0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 23 views13 pagesGroup 4
A reading material on gender and society lesson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
G SEXUAL HARASSMENT
LESSON 21 | UNDERSTANDIN'
Lesson Objectives:
This module explains the various theoretical perspectives on Sexual Harassmen, 4),
this module discusses the laws of the Philippines on Sexual Harassment in the academe ang
in the workplace. At the end of this module, you are expected to:
1. understand fully the various theoretical perspectives on Sexual Harassment,
2. — distinguish the various theoretical perspectives on Sexual Harassment from each, Other
and
3. understand the laws of the Philippines on Sexual Harassment in the academe and j,
the workplace.
Sexual Harassment - it is an act or a series of acts involving Ennai zeae
sexual advance, reque: Ey fC er verbal or
@ government emp
ted environment.
Introduction
Sexual Harassment
Harassment and sexual harassment are recognized as a form of discrimination on the
grounds of sex and, thus, are contrary to the Principle of equal treatment between mena
women (Numbhuser-Henning and Laulom 2012).
Like many other crimes, sexual harassment is all about power, control, and domination
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2001) defined sexual harassment as a sex-based
behavior that is unwelcome and offensive to the reci
merely a problem of safety and health and unacce
form of violence primarily against women (ILO 199
ipient. Thus, sexual harassment is 1
table working conditions, but is als#
2). j
In the Philippines, Republic Act No. 7877 or the "Ane-Scvual eae ‘Act of 195
defines work-, education-,or training-related sexual harassmentis committed by anemplo”
employee, manager, supervisor, agent of the employer, teac yah
trainor, or any other person who, having authority,
another in a work or training or education environ:
her, instructor, professor, °°
i ver
influence, or moral ascendancy
cst
ment, demands, requests, or other"
BEM) 4 course Module for Gender and Society: A Hum, |
y an Ecological A
‘proachi al
wires any sexu: fayor from! the other, regardless of whether the di
uirement for submission is accepted by the object of said Act. le demand, request, or
FORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT
Sexual harassment cannot be understood from the Perspective of a sing]
jg always a combination of different predictors. Previous researchers reise aah a
sment using a number of frameworks including organizational ap ech one
ory, role theory, and attributional models of sexual harassment. Hower al nea i
common basic assumptions and can be labelled as socio-cultural models of ‘il
ssment (Sheets and Braver 1999).
However, there have been five widely accepted theories of sexual harassment that
mpt to explain the phenomenon from different angles and perspective, to wit:
Natural/Biological Theory
‘According to this model, men have stronger sex derives, and are therefore, biologically
tivated to engage in sexual pursuit of women. Thus, the harassing behavior is not meant to
offensive or discriminatory, but is merely the result of biological urges. Its assumptions
clude a natural, mutual attraction between men and women, a stronger male sex drive,
men in the role of sexual initiators. A key strength of the natural/biological perspective
that it acknowledges the innate human instincts potentially driving sexually aggressive
havior (Tangri et al. 1982).
Sex Role Spillover Theory :
This theory is based on the proposition of irrelevant gender-based role expectations
¢ individuals bring to the workplace in guiding their interactions with women. Men hold
le perceptions of women based on their traditional role in our culture.
When women take jobs outside of these traditional areas to work in the male dominated
rkplace, men rely on these gender-based expectations when interacting with women
refore, perceiving women in their gender role over and above their work role. Therefore,
are more likely to sexualize their experiences, including work experiences, and are
erefore, more likely to make sexual remarks or engage in sexualized behavior, thus
‘ounting for the fact that women experience more sexual harassment than men (Barbara
futek 1982).
Organizational Theory
Proponents of this theory propose that one of the central concepts that helps to explain
‘ual harassment is power (Cleveland and Kurst 1993). This theory proposes that sexual
.d by power and authority relations
This perspective emphasizes that the structure of organizational hierarchy invests
Gender and Sexuality
Unit IV: Political-Legal Perspective inn lead to abuse. Thus, sexual harassmeny ,
Power j, eee
in certain individuals over others, that ca! "
chal relations,
al - s,
Il about expression of male power over women that sustains patria
4. Socio-cultural Theory
and political context in which sexy,
Socio-Cultural theories examine the wider social
sexual harassment jg a
harassment is created and occurs. According to this perspective,
logical consequence of the gender inequality and sexism that already exists in society
(Gutek 1985; Thomas and Kitzinger 1997)-
This theory asserts that women’s lesser status in the larger society is reflected at the
workplace structures and culture-thus, male dominance continues to be the rule.
