JAN VAN Arterial BP and Glaucoma 24h
JAN VAN Arterial BP and Glaucoma 24h
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpad111
Advance access publication 23 November 2023
Original Article
Original Article
The Relevance of Arterial Blood Pressure in the
Management of Glaucoma Progression: A Systematic
Review
BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of global blindness and is expected to co-occur more frequently with vascular
morbidities in the upcoming years, as both are aging-related diseases. Yet, the pathogenesis of glaucoma is not entirely elucidated
and the interplay between intraocular pressure, arterial blood pressure (BP) and ocular perfusion pressure is poorly understood.
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aims to provide clinicians with the latest literature regarding the management of arterial BP in
glaucoma patients.
METHODS: A systematic search was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Articles written in English
assessing the influence of arterial BP and systemic antihypertensive treatment of glaucoma and its management were eligible for
inclusion. Additional studies were identified by revising references included in selected articles.
RESULTS: 80 Articles were included in this systemic review. A bimodal relation between BP and glaucoma progression was found.
Both high and low BP increase the risk of glaucoma. Glaucoma progression was, possibly via ocular perfusion pressure variation,
strongly associated with nocturnal dipping and high variability in the BP over 24 h.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that systemic BP level associates with glaucomatous damage and provided recommenda-
tions for the management and study of arterial BP in glaucoma. Prospective clinical trials are needed to further support these
recommendations.
Keywords: 24-h ABPM; blood pressure; blood pressure variability; glaucoma; hypertension; nocturnal dipping.
Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of visual impairment rates of both glaucoma and high IOP are expected to co-occur
and blindness worldwide.1–3 The disease is characterized by more frequently as their rates keep rising parallel to the
structural and functional damage of the optic nerve head due increasing life expectancy.1,11 To date, IOP is the only modifiable
to progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells and their axons.4,5 risk factor and therapeutic option in glaucoma. Nevertheless,
High intraocular pressure (IOP) is a major risk factor for dis- some patients with normal or well-controlled IOP are still at
ease development and progression. Other risk factors include risk for glaucomatous damage. The vascular paradigm sug-
age, family history, ethnicity, diabetes, and myopia.1,6–10 The gests impaired systemic vascular function, thus compromising
blood supply to the optic nerve head, as a risk factor for disease intraarterial pressure, blood pressure*, hypertensi*, hypotensi*, Disease
progression. Management, Management*, Monitoring, therap*, treatment, adapt*,
The interplay between IOP, blood pressure (BP), and ocular per- change*, approach*, disease control*, risk*, progression*, visual field*.
fusion pressure (OPP) is poorly understood which limits the devel- Filters “English,” “2015–2022,” and “full article” were applied.
opment of a universal consensus around these parameters in the Animal studies were exclude using search blocks. The full search
management of glaucoma.1,9 The exact interaction between the strategy, as well those for the other databases, can be found
course of glaucoma and arterial BP is complex with studies sup- under Supplementary Data.
porting both arterial hypotension and hypertension as protective
and risk factors.1,4–6,8,11–14 The role of BP in relation to glaucoma
risk has been clarified by the use of 24-h ambulatory BP moni- RESULTS
toring. Nocturnal hypotension is considered a potential systemic Study selection
vascular risk factor for glaucoma. Moreover, abnormal circadian
The search of five electronic databases provided a total of 8,681
rhythms—such as an increased nighttime BP, an absence of noc-
citations. After deduplication, 6,581 references remained. Of these,
turnal BP dipping, or an excessive nocturnal BP dip—have been
6,276 were excluded based on title and 181 studies were excluded
associated with target-organ damage and increased cardiovas-
Type of study Study population Patients Eyes Men/women Country/ Age Hypertension Antihypertensives Conclusion Significance
Ethnicity level
Dielemans 1995 Single-center POAG and NTG 4,187 8,374 1,662/2,525 The 55–95 years n.s. 1,747 POAG was significantly P < 0.05
et al.33 prospective Netherlands associated with
cohort study SBP and arterial
hypertension, NTG
was not
Mitchell 2004 Population- Residents in an area 3,654 7,308 n.s. Australia 49–97 years 1,669 Included Systemic hypertensive P < 0.05
et al.39 based cohort West of Sydney subjects, especially
study those with
poorly controlled
hypertension, had
a higher risk of
glaucoma, independent
of other risk factors
Gangwani 2015 Prospective Patients treated 110 n.s. 64/46 China 65.1 ± 9.5 years All patients All patients NTG was the most P < 0.05
et al44. population- with systemic prevalent glaucoma
based study antihypertensives subtype. Higher SBP,
DBP and MAP were
associated with thinner
RNFL thickness.
MAP was positively
correlated with IOP
Actis 2016 Retrospective, POAG 190 377 76/114 Caucasian 61.49 ± 9.58 years n.s. n.s. Among other things n.s.
et al.31 observational systemic hypertension
study was statistically
significant associated
with worsening of
the MD variable
(P < 0.0001)
Feraru 2016 Retrospective POAG 69 69 16/53 Romania Mean 62.3 years 39 n.s. Arterial hypertension P < 0.05
et al.28 study was not significantly
associated with
glaucoma progression.
