0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views1 page

Contemporary Political Theory

Uploaded by

Ayush Raj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views1 page

Contemporary Political Theory

Uploaded by

Ayush Raj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

 Contemporary Political Theory  Settings

 Share

holding those preferences 9 14 .

Add
● For

instance, in situations
note Select all with significant economic inequality, the preferences of wealthier individuals might be given more
 weight in the political process, potentially silencing the voices of less affluent citizens 15 .
● Deliberative democrats believe that addressing such power imbalances is crucial for establishing a genuinely democratic 
  Saved Response
process 16 .  Saved Response
Summary of Key Differences:
New Saved Note New Saved Note
 Feature Deliberative Democracy Here is information from theAggregative
Comparing Dworkin's Equality of Re- sources youModel
pro-
vided on Steven Lukes' threeMechanism
dimensionsfor
of aggregating individual
 sources
Concept of Democracy Process of reasoned discussion
power:and debate
preferences
Dworkin presents equality of resources as a
 Modedistributive
superior of Participation Active,of
ideal to equality transformative,
wel-
Steven Lukes argues that power is an
reasoned argumentation Voting, expressing pre-formed preferences
"essentially contested concept" be-
fare because it better accommodates the prin-
Basis of Decision- Consensus through persuasion, cause
mutualpeople have differing viewscompromise
Bargaining, on how among competing
 ciple of special responsibility, which states that
Makingare ultimately responsibleunderstanding society functions, what constitutes justice
interests
individuals for the
and equity, and therefore, what power
success of their own lives [1, 2]. Dworkin argues
 Addressing Power Focus on creating a more inclusive
that equality of welfare, which aims to equalize
and
truly is. egalitarian May
[1, 2] This leads unintentionally
to three dimen- reinforce existing
Dynamics process sions of power. [3] inequalities

 10 citations
Focus
10 citations
Transforming preferences, creating a shared
Combining pre-existing preferences
understanding

 Challenges and Critiques


Saved Response Saved Response
The 
sources recognize that there are challenges and limitations to implementing the ideals of deliberative democracy,
 New Saved Note
particularly in large and complex societies. New Saved Note

 Dworkin's Theory of Equality: A Com- Berlin's Concept of Negative Liberty


How does associational democracy differ from council democracy?
prehensive Overview
What are the core tenets of consociational democracy?

How does Dr
The quote "The wider the area of non-interfer-
 Ronald Dworkin, a prominent legal and political ence the wider my freedom" encapsulates Isa-
iah Berlin's concept of negative liberty. This

philosopher,
 Close argued
Chat that equality 15
issources Start typing...
the funda-
mental value in political morality. [1] He

idea posits that freedom is primarily defined by
* Notebook guide

viewed equality not as a specific distributive the absence of external constraints imposed
NotebookLM can make mistakes, so double-check it.
pattern but as a commitment to treating individ- by others on an individual's actions. [1-3]

You might also like