s10163 023 01617 8
s10163 023 01617 8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01617-8
REVIEW
Abstract
Phosphogypsum (PG) waste is a by-product generated from wet-process phosphoric acid ( H3PO4) manufacturing during
phosphate rock decomposition. Worldwide, the annual production of PG ranges between 100 and 300 million tons, with
only a few quantities utilized in several application domains (about 15%), the unused PG is usually discharged into the sea
or stocked in large stockpiles with potential serious human and environmental risks. Therefore, in this review article, we
have studied and discussed the possible alternative ways for PG waste recycling and use. Indeed, this waste material could
be considered as a mineral resource of secondary raw materials within the scope of a circular economy. An inclusive bib-
liographic search, dealing with our review’s objectives, was performed according to the two famous-databases: Web of Sci-
ences and Scopus. After different selecting processes, about 153 articles are found. PG is used in several sectors, including
agriculture, as well as in the brick and cement industry, and road construction. Other applications are reported in this study
such as PG conversion to valuable products and rare earths elements (REEs) extraction. In the same context and in the sense
of reducing greenhouse gasses emissions (GHGs), PG is often used as a calcium source for CO2 mineral sequestration. In
addition, different methods of treatment and purification, techno-economic, life cycle and environmental assessment of the
PG recycling, and valorization technologies are summarized and reported in this review. Finally, recent technologies used
for extracting REEs from PG were investigated. The main results, conclusions, and recommendations reported here could
considered as a guide for future studies, and also should be of benefit to scientists, chemists and engineers interested in the
utilization/ treatment of PG.
* Brahim Bouargane
[email protected]
1
LGP, Chemical Department, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Zohr
University, B.P.: 8106, Agadir, Morocco
2
LME, Chemical Department, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Zohr
University, B.P.: 8106, Agadir, Morocco
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Graphical Abstract
Keywords Phosphogypsum · Waste · Conversion · Purification · Solubility · REEs · Life cycle assessment
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Fig. 2 “Phosphogypsum” scientific production as function of: scientific databases (a), years (between 1941 and 2022 results from Scopus Data-
base available at: http://www.scopus.com) (b), scientific areas (c) and countries (d)
databases (between 2012 and 2022). In this period This increase in the PG publication is to find friendly
about 3602 publications are found; routes for PG management, purification, and valorization in
– In Fig. 2b: the number of publications related to the different application domains.
key search “phosphogypsum” between 1941 and 2022 In continuation, the literature review procedure is as
for the Scopus database. This figure shows a noticeable follow:
lack of scientific publications in the period of 1941 to
1970, despite the fact that superphosphates industry has (1) Filtration process: an important number of publications
significantly increased since the Second World War. were identified by selecting the different keywords
The first publications related to PG start to appear only related to the review objective such as valorization,
after 1975. After this period, an exponential increase in management, application, waste, characterization, recy-
the number of articles published from 1975 till today, cling, solubility, agriculture, building, environment,
especially from 2000 to 2022 is clearly noticed. pollution, treatment, carbon dioxide, carbonation, life
– In Fig. 2c: the results are given also as function of the cycle assessment, economic challenge.
scientific areas. Globally, a high proportion of scientific (2) Scanning process: after the filtration process, a scan-
publications are common to many scientific areas; ning process was performed basing on the titles and
– In Fig. 2d: finally, the results are given by countries. abstracts of the above selected publications.
It is remarkably that about five countries contribute (3) Papers selection process: as the subject of this work is
to ~ 50% of the scientific production: China, Spain, “Effective and innovative procedures to use phospho-
Poland, Brazil, and India. gypsum waste in different application domains”, we
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
have favorably and globally used the recently published simple dissolution in chloride solutions [44, 45]. Numer-
articles. This search is resulting in 153 analyzed publi- ous investigations considered the solubility of SG and PG
cations. in aqueous solutions as described in Table 2. The proce-
dure used in these investigations is shown in Fig. 3.
This paper presents also a brief study on the application The study of PG solubility in multicomponent elec-
of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology, to assess trolyte aqueous solutions is of significant importance
environmental impacts of PG use and management. Gen- in many disciplines in science and engineering. Basing
erally, the application of LCA in this field is not largely in the literature, it can be seen, that PG solubility was
reported. For that, this review attempts to discuss and ana- studied in different aqueous solutions such as: deionized
lyze the most important decisions taken in recent LCA stud- water, sea water, sodium, potassium and ammonium chlo-
ies. We describe here (See Sect. “Techno-economical and ride solutions. The maximum concentrations of sulfate
life cycle assessment”) several LCA methods, by reporting (SO42−) that can be extracted from PG are around 1600
their procedures (Software, data-base, indicators, param- and 1900 mg L −1 using respectively deionized and sea
eters, etc.) and giving the final results for each method. water [46]. While, the highest value of solubility (about
2600 mg L −1 of S O 42−) was obtained in a salt solution
containing 25 g L −1 of NaCl [51]. Thus, using water with
Solubility studies of phosphogypsum a high salt content (sea water or treated brine water) has
the advantages of improving PG solubility and exerting
The solubility measurement of PG and synthetic gyp- lesser pressure on water resources [47]. In diluted acidic
sum (SG) is the widely used information to describe the medium (nitric, hydrochloric and sulfuric) the solubility
behavior and the optimal parameters influencing the dis- constant of PG reaches 3.14 × 10−5 [48]. For this purpose,
solution of this waste in different solutions [43]. It is also the leaching of PG in acidic solutions is of great interest
of particular importance in chloride hydrometallurgy and in order to extract add-value REEs elements. Generally,
numerous conversion processes, such as the manufacture there is a strong correlation between PG solubility and
of sodium, potassium and ammonium sulfate from PG by acid leaching efficiency [49].
SGa Acetic acid 0.25 30 13.5b Solubility increases with increasing [51]
Oxalic acid 14.5b acid for a concentration less than
0.25 M and decreases again at higher
Tartaric acid 9b
concentration
Succinic acid 6.5b
SG Nitric acid 0 to 30c 60 4.5 Variation of gypsum solubility in [52]
nitric acid passes through a maxi-
mum in the range 22–25 wt.% H NO3
SG HCl-CaCl2 mixture 1 10 to 80 1 Parameters investigated are: [53]
HCl concentration up to 5 M, C aCl2
concentration up to 2 M and tem-
perature
SG HCl 3 80 47 Parameters investigated are: [45]
HCl 3 25 24 HCl concentration up to 6 M, and KCl
concentration up to 180 g L–1
KCl 130d 25 9
SG NaCl 1 70 0.1b High solubility of PG in chloride [50]
solutions basically attributed to ionic
strength effects but temperature
changes have relatively minor effect
PG 25 25 5.3 Optimal concentration is 25 g L−1 of [54]
NaCl
PG and NG e Pure water and lime solution Saturated solution 35 2 Solubility of PG is different to that [55]
of NG due to the presence of some
impurities such as heavy metals and
radionuclides
a
Synthetic gypsum, bhere given as [SO42−], c(wt%), d(g L−1), enatural gypsum
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Fig. 3 PG solubility measurements, where: SG (Synthetic gypsum), M(G)before (Gypsum mass before dissolution), M(G)after (Gypsum mass after
dissolution), Vsolution (Volume of the chloride solution) and X2SO4 (corresponding salt)
In order to better understand the impact of the PG stor- solutions [59]. In all cases, there are two essential treatment
age parameters (in stacks or stockpiles), it is necessary to categories of PG: thermal and wet treatment.
study separately the impact of each parameter (e.g., ionic Several studies have been conducted to purify the PG
strength, Temperature, pH, and conductivity) on the PG sta- waste, improve its quality, and enhance its efficiency to
bility and solubility. The most influential parameters are the accommodate it in many industries: the manufacture of com-
ionic strength and pH, while the temperature changes have posite plaster and Portland cement slag for example [60].
relatively less impact [50]. Taher et al. have studied the thermal behavior of Egyptian
PG at different temperatures [61]. The treated Egyptian PG
was found to contain fewer impurities in P 2O5, fluorides,
Treatment and purification of PG waste and organic matter than raw PG. Likewise, El Issiouy et al.