Progression rate was
only correlated with
the initial and final
MD level
Rim et al.41 2017 Retrospective Systemic 200,124 n.s. 129,577/ 70,547 Korean >40 years 100,062 100,062 Systemic hypertension P < 0.05
propensity- hypertensive (100,062 + was associated with an
score- patients on anti- 100,062) 1.16-fold increased risk
matched hypertensive for POAG development.
cohort study medication and Hypertensive patients
normotensive <65 years were more
controls susceptible to POAG
(HR = 1.17)
Kosior- 2017 Retrosprective NTG 215 280 64/151 Caucasian 70.5 ± 10 years 104 n.s. Systemic hypertension P < 0.05
Jarecka study was 2 times more
et al.45 frequently observed
in NTG patients with
arcuate scotoma
(P < 0.001)
The Relevance of Arterial Blood Pressure | 181
Chan 2017 Retrospective Rapidly and 534 (48 + 486) 540 227/313 Australia Rapid progressors: 339 n.s. Systemic hypertension P < 0.05
et al.27 case-control non-rapidly (54 + 486) 83 ± 9.83 years was not a statistically
study progressing Non-rapid significant risk factor
glaucoma progressors: for rapid progression
79 ± 10.63 years (P = 0.22)
182 | Van Eijgen et al.
Khatri 2018 Hospital-based, POAG 221 442 107/114 Nepal 54.4 ± 15.9 years 81 All patients with Patients with arterial P < 0.05
et al.43 cross- hypertension hypertension, diabetes
sectional mellitus or both have
descriptive significantly more
study severe POAG (based
on anatomical and
functional loss) and
could represent
“high-risk patients”
with POAG (OR 2,75,
P = 0.001)
Cantor 2018 Cross-sectional POAG and controls 1,272 (196 + 1,076) n.s. 443/829 Colombia ≥50 years All patients All patients High values of diastolic P < 0.05
et al.20 study (non-glaucoma) BP (>90 mm Hg) and
with treated low values of OPP
systemic (<40 mm Hg) and DPP
hypertension (≤50 mm Hg) were
associated with a ± two
times higher risk of
confirmed POAG. These
relationships were not
modified by the type
of AHT
Krishnan 2018 Descriptive NTG 41 81 15/26 India 51.75 ± 10.91 years 13 n.s. Arterial hypertension P < 0.05
et al.56 study is an important risk
factor for NTG. A
DPP <50 mm Hg was
statistically significant
inverse correlated with
the VFD
Hussain 2019 Hospital-based POAG cases and 100 n.s. n.s. Pakistan ≥50 years All patients All patients were DBP >90 mm Hg was P < 0.05
et al.8 cohort study suspects treated with associated with
AHT for at increased IOP and a
least 1 year 2.2 times higher risk to
before the have confirmed POAG
inclusion (P = 0.08). The type of
AHT did not modify
this relationship
Type of study Study population Patients Eyes Men/women Country/ Age Hypertension Antihypertensives Conclusion Significance
Ethnicity level
55
Gore et al. 2019 Hospital-based, OAG and controls 150 (75 + 75) 150 84/66 India 30–80 years n.s. Excluded Conventional defined P < 0.001
case control systemic hypertension
cross- and OAG were not
sectional associated. DPP <55
observation mm Hg and OPP
study <50 mm Hg are
significantly associated
with a 5–6 times
(respectively) increased
risk for POAG
Kuang 2020 Case-control POAG and controls 562,300 n.s. 296,145/ 266,155 Han-Chinese Average 59 years 296,975 296,975 POAG was, among other P ≤ 0.05
et al.36 study (112,929 + things, significantly
449,840) associated with prior
systemic hypertension
(P < 0.001)
Park et al.25 2020 Cross-sectional POAG and controls 103 and 58 179 and 92 41.8% and 40.2% South Corea 58.5 and 52.6 31.8% and n.s. In POAG participants with P = 0.003
retrospective 18.6% disc hemorrhage, high
study BP was associated with
reduction in macular
vessel density
Dascalu 2020 Prospective OAG 102 139 Romania 51 35 n.s. Glaucoma progression
et al.32 cohort study was associated with
systemic vascular
risk factors including
diastolic low BP,
ischemic cardiac
disease, peripheral
vasospasm, and
hypertension
Marshall 2021 Prospective, Early manifest 1,222 2,444 601/621 Australia 63.9 ± 11.1 years 467 Included Systemic hypertension P < 0.05
et al.38 longitudinal POAG and AHT were
study significantly associated
with both structural
(P = 0.006 and P = 0.010,
respectively) and
functional (P = 0.013
and P = 0.010)
progression
Ch’ng et 2021 Prospective POAG, NTG, and 164 164 43/17, 30/22, 63.0 ± 9.4, 44, 38, and 29 Included Moderate to severe P < 0.05
al.21 cohort study PCAG and 19/33 59.6 ± 10.3, and glaucomatous optic
62.3 ± 8.5 damage was associated
with lower systolic and
diastolic BP
Gillespie 2021 Clinical trail POAG 1,118 1,118 330/269 and 57.9 ± 0.9 and 37 486 Office hypertension P < 0.05
et al.35 registry 240/279 65.3 ± 9.3 significantly associates
with slope changes
in visual field defects,
with estimates ranging
from −0.33 dB/year to
−0.18 dB/year
The Relevance of Arterial Blood Pressure | 183
Abbreviations: OAG: open-angle glaucoma; POAG: primary open-angle glaucoma; NTG: normal-tension glaucoma; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure; RNFL: retinal
P < 0.05
P < 0.05
nerve fiber layer; IOP: intraocular pressure; MD: mean deviation; HR: hazard ratio; OPP: ocular perfusion pressure; DPP: diastolic perfusion pressure; AHT: antihypertensive treatment; VFD: visual field defect; n.s.: not
observed in NTG patients with arcuate scotomas. They hypothe-
level
n.s.
