Legal Reasoning for CLAT 2025: How to solve

legal reasoning questions, best resources, Tips

& Tricks
Anupama Mehra
Assist ant Manager – Cont ent
Updated on Nov 11, 2024 17:12 IST
CLAT Legal Reasoning Section is a critical component of CLAT Exam.
Read further to know about CLAT legal reasoning strategies, how to solve
CLAT legal reasoning questions, best resources for CLAT legal reasoning
and other important details.

Legal Reasoning f or CLAT

The Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) is a highly competitive exam

f or admission to National Law Universities (NLUs) and other esteemed
institutions across India. Among its various sections, the Legal
Reasoning section is particularly crucial as it assesses a candidate’s

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
ability to apply legal principles to given scenarios.

Also Read: Idioms and Proverbs f or CLAT 2025 With Meaning

This section not only tests one's knowledge of the law but also their
logical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Theref ore, mastering this
section is essential f or aspiring law students. This comprehensive guide
will explore strategies, techniques, and resources to help candidates
conquer the Legal Reasoning section in CLAT 2025. Conquering the
Legal Reasoning section in CLAT requires strong reading skills, a solid
understanding of legal principles, legal maxims and consistent
practice.Regular practice, staying updated on legal developments, and
thorough revision are essential components of ef f ective preparation f or
the CLAT Legal Reasoning section. By adhering to a comprehensive
preparation strategy, candidates can develop the skills necessary to
excel in the Legal Reasoning section and secure admission to their
desired law school.
Also Read: How to Score 25+ in CLAT Legal Reasoning? Tips to prepare
f or CLAT 2025
By f ollowing the strategies outlined in this article and utilising the best
resources available, candidates can enhance their preparation and
improve their chances of excelling in the exam. CLAT Exam 2025 is
scheduled to be held on December 1, 2024.

Understanding the Legal Reasoning Section

The Legal Reasoning section aims to evaluate your understanding and
application of legal principles. It typically includes passages that describe
a legal scenario, f ollowed by questions that require you to apply relevant
legal principles to these scenarios. The questions are designed to test
your ability to interpret laws and apply them to the f acts presented, which
is a crucial skill f or any law prof essional. To excel in this section, it is

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
imperative to have a f irm grasp of basic legal concepts, strong reading
skills, and the ability to think logically and analytically.

CLAT Legal Reasoning Strategies

To excel in the Legal Reasoning section, it is essential to develop a
strategy that enhances your comprehension and application skills. First
and f oremost, f amiliarise yourself with basic legal principles.
Understanding f undamental concepts of Contract Law, Criminal Law,
Constitutional Law, Torts, and Family Law is critical.
For instance, knowing what constitutes an of f er, acceptance, and
consideration in Contract Law, or understanding mens rea and actus
reus in Criminal Law, will provide a solid f oundation. Standard textbooks,
online courses, and legal blogs are excellent resources f or building this
f oundational knowledge. Improving reading comprehension is another
vital aspect. Since the questions are based on passages, being able to
quickly and accurately comprehend complex texts is crucial. Regular
practice with reading legal materials, newspapers, and comprehension
exercises will help enhance your reading speed and accuracy.
Summarising paragraphs and identif ying key points can also improve
comprehension skills.
Applying legal principles to various f act scenarios is essential f or
mastering this section. Practicing with past CLAT papers, mock tests,
and case studies will help you understand how principles operate in
dif f erent contexts. This practice will also enable you to recognise
patterns in questions and develop strategies f or answering them
ef f ectively. Staying updated on legal developments is crucial as well.
Reading legal news, f ollowing judgments, and staying engaged with
current legal issues will enhance your understanding of contemporary
legal principles and their applications. Legal news websites, legal
magazines, and law review articles are excellent sources f or staying

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
inf ormed.