2013 tested the Moroccan PG, recommending an efficient
The most common PG process involves chemical (pyromet- approach to maximize the elimination of undesirable gas-
allurgical/hydrometallurgical), physical, and thermal treat- ses and volatile impurities. The thermally treated PG was
ment for separation and extraction of critical elements such recommended to be used in the production of sulfuric acid
rare earth elements (REEs), heavy metals and radionuclides. [62]. The thermally purified Tunisian PG presents some
The PG treatment methods are very useful in extracting all strong characteristics that encourage and facilitate its use as
relevant impurities and toxic elements in this by-product a replacement for natural gypsum in the plastering industry
[56]. It is possible to use PG in agriculture and clinker [57, [63]. Generally, drying PG at 60 °C removes free water from
58] instead of natural gypsum by applying appropriate pre- the sample without losing structural water in gypsum [23,
treatment such as flotation, calcination, and wash with acidic 64].
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Generally, all PG dehydration studies using differential phosphorous [75]. A mixture of N a2O:Al2O3:SiO2:H2O
thermal and thermogravimetric analysis (DTA-TGA) indi- (zeolite hydrosodalite) was added to PG, to neutralize its
cate the presence of two anhydrite and hemihydrate associ- acidic impurities. This mechanical activation was suggested
ated endothermic peaks. However, the reported values of to stabilize the properties of the PG and improve its strength
the corresponding temperatures are remarkably different as characteristics [76]. The use of Margin (an industrial by-
peaks were obtained at 130–180, 180–215, and 149–169 °C product less polluting than PG) in the treatment of PG has
[62, 65].The dehydration of pure gypsum takes place in also found its place in the new pre-treatment methods. The
several stages. El Issiouy et al., 2013 find peaks relating to purified PG should be able to be used directly in agricultural
gypsum dehydration separately and precisely, 2 endothermic activities because of the presence of water and organic mat-
peaks at 125 °C and 140 °C corresponding to the dehydra- ter only [75].
tion of dihydrated calcium sulfate to hemihydrate (plaster)
and then to anhydrite III, reflecting a change in the crystal
structure (Gypsum: Monoclinic → Anhydrite II: Hexagonal): Applications and environmental risks of PG
1st peak (endothermic) at 125 °C:
The general recommendations for managing PG indicate its
CaSO.4 2H2 O(s) → CaSO.4 0.5H2 O(s) + 1.5 H2 O(g) (R1) valorization as the main way for minimizing storage costs
2nd peak (endothermic) at 140 °C: and for reducing the negative environmental effects caused
by this waste [77]. In agriculture, natural gypsum has long
CaSO.4 0.5H2 O(s) → CaSO4 (III)(s) + 0.5 H2 O(g) (R2) been used as a fertilizer for many crops. Some authors have
shown that for many crops, PG is as effective as natural
3rd peak (exothermic) between 320 and 450 °C corre- gypsum. However, the quantities to be used are limited
sponds to crystallographic transformation (anhydrite III: by certain standards [78]. This waste is also used as a soil
orthorhombic → anhydrite II: hexagonal): improver, when deficient in calcium and sulfur, but also for
CaSO4 (s)(III) → CaSO4 (s)(II) (R3) sodic soil permutation, which has been amended by replac-
ing excess sodium with calcium on the soil exchange com-
On the other hand, the impurities existing in PG could plexes (due to the high content in some elements such as
be removed by simple techniques such as washing with dis- Ca, P and S existing in PG). For this purpose, PG is used
tilled, tap or seawater [40]. A significant amount of soluble by peanut growers in various countries. Saline soils, once
impurities have been successfully reduced by three to five treated with PG, regain suitable physical and chemical char-
water washes at a liquid /solid ratio (v/w) of 2:1 (ratio of the acteristics [57, 79]. Other advantages of PG utilization in
water volume per g of PG: 2 ml/g) [66–68]. Similar find- this area are listed in Table 3.
ings have been reported by Liu et al., which confirm that The plaster manufacturing industry is one of the most
all undesirable impurities can be considerably eliminated explored avenues for the development of PG. As noted
by a simple washing technique with deionized water for the above, PG can replace natural gypsum in several industries,
possible use of PG in cemented paste backfill (CPB)[69]. but it is necessary to remove soluble impurities (phosphate,
The less extensive cleaning of PG by rinsing with water, or fluoride and organic matter), since the presence of a small
add a little amount of calcium oxide helps to obtain high- amount of these impurities affects the setting time and
quality gypsum for several industries such as agriculture, strength of the plaster. It is known that PG can traditionally
cement and plaster sectors. An efficacy, cheap and useful be used to slow down the hydration of tri-calcium aluminates
treatment method was proposed by Valkov et al. that claims (Ca3Al2O6), by temporarily forming a double sulfate of cal-
using ~ 0.5 M sulfuric acid [70], to extract the rare earth ele- cium and aluminum, ettringite Ca6Al2(SO4)(OH)12.26H2O.
ments (REE). The purified PG showed negligible concentra- This practice avoids the phenomenon of stiffening. In the
tions of impurities < 0.02 wt. % [71, 72]. Treating PG with plaster industry, there are two manufacturing processes: (1)
a mixture of sulfuric acid, silica or hot ammonium sulfate Route α: the plaster (called plaster α) is obtained from PG
solution is also necessary to reduce the content of P 2O5 and autoclaved in water at a temperature of 128 °C and a pres-
F in the PG samples before application [73]. A recent study sure of 2 bars. (2) Route β: the PG is heated to 190 °C at
revealed that the content of soluble phosphorus and fluorine normal pressure where it transforms into basanite (plaster
in PG can be reduced by adding lime, and flotation [74]. β). This way is used to produce plasters to be mounted [80].
Seawater seems to be most effective in eliminating the The two routes are done according to the following reaction:
traces of cadmium in PG. But, as it salinizes, it can accu-
mulate large quantities of salts in the purified PG mate- CaSO.4 2H2 O (s) → CaSO.4 0.5H2 O (s) + 1.5H2 O (g) (R4)
rial. However, under these circumstances, the prospect of
using it in plaster industries occurs with less cadmium and
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
References
the manufacture of plaster as profitable because the volcanic
[77, 87]
soil is naturally devoid of gypsum. It thus recovers 3 million
[84]
[86]
[88]
[90]
tons of PG per year [79]. However, the treatment of PG has
proven to be too expensive in most circumstances, and most
PG high acidity
[80]
[77]
[89]
[82]
[81]
[91]
[92]
Plaster manufacturing industry Slow down the hydration of tri-calcium aluminates (Ca3Al2O6),
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Raw PG Compared to the cements elaborated with natural gypsum, the compression strength is similar at [91]
short times but higher at long times
Raw PG PG can be used directly in the production of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). It improves the [92]
hydration rate as well as the mechanical resistance, especially at the 90-day hardness of the
cement
Water-washing and neutralization The removal of soluble impurities or at least reduce these impurities from PG by washing and [93]
neutralization at pH 6–7 makes the use of PG as an additive for cement grinding possible. In
the case of high-quality cement, the PG used as a setting regulator is conditioned by the pres-
ence of syncrystallized P
2O5
Treatment with ammonium Purified PG using a 10 to 20% of ammonium hydroxide solution is suitable for use in the cement [90]
hydroxide solution ( NH4OH) industry (its mechanical properties are almost similar to those of cement produced from natu-
ral gypsum)
Weathered PG The highest 28-day compressive strength was found in the sample with 3 wt.% PG [22]
Lime milk-washing The 90-day strength of the cement prepared with PG is higher than that prepared with natural [94]
gypsum
economical in the extraction process and it is evident that and Fig. 4 summarizes some other REE leaching procedures
HNO3 leaching doesn't produce PG [102]. Using a sulfuric from the recent published works.