Herein, sexual harassment is only one manifestation of a much larger patriarcha]
system in which men are the dominant group reflecting the larger society's differentia]
distribution of power and status between the sexes. The perpetrators of sexual harassment
have no regard for women as an equal human being. Therefore, molesting women is a part
and parcel of male idea of fun in the society.
5. Feminist Theory
According to the feminist perspective, sexual harassment is linked to the sexist male
ideology of male dominance and male superiority in the society. Therefore, feminists)
theories view sexual harassmentas the product ofa gender system maintained by a dominant,
normative form of masculinity. Thus, sexual harassment exists because of the views on
women as the inferior sex, but also sexual harassment serves to maintain the already
existing gender stratification by emphasizing sex role expectations (Gutek 1985).
Relevance of Sexual Harassment Theories
‘An interpretation of these theoretical perspectives reveals that both biologically, as
well as socio- culturally, men happen to have always occupied a dominant position over
women in societies, of which the workplaces are only a part.
Considerable data have been accumulated confirming that harassment is widespread
in both the public (Culbertson et al. 1992; Fitzgerald el al. 1997) and the private sectors and
it has significant consequences for the employees’ health and psychological well-being
(Fitzgerald 1993; Schneider et al. 1997).
Therefore, the vulnerability of women as a weaker sex has traveled towards workplaces
and academe, where it is considered natural and normal for men to be responding sexually
towards women as colleagues, subordinates, and superiors.EE 'ST_—
ilippine Laws on Sexual Harassment
Republic Act No. 7877, or the Anti-Sexual Harassment Act of 1995 (RA 7877) is the
rerning law for work-, education-, or training-related sexual harassment.jronment, sexual harassme,,
Specifically, in a work-related oF employment enviro ‘
committed when: he hiring oF in the employment,
the
. 1+ dividual, or in grantin,
re-employment or continued employer” ote oan promotions, z
Sere sation, terms © unt i
sulieietial SE eos sexual favor seal ae ee
privileges; or the refusal to . way would discri , OF
ify oye which in any way" ly affect said
i cae pee pportuniis or otherwise, adverse'y employes
iminish em
tion in
() The sexual favor is made as a condi
le) Theabove acts would impair the employee's Tights °° peelleges under ing
labor laws; or
G) The above acts would result in an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environmen,
for the employee.
bs ini i nt, sexual harassment j
On the other hand, in an education or training environme! ent
committed:
(0) against oie who is under the care, custody, or supervision of the offender,
(2) against one whose education, training, apprenticeship, or tutorship is entrusted
to the offender;
@) when the sexual favor is made a condition to the giving of a passing grade,
granting of honors and scholarships, or the payment ofa stipend, allowance or
other benefits, privileges, or consideration; or
(4) when the sexual advances result in an intimidating, hostile, or offensive
environment for the student, trainee, or apprentice.
Sexual Harassment in the Civil Service
Sexual Harassment in the Civil Service is punishable by Civil Servic
Commission No. 01-0940, also known as Administrative Disciplinary Rules on Sexual
Harassment Cases.
Here, sexual harassment can be committed at the following places:
1. inthe premises of the workplace or office or of the school or training institution
2, inany place where the parties were found, as a result of work or education oF
training responsibilities or relations;
3. at work, education-, or training-related social functions;
4. _ while on official business outside the office or se
‘hool or training institution 0°
during work, school-, training ins
» or training-related travel;
‘ACourse Module for Gender and Society: A Human Ecological Approach5. at official conferences, fora, symposia, or training sessions; or
6. _ bytelephone, cellular phone, fax machine, or electronic mail.
