Depositional Structures Tectonic and Stratigraphic Units and Their Effect On The Reservoir Rock Units of South Lake Albe
Depositional Structures Tectonic and Stratigraphic Units and Their Effect On The Reservoir Rock Units of South Lake Albe
Citation: Tumushabe, M. W., Helland-Hansen, W., Nagudi, B., Echegu, S., Aanyu, K. (2024). Depositional Structures, Tectonic and
Stratigraphic Units and Their Effect on The Reservoir Rock Units of South Lake Albert Basin, albertine rift, uganda. J Res Edu, 2(1),
01-16.
Abstract
The study focused on interpretation of three-dimension (3D) seismic and suites of wireline log datasets, to construct and
interpret models and facies analysis to assess the depositional structures, tectonic and stratigraphic unit’ settings. Challenges
and uncertainties of low to moderate reservoir quality parameters attributed to limited understanding of depositional structures,
tectonic and stratigraphic units had been identified in previous studies within the study area. From the study undertaken, the
study area is structurally complex with compartments and flower structures. The stratigraphic interpretation, realized that
sediments were highly intercalated (clay, silt, fine and coarse sands) majorly attributed to the short changes in climatic (wet
and dry) conditions. It was further deduced that compartmentalization and intercalations of sediments had a very high effect
on the reservoir rock properties which might affect the recovery of the available fluids.
Keywords: SouthLake AlbertBasin, Reservoir Rock Units, Flower Structures, Compartmentalization and Intercalation.
Figure 1: Map showing the Extent of South Lake Albert basin (modified from Abeinomugisha and Njabire, 2012).
Figure 1: Map showing the Extent of South Lake Albert basin (modified from Abeinomugisha
According to Wilson et al., (1977) and Martinius et al., (2014), correlation of stratigraphic packages. Hence, undertaking studies
investigating theandtectonic
Njabire,and
2012).
depositional factors guide the on the depositional structures or tectonic and stratigraphic units
understanding of the control and effect on the reservoir quality. Thus, and facies analysis will guide the understanding of reservoir
the different studies conducted in SLAB highlighted challenges quality. In conclusion, the causes of the highlighted challenges and
and uncertainties of low to moderate porosity, permeability and uncertainties of low to moderate porosity,3 | P apermeability
ge and high
high volume of shale i.e., poor reservoir rock parameters that were volume of shale would be better understood. Thus, this study was
attributed to limited understanding of depositional structures, aimed at understanding the depositional structures, tectonic and
tectonic and stratigraphic units, and its effect on the reservoir stratigraphic units, and their effect on the reservoir quality.
quality. These challenges may affect the recovery of petroleum
resource volumes within a given field. According to Galloway, 1.2 Geological Setting
(1989), successful interpretation and delineation of depositional 1.2.1 Structure and Evolution of The Albertine Graben
systems, and basin-scale facies require the recognition and The East African Rift System (EARS) represents the world’s
SN Age Formation
1 G7 – 0.5 Ma Absent in Kaiso-Tonya
2 G6 – 1.8 Ma Absent in Kaiso-Tonya
3 GX – 2.3 Ma Kaiso Village
4 GX - 2.6 Ma Hohwa
5 G5 – 3 Ma Kyehoro
6 G4c – 3.4 Ma Upper Warwire (above Kyampanga Tuff)
7 G4b – 3.7 Ma Middle Warwire (Sebugoro)
8 G4a - 4.5 Ma Lower Warwire
9 ---------------- Extinction event
10 G3b – 4.9 Ma Uppermost Nkondo (Nyaweiga Member)
11 G3a – 6.5 Ma Upper Nkondo shaley member
12 G2b – 7 Ma Not exposed
8 G2a – 8 Ma Not exposed
9 G1 – 12-9 Ma Not exposed
10 G0 – 13 Ma Not exposed
Table 1: Kaiso exposures display only 10 of the complete succession of molluscan associations known in the Albertine Rift, for
reasons to be discussed herein (Gautier 1970; Pickford et al., 1993; Senut & Pickford., 1994; Van Damme & Pickford., 1995,
1999, 2003, 2010).