acid solution (15%) to leach pre-treated PG, at 100 °C for As reported in many reviews, the use of organic meth-
2 h with a liquid/solid weight ratio 3:1, allowed obtaining a ods compared to the conventional hydrometallurgical acidic
final leach liquor with a total REEs content of 4309 mg L −1. leaching methods for REE recovery from PG could provide
In all cases, pre-treating the PG, by washing with saline some benefits: the largely reduction of acids consummation,
water (25 g L−1 of NaCl) and treatment with a carbonated the major reduction in the leaching solutions volumes, and
solution (60 g L−1 of Na2CO3), allowed the solubilization the possibility of achieving a much higher selectivity for
of water-soluble impurities and the production of a calcite REE recovery [100]. To purify REE elements additional
phase easily attacked in an acid medium [103]. In case of separation and purification methods such as: precipitation,
nitric and phosphoric acid mixture the REEs take the form solvent extraction, ion exchange and solid phase extraction
of REEH2PO42+, REENO32+, and REE3+. are needed. These methods are highly selective and lead to
In addition to acid leaching methods, there are a few obtain extremely high-quality materials [105].
works that used organic solvents as leaching agents. For As conclusion, the recovery of REEs from PG (consid-
example, the experimental results obtained from [104] show ered as secondary source) through hydrometallurgical pro-
that about 70% of 226Ra, 210Pb, 238U and 40 K were success- cesses is becoming a sustainable and viable approach due
fully removed from the PG by applying this method. Table 5 to the low energy consumption, low waste generation, few
Table 5 A summary of application of acidic and organic reagents in the REE leaching and recovery from PG. Modified from [105]
Leaching type Reagent Experimental conditions Recovery effi- References
ciency (%)
Reagent concentra- t T L:S ratio
tion (mol L−1) (min) (°C) (mL g−1)
TBP and TOPO are respectively tributyl phosphate and trioctylphosphine oxide
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Conversion using hydroxide mediums Ca(OH)2 (s) + CO2 (g) → CaCO3 (s) + H2 O(l) (R6)
The alkaline conversion of PG in aqueous hydroxide solu- So there are two aims for this method, the first is the use
tions under ambient pressure and temperature has been stud- of PG as a calcium source for C O2 mineral sequestration
ied by a number of researchers. The procedure consists of in the framework of the mitigation of greenhouse gasses
two essential steps (Fig. 5): emissions, approximatively 30 Mt of C O2 were utilized
in this process [23]. The second is the production of add-
• Alkaline PG dissolution, the chemical reaction of this values materials for direct application in several areas with
first step can be written as follow ( R5) with X = Na, K or good conversion efficiency and high purity. For a better
NH4: understanding of the dissolution mechanism of PG in the
hydroxide aqueous solutions, the authors have studied the
evolution of the pH and conductivity during the conversion
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
process. Then they characterized the solid phases to con- Conversion using carbonate mediums
firm the obtaining of the desired products. The reaction
mechanisms proposed can be represented in Fig. 6 [67, The results of fundamental researches were realized in some
110–113]. Looking more specifically at the dissolution fields of industry; corresponding to the conversion of the PG
of PG and the carbonation process, the initial reactions to CaCO3 and K 2SO4 or Na2SO4 by using carbonate aqueous
involve these two processes: solutions [116], this procedure has many advantages such as
the fact that it is reproducible, ecological and inexpensive.
1. the dissolution of C aSO4.2H2O to give C a2+ ions ( R7), The calcium carbonate is recovered after filtration and dry-
–
and the decrease in OH ions that will combine with ing at 100 °C, then the sulfate obtained after evaporation of
Ca2+ to precipitate as Ca(OH)2 (R8) the supernatant liquid. The chemical reactions are given in
2. The dissolution of C O2 into the water to form carbonic the following [117, 118]:
acid, which dissociates to form finally CO32– ions (R9).
CaSO.4 2H2 O(s) + K2 CO3 (aq)
(R11)
The carbonate species are then able to form via reaction → K2 SO4 (aq) + CaCO3 (s) + 2H2 O(l)
with the divalent cation ( Ca2+) resultant in the dissolution of
Ca(OH)2 (R10) [114, 115]:
CaSO.4 2H2 O(s) + Na2 CO3 (aq)
(R12)
CaSO.4 2H2 O (s) → Ca2+ (aq) + SO2−
4 (aq) + 2H2
O(l) → Na2 SO4 (aq) + CaCO3 (s) + 2H2 O(l)
(R7)
The production of ammonium sulfate has significant
2+ −
Ca (aq) + 2OH (aq) → Ca(OH)2 (R8) applications, especially in agriculture. It is used as a
source of nitrogen and sulfur for plant nutrition. Burnett,
CO2 (g) + H2 O(l) → H2 CO3 (aq) → H+ (aq) + HCO−3 (aq) from the Florida Institute Oceanography, suggests a prac-
tical solution to the PG problem [119]. The authors pro-
→ 2H+ (aq) + CO2−
3 (aq)
pose converting this waste into ammonium sulfate by the
(R9)
process called Merseburg (Ammonia-carbonation) [120,
Ca2+ (aq) + CO2−
3 (aq) → CaCO3 (s) (R10) 121]. Recently, based on this process, a study has been
conducted on the transformation of Egyptian PG into
ammonium sulfate and calcium carbonate. In this case,
the treatment of PG with sulfuric acid is very effective in
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Fig. 7 PG conversion procedure using carbonate solution Fig. 8 PG conversion procedure using chloride solution
removing the impurities associated with PG and which Conversion using fluoride mediums
contaminate the synthesized products. This procedure is
presented in Fig. 7 [56]. The Merseburg process is based CaF2 formation has its place in the global PG transforma-
on the reaction between gypsum and ammonium carbon- tions; this reaction is possible within 30 min [124]. The con-
ate as shown in the following reaction (R13) [122]: version yield is about 96%, more details are listed in Table 6
( ) and Fig. 9.
CaSO.4 2H2 O(s) + NH4 2 CO3 (aq)
( ) (R13)
→ NH4 2 SO4 (aq) + CaCO3 (s) + 2H2 O(l)
Trace and radioelements distribution
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Hydroxide solutions NaOH Na2SO4 and CaCO3 25 180 2 1.2 Constant speed [88, 125]
NaOH Na2SO4 and CaCO3 25 90 2.1 3 300 [126]
NH4OH (NH4)2SO4 and CaCO3 20 to 80 60 120b 6.7 400 [127]
NH4OH (NH4)2SO4 and CaCO3 25 90
2.1 3 300 [126]
KOH K2SO4 and CaCO3 25 180 2 to 3 0.02 600 [67]
Carbonate solutions Na2CO3 Na2SO4 and CaCO3 Ambient 180 1 – Constant speed [117]
Na2CO3 Na2SO4 and CaCO3 80 to 100 120 2
– 500 [103]
NH4CO3 (NH4)2SO4 and CaCO3 55 240 1.1 – 150 [56]
K2CO3 K2SO4 and CaCO3 Ambient 90 1 – – [118]
Li2CO3 Li2SO4.H2O and C aCO3 Ambient 90 1 – Constant speed [36]
Chloride solutions NaCl NaHSO4.H2O and C aCO3 25 –
25c – Constant speed [54]
KCl CaCl2 et K2SO4 25 45 50d – Constant speed [68]
Fluoride solutions NaF CaF2 et N
a2SO4 25 30 to 120 1.5 to 2 – 600 [124]
a
Molar ratio alkaline solution/CaSO4.2H2O
b
120 wt. % of N
H3 (c) g/L (d) 50% excess of PG
of the different radionuclides 238U, 226Ra and 210Pb in cal- It is well known that phosphate rock (PR) could be crude or
cite with an important transfer factor (> 90%). Moreover, upgraded as phosphate concentrates that are used for phos-
calcite is much more soluble than PG in acidic media, phoric acid and phosphates fertilizer manufacturing. PR
which favors the recovery of both rare earth elements production and consumption have increased significantly
(REEs) and radioelements. in different world regions, such as United States, China,
Africa, Middle East, and Eastern Europe, and they are driven
Synthesized products applications by phosphate fertilizers supply and demand, especially in
Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The largest
In all cases, these methods give high-purity sulfates, car- phosphate rock producers are Yunnan Yuntianhua Co., Ltd
bonates and fluorites. The researchers recommended apply- (China), OCP (Morocco), Mosaic (United States), and Apatit
ing these compounds directly in several domains. Table 9 OAO (Russia) whereas Africa, Eastern Europe, and the Mid-
dle East are the main phosphate rock exporters [144]. These
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Na2SO4 Detergent, paper industry, glass manufacturing, and textile industry [124, 125]
K2SO4 Agriculture [123]
(NH4)2SO4 Fertilizer industry [126]
Ca(OH)2 Mineral carbonation, formation of calcium oxide CaO nanoparticles and Remineralization of the brine water [122, 133–135]
CaCO3 Paint, plastic, paper, cement, food, textiles, rubbers, Adhesives, cosmetic industry, extraction of iron and [136–140]
pharmaceutical engineering
CaF2 Manufacture of gamma, dental care, treatment of optical Fiber and Fluor industry [124, 141, 142]
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
companies extract, treat, charge and commercialize phos- from PG residue could become economically feasible provided
phate and its derivatives, in particular phosphoric acid and that suitable extraction processes are available. Based on the
fertilizers. However, this sector is mainly associated with a high price of some REEs (Sc, Sm, La and Y) and on the grow-
large quantity of PG (around 300 MT per year). Generally, ing demand of these elements, PG by-product can represent an
the formed PG is commonly stockpiled in open areas or dis- interesting secondary source of REEs.