Best Resources for CLAT Legal Reasoning

Candidates can f ollow the strategies and study materials f or CLAT
Legal Aptitude Section mentioned below to score well in CLAT Legal
Reasoning section:

1. Grasp Basic Legal Principles

Understanding Fundamental Concepts:
- Contract Law: Learn about of f er, acceptance, consideration, breach of
contract, and remedies.

- Criminal Law: Understand principles like mens rea, actus reus, and
various types of crimes.
- Constitutional Law: Familiarise yourself with f undamental rights,
directive principles, and the structure of government.
- Torts: Study negligence, def amation, nuisance, and vicarious liability.
- Family Law: Know about marriage, divorce, and inheritance laws.
Resources:

- Standard textbooks on these subjects.

- Online courses and video lectures.
- Legal blogs and articles.
2. Develop Strong Reading Skills

Improving Reading Comprehension:

- Practice reading complex texts regularly. Legal reasoning passages
require caref ul reading to identif y key f acts and relevant legal principles.
- Focus on improving your speed and accuracy in reading lengthy and

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
complex texts.

- Summarise paragraphs to ensure you understand the main points.

Resources:
- Reading comprehension books.
- Online reading practice tools.

- Newspapers and legal magazines.

3. Practice Application of Principles
Applying Legal Principles:
- Work on applying legal principles to dif f erent f act scenarios. This will
help you understand how principles operate in various contexts.
- Use past CLAT papers and mock tests to get a f eel f or the type of
questions asked.
- Practice various case studies to enhance your application skills.
Resources:
- Case law books.
- Mock test series.
- Online practice platf orms.
4. Stay Updated on Legal Developments
Keeping Up with Legal News:

- Read legal news and articles to stay updated on recent legal

developments. This will help in understanding contemporary legal issues
which might be tested.
- Follow judgments and legal opinions f rom reputed sources.

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
- Join legal discussion f orums and groups to stay engaged with current
events.
Resources:
- Legal news websites

- Legal magazines and journals.

- Law review articles.

How to Solve CLAT Legal Reasoning Questions?

To solve CLAT Legal Reasoning questions ef f ectively, it is important to
adopt a systematic approach. Begin by thoroughly reading the passage to
grasp the context and pinpoint the main issue or problem. Note any legal
principles or rules mentioned in the passage. Focus on the f acts that are
crucial f or applying the legal principle, and ignore extraneous inf ormation.
Next, apply the legal principle logically to the given f acts. Ensure that your
reasoning f ollows a clear and logical path. When presented with multiple-
choice questions, eliminate options that do not apply the principle
correctly or misinterpret the f acts. Narrow down your choices to the most
logically sound option.
It is also essential to double-check your answer. Revisit the passage and
question to ensure your chosen answer is consistent with the given
inf ormation and that no important detail has been overlooked. Common
pitf alls include misinterpreting the principle, overlooking key f acts, and
conf using similar principles. Taking your time to read and understand the
passage and the question bef ore answering can help avoid these errors.

Step-by-step approach to solve CLAT Legal Reasoning Questions in

CLAT Exam:
1. Read the Passage Caref ully:

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
 - Understand the context and identif y the main issue or problem.

- Note any legal principles or rules mentioned in the passage.

2. Identif y Relevant Facts:
- Focus on the f acts that are crucial f or applying the legal principle.
- Ignore extraneous inf ormation that doesn't impact the legal reasoning.
3. Apply the Legal Principle:
- Apply the principle logically to the given f acts.
- Ensure that your reasoning f ollows a clear and logical path.
4. Eliminate Incorrect Options:
- Rule out options that do not apply the principle correctly or
misinterpret the f acts.
- Narrow down your choices to the most logically sound option.
5. Double-Check Your Answer:

- Revisit the passage and question to ensure your chosen answer is

consistent with the given inf ormation.
- Verif y that no important detail has been overlooked.

