Nano Introduction
Nano Introduction
1.1 Introduction
This was the title of physicist Richard Feynman’s talk on December 29,
1959, at the Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society at The
California Institute of Technology (Caltech). In that talk, Feynman asked
many questions widely believed to be illogical at the time. Feynman be-
lieved that if we were able to control matter at the atomic or molecular
scale, we could achieve many practical advances that could revolutionize
technology and production processes.1
Feynman posed many questions related to very small-scale systems and
their enormous usefulness. For example, he discussed how the small size of
living cells aids in executing important functions for living organisms.
Feynman proposed an idea that if we could have the ability to manipulate
things as small as atoms and molecules, that these manipulations could be
used in a limitless range of technological applications. He imagined that if
we could control small-scale substances, we could create materials with new
chemical and physical properties for new applications. Essentially, Feynman
focused his talk on the idea of nanoscience and nanotechnology, but he
never explicitly stated it.1
1
2 Chapter 1
means that the material surface area is the central feature which affects re-
activity. Subdividing materials into smaller parts maintains an item’s volu-
metric size but its collective surface area increases. For example, a cube with
dimensions of 1 cm1 cm1 cm has a volume of 1 cm3, and the area of its six
surfaces equals 6 cm2. By dividing the cube into one million smaller cubes of
0.1 mm0.1 mm0.1 mm, the whole cube maintains its total volume, but
simple calculations reveal that after this division, the collective total surface
area of the cubes becomes 100-fold larger than that of the original cube. If the
cube is divided further into smaller, non-visible cubes with dimensions of
1 nm1 nm1 nm, its surface area increases by 10 million (see Sections
6.2.1, 6.2.4, Chapter 6, and 5.2.1.1, 5.2.2.2, 5.3.2, Chapter 5).
Nanoscale-sized materials possess greater surface areas than the same
amount of their larger-sized counterparts of the same material (Figure 1.1).
This is because the number of atoms and molecules that were previously
inside the materials are exposed and become surfaces. This presents a
particularly unique and interesting phenomenon at the nanoscale: nano-
materials with extremely high surface area to volume ratios will interact with
the surrounding environment more intensively. The large surface areas of
nanomaterials influence innate properties, such as the melting point,
density, solubility, mechanical properties, electrical conductivity, surface
tension, catalytic activity, and spectroscopic properties.5–11
Figure 1.1 Total surface area increases while cutting cube to smaller cubes.
larger than the radius of the Bohr exciton when the electron motion is not
confined or restricted. On the other hand, when reducing the size of a ma-
terial to the nanoscale, the material size will lessen to be smaller than the
radius of the bulk Bohr exciton. This leads to confinement of electron mo-
tion and a congested arrangement of electron holes, resulting in quantum
confinement of the electron hole pairs. Consequently, the bandgap in-
creases, and discrete energy levels appear. This increased bandgap creates
differing optical and electrical properties. As a result, nanoscale-sized ma-
terials could appear to be different colors not normally associated with
larger-sized materials of the same type (Figure 1.2).5,12–17
Nanotechnology and Chemistry 5
is at least 1000 times longer that its diameter. Differing types of nanowires
include metallic, semiconductor, and molecular nanowires. All nanowire
types are composed of repeating molecular units of organic or inorganic
materials. Two nanowire dimensions are affected by quantum confinement
due to their sizes being in nanoscale. The length of nanowire is not on the
nanoscale and therefore the quantum confinement effect does not take place.
Nanotubes are hollow nanowires with a cylindrical shape. The most well-
known nanotubes are called single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and
they consist of rolled up graphene sheets. Graphene is one of the allotropic
structures of carbon. Graphene is a single layer of graphite that is made up
of carbon atoms organized into hexagonal shapes. Each graphene carbon
atom bonds to three other carbon atoms and leaves one electron in free
motion, thus causing high electrical conductivity.
Carbon nanotubes are cylindrical structures made up of graphene sheets
with diameters in the nanoscale and lengths in the macroscale. Carbon
nanotubes are known for their strength and rigidity, stemming from the
strong covalent bonds formed between their carbon atoms. Another form of
carbon nanotube is the multiple-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT), com-
posed of multiple layers of graphene. Each nanotube in a MWCNT is con-
sidered a single molecule consisting of millions of carbon atoms. Carbon
nanotubes have tremendous electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties
that make them attractive candidates in the development of novel materials
and applications, including biomedical applications, biosensors, and energy
storage. A schematic representation of nanowires and nanotubes is shown in
Figure 1.5a and b respectively.20
Thin layer structures or nanosheets are typical examples of 2D nanostruc-
tures, as the thickness of a nanosheet is in nanoscale. The most well-known
nanosheet is graphene. As shown in Figure 1.6, graphene sheets are composed
of carbon atoms where each atom is bonded to three other ones and packed
into a sequence of hexagonal shapes. On the other hand, single-walled carbon
nanotubes and multiple-walled carbon nanotubes are 1D nanostructures
made of cylindrical structures of graphene sheets.21
Three-dimensional nanostructures are not confined to the nanometre
scale in any dimension. This means all three dimensions are at the
Figure 1.5 Schematic description of: 1.5a, nanowire and 1.5b, nanotube.