seminated into aquatic mediums. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a multi-step system for
Generally, PG use and valorization in different domain of asserting the lifetime environmental impact of a by-product
applications, offers some social/ ecological benefits such as: [146]. The LCA process is normally iterative as the qual-
ity and completeness of information and its plausibility is
• Employment opportunity: PG processing creates employ- constantly being tested. In all cases, using LCA is a useful
ment opportunities for people in the surrounding areas approach for comparing PG waste valorization and manage-
(Direct and indirect jobs); ment methods within the context of Circular Economy (CE).
• Intergenerational social equity; A description of LCA assessment methods that are used in
• Avoided land use: The recycling of PG is expected to the PG valorization and management field is summarized in
reduce approximately 12,000 m2 of land used for stock- Table 10 and explained in detail below.
piling of PG, according to [145]. To the best of our knowledge, few studies dealing with
environmental impact and potential applications of PG
In terms of road construction and according to the study waste, by applying the LCA methods, have been published
investigated by Bentaleb et al., it appears that using PG as a [100]. For example, in a recent study the comparison of
supplement to clay can be beneficial to both environment and alternative management methods for PG using compara-
economic benefits [146]. In comparison with the alternative tive LCA calculation was evaluated [149]. The authors used
used Toufna (Pit-run) as road construction material, the use the data base Ecoinvent 2.0 with the assessment method
of PG in this domain has a Net Present Value (NPV) positive Ecoindicator 99 to compute the ecological footprint of four
in less period (i.e. NPV: a value of all future cash flows over alternative PG waste management methods: (1) the use of
the entire life of an investment discounted to the present) and a PG in brick production, (2) as soil amendment, (3) in road
smaller Payback Period (i.e. PP: is utilized to demonstrate the construction and (4) its disposal in a stack. According to this
period required by a business/process to regain its investment). study, the top ranked method is the use of PG waste as a soil
In fact, Morocco is planning investments of around 2.8 billion amendment, with second the use of PG as a subbase in road
euro for the construction of new rural roads up to 2035. So, works and third the use of PG in brick production. Disposal
Morocco's road industry may represent a potential window for of PG waste in stacks, which is the most common manage-
PG utilization and recycling. In the some context and based ment method was ranked as the least preferred one [149].
on a recent economic case study, the PG can be utilized as Using the same LCA approach, up to 30% energy demand
embankment aggregates in a radius of 29 km keeping a lower reduction and 57% CO2 release reduction was achieved with
cost compared to conventional materials [147]. As concluded a ternary system binder based on gypsum-cement-pozzolan
by the authors, this manner of doing will lead to various advan- (GCP) binder if PG was used with practically identical per-
tages such as air emission reduction, and finite natural resources formance of mortar material [150]. This method was done
conservation and protection. Recently, Biyoune et al. analyzed by using the LCA program SimaPro 8 software, and by fol-
the cost benefit of the salinity reduction of the rejected brine lowing the ILCD handbook guidelines and International
water using PG. Based on the output-materials-global-cost esti- Organization for Standardization standards (ISO 14044).
mation, the gain ratio (output cost/ input cost) was calculated as According to these authors, natural gypsum (NG) can be
1.66 [122]. In the same context, the gain ratio of the PG conver- preserved by its replacement with PG. To produce 1t of NG
sion process (into N a2SO4 and (NH4)2SO4) was calculated as binder about 1.2 t of NG must be excavated, transferred,
3.43 when using NaOH, whereas this value decreased to 2.02 and treated. Therefore, if the production site is located near
due to the price of NH4OH [125]. Carbon dioxide sequestration to the PG stockpiles, the delivery distance is much shorter
is also an additional potential economic benefit, as 1 ton of PG and the storge of PG in stocks is avoided. For environmental
can sequester 0.26 tons of CO2 by reacting it with Ca(OH)2 safety, such a management and valorization approach seem
obtained from the PG conversion process using NaOH. Export- logical and must be supported. Comparing two alternative
ing the product of CO2 mineralization reaction, CaCO3, which solutions: (1) landfilling of this waste in large stockpiles,
is in high demand for, several industries such as construction and (2) implementation of REEs recovery technology, Kul-
and paper production, could generate further revenue [148]. czycka et al. evaluate the management of industrial PG
Preliminary studies of the techno-economic feasibility of the waste in the Wizow plant (in Pland) by taking into account
extraction of rare earth elements (REEs) from PG were evalu- both economic and environmental aspects [151]. Accord-
ated by several researchers. In general, the extraction of REEs ing to these authors, the recovery of REEs from PG waste
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Table 10 LCA approaches for different phosphogypsum’s valorization and management methods
PG’s type of valorization LCA method or software Database Results Refer-
ences
Chemical conversion into paper LCI/ Simapro Ecoinvent 3 emissionThe findings from LCA indicate that the PG [145]
based paper are not environmentally friendly
in some aspects and also not economically
profitable compared with conventional
products;
Construction Industry SimaPro Ecoinvent With the alternative PG-binder up to 30% of [150]
energy can be saved and 57 wt.% of C O2
emissions can be reduced;
SimaPro 7.3.3 CEN TC350 standards It found that transport had a marked effect [152]
on the categories of eutrophication and
noncarcinogenic effects. The greatest impact
was found when gypsum was transported to a
recycling plant at a distance of 50 km
REEs recovery Eco-indicator 99 – The REEs extraction from PG is cost-effective [151]
but requires significant financial investment,
and it is characterized by a relatively high
degree of risk;
Soil amendment Eco-indicator 99 Ecoinvent 2.0 Use of PG waste as soil amendment to correct [149]
calcium levels in agricultural land has a lower
environmental footprint than using NG;
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
waste. For this purpose, the authors support and recommend 10. Kazragis A (2010) High-temperature decontamination and uti-
pilot-studies of PG application as a soil fertilizer and as addi- lization of phosphogypsum. J Environ Engin and Land Manag
12(4):138–145. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2004.96368
tive in the building materials production (cement, bricks…). 35
Many applications of PG valorize only a few quantities of 11. Kurkinen S, Virolainen S, Sainio T (2021) Recovery of rare earth
this material. The use of PG in road construction is also of elements from phosphogypsum waste in resin-in-leach process
most interest. It represents the most promising method of by eluting with biodegradable complexing agents. Hydromet-
allurgy 201:105569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2021.
valorization and management of PG, where large amounts 105569
of PG are used. Chemical transformations of PG seem to 12. Lassad A, Hayet SF, Mongi BENO (2008) Utilisation du phos-
be preliminary studies, and may suffer from technical and phogypse dans la fabrication des briques cuites. Matériaux Sols
economic constraints (energy and reagents consummation, Struct 49–51. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publi
cation/313474101
complex development, secondary pollution …). Therefore, 13. CE (2006) Grands volumes de produits chimique inorganiques
more clarifications are needed to determine the most envi- ammoniac, acides et engrais. (Version française). Doc référence
ronmentally friendly transformation. sur les meilleures Tech Dispon
14. Gijbels K, Nguyen H, Kinnunen P et al (2019) Feasibility of
incorporating phosphogypsum in ettringite-based binder from
ladle slag. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.
