LA HoangThiThuHuong Sum
LA HoangThiThuHuong Sum
Phase 2: Quantitative research for collecting and analyzing data, Chapter 1: LITERATURE REVIEW ON FACTORS AFECTING
validating research model by such methods as exploratory factor analysis (EFA), DESTINATION CHOICE
Cronbach Alpha, SEM. 1.1. Concepts
6. Contribution of the research 1.2. Models of consumers’ behavior in tourism and destination choice
First, the research helps constructing theoretical model that describes the Consumers’ behaviosr in tourism are behaviors that are related to the
relationships between factors affecting tourists’ attitute, commitment to consumption of tourism services, that are manifested in searching, buying, using and
destination choice and loyalty to destination. Especially, the research explains evaluating tourism services in order to satisfy certain needs of tourists. Trần Minh
the behavioral rules between choosing a cultural destination and a marine Đạo (2012) argued that consumers’ behaviors are all the behaviors that are
destionation. Decisions on destinations are also addressed in regards to potential performed by consumers in the consumption process. Consumers’ behaviors are
tourists (who have never visited the destination but are commited to visit in the a complex process since they are rooted in internal psychological factors. In
future) and tourists that have visited the destination (who intend to return and tourism context, this process is made more and more complex due to the
recommend to others about the destination). The results of the research will intrinsic characteristics of tourism services, i.e. intangibility, inseparation, v.v.
enrich the theories related to consumers’ behavior in tourism in general and (Correia et al, 2007). Investigating consumers’ behavior refers to investigating
destination choice behavior in particular. how they make decisions on using existing resources, i.e. money, time, v.v. and
Second, the thesis combines two rather new research models in consuming products and services for satisfying individual needs (Kotler, 2000).
consumers’ behavior and consumers’ behavior in tourism, i.e. Structural A tourist’s decision-making process is a complex sequence of such decisions as
equation model and behavior process model. Applying these research models which destination to choose, which attractions to visit, when to travel, with
help evaluate the validity of relationships between inputs (stimulus variables) and whom, for how long, how much money to spend (Woodside and Lysonski,
outputs (response stimulus). In addition, the model also explains about the 1989; Woodside and MacDonald, 1994; Hyde, 2008; Oppewal và cộng sự,
mechanism or psychological sequence in decision-making behavioral sciences 2015). Of all these issues, destinatin choice is one of the most important
through investigating the decision-making process of individual, with the decisions through the journey and is often studied with regards to geographical
emphasis on the cognitive phase before the tourist makes the final decision. locations. (Kim et al, 2012; Byon and Zhang, 2010). In studying destination
Third, this study makes a contribution to statistics methods by choice, we need to answer three questions as follows: (1) why tourists choose
simultaneously utilizing two qualitative methods (in-dept interview of tourists and that destination? (2) what do they do in that destination? (3) how they get to the
experts and focus group interview) and quantitative methods (EFA, CFA and destination?
SEM). The theoretical model of this research logically explains about tourists’ Theories on planning behavior are often used in theoretical research
psychological sequence in the destination choice process that starts with models for predicting tourists’ behavior as well as their destination choice
influences by information sources. This model succeeds in indicating the different intention (Jalilvand et al, 2012; Prayag, 2008). The central model of behavioral
phases in tourists’ psychological sequence. This application of research models theory indicates that human behaviors will produce certain responses based on
are an encourgagement and basis for other interested scholars. certain stimuli of reference factors and resources. This means that behavior is a
Fourth, the results of this research will provide destination managers with reaction by individuals when they are stimulated by one or more than one factors
accurate information and insights on tourists’ attitude and behavior, thereby helps in the environment. The external and internal factors converge into one situation
devising effective strategies and policies to attract and motivate tourists to and a directed behaving sequence so that the individual could adjust to that
domestic destinations, based on exploiting specific strengths of destinations. situation (Lam and Hsu, 2005; Ajzen, 1991). In this thesis, tourists’ commitment
7. Structure of the study to destination is indicated by there willingness, to varying degree, to the
Besides the introduction and conclusion chapters, this thesis consists of destination in the future; their loyalty to the destination as indicated by their
four chapters: intention to revisit the destionation and recommend it to others.
