38092-Article Text-112070-3-10-20210420
38092-Article Text-112070-3-10-20210420
http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej
Correspondence Address: p-ISSN 2087-0108
Kampus UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 95 C
e-ISSN 2502-4566
E-mail : [email protected]
643
Lilis Sulistyowati, et al./ English Education Journal EEJ 10 (4) (2020) 643-653
Pidana (RKUHP)” or the Draft of the Book The Cancellation of Ratification Several
Criminal Law. The cartoons posted at Draft of the Book of Criminal Law
“Poliklitik.com” were viral and controversial in
Indonesia during September 2019.
METHODS
asks for help by answering “ask to netizens”. The The Draft of the Book Criminal Law on
pull-quote at the bottom of the cartoon states that Livestock
“He said postponed-Hopefully not only
postponed-Want to be optimistic, but I am
hesitant.” From these analyses, it can be
concluded that the cartoonist wants to convey
abusive content that the government can not
decide the right action without worrying about
the bad netizen reaction and the untrusted
people on the government's capabilities in
saying his doubt.
Discourse practice
Figure 2 was released on the 21st of
September 2019, attracting 4,010 likes and 260
comments. From the comments, 75% of
netizen give a strong reaction by choosing the
option D (dissolving the House of
Representatives). They argue that DPR does
not represent the citizens. The comments of this
cartoon direct to satire the House of
Representative capabilities in conducting their
functions.
Sociocultural discourse
Figure 3. livestock inspires Poliklitik.com
The issues concerning adultery and
cartoonist to create
LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and
Transgender) in the Draft of the Book Criminal
Text analysis
Law have been discussing since 2018. These
The viral and controversial article on the
issues emerge due to the anti-homosexual that
Draft of the Book Criminal Law talking about
proclamation in Yogyakarta
livestock inspires Poliklitik.com cartoonist to
(Polymenopoulou, 2018). Several articles
create this figure 3. Based on the Article 278, it
relating to the criminalization of sex outside
is mentioned that every person who allows
marriage and homosexuals, including LGBT,
farmed poultry entering a garden or land
the broader area in this draft, become pro and
sprinkled with seeds or plants belonging to
contra. The pro-people consider that LGBT
someone else is liable to a maximum fine of
and adultery are unsuitable and break up the
Category II (Rp. 10 million) as Article 278.
religious norms and social norms. Not only
Worse, Article 279, Paragraph 2 states that the
Muslims as a majority religion, but also all
state can forcibly seize livestock involved in
religions forbid this behavior. The contra-side is
violating this article. The visual text then
voiced out by Human Rights activists as a
shows that a person is mad due to a man
mushroom LGBT community to protect their
standing his motorcycle on his land by
sexual and identity. They argue that personal
saying his objection. He is pointing his
identity is basic of the sexual human right
hand while mentioning the content of 278
protected by international laws (Muthmainnah,
articles. The cartoonist asks the reader to
2016). Then, the controversy and tug of war in
think deeply by giving illustrations
the House of Representatives and the public
supported the verbal language that adapts
related the issues lasted until September 2019.
647
Lilis Sulistyowati, et al./ English Education Journal EEJ 10 (4) (2020) 643-653
Discourse practice
Figure 3 was released on the 24th of
September 2019, attracting 11,540 likes and 227
comments. Concluding the comments, netizens
mostly use LOL (laugh at loud) or its emoticon
( ) to laugh at the interpretation of the draft
of the Book Criminal Law on livestock. This
draft is considered funny and one of the foolest
drafts. The netizens ask farmers to send their
animals to school to satire the draft composer.
Sharpen their opinions; they would catch
livestock that entered the yard and get 10
million in fines. They also think they will get
rich quickly because many animals enter their
yard if it happens every day.
648
Lilis Sulistyowati, et al./ English Education Journal EEJ 10 (4) (2020) 643-653
Discourse Practice
Figure 5 was released on the 20th of
September 2019 that gets 6,109 likes and 121
Figure 5. The Draft of the Book Criminal Law
comments. This comment generally laughed at
on Land
the silliness of the conditions experienced by
the lower class. The use of emoticons applause
Text analysis
( ) rated joined strengthen innuendo
The satirical in figure 3 is created to deal
with congratulations on the condition,
with the situation in society about the article on
although not all pro to the cartoon's contents.
the Draft of the Book Criminal Law on land
Some netizens are pro with government
and become controversial because it is
649
Lilis Sulistyowati, et al./ English Education Journal EEJ 10 (4) (2020) 643-653
policies that are considered firm and Ratificat govern Represent polite
appropriate for eviction rated highly needed for ion ment ative norm
road widening and the people’s interest.
