Policy
Policy
Ph.EPABX - 23063800, 23063802, 23063803 FAX - (91-11) 23062315, 23051726, 23061068, e-man- [email protected],in
To,
All Stakeholders/Industry Associations/
MSME units/ General public
Subject: Draft Policy for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in India -req,
Sir/ Madam,
kindly refer to this Ministry's communication of even no. dated 02.03.2022 (copy
enclosed) wherein a draft policy document for MSMEs in India, as prepared by Indian
Institute of Public Administration (IIPA), was circulated for comments/suggestions of the
stakeholders.
2. In this regard, the last date for receiving comments from all stakeholders/ Industry
Associations/ MSME units/ General public on the draft document has been extended to
31.03.2022. It is requested the comments/suggestions/inputs on attached draft policy
document, if not sent earlier or additional comments if any, may kindly be emailed by
31.03.2022 to [email protected] and [email protected].
This issues with the approval of competent authority.
Yours faithfully
f}fCMt'A;{":'>;}Ol "V
(A.K. Tamaria)
Dy. Director (Policy)
Tel:23062680
Enclosed: as above
Draft National Policy for Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises (MSME) in India
Submitted to
Submitted by
6. Vision ____________________________________________________________________ 9
7. Objectives ________________________________________________________________ 9
Annexures __________________________________________________________________ 22
1. The Background
The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) is a highly vibrant and dynamic sector
of the Indian economy with over 6 crores units, providing employment to 11 crores+ people
(just next to Agriculture), having 28% share of GDP and 40% of exports. Like other sectors,
MSME also has been adversely affected in terms of productivity during COVD 19.
Accordingly, the efficiency and productivity of MSME assume further significance to achieve
overall objectives of economic development and a V shape recovery of Indian Economy.
Government of India, since the beginning of this century has initiated steps to stimulate
productivity of the sector with creation of Ministry of MSME in 2004 and enactment of
MSMED Act 2006, the first major step of its kind. The Act brought together the typology of
units and paved way for investment-based definition of MSME in the manufacturing &
services.
1 These include the Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC) and the Coir Board besides National Small Industries
Corporation (NSIC), National Institute for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (NIMSME) and Mahatma Gandhi Institute
for Rural Industrialization (MGIRI) etc.
2(i) MUDRA Bank with over US$ 50 billion disbursement, (ii) online portal for facilitating payment under SAMADHAN and
web based MSME data bank, (iii) 50% fee reduction, (iv) financial support for ZERO DEFECT ZERO EFFECT (ZED)
manufacturing etc.
3. Intercountry initiatives
Intercountry initiatives to promote MSMEs in recent years have been initiated across the
different aspects of productivity in the sector. These include: (i) Access to easy finance
particularly during CORONA Pandemic, (ii) Competitive SME policy themes (iii)
digitalization support for SMEs, (iv) Skill development of SMEs to improve/retain
competencies, and (v) Protecting start-up and scale-ups. More information on inter country
experience is given in Annexure III. Important points to be noted in this regard are:
i) COVID-19 Crisis Management Fund with attractive guarantee have been created (a)
up to 80% of loan amount for 5 years and concessions in processing fee, bridge loan
guarantee for 12 months in Belgium, (b) salary compensation and loan guarantee in
Denmark, (c) Guarantee up to 90 percent of liquidity enhancement loans in France, KfW
quick loans to MSMEs in Germany depending upon turnover along with economy
stablisation fund,(iv) loan repayment suspension in Italy along with special assistance to
stat up enterprises,(e) Relief in payment of energy bills(gas, electricity) and ‘Re Activa
València’ - liquidity measures designed to compensate for closure or losses and targeted
towards maintaining employment in Spain, (f) Recovery of two weeks sick pay per
eligible employee, loan guarantee upto 80% and bounce bank loan(25% of turn over) for
six years with one year moratorium in UK, (g) Guarantee up to 85 percent for 5-7 years
in Switzerland , and (h)Wage subsidies, working capital loans and specific grants for
sectors most impacted among MSMEs with a purpose to retain employees, improve
cash flow and cover costs of business operations in Singapore .
ii) As part of other policy initiatives (i) Singapore initiated (a) Grants to improve productivity
– Enhanced Mechanisation Credit (Mech) Scheme (b) Equity financing for successful
startups – Startup Enterprise Development Scheme (SEEDS) and (c) Non-financial
3Some recent committees include one-man committee (headed by Kumar 1917), RBI Committee and Working group (UK
Sinha committee -2018) headed by Shri SN Tripathi, DG, IIPA (2020)
iii) Digitalisation support to MSMEs is promoted by several countries which includes (i)
Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs launched the Digital Team Austria
initiative, comprising companies in the digitalization industry and offering digital services
to MSMEs free of charge for at least three months (ii) online portal in Italy for SMEs and
the self-employed for free digital services( provided by large private-sector companies)
in fields such as teleworking, video conferencing, and access to mobile data. (iii) a
platform in France called “A Stronger Grand Est” (Plus Forts Grand Est) in order to
connect around 50 innovative companies and communities, companies, associations,
healthcare establishments, etc(iv) Japan and Australia have also set up funds to provide
digitalization support to MSMEs ad (v) readymade solution plateform covering
equipment, connectivity packages, videoconferencing, collaboration platforms, digital
payments, e-commerce platforms, IT solutions and cybersecurity solutions are
established in China, Italy, Austria, Malaysia, Colombia and Singapore.
iv) Helping SMEs reskill or retain competencies is another field taken up by several
countries. It includes (i) support for a new apprentice, up to AUD 1 500 (USD 1 125)
reimbursement for equipment and services including online training when businesses
hire new apprentices, or travel accommodation allowance associated with hiring an
apprentice from rural or regional South Australia, (ii) Austria - a qualification offensive to
strengthen companies in their digitalisation and innovation agendas(iii) - the programme
on Digital Now – Investment Funding for SMEs, running until 2023, to provide financial
grants and encourage SMEs to invest more in digital technologies and in the upskilling
of their employees(iv) Singapore- subsidising absentee payroll for employees taking
training (up to 90% of their hourly basic salary)(v) Turky - E-Academy to free online
training Entrepreneurship Support Programme, with preferential treatment for women,
youth and handicapped entrepreneurs (vi) UK provides a hiring subsidy to incentivise
businesses to hire young workers (from 16 to 24 years old). The scheme covers 100%
v) Shielding startups and scale ups are taken up with specific measures such as (i) France
-an emergency plan to support start-ups for EUR 4 billion, to strengthen bridge finance
between 2 fundraising rounds, support the availability of venture capital, provide an
accelerated refund of corporate tax credits , (ii) Germany -deployed the Start-up Liquidity
Programme 2020, with funding for public venture capital investors and a Future Fund
(Zukunftsfonds) for a total of up to EUR 10 billion aimed at start-ups that get additional
liquidity to support their way out of the crisis, (iii) Turkey -grants and refundable support
for start-ups in the field of product design or software activities(iv) UK- created a support
package for innovative firms (Future Fund) tool provide high-growth with GBP 125 000
and GBP 5 million and matching funding from private investors, (v) Austria - programme
to identify and develop technology projects within start-ups, many of which receive seed
or pre-seed funding support.