Chapter 1: Literature review on factors affecting destination choice 1.3. The factors affecting destination choice
Chapter 2: Research methodology The literature review shows that the factors affecting destination choice
Chapter 3: Research findings decisions are diverse and complex. Most of the studies mention the internal
Chapter 4: Discussions, recommendations and suggestions factors (individual ones) and external factors (environmental ones). Several
authors have relied on Crompton’s approach (1979) that divided factors into
push motives and pull motives. Nevertheless, each study only addressed a group
of factors or certain factors, depending on research purpose and context.
5 6
This thesis examines the factors affecting destination choice based on the process in tourists’ decision-making process, but rather tend to apply regression
overall model of travel motivation by Crompton (1979), model of factors analysis. Third, there is no comparative analysis of different destinations with
affecting destination choice by Woodside and Lysonski (1989), Um and regards to different type of tourism products.
Crompton (1991, 1992) and Hill (2000). Thereby, the factors are grouped into This thesis embraces the research model of travel motivation by
external factors( information sources, culture, family, lifestyle and destination Crompton (1979), model of factors affecting destination choice by Woodside
characteristics) and tourists’ individual factors (motives, character, travel and Lysonski (1989), Um and Crompton (1991, 1992) and Hill (2000). Based on
experience). This research addresses both tourists that have never been to the the research gap and suggesstions from experts, this thesis selected the factors of
destination and those that have. It also analyzes tourists’ motives for travel: (i) demographics, travel motives, and information sources on the destination and
push motives are innter motives or tourists’ individual characteristics; (ii) pull idntified two destination, i.e. Hue and Da Nang for tourist survey.
motives or destination characteristics perceived by tourists. Besides, such factors 1.4.4. Proposed research model
as information sources tourists’ attitude towards the destination are also Based on the theoretical background mentioned above, I propose the
investigated in relation to other factors in the decision-making process as well as overall research model as in Figure 1.9. The models target the tourists who have
tourists’ loyalty. never been to the destination (Figure 1.11) as well as those who have never been
1.3.1. Motivation for travel to the destination (Figure 1.12). The factors and items will be analyzed and
Choice of destination is influenced by several factors (Tezak và cộng sự, edited (if necessary).
2013), especially the motives for travel. These motives are rooted in individual
idiosyncrasies and destination characteristics (Tezak et al, 2010). This thesis
embraces push-pull motives model developed by Crompton (1979) and explained
by Hsu et al (2009) as follows: pull motives consist of four factors
(psychological factors such as residence detachment, self-esteem, v.v.; physical
factors such as resting and leisure, healthcare, v.v; social factors such as visiting
family, making friends, v.v.); push motives consist of two factors (tangible
factors of the destination such as infrastructure and facilities, price, services,
v.v.; and ingangible factors such as destination brand and tourists’ expections on
other benefits).
1.3.2. Information source on the destination
Information on destination is of great importance to tourists and
destination managers as well as the overall tourism industry (Nicoletta and
Servidio, 2012). Searching for information is considered one of the main factors
that determine destination choice (Jacobsen and Munar, 2012). Sources of
information may be internal or external; or informal information from relatives
and friends or formal information from brochures and tourism associations
(Molina and Esteban, 2006). This thesis groups information sources that tourists
draw upon into (i) formal source (from national and local administration of
tourism, from tourism companies – in digital or non-digital forms), (ii) word-of-
mouth source (direct word-of-mouth information and indirect word-of-mouth
information from families and friends); and (iii) information from tourists’
individual experience.
1.4. Theoretical research model and hypotheses
After reviewing the literature, I have identified the theoretical gap on
destination choice behavior. First, there exist few studies that comprehensively
address the factors affecting destination choice, but rather emphasize some
certain separate factors; Second, few authors utilize the SEM to investigate the
multi-directional relationships between factors as well as the psychological
7
Information sources Jacobsen and Munar (2012), Hyde (2008), Um and Ajzen (1991),
on the destination Crompton (1992) Attitude Jalilvand and Destination choice
(formal, word-of- towards the Samiei (2012), (commitment/evoke
mouth, personal destination Decrop (2006), to choice, loyalty)
Um and
experience)
Crompton
(1990), Lee
(2007)
Jacobsen and Munar (2012), Inner motivation Hill (2000)
Mutinda and Mayaka (2012), (exploratory motives,
Kiralova and Pavliceka (2015) leisure, social Dalen (1989), Gonza´lez and Bello (2002), Hsieh và
interaction, physical, cộng sự (1993), Muller (1991), Pitts and Woodside
v.v) (1980), Shih (1986), Gartner (1993), Kim and Lee
(2002), Moutinho (1987) Sirakaya và cộng sự (1996)
experience
destination
Information
HB1.4
sources on the
HA1.4
Personal travel
(formal, word-of-
HB1.3
HB1.1
HA1.3
HA1.1
HB1.2
HA1.2
v.v.