Declarations 117793
15. Mattila HP, Zevenhoven R (2015) Mineral carbonation of phos-
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no competing phogypsum waste for production of useful carbonate and sulfate
interests. salts. Front Energy Res 3:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.
2015.00048
16. Choura M, Maalouf F, Keskes M, Cherif F (2012) Sulphur matrix
from phosphogypsum: a sustainable route to waste valoriza-
tion. Benef Phosphates New Thought, New Technol New Dev
References 297–302
17. Macías F, Pérez-López R, Cánovas CR et al (2017) Environmen-
1. Amaterz E, Tara A, Bouddouch A et al (2020) Photo-electro- tal assessment and management of phosphogypsum according
chemical degradation of wastewaters containing organics cata- to European and United States of America regulations. Procedia
lysed by phosphate-based materials: a review. Rev Environ Sci Earth Planet Sci 17:666–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.
Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09547-9 2016.12.178
2. Plassard, Robin, Cadre L, et al (2015) Améliorer la biodisponibil- 18. Liu D, Wang C, Mei X, Zhang C (2019) An effective treatment
ité du phosphore: comment valoriser les compétences des plantes method for phosphogypsum. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:30533–
et les mécanismes biologiques du sol ? Innov Agron 43:115–138. 30539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06113-x
Available at: https://agritrop.cirad.fr/579393/1/Plassard%20et% 19. Torres-Sánchez R, Sánchez-Rodas D, de la Campa AMS et al
20al_2015.pdf (2019) Geochemistry and source contribution of fugitive phos-
3. Smol M (2019) The importance of sustainable phosphorus man- phogypsum particles in Huelva, (SW Spain). Atmos Res. https://
agement in the circular economy (CE) model: the Polish case doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104650
study. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:227–238. https://doi.org/ 20. Binnemans K, Tom P, Blanpain B, Van GT (2015) Towards zero-
10.1007/s10163-018-0794-6 waste valorisation of rare-earth-containing industrial process
4. Castillon P (2005) Le phosphore : sources, flux et rôles pour residues : a critical review. J Clean Prod 99:17–38. https://doi.
la production végétale et l’eutrophisation. INRA Prod Anim org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.089
18:153–158. Available at: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02680756 21. Virolainen S, Repo E, Sainio T (2019) Recovering rare earth
5. Cooper J, Lombardi R, Boardman D, Carliell-Marquet C (2011) elements from phosphogypsum using a resin-in-leach process:
The future distribution and production of global phosphate rock selection of resin, leaching agent, and eluent. Hydrometallurgy
reserves. Resour Conserv Recycl 57:78–86. https://doi.org/10. 189:105125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.105125
1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.009 22. Akin Altun I, Sert Y (2004) Utilization of weathered phosph-
6. Salo M, Mäkinen J, Yang J et al (2018) Continuous biological ogypsum as set retarder in Portland cement. Cem Concr Res
sulfate reduction from phosphogypsum waste leachate. Hydro- 34:677–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.10.017
metallurgy 180:1–6. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 016/j.h ydrom
et.2 018.0 6. 23. Contreras M, Pérez-López R, Gázquez MJ et al (2014) Frac-
020 tionation and fluxes of metals and radionuclides during the
7. Koopman C, Witkamp GJ (2002) Ion exchange extraction dur- recycling process of phosphogypsum wastes applied to mineral
ing continuous recrystallization of CaSO4 in the phosphoric CO2 sequestration. Waste Manag 45:412–419. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.
acid production process: Lanthanide extraction efficiency and 1016/j.wasman.2015.06.046
CaSO4 particle shape. Hydrometallurgy 63:137–147. https:// 24. Fuleihan NF (2012) Phosphogypsum disposal - The Pros &
doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(01)00219-5 Cons of wet versus dry stacking. Procedia Eng 46:195–205.
8. Wang L, Long Z, Huang X et al (2010) Recovery of rare earths https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.465
from wet-process phosphoric acid. Hydrometallurgy 101:41– 25. Kuryatnyk T, Angulski da Luz C, Ambroise J, Pera J (2008)
47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.11.017 Valorization of phosphogypsum as hydraulic binder. J Hazard
9. Xue S, Li M, Jiang J et al (2019) Phosphogypsum stabilization Mater 160:681–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.
of bauxite residue: conversion of its alkaline characteristics. 03.014
J Environ Sci (China) 77:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes. 26. Mymrin V, Aibuldinov EK, Avanci MA et al (2021) Mate-
2018.05.016 rial cycle realization by hazardous phosphogypsum
waste, ferrous slag, and lime production waste application
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
to produce sustainable construction materials. J Mater 43. Shternina EB (1960) Solubility of gypsum in aqueous solu-
Cycles Waste Manag 23:591–603. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 007/ tions of salts. Int Geol Rev 2:605–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/
s10163-020-01147-7 00206816009473496
27. Rutherford PM, Dudas MJ, Arocena JM (1996) Heterogeneous 44. Marrouche A, Bouargane B, Mabrouk A, et al (2019) Solubility
distribution of radionuclides, barium and strontium in phosph- in the ternary system MgCl2-FeCl2-H2O at 288 K by conduct-
ogypsum by-product. Sci Total Environ 180:201–209. https:// ance method. Mediterr J Chem 8:10. https://doi.org/10.13171/
doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04939-8 mjc811902523am
28. Bchitou R, Hamad M, Lacout JL, Ferhat M (1998) Effets du 45. Aagli A, Tamer N, Atbir A et al (2005) Conversion of phospho-
cadmium sur la formation du phosphogypse lors de la produc- gypsum to potassium sulfate: Part I. The effect of temperature
tion de l’acide phosphorique. Phosphor Sulfur Silicon Relat on the solubility of calcium sulfate in concentrated aqueous
Elem 139:147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/104265098080356 chloride solutions. J Therm Anal Calorim 82:395–399. https://
84 doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-0908-y
29. Burnett WC, Elzerman AW (2001) Nuclide migration and the 46. Bounaga A, Alsanea A, Lyamlouli K et al (2022) Microbial
environmental radiochemistry of Florida phosphogypsum. J transformations by sulfur bacteria can recover value from phos-
Environ Radioact 54:27–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265- phogypsum: A global problem and a possible solution. Bio-
931X(00)00164-8 technol Adv 57:107949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.
30. Zairi M, Rouis MJ (1999) Impacts environnementaux du stock- 2022.107949
age du phosphogypse à Sfax (Tunisie). Bull des ponts chaussées 47. Biyoune MG, Bouargane B, Idboufrade A et al (2021) New
29–40 procedure for water-salinity reduction using Phosphogypsum
31. Zairi M, Rouis MJ (1999) Impacts environnementaux du stock- waste and carbon dioxide resulting in useful compounds for-
age du phosphogypse à Sfax (Tunisie). Bull des Lab des ponts mation. Nanotechnol Environ Eng 6:1–18. https://doi.org/10.
chaussées 219:29–40 1007/s41204-021-00125-0
32. Haounati R, Ouachtak H, El Haouti R et al (2021) Elabora- 48. Moreira RH, Queiroga FS, Paiva HA et al (2018) Extraction
tion and properties of a new SDS/CTAB@Montmorillonite of natural radionuclides in TENORM waste phosphogypsum.