4. Recent Initiatives
The Government of India has taken several steps as a follow up on recommendations and
impact of COVID 19. These cover revised definition, easy process of registration, fiscal
incentives/concessions, additional support of of Rs. 1500 million in the existing kitty(Rs 3000
million) of credit guarantee funds (28 June 2021), access to non-bank credit and expansion
of eligible sectors (retail and whole sale trade with 2. 5 crores enterprises) to MSME4.
Government of India has also consolidated labour laws, Acts Codes etc. into four codes
which include social/ economic protection, safety and security of workers including eligible
MSMEs. Similarly, several states have taken specific measures to facilitate MSMEs for Ease
of Doing Business, and access to raw material and finance. (Annexure IV). These include
Gujarat, Andhra, Nadu, Maharashtra, and Punjab. Their measures are given in Annexure
IV.
The working group formed by Ministry of MSME under chairmanship of DG IIPA in 2020
examined the whole issue in the current context and gave recommendations pertaining to
classification, registration, constitution of National Board and state level monitoring,
4 GoI has reinstated retail and whole sale trade amounting to 2. 5 crores enterprises as MSME, (ToI, 3 July 2021)
The feedback from various committees’ places forward a range of issues for suitable
resolution, although recent actions have tried to address many of them through notifications
from time to time and follow up actions. Yet, there is a need to systematically look into these
issues to form a dynamic policy by GoI to take actions and promote follow up at state level
to address specific barriers in the growth of MSMEs. The main barriers are:
(i) There is a lack of convergence and synergy among various stake holders to
enhance MSME productivity to the best of their ability. Proper mobilization,
awareness and objective oriented actions need to be identified.
(ii) Legislative and regulatory framework for MSMEs in India is quite complex and
varies from state to state. It is largely mixed with industry as a whole and only
couple of states have exclusive framework of codes, regulations and other rules.
(iii) Majority of the States have only one Facilitation Council with inadequate
representation of stakeholders which is not adequate to cater to delayed payment
cases arising in the entire State.
(ix) It is also noted that low technology level reduces the potential of MSMEs, lower
the demand for the product (lower sales) lower the profit margins. It is also
suggested that higher investment in technology and research development, higher
usage of digital and technology enabled platform is of paramount importance for
Indian MSMEs, to maintain competitiveness in the global markets
(x) Technology upgradation and capacity to efficiently operate the systems need
augmentation/ across the sectors. In this regard, Government of India has
established eighteen Tool Room Training Centres (TRTCs), 15 are in progress
and 100 more are proposed by Ministry of MSMEs which serve technology
promotion and needs to be replicated across the districts.
(xi) MSMEs need people, but skilled, who can contribute productively in the growth of
the enterprise. Estimates indicate that the MSMEs can be a big source of
employment. However, ‘Employability’ of large unemployed youths has been
questioned by many in the know of the things. This ‘unemployability’ hampers
harnessing the demographic dividends as well.
(xii) Our education system in general is not geared towards addressing the challenge
of skilling youths who can be employed in manufacturing, services or commercial
(xiii) There are two big challenges before the MSMEs skilling the workforce (i) Sparing
their own employees for skilling, especially in Micro and Small Enterprises, where
workforce is small and (ii) Availability of customized programmes and awareness
about such programmes.
(xv) Marketing assistance and apt infrastructure are the backbone for MSMEs.
Ultimately, MSMEs, with all other inputs, financial access and technological
support can survive only if they are able to sell their products and/or services.
Government, through its various schemes, has attempted to provide marketing
assistance to MSMEs in India, but a lot needs to be done properly.
(xvi) In the end, Business environment for ease of doing business and exit code needs
to strengthened.
6. Vision
Stimulate efficiency and productivity of MSME sector to generate income, employment and
become part of domestic and global value chains taking into account structural
transformation, competitive edge, demographic dividend and regional balance.
7. Objectives
(i) To facilitate build a vibrant eco-system for the rapid growth of the MSME sector,
(ii) Identify and sensitize stakeholders to promote MSMEs to the best of their
potential,
(iii) Create physical infrastructure and linkages (backward & forward), amenable to
MSMEs, Ensure access to credit, risk capital, raw material and marketing facilities
for MSMEs,
(iv) Develop a framework for accessible and affordable Technology upgradation and
Capacity Building for MSMEs as well as harnessing the potential of technological
advancement to deliver services to stakeholders especially MSMEs,
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
(i) Develop a National Policy Document and their suitable alignment at state level.
(iii) Review the framework for regulating and funding arrangements covering Central
Bank, SIDBI, other public and private sector financial institutions in line with
incentives and concessions to promote competitive enterprises.
(iv) Promote R&D activities and support incubation centres to accelerate development
and transfer of affordable and modern technology.
(v) Develop framework for marketing platform, distribution network covering states,
interstate and international business promotion for a systematic value chain.
(vii) Identify MSME action agenda on specific inter-state initiative such as DMFC,
Sagarmala, Bharatmala, DMIC and several other corridors as existing at different
places.
(ix) Develop suitable measures to safeguard interest of the employees and the
enterprise (with respect to employment), giving due cognizance to existing
regulatory framework in line with the proposed labour codes.
(xi) Centre should promote a three-tier system of MSME promotion council at Centre,
State and District level.
(xii) Support measures for EoDB at state level taking into account initiatives taken by
DPITT.
(xiii) Strengthen the system of P2P learning to promote collaboration, convergence and
competition
(xiv) Develop model Bylaws, Memorandum and norms for regulation of MSME in
accordance with the MSME Amendment Act, 2020.
(xv) Develop a platform to create an integrated database under uniform format on-
numbers, products, investment, technologies, R&D, marketing etc. in MSMEs and
provide access to stakeholders on need basis.
(xvii) Document best practices on cluster development, marketing, financing etc. and
link them with awards for best practise and follow up.
(xviii) Develop a network of Research institutions and Chairs in the area of MSMEs.
(xx) Develop suitable tracking mechanism for speedy payments which are due to
MSME.
STATE GOVERNMENT
(i) Development of State Policy on MSME in line with the National Policy on MSME.
(ii) Measures for encouraging enterprises to register and providing convenient and
easy mechanism for regulatory compliances.
(iv) Identify focus areas of MSME in the state covering cluster, products, corridors
and R&D and technology hub.
(vi) Organize state level stakeholder meets to showcase products, processes and
marketing potential. The stakeholders should include MSMEs, Banks, NBFCs,
Informal Sector representatives, civil society, DICs, local governments etc.
(vii) MFCs should document best practices and initiate award for dissemination and
adaptation.
(viii) MFCs should regularly update the database for MSME related information.
(iii) Local Level MSME Facilitation Centres (LLMFC) may engage with respective
local government in rural and urban areas for speedy regulatory compliances.
(iv) Local governments may ensure speedy registration of property and permission
for construction.
