instrumentation such
• Computerized Speech Lab (CSL)
• Multispeech
• Visi-pitch
• Laryngo-strobo-video-endoscopy
• FEESST
Loudness: it could be subjectively measured in volume and objectively
measured using SLM in decibels.
Speech Rate: speech rate could be assessed using :
• DDK rate: ( AMR and SMR)
• WPM – words per minute
• SPS – Syllables per second
d) Assessment of speech intelligibility and comprehensibility
Intelligibility is a measure of how comprehensible speech is in given
conditions. Intelligibility is a perceptual judgment that is based on how much
of the child's spontaneous speech the listener understands. Intelligibility can
vary along a continuum ranging from intelligible to unintelligible.
It is affected by the level (loud but not too loud) and quality of the speech
signal, the type and level of background noise, reverberation and, for speech
over communication devices, the properties of the communication system.
Clinical uses of intelligibility measures:
• Index of severity
• Index of functional limitation.
• Measure of change over time: treatment progress, recovery,
degeneration.
Rating scales and other estimates that are based on perceptual judgments are
commonly used to assess intelligibility
7point Intelligibility Rating Scale AYJNIHH
Speech sample Rating
Scale
Normal 0
Client/Child’s speech can be understood without difficulty 1
however listener feels that the speech is not normal
Client/ child’s speech can be understood with little effort but 2
occasionally listeners need to ask for repetition
Client/ child’s speech can be understood with concentration and 3
effort especially by a sympathetic listener
Client/child’s speech can be understood with difficulty and 4
concentration by family members but not by others
Client/child’s speech can be understood with difficulty and 5
efforts, if the context is known by the listener
Client/child’s speech cannot be understood at all even when the 6
context is known
Write down procedures: they are generally the best approach. Listeners try to
identify exactly what the intended message was and calculate the percentage
understood. It is possible at several linguistic levels:
• Single words (spontaneous or imitated)
• Sentences (spontaneous or imitated)
• Conversation
1. single word approach: One of the most flexible approach is:
(CSIM) childrens speech intelligibility measure – by Wilcox and morris.
• CSIM includes 50 test items.
• It is not norm-referenced.
• CSIM can be administered multiple times because unique test is created
each time. Each item has 12 similar sounding words.
• Child imiatates the clinician and record the sample and give it to
unfamiliar listeners, listeners write down what they comprehend and
calculate the actual percentage understood by the listener.
2. sentence level procedure:
A] for a very young and unintelligible child:
Beginner’s inteligibilty test (BIT)
• originally designed for hearing impaired child but can be used for all
populations.
• It is used
• BIT is NOT norm referenced.
• Includes 4 sets of 2 to 5 word sentences. It uses one set each time so
that it could be administers at regular intervals.
• Child imitates or reads the sentences which are recorded and given to 2
unfamiliar listeners who write down what they hear.
• Calculate the percentage of words correctly identified.
B] for older children 7+ years:
Assessment of inteligibilty of dysarthric speech ( sentence portion)
• NOT Norm referenced
• Select 5 sentences from each list of 5 to 8 word sentences ( 20 total
sentences, 138 total words).
• Child imitates or reads the sentence which is recorded and transcribed
by 2 unfamiliar listeners
• Total percentage understood by the listener is calculated.
3. conversation:
• record true interaction
• Avoid narratives as they may induce abnormal prosody which may
influence scores.
• Have unfamiliar listeners transcribe what they hear.
• Calculate the percentage understood.
Assessment: (history)
Age of onset: Drooling in the neonatal period should alert the physician to the
possibility of esophageal atresia or withdrawal from maternal substance abuse.
A mild degree of drooling is normal during infancy.
Chronicity: An acute onset suggests an infection or drug intoxication. Drooling
of long duration may be developmental or secondary to a structural lesion,
neuromuscular disorder or mental retardation.
Severity: The severity can be gauged by the frequency of bathing, wiping and
need for bibs or clothing changes.
Precipitating factors: Any precipitating factors such as ingestion of food and
teething should be noted.
Developmental history: A thorough developmental history is of extreme
importance. Generalized delay in all aspects of developmental milestones
suggests mental retardation.
Drug use: A detailed drug history is important because the use of medication
may lead to drooling.
Psychosocial history: Any psychosocial or emotional stress should be noted as
a potential cause of the drooling
Measurement: measurement of drooling using radioisotopes can be done.