8 Chapter 1
macroscale and the electrons are free to move in all three dimensions. Three-
dimensional nanostructures can be composed of dispersed nanoparticles,
nanowires, and nanotubes.22 In nature, many examples of 3D nanostruc-
tures exist, including the blue, iridescent-colored wings of the morpho
butterfly (Morpho achilles). It was discovered that the unique, blue-colored
wings of the morpho butterfly are composed of multilayered 3D nano-
structures, as illustrated in Figure 1.7.64
The French and Russians attempted to duplicate the strong and flexible
features of the Damascus Sword in the early eighteenth century. However,
their attempts were proven unsuccessful, and they were unable to discover
the secret behind its production. In 2006, scientists were able to reveal the
production secret behind the sword’s unique features. The Damascus Sword,
which is presented in Figure 1.9, contained carbon nanotubes, one of the
most durable and flexible materials known to this day.29
As discussed above in Section 1.3, metal nanoparticles are characterized
by their distinctive colors that differ from their familiar color when they are
at the macroscale due to the phenomenon of LSPR. In Europe during the
Middle Ages, in order to color medieval stained glass, glass windows in
churches were painted with distinctive metal nanoparticle colors (see
Figure 1.10). It was discovered in later years that these colors consisted of
solutions of nanoparticles of silver, gold and copper.30,31
In 1857, nanoscience and nanotechnologies were first introduced to the
scientific arena by an English scientist named Michael Faraday. He developed
the first scientific procedure to produce the ruby color of gold nanoparticles
dispersed in an aqueous solution. In 1908, the scientist Mie explained that the
appearance of different metal colors at the nanoscale was due to the theory of
quantum size effects.32 In 1940, silicon dioxide SiO2 nanoparticles were first
produced and used as additives for black carbon in rubber reinforcement.33
Later, in 1959, Richard Feynman famously lectured at the meeting of the
American Physical Society under the title of: ‘‘There is Plenty of Room at
the Bottom’’.1 Here he postulated, ‘‘what would scientists be able to do if
they could control the material at the atom and molecular scale and re-
arrange it as they want?’’. He also described a new field of science dealing
with individual atoms and molecules to make materials and machines with
distinctive properties. This was the first known mention of a new field later
termed nanotechnology.1
The year 1974 was the first time the term ‘‘nanotechnology’’ was used to
describe different methods to produce very small particles.34 In 1976, the
Nanotechnology and Chemistry 11
This assists the user in being able to view microorganisms and cells in the
micrometre size range. However, the limited magnification power of the
light microscope was not ideal for scientists and researchers whose research
required viewing and analyzing objects in size ranges smaller than the
microscale.38
In 1931 the electron microscope was invented by German engineers Ernst
Ruska and Max Knoll. The principal adaptation to microscopic technology
used in the electron microscope was to use rays of electrons instead of visible
light. Wave properties of electrons were discovered in a cathode ray experi-
ment performed by J. J. Thomson in 1897. Einstein first proposed that light
consists of discrete units of energy known as photons: this dual nature of
light became known as the wave–particle duality. Louis de Broglie extended
the wave–particle duality principle to electrons. He argued that electrons
have both particle and wave features and proposed an equation that ex-
presses the wavelength of an electron beam as:39
l ¼ h/p (1.1)
where l is the de Broglie wavelength of electron, h is the Planck’s constant,
and p is the electron momentum. When comparing the wavelength of
electron waves to the wavelength of a visible light beam that is used in
optical microscopes, the wavelength associated with the electron is much
shorter than the wavelength of visible light. The average wavelength of
visible light is equivalent to 5000 Å, while the wavelength of electron rays
only reaches 1 Å. The discovery of the wave property of electrons is con-
sidered a new starting point for the invention of microscopes that rely on
electron waves, instead of using visible light rays. This led to much larger
magnification power, due to the very short wavelength of electron waves. The
magnification power of electron microscopes can reach up to 2.5 million
times enhanced magnification of a sample, which enables viewing at the
atomic or molecular level. The invention of electron microscopes created an
important and useful tool for studying and analyzing very small particles in
the nanoscale. Mentioned below are some of the electron microscope types
that are widely used in studies of nanoscale materials and structures.39,40