Scribd
Upload
28 views18 pages

Lecture 32

Uploaded by

syed najam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
28 views18 pages

Lecture 32

Uploaded by

syed najam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Transmission Line Inductance

PRESENTER: DR.UMBRIN SULTANA


Contents
➢Line inductance based on flux considerations.
➢Inductance of single phase 2-wire line,
➢Inductance of composite conductor line, use of tables,.
➢Inductance of 3-ph line with equilateral spacing,
transposition and unsymmetrical spacing, transposition,
➢Inductance of Bundled conductors.
Bundled conductor:
➢A bundle conductor is a conductor made up of two or more sub-
conductors and is used as a single-phase conductor.
➢Extra high-voltage transmission lines invariably use bundled
conductors.
➢Sub-conductors of a bundled conductor are separated from each
other by a constant distance varying from 0.2m to 0.6m m
depending upon the designed voltage and surrounding conditions
throughout the length of the line with the help of spacers
Composite VS Bundled conductor:
Bundled conductor:
Bundled conductor:
As we know that
Advantages of Bundled conductor:
➢It reduces corona loss
➢It reduces radio interference
➢The bundled conductor lines transmit bulk power with reduced
losses, thereby giving increased transmission efficiency
➢Bundle conductor lines have a higher capacitance to neutral so
they have, which helps in improving power factor higher charging
current
➢By bundling, the GMR is increased, and the inductance per
phase is reduced. As a result, reactance per phase is reduced
Problem:
➢It

a. By Using Modified method


b. By Using Exact method
Solution:
Solution (part a):
𝐷𝑚
Here, m=n=4, L= 2 ∗ 10−7 ln
𝐷𝑠

GMD (𝐷𝑚 ) between side X and Y from Modified Method:


𝐷𝑚 = 6 m
GMR (𝐷𝑠𝑋 ) for side X:
𝐷𝑆𝑋 = 4 𝐷𝑠 ∗ 𝑑 3 *1.09
From Table A3 GMR or Ds=o.o386 ft =0.01176 m
𝐷𝑆𝑋 = 4 (0.1176)(0.3)3 *1.09
𝐷𝑆𝑋 = 0.1455 m
Similarly, 𝐷𝑆𝑌 =0.1455 m
6
𝐿𝑋 = 𝐿𝑌 = 2 ∗ 10−7 ln( ) = 7.438 ∗ 10−7 H/m
0.1455
Solution (part b):
−7 𝐷𝑚
Here m=n=4, L= 2 ∗ 10 ln
𝐷𝑠

GMD (𝐷𝑚 ) between side X and Y from Exact Method:


𝐷𝑚 = 𝑚𝑛 𝐷𝑎𝑎′ 𝐷𝑎𝑏′ 𝐷𝑎𝑐 ′ 𝐷𝑎𝑑′ 𝐷𝑏𝑎′ 𝐷𝑏𝑏′ 𝐷𝑏𝑐 ′ 𝐷𝑏𝑑′ 𝐷𝑐𝑎′ 𝐷𝑐𝑏′ 𝐷𝑐𝑐 ′ 𝐷𝑐𝑑′ 𝐷𝑑𝑎′ 𝐷𝑑𝑏′ 𝐷𝑑𝑐 ′ 𝐷𝑑𝑑′

4 2 2
= 4*4 6 ∗ 6 + 0.3 2 ∗ 62 + 0.3 2 ∗ (6.3)2 + 0.3 2 ∗ 5.7 2 ∗ (5.7)2 + 0.3 2

𝐷𝑚 = 6.000004687 m
Solution (part b):
GMR (𝐷𝑠𝑋 ) for side X:
𝐷𝑆𝑋 = 4 𝑟 ′ 𝑑 3 *1.09
𝐷𝑆𝑋 = 4 (0.1176)(0.3)3 *1.09
𝐷𝑆𝑋 = 0.1455 m
Similarly, 𝐷𝑆𝑌 =0.1455 m