organoclay composite as a superb adsorbent for the removal J Environ Chem Eng 6:6664–6668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
of malachite green from aqueous solutions. Sep Purif Technol jece.2018.10.019
255:117335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117335 49. Li S, Malik M, Azimi G (2022) Leaching of Rare Earth Ele-
33. Yang J, Ma L, Liu H et al (2020) Chemical behavior of fluorine ments from Phosphogypsum Using Mineral Acids. In: Lazou
and phosphorus in chemical looping gasification using phospho- A, Daehn K, Fleuriault C et al (eds) BT - REWAS 2022: Devel-
gypsum as an oxygen carrier. Chemosphere 248:1–11. https:// oping Tomorrow’s Technical Cycles. Springer International
doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125979 Publishing, Cham, pp 267–274
34. Hanna AA, Akarish AIM, Ahmed SM (1999) Phosphogypsum: 50. Papanicolaou F, Antoniou S, Pashalidis I (2009) Experimen-
part i- mineralogical, thermogravimetric, chemical and infrared tal and theoretical studies on physico-chemical parameters
characterization.pdf. J Mater Sci Technol 15:431–434 affecting the solubility of phosphogypsum. J Environ Radioact
35. S. Al-Hwaiti M, AL-Khashman OA, Al-Shaweesh M, Almohta- 100:854–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.06.012
sib AH (2019) Potentially utiliations of Jordan Phosphogypqum: 51. Baruah MK, Gogoi PC, Kotoky P (2000) Sulphate behaviour
A review. Int J Curr Res 11:3258–3262. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.2 4941/ from dissolution of gypsum in organic acids. Fuel 79:211–216.
ijcr.35160.04.2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00140-4
36. Ennaciri Y, Bettach M (2018) Procedure to convert phospho- 52. Vershkova YA, Tareeva OA, Ivlev KG, Lokshin EP (2003)
gypsum waste into valuable products. Mater Manuf Process Solubility of calcium sulfate dihydrate in nitric acid at 20°C.
33:1727–1733. https://doi.o rg/1 0.1 080/10426914.2018.1476763 Russ J Appl Chem 76:156–157. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 023/A:
37. Diop MB, Boiro A, Jauberthie R, Bouguerra A (2008) Traitement 1023380925093
à la chaux des tufs volcaniques du Sénégal oriental. Activation 53. Li Z, Demopoulos GP (2005) Solubility of C aSO4 phases in
de la réaction pouzzolanique par du phosphogypse. Déchets Sci aqueous HCl + CaCl2 solutions from 283 K to 353 K. J Chem
Tech https://doi.org/10.4267/dechets-sciences-techniques Eng Data 50:1971–1982. https://doi.org/10.1021/je050217e
38. Kuzmanović P, Todorović N, Forkapić S et al (2020) Radio- 54. Hammas I, Horchani-Naifer K, Férid M (2013) Solubility study
logical characterization of phosphogypsum produced in Serbia. and valorization of phosphogypsum salt solution. Int J Miner
Radiat Phys Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019. Process 123:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2013.05.
108463 008
39. Al-Masri MS, Amin Y, Ibrahim S, Al-Bich F (2004) Distribution 55. Yang M (2011) Solubility of phosphogypsum in pure water and
of some trace metals in Syrian phosphogypsum. Appl Geochem lime solution. Adv Mater Res 250–253:131–135. https://doi.
19:747–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2003.09.014 org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.250-253.131
40. Moncer A, Jamaa N Ben, Bagane M, et al (2016) Etude de la 56. Kandil A-HT, Cheira MF, Gado HS et al (2017) Ammonium
fabrication de ciment à partir du phosphogypse. Int J Sci Res sulfate preparation from phosphogypsum waste. J Radiat Res
Eng Technol 102–106 Appl Sci 10:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2016.11.001
41. Dvorkin L, Lushnikova N, Sonebi M (2018) Application areas 57. Alcordo IS, Rechcigl JE (1993) Phosphogypsum in agricul-
of phosphogypsum in production of mineral binders and com- ture: a review. Adv Agron 49:55–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/
posites based on them: A review of research results. MATEC S0065-2113(08)60793-2
Web Conf 149:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20171 58. Al Attar L, Al-Oudat M, Kanakri S et al (2011) Radiological
4901012 impacts of phosphogypsum. J Environ Manage 92:2151–2158.
42. Abdelrahman Magd, Saboori A (2012) Waste Materials in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.041
Construction, Utilization of. Meyers RA Encycl Sustain Sci 59. Fourati FC, Bouaziz J, Belayouni H (2000) Valorisation du
Technol Springer, New York, NY 11699–11708. https://doi. phosphogypse de Tunisie en vue de son utilisation comme
org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3 substituant au gypqe naturel dans la fabrication du ciment.
Déchets, Sci Tech 20:24–32
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
60. Shen W, Gan G, Dong R et al (2012) Utilization of solidi- bacteria, invertebrates, algae and plants. J Hazard Mater 294:80–
fied phosphogypsum as Portland cement retarder. J Mater 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.034
Cycles Waste Manag 14:228–233. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 007/ 78. Hayet Sfar Felfoul H, Clastres P, Ben Ouezdou M (2004) Etude
s10163-012-0065-x du phosphogypse de Sfax en vue d’une valorisation en technique
61. Taher MA (2007) Influence of thermally treated phosphogyp- routière. Colloq Matériaux, Sols Struct 127–131
sum on the properties of Portland slag cement. Resour Conserv 79. Davister A (1994) Belgium, Le phosphogypse déchet (plus ou
Recycl 52:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01. moins nuisible) ou ressource, PM Rutherferd et al. Sci Total Env
008 149:1–38
62. Sebbahi S, Chameikh MLO, Sahban FF et al (1997) Thermal 80. Vignes JL, Essaddam H, Daligand D (1997) Une vie de plâtre.
behaviour of Moroccan phosphogypsum. Thermochim Acta Bull l’union des physiciens 790:145–164
302:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-6031(97)00159-7 81. Bianca Calderon-Morales RS, García-Martínez A, Pineda P,
63. Mechi N, Ammar M, Loungou M, Elaloui E (2016) Thermal García-Tenorio R (2021) Valorization of phosphogypsum in
study of tunisian phosphogypsum for use in reinforced plaster. cement-based materials: Limits and potential in eco-efficient
Br J Appl Sci Technol 16:1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/ construction. J Build Eng 44:102506
2016/25728 82. Wang G, Han X, Nakayama N et al (2006) Soil organic matter
64. Romero-Hermida I, Santos A, Pérez-López R, et al (2017) New dynamics in lands continuously cultivated with maize and soy-
method for carbon dioxide mineralization based on phospho- bean in Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China: estimation from
gypsum and aluminium-rich industrial wastes resulting in valu- natural 13C abundance. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:139–144. https://
able carbonated by-products. J CO2 Util 18:15–22. https://doi. doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00026.x
org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.01.002 83. Lim SS, Park HJ, Hao X et al (2017) Nitrogen, carbon, and dry
65. Roode QI, Strydom CA (1999) The characterization of phos- matter losses during composting of livestock manure with two
phogypsum and gypsum-brushite mixtures by X-ray diffrac- bulking agents as affected by co-amendments of phosphogypsum
tion , thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetric and zeolite. Ecol Eng 102:280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
techniques. Concr Sci Eng 1:222–227. 1295-2826 ecoleng.2017.02.031
66. El Issiouy S, Atbir A, Mançour-Billah S et al (2013) Thermal 84. Abril JM, García-Tenorio R, Enamorado SM et al (2008) The
treatment of moroccan phosphogypsum. MATEC Web Conf cumulative effect of three decades of phosphogypsum amend-
EDP Sci 3:01030 ments in reclaimed marsh soils from SW Spain: 226Ra, 238U and
67. Bouargane B, Biyoune MG, Mabrouk A et al (2020) Experi- Cd contents in soils and tomato fruit. Sci Total Environ 403:80–
mental investigation of the effects of synthesis parameters on 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.013
the precipitation of calcium carbonate and portlandite from 85. Enamorado S, Abril JM, Delgado A et al (2014) Implications for
moroccan phosphogypsum and pure gypsum using carbona- food safety of the uptake by tomato of 25 trace-elements from a
tion route. Waste Biomass Valoriz. https://doi.org/10.1007/ phosphogypsum amended soil from SW Spain. J Hazard Mater
s12649-019-00923-3 266:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.019
68. Abu-Eishah SI, Bani-Kananeh AA, Allawzi MA (2000) K2SO4 86. Hassoune H, Lahhit M, Khalid A, Lachehab A (2017) Applica-
production via the double decomposition reaction of KCl and tion of leaching tests on phosphogypsum by infiltration-percola-
phosphogypsum. Chem Eng J 76:197–207. https://doi.org/10. tion. Water Sci Technol 76:1844–1851. https://doi.org/10.2166/
1016/S1385-8947(99)00158-8 wst.2017.368
69. Liu Y, Zhang Q, Chen Q et al (2019) Utilisation of water-wash- 87. Balestrini R, Lumini E, Borriello R, Bianciotto V (2015) Plant-
ing pre-treated phosphogypsum for cemented paste backfill. Soil Biota Interactions, 4th ed. Elsevier Inc
Minerals 9:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030175 88. Bouargane B, Marrouche A, El IS et al (2019) Recovery of
70. Karmakar S, Hoque Bhuiyan N (2018) Recovery of sulphur Ca(OH)2, CaCO3, and Na2SO4 from Moroccan phosphogypsum
from gypsum by reaction with sodium carbonate: production waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:1563–1571. https://doi.