Best books for CLAT Legal Reasoning Section

Preparing f or the CLAT legal reasoning section requires the right
resources to understand and master the concepts, question types, and
strategies. Here is a list of some of the best books to prepare f or the
CLAT legal reasoning section:
1. Universal's Guide to CLAT & LLB Entrance Examination by Manish
Arora
This book provides comprehensive coverage of legal reasoning along

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
with practice questions and detailed explanations.
2. Legal Aptitude f or the CLAT and Other Law Entrance Examinations: A
Workbook by A.P. Bhardwaj
This workbook is designed specif ically f or legal reasoning, of f ering a
variety of exercises and mock tests to hone your skills.
3. CLAT Solved and Practice Papers by Anupama Chakraborty
This book includes solved papers f rom previous CLAT exams and
practice papers that mimic the pattern and dif f iculty level of the actual
test.
4. Legal Awareness and Legal Reasoning f or the CLAT and LLB
Entrance Examinations by A.P. Bhardwaj
It provides an in-depth understanding of legal principles and includes
numerous practice questions to test your knowledge.
5. Legal Aptitude (CLAT) by RK Gupta
A comprehensive book covering the legal reasoning section with plenty of
examples and practice questions to aid in understanding the concepts.
6. Word Power Made Easy by Norman Lewis
While not specif ically f ocused on legal reasoning, building a strong
vocabulary is crucial f or understanding and interpreting legal texts. This
book ef f ectively helps enhance your vocabulary.
7. Critical Thinking by M. Neil Browne and Stuart M. Keeley
This book aids in developing critical thinking skills, which are essential f or
analyzing and solving legal reasoning questions.

8. A Modern Approach to Logical Reasoning by R.S. Aggarwal

It carries all important aspects of logical reasoning, which is closely

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
related to legal reasoning. It includes numerous practice questions and
explanations.
9. Legal Aptitude f or the CLAT and Other Law Entrance Examinations by
Bharadwaj
The book f ocuses on legal aptitude and reasoning and of f ers a detailed
explanation of concepts and a plethora of practice questions.
10. Legal Aptitude and Legal Reasoning f or the CLAT and LLB Entrance
Examinations by Bhardwaj
A f ocused book that provides extensive practice in legal reasoning with
an emphasis on understanding legal principles and applying them to
various scenarios.
Also Read: Synonyms & Antonyms f or Law Entrance 2025: List of Most
Commonly Asked Words
Practicing with previous year CLAT papers and mock tests is crucial f or
understanding the CLAT exam pattern and dif f iculty level. Analysing past
papers helps in identif ying common question types and areas that require
more f ocus. Solving mock test series f rom shiksha can simulate exam
conditions and improve time management skills.

Staying updated on legal news and articles is also benef icial. Reading
legal journals like the Harvard Law Review, Indian Law Review, and legal
sections in major newspapers can enhance your knowledge and keep you
inf ormed about current legal issues.

How to prepare for CLAT 2025 Legal Reasoning

Section – Tips & Tricks
Candidates can f ollow the given tips and tricks to excel in CLAT Exam
2025:
Time Management: Practice managing your time ef f ectively during the

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
 exam. Allocate a specif ic amount of time f or each passage and
question. Use a timer during practice sessions to simulate exam
conditions.

Regular Practice: Consistency is key. Regular practice with a variety

of questions and passages will build conf idence and prof iciency. Set
aside dedicated time each day f or legal reasoning practice.

Analyse Your Mistakes: Af ter practicing, review your mistakes to

understand where you went wrong and how to avoid similar errors in
the f uture. Keep a log of common mistakes and revisit them regularly.
Stay Calm and Focused: During the exam, stay calm and f ocused.
Caref ully read each passage and question, and avoid rushing through
the answers. Practice relaxation techniques to manage exam stress.