The procedure consists of injecting a radioisotope into the subject, having the
radioisotope excreted in the saliva and sampling the saliva periodically.
From the measured radioactivity in the bibs and the salivary samples, the
amount of drooled saliva can be calculated .
Severity scale of drooling:
• Dry: never drools
• Mild: only lips are wet
• Moderate: lips and chin wet
• Severe : clothing soiled
• Profuse: clothing, hands and tray moist and wet.
Management: ( speech therapy)
Modification of Situational Factors:
Certain factors may lead to increased drooling. Treatment of dental problems,
chronic nasal obstruction with obligate mouth breathing, enlarged tonsils,
extra-esophageal reflux disease, and poor posture may lead to a significant
decrease in the frequency and severity of drooling and obviate the need for
further therapy
Oral Sensorimotor Intervention:
it is intended to increase coordinated muscle function in the oral cavity and to
improve swallowing and control of secretions, as well as focuses on speech
production in some instances.
The position, mobility, strength of the tongue, lips, jaw, and head control are
the most important aspects of an oral sensorimotor program
Therapy may focus on facilitating lip closure, tongue control, and purposeful/
volitional swallowing of saliva as well as food and liquid, guidance regarding
use of optimal positioning, special equipment (e.g., wheelchair design), and
adaptive feeding utensils.
Oral facial facilitation using:
• Icing
• Brushing
• Vibration
• Manipulation
• Oral motor sensory exercises
Oral Appliances: Prosthetic devices may be helpful in some patients and are
usually made by the dentist.
Pharmacologic therapy/ medication: Pharmacotherapy alone may have a
useful role in many patients, especially those with mild to moderate drooling
and mild to moderate cognitive deficits. Few medicines can reduce the
secretion of saliva by inhibiting the part of autonomic system i.e
parasympathetic system such as “ robinul, artane, cogentine and sal-tropine”.
Surgical Treatment Options: surgery involves either changing the direction of
the diection of the ducts or removing the salivary gland tissue.
• Laser surgery: it allows a quicker recovery
• Botulinum toxin injections: done under anesthesia, the toxin is injected
into the parotid glands, lasts upto 8 months.
• Radiotherapy: or use of x-rays to destroy part of the salivary glands , is
only used in severe cases and not usaually in children.
Surgical options:
− submandibular duct rerouting
− Submandibular duct excision
− Parotid duct ligation
− Transtympanic neurectomy
Alternate therapy:
1. Behavior modification and biofeedback:
− seem applicable for a small group of patients who are highly motivated
(along with the families and other caregivers) and who have the
intellectual capacity to follow instructions with demonstration.
− One goal of behavior modification is to increase the sensory awareness
of the drooling in order to promote mouth closing and swallowing more
frequently on the basis of verbal or gestural reminders.
2. Hypnotherapy: has been used in some patients with variant amount of
success.
3. Bibs : they are useful in protecting skin and clothing.
e) Behavioral management of respiratory, phonatory, resonatory and
articulatory subsystems
The speech subsystems do not act independently. Motor speech treatment
should be thus taken in a heirarchial manner.
− First order targets: Respiration and Resonance
− Second order target: Phonation
− Third order target: Articulation and Prosody
Management goals:
1. restore lost function.
2. Promote the use of residual function ( compensate)
3. Reduce the need for lost function ( adjust)
Duration of treatment: it should be provided for as long as it is necessary to
accomplish its goals. It depends upon the etiology, prognosis, specific goals,
needs, etc.
Behavioral management includes:
− Improving physiologic support for specch
− Compensatory speaking strategies
− Developing augmentative means of communication
− Controlling the environment and communicative interactions.
Guidelines:
− Begin early, take baseline data to establish goals
− Increase physiologic support
− help patient to be able to self- monitor.
− Implement principles of motor learning.
ARTICULATORY SYSTEM:
1. Strengthening exercises: it should be used only after establishing that
weakness of the oral articulators is clearly related to dysarthria
Exercises need to overload the muscles in some way. Need to do 5 sets of 10
repetition each. The first few minutes should be used to increase attention to
the face, awareness of movement, etc. It increases the stability, speed, range,
strength and accuracy of movement of oral muscle groups of articulation.
