HLST 320 Teaching and Learning for Health Professionals
Assignment 1: Teaching Philosophy Criteria and Marking Record
Student: Veronica Okpomor
Date Received:
Marked by:
Assignment Criteria Instructor/Self Evaluation (Highlight level achieved)
Assignment Content worth 70% of total grade.
Professional Teaching Philosophy
• Clear description of your professional • Teaching philosophy described
teaching philosophy to a(n)
• Integration of your personal values and insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/very
beliefs into your teaching philosophy good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
• Values and beliefs have been integrated to a(n)
insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/ good/very
good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
Contemporary Teaching Theory • Teaching theory/theorist/model is/is not clearly
identified
• At least one client-centred teaching • Clear rationale for theory/theorist/model included
theory/theorist/model is clearly identified to a(n) insufficient/unsatisfactory/ satisfactory/
• Clear rationale for theory/theorist/model good/very good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
included • The analysis is supported by evidence to a(n)
• Analysis is supported by relevant scholarly insufficient/ unsatisfactory/satisfactory/
evidence good/very good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
Ethical Principles
• Integration of at least two professional • Professional ethical principles integrated to a(n)
ethical principles insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/ good/very
• Include a clear and concise rationale for good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
the ethical principles • Rationale for ethical principles is completed to
• Analysis is supported by relevant scholarly a(n) insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/
evidence good/very good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
• Explanation and rationale supported by relevant
evidence to a(n) insufficient/unsatisfactory/
satisfactory/good/very good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
Critical Thinking
• Ability to analyze, evaluate, create, and • The ability to analyze, evaluate, create, and
engage in critical inquiry is evident engage in critical inquiry is performed to a(n)
throughout insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/ good/
• All elements of the assignment very good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
criteria/guidelines are addressed • All elements of the assignment guidelines are
addressed to a(n)
insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/very Formatted: Highlight
good/excellent level
Assignment format worth 30% of total grade.
PowerPoint Format
• Adheres/does not adhere to slide limit Formatted: Highlight
• 8–10 slides in length (excluding reference • Information is never/sometimes/always clear and Formatted: Highlight
list) consistent across slides
• Information on slides is clear and • Graphic elements are never/sometimes/always Formatted: Highlight
consistent included
• Graphic elements are included • Discussion and explanations for each slide were
appropriately included to a(n) insufficient/unsatisfactory/
• Use of speaker notes and/or voice over satisfactory/good/very good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
PowerPoint to provide discussion and
detail.
Structure
• The details regarding the topic and context were
included as an introduction to a(n)
• Introduction insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/very
Ability to include topic and context for good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
presentation that engages the audience • The subtopics were presented logically and
• Organization sequentially throughout none/few/some/much/
most/all of the assignment Formatted: Highlight
Subtopics are presented in a logical and • The main ideas were summarized, and reflections
sequential manner were presented in the conclusion to a(n)
insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/ veryFormatted: Highlight
• Conclusion good/excellent level
Ability to summarize main ideas and
include thoughtful reflections
Writing Style and Structure
• Accurate spelling • Spelling accuracy insufficient/unsatisfactory/
• Professional tone satisfactory/good/very good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
• Sentence structure, punctuation, and • Professional tone used to a(n)
grammar insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/very Formatted: Highlight
good/excellent level
• Sentence structure, punctuation, and grammar
completed to a(n)
insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/very Formatted: Highlight
good/excellent level
Use of Evidence
• References evaluated and appropriate for the
• References are evaluated and appropriate assignment to a(n) insufficient/unsatisfactory/
for the assignment. satisfactory/good/very good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
• References are published within the last • References published within last 10 years, (except
10 years, except for those that are for those that are foundational) to a(n)
foundational/classic publications insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/very Formatted: Highlight
• Minimum of 4 scholarly references good/excellent level
• At least one scholarly article external to • Minimum of 4 scholarly references included/not Formatted: Highlight
the course readings/references located included
through scholarly literature search • At least one scholarly reference external to course
• Evidence is consistently and accurately readings included/not included Formatted: Highlight
integrated throughout the PowerPoint • Evidence is consistently and accurately integrated
throughout the PowerPoint to a(n)
insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/very
good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
Adheres to Current APA
• Elements of current APA edition have
been met
• In-text citation (if applicable, in • APA current edition format for in-text citation
introduction and conclusion) used to a(n)
• Include a reference list at the end of the insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/very
presentation. The reference list is not good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
counted towards the number of slides • APA current edition format for reference page
allowed was used to a(n)
insufficient/unsatisfactory/satisfactory/good/very
good/excellent level Formatted: Highlight
Complete a Self-Evaluation using this tool to rate
your performance for each criterion.
• Highlight the level you achieved for the • Self-evaluation was completed/not completed Formatted: Highlight
descriptors above
• Include this self-evaluation document in
your assignment submission in the drop
box
Grade /100 If you have any questions or need further clarification,
please contact your tutor directly via course mail or
telephone.