2. Material and Methods i.e., Base Nkondo, Base Mputa and Base Nyaweiga, the identified
Available data used for this project was acquired from Ugandan reservoir rock units (Fig. 3).
exploration areas 2 and 3A in the SLAB that covers the Kaiso-
Tonya and Kingfisher area situated under the Coordinate Faults were interpreted on the two 3D seismic volumes. Fault
Reference System (CRS); WGS 84 UTM84 – zone 36 North (Fig. interpretation was enhanced using structural seismic volume
2). Datasets included; 350 and 230sq.km of 3D seismic data from attributes such as structural smoothing, anti-tracking and variance
Kingfisher and Kaiso-Tonya areas respectively, and suites of wire (edge detection). During horizon mapping, to define the area of
logs. Two softwares were used during this study, that is Petrel interest, a boundary polygon was generated by digitizing on the
and Techlog. According to Ali et al., (2021), the integrated study survey map and all data within this boundary was modelled and
using multidisciplinary datasets (3D seismic and wireline logs) mapped. The interpreted horizon interpretations and faults were
to understand the structural, stratigraphic, depositional and facies used as input in generating structural maps defined by the boundary
characteristics can be used to investigate the complex geometry of polygon. The generation of these structural maps involved the use
any basin. That is why these datasets were identified to be used in of convergent interpolation algorithm using seismic lines with
this study. high density.
Within the two (Kaiso-Tonya and Kingfisher) surveys, wells A velocity model was created using surfaces as inputs and this
with density, sonic velocity and Vertical Seismic Profile (VSP) velocity model was used for depth conversion. The surfaces were
data were used to run seismic-well tie thus creating a well time used to define the value at each xy location and covered the whole
depth relationship (TDR) between the seismic volumes and the area of the velocity zone. The velocity model used was; v =vo+
corresponding wells. During seismic well-tie process, density kZ, v = vo = vint (assuming k=0), Where v -calculated velocity at
and sonic logs were multiplied to get acoustic impedance as per xy location in zone, vo = Velocity at datum (SRD), vint = Interval
the equation below; z=ρv, z-Acoustic Impendence, ρ -density. v= Velocity (all these were generated using seismic well-tie process).
√(E/ρ), v-Sound wave velocity, E=Elastic modulus, ρ -density. The z-Acoustic Impendence and k- Instantaneous velocity gradient.
obtained acoustic impedance across two formations of different
densities and sonic velocity were convolved with a selected wavelet Horizon and fault interpretations were depth converted using
in petrel thus generating a synthetic seismogram. The generated the calibrated seismic velocity cube modelling method and then
seismograms for Mputa 5 and Kingfisher 1A wells were used in used in structural modeling. To build a structural model, a fault
picking formations on the two 3D seismic volumes (Kaiso-Tonya framework was first generated under structural frame work
and Kingfisher areas respectively). Correlation of different wells modeling method. The depth converted horizon and fault frame
was also conducted to identify formations. It was conducted on work were then modelled using Volume Based Modelling (VBM)
the Kaiso Tonya wells using, Nzizi-1, Nzizi-2, Mputa-1, Mputa-2, method thus creating zoned model.
Mputa-4 and Mputa-5 wells to identifying the different formations
9|Page
FigureFigure
3: Well Correlation
3: Well for Kaiso
Correlation Tonya
for Kaiso wells
Tonya wellsusing,
using,Nzizi-2,
Nzizi-2, Nzizi-1, Mputa-3,Mputa-4,
Nzizi-1, Mputa-3, Mputa-4, Mputa-1,
Mputa-1, Mputa-2
Mputa-2 wells,
wells, identifying
identifying the the
different
different formations,
formations, withwith
BaseBase Nkondo
Nkondo at 1320m,Base
at 1320m, BaseMputa
Mputa at
at 1200m
1200m and
andBase
BaseNyaweiga
Nyaweigaat 885m all were
at 885m picked
all were usingusing
picked measured
measured
depth (mD). Base Nkondo, Base Mputa and Base Nyaweiga zones were observed to have majorly sand and taken as potential reservoir
depth (mD).
rock. Base Nkondo, Base Mputa and Base Nyaweiga zones were observed to have majorly sand and taken as potential reservoir
rock.
Figure 4: RawFigure
seismic dataseismic
4: Raw for basin
databounding fault in Kaiso
for basin bounding fault in Tonya area. area.
Kaiso Tonya
Figure
Figure 6: Formations 6: Formations
mapped mapped
from Seismic from Root
data using Seismic
Meandata using(RMS)
Square Root Mean Square
Amplitude (RMS)in Amplitude
attribute Kingfisher area, showing Base
Kisegi (yellow), Base Kasande (light green), Base Kakara (blue) and Base Oluka (purple).
attribute in Kingfisher area, showing Base Kisegi (yellow), Base Kasande (light green), Base
KakaraFormation,
In the Base Nyaweiga (blue) and Base
it wasOluka (purple).