2. relaxation exercises: improve muscle tone in patient with spasticity or
rigidity.ex. shaking the head and the open jaw, chewing to promote tongue
and jaw relaxation.
3. stretching exercise:
Tongue stretching: hold tongue tip with a guaze pad, pull straightforward, pull
left and right and hold each position for 10 sec.
Lips stretching: clinician carefully pulls out lip and away from the face and hold.
Jaw stretching: patient holds maximum opening with and without physical
assistance and holds jaw lateralized to left or right.
4. traditional articulation treatment:
• Integral stimulation: watch and listen imitation tasks.
• Phonetic placement: increase awareness of how sounds are produced by
using hand on assistance.
• Phonetic derivation: using the intact non speech gestures to establish a
target such as blowing to facilitate production of /u/
• Intelligibility drills, minimal contrast drills, etc.
RESONATORY SYSTEM:
Below are few behavioural techniques used in treatment of resonatory
systems.
• Decreasing speaking rate, change level of effort
• Monitoring nasal airflow and resonance features
• Increasing precision of speech by exaggerating movements
• Speaking with a greater open mouth posture
• Resistance training CPAP
• Encouraging the client to facilitate elevation of the palate
• Repeat a series of nasal and voiced plosives and vowel sounds eg /nba/
• Repeat a series of fricatives, nasal and vowel sounds /sma/
PHONATORY SYSTEM:
1. for phonatory incompetence:
• Pushing techniques
• Holding breath excercises
• Head turning toward the affected side
• Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)
• Smith accent method
2. Phonatory stenosis:
• Head and neck relaxation
• Easy onset of phonation
• Smith accent method: used for modification of both phonation and
respiration. It helps improve prosody and voice, breath control.
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM:
Below are few behavioural techniques used in treatment of respiratory
systems.
• Producing consistent subglottal pressure
• Pulling, pushing and bearing down during speech or nonspeech tasks
• Slow and controlled exhalation
• Optimal breath group
• Postural adjustment
• Smith accent method
f) Prosthetic appliances in treatment of childhood dysarthria:
• A prosthetic method refers to any physical alteration. A number of
mechanical and electronically prosthetic are available to improve speech
and/ or assist in communication.
• Some may be temporary - used only until physiologic recovery or the
effects of behavioural management allow them to be discarded.
Respiratory system:
• Prosthetic devices such as head, neck, chest/or abdomen straps, braces,
girdles are used to prop and maintain the patient in an upright or sitting
position and add stiffness to an otherwise flabby mechanism.
• Leaning into a flat surface during expiration or using an expiratory board or
paddle mounted on a wheelchair and swung into position at the abdominal
level may help increase reparatory force for speech.
Laryngeal system:
• Portable amplification system – Persons with inadequate loudness but
adequate articulation and those who have responded sub optimally to
behavioural intervention to improve loudness may benefit from this. Using
this, intelligibility improves.
• Artificial larynx: Some patients who are aphonic, severely breathy or lacking
sufficient respiratory support for speech but who have good articulation
skill may benefit from this.
• Neck braces or cervical collars: Patients with movement disorder or
significant neck weakness may benefit from this. It helps to stabilize the
head and neck during speech.
• Vocal intensity controller: can provide feedback about excessive or
inadequate loudness. This can be accomplished with a loudness monitoring
device that samples vocal intensity from throat microphone and provides
feedback if intensity is below a predetermined threshold. It is useful in mild
to moderate PD.
Resonatory/velopharyngeal system:
• Palatal lift prosthesis: Any dysarthric patient having moderate to severe
velopharyngeal paralysis and consequent valving incompetence may be an
excellent candidate for immediate fitting of the prosthesis.
This would facilitate VPC by mechanically displacing the velum upwards and
backwards, towards the posterior pharyngeal wall, where contact would
normally occur. This prosthesis is made up of light acrylic resin material
with holes for dental retention.
• Nose clip: Intelligibility improves by simply manually occluding the nares
during speech
• Nasal Obturator: inserted into the nares for the purpose of occluding nasal
airflow during speech, improves intelligibility in a person with flaccid
dysarthria
Articulatory system: A few prostheses are used to improve orofacial and
articulatory function:
• Jaw sling: is used to close mouth.
• Bite- block: is a small piece of acrylic material that is custom fitted and held
between the lateral upper and lower teeth. It is used to stabilize the jaw
and also helps to inhibit abnormal, involuntary movements.
