Ind Pak Bang
Ind Pak Bang
A COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS
28 NOVEMBER,2024
2
ABSTRACT:
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the historical, social, and political
developments of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, three countries that share a common
colonial past but have taken distinct paths in their post-independence trajectories. The study
explores key themes such as the formation of governments, the impact of major wars, the
role of religion and ethnicity in shaping national identities, and significant political events
such as India's Emergency (1975-77) and the Assam Accord (1985). The paper also examines
the socio-political dynamics of Muslim migration, particularly in the context of post-partition
migration between India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. By analyzing these factors, the paper
aims to offer a nuanced understanding of the challenges and achievements of these nations,
highlighting the complex interplay between historical events, governance systems, and social
structures that continue to influence the political landscapes of South Asia.
INTRODUCTION:
India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, all emerging from the remnants of British colonial rule,
share a common historical foundation yet present a remarkable contrast in their political
structures, social systems, and international relations. The partition of British India in 1947
led to the creation of India and Pakistan, a division largely based on religious lines that
sowed the seeds for decades of tension and conflict. Bangladesh, once part of Pakistan as
East Pakistan, gained its independence in 1971 after a violent liberation war. The trajectory
of each country has been shaped by its response to these formative events, with India
becoming the world’s largest democracy, Pakistan facing alternating military and civilian
governments, and Bangladesh struggling with political instability and economic
development.
This paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of these three nations, focusing on their
historical evolution, social structures, and political dynamics. Key areas of exploration
include the historical events that led to the creation of these nations, the wars that have
defined their relations, and the role of religion and ethnicity in shaping national identities.
Special attention is given to India’s Emergency period, the Assam Accord, and the complex
issue of Muslim migration in the region. By examining these diverse factors, the paper seeks
to understand the shared experiences and divergent paths of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh,
offering insight into their current political and social landscapes and the ongoing challenges
they face in the modern world.
3
HISTORY
HISTORY OF INDIA:-
HISTORY OF PAKISTAN:-
HISTORY OF BANGLADESH
SOCIAL STRUCTURE(ELITES)
The social structure in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh has historical, cultural, and political
roots that significantly shape the elites in each country. The elites in these societies often
refer to those who hold economic, political, social, and cultural power, and they may differ
based on caste, class, religious background, and regional influences. Here's a detailed
comparison in a table format to outline the key types of elites in each country:
Political India's political elite is The political elite is Political elites are
Power often divided between often led by a few typically concentrated in
regional and national powerful families a few powerful families
factions. Parties like (Bhuttos, Sharifs). The (e.g., Sheikh Hasina’s
the BJP (Bharatiya military exerts family, Khaleda Zia’s
Janata Party), substantial influence family). The military has
Congress, and regional over national politics, historically played an
parties play a large with coups and influential role in
role in shaping military rulers (e.g., politics, with periods of
governance, and General Zia, General military rule in
dynastic politics are Musharraf) playing a Bangladesh’s history.
prevalent (e.g., the central role in
Gandhi family). Pakistan’s history.
Social and The Indian elites have Pakistan’s cultural Bangladesh’s cultural
Cultural significant influence elites are mostly elite is largely
Influence over media, cinema urban, with a strong concentrated in Dhaka,
(Bollywood), and presence in the arts, with a rich history in
intellectual life. The media, and film arts, literature, and
elites in India, (Lollywood). cinema. Political and
especially the upper- Religious elites also business elites also have
caste Hindus, also influence cultural life a strong presence in the
dominate cultural through media and cultural sphere.
institutions like institutions.
education and the arts.
Religious The Indian elites are In Pakistan, Islam is a Bangladesh’s elites are
Influence often split between defining feature of the predominantly Muslim,
Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, elite class, with many but the country has a
and Christian elites promoting significant secular elite
communities, but Islamic values through that influences national
Hindu elites have their political politics. Religious elites,
historically held the platforms. Religious such as those from
most power. Religious parties like Jamaat-e- Jamaat-e-Islami, have
identity influences Islami also play a role had some influence but
8
Challenges to India’s elites face Pakistan’s elite class Bangladesh’s elites face
Elite Power challenges from faces challenges from challenges from rising
regional parties, caste- religious extremism, populist movements,
based movements, and ethnic tensions, and increasing political
rising economic growing civilian polarization, and
inequality. The discontent with criticism of dynastic
growing influence of military dominance. politics. The political
populist leaders and There is also influence of the military,
the expansion of the increasing pressure while somewhat
middle class are also from emerging reduced, still remains a
reshaping elite power. political forces like challenge to civilian
Imran Khan's PTI. governance.
9
independen nce
ce from struggle.
Pakistan. -
Pakistan’s
military
defeat and
surrender
on 16
December.
Kargil India vs May Pakistani India regained -
War Pakistan 1999 – forces control of Pakistan'
July infiltrated Kargil, s covert
1999 Kashmir Pakistan operation
(specificall withdrew, : Forces
y the international infiltrated
Kargil condemnation Kargil in
region). of Pakistan’s 1999.
actions. - Heavy
casualties
on both
sides,
especially
among
Pakistani
forces.