observed that Mputa Formation, Mputa field was composed of silt, pockets of fine
field was composed of fine sands with pockets of silt, Nzizi field sands and coarse sands, Nzizi field had silt and pockets of coarse
had fine sands with silts, Waraga field was composed of majorly sands, Waraga field was composed of coarse sands, Ngassa field
In the Base Nyaweiga Formation, it was observed that Mputa field was composed of fine sands
fine sands, Ngassa field had coarse sands, silt and clay, and the had fine and coarse sands, and the section under Lake Albert was
with
section under Lake pockets
Albert hadofcoarse
silt, Nzizi field
sands, silthad
andfine
finesands
sandswithcomposed
silts, Waraga fieldsands
of fine was with
composed of of
pockets majorly
silt, coarse sand and clay
(Fig. 7).Base Mputa Formation was also present in the Mputa-2, (Fig. 7).From Base Nkondo Formation,
fine sands, Ngassa field had coarse sands, silt and clay, and the section under Lake Albert had 13 Mputa field
| Pwas
a gcomposed
e
3, 4 and 5, Waraga-1 and Nzizi-1 and 2 wells. In the Base Mputa of fine sands and silts, Nzizi field was composed of fine sands
coarse sands, silt and fine sands (Fig. 7).Base Mputa Formation was also present in the Mputa-2,
J Res Edu, 2024 3, 4 and 5, Waraga-1 and Nzizi-1 and 2 wells. In the Base Mputa Formation, Mputa fieldVolume
was 2 | Issue 1 | 7
composed of silt, pockets of fine sands and coarse sands, Nzizi field had silt and pockets of
coarse sands, Waraga field was composed of coarse sands, Ngassa field had fine and coarse
sands, and the section under Lake Albert was composed of fine sands with pockets of silt, coarse
and pockets of silt.Waraga field was composed of fine and coarse the short changes in climatic conditions that happened over time
sands.Ngassa field was composed of fine sands and pockets of clay during the sediment deposition processes.
and the section under Lake Albert had fine sands with pockets of
coarse sands, silt and clay (Fig. 7). Base Kakara Formation was composed of silts towards the basin
boundary fault, fine sands and coarse sands towards the Lake
From the cross section through Ngassa field and section under Albert (Fig. 9). Base Oluka Formation had fine sands, pockets of
Lake Albert i.e., section parallel to the basin bounding fault, it coarse sands and silt. Base Kasande Formation had coarse sands
could be interpreted that sediment deposition in Kaiso-Tonya area towards the basin boundary fault, clay towards the bottom of Lake
was highly intercalated (interbeds of different facies i.e., there Albert, pockets of fine sands in the south and east direction (Fig.
were thin lithofacies with different interbedded lithologies (clay, 10). It should also be noted that Base Kisegi Formation could not
silt, fine and coarse sands) deposited at very shorter intervals (Fig. be modeled due to the poor distribution of facies in wireline logs
8). It was also interpreted that the deposition was influenced by of the existing wells in the study area.
Figure
Figure 7: Facies
7: Facies maps formaps for Base Nyaweiga,
Base Nyaweiga, Base Mputa Base Mputa
and Base andformations
Nkondo Base Nkondo formations
of Kaiso Tonya area.of Kaiso Tonya area.
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
Figure 9: Facies map for Base Kakara and Oluka formations of Kingfisher area indicated the facies distributions within the model as
Figure 9: Facies map for Base Kakara and Oluka formations of Kingfisher area indicated the facies distributions within the model as
coarse sand (yellow), fine sand (brown), silt (pink) and clay (grey).
coarse sand (yellow), fine sand (brown), silt (pink) and clay (grey).
J Res Edu, 2024 Volume 2 | Issue 1 | 9
Figure 10: Facies map for Base Kasande formation of Kingfisher area indicated facies distributions within the model as coarse sand
(yellow), fineFigure 10: Facies
sand (brown), map
silt (pink) andfor
clayBase
(grey).Kasande formation of Kingfisher area indicated facies
distributions within the model as coarse sand (yellow), fine sand (brown), silt (pink) and clay
3.3 Structural Analysis and Mapping Nyaweiga as yellow and Warwire as light green (Fig.5).
(grey).
A cross section through the model of Kaiso Tonya area was
made through Mputa-5, Mputa-1, Mputa-2 and Ngassa-2 wells 3.4 Depositional Setting Analysis
northwards using an imaginary line from NW-SE direction (Fig. Using Root mean square (RMS) amplitude attribute, within the
11). From this cross section, it was observed that, Kaiso Tonya Mputa Formation, a distinctive channel (distributary fluvial
area had different compartments separated by different normal deposits) was mapped around the Mputa and Nzizi fields, alluvial
faults and was highly compartmentalized. It was also realized that deposits were mapped around the Waraga field and deltaic and
different wells were drilled within different compartments and lacustrine deposits were identified 19around
| P a gthe
e Ngassa field and
Kaiso Tonya area had a major fault that makes a terrace around the section under Lake Albert (Figs. 13 and 14). Using variance
Ngassa field (Fig.5) with faults within the basin that were identified attribute, within Kisegi Formation, a channel (fluvial deposits) was
as flower structure (Fig.12).Formations were also mapped from mapped on 3D seismic dataset in the Kingfisher area originating
Seismic data using Root Mean Square (RMS) amplitude attribute from the basin boundary fault, towards the Lake Albert and
in Kaiso Tonya area showing Nkondo as purple, Mputa as Red, distinctive deltaic deposits were interpreted at a point where
Figure 11:Figure
Cross 11:
section through
Cross formations
section using an imaginary
through formations using anline in the NW-SE
imaginary line in direction
the NW-SE for Kaiso Tonya
direction for area.