−7 6.000004687
𝐿𝑋 = 𝐿𝑌 = 2 ∗ 10 ln( ) = 7.438 ∗ 10−7 H/m
0.1455
Problem: Each conductor of the bundled conductor line shown in Figure is ACSR,
1272,000-cmil pheasant. Find the inductive reactance in ohms per kilometer ( and
per mile) per phase for d=45 cm. Also, find the per-unit series reactance of the line
if its length is 160 Km and the base is 100 MVA, 345 KV.
Modified method
From Table A3 Ds=0.0466 ft,
Ds=0.0466*0.3048= 0.0142 m
For two stand bundle
𝐷𝑠𝑏 = 𝐷𝑆 = 𝐷𝑠 ∗ 𝑑 = 0.0142 ∗ 0.45 =0.0799
𝐷𝑚 = 3 𝐷𝑎𝑏 𝐷𝑏𝑐 𝐷𝑐𝑎 = 3 8 ∗ 8 ∗ 16 = 10.079 m
−7 𝐷𝑚 −7 10.079
L= 2 ∗ 10 ln = L= 2 ∗ 10 ln
𝐷𝑠 0.0799
−7 −4
𝐿 = 9.674 ∗ 10 H/m = 9.674 ∗ 10 H/km
Solution:
Solution:

Exact method
Ds=0.0466*0.3048= 0.0142 m
𝐷𝑠𝑏 = 𝐷𝑆 = 𝐷𝑠 ∗ 𝑑 = 0.0142 ∗ 0.45 =0.0799

𝐷𝑚 = mn𝑜 𝐷𝑎𝑏 𝐷𝑎𝑏′ 𝐷𝑎𝑐 𝐷𝑎𝑐 ′ 𝐷𝑎′ 𝑏 𝐷𝑎′ 𝑏′ 𝐷𝑎′ 𝑐 𝐷𝑎′𝑐 ′


𝐷𝑚 = 2*2*2 8 ∗ 8.45 ∗ 16 ∗ 16.45 ∗ 8 ∗ 7.55 ∗ 15.55 ∗ 16
Dm=11.308 m
−7 𝐷𝑚 −7 11.308
L= 2 ∗ 10 ln = L= 2 ∗ 10 ln
𝐷𝑠 0.0799
−7
𝐿 = 9.9 ∗ 10 H/m
Problem: Each conductor of the bundled conductor line shown in Figure is ACSR,
1272,000-cmil pheasant. Find the inductive reactance in ohms per kilomter( and
per mile) per phase for d=45 cm. Also, find the per-unit series reactance of the line
if its length is 160 Km and the base is 100 MVA, 345 KV.
Inductive reactance = XL=2¶fL
XL=2¶(60)(9.674 ∗ 10−4 )
XL= 0.364 Ω/km = 0.364*1.609= 0.585 Ω/mile per phase
L= 9.674 ∗ 10−4 * 1.609
10−3 𝐻
L= 1.5565 ∗
𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑒
Solution:
Per unit line reactance
2
𝑉𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 345𝐾2
Xbase= =
𝑆𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 100 𝑀

Xbase= 1190.25 Ω
𝑋𝑎𝑐𝑡 0.585
Xpu= =
𝑋𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 1190.25

Xpu= 4.914 ∗ 10−4 pu


Solution:
−7 𝐷𝑚
L= 2 ∗ 10 ln
𝐷𝑠
𝐷𝑆 = n 𝑟 ′ 𝑑 ∗ 𝑑 = 3 0.01176 ∗ 0.45 ∗ .45
𝐷𝑆 = 0.1335
𝐷𝑚 = 3 𝐷𝑎𝑏 𝐷𝑏𝑐 𝐷𝑐𝑎 = 3 9 ∗ 9 ∗ 18
𝐷𝑚 = 11.339 m
−7 11.339
L= 2 ∗ 10 ln
0.1335
𝐿 = 8.88 ∗ 10−7 H/m= 8.88 ∗ 10−4 H/km
XL=2¶fL= 2¶(60)(8.88 ∗ 10−4 )= 0.3347 Ω/km

You might also like