destination
(exploratory
physical, v.v)
(exploratory
superstructure,
services, price,
destination
physical, v.v)
motives, leisure,
social interaction,
Inner motivation
infrastructure and
(resource, tourism
Perception of the
motives, leisure,
social interaction,
Inner motivation
infrastructure and
(resource, tourism
Perception of the
8
8
superstructure, HB2.1
HA2.1
HB3.1
HA3.1
the
Attitude
towards
Attitude
destination
towards the
destination
HB2.2
HA2.2
HB3.2
HA3.2
HB4
HA4
Figure 1.12. Model 2: For tourists who have been to the destination
loyalty)
to choice,
destination
Destination
Loyalty to the
Figure 1.11. Model 1: For tourists who have never been to the destination
choice (evoke
9 10
9 10
11 12
results for other regions in Vietnam; (2) Hanoi residents have structural 3.2.2. Exploratory measurement results - EFA
diversity in age, occupation, educational level, income, expecially the level and 3.2.2.1. Exploratory measurement results of Hue destination
average income of the people is quite high, so they have a lot of experience Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to determine how many latent
traveling; (3) the native country of people in Hanoi are quite different that variables underlie the complete set of items. An EFA was used to reduce the
cause of diverse personality, culture, subculture, behavior, lifestyle and forty two items to a smaller, more manageable set of underlying factors. This is
demonstrate the specificity and regional characteristics in choosing tourism helpful for detecting the presence of meaningful patterns among the original
destinations; (4) high population density, geographical distance is not far away variables and for extracting the main service factors.
and easy to access and interview as well. The resulting exploratory solution with an orthogonal rotation indicates a
Secondly, depend on the persoectives of people are living in Hanoi; the nine-factor solution for Hue destination. Depend on the meaning of items in
authors choose Hue and Da Nang as two target destinations by the following each group, the loadings for the factors, after the elimination of the items as
specific reasons: (1) the consideration of factors must put in the context of a stated above, theses factor were renamed. Compared to a defined group of
particular destination; (2) the distance and cost of travel as well as the elements based on theoretical overview, survey data point selection acts to Hue
convenience in moving from Hanoi to Hue and Da Nang not much difference; and the influencing factors indicate that there is a change to factors inner
(3) Hue and Da Nang are two destination featuring two types of cultural tourism motivation, perception of the destination, personal travel of experence (see
and sea tourism - these are 2 types of tourism typical of tourism in Vietnam. Table 3.9).
CHAPTER 3: DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS Table 3.9. Exploratory measurement results of Hue destination
3.1. Descriptive Statistics Construct Cronba
3.1.1. Characteristics of Sample Items New name ch’s
Overall respondents of study is that people in the 12 urban districts of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Alpha
Hanoi city. Studies based on samples collected at stratifed sampling and HDD1 .862 Natural .923
convenience sampling method; included in the analysis of the samples are 938 HDD2 .855 resources
respondents. HDD16 .855
3.2. Quanlitative research and measurement model HDD7 .849
3.2.1. Basic Statistics of Study’s variables
HDD6 .835
- Internal Motives/ Push motives (DC)
Internal or Push motives are applied in formal quantitative study included HDD17 .764
16 items denoted HDC (Hue destination) and DNDC (Da Nang destination). HDD5 .747
The inspection of the item-to-total correlation of the 16 items measuring showed HDC8 .778 Exploratory .883
that all items were satisfied and the Cronbach’s alpha was reasonable at α=0.831 HDC12 .777 motives
(Hue) and α=0.838 (Danang). According to a cutoff 0.5 for corrected item-total HDC7 .777
correlations, the items above will be deleted including HDC2, HDC3, HDC6, HDC13 .772
HDC11, DNDC1. HDC9 .749
- Destination perception/Pull Motives (DD) HDC10 .738
External factors or pull motives or attribute of destination was applied in HDC15 .699
quantitative study included 18 items/variables called as HDD (Hue destination) HDC16 .582
for DNDD (Da Nang destination). The results of Cronbach's Alpha showed the
HTTCT4 .857 Formal .904
correlation between the variables in each group is quite high (0.775 to 0.858 for
HTTCT3 .854 information
Hue and Danang destination). Specifically the items eliminated including
HTTCT5 .849 sources
HDD11, HDD18, DNDD15.