(vi) District Level MSME Facilitation Councils (DLMFC) and LLMFC should have a
wider representation of all stakeholders, including Banks and other financial
institutions, MSMEs and other industrial establishments in the region.
(vii) MFCs should prepare a facilitation plan which should include technology transfer,
skilled labour, marketing facilities, convergence and synergy with government
programme.
(ix) MFCs should document best practices and initiate local award.
(x) DICs should develop a local database for regular updation and onward
submission for a state and national database.
(xi) Special cell should be created in DIC/DLMFC to coordinate with DAY NULM
(National Urban Livelihood Mission) and National Rural Livelihood Mission
(NRLM) with local governments in urban and rural areas.
(xii) Micro enterprises should be given special attention and due representation in
DLMFC/ LLMFC.
(ii) The first major step in this direction has been taken by the Ministry of MSME by
bringing appropriate changes in the classification criterion of MSMEs. The new
definition and criterion have come into effect from 1st July, 2020. gears up to
implement the New Norms of classification of MSMEs.
(iii) Each state should have its own regulatory system exclusively for MSMEs.
(iv) Review the composition of facilitation council to widen its outreach and access to
all stakeholders.
(v) Most of the states are having one FC at the state level which is not adequate to
deal with the number of cases being filed and delay and pendency are common
feature. Keeping in view the number of cases coming before the FCs, more FCs
are required to be created. To deal with the situation there is need for establishing
more FCs and if possible/feasible, an FC should be set up in each district. Increase
(xii) Decide disputed cases within 90 days to improve liquidity of MSMEs and minimize
the incidence of NPA.
(xiii) There is need to make the Registration of micro, small and medium enterprises
easier. it is the procedural aspects of registration and licensing that have the
potential to serve as hindrances to MSME owners, owing to their tedious and
protracted nature. These need to be simplified.
(xiv) The MSMED Act does not provide any moratorium from seeking
approvals/inspections which becomes a barrier in the ease of doing business for
(xv) At present there is no provision of exemption from inspection and approval for
MSMEs giving intent to initiate business. Some State Legislations like Gujarat Act
is having such provision. Such provision needs to be built in the Central Act with
assigning the power to appropriate authority under the Act.
(xvi) Many states are having different Laws/ ordinances to regulate and promote
MSMEs. There is no uniformity in these States’ Laws. The Central Govt may
prepare a model law and circulate among states. The adoption of the model law
by the state will bring uniformity among all states.
(xvii) At present there is no provision for ease of doing business under the Act. To
provide for the same agencies at State and District levels need to be set up and
have a code outlining the processes to encourage ease of doing business.
(xviii) There is no legal framework for the re-organisation/winding up/exit of small units
leading to a huge wastage of human resources, capital (banks and financial
institutions) and physical resources (industrial land and buildings, plant,
machinery). There is need for recognizing a comprehensive and settled exit policy.
NEED FOR MSME CODE
(xix) To further ensure ease of doing business for the small and micro enterprises, there
is need for adoption of MSME Code which will provide detailed procedure for
implementing the Act which will bring clarity over the procedural aspects and bring
uniformity in the implementation of the Act at the state level and to remove any
ambiguity whatsoever.
(xx) The MSMED Act, 2006 may be reimagined as a comprehensive and holistic
MSME Code having a provision for sunset on plethora of complex laws scattered
all over the legislative framework. The code will bring clarity regarding the
regulatory norms pertaining to the entry, continuance or exit of MSMEs,
documentation and declaration procedures under several regulatory statutes.
(xxi) Accordingly MSME code will facilitate smooth and user friendly process of MSME
creation and follow up giving due regard to safeguard the interests of stakeholders
.
5 https://msme.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annualrprt.Pdf
(i) Introduce uniformity in and simplification of various loan application formats and
assessment process in line with learnings from supply chain financing and
escrowing of cash flows.
(ii) Develop customised products to assess the financing requirements based on
expected cash flows.
(iii) Use surrogates like personal guarantee, bank statement, GST data, standardized
score cards to evaluate credit worthiness of MSME borrowers.
(iv) Encourage MSMEs to obtain Zero Defect Zero Effect (ZED) Certification from
QCI, and the banks could pass on some benefit due to lower risks for such units
by way of interest/ processing fee concessions.
(v) To reduce TAT (Turnaround Time), move from Balance Sheet or turnover based
Working Capital financing to cash flow based, or supply chain/ cluster-based
financing.
(vi) In addition to PSB Loans In59 Minutes portal, develop facility for new
entrepreneurs, presently under development, needs to be expeditiously
deployed. Enhance loan limit to ₹5 core.
(vii) Ensure that all applications accorded in principal approval are disposed of within
a period of 7-10 days. Review algorithms leading to initial in-principle sanction but
final rejections by the banks’ in a time bound manner.
(viii) Build banks’ ability to capture cash flows of MSME borrowers on a regular basis,
for which tie-ups with Industry Majors/ Aggregators/ Online platforms will have to
be done by the Banks.
6 https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/sme/options-in-msme-financing/48109/
(xi) Develop a market for mezzanine financing, including appropriate financial tools.
(xii) Set up a fund for contributing to the margin money required to be brought by the
promoters of SME units taking up technological upgradation.
(xiii) Set up a Marketing Development Fund, which could provide financial assistance
in setting up distribution and marketing infrastructure/ outlets.
(xiv) National Equity Fund Scheme to support the greenfield and expansion projects.
(xv) Develop a dedicated stock exchange for the SME sector so that SMEs can access
capital markets easily, quickly and at lower costs. It will also help to provide
platform for trading of stocks belonging to SME’s and enable them raise funds at
relatively cheaper rates.
(xvi) Revise MSME Capital Investment every three to five years, and link it to inflation
rate.
(ii) Promote India’s integration into the global supply chain, bid for outsourcing
businesses, and increase their own productivity. Create an environment for
MSME joint ventures to enable Indian MSMEs to partner with their global
businesses and evolve to global levels on innovation, adapting to new
technologies and attention to quality.
7 http://www.eximbankindia.in/Assets/Dynamic/PDF/Publication-Resources/ResearchPapers/OP/20file.pdf
8 http://www.eximbankindia.in/Assets/Dynamic/PDF/Publication-Resources/ResearchPapers/OP/20file.pdf
(iv) Create Centres of Excellence with specialized staff to periodically study issues
faced by MSMEs and build capacity through SOPs, Guidelines, manuals and
checklists.
(v) Support incubation centres and link them with the enterprises to ensure product
development matching the needs of the enterprises. These incubation centres
may be set up and supported across sectors and across the country.
(vi) Ensure technology linked skill development, so that enterprises don’t face the
problem of lack of skilled workforce when they adopt the technology. This may
require linking the incubation centres with vocational training institutes.
(vii) Tool Room Training Centres as exists in select districts should be replicated at
district level across the country.