• Delayed Auditory Feedback: is an instrumental procedure used to control
the rate of speech of the individual by giving feedback of the speech at
varying delayed intervals and is specially used with hyperkinetic dysarthria.
• Pacing devices can be useful in modifying rate.
g) AAC in management of motor speech disorders- role of devices, AAC team,
candidacy and pre-requisites, symbol selection, techniques, assessment for
AAC, effective use of AAC:
Augmentative and Alternative communication devices are any device that
facilitate or compensate, temporarily or permanently, any impairment or
disability in the production or comprehension of spoken or written language.
Classification of AAC:
Aided: Systems that utilize an external device.
• Light technology- communication boards, books, Tangible symbols,
symbol communication charts.
• Medium tech systems –devices containing a battery or a switch but
which are very simple.
Unaided: Systems are those which are independent of a device. Signs &
gesture systems
Role of AAC devices: AAC can play at least 4 different roles in early
intervention. The roles an AAC system plays will vary depending on an
individual child’s needs. These roles are as follows:
• Augmenting existing natural speech.
• Providing primary output mode for communication
• Providing an input and output mode for language and communication
• Serving as language intervention strategy.
AAC team:
Speech Language Pathologist: assess current speech, language and cognitive
skills, identify most appropriate AAC system, recommends advance
communication skills for potential use of AAC.
Occupational Therapist: recommends appropriate positioning, access,
environmental control units, identify switch-based activities.
Physiotherapist: recommends positioning, seating systems, wheel chair, etc.
Medical Nurse, Caregivers and family, Engineer and Special educators are also
a part of AAC team.
Candidacy and pre-requisites:
Candidates of AAC must possess certain pre requisites:
− Chronic expressive communication disorders.
− Adequate cognitive capabilities
− Adequate linguistic abilities
− individuals demonstrating impairments in gestural, spoken, and/or
written modalities
Assessment of individual is necessary to find if the person is a candidate of AAC
or not.
Pre-requisites:
There are no prerequisites to initiate an AAC intervention program. There are
prerequisites skills an augmented communicator should demonstrate before
he/she is given access to a sophisticated AAC device such as:
1. Fine motor skills
2. Sensori-motor integration
3. Cognitive functioning
4. Level of receptive communication
5. Current expressive communication including non-conventional behaviours.
6. Motivation level for communication
7. Persons with whom student desires to communicate
8. Student interests
4. Touch-cue method:
The touch-cue method uses tactile cues as well as simultaneous auditory and
visual cues.
It incorporates three stages of treatment, beginning with nonsense syllable
drills, then putting those learned movement sequences into both real and
nonsense words, emphasizing the distinctive feature contrasts, and finally, in
the third stage, moving to spontaneous speech.
Stage 1:
− If a child is capable of producing a phoneme in isolation
− Series of nonsense syllable drills
− Facilitate the teaching of the topographic cues,
− Developing accurate self-monitoring of productions.
Stage 2:
− Previously learned sequential movements into monosyllabic words using
the CVC configuration
− Real words and nonsense words that emphasize contrasts in place,
manner, and voicing aspects of productions
− Auditory, visual, and tactile cues is manipulated
− Faded throughout stage II, with the introduction of graphic or picture
stimuli
Stage 3:
− Apply the sequencing and self-monitoring to multiword utterances
− And then in spontaneous speech.
5. Speech facilitation:
The intraoral stimulations- facilitate tongue placement.
The intraoral stimulation is provided by six types of phonodental guides:
1. Oral acrylic modifiers
2. Orthrodontic wire guides
3. Denture guides
4. Dental floss guides (knotted and stretched)
5. Various types of stemmed wire guides
6. Cue sticks.
Extraoral manipulations- facilitate the movement involved in a phoneme
elicitation.
The finger and hand format involves placing a finger on the side of the nose to
cue nasalization, touching the larynx with the finger to cue phonation, and
pressing the palm of one hand below the client’s ribcage to cue breath
expiration, with the amount of hand pressure used to activate sudden or
gradual expiration. Four principles:
1. A rapport established between the ‘stimulator’ and respondent
2. Position and movement for each phoneme is taught.
3. Timing, rate, pressure, duration, & stress
4. Auditory and visual sensory stimuli
d) Gestural cueing techniques (signed target phoneme therapy, adapted
cueing techniques, cued speech, visual phonics, & Jordon’s gestures)
1.signed target phoneme therapy:
• Shelton and Graves (1985) used it for a 5 year old child with
Developmental Apraxia of Speech.