of sodium sulphate. J Eng Sci 09:71–76 org/10.1007/s10163-019-00910-9
71. Valkov AV, Andreev VA, Anufrieva AV et al (2014) Phospho- 89. Bye GC (1999) Portland cement : composition, production and
gypsum technology with the extraction of valuable compo- properties. Available at: https://books.google.co.ma/
nents. Procedia Chem 11:176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 90. Rashad AM (2015) Potential use of phosphogypsum in alkali-
proche.2014.11.031 activated fly ash under the effects of elevated temperatures and
72. Abhilash SS, Meshram P, Pandey BD (2016) Metallurgical thermal shock cycles. J Clean Prod 87:717–725. https://doi.org/
processes for the recovery and recycling of lanthanum from 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.080
various resources - a review. Hydrometallurgy 160:47–59. 91. Mehta PK, Brady JR (1977) Utilization of phosphogypsum in
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.12.004 Portland cement industry. Cem Concr Res 7:537–544. https://
73. Juliastuti SR, Hendrianie N, Dian Pawitra Y, Raditya Putra I doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(77)90115-6
(2018) Reduction of P 2O5 and F from phosphogypsum by CaO 92. El-Didamony H, El ALFISA, Elwan MM (2002) Influence of
addition. MATEC Web Conf 156:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1051/ substitution of natural gypsum by phosphogypsum on the proper-
matecconf/201815603021 ties of Portland cement. Silic Ind 1:9–14
74. Wang J, Dong F, Wang Z, et al (2020) A novel method for puri- 93. Bourgier V (2008) Influence des ions monohydrogénophosphates
fication of phosphogypsum. Physicochem Probl Miner Process et fluorophosphates sur les propriétés des phosphogypses et la
56:975–983. https://doi.org/10.37190/PPMP/127854 réactivité des phosphoplâtres
75. Khaled B, Jaouadi A, Nabil F, et al (2015) Treatment and Valori- 94. Rashad AM (2017) Phosphogypsum as a construction material.
zation of Waste Gafsa pohosphate. Rev Sci des matériaux 13–31 J Clean Prod 166:732–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.
76. Nizevičienė D, Vaičiukynienė D, Kielė A, Vaičiukynas V (2019) 2017.08.049
Mechanical activation on phosphogypsum: hydrosodalite system. 95. Demol J, Ho E, Soldenhoff K, Senanayake G (2019) The sulfu-
Waste Biomass Valoriz 10:3485–3491. https://doi.org/10.1007/ ric acid bake and leach route for processing of rare earth ores
s12649-018-0339-1 and concentrates: a review. Hydrometallurgy 188:123–139.
77. Hentati O, Abrantes N, Caetano AL et al (2015) Phosphogypsum https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.05.015
as a soil fertilizer: ecotoxicity of amended soil and elutriates to
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
96. Zhang SA-T, P, (2015) REE extraction from phosphoric acid, 112. Harja M, Cretescu I, Rusu L, Ciocinta RC (2009) The influence
phosphoric acid sludge, and phosphogypsum. Miner Process of experimental factors on calcium carbonate morphology pre-
Extr Metall 124:143–150. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 179/1 7432 pared by carbonation. Rev Chim 60
85515Y.0000000002 113. Bouargane B (2018) Abstracts of National Phd Students Days
97. Bandara AMTS, Senanayake G (2019) Dissolution of calcium, 2018 (NPSD’2018), Morocco. Int Multidiscip Res J https://doi.
phosphate, fluoride and rare earth elements (REEs) from a disc org/10.25081/imrj.2018.v8.3674
of natural fluorapatite mineral (FAP) in perchloric, hydrochlo- 114. Romanov V, Soong Y, Carney C et al (2015) Mineralization of
ric, nitric, sulphuric and phosphoric acid solutions: A kinetic carbon dioxide: a literature review. ChemBioEng Rev 2:231–256.
model and comparative batch leaching of ma. Hydrometallurgy https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201500002
184:218–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.09.002 115. Ebrahimi A, Saffari M, Hong Y et al (2018) Mineral seques-
98. Lütke SF, Oliveira MLS, Silva LFO et al (2020) Nanominerals tration of C O2 using saprolite mine tailings in the presence of
assemblages and hazardous elements assessment in phospho- alkaline industrial wastes. J Clean Prod 188:686–697. https://
gypsum from an abandoned phosphate fertilizer industry. Che- doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.046
mosphere 256:127138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. 116. Vlasjan SV, Voloshin ND, Shestozub AB (2014) Producing cal-
2020.127138 cium nitrate and rare-earth element concentrates by phospho-
99. Grabas K, Pawełczyk A, Stręk W et al (2018) Study on the gypsum conversion. Chem Technol 64:58–62. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.
properties of waste apatite phosphogypsum as a raw material 5755/j01.ct.64.2.6024
of prospective applications. Waste Biomass Valoriz. https:// 117. Ennaciri Y, Bettach M, Cherrat A, Zegzouti A (2016) Conversion
doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0316-8 of phosphogypsum to sodium sulfate and calcium carbonate in
100. Cánovas CR, Macías F, Pérez-lópez R et al (2017) Valorization aqueous solution. J Mater Environ Sci 7:1925–1933
of wastes from the fertilizer industry: Current status and future 118. Ennaciri Y, Mouahid FE, Bendriss A, Bettach M (2013) Conver-
trends. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10. sion of phosphogypsum to potassium sulfate and calcium carbon-
293 ate in aqueous solution. MATEC Web Conf 5:04006
101. Brückner L, Elwert T, Schirmer T (2020) Extraction of rare 119. Burnett WC, Schultz MK, Hull CD (1996) Radionuclide flow
earth elements from phospho-gypsum: concentrate digestion, during the conversion of phosphogypsum to ammonium sulfate.
leaching, and purification. Metals (Basel). https://doi.org/10. J Environ Radioact 32:33–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-
3390/met10010131 931X(95)00078-O
102. Bartzokas A, Yarime M (1997) Technology trends in pollution- 120. Avşar C, Tümük D, Yüzbaşıoğlu AE, Gezerman AO (2022)
intensive industries: a review of sectoral trends. Discuss Pap Focusing on the Merseburg process: benefits on industrial
Ser 9706:56 decarbonization and waste minimization. Environ Technol Rev
103. Masmoudi-Soussi A, Hammas-Nasri I, Horchani-Naifer K, 11:148–155
Férid M (2019) Study of rare earths leaching after hydrother- 121. Avşar C, Gezerman AO (2022) Industrial waste management : eco-
mal conversion of phosphogypsum. Chem Africa 2:415–422. nomical benefits of the resource utilization of phosphogypsum. Int
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-019-00048-z J Ind Mark 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijim.v7i1.20325
104. El-Didamony H, Gado HS, Awwad NS et al (2013) Treatment 122. Biyoune MG, Bouargane B, Idboufrade A et al (2021) New pro-
of phosphogypsum waste produced from phosphate ore pro- cedure for water-salinity reduction using phosphogypsum waste
cessing. J Hazard Mater 244–245:596–602. https://doi.org/10. and carbon dioxide resulting in useful compounds formation.