CLAT Legal Reasoning Question

Candidates can check here Legal Reasoning questions as asked in
CLAT past year papers:

Passage 1
The Indian legal system places a signif icant emphasis on protecting the
rights and welf are of children. The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection
of Children) Act, 2015, is a vital piece of legislation in this regard. It is
designed to ensure that children in conf lict with the law receive special
care, protection, and treatment, with the ultimate goal of their
rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

One of the key provisions of the Act is the establishment of Juvenile

Justice boards (JJbs) at the district level. these boards consist of a
metropolitan magistrate or Judicial magistrate of the f irst class and two
social workers, at least one of whom should be a woman. The primary
f unction of the JJb is to determine the age of the juvenile, the
circumstances in which the of f ense was committed, and whether the

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
juvenile should be sent to a special home or released on probation.

The Act makes a clear distinction between a “child in conf lict with the
law” and a “child in need of care and protection.” A child in conf lict with
the law is one who has committed an of f ense, while a child in need of
care and protection is a child who is vulnerable or at risk and requires
special care and support.

The Act introduces a unique approach to dealing with children who are in
conf lict with the law. For children between the ages of 16 and 18, who
have committed heinous of f enses, they can be tried as adults, subject to
a preliminary assessment by the Juvenile Justice board. this assessment
considers the child’s mental and physical capacity to commit such an
of f ense.
If the board determines that the child should be tried as an adult, the case
is transf erred to the regular criminal courts. the Act also places
restrictions on the publication of inf ormation that could lead to the
identif ication of a juvenile of f ender. This is done to protect the privacy
and f uture prospects of the child.
What is the primary objective of the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection of Children) Act, 2015?

(A) to punish child of f enders.

(B) To rehabilitate and reintegrate children in conf lict with the law.

(C) to remove all f orms of violence against children.

(d) to increase the age of criminal responsibility.

Who makes up the Juvenile Justice board (JJb)?

(A) two Judges.

(b) A metropolitan magistrate and two Lawyers.

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
(C) A Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the f irst class and
two Social Workers.

(D) Three Police Of f icers

What is the role of the Juvenile Justice board (JJb)?

(A) to determine the punishment f or juvenile of f enders.

(b) to decide whether a child should be sent to a regular prison.

(C) to assess the age and circumstances of the juvenile, and make
decisions on rehabilitation.

(d) to prosecute child of f enders.

What is the distinction between a ‘‘child in conf lict with the law’’ and
a ‘‘child in need of care and protection’’ ?

(A) there is no distinction; both terms mean the same thing.

(B) A ‘‘child in conf lict with the law’’ has committed a crime, while a ‘‘child
in need of care and protection’’ is vulnerable or at risk.

(C) A ‘‘child in need of care and protection’’ is more likely to commit

crimes.

(D) A ‘‘child in conf lict with the law’’ is an adolescent of f ender.

Under what circumstances can children between the ages of 16 and

18 be tried as adults?

(A) they can always be tried as adults.

(b) Af ter a preliminary assessment by the Juvenile Justice board.

(c) When they have committed any of f ense, regardless of the severity.

(d) When they reach the age of 18.

What is the purpose of placing restrictions on the publication of

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
inf ormation related to juvenile of f enders?

(A) to increase the age of criminal responsibility.

(b) to protect the privacy and f uture prospects of the child.

(C) to encourage public shaming of juvenile of f enders.

(d) to help law enf orcement track juvenile of f enders.

Paragraph 2

In India, the legal landscape surrounding online def amation is a subject of

signif icant interest and debate. With the rise of social media, and online
platf orms, cases of online def amation have become increasingly
common. def amation ref ers to making f alse statements about someone
that harm their reputation.