The following forms of sexual harasstnent are committed thru: 1) Physical, (a) Malicious
touching; (b) Overt sexual advances; (c) Gestures with lewd insinuation; (2) Verbal, such as
wut not limited to, (a) requests or demands for sexual favors and (b) lurid remarks; (3) Use of
jects, pictures or graphics, letters, or written notes with sexual underpinnings; (4) Other
ms analogous to the foregoing. .Summary
‘ ind of viol i
Sexual harassment constitutes an extremely important Kind o} Hi ee Which bay
been existing and rampant in the Philippines and worldwide. This complex concept consis,
of several theories and are punished by Philippine laws.
The Philippine laws on sexual harassment punishes work-related, training, any
. TI
education environment sexual harassment. It can happen everywhere. The acts of sexyaj
harassment are also punishable by law.OPMENT
LESSON 22 || WOMEN’S ISSUES IN DEVEL
Lesson Objectives:
oat laining how d.
This module discusses the three (3) distinctive models explaining Tow develo
affects women and why women and men are affected He SoMa
ym ;
module discusses the practical approaches to the develop’
development differently. aly,
it
Atthe end of this module, the student is expected to:
1. _ understand fully the principle, model, and concept of WID, WAD and Gap,
2. distinguish the three (WID, WAD and GAD) from each other; and
3. _ determine the importance of these three principles to national developmen,
Daca
Peete trier rast
EMI tos ater cet
era ela teite
Rima ae chia cesarean ig
AC tel Pesta eer else a
RecN Teun
Oe cei igeh once ener
Leelee eke etna
sn Pe AWAD) teh
1990, 493). The G
eyse aie
productive capacities,
Introduction
Women in Development (WID)
By the 1970s, it became clear that women were being left out of development. They we
not benefiting significantly from it and in some instances,
their existing status and position
in society were actually worsened by development.
The Women in Development (WID) approached this issue-the exclusion of wom!
from development program and approaches, WID saw,
opportunity to participate in development.
‘A Course Module for Gender and Society: A Human Ecological Approach
women as a group that lacksrhe main task, thereforei+wasi to: improve uments Adcesiutd tesources aiid: heir
jcipation in development. The WID approach emphasized the importan f th
tion of women into development programs and portance of the
develop planning. Accordingly, thi
‘way to improve women’ position in society. z ingly, this was the
The WID approach, although it had limitations, increased the visibility of women i
Jopment issues. WID was successful in helping secure a prominent place for nome
es at the United Nations (UN) and other international development agencies Th ;
declared that the decade of 1975 to 1985 to be the decade for women, Serie ioe
jevements of the decade was the establishment of women in development noe
chineries.
In Zambia, for instance, it was during this time that the Women’s League of the then
political party, United National Independence Party (UNIP), was formed as the
ional machinery to address women's development issues.
MMUNICATE:
Search in the Internet about the UNIP in Zambia, as a product of WID. Provide
what you researched on the space provided.
Also search in the Internet about other programs, activities, and initiatives resulting
from WID. Provide these programs, activities, and initiatives on the space provided.
Group yourselves.
Discuss among the group about what you have researched.
WID served as the starting point of making known to the international community
the sector of women has to be part of programs for development. Likewise, several
kable programs, activities, and initiatives must be noted as these also began the strides
women empowerment.
omen and Development (WAD)
Asa result of criticisms of the WID approach, the Women and Development (WAD)
roach arose in the latter part of the 1970s. Adopting a Marxist feminist approach, the main
ent of WAD was that women had always been part of the development processes.
asserts that women have always been important economic actors.
The work they do both inside and outside the household is critical to the maintenance
society. However, this integration has only served to sustain global inequalities. In other
s, the WID approach that placed emphasis on integrating women into development
Not correct.
The main focus of WAD is on the interaction between women and development
Unit IV; Political-Legal Perspective in Gender and Sexuality RESroce: ee ‘
Processes rather than purely on strategies to integrate women into development.
WAD saw both women and men as not benefiting from the global economic structure,
because of disadvantages due to class and the way wealth is distributed. WAD argued tha,
the integration of women into development was to their disadvantage and only made thei,
inequality worse. WAD saw global inequalities as the main problem facing poor countries
and the citizens of those countries.
On the other hand, WAD has been criticized for assuming that the position of women
will improve if and when international structures become more equitable. It sees womens
positions as primarily within the structure of international and class inequalities.