Siachen India vs Ongoin Territorial Ceasefire; no - India's
Conflict Pakistan g since dispute major military military
April over the action, but the operation
1984 Siachen conflict in 1984 to
Glacier in remains assert
the unresolved. control
Karakora over the
m Range. Siachen
Glacier.
-
Continuou
s standoff,
with both
countries
maintainin
g high-
altitude
positions.
Rann of India vs April A border Ceasefire Skirmishe
Kutch Pakistan 1965 conflict brokered by s broke out
Conflict over the British in the
12
Kashmir Conflict:
o The Kashmir dispute has been a long-standing issue since 1947, with India
and Pakistan fighting multiple wars over the region. Even though no full-
scale wars have occurred since 1999, cross-border skirmishes and terrorist
activities continue.
Baluchistan Insurgencies:
o Baloch separatist movements in Pakistan’s Balochistan province have
received occasional support from India. However, Pakistan has maintained
control over the region, despite multiple insurgencies.
Conclusion:
The wars between India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh have been largely defined by the
Kashmir dispute, the Bangladesh Liberation War, and periodic skirmishes along borders.
Despite several ceasefires and peace efforts, the historical tensions between these countries,
particularly over Kashmir and the legacy of the 1971 Bangladesh War, continue to shape
their geopolitical relationships. The Kargil War and ongoing tensions over Siachen show
that, while large-scale wars have decreased, military conflicts and border disputes remain an
enduring issue in the region.
INDIA’S EMERGENCY
15
India's Emergency refers to a period of 21 months from June 25, 1975, to March 21, 1977,
when Prime Minister Indira Gandhi declared a state of national emergency under Article 352
of the Indian Constitution. This allowed her government to rule by decree, limit civil
liberties, and suspend elections.
ASPECT DETAILS
Reason for Emergency Indira Gandhi's government faced political instability, rising
opposition, and court cases challenging her election victory (e.g.,
the Allahabad High Court's verdict in 1975).
Date of Declaration June 25, 1975
Duration June 25, 1975, to March 21, 1977 (21 months)
Article Invoked Article 352 of the Indian Constitution, which allows the President
to declare an emergency in case of "internal disturbance" or war.
Key Events During 1. Suspension of Fundamental Rights: The government
Emergency curtailed freedoms such as the right to life, freedom of speech,
and protection from arbitrary arrest (Article 21).
2. Mass Arrests: Opposition leaders, activists, and critics of the
government were arrested without trial, including leaders like
Jayaprakash Narayan.
3. Censorship: The media was heavily censored, with reports
critical of the government being banned or altered.
4. Forced Sterilization Program: To control population growth,
a controversial forced sterilization campaign was launched.
5. Emergency Rule: Indira Gandhi ruled by presidential decree,
bypassing the Parliament and Constitutionally required checks
and balances.
Political Consequences 1. Political Repression: The opposition was silenced, civil
liberties were curtailed, and dissent was suppressed.
2. Public Backlash: Over time, growing public dissatisfaction and
international criticism of authoritarian rule led to protests.
End of Emergency The Emergency ended on March 21, 1977, after a surprise
announcement by Indira Gandhi following the electoral defeat of
the Congress party in the 1977 general elections.
Aftermath 1. 1977 General Elections: The opposition, united under the
Janata Party, won a landslide victory, and Indira Gandhi's
Congress party suffered a major defeat.
2. Long-Term Impact: The Emergency marked a significant shift
in Indian politics. It led to a distrust of unchecked power, and the
safeguards in the Constitution were emphasized.
Key Figures 1. Indira Gandhi: Prime Minister who declared the Emergency.
2. Jayaprakash Narayan: Leader of the opposition movement
against the Emergency.
3. Morarji Desai: Became the Prime Minister after the Janata
16
Political instability: Indira Gandhi faced growing opposition from both within and
outside her party (Indian National Congress).
Election Controversy: In 1975, the Allahabad High Court declared Indira Gandhi’s
1971 election victory invalid, citing electoral malpractice. The court ordered her to be
disqualified.
Growing Dissent: Protests led by Jayaprakash Narayan and other leaders, as well as
widespread unrest, led Indira Gandhi to declare the emergency.
Impact on Democracy:
The 44th Amendment of the Indian Constitution (1978) was passed to prevent the
recurrence of such a situation. It restored safeguards for personal freedoms and made
it harder to declare an Emergency in the future.
The migration of Muslim populations during the Partition of India in 1947, which led to the
creation of India, Pakistan, and later Bangladesh, was a significant historical event with
lasting socio-political consequences. Below is a comparative table explaining the migration
of Muslim populations to India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh during and after Partition:
Muslim Population Migration in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh (1947 and After)
Conclusion:
The migration of Muslims across India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh was a deeply complex and
traumatic event that shaped the political and demographic landscape of South Asia. It
resulted in long-lasting effects, including communal tensions, the reconfiguration of national
identities, and the reshaping of socio-political structures in these countries. While Pakistan
emerged as a Muslim-majority state, India retained a large Muslim minority, and
Bangladesh, after its independence, became home to a majority Muslim population but with a
strong sense of Bengali identity.