- Destination information resouces (TT) HTTCT6 .837
The construct of destination information resouces was applied include HTTCT2 .799
formal information sources (CT), word of mouth - informal (TM) and travel HTTCT1 .722
experience to the destination (KN). The Cronbach's Alpha was reasonable at HDD13 .926 Infrastructure .932
α=0.904, 0.883, 0.887 (Hue) and α=0.908, 0.880, 0.895 (Danang).
11 12
13 14
Items Construct New name Cronba Table 3.11. Exploratory measurement results of Danang destination
HDD14 .915 and ch’s Construct Cronbac
HDD12 .903 superstructure Items New name h’s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
HDD4 .870 in destination Alpha
HDD3 .803 DNTTCT6 .867 Formal .908
DNTTCT3 .849 information
HTTTM5 .874 Destination .883
word-of- DNTTCT2 .843 sources
HTTTM6 .793
mouth souces DNTTCT5 .837
HTTTM4 .788
DNTTCT4 .794
HTTTM1 .782
DNTTCT1 .622
HTTTM2 .732 DNKN5 .872 Personal .895
HTTTM3 .678 DNKN3 .862 experience
HKN6 .874 Personal .899 DNKN2 .850 to
HKN4 .868 experience to DNKN6 .794 destination
HKN3 .808 destination DNKN4 .709
HKN2 .793 DNKN1 .684
HKN5 .779 DNDD2 .779 Natural .845
HDD10 .764 Services in .820 DNDD1 .749 resources
HDD8 .760 destination DNDD16 .735
HDD18 .749 DNDD6 .730
HDD9 .743 DNDD7 .707
HDD11 .737 DNDD5 .689
HDD15 .736 DNDD17 .687
HDC5 .810 Social .784 DNTTTM6 .849 Destination .880
interaction DNTTTM2 .835 word-of-
HDC4 .783
motives DNTTTM3 .807 mouth
HDC14 .725 souces
DNTTTM4 .806
HDC1 .705 DNTTTM5 .785
HTD3 .855 Attitude .773 DNTTTM1 .532
HTD2 .833 towarding DNDC15 .918 Social .859
HTD1 .741 destination DNDC2 .902 interaction
Source: Summarized by author, 2016 DNDC13 .836 motives
DNDC16 .638
3.2.2.2. Exploratory measurement results of Danang destination DNDC9 .605
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to determine how many latent DNDD8 .792 Services in .864
variables underlie the complete set of items. An EFA was used to reduce the DNDD18 .784 destination
forty two items to a smaller, more manageable set of underlying factors. This is DNDD9 .783
helpful for detecting the presence of meaningful patterns among the original DNDD10 .767
variables and for extracting the main service factors. DNDD11 .748
The resulting exploratory solution with an orthogonal rotation indicates a DNDC6 .807 Explorator .855
nine-factor solution for Hue destination. Depend on the meaning of items in y motives
DNDC4 .803
each group, the loadings for the factors, after the elimination of the items as
DNDC3 .781
stated above, theses factor were renamed (see Table 3.11).
13 14
15
destinati
Loyalty
Items Construct New name Cronbac
with
on
DNDC5 .766
DNDC14 .761
DNDD13 .837 Infrastructu .803
HB4
DNDD12 .810 re and
2a,b,c
2a,b,c
HB2.
HB3.
DNDD14 .767 superstruct
.558 ure in
rding
natio
towa
desti
Attit
DNDD4
ude
destination
DNDC11 .757 Leisure .729
1a,b,c
1a,b,c
HB2.
HB3.
DNDC7 .675 motives
Social interation
DNDC10 .627
Exploratory
Inter-super-
Services in
destination
motives
motives
Leisure
structure
motives
Natural
sources
Figure 3.1. and 3.2: Model 1/2: Changed model after EFA
DNDC8 .594
HB1.