sized that the systemic vascular profile of the patient could pre-
dict the morphology of early scotoma in NTG.45
Mendelian randomization
hypertension (OR, 1.64;
relationship of BP on
IOP change or POAG
Patients with NTG had
VF progression rate
significantly higher
difference between
No significant OCT or
Circadian BP dysregulations
rates of systemic
support a causal
analysis did not
Nocturnal hypotension
prevalence
P = 0.004)
Conclusion
n.s.
n.s.
american)
or African
ancestry
European
(white,
of the optic nerve head and significant risk for glaucoma progres-
sion.54 Therefore, nighttime could be considered as a critical period
for glaucoma patients.8,14,19
159/118 in both
277
191
n.s.
70,832
119
visual field loss (mean deviation = −16.6 dB, IQR: −18.9 to −2.7 dB)
than patients with nocturnal over dipping and diurnal systemic
POAG and controls
NTG and healthy
longitudinal
Genome-wide
association
Retrospective
Type of study
study
study
2022
2022
Plotnikov
et al.34
et al.30
specified
Changet
Type of study Study Patients Eyes Men/ Country/ Age Systemic Conclusion Significance
population women Ethnicity AHT level
Topouzis 2013 Cross-sectional, POAG, PXG and 2,261 2261 1240/1021 Greece 70.8 ± 5.8 years Included Borderline significant association P < 0.05
et al.26 population- controls (94 + 41 + 2,126) between low DOPP and POAG
based study (P = 0.059)
Charlson 2014 Prospective, NTG 85 166 28/57 United Average 65 Included Cumulative nocturnal hypotension P ≤ 0.05
et al.53 longitudinal States years (>10 mm Hg under DMAP)
study predicts visual field loss (P < 0.02)
Pillunat 2015 Cross-sectional POAG and NTG 314 (147 + 167) 314 113/201 Caucasian >40 years Included Over-dippers with systemic P < 0.05
et al.47 study normotension (with or without
AHT) had more visual field loss
than over-dippers with systemic
hypertension (MD = −16.6 dB
vs. MD = −3.9 dB, respectively;
P < 0.004)
Bowe et al.6 2015 Systematic POAG and NTG n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 28–85 years n.s. Nocturnal systolic or diastolic BP P < 0.05
review and dips > 10% (no differentiation
meta-analysis between physiological- or
over-dipping) is a risk factor
for progressive visual field loss
in glaucoma (P < 0.001 and
P = 0.009, respectively; OR 3.32
and 2.09, respectively)
Lee et al.52 2015 Longitudinal, Untreated NTG 237 237 116/121 Korean 55.83 ± 9.33 Included Significantly higher daytime P < 0.05
retrospective, years or nighttime MAP and OPP
observational variabilities were found in over-
study dipper NTG patients compared
to non-dipper and dipper NTG
patients. Baseline increased
daytime MAP and OPP standard
deviation significantly predicted
future VFP in NTG
Chiotoroiu 2015 Prospective OAG 45 90 n.s. Romania n.s. n.s. The dipper group (dips >10%) n.s.
et al.51 observational presented the most important
and progression of glaucoma
interventional (objectified by visual field and
study OCT) compared to the non-
dipper (dips <10%) and arterial
hypertension group
Marjanovic 2015 Prospective, NTG and NTG 57 (37 + 20) 57 18/39 Serbia ≥50 years Included No statistically significant P < 0.05
et al.13 cross- suspects difference was found between
sectional and (all arterial NTG and NTG suspects in either
observational hypertension) DSBP or NSBP, nor in DDBP or
study NDBP. NTG patients had a lower
nocturnal systolic and diastolic
BP fall than NTG suspects
Marjanovic 2016 Prospective, POAG 114 114 78/36 Serbia ≥40 years Included There is a significant relationship P < 0.0055
et al.48 cross- between BP measurements
sectional and (DSBP, DMAP and NSBP) and
observational the RI in the OA in the dipper
study group. Retrobulbar blood flow
parameters (EDV) are reduced in
dippers (P < 0.001)
The Relevance of Arterial Blood Pressure | 185
Jin et al.49 2017 Retrospective POAG and NTG 106 (34 + 72) 106 56/50 Korean POAG: Excluded Nocturnal BP dip (systolic and/ P < 0.05
cohort study 59.14 ± 10.18 or diastolic) and paracentral
years NTG: scotoma are significantly
55.88 ± 11.23 correlated (occurrence/
years progression) in early NTG but
not significantly in early POAG.