Online def amation includes def amatory statements made on the internet,
including social media, blogs, f orums, and other online platf orms. One
critical aspect of online def amation is determining the liability of
intermediaries, such as social media platf orms or websites, f or
def amatory content posted by users. Section 79 of the inf ormation
technology Act, 2000, provides a saf e harbor f or intermediaries, stating
that they are not liable f or third-party content if they act as intermediaries
and f ollow due diligence in removing or disabling access to the content
once notif ied.
However, determining whether an intermediary has f ulf illed its due
diligence obligations can be complex. the indian judiciary has been
actively interpreting this provision. One signif icant case is the Shreya
Singhal v. Union of India, in which the Supreme Court clarif ied that
intermediaries are required to act upon a valid court order or government
directive f or content removal, not upon private complaints. the court also
emphasized that the intermediaries should not take a proactive role in

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
monitoring content, as this could potentially inf ringe on f ree speech.
While the law provides a saf e harbor, it does not absolve intermediaries
f rom their responsibilities.

Online def amation cases of ten involve a balancing act between the right
to f reedom of expression and the right to reputation. the indian legal
system requires a caref ul examination of the content, context, and intent
of the statements to determine whether they qualif y as def amatory.
Additionally, the plaintif f in an online def amation case must prove that the
statement was f alse, damaging to their reputation, and made with a
degree of f ault, such as negligence or actual malice.
What is the primary f ocus of the passage?

(A) the rise of social media in India.

(b) the legal aspects of online def amation in India.

(C) the role of intermediaries in online content.

(d) the importance of f ree speech on the internet.

What is online def amation, as described in the passage?

(A) making harmf ul statements about someone in person.

(b) False statements made on the internet that harm someone’s
reputation.

(C) Online harassment.

(d) A f orm of political activism.

What is the signif icance of Section 79 of the Inf ormation

Technology Act, 2000, as mentioned in the passage?
(A) It def ines def amation laws in India.

(b) it provides saf e harbor f or intermediaries in cases of online

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
def amation.

(C) it regulates the content on social media platf orms.

(d) it allows private complaints against online def amation.

According to the Supreme Court in the Shreya Singhal v. Union of
India case, under what circumstances should intermediaries act in
response to content removal?
(A) upon receiving a private complaint.

(b) upon a valid court order or government directive.

(C) Proactively to monitor content.

(d) Only if the content is f ound to be def amatory.

How does the indian legal system balance the right to Freedom of
expression and the right to reputation in online def amation cases?

(A) by f avoring f reedom of expression over reputation.

(b) by f avoring reputation over f reedom of expression.

(C) by caref ully examining the content, context, and intent of statements.

(d) by absolving intermediaries of their responsibilities.

In an online def amation case, what must the plaintif f prove about
the def amatory statement?

(A) that it was political activism.

(b) that it was made with good intentions.

(C) that it was true and intended to inf orm the public.
(d) that it was f alse, damaging to their reputation, and made with a degree
of f ault.

What is the role of intermediaries in the context of online

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
def amation cases?
(A) to actively monitor and censor content.

(b) to act upon private complaints f or content removal.

(C) to completely absolve themselves of liability.

(d) to encourage online def amation.

Paragraph 3

The editors Guild of india has expressed concern over the “draconian
provisions” of the Press and registration of Periodicals (PrP) bill, 2023,
that can have an adverse impact on f reedom of the press. The Guild
added: “Editors Guild of India would like the proposed bill to ensure that
publishing of news in india remains f ree of encumbrances and intrusive
checks on publishers by the registrar, and that the primary emphasis of
the registrar and the PrP remains ‘registration’ and not ‘regulation’, as the
latter has the potential of restricting f reedom of the press.”
“In the def initions section, the term ‘specif ied authority’ gives power to
government agencies beyond the Press registrar, to conduct the
f unctions of the registrar, which could even include police and other law
enf orcement agencies. Given the intrusive, expansive, and vague nature
of powers that the bill in any case allows to the Press registrar, the power
to f urther delegate this power to other government agencies including law
enf orcement agencies is deeply distressing,” the Guild said.

The statement says sections 4(1) and 11(4) allow the registrar to deny
the right to bring out a periodical and cancel the certif icate of registration
of a periodical to persons convicted of “terrorist act or unlawf ul activity”
or “f or having done anything against the security of the State”.
“interestingly, the Prb Act, 1867, had no such provisions.