(iii) A Cell may be created in the Distinct Industries Centre, which would collect
information from various training entities about the programmes to be conducted
by them and maintain it, and would also communicate with the concerned
enterprises about the training progammes based on the demands/requests made
by them. It may put all such information on its website as well. While all the training
entities may be asked to inform these cells in each district about their calendar of
training programmes. The Cell on its own should also be collecting the information
from the websites of these training entities and other relevant sources. It may
work as City Livelihood Centre as part of convergence with NULM.
9 http://www.eximbankindia.in/Assets/Dynamic/PDF/Publication-Resources/ResearchPapers/OP/20file.pdf
(v) The duration of the programmes may be kept small or in parts, if they need to be
longer in nature, because the Micro and Small enterprises may not be in a position
to spare their employees as they mostly have small workforce.
This is one example, similar innovative strategies may be designed to connect suppliers
with buyers both national as well as international, connect training institutions to enterprises
for manpower development, connect technology developers to enterprises for technology
adoption and upgradation, etc. The role of different stakeholders based on capacities needs
to be delineated for knowledge development, management and dissemination: -
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
i) Two sets of comprehensive data bases with different verticals be created-
a. All the MSME linked offices be on one network, which includes state level and
local level agencies as well. This may deal with the statuary and legal
requirements like UAM registration, PAN application, various clearances /
NOCs, memorandum, etc.
10
AI-based systems to help more SMEs get access to credit: Nandan Nilekani
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/sme-sector/ai-based-systems-to-help-more-smes-get-access-to-credit-nandan-
nilekani/articleshow/73932351.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
iii) Statutory, legal and financial support may be provided to the entities identified for
knowledge creation and dissemination.
STATE GOVERNMENT
i) Ensure effective linkages with the Central Aggregator to timely update state
related MSME data / information on the two data bases.
iv) Develop and disseminate IEC material in vernacular languages and use other
IEC methods as well to share and communicate knowledge with stakeholders.
vii) Proactively engage with entrepreneurs and enterprises, especially in the rural
areas to encourage them updating the data and information on the Central portal
and use that portal for conducting their businesses.
viii) Coordinate with local level and para-statal agencies like financial institutions,
insurers, training institutions using data analytics and artificial intelligence.
i) The issue of procedure simplification at the export terminals may be taken up with
concerned authorities.
iii) Designated official at the major ports for looking into the export/import problems of
MSMEs.
ENFORCING CONTRACTS
i) Cheap legal help may be arranged at the district level for MSMEs for non-judicial works,
like drafting of the contracts, advise for techno-legal formalities, etc.
ii) Mechanism may be developed to have trigger/alarm mechanism to alert the
stakeholders about the tensions.
iii) A state level helpline or national level chat service may be planned for advising on
contractual issues.
iv) Micro-enterprises may be provided full legal help upto a certain point.
(ii) For the Micro Enterprises, the arbitration route at the district level may be more
speedy as well as convenient, with a provision to escalate the case under certain
conditions.
(iii) Need to ensure recovery rate, as per EoDB methodology, to be better than
national average for micro and small enterprises.
(iv) Monitoring of data input from partners for early warning indicators to be done by
banks on an on-going basis11.
(v) Set up an independent Rehabilitation Fund for rehabilitation of sick, micro, small
and medium enterprises.
11 https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationReportDetails.aspx?UrlPage=&ID=924#CH7
1. The Committee examined the two suggested bases of redefining the MSMEs, i.e.
turnover and employment and found that they do not add anything worthwhile over
the present system.
2. It is recommended that the Government may set up a group to look into the
structures of different industries and suggest appropriate investment-bands for
each subsector.
10. The Committee recommends the abolition of the Advisory Committee from the
MSMED Act 2006.
11. The Committee feels that there is an urgent need for creating a comprehensive
MSME database, which can be used to deliver a range of services to individual and
groups of enterprises.
12. In order to give an incentive to the micro entrepreneurs to get registered, the
government can offer them free insurance based family medical care scheme on
13. The Committee recommends that the issue of a comprehensive MSME database
be considered in consultation with state governments and other subject matter
ministries and then placed before the proposed National Authority at the earliest.
14. It is proposed that the new entrepreneurs should be given a provisional registration.
Further, a new field of women entrepreneurs, Scheduled Caste entrepreneurs and
Scheduled Tribe entrepreneurs should be added in the alphanumeric registration
number.
15. An appropriate Grievance Redressal Mechanism and facility for online application
for Central and State Government schemes may be suitably incorporated in the
portal. Ideally, a single application for bank loans should also be incorporated in
the proposed portal to reach the banks.
16. It is proposed that a Task Force be constituted for preparing the scheme of a
comprehensive Database to consider the Committee's suggestions and submit a
proposal for MSME INDIA within a short time.
17. Good programmes and schemes should be adopted with such modifications as
appropriate e.g. Credit Guarantee Scheme, Credit Linked Capital Subsidy scheme,
SFURTI, PMEGP etc.
18. The MSMED Act, 2006 (Act of 2006) and the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small
Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertaking Act. 1993 (Act of 1993) are Special Acts
and should supersede all earlier Special Acts.
19. It is urged that the discussions on a single legislation for MSEs with less than 40
workers should gather pace and culminate into a positive outcome for the benefit
of the MSME Sector.
20. The Committee recommends that efforts should be made to provide social security
cover for micro entrepreneurs.
21. Micro and small enterprises play a major role in employment generation in the
country and the Bankruptcy Code may cause avoidable hardship for them. It is
therefore suggested that a study may be undertaken to assess the likely impact of
the code on the MSME Sector.
22. The Telangana model for ensuring statutory clearances for start-ups could be worth
replicating
23. In Gujarat also DICs have facilitation counters at five centres in the big cities. This
number is going to be increased to 10. This is also worth considering.
26. The Committee sees merit in these requests and advocates the State Governments
to allow conversion of lease hold industrial plot to free hold bases after evaluating
the success of a unit after five years. Similarly, the Committee feels that if a
particular entrepreneur is willing to satisfy all norms; especially those related to
pollution and environment, easy conversion of agricultural land for micro and small
industrial uses may be allowed.
27. It is proposed that a Land Bank be created by State Governments with support from
the Central Govemment to promote them for Industrial development.
28. There is a critical need for restoration and renovation of existing Industrial Estates.
29. To promote Micro units in the Rural Areas, it is recommended that small Rural
Business Zones (RBZ) be created after conducting baseline survey of the
resources and skills available in the rural areas.
30. It is also proposed that the State Governments may be encouraged to identify mid-
sized land parcels in urban and semi-urban areas for development as Business
Parks to be leased to SMEs.
31. The Central Government may request the State Governments to lease land to the
State Industrial Development Corporation and or Private Promoters who will,
through Public Private Partnership develop an Integrated Business Park
(IBP)(mostly Sector Specific) through an Spy company.
32. The Integrated Business Park should be on a "Plug and Play Model" so that the
SMEs come to and rent out j take on lease the facility with their business knowledge
supported by their investment in Plant and Machinery.
33. Industrial and Artisan Clusters grow naturally and many times in an unplanned
manner and as such their growth gets stunted. It is recommended that such clusters
be identified and appropriate infrastructure be planned for them. Such
Infrastructure can be called.Cluster Parks.