186 | Van Eijgen et al.
Yoshikawa 2019 Observational, Glaucoma 817 (109 + 708) 817 391/426 Japan Glaucoma: Included
Significant association between P < 0.05
et al.2 cross- (POAG, PACG, 71 ± 11.2 glaucoma and increased NSBP
sectional SG and EG) Controls: (P = 0.001)and the non-dipper
study and healthy 70.8 ± 6.8 pattern of BP (P < 0.001),
controls years independent of known risk
factors
Karadag 2019 Observational POAG and PXG 18 (10 + 8) n.s. 10/8 Turkey POAG: Excluded In both groups, nighttime IOP was P < 0.05
et al.9 study 57.5 ± 8.5 significantly higher than the
years PXG: daytime values. Nighttime SBP
67.3 ± 6.2 and DBP were significantly lower
years than the daytime values
Baek et al.58 2020 Retrospective NTG 102 102 37/65 South 62.3 ± 14.1 n.s. Fluctuations of DBP in 24-h P < 0.05
cohort study Korea BP, diurnal IOP fluctuations
and ODH were significantly
associated with NTG progression
Yilmaz 2020 Retrospective POAG and 75 (35 + 40) n.s. 30/45 Turkey POAG: Included The NSBP, whole day SBP and P < 0.05
et al.4 case-control controls 65.03 ± 14.56 mean DBP were significantly
study years lower in patients with POAG.
Controls: Daytime, nighttime and whole
59.98 ± 14.40 day SBP were identified as
years independent risk factors for
developing POAG in the multiple
regression analysis. Hypotension
is more significant in the
etiopathogenesis of POAG
Lee et al.37 2020 Retrospective NTG 166 166 n.s. South 56.3 ± 15.3 Included Patients with a minimum SBP P < 0.05
cohort study Korea years ≤107 mm Hg showed more
peripapillary RNFL thinning
(P < 0.001) and patients with a
minimum DBP ≤63 mm Hg had
more progression of macular
GCIPL thinning (P < 0.001)
Leet et al. 60 2020 Retrospective NTG 110 220 48/62 South Average 56.75 Included Extreme dipping (dips >20%) and P < 0.05
study Korea years arterial hypertension were
independent predictors of
VFD (P = 0.048 and P = 0.045
respectively)
Shin et al.59 2021 Observational, NTG 88 88 35/53 South 56.0 ± 12.4 Included If choroidal microvascular drop-out P < 0.034
cross- Korea was present on angiography-
sectional OCT, the worse the glaucoma
study severity (OR 0.786) and the more
nighttime dips (OR 1.951)
Melgarejo 2021 Observational, NTG 93 93 12/81 South 61.9 ± 12.9 Included 24-h reading-to-reading mean P < 0.05
et al.64 cross- America arterial pressure (MAP) variability
sectional relates to glaucomatous optic
study neuropathy (OR, 1.93; 95% CI,
1.10-3.41) regardless the absolute
MAP level
The Relevance of Arterial Blood Pressure | 187
Significance
retrospective study from 2017 found that nocturnal dipping (aver-
age amount of nocturnal decrease of BP) and large variations in
systolic BP accorded to higher incidence of paracentral scotoma
P < 0.05
Abbreviations: OAG: open-angle glaucoma; POAG: primary open-angle glaucoma; NTG: normal-tension glaucoma; PACG: primary angle-closure glaucoma; SG: secondary glaucoma; EG: exfoliation glaucoma; PXG:
pressure; NSBP: nighttime systolic blood pressure; MD: mean deviation; RI: resistivity index; OA: ophthalmic artery; EDV: end diastolic velocity; ODH: optic disc haemorrhage; RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer; GCIPL:
pseudoexfoliation glaucoma; AHT: antihypertensive treatment; BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; DSBP: daytime systolic blood pressure; DMAP: daytime mean arterial
ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer; OCT: optical coherence tomography; MAP: mean arterial pressure; VFP: visual field progression; VFD: visual field defects; OPP: ocular perfusion pressure; DOPP: diastolic ocular
in early NTG patients.49 In their prospective case–control study,
level
Progression of functional
nocturnal hypotension
hemorrhages and fluctuations of diastolic BP and diurnal IOP on
one side, and a greater probability of NTG disease progression on
rates of RNFL loss
Included
Included
Systemic
68.5 ± 10.8
Europe
Ethnicity
Country/
Europe
United
and
South
perfusion pressure; IOP: intraocular pressure; n.s.: not specified; n.a.: not applicable
3,976
POAG, other
suspect,
Glaucoma
temic BP.