Given the liberal and arbitrary use of UAPA (which is the basis f or def ining

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
‘terrorist act’ and ‘unlawf ul activity’), as well as other criminal laws,
including sedition, against journalists and media organisations to
suppress f reedom of speech, the Guild is deeply concerned by the
introduction of these new provisions, and the way they can be misused to
deny the right to bring out news publications to persons who are critical
of governments,” it said.
Among the other worrisome provisions listed by the Guild is Section 6(b),
which gives power to the Press Registrar (as well as any other “specif ied
authority”) to enter the premises of a periodical to “inspect or take copies
of the relevant records or documents or ask any questions necessary f or
obtaining any inf ormation required to be f urnished”.
The PRP Bill def ines “newspaper” to mean a periodical of loose-
f olded sheets usually printed on newsprint and brought out daily or
at least once in a week, containing inf ormation on current events,
public news or comments on public news. Who among the f ollowing
is covered by the def inition of newspaper?

(A) Mr. X publishing news content on digital media.

(b) Mr. Y publishing books containing the comments of the public on

public news.

(C) Mr. Z publishing news content in print media on weekly basis.

(d) All of the above.

Who among the f ollowing is not eligible to publish a periodical as
per the PrP bill?

(A) Mr. A convicted of waging war against Government of India.

(b) Mr. b, accused of unlawf ul activities under the unlawf ul Activities
Prevention Act.
(C) Mr. C, accused of terrorist activities under the unlawf ul Activities

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
Prevention Act.

(d) All of the above.

Which of the f ollowing is a threat to the f reedom of press in India?

(A) Liberal use of unlawf ul Activities Prevention Act against Journalists

ref rains journalists f rom tracing, tracking and publishing investigative
articles because they apprehend that they might be linked with criminals.

(b) use of Sedition laws against journalists under the guise that through
their articles they are promoting hatred and exciting disaf f ection against
the government.

(C) Levy of GSt on newspapers.

(d) both (A) and (b).
The PRP Bill def ines “specif ied authority” to mean a District
Magistrate or Collector or such other of f icer as the State
Government or, as the case may be, Union territory Administration
may, by notif ication, specif y. The PRP Bill is criticised by Editors
Guild of India because:
(A) The def inition of specif ied authority is too wide and can include even
of f icers below the level of Collector. The PRP Bill enables the specif ied
authority to perf orm the f unctions of Press registrar General.
(b) the PrP bill conf ers various powers on the Press registrar General
including the power to register, deny registration, cancel the registration,
etc.

(C) The PRP Bill enables the specif ied authority to enter the premises of
a periodical f or inspection (d) All of the above.
Freedom of press is not specif ically guaranteed under the
Constitution of India but is implied in Article 19(1)(a) i.e. Freedom of

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.
Speech and expression. theref ore, f reedom of press is part of
f undamental rights.
(A) Freedom of press being a f undamental right, no law can be made f or
registration and denial of registration of newspapers.
(b) Fundamental rights are not absolute rights and reasonable restrictions
can be imposed on the exercise of f undamental rights and theref ore, laws
such as PrP bill can be enacted.
(C) Freedom of press being a f undamental right, journalists and press is
exempt f rom the operation of general criminal law of the country.
(d) None of the above.
PrP bill denies the right to publish periodicals to a person who has
been f ound to have committed a terrorist act and has been
convicted by a competent Court in india. Which of the f ollowing is
most appropriate reason?

(A) the right to publish a periodical is denied because criminals do not

possess any f undamental rights.
(b) the right to publish a periodical is denied because such a person is a
threat to the society and nation.
(C) the right to publish a periodical is denied because they may not be
neutral in reporting and may incite violence and spread disaf f ection
against the state being themselves involved in terrorist acts.
(d) All of the above.

Disclaim e r: This PDF is auto -generated based o n the info rmatio n available o n Shiksha as
o n 12-No v-20 24.