ASSAM ACCORD
20
The Assam Accord refers to an agreement signed in 1985 between the Government
of India and the leaders of Assam, particularly to resolve issues related to illegal
immigration from Bangladesh into Assam and to address ethnic and regional
concerns in the state.
CONCLUSION
21
India:
o History: India was the largest colony of the British Empire and gained
independence in 1947 after a long struggle led by the Indian National
Congress and Mahatma Gandhi. The partition of India into India and
Pakistan was one of the most traumatic events in its history, leading to large-
scale violence, migration, and long-lasting tensions.
o Government Formation: India adopted a democratic parliamentary system
with a secular constitution in 1950. It embraced federalism, recognizing its
diverse linguistic, cultural, and religious composition. India has largely stayed
committed to democratic governance despite challenges.
Pakistan:
o History: Pakistan was created as a separate state for Muslims after the
partition of British India in 1947, driven by the ideology of Two-Nation
Theory led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Pakistan's creation was rooted in
religious identity, but this has led to significant identity crises over the years,
with tensions between its Islamic identity and the aspirations for democratic
governance.
o Government Formation: Pakistan adopted a parliamentary system but has
alternated between democracy and military rule. The military has played a
major role in the country's political landscape, with multiple military coups
and periods of military dictatorship (e.g., General Ayub Khan, Zia-ul-Haq,
and Pervez Musharraf).
Bangladesh:
o History: Bangladesh was originally part of Pakistan as East Pakistan, but
after years of political and economic marginalization, it gained
independence in 1971 following a brutal war of independence, which resulted
in the Bangladesh Liberation War. The war was heavily influenced by
ethnic, linguistic, and political tensions between East and West Pakistan.
o Government Formation: After independence, Bangladesh initially adopted a
parliamentary system and secular constitution. However, it has been
politically unstable, marked by periods of military rule and civilian
governance led by major political dynasties (primarily the Awami League
and BNP).
2. Social Structure:
22
India:
o Diversity: India’s social structure is incredibly diverse, with multiple ethnic
groups, languages, and religions. The caste system (Hinduism's social
hierarchy) has historically played a dominant role, though it has been
officially abolished and addressed through affirmative action policies (e.g.,
reservation for lower castes).
o Religious and Cultural Diversity: India is home to a large number of
religions, including Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Sikhism, and others,
which has created both vibrant pluralism and religious tensions, especially
between Hindus and Muslims.
Pakistan:
o Ethnic and Religious Divide: Pakistan’s social structure has been influenced
by its foundation as an Islamic state, although there are significant ethnic
groups, including Punjabis, Pashtuns, Sindhis, and Baloch, each with its own
identity. The religious minorities, particularly Hindus and Christians, face
discrimination in various forms.
o Islamic Identity: Pakistan’s political structure is shaped by its Islamic
identity, and Islamic fundamentalism has influenced various political
movements. Tensions exist between secular and religious political forces,
with frequent struggles over the role of Islam in governance.
Bangladesh:
o Ethnic and Religious Diversity: Bangladesh is primarily Bengali and
Muslim, but it also has minority populations of Hindus and other ethnic
groups. Bangladesh has had tensions over Islamic vs. secular political
ideologies, with the rise of Islamist parties challenging its secular
foundations.
o Social Structure: Bangladesh, like India, faces challenges with poverty and
class disparities, but has made remarkable strides in gender equality (e.g.,
women in government, microfinance programs, etc.).
o Despite multiple wars and skirmishes, India and Pakistan have not gone to
war since 1999, but the Kashmir conflict and cross-border terrorism
remain unresolved sources of tension.
India and Bangladesh:
o The primary conflict between India and Bangladesh was the 1971 Liberation
War, where India intervened to support the Bengali independence movement
against Pakistan. This war resulted in the creation of Bangladesh as a separate
nation.
o Since 1971, India and Bangladesh have generally maintained peaceful
relations, although issues like water-sharing, border disputes, and the
treatment of Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh have occasionally caused
tensions.
Pakistan and Bangladesh:
o Bangladesh Liberation War (1971): This remains the most significant
conflict between Pakistan and Bangladesh. The war was a brutal civil war,
with millions of lives lost and atrocities committed, leading to the breakup of
Pakistan and the creation of Bangladesh. The war’s scars have created
lingering bitterness between the two countries, though diplomatic relations
have improved in recent years.
4. Conclusion:
The political, social, and military histories of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh reflect both
shared legacies and distinct national identities.
India has emerged as a democratic secular state with a focus on economic growth
and pluralism, despite ongoing challenges related to religious tension and regional
inequalities.
Pakistan, rooted in its Islamic identity, has experienced military coups, and civilian
unrest, with its military playing a crucial role in governance and foreign policy.
Pakistan’s relations with India, particularly over Kashmir, remain a central issue in
its political landscape.
Bangladesh, formed from the ashes of Pakistan, has evolved into a parliamentary
democracy, although political polarization and the legacy of its liberation war
continue to shape its internal politics and regional relations.
Bibliography:
24