Compared to the cumulative evidence on nocturnal hypo-
tension, few studies have addressed the potential role of 24-h
retrospective
retrospective
2022 Observational,
2022 Observational,
2022 Observational,
longitudinal
longitudinal
sectional
study
study
study
Melgarejo
et al.66
et al.54
et al.65
is independent of the 24-h MAP average level.64 Even more, high established that systemic β-blockers, especially non-selective
24-h MAP variability related to higher glaucoma progression.65 types, have a lowering effect on IOP. However, in the Gütenberg
From a pathophysiological perspective, it is hypothesized that Health Study, Höhn et al. could not detect a significant trend of
drops in the BP due to high variability is what leads to impaired lower IOP (selective BB: −0.12 mm Hg; non-selective BB: −0.7 mm
OPP. Apart from nocturnal hypotension, the quantification of 24-h Hg) in non-glaucoma subjects. This finding was attributed to a
BP variability relies on indexes such as standard deviation, coef- long-term “drift” effect.74
ficient of variation, or variability independent of the mean. Each Regarding calcium channel blockers (CCB), mixed findings have
of these indexes gives an absolute number usually reported in also been reported. On one hand, it has been suggested that CCB
publications with the symbol “±.” This refers to how far apart data delay visual field deterioration (possibly due to a neuroprotective
points (e.g., BP recordings) are from the center of the distribu- effect).3,14,75 Hu et al.76 documented that nimodipine benefits patients
tion (e.g., 24-h BP average). The extrapolation of this definition to with NTG by increasing the macular capillary vessel density eval-
the pathophysiology of glaucoma suggests that the association uated on OCT-angiography. On the other hand, studies have found
between variability and glaucoma needs to be addressed. In this that CCB increase the risk of POAG after controlling for systemic
regard, the Leuven research group conducted a study to test the hypertension (OR 1.70 P = 0.03).34 Zheng et al. found that CCB, espe-
hypothesis that the association between high 24-h MAP variabil- cially amlodipine, were the most significant drug class to be asso-
Type of study Study population Patients Eyes Men/ women Country/ Age Antihypertensives Conclusion Significance
Ethnicity level
Topouzis 2006 Cross-sectional Non-glaucoma 232 232 138/94 Greece Mean 71 years Included but n.s. A DBP<90 mmHg resulting from AHT is P < 0.05
et al.68 population- population associated with increased optic disc
based cupping and decreased rim area.
epidemiologic
study
190 | Van Eijgen et al.
Suïc et al.57 2015 Prospective Glaucoma 64 n.s. 36/28 Croatia ♂: 65,32 years ♀: Included Statistically significant lower DBP in the P < 0.05
cohort study patients 62,45 years progressive group.
with treated
systemic
hypertension
Horwitz 2017 Registry Danish 41,235 n.a. n.s. Denmark 40-95 years Antiadrenergics Antihypertensive medication seems P < 0.05
et al.69 database glaucoma Diuretics to delay the onset of developing
study patients with Vasodilators glaucoma but does not necessarily
hypertension Beta blockers reduces the immediate risk. A greater
CCB A2RBs ACE protective effect was found depending
inhibitors on the cumulative number of different
antihypertensive drugs.
Höhn 2017 Population- Non-glaucoma 13,527 n.s. 6,849/ 6,678 Germany Mean 54,3 years Peripheral vasodilators Non-selective beta blockers showed a P < 0.0038
et al.74 based, population Diuretics Beta statistically non-significant trend
prospective, blockers CCB RAB of slightly lower IOP. All the other
observational ACE inhibitors ARB cardiovascular medication did not
cohort study Nitrates Other AHT show an association.
medication
Zheng 2018 Database study POAG and 36780 n.a. 17,847/ 3,166 United States Mean 72 years Beta blockers CCB (mainly Amlodipine) were associated P < 2.3 × 10−5
et al.42 controls (6,130 + CCB A2RB ACE with POAG requiring filtration surgery.
30,650) inhibitors Loop Beta blockers had a protective
diuretics association with POAG.
Siddiqui 2019 Retrospective, POAG 111 n.a. 48/63 Caucasian + Mean 70 years ACE inhibitors ARB There was no significant impact n.s.
et al.73 long-term, Hispanic + Beta blockers from systemic antihypertensive
case-control others Thiazides Loop medication on IOP reduction after
analysis diuretics CCB topical prostaglandin initiation.
Systemic antihypertensives use was
not correlated with nonresponse to
prostaglandin therapy.
Wang et al.77 2019 Cohort study OAG n.s. n.a. n.s. United States n.s. A2RB Thiazide There is more rapid progression to P < 0.05
diuretics CCB glaucoma filtration surgery in patients
taking CCB as compared with thiazides.
This relationship was not found for the
other drugs investigated.
Pappelis 2019 Retrospective POAG cases and 362 (250 + 112) 362 185/177 Caucasian Mean between Diuretics ARB ACE None of the systemic medications were P < 0.05
et al.70 cohort study suspects 55-62 years inhibitors CCB Beta associated with POAG VFP. A2RBs
blockers significantly delayed progression in
older patients. ACE inhibitors and A2RBs
were significantly associated with a
lower risk of POAG suspect conversion.