• Visual memory and an “internalized visual stimulus” could assist a child
with DAS in recalling what articulatory gestures to make
• The visual cues- hand shapes from the American Manual Alphabet
• Only the targeted phoneme(s) in a stimulus are cued gesturally by the
clinician
• The child is not required to produce the cue during his or her oral
response
• Both consonants and vowels are dealt within the technique
2. Adapted Cueing Techniques:
• Given by Klick (1985)
• Manually presenting visual cues created to accompany orally presented
speech
• Enhance oral stimuli and to increase the frequency of correct responses
for both consonants and vowels on the part of the client, particularly
during sequential speech movements
• Vowels are cued along two dimensions, which are the place of
articulation and the degree of jaw closure
• All vowels are signalled by variations of the letter c hand shape. The
hand is held with the fingers pointing towards the cheek.
• Jaw closure is represented by the degree of closure between the fingers
and thumb of the c hand shape.
• Moving the hand toward the front, middle, or back of the oral tract cues
placement.
3. Cued Speech
• given by Cornett (1972)
• Differentiate each speech sound with a set of 12 cues: 8 hand shapes
and 4 basic hand positions, which, when used in combination, result in
total of 32 possible cues.
• Hand shapes represents consonants from different viseme groups
• Hand positions involves four locations about the face
4. Visual Phonics
• International Communication Learning Institute (1981)
• Visual and kinaesthetic method using a system of hand signs and written
symbols was developed
• 45 signs or sounds are tested and subsequently taught.
• Progress from production in isolation to production in words and then to
sentences.
5. Jordan’s gestures: Jordan (1988, 1991).
• Point of constriction within the oral cavity necessary for production of
the target consonant sound
e) Miscellaneous techniques (melodic intonation therapy, multiple phonemic
approach, & instrumental feedback)
Melodic Intonation Therapy:
Melodic Intonation Therapy would be classified as a rate-and-rhythm type of
apraxia treatment. It is based on the observation that individuals with aphasia
or apraxia of speech can sing the words of a song much better than they can
say the same words in conversation.
In the MIT program, the rhythm and melody aspects of the program are
emphasized primarily in the beginning steps of the program. The patient’s
intonation is then modified into a more natural prosody in the final steps.
Good candidates for this program are those who
− experienced a stroke
− have non-fluent aphasia/restricted verbal output,
− have good auditory comprehension
− demonstrate poor articulation and repetition abilities and are
motivated.
− adequate attention span.
The MIT program is divided into three levels
The overall sequence of treatment is to first incorporate melodic intonation
into the target utterances, then gradually shift to saying the words with
exaggerated prosody, and finally saying the words with normal prosody.
1.Elementary Level
• First the clinician demonstrates the melody by humming and singing the
target word. The clinician taps the patient’s hand on each syllable of the
word or phrase. The patient does not respond, but only listens carefully.
• The clinician and patient sing the target word and tap out the syllables
together.
• The clinician and patient begin by singing and tapping the word
together, but the clinician stops about halfway through. The patient is
required to complete the word alone.
• The clinician sings and taps the target first; the patient then repeats it
immediately.
• When the patient repeats the word from Step 4, the clinician
immediately asks a question such as, “What did you say?” The patient
attempts to say the target word in response to this question.
2.Intermediate Level:
• The four steps of this level follow the general sequence found in the
elementary level, except that delay of several seconds are inserted
between the clinician’s presentation of the target word and the patient’s
response.
• The length and complexity of the target words and phrases in this level
are approximately the same as in the elementary level
3.Advanced Level:
• The steps in this portion of the program also concentrate on the delayed
repetition of target phrases.
• However, the melody used in the patient’s utterances is now modified to
match normal speech intonation through a procedure called speech-
song.
• The words are not actually sung in a melody.
• In the final step, the clinician asks a question, the patient waits about 6
seconds, and then answers with the correct target phrase using normal
intonation
Multiple phonemic approach:
It is a horizontal approach to the treatment of articulation disorders.