WAD even underplays the role of patriarchy in undermining women's development
and does not adequately address the question of social relations between men and women
and their impact on development.
Gender and Development (GAD)
In the 1980s, further reflections on the development experiences of women gave rise to
Gender and Development (GAD). It brought together both the lessons learned from, and the
limitations of, the WID and WAD approaches.
GAD looks at the impact of development on both women and men. It seeks to ensure
that both women and men participate in and benefit equally from development and so,
emphasizes equality of benefit and control. It recognizes that women may be involved in
development, but not necessarily benefit from it.
GAD is not concerned with women exclusively, but with the way in which gender
relations allot specific roles, responsibilities, and expectations between men and women,
often to the detriment of women.
This approach also pays particular attention to the oppression of women in the family
or the ‘private sphere’ of women's lives. Asa result, we have seen projects develop addressing
issues such as VAW. GAD focuses on the social or gender relations (i.e. the division of labo)
between men and women in society and seeks to address issues of access and control over
resources and power.
GAD goes further than the other approaches in emphasizing both the reproductive and
productive role of women and argues that itis the state’s responsibility to support the social
reproduction role mostly played by women of caring and nurturing of children. As sucht
treats development as a complex process that is influenced by political, social, and economle
factors rather than as a state or stage of development.tical Approaches to the Development of Women
pra'
he Welfare Approach
Until the early 1970s, development programs addressed the needs of women almost
entirely within the context of their reproductive roles. The focus was on mother and child
health, child-care, and nutrition. Population control-or family planning as it later came to
be known-was a major focus as well due to the link made between Population growth and
poverty. The focus was clearly on meeting practical needs.
The assumptions that women's position would improve together with general
improvements in the economy, or with the economic positions of their husbands, began to
be challenged as it became clear that women were in fact losing out.aly associated with backwardness an
ny inj ‘
Women, as a result, were being increas “I with modern and progressivenes,
tional while men were increasingly identifie
The Equity Approach
" i t i
Feminist calls for gender equality were importan
main aim of which was to eliminate discrimination. iene equity approach also deal,
Contribution and share of benefits from development. The ed} wi
ibili ernment.
both the productive and reproductive roles as a responsibility of B0v
saw wom
The equity approach, in contrast to the welfare approach, EN a8 actin
Participants organizing to bring about necessary changes.
in bringing about this approach,
phasized the re-valuing of
the
The Anti-Poverty Approach
This approach focuses on both the productive and reproductive role of women with
emphasis on satisfaction of basic needs and the productivity of women. A key operation
strategy required access to income generation and waged employment. The tendency wi,
this approach was to reinforce the basic needs and ignore the strategic needs of women,
The Efficiency Approach
The efficiency approach aims to have increased production and economic growth
with an emphasis on full use of human resources. Advocates of this approach argue thit
gender analysis makes good economic sense. This is because understanding men’s and
women’s roles and responsibilities as part of the planning of development activities help
improve effectiveness and ensures that women, as well as men, can play their part in national
development.
The efficiency approach succeeded in bringing the concerns about women and gender
into the mainstream of development. However, this was done with a focus on what women
could do for development, rather than on what development could do for women.
The Empowerment Approach
‘The aim of the empowerment approach is to increase the self-reliance of women and
to influence change at the policy, legislative, societal, economic, and other levels to thet
advantage. Its main strategy is awareness-raising and situates women firmly as active
participants in ensuring change takes place.
The empowerment approach has been instrumental j
in ensuring that opportunities
are opened for women to determine their own needs, H.
lowever, empowerment has ofie?
been misunderstood tobe an end rather than a means, This has resulted in poor wont
becoming very knowledgeable about issues while realizing little change to their materi
situation, which is often dire.
‘ACourse Module for Gender and Society: A Human Ecological ‘Agpetathigummary
wiD, WAD, and
, GAD e
volved
toward:
Is achieving
‘women
em|
powerm
ent sinc
e the
mid-i9th century and
yu
utilized to underscé sobole st
" it. Asi
e theories = sais — oo
En en in nation: ee, as
ly state that we one “on
= 7 es had
ae ersa. Se
nd iy The Gotancs
ent is St
a devel a
loping
of thes
rinciple, y i
win alongside developme!
nt of the c
‘ountry.