1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.053 Nanotechnol 6:1–18
105. Costis S, Mueller KK, Blais J-F (2019) Review of recent work 123. Ennaciri Y, El A-B, Bettach M (2019) Comparative study of
on the recovery of rare earth elements from secondary sources. K2SO4 production by wet conversion from phosphogypsum and
Nat Resour Canada ISBN: 978:Report No. R1859 synthetic gypsum. J Mater Res Technol 8:2586–2596. https://d oi.
106. Walawalkar M, Nichol CK, Azimi G (2016) Process investi- org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.02.013
gation of the acid leaching of rare earth elements from phos- 124. Douahem H, Hammi H, Hamzaoui AH, Nif AM (2017) A pre-
phogypsum using HCl, HNO3, and H2SO4. Hydrometallurgy liminary study of phosphogypsum transformation into calcium
166:195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.06.008 fluoride
107. Cánovas CR, Chapron S, Arrachart G et al (2019) Leaching of 125. Cárdenas-Escudero C, Morales-Flórez V, Pérez-López R et al
rare earth elements ( REEs ) and impurities from phosphogyp- (2011) Procedure to use phosphogypsum industrial waste for
sum: a preliminary insight for further recovery of critical raw mineral CO2 sequestration. J Hazard Mater 196:431–435. https://
materials To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-02062500. J Clean doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.039
Prod 219:225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02. 126. Altiner M (2018) Effect of alkaline types on the production of
104 calcium carbonate particles from gypsum waste for fixation of
108. Liang H, Jin Z, Depaoli D (2017) Rare earths recovery and CO2 by mineral carbonation. Int J Coal Prep Util 39:1–19. https://
gypsum upgrade from Florida phosphogypsum. Miner Metall doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2018.1452739
Process 34:201–206 127. Lee MG, Ryu KW, Chae SC, Jang YN (2015) Effects of tem-
109. Hammas-Nasri I, Horchani-Naifer K, Férid M, Barca D (2016) perature on the carbonation of flue gas desulphurization gyp-
Rare earths concentration from phosphogypsum waste by two- sum using a C O2/N2 gas mixture. Environ Technol 36:106–114.
step leaching method. Int J Miner Process 149:78–83. https:// https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.938126
doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2016.02.011 128. Rosales J, Pérez SM, Cabrera M et al (2020) Treated phospho-
110. Ruiz-Agudo E, Kudłacz K, Putnis CV et al (2013) Dissolution gypsum as an alternative set regulator and mineral addition in
and carbonation of portlandite [Ca(OH)2] single crystals. Environ cement production. J Clean Prod 244:118752. https://doi.org/10.
Sci Technol 47:11342–11349. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 021/e s4020 61c 1016/j.jclepro.2019.118752
111. Fritz B, Clément A, Montes-Hernandez G, Noguer C (2013) 129. Pérez-Moreno SM, Gázquez MJ, Pérez-López R et al (2018)
Calcite formation by hydrothermal carbonation of portlandite: Assessment of natural radionuclides mobility in a phosphogyp-
complementary insights from experiment and simulation. Cryst sum disposal area. Chemosphere 211:775–783. https://doi.org/
Eng Comm 15:3392–3401 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.193
13
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
130. Pérez-Moreno SM, Gázquez MJ, Bolívar JP (2015) C O2 seques- 143. Tayibi H, Choura M, López FA et al (2009) Environmental
tration by indirect carbonation of artificial gypsum generated impact and management of phosphogypsum. J Environ Manage
in the manufacture of titanium dioxide pigments. Chem Eng J 90:2377–2386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.03.007
262:737–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.023 144. Samrane K, Bouhaouss A (2022) Cadmium in phosphorus ferti-
131. Tayibi H, Gascó C, Navarro N et al (2011) Radiochemical char- lizers: Balance and trends. Rasayan J Chem 15:2103–2117
acterization of phosphogypsum for engineering use. J Environ 145. Mohammed F, Biswas WK, Yao H, Tadé M (2018) Sustainability
Prot (Irvine, Calif) 02:168–174. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep. assessment of symbiotic processes for the reuse of phosphogyp-
2011.22019 sum. J Clean Prod 188:497–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclep
132. Gaudry A, Zeroual S, Gaie-Levrel F et al (2007) Heavy metals ro.2018.03.309
pollution of the atlantic marine environment by the Moroccan 146. Bentaleb MA (2019) Implementing circular economy strategies
phosphate industry, as observed through their bioaccumulation in morocco. Sch Sci Eng – Al Akhawayn Univ
in Ulva lactuca. Water Air Soil Pollut 178:267–285. https://doi. 147. Amrani M, Taha Y, El HY et al (2020) Sustainable reuse of
org/10.1007/s11270-006-9196-9 coal mine waste: Experimental and economic assessments for
133. Biyoune MG, Bouargane B, Bari H, et al (2020) Water quality embankments and pavement layer applications in morocco. Min-
depends on remineralization’s method in the desalination plant. erals 10:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100851
Mediterr J Chem 10:162–170. https://doi.org/10.13171/mjc10 148. Monat L, Chaudhury S, Nir O (2020) Enhancing the sustain-
202002141228mgb ability of phosphogypsum recycling by integrating electrodialysis
134. Sisomphon K, Franke L (2007) Carbonation rates of concretes with bipolar membranes. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:2490–2497.
containing high volume of pozzolanic materials. Cem Concr Res https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07038
37:1647–1653. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 016/j.c emcon res.2 007.0 8.0 14 149. Tsioka M, Voudrias EA (2020) Comparison of alternative man-
135. Khachani M, El Hamidi A, Halim M, Arsalane S (2014) Non- agement methods for phosphogypsum waste using life cycle
isothermal kinetic and thermodynamic studies of the dehydroxy- analysis. J Clean Prod 266:121386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
lation process of synthetic calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2. J Mater jclepro.2020.121386
Environ Sci 5:615–624 150. Bumanis G, Korjakins A, Bajare D (2022) Environmental benefit
136. Han YS, Hadiko G, Fuji M, Takahashi M (2006) Influence of ini- of alternative binders in construction industry: life cycle assess-
tial CaCl2 concentration on the phase and morphology of CaCO3 ment. Environments 9:6. https://doi.org/10.3390/environmen
prepared by carbonation. J Mater Sci 41:4663–4667. https://doi. ts9010006
org/10.1007/s10853-006-0037-4 151. Kulczycka J, Kowalski Z, Smol M, Wirth H (2016) Evaluation of
137. Eloneva S, Teir S, Salminen J et al (2008) Steel converter slag as the recovery of rare earth elements (REE) from phosphogypsum
a raw material for precipitation of pure calcium carbonate. Ind waste - Case study of the WIZÓW Chemical Plant (Poland). J
Eng Chem Res 47:7104–7111. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 021/i e8004 034 Clean Prod 113:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.
138. Karmal I, Mohareb S, El housse M, et al (2020) Structural and 11.039
morphological characterization of scale deposits on the reverse 152. Suárez S, Roca X, Gasso S (2016) Product-specific life cycle
osmosis membranes: Case of brackish water demineralization assessment of recycled gypsum as a replacement for natural gyp-
station in Morocco. Groundw Sustain Dev 11:100483. https:// sum in ordinary Portland cement: Application to the Spanish
doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100483 context. J Clean Prod 117:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
139. El Housse M, Abdallah H, Ilham K et al (2021) Study of the jclepro.2016.01.044
effect of inorganic inhibitor on the calcium carbonate precipita-
tion in the localized irrigation systems. Nanotechnol Environ Eng Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
2:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-021-00107-2 jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
140. Yang HJ, Yoon SW, Kim YJ et al (2020) Recovery of iron oxide
and calcium chloride from an iron-rich chloride waste using cal- Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds
cium carbonate. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. https://d oi.o rg/1 0. exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the
1007/s10163-020-01119-x author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted
141. Larsen MJ, Jensen SJ (1994) Experiments on the initiation of manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of
calcium fluoride formation with reference to the solubility of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
dental enamel and brushite. Arch Oral Biol 39:23–27. https://
doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90030-2
142. Kawano N, Nakauchi D, Fukuda K et al (2018) Comparative
study of scintillation and dosimetric properties between Tm-
doped CaF2 translucent ceramic and single crystal. Jpn J Appl
Phys 57:1–4. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.57.102401
13