The approach was developed by McCabe and Bradley in 1975 at the University
of North Carolina
It involves working on multiple targets within one session, either individually or
simultaneously, at a less intense practice level. This provides more exposure to
not only multiple sounds but also helps to facilitate generalization and
carryover as it works largely with coarticulation and connected speech.
Consist of three phases: Establishment, Generalization, Maintenance
Phase 1: establishment: the goal of phase 1 is to elicit correct productions of
the target sounds and then stabilize them at a voluntary level in order to
facilitate generalization or transfer.
Phase 2: Generalization: it is designed to facilitate the carryover or
generalization process on multiple levels including: position, contextual,
linguistic unit, sound, situational.
Typically, therapy at this phase follows the progression of linguistic units.
Phase 3: maintenance:
It involves stabilizing the sound productions learned earlier.
The process of stabilization ensures that the corrected sound production will
persist even after being discharged from the therapy and moving to a new
target sound.
Instrumental feedback:
Also known as biofeedback, it refers to feedback of a physiological function,
usually by providing visual information about an individuals performace.
It is useful in non speech motor learning. Biofeedback approaches such as
spectrograms and electropalatography have been used in treatment for
children with SSD.
A study funded by Apraxia Kids was the first to investigate the use visual
feedback of the tongue as a way to teach production of speech sounds for
school-age children with CAS.
This study involved using ultrasound to provide a real-time visual display of the
tongue while children talk
In this approach, the ultrasound transducer is held under the chin, and the
ultrasound images are then used to teach children how to move their tongue
into different positions to produce certain speech movements.
Speech-language pathologists can use this information to provide the child
with cues about the tongue.
g) Other approaches: Vowel and diphthong remediation techniques
(Northampton (Yale) vowel chart and Alcorn symbols), Nancy Kauffman’s
speech praxis treatment kit
Vowel and Diphthong Remediation Techniques:
1. Northampton (YALE) Vowel Chart
• Davis and Hardick (1981); revised in 1925
• Visual, written (printed) cues to facilitate speech production are used.
• Orthographic symbols are present consisting of letters of the English
alphabet : Consonants and vowels
• Vowels into three groups – back round vowels, front vowels, and
diphthongs – and is used as an articulation/pronunciation guide.
• These symbols are presented along with an auditory presentation of the
targeted vowel phoneme
2. Alcorn Symbols:
• Given by Streng (1955)
• Visually represent the mouth shapes assumed during production of
vowels and diphthongs
• Help the child is to associate the written symbol and the oral movement
(Davis and Hardick, 1981)
• Useful for Very young children
• The symbols can also be combined with letters
Oesophagus:
• The oesophagus is a muscular tube lined with mucosa that propels food
from the hypopharynx to the stomach.
• The upper oesophageal sphincter (UES) forms the junction between the
hypopharynx and the oesophagus.
• The lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) forms the junction between the
oesophagus and the stomach.
• It has three constrictors:
i. At pharyngo-oesopharyngeal junction- 15 cm from the upper
incisors
ii. At crossing of arch of aorta and left main bronchus- 25 cm from
upper incisors
iii. Where it pierces diaphragm- 40 cm from upper incisors
• The wall of the oesophagus has four layers from within outwards they
are:
- Mucosa: innermost and lined with stratified squamous epithelium
- Submucosa: it connects the mucosa and muscular layer
- Muscular layer: it has inner circular fibers and outer longitudinal fibers
- Fibrous layer: it forms the loose covering of the oesophagus
anatomic difference between adults and children
c) Physiology of swallowing- swallow phases, neural control of swallowing,
reflexes related to swallowing, suckling and sucking, airway and swallowing
Physiology of swallowing:
There are three phases:
1. Oral phase: It is divided into two phases:
a. Oral preparatory phase:
- In this phase, the food is broken down in the oral-cavity and is mixed
with saliva to form a bolus.
- This involves repeated transfer of food from oral cavity to oropharyngeal
surface of tongue.
b. Oral phase proper:
- During this phase, the bolus is moved on the back side of the tongue.
- The soft palate covers the nasopharynx to prevent regurgitation.
- The tongue tip and blade elevates towards the hard palate causing
depression in the posterior part which helps in swallowing and sending
the bolus to the pharynx.
2. Pharyngeal Phase:
- During this phase, the soft palate raises to cover nasopharynx.
- As food enters pharynx, trachea is sealed by epiglottis securing the
airway and preventing bolus from entering trachea.