The The The The draft
Sociocultural practice Draft of using of netizens infringes
Construction of public facilities such as the Book polyse consider the
toll roads, road widening, MRT, etc. made the Crimina my that it is cultural
government displace community land. This l Law on sharpen the foolest live in
sometimes becomes a dispute in society. Based Livestoc s the draft Indonesi
on Data.com survey results, the increase of k satirical made by a
inland disputes is significant during 2014-2019. message the House
conveye of
d by the Represent
cartooni ative
st
The The The The
Draft of cartooni netizens content
the Book st uses laughed at consider
Crimina the the s
l Law on ironic silliness of detrimen
Land situatio the tal to
n to condition society
satire s
Figure 6. Land Conflict Total Land Conflict the draft experienc
(2014-2019) ed by the
Source: Agrarian Reform Consortium, 2019 lower
class.
From the data on Figure 6, land conflict
cases have fluctuated years to years. Citizens
From Table 1, we can conclude that the
consider that the Draft of Book Criminal Law
cartoonists use satire as an artistic weapon to
in land detrimental to the community because
knives the people's opinion and attack the
evicted landowners will be jailed if they do not
prevalent social vices to sanitize them. They use
comply with the government's wants.
the visual and verbal text to deliver their
Satirical messages from the data above
satirical messages with humor and situation
can be summarized in the following table:
familiar with Indonesian citizens, i.e., the
handling of a quiz “Who Wants to be A
Table 1. Satirical Messages
Millionaire” to describe the decision making of
Data Text Discourse Sociocul
the Draft Criminal Law that considered as a
Analysi Practice tural
game by the government as the micro-level.
s Practice
Then, to sharpen the messages, they also use
The Decisio The LGBT
polysemy to get the humour sense to satire the
Cancella n netizens consider
government's decision. In the third political
tion of making underesti s break
cartoon about the Draft of the Book criminal
Draft of is mate the up
Law on Land, the cartoonist uses an ironic
the Book conside capabilitie religion
situation drawn using jail to abuse this draft.
of red a s of the norm
Furthermore, the netizens of political cartoons'
Crimina game by House of and
comments can be seen as public reactions to
l Law the
650
Lilis Sulistyowati, et al./ English Education Journal EEJ 10 (4) (2020) 643-653
their particular current issues. It has purposed Relating to the theory of language as a
to catch their thought about those issues as the form of social practice, this CDA concerns
miso-level. After many drafts, the sociocultural using language to discuss the social and
that happened to citizens rolled out to them that political issues and their imbalance in social life
related trust issues to government and DPR as (Matin, 2017). Through the language, the CDA
the macro-level on the analysis. is used to analyze the spoken and written text
For the last decades, Indonesia citizens in the part of their discursive source of power
have to encounter the public trust crisis to the within specific social, political, and historical
House of Representative (DPR) in carrying out contexts (Bukhari, 2013). The existence of
its legislative function based on its poor political cartoons is a media discourse that is
performance because it is considered used to manipulate language effectively and
detrimental to society. For example, several persuasively in evoking a particular response,
draft and revised laws have drawn controversy which leads public opinion with a different
from the public. Student demonstrations and point of view that is expected to bring the
mass movements occurred on September 23-24, positive changes (Sani et al., 2012). Alongside
2019, as an act of rejection of efforts to weaken the picture, the cartoonist also creates the
the Corruption Eradication Commission and bubbles text to harness the message conveyed
several draft criminal laws that were considered (Paramita, 2018) based on what and how the
to favour the political elite (Kompas, 2019). events underlying the political cartoons (Sani et
The trust issues also strengthen many al., 2012). For instance, in this study, the irony
parliaments members cases and have been between the condition of the majority of the
jailed by the Corruption Eradication lower-level society in Indonesia is against The
Commission (KPK) account for their Draft of the Book Criminal Law relating three
corruption acts. People can monitor the news articles on ratification of human rights,
on TV that KPK catches 24 of the House of livestock, and land.
Representative members 2014-2019 period Generally, political cartoons'
(Databoks, 2018). From many social media, contribution enriches the media discourse that
netizens also can see many DPR members are is creatively used as communicative means in
sleeping during their meetings, and many chairs conveying the message embedded in a broader
are empty in their conference. context to the public (Willems, 2011).
The satirical content on the cartoons in Therefore, it offers an interesting source of data
figures 1, 2, and 3 is a part of the critical for studying media discourse and its usage.
discourse analysis. Critical discourse analysis Furthermore, it provides a research area
(CDA) is defined as “a type of discourse relating to social relationships, linguistics,
analytical research that primarily studies the social experiences, and so on. Nevertheless, in
way social power abuse, dominance, and studying political cartoons, it requires more
inequality are enacted, reproduced and resisted supportive theories to encounter the problem in
by text, and talk in the social and political analyzing political cartoons (Sani et al., 2012).
context ” (Van Dijk, 2001). Then, in the Moreover, in future studies, the political
modern CDA, it intends to discuss discourse cartoons should be analyzed through several
and racism, discourse and ideology, and theories or other experts to harness the
discourse and knowledge, including the understanding of the particular social
integration of social and cognitive approaches phenomenon and how they evoke public
(Al-Momani, 2017). Based on the Fairclough opinions.
(1989) theory, this interdisciplinary theory
argued, “language as a form of social practice
”.
651
Lilis Sulistyowati, et al./ English Education Journal EEJ 10 (4) (2020) 643-653
653