DNDC12 .582
2
DNTD2 .860 Attitude .902
DNTD1 .858 towarding
3a,b,c
HB1.
DNTD3 .857 destination
1a,b,c
HB1.
Source: Summarized by author, 2016
HB1.
Depend on EFA results, the theorial model 1 and 2 changed as following
destination
experience
4
Personal
data. Performance is showed in Figure 3.1, 3.2.
to
3.2.3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results
The results of both models for Hue and Danang showed that all items had
16
16
strong loadings with all t values being significant at p < .001 (all being above
the acceptable factor loading >0.35 (Hair et al 1995). The initial results showed
Evoked
choice
that the model fit the data well. Among comparative indicates, GFI, NFI, IFI,
TLI, and CFI stand out to indicate that model fits data well. Furthermore, other
model fit indices satisfy the condition of goodness-of-fit. Value of correlations
from CFA model between variables show that all of correlation scores are lower
HA4
2a,b,c
2a,b,c
HA2.
HA3.
than 0.85, which means all of these constructs are different from each other.
3.2.4. Structural Equation model and Hypothesis testing results
rding
natio
towa
desti
Attit
ude
3.2.4.1. Structural Equation model
The model’s overall fit with the data was evaluated using common model
1a,b,c
1a,b,c
HA2.
HA3.
goodness-of-fit measures estimated by AMOS. Overall, the model exhibited a
reasonable fit with the data collected. In short, the structural model is considered
Social interation
Exploratory
Inter-super-
Services in
destination
to fit the sample data reasonably.
motives
motives
structure
Leisure
motives
sources
Natural
HA1.
3.2.4.2. Hypothesis testing results
2
The hypotheses were tested based on the model as shown at figure 3.3,
1.2. The results offer strong support for the hypothesized model relationships.
3a,b,c
HA1.
Notice: *p<0.10, **p<0.05, ***p<0.001, ns: no supporting
1a,b,c
HA1.
HA1.
Information
destination
4
sources on
word-of-
(formal,
mouth)
the
15
17
.267***/.008 ns
.172***/.200*** Natural sources .075*/.216***
17
18
.048 ns /.216***
.456***
.276***
.112***
-.002 ns
Exploratory motives
.156***
.033 ns/.059 ns
.313***/.036 ns
Leisure motives
.011ns/-.021 ns
Social interation motives .121**/.109**
.031 ns .120***
Notice: Numbers do not underline are resuts of Hue, the results underline and italics are the result of Danang
Figure 3.4. Hypothesis testing results of model 1.2
18
20
Loyalty with
destination
selection and loyalty towards Hue and Da Nang. This shows that the value of
natural resources is a core value, the main attraction of tourists who decide to
choose these destinations instead of the other ones.
-.012 ns /.154***
.003 ns /.147***
(2) Sources of information on the destination have different impacts on
-.027 ns
Notice: Numbers do not underline are resuts of Hue, the results underline and italics are the result of Danang
.060 ns /.174***
-.011 ns /.209**
.119**//191***
tourists when when they select Hue and Da Nang as their destinations. For Hue,
the official sources of information have great influence on the image of the
destination, creating travel demands of tourists to Hue. Conversely, as for
.682***
.131***
.230***
.138***
-.002 ns
.042 ns
and the immanent motive of tourists, but it does not affect their loyalty.
(4) The perception of tourists on a destination includes the value of
resources, conditions for serving (interstructure and superstruture) and services
offerred at the destination, which may affect the attitude, commitment of
.461***
.280***
.144***
.077**
19
Social interation motives
offerred at nights.
(5) As for the immanent motive of tourists, tourists generally desire to
.012 ns/ -.023 ns
explore and relax when they arrive Hue and Danang. Especially, the discovry
motive has strongly affected their attitude and selection commitment for these
.175***/.144***
two destinations. However, this does not affect the loyalty of tourists towards
.267***/.146***
-.078** /.110***
Hue destination and does not remarkably affect their loyalty towards Da Nang
.123**/.148***
.084**/.196***
the attitude and loyalty of tourists towards Da Nang destination, especially the
desire of rest, relaxation, health improvement, enjoying the honeymoon
emotions and communicating with friends and strong attachment to the family.
experience to
destination
Personal
21 22