- Contraction of pharyngeal constrictor muscles, propels food downwards
into the oesophagus.
3. Oesophageal phase:
- As the bolus contacts the upper sphincter, it opens and allows the entry
of bolus into the oesophagus.
- A peristaltic wave is initiated at the upper end which helps the bolus to
propel downwards.
- As the bolus reaches the lower sphincter, it opens and allows the entry
of bolus into the stomach.
Neural control of swallowing
Following cranial nerves are involved in swallowing:
• Trigeminal (cranial nerve V)
• Facial (cranial nerve VII)
• Glossopharyngeal (cranial nerve IX)
• Vagus (cranial nerve X)
• Hypoglossal nerve (cranial nerve XII)
• The oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing would be produced by
muscular contraction, and coordinated by a control center in the
brainstem.
• the cerebral cortex is not essential to the pharyngeal and esophageal
phases although the cerebral cortex appears to facilitate the oral phase
and the initiation of the pharyngeal phase.
• Neural control involves:
• afferent sensory fibers contained in cranial nerves,
• cerebral, midbrain, and cerebellar fibers that synapse with the brain-
stem swallowing centers,
• the paired swallowing centers in the brain stem, and
• efferent motor fibers contained in cranial nerves
- Afferent Pathways:
- Sensory input is stressed as necessary for accurate motor control.
Sensory information is processed during planning, executing, and
evaluating an action. Concepts of sensory feedback and predictions prior
to confirmation seem especially significant for oropharyngeal
swallowing.
- Primary afferents from the receptors in the oropharyngeal mucosa travel
in the trigeminal (V), glossopharyngeal (IX), and vagus nerves (X), and
converge in the solitary tract destined for synaptic contact with second-
order neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS). The swallowing
reflex elicited by primary afferents may be modified by lung/chest wall
receptors such as vagal and intercostals muscle afferents.
- Efferent pathways:
- Central Control Which Includes Central Pattern Generator
• The infant’s oral structures and functions, including palatal integrity, jaw
movement, and tongue movements for cupping and compression.
(Note: Lip closure is not required for infant feeding because the tongue
typically seals the anterior opening of the oral cavity.)
• The infant’s ability to turn the head and open the mouth (rooting) when
stimulated on the lips or cheeks and to accept a pacifier into the mouth.
• The infant’s ability to use both compression (positive pressure of the jaw
and tongue on the pacifier) and suction (negative pressure created with
tongue cupping and jaw movement).
• The infant’s compression and suction strength.
• The infant’s ability to maintain a stable physiological state (e.g., oxygen
saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate) during NNS.
These cues can communicate the infant’s ability to tolerate bolus size, the
need for more postural support, and if swallowing and breathing are no longer
synchronized.
Breastfeeding: In addition to the clinical evaluation of infants noted above,
breastfeeding assessment typically includes an evaluation of the
• infant’s general health and medical comorbidities;
• infant’s current state, including respiratory rate and heart rate;
• infant’s behavior ex. positive rooting, willingness to suckle at breast
• infant’s position (e.g., well supported, tucked against the mother’s
body);
• efficiency and coordination of the infant’s suck/swallow/breathe
pattern;
• mother’s behavior (e.g., comfort with breastfeeding, confidence in
handling the infant, awareness of the infant’s cues during feeding).
Bottle-Feeding: The assessment of bottle-feeding includes an evaluation of the
• move their head toward the spoon and then open their mouth,
• turn their head away from the spoon to show that they have had
enough,
• close their lips around the spoon,
• clear food from the spoon with their top lip,
• move food from the spoon to the back of their mouth, and
• attempt to spoon-feed independently.
The clinical evaluation for infants: from birth to 1 year of age—including those
in the NICU—includes an evaluation of pre-feeding skills, an assessment of
readiness for oral feeding, an evaluation of breastfeeding and bottle-feeding
ability, and observations of caregivers feeding the child.