Chong 2020 Population- Data form the 4,699 n.s. 2292/2407 Multi-ethnic 58.8 ± 8.5 years ACE inhibitors A2RB The use of antihypertensive medication, P < 0.05
et al.67 based, cross- Singapore Asian CCB Diuretics Beta especially ACE inhibitors and
sectional Epidemiology blockers diuretics, were significantly associated
study Eye Diseases with thinner RNFL and GCIPL. A
Study greater number of antihypertensive
medications was also associated with
thinner RNFL and GCIPL.
angiotensin receptor blockers; A2RBs: angiotension II receptor blockers; ACE inhibitors: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; RAB: Renin-angiotensin blockers; VFP: visual field progression; n.a.: not applicable; n.s.:
P = 0.022
P ≤ 0.007
disrupts autoregulation mechanisms and increases susceptibility
P < 0.05
P ≤ 0.04 to glaucoma progression. Studies reporting nocturnal hypoten-
level
Abbreviations: OAG: open-angle glaucoma: POAG: primary open-angle glaucoma; AHT: antihypertensive treatment; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; IOP: intraocular pressure; CCB: calcium channel blockers; ARB:
sion and increased variability of BP and OPP as risk factors for
Nimodipine increased superficial macular
latory dysfunction.14
Some glaucoma patients also present with features of a more
generalized vascular dysfunction. Lindemann et al.79 found a
higher occurrence of impaired autonomic cardiovascular dysreg-
Conclusion
ulation in NTG. The Lifelines Cohort Study found that low heart
blockers
blockers
blockers
and 80+
53.7 years
64.5 (IQR,
United States
DISCUSSION
17:3
n.s.
20
Duke Glaucoma
suspected
glaucoma
OAG
cohort study
case-control
longitudinal
longitudinal
Retrospective,
Retrospective,
Retrospective
Type of study
cohort
2022
2022
2022
Lee et al.71
Hu et al.76
Type of study Type of Patients Eyes Men/ Country/ Age Systemic Conclusion Significance
glaucoma/ women Ethnicity AHT level
population
Modrzejewska 2015 Case-control POAG and 110 (56 + 54) 110 n.s. Poland Mean 68 years Excluded POAG was associated with P ≤ 0.05
et al.80 study controls significantly higher arterial BP,
increased resistance indices
and significantly lower OPP,
192 | Van Eijgen et al.
Abbreviations: NTG: normal-tension glaucoma; POAG: primary open-angle glaucoma; BP: blood pressure; OPP: ocular perfusion pressure; DOPP: diastolic ocular perfusion pressure; ONH: optic nerve head; VFP: visual
field progression; HRV: heart rate variability; n.a.: not applicable; n.s.: not specified
and the time of antihypertensive drug intake could increase the Regarding ACE inhibitors, only two studies provided evidence
effect of nocturnal dipping depending on the patients susceptibil- against its use. Chong et al.67 found that ACE inhibitors (and diu-
ity.86 If nocturnal hypotension is detected, change in pharmaco- retics) were associated with more RNFL and GCL thinning after
logical treatment might be considered. Although morning intake adjustment of covariates. Langman et al.100 report higher inci-
would theoretically reduce the risk of nocturnal dipping, the dence of POAG in this group both in current as past intake, which
Hygia and MAPEC trials point to a more pronounced reduction brings the authors to point towards uncontrolled hypertension
of cardiovascular mortality associated with nighttime dosing.4,73,87 rather than the class of medication as culprit.
The clinical implementation of the findings of the SPRINT Taken together the authors speculate that as first line treat-
trial, STEP trial and the most recent guidelines concerning the ment for hypertension in glaucoma patients thiazides and/or to a
treatment of systemic hypertension may have a key role in lesser extent ACE inhibitors or β-blockers, depending on concom-
the management of glaucoma the coming years.11,88,89 The trial itant comorbidities as heart failure, lung or kidney disease, could
demonstrated that treating arterial hypertension to a target of be considered (rather than CCBs). However, validation studies are
less than 120 mm Hg reduced cardiovascular events and the needed to support such clinical recommendations.
overall risk of death in all hypertensive patients.88 Following Ophthalmologists do not commonly treat hypertension and pro-
those findings, the 2017 ACA/AHA hypertension guidelines fessionals who do, haven’t established preferred practice patterns
- In case of nocturnal (over-)dippers, morning dosing of anti- reports financial support for clinical trials from Aerie during
hypertensive medication could be considered (taking into the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees from
account the pros and cons as discussed above). Omikron, Santen and Thea, personal fees from Allergan/AbbVie,
- Up till now there is insufficient evidence to justify decrease Elios Vision, EyeD, Horus, Omikron, Santen, Théa, and personal
of antihypertensive medication in case of merely nocturnal fees and intellectual property from Mona outside the submitted
over-dipping. work.