Kaiso Tonya area.
21 | P a g e
Figure 12:
Figure 12: Seismic
Seismic section
section showing
showingpositive
positiveflower
flowerstructure-like faults
structure-like persisting
faults up toupthe
persisting to top
the oftoptheofsection, indicating
the section, a recenta recent
indicating
compressional
compressional episode in
in Kaiso
KaisoTonya
Tonyaarea.
area.
Figure 14:Figure
Depositional settingsetting
14: Depositional analysis in Mputa
analysis formation
in Mputa formationtop
top using RootMean
using Root Mean Square
Square (RMS)(RMS) Amplitude
Amplitude attributeattribute
in Kaiso in Kaiso Tonya
Tonya
area within the Ngassa field and section under the Lake Albert. Deltaic deposits are identified near the fault that makes a terrace as it
area within the Ngassa field and section under the Lake Albert. Deltaic deposits are identified near the fault that makes a terrace as it
gets in contact with Lake Albert water.
gets in contact with Lake Albert water.
4. Discussion originating from the basin boundary fault and deltaic deposits are identified at section where
moderate to poor sorting and deltaic deposits are thick, expanded
From the previousbasinstudies, SLABget
sediments encountered low toLake
in contact with moderate sections of predominantly clastic sedimentary facies [21]. This
Albert water.
porosity, permeability and high volume of shale i.e., poor reservoir study also discovered that sediments in the sections close to the
parameters that were attributed to limited understanding of basin boundary fault are mainly composed of fluvial and alluvial
depositional structures, tectonic and stratigraphic units, [12,13,15]. deposits, and the sediments close to the lake margins are comprised
4. Discussion
This study realized that the different wells were drilled within of deltaic and lacustrine deposits.
From theand
different compartments, previous studies,
Kaiso Tonya area SLAB
has a encountered
major fault low to moderate porosity, permeability and high
that makes a terrace
volume towards the i.e.,
of shale lake poor
and the area gets
reservoir deeper that
parameters Thiswere
studyattributed
further deduced that tectonically,
to limited understanding SLABof is structurally
towards the lake. It was also deduced that the study area was complex with normal faults that make compartments and flower
depositional
comprised of alluvial, structures,and
fluvial, lacustrine, tectonic
deltaicand stratigraphic
deposits, units, [12,13,15].
and structure. This study
These structural realized
features might that
havethe
a serious effect
all make the reservoir rock units.
different wells were drilled within different compartments, and Kaiso Tonya area has a major the different
on the connectivity and fluid saturation within
compartments thus affecting the fluid flow from one compartment
According to Nurfault that
et al., makesdeltas
(2017), a terrace towards
are major sitesthe lake and
of sand and the
to area getsIfdeeper
another. this istowards
the case,the lake.
this willIthave
was aalso
big effect on the
mud deposition and contain significant volumes of hydrocarbons recovery of the petroleum resource
deduced that the study area was comprised of alluvial, fluvial, lacustrine, and deltaic deposits, volumes from fields within the
worldwide, and these include; the Niger Delta in West Africa, the study area. According to Moore and Wade, (2013), in the petroleum
Mahakam Delta and all makethetheCaspian
in Borneo, reservoirSea,rock
andunits.
the Maracaibo industry, it has been hard to identify and predict the effect of
Basin in Venezuela. Fluvial deposits are sediments that are reservoir compartmentalization on fluid flow through a field and
transported and deposited by rivers in a continental environment currently, forensic level of reservoir analysis coupled with use of
and are major reservoir units in sedimentary basins. Furthermore, dynamic signals from production is being 25 |used
P a gtoe understand the
the contribution of lacustrine environment as the hydrocarbon fluid flow from one compartment to another. However, this may
reservoir has been widely known. Alluvial deposits consist be very difficult to undertake in this study since no petroleum
of silt, sand, clay, and gravel, as well as much organic matter, production has been undertaken in the study area. Thus, another
fluvial deposits consist of sand and gravel grain size and mud study can be undertaken when petroleum production commences
in floodplain deposits of meandering systems, and they have that is anticipated in the near future.