37. The Committee feels that the MSME-DIs should be developed as Udyami Udyog
Mitras and Information, awareness and Guidance on all Schemes should be their
core activities. Furthermore, Reimbursement based schemes should be
administered directly by DIs as much as possible. They can be converted into
clearing houses of available technologies and helpers in technology adaptation.
38. A dedicated TV Channel named as Udyam Bharat can be started in the lines of Lok
Sabha TV and Rajya Sabha TV. This could be an effective instrument for
disseminating information and will enable best practices and progressive
entrepreneurial culture to be showcased.
39. There is an urgent need for accreditation of truly representative Associations by the
Government and to encourage creation of forum of Associations industry wise/zone
wise. Accredited Associations can find a place in the Boards of Public sector Banks
/Fts.
40. On Credit and Finance, the Committee recommended improvements in the
MUDRA scheme.
41. The limits for giving loans under various categories of MUDRA should be enhanced
42. Categorization of Banks' Credit to MSMEs through NBFCs under the Priority Sector
and loans given by banks to NBFCs for the purpose of on-lending to Micro, Small
and Medium Enterprises should be treated as indirect finance to MSMEs eligible
for classification under the Priority Sector lending of banks.
43. Classification of loans to medium enterprises should exclude from the priority sector
and Priority sector lending certificate should be discontinued.
45. The Committee recommends that The Reserve Bank of India should permit the
establishment of MSME centric Non-Banking Finance Companies (NBFCs) and
specially created 'MSMEs' Receivables Financing Funds' for limited purpose of
promoting financing against Receivables and discounting of their supply bills.
These NBFCs or Special Purpose Funds can be promoted in joint sector by the
Government through Banks or other Institutions jointly with the Private Sector.
These NBFCs & Funds can be allowed to attract investment from domestic and
international sources and could be operated by banks or the private sector to
finance MSMEs' book debts or to discount MSME supply bills. These NBFCs would
serve only MSME customers primarily to finance their receivables & book debts or
to discount their supply bills.
46. The Committee recommends that in order to obviate the financial constraints faced
by MSMEs on account of delayed payment of their bills E-financing web portal
where all such supply bills and receivables could be offered for discounting or
financing to banks and other financing institutions like NBFCs and factoring
companies should be established. This financing mechanism should enable
availability of an E-platform on which MSMEs can upload their supply bills for
discounting by interested parties who should offer their competitive discounting
rates for the MSMEs to opt for any of them keeping in view their competitive rates.
This E- platform should enable levying of interest for delayed period on the buyers.
47. The Committee recommends that the Government should meet a part of
expenditure of SMEs incurred by them in the initial listing of their equity on the SME
exchanges. This part reimbursement of listing expenditure could either be limited
upto 50% of the total listing expenditure or Rs.I0 Lakhs whichever is lower.
48. The Committee recommends that the Government should provide tax exemption
for the investments in IPOs of SME companies under section 80C of the Income
Tax Act 1961 within the overall prevailing ceiling limit of Rs. 1,50,000/-.
49. The Committee recommends to establish a separate 'SME Equity Investment Fund'
by the Ministry of MSME to be managed by a professionally run entity of fund
managers.
50. Acceptance of MSME Performance and Credit Rating by Banks for lending: The
Committee recommends that the Performance and Credit Rating Scheme of the
(KNN Bureau)
Findings
Even after a journey of more than one decade, the MSMEs sector is still posed with
numerous challenges such as inadequate flow of funds in the sector; costly financing12, lack
of full swing procurement by Government sector from MSMEs; delay in payments ; limited
role of SIDBI; complex registration process; external movement of start-ups amid favourable
external environment thereon in terms of tax concessions, enabling infrastructure, lack of
effective enterprise development centres; inadequate collaboration between MSMEs and
R&D institutions including innovation offering companies and educational institutions; poor
access to services in areas such as improvement of technology, product development and
marketing techniques; etc.
Though banks are cautious about the high risk perception against the collateral free loans,
but it would facilitate the credit diversification of banks.13 Public sector banks have higher
credit exposure with MSMEs (around two-fifth) whereas private sector banks account for
about one third of total MSME credit with comparatively lesser NPAs.14 The credit quality of
MSMEs availing loans from private sector banks and NBFCs is significantly better and as
of June 2018, their NPA levels on account of MSME loans were 3.9% and 5%, respectively.
In this regard the strengthening of information flow environment in the present
recommendations would surely enhance the quality credit for public sector banks, and
thereby bridge the gap of credit shortfall.
Recommendations
In nutshell, the panel recommendations as below specially focus on credit aspect of the
MSME sector, would have implications towards quality credit without delay and appropriate
scale, thereby enabling the MSMEs in capacity building for sustained growth. These are:
12
For the MSME sector, interest costs have not fallen meaningfully as banks have not transmitted the entire reduction in
the repo rate to customers.
13
Indian banks have much exposure towards large industries.
14
The credit quality of MSMEs availing loans from private sector banks and NBFCs is significantly better and as of June
2018, their NPA levels on account of MSME loans were 3.9% and 5%, respectively.
2. Cash flow-based lending, revising collateral free loan limit from ₹10 lakh to ₹20
lakh, Credit guarantee scheme for MSMEs,
6. The raising of collateral loan for the micro and small enterprises which have
received comparatively lower credit pie as of medium and large enterprises.
8. The digital infrastructure for sharing credit information and assessing the historical
performance of borrowers are needed for promotion of green-field projects in the
MSME sector through joint venture mode.
9. Financial engineering in terms of inviting the private players along with new
products would render the competitive lending practices to the MSMEs, thereby
helping in flowing appropriate credit with reasonable cost.
12. Other supports should also cover in terms of strengthening of MSME Export
Promotion Council and a national (and state level) Council as a special purpose
vehicle for crowd funding of MSMEs, out-of-court assistance to MSMEs, insurance
coverage to MSME employees such as coverage under Ayushman Bharat to cope
with natural calamities, etc.
At present, countries across the world is taking various steps in formulating growth
strategies for SMEs sector and ensuring them to move along with pace of GDP. This section
discuss about the selected best practice taken by different countries for
I. Measures taken by selected countries from the UNECE region to support MSMEs during
COVID-19 crisis
8. United Kingdom: Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) relief It includes refund to cover
United Kingdom package up to 2 weeks' SSP per
has introduced eligible employee off work
various loan due to COVID19. The
schemes and companies can reclaim
employee sick pay expenditure for any
packages employee who has claimed
SSP because of COVID-
19. This scheme covers
full-time employees, part-
time employees,
employees on agency
contracts and employees
on flexible or zero-hour
contracts. Employers can
claim back from both the
Coronavirus Job Retention
Scheme and the
Coronavirus Statutory Sick
Pay Rebate Scheme for
the same employee but not
for the same period of time
for an employee.
Coronavirus Business Under this scheme
Interruption Loan Scheme launched on 23 March
2020, MSMEs with an
annual turnover of less
than £45 million can
borrow up to £5 million with
a government guarantee
covering 80% of the loan.