- Currently available evidence suggests that CCB may not be
recommended as first line treatment in patients with both
glaucoma and arterial hypertension. Instead, thiazides
REFERENCES
and/or to a lesser extent ACE inhibitors might be more
suitable. β-blockers might also be potentially beneficial in 1. Leeman M, Kestelyn P. Glaucoma and blood pressure.
glaucoma. However, additional evidence is needed to sup- Hypertension 2019; 73:944–950.
port such clinical recommendations. 2. Yoshikawa T, Obayashi K, Miyata K, Saeki K, Ogata N.
Increased nighttime blood pressure in patients with glaucoma
cross-sectional analysis of the LIGHT Study. Ophthalmology 2019;
Research recommendations 126:1366–1371.
- Future research might benefit from BP data being presented 3. Wu AN, Khawaja AP, Pasquale LR, Stein JD. A review of systemic
continuously, and when categorized, being presented by medications that may modulate the risk of glaucoma. Eye 2020;
different cut-off values to enable comparison.108 34:12–28.
- Future research should correct for covariates, including the 4. Yilmaz KC, Gungor SS, Ciftci O, Akman A, Muderrisoglu H.
presence of hypertension, when comparing different types Relationship between primary open angle glaucoma and blood
of antihypertensive medication. pressure. Acta Cardiol 2020; 75:54–58.
5. Raman P, Suliman NB, Zahari M, Kook M, Ramli N. Low noctur-
nal diastolic ocular perfusion pressure as a risk factor for NTG
Supplementary Data progression: a 5-year prospective study. Eye (London, England)
Supplementary materials are available at American Journal of 2018; 32:1183–1189.
Hypertension (http://ajh.oxfordjournals.org). 6. Bowe A, Grünig M, Schubert J, Demir M, Hoffmann V, Kütting F,
Pelc A, Steffen HM. Circadian variation in arterial blood pres-
sure and glaucomatous optic neuropathy—a systematic review
Acknowledgments and meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2015; 28:1077–1082.
Jan Van Eijgen received a PhD fellowship fundamental research 7. Grzybowski A, Och M, Kanclerz P, Leffler C, De Moraes CG.
from the Research Fund Flanders (11B1321N). Primary open angle glaucoma and vascular risk factors: a
review of population based studies from 1990 to 2019. J Clin Med
2020; 9:761.
Conflict of Interest 8. Hussain SD, Quratulain, Afzal R. ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS OF
None regarding to this publication. The authors report no con- BLOOD PRESSURE IN IOP IN PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA.
flict of interest regarding the submitted work. Ingeborg Stalmans Indo Am J Pharm Sci 2019; 6:4834–4837.
The Relevance of Arterial Blood Pressure | 195
9. Karadag R, Koyun E, Ozsoy I, Caliskan M. Evaluation of the of open-angle glaucoma with perfusion pressure status in the
24-hour intraocular pressure and systemic blood pressure at Thessaloniki Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 155:843–851.
the same time. J Fr Ophtalmol 2019; 42:739–745. 27. Chan TCW, Bala C, Siu A, Wan F, White A. Risk factors for
10. Holappa M, Vapaatalo H, Vaajanen A. Many faces of rapid glaucoma disease progression. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;
renin-angiotensin system—focus on eye. Open Ophthalmol J
180:151–157.
2017; 11:122–142. 28. Feraru C, Chiselita D, Pantalon A. Long-term progression and
11. De Moraes CG, Cioffi GA, Weinreb RN, Liebmann JM. New rec- risk factors in primary open-angle glaucoma in clinical care.
ommendations for the treatment of systemic hypertension Spektrum Der Augenheilkunde 2016; 30:181–189.
and their potential implications for glaucoma management. J 29. Chang AY, Tsamis E, Blumberg DM, Al-Aswad LA, Cioffi GA,
Glaucoma 2018; 27:567–571. Hood DC, Liebmann JM, De Moraes CG. The role of intraocular
12. Kwon J, Jo YH, Jeong D, Shon K, Kook MS. Baseline systolic ver- pressure and systemic hypertension in the progression of glau-
sus diastolic blood pressure dip and subsequent visual field comatous damage to the macula. J Glaucoma 2022; 31:317–321.
progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2019; 30. Plotnikov D, Huang Y, Khawaja AP, Foster PJ, Zhu Z, Guggenheim
126:967–979. JA, He M. High blood pressure and intraocular pressure: a
13. Marjanovic I, Marjanovic M, Stojanov V, Hentova-Sencanic P, Mendelian randomization study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2022;
or uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 59. Shin JW, Jo YH, Song MK, Won HJ, Kook MS. Nocturnal blood
2018; 125:984–993. pressure dip and parapapillary choroidal microvasculature
43. Khatri A, Shrestha JK, Thapa M, Khatri BK, Kharel M. Severity dropout in normal-tension glaucoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:206.
of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with hypertension 60. Lee K, Yang H, Kim JY, Seong GJ, Kim CY, Bae HW. Risk factors
and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2018; 11:209–215. associated with structural progression in normal-tension glau-
44. Gangwani RA, Lee JW, Mo HY, Sum R, Kwong AS, Wang JH, coma: intraocular pressure, systemic blood pressure, and myo-
Tsui WW, Chan JC, Lai JS. The correlation of retinal nerve fiber pia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020; 61:35.
layer thickness with blood pressure in a Chinese Hypertensive 61. Mena LJ, Felix VG, Melgarejo JD, Maestre GE. 24-Hour blood pres-
Population. Medicine (Baltim) 2015; 94:e947. sure variability assessed by average real variability: a system-
45. Kosior-Jarecka E, Wrobel-Dudzinska D, Lukasik U, Zarnowski atic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6:e006895.