The clinical evaluation of infants typically involves
• a case history, which includes
o gestational and birth history and
o pertinent medical history;
• a physical examination, which includes
o a developmental assessment,
o a respiratory status assessment, and
o an assessment of sucking/swallowing problems and a
determination of abnormal anatomy and/or physiology that might
be associated with these findings (
• a determination of oral feeding readiness;
• an assessment of the infant’s ability to engage in non-nutritive sucking
(NNS);
• developmentally appropriate clinical assessments of feeding and
swallowing behavior (nutritive sucking [NS]), as appropriate;
• an identification of additional disorders that may have an impact on
feeding and swallowing;
• a determination of the optimal feeding method;
• an assessment of issues related to fatigue and volume limitations;
• an assessment of the effectiveness of parent/caregiver and infant
interactions for feeding and communication; and
• consideration of the infant’s ability to obtain sufficient
nutrition/hydration across settings (e.g., hospital, home, day care
setting).
ASSESSMENT SCALES:
• Mealtime Behavior Questionnaire (MBQ):
• Oral Motor Assessment Scale (OMAS):
• Pre-Speech Assessment Scale (PSAS):
• Pediatric Assessment Scale for Severe Feeding Problems (PASSFP)
• Schedule of Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA)
• Screening Tool of Feeding Problems, modified for children (STEP-Child).
1.Mealtime Behavior Questionnaire (MBQ):
• age: 2 to 6 yrs
• specific population: feeding problems
• measures: meal time behaviors
• administered by: caregiver
• format: observation
2.Oral Motor Assessment Scale (OMAS):
• age: 3 to 13 yrs
• specific population: cerebral palsy
• measures: Oral Motor Skills
• administered by: clinician
• format: observation and history
h) Management: positioning, oral- motor treatment, team approach, non-
oral feeding, transitional feeding, modifications in feeding
Oral-motor treatment:
• Oral–motor treatments include stimulation to—or actions of—the lips,
jaw, tongue, soft palate, pharynx, larynx, and respiratory muscles.
• Oral–motor treatments range from passive (e.g., tapping, stroking, and
vibration) to active (e.g., range-of-motion activities, resistance exercises,
or chewing and swallowing exercises).
• Oral–motor treatments are intended to influence the physiologic
underpinnings of the oropharyngeal mechanism in order to improve its
functions. Some of these interventions can also incorporate sensory
stimulation
• Beckmann oral motor approach
- provide assisted movements to activate muscle contraction and to
provide movement against resistance to build strength.
- to increase functional response to pressure and movement, range,
strength and variety and control of movement for the lips, cheeks, jaw
and tongue using assisted movement and stretch reflexes.
- Development of oral motor skills enhances the progression from breast
milk or formula, then to pureed food and to table foods as well as the
skills needed to progress from sucking a nipple to using a wide variety of
utensils i.e. straws, cups, spoons and forks.
Non-oral Feeding:
NNS involves allowing an infant to suck without taking milk, either at the
breast (after milk has been expressed) or with the use of a pacifier. It is used as
a treatment option to encourage eventual oral intake.
Steps involved are:
• Place a gloved finger or a pacifier in the infant’s mouth
• Press firmly 4-6 times (1-2 times per second) on the middle of the
tongue
• Pause to see if the infant continues unassisted sucking
• Repeat as tolerated.
Transitional Feeding:
NNS and Oral Feeding Readiness:
Rule of Thumb:
If the infant can produce non-nutritive suck, he/she may be able to produce a
nutritive suck.
If the infant cannot produce non-nutritive suck, he/she may be able to produce
a non-nutritive suck and is not ready for oral feed.
Repeated trials at oral feeding prior to infant readiness may actually delay
development of oral feeding skills.
Readiness for oral feeding—Toddlers and older children who are beginning to
eat orally for the first time or after an extended period of non-oral feeding will
need time to become comfortable in the presence of food
tube feeding:
Tube feeding includes alternative avenues of intake such as
• nasogastric [NG] tube,
• transpyloric tube (placed in the duodenum or jejunum),
• gastrostomy (G-tube placed in the stomach or GJ-tube placed in the
jejunum).
• These approaches may be considered if the child’s swallowing safety and
efficiency cannot reach a level of adequate function or does not
adequately support nutrition and hydration.
• Physiologically stable preterm infants, are generally transitioned from
tube feeding to oral feeding at 32–34 weeks gestational age. This
transition may take days to weeks
• Success in this transition, defined as adequate intake for growth and
maintenance of physiologic stability, depends on several factors:
• (a) the infant's neurological and physiological maturity, namely, the
infant's ability to remain engaged in feeding, organize oral-motor
functioning, co-ordinate swallowing with breathing, and maintain
physiologic stability