The loan will only be
available from accredited
lenders, and the first year
will be interest-free.
Bounce Back Loan Allows MSMEs affected by
the pandemic to receive
loans of up to 25% of their
annual turnover (capped at
£50,000) from accredited
lenders. These loans have
a term of up to 6 years and
benefit from a payment
holiday during the first
year. The Government of
the United Kingdom will
guarantee the amounts
Source: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pdfs/geee/Guidelines_MSME_EE-
RE_Final.pdf
A. Singapore: Singapore Ranked No. 1 in the World Bank’s “Doing Business” survey
consistently in the world. Singapore government is famed for its business-friendly
policies and pro-business attitude. Various government agencies and statutory boards
have programs and schemes targeted at different industries with different objectives.
Following are some examples from Singapore that could serve as reference for
designing policies and programs to support competitive SMEs. Following measures
have been taken by Singapore for SMEs
With the vision of “creating globally competitive SMEs across all sectors that enhance
wealth
creation and contribution to social well-being of the nation“ and to become a high income
nation by 2020, the Malaysia SME Master Plan 2012 – 2020 clearly articulated 4 goals
and 32 initiatives to change the SME landscape in the country. The philosophy adopted
in this master plan is very much in line with the concept of competitive SME.
The following two initiatives serve to illustrate how they achieve the goals of expanding
number of high growth and innovative firms and of raising productivity. Though these
initiatives are yet to crystalize as specific policies, they are helpful in reflecting the thought
process of policy designing.
i. Malaysia is developing the Technology Commercialisation Platform (TCP) to
encourage innovation. Under this program, the current incubation facilities are
integrated under one national platform; programme managers are incentivised upon
successful commercialisation; and SMEs and potential financers are better linked.
Italy launched an initiative called Digital Solidarity, which includes the creation of
an online portal where SMEs and the self-employed can register to access free
digital services provided by large private-sector companies in fields such as
teleworking, video conferencing, and access to mobile data.
In France, the Région Grand Est has set up a platform called “A Stronger Grand
Est” (Plus Forts Grand Est) in order to connect around 50 innovative companies
and communities, companies, associations, healthcare establishments, etc.
within the region to identify innovative products and services that could help
overcome the crisis and rebound.
2. Grants and funding for digitalization – Direct financial support for procuring
technologies/services to accelerate digitalization. In Germany, for instance, the
government has set up dedicated funds for digitalization and ICT advancement
of MSMEs. Similarly, Japan offers subsidies to support teleworking, adoption of
IT solutions and developing e-commerce sales channels
Australia announced in September 2020 a package of AUD 800 million to
remove outdated regulatory barriers, boost the capability of small businesses and
back the uptake of technology across the economy. The measures include
spending AUD 29 million on the rollout of 5G high-speed Internet and
AUD 28.5 million to promote open banking, where customers can shop around
for financial services with their own data. It also includes AUD 6.9 million to test
the use of blockchain to cut compliance costs.
In November 2020, France earmarked EUR 100 million to support small
business in building up online operations. In addition, the government platform
FranceNum, launched in 2018 to connect SMEs willing to digitalise with a network
of specialised consultants, became a platform for live information on support
initiatives from national and local governments, and the private sector. To
increase its reach, a daily radio show discusses upcoming digital trends.
Some countries have expanded the existing measures for the training and skills
development of SMEs or have launched new ones.
Australia adjusted its national My Skills programme that subsidises upskilling,
reskilling and vocational training. The support includes up to AUD 5 000 (USD 3 750)
for hiring a new apprentice, up to AUD 1 500 (USD 1 125) reimbursement for
equipment and services including online training when businesses hire new
apprentices, or travel accommodation allowance associated with hiring an apprentice
from rural or regional South Australia. Furthermore, in October 2020, the government
provided an additional AUD 1.2 billion (USD 900 million) to create 100 000 new
apprenticeships and traineeships, with a 50% wage subsidy for businesses that
employ graduates.
Germany has designed the programme Digital Now – Investment Funding for SMEs,
running until 2023, to provide financial grants and encourage SMEs to invest more in
digital technologies and in the upskilling of their employees. Applying SMEs must
present a digitalisation plan to invest in either software/hardware or employee
training.
Singapore is subsidising absentee payroll for employees taking training (up to 90%
of their hourly basic salary) through the Skills Future Singapore initiative. This
initiative especially targets the food service and retail sectors.
Germany has deployed the Start-up Liquidity Programme 2020, with additional
funding for public venture capital investors (both individual funds and funds of funds)
and a Future Fund (Zukunftsfonds) for a total of up to EUR 10 billion aimed at start-
ups that get additional liquidity to support their way out of the crisis.
Turkey proposes grants and refundable support for start-ups to promote RDI in the
field of product design or software activities. A product development module has
been added to the 2021 call for projects. The SME Technology Support Programme
The UK has created a support package for innovative firms (Future Fund) that will
provide high-growth UK-based companies with between GBP 125 000 and GBP 5
million and matching funding from private investors. In addition, targeted support is
channelled to the most R&D-intensive SMEs in the form of grants and loans.
States are one of the most important stakeholders as far as MSMEs are concerned. A robust
MSME sector provides employment to the unemployed in the states and also helps the
state’s economy. They have always been a focus area, but MSMEs have started receiving
increased attention in view of the realization of their potential in the overall development of
the state. Some of the important initiatives that have been taken by the states are---
1. GUJARAT
Gujarat has been one of the top performers as far as growth of MSME sector is concerned.
Three initiatives stand out-
(i) Scheme to help MSMEs reduce energy consumption. It plans to help MSMEs in the
state to reduce their energy consumption as well as carbon footprint using latest
technologies in conservation. Gujarat Energy Development Agency (GEDA) has
devised a long term plan for the same. One of the ways being promoted by it is to use
the `Waste heat’, which is usually emitted in the form of air, in these units. There is
potential of saving almost 2500 MW electricity through harnessing of ‘Waste heat’.
GEDA is planning to share the cost of equipment with MSMEs.
(ii) In October 2019, the Gujarat state cabinet decided to bring Gujarat MSME Facilitation
Ordinance to improve ‘Ease of Doing Business’ for MSME sector. This is to help a
person who intends to set up an industrial unit. On average, units need permissions
from 12 different departments and it delays the production up to 3 years. They would
now be not required to obtain various approvals in the first 3 years of their operations.
After that they would be required to get the necessary approvals in 6 months. The
Ordinance proposed ‘Investors Facilitation Agency’ at the State level and ‘District
Industries Centre’ at the district level.
(iii) Gujarat Govt. inked a MoU with the National Stock Exchange to help MSMEs in fund
raising and understand hedging foreign-exchange fluctuations for MSMEs engaged in
imports and exports. The state is also planning to create a fund on the NSE platform
to encourage investors to invest in the state.
The NSE would help MSMEs in listing on NSE’s SME exchange platform EMERGE. The
Govt. would bear a part of the expenses related to the listing. EMERGE has 205 companies
listed currently, of which 64 firms are from Gujarat.