T. Ocular and systemic risk factors of different morpholo- 62. Bill A. Glaucoma: conceptions of a disease: pathogenesis, diag-
gies of scotoma in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. J nosis, therapy. In Heilmann K, Richardson KT (eds), Physiological
Ophthalmol 2017; 2017:1480746. Aspects of the Circulation in the Optic Nerve. Saunders: Philadelphia,
46. O’Brien E, Sheridan J, O’Malley K. Dippers and non-dippers. 1978, pp. 97–103.
Lancet 1988; 2:397. 63. Plange N, Kaup M, Daneljan L, Predel HG, Remky A, Arend O.
73. Siddiqui M, Iltis J, Yanev P, Sladic J, Huynh C, Nolan D, Singer Kimmel PL, Johnson KC, Goff DC Jr, Fine LJ, Cutler JA, Cushman
M. Effect of systemic antihypertensives on change in intraocu- WC, Cheung AK, Ambrosius WT; SPRINT Research Group. A ran-
lar pressure after initiating topical prostaglandins for primary domized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure con-
open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, N.Z.) 2019; trol. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:2103–2116.
13:207–213. 89. Zhang W, Zhang S, Deng Y, Wu S, Ren J, Sun G, Yang J, Jiang Y, Xu
74. Hohn R, Mirshahi A, Nickels S, Schulz A, Wild PS, Blettner M, X, Wang TD, Chen Y, Li Y, Yao L, Li D, Wang L, Shen X, Yin X, Liu W,
Pfeiffer N. Cardiovascular medication and intraocular pressure: Zhou X, Zhu B, Guo Z, Liu H, Chen X, Feng Y, Tian G, Gao X, Kario
results from the Gutenberg Health Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; K, Cai J; STEP Study Group. Trial of intensive blood-pressure
101:1633–1637. control in older patients with hypertension. N Engl J Med 2021;
75. Anton-Lopez A, Moreno-Montanes J, Duch-Tuesta S, Corsino 385:1268–1279.
Fernandez-Vila P, Garcia-Feijoo J, Milla-Grino E, Munoz-Negrete 90. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ,
FJ, Pablo-Julvez L, Rodriguez-Agirretxe I, Urcelay-Segura JL, Himmelfarb CD, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones
Ussa-Herrera F, Villegas-Perez MP; y Grupo Español de Estilos de DW, MacLaughlin EJ, Muntner P, Ovbiagele B, Smith SC, Spencer
Vida y Glaucoma. Lifestyles guide and glaucoma (II) diet, sup- CC, Stafford RS, Taler SJ, Thomas RJ, Williams KA, Williamson
plements, drugs, sleep, pregnancy, and systemic hypertension. JD, Wright JT. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/
102. Mancia G, Kreutz R, Brunström M, Burnier M, Grassi G, medication and intraocular pressure in a British population: the
Januszewicz A, Muiesan ML, Tsioufis K, Agabiti-Rosei E, EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2014; 121:1501–1507.
Algharably EAE, Azizi M, Benetos A, Borghi C, Hitij JB, 104. Ho H, Shi Y, Chua J, Tham YC, Lim SH, Aung T, Wong TY, Cheng CY.
Cifkova R, Coca A, Cornelissen V, Cruickshank JK, Cunha PG, Association of systemic medication use with intraocular pressure
Danser AHJ, Pinho RM, Delles C, Dominiczak AF, Dorobantu in a multiethnic Asian Population: The Singapore Epidemiology
M, Doumas M, Fernández-Alfonso MS, Halimi JM, Járai Z, of Eye Diseases Study. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017; 135:196–202.
Jelaković B, Jordan J, Kuznetsova T, Laurent S, Lovic D, Lurbe 105. Wright JM, Musini VM, Gill R. First-line drugs for hypertension.
E, Mahfoud F, Manolis A, Miglinas M, Narkiewicz K, Niiranen Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 4:CD001841.
T, Palatini P, Parati G, Pathak A, Persu A, Polonia J, Redon J, 106. Chen YJ, Li LJ, Tang WL, Song JY, Qiu R, Li Q, Xue H, Wright JM.
Sarafidis P, Schmieder R, Spronck B, Stabouli S, Stergiou G, First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus
Taddei S, Thomopoulos C, Tomaszewski M, Van de Borne P, other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.
Wanner C, Weber T, Williams B, Zhang ZY, Kjeldsen SE. 2023 Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 2018:Cd008170.
ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hyperten- 107. Wiysonge CS, Bradley HA, Volmink J, Mayosi BM, Opie LH. Beta-
sion The Task Force for the management of arterial hyper- blockers for hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;
tension of the European Society of Hypertension: endorsed 1:CD002003.