2. KERALA
Kerala government has modified ‘Kerala Single Window Interface for Fast and Transparent
clearance' (KSWIFT) to facilitate immediate clearance for investment proposals up to Rs 10
crore. It has upgraded KSWIFT portal for the purpose. 15 Departments/ Agencies are
available on the platform reducing the physical touch-points and bureaucratic delays.
3. ANDHRA PRADESH
Andhra Pradesh has MSME Parks Policy-2018-23, under which it is to set up MSME Parks
in all the Assembly constituencies spanning into 25 to 100 acres to realize their potential.
The government intends to make large enterprises as ‘anchor investors' for MSME Parks.
With a motive to make large enterprises to enter into business relationships with the
MSMEs, the government will allocate a maximum of 10% of the area in each park to them.
4. TAMIL NADU
The government has put in place the concept of ‘ease of doing business’ and a ‘single
window portal’ for the MSME sector to facilitate the functioning of the industries. A dedicated
desk has been set up in every district of the state to help the MSMEs in settling dues related
to the sector from the industries. The state provides different type of subsidies to support
the MSMEs.
• 20% low tension power tariff subsidy for the first 36 months from the date of
commencement of commercial production or from the date of power connection,
whichever is later.
• 25% capital subsidy on the value of eligible plant and machinery subject to a
maximum of Rs.30 lakh.
• 5% additional capital subsidy on the value of eligible plant and Machinery for
enterprises set up by women, SC/ST, differently abled and transgender
entrepreneurs subject to a maximum of Rs.2 lakh.
• 25% additional capital subsidy on the value of eligible plant and machinery
installed to promote cleaner and environment friendly technologies subject to a
maximum of Rs.3 lakh, if certified by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board.
• 20% low tension power tariff subsidy for the first 36 months from the date of
commencement of commercial production or from the date of power connection
whichever is later.
A Special Capital Subsidy of 25% on the eligible plant and machinery subject to a
maximum of Rs.30 lakh is extended to 13 thrust sector enterprises setup anywhere
in the State viz., Electrical and Electronic Industry, Leather and Leather goods, Auto
parts and components, Drugs and Pharmaceuticals, Solar Energy Equipment, Gold
and Diamond Jewellery for exports, Pollution Control equipments, Sports Goods and
Accessories, Cost effective building materials, Readymade Garments, Food
Processing, Plastic and Rubber Industries.
d. Generator Subsidy
The Micro, Small and Medium manufacturing enterprises anywhere in the State,
which purchase Generator sets up to 320 KVA capacity are eligible for a Generator
Subsidy at 25% of the cost of the generator set, subject to a maximum of Rs.5 lakh.
e. Back-ended Interest Subsidy
6. PUNJAB
• Approval for units in approved Industrial Parks will be given in three working days.
• For new enterprises outside approved Industrial Parks, the decision on the
“Certificate of In-Principle Approval” shall be taken by the District Level Nodal Agency
within 15 working days, as per the recommendations of the Scrutiny Committee.
• Unit owners will have three and a half years after setting up the unit to obtain seven
approvals from three departments: the sanction of building plans; issuance of
completion/occupation certificate for buildings; registration of new trade licences
under The Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 and The Punjab Municipal Corporation Act,
1976; change of land use under The Punjab Regional and Town Planning and
Development Act, 1995; application for No-Objection Certificate under The Punjab
Fire Prevention and Fire Safety Act, 2004; approval for factory building plan under
The Punjab Factory Rules, 1952; and registration of shops/establishments under The
Punjab Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1958.
• The industries involving hazardous processes will have to obtain a Fire NOC and get
approval for the factory building plan before setting up the unit.
• All units will have to get environmental clearance from the Pollution Control Board
beforehand.
• With this, a District Bureau of Enterprise (DBE) would be established in each district,
headed by the Deputy Commissioner as chief executive officer, while General
Manager of the District Industries Centre (DIC) would act as the Additional Chief
Executive Officer, with other members to be notified by the Government from time-
to-time.
• The DBE shall be designated as District Level Nodal Agency, which would work
under the overall superintendence, direction and control of the State Government
and the State Nodal Agency.
• The District Level Nodal Agency will assist and facilitate MSME enterprises in the
State, maintain record of ‘Declaration of Intent’ received and issue ‘certificate of In
Principle Approval’ under the Act.
There is an exclusive legislation for micro, small and medium enterprises known as the
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.
The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act was notified in 2006
to address different issues affecting MSMEs, inter alia, the coverage and investment ceiling
of the sector. The MSMED Act seeks to facilitate the development of these enterprises as
also enhance their competitiveness. The MSMED Act has the following key provisions:
- Establishment of a National Board for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises headed
by the Minister for MSME. The role of the Board is to examine the factors affecting
the promotion and development of MSMEs, review the policies and programmes of
the Central Government and make recommendations in regard to facilitating the
promotion and development and enhancing their competitiveness.
- It provides the first-ever legal framework for recognition of the concept of “enterprise”
which comprises both manufacturing and service entities. It defines medium
enterprises for the first time and seeks to integrate the three tiers of these enterprises,
namely, Micro, Small and Medium.
On 9 May 2007, the erstwhile Ministry of Small Scale Industries and the Ministry of Agro
and Rural Industries were merged to form the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises (M/o MSME).
15 https://msme.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annualrprt.pdf
In order to provide a simpler and faster mechanism to address the stress in the accounts of
MSMEs and to facilitate the promotion and development of MSMEs, the Ministry of Micro,
Small and Medium Enterprises, Government of India, vide its Gazette Notification dated
May 29, 2015 notified a ‘Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation of Micro, Small and
Medium Enterprises’. Reserve Bank of India, after continuous follow up, has also issued
guidelines to the Banks on 17.3.2016. Under these guidelines Banks have created a
structure for finalising corrective action plan for revival & rehabilitation of MSMEs.
Organizational Setup17
The M/o MSME has two Divisions called Small & Medium Enterprises (SME) Division and
Agro & Rural Industry (ARI) Division. The SME Division is allocated the work, inter- alia, of
administration, vigilance and administrative supervision of the National Small Industries
Corporation (NSIC) Ltd., a public sector enterprise and the three autonomous national level
entrepreneurship development/training originations. The Division is also responsible for
implementation of the schemes relating to Performance and Credit Rating and Assistance
to Training Institution, among others. SME Division is also responsible for preparation and
monitoring of Results- Framework Document (RFD) as introduced in 2009 by the Cabinet
Secretariat under Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System (PMES). The ARI
Division looks after the administration of two statutory bodies viz. the Khadi and Village
Industries Commission (KVIC), Coir Board and a newly created organization called
Mahatma Gandhi Institute for Rural Industrialization (MGIRI). It also supervises the
implementation of the Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP).
16 https://msme.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annualrprt.pdf
17 https://msme.gov.in/about-us/about-us-ministry
18 https://msme.gov.in/about-us/about-us-ministry
The Ministry of MSME runs numerous schemes targeted at a) providing credit and financial
assistances, b) marketing assistance and infrastructure development, and c) technological
and quality upgradation. A snapshot of all the schemes is provided below:
3) Credit Guarantee Trust Fund For MSEs (CGTMSE) - Provision of collateral free credit for
MSMEs
Guarantees are provided for extending collateral free lending to Micro and Small Enterprises
through banks and financial institutions (including NBFCs). The Scheme covers collateral
free credit facility (term loan and/ or working capital) extended by eligible lending institutions
to new and existing micro and small enterprises up to Rs. 200 lakh per borrowing unit.
1. Credit Linked Capital Subsidy Scheme (CLCSS) for technology upgradation of micro
and small enterprises by providing 15 per cent upfront capital subsidy.
2. Financial Support to MSMEs in Zero Defect Zero Effect (ZED) Certification Scheme
to create awareness amongst MSME’s about ZED manufacturing and motivate them
for assessment of their enterprise for ZED and supports them.
3. International Cooperation (IC) Scheme -Technology infusion and/ or upgradation of
Indian micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME’s), their modernisation and
promotion of their exports are the principal objectives of assistance under the
scheme.
4. ISO 9000/ISO 14001 Certification reimbursement Scheme [NMCP Scheme]
5. National Manufacturing Competitiveness Programme (NMCP) – It aims to develop
global competitiveness among Indian MSME’s by improving their processes,
designs, technology and market access. There are ten components of NMCP which
are likely to spur innovation and growth in the MSME sector. These include marketing
support/assistance to MSME’s (Bar code), Entrepreneurial and managerial
development of SME’s through incubators, Enabling manufacturing sector to be
competitive through Qms & Qtt, Building awareness on intellectual property rights
(IPR), lean manufacturing competitiveness for MSMEs, design clinic for design
Expertise to MSME’s manufacturing sector (design), marketing assistance &
technology upgradation, technology and Quality upgradation support to MSMEs.
MSME Ministry with World Bank’s loan assistance is implementing Technology Centre
Systems Programme (TCSP) to establish 15 new Tool Rooms and Technology
Development Centres (TCs) and upgrading the existing 18 TCs across the country. Its aim
is to provide high end skilling and technical support to MSMEs. In a bid to bring MSMEs on
digital platform and for providing them digital identity, organizations like Common Service
Centres (CSC), Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India (EDII) on boarded.
Awareness programmes and workshops are being organized all over the country for MSME
stakeholders and for bringing all MSME service providers on a single platform. Recently,
President of India launched “MSME Sampark” portal – a digital platform where the recruiters
would have access to the increasing talent pool of trained manpower, facilitating their
placement. Another prominent Digital Platform is Government e-Marketplace. (GeM), a one
stop portal for facilitating online procurement of common use Goods & Services required by
various Government Departments / Organizations / PSUs, thereby increasing efficiency and
transparency. It will help in boosting the growth of MSMEs, small manufacturers and other
sellers.
3) Scheme for Micro & Small Enterprises Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP)
The Ministry has adopted the cluster development approach as a key strategy for enhancing
the productivity and competitiveness as well as capacity building of Micro and Small
Enterprises (MSEs) and their collectives in the country.
Number of employees
MSME Definitions
(number of employees)
Country
Micro Small Medium Large
Country
Micro Small Medium Large
Country
Micro Small Medium Large
MSME Definitions
(assets,
Country local currency, unless otherwise noted)
Curren
Micro Small Medium Large
cy
Australia AUD
500,000- 10,000,000- >150,000,00
<500,000- 10,000,000 150,000,000 0 Services;
Services; Services; Services; >300,000,00
<5,000,000 5,000,000- 100,000,000- 0
Banglade Manufacturin 100,000,000 300,000,000 Manufacturi
sh g Manufacturing Manufacturing ng BDT
Brazil BRL
Canada
>800,000,00
3,000,000- 50,000,000- 0
50,000,000 800,000,000 Construction
<3,000,000 Construction; Construction; ;
Construction 20,000,000- 50,000,000- >100,000,00
; 50,000,000 100,000,000 0 Real
<20,000,000 Real Estate; Real Estate; Estate;
Real Estate; 1,000,000- 80,000,000- >120,000,00
<1,000,000 80,000,000 120,000,000 0 Leasing
Leasing and Leasing and Leasing and and
Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial
China Services Services Services Services CHN
France EUR
Germany
1,000,000- 20,000,000- >50,000,000
<1,000,000 20,000,000 50,000,000 Services;
Services; Services; Services; >100,000,00
<2,500,000 2,500,000- 50,000,000- 0
Manufacturin 50,000,000 100,000,000 Manufacturi
India g Manufacturing Manufacturing ng INR
50,000,000 – >
Indonesi < 500,000,000 500,000,001 – 10,000,000,
a 50,000,000 million 10,000,000,000 000 IDR
Israel ILS
Italy EUR
Japan JPY
<
8,000,000,0 ≥8,000,000,
00 000
Manufacturin Manufacturi
g; < ng; ≥
3,000,000,0 3,000,000,0
00 Mining, 00 Mining,
Korea, Construction Construction
Rep. , , KRW
MSME Definitions
(turnover, local currency, unless otherwise noted)
Country
Curren
Micro Small Medium Large
cy
Australia AUD
Banglad
esh BDT
Brazil BRL
Canada
10,000,0000-
100,000,000
Software;
5,000,000-
500,000- 200,000,000
10,000,000 Retail;
Software; 10,000,000-
1,000,000- 300,000,000
5,000,000 Warehouse;
Retail; 10,000,000-
1,000,000- 1,000,000,000 >50,000,000
10,000,000 Information; Property
Warehouse, 10,000,000- management;
Information, 2,000,000,000 >100,000,000
<500,000 Real Estate; Real Estate; Software,
Software; 1,000,000- 20,000,000- Accommodati
<1,000,000 20,000,000 300,000,000 on,
Retail, Postal, Postal; Restaurant;
Warehouse, Accommodation 20,000,000- >200,000,000
Postal, , Restaurant; 100,000,000 Retail;
Accommoda 1,000,000- Accommodation >300,000,000
tion, 80,000,000 , Restaurant; Warehouse,
Restaurant, Tenancy; 80,000,000- Postal,
Information, 2,000,000- 1,200,000,000 Transportatio
Real Estate, 30,000,000 Tenancy; n;
Tenancy; Transportation; 30,000,000- >400,000,000
<2,000,000 3,000,000- 300,000,000 Heavy
Transportati 20,000,000 Transportation; Industry,
on; Heavy Industry; 20,000,000- Wholesale;
<3,000,000 3,000,000- 400,000,000 >800,000,000
Heavy 60,000,000 Heavy Industry; Construction;
Industry, Construction; 60,000,000- >1,000,000,0
Construction 5,000,000- 800,000,000 00
; <5,000,000 10,000,000 Construction; Information;
Property Property 10,000,000- >1,200,000,0
managemen management; 50,000,000 00 Tenancy;
t; 10,000,000- Property >2,000,000,0
<10,000,000 50,000,000 management; 00 Real
China Wholesale Wholesale 50,000,000- Estate CHN