AP Physics C - Rotational Motion I
AP Physics C - Rotational Motion I
AP Physics C
The radian
There are 2 types of pure unmixed motion:
Translational - linear motion
Rotational - motion involving a rotation or revolution around a
fixed chosen axis( an axis which does not move).
Half a radian would subtend an arc length equal to half the radius and 2
radians would subtend an arc length equal to two times the radius.
Example: v =3i
This tells us that the magnitude is 3 m/s, the axis is the "x" axis and
the direction is in the "positive sense".
Translation vs. Rotation
Translational motion tells you THREE
THINGS
• magnitude of the motion and the units
• Axis the motion occurs on
• direction on the given axis
Example: v =3i
This tells us that the magnitude is 3 m/s,
the axis is the "x" axis and the direction is
in the "positive sense".
= 5 rad/sec k
= -5 rad/sec k
Angular Acceleration
∆v Once again, following the same lines of
a= → translational acceleration
∆t logic. Since acceleration is defined as the
∆ω rate of change of velocity. We can say the
α = → rotational acceleration ANGULAR ACCELERATION is defined
∆t
as the rate of change of the angular
dv dω velocity.
a = ,α =
dt dt
Also, we can say that the ANGULAR
ACCELERATION is the TIME
DERIVATIVE OF THE ANGULAR
x = ∫ v dt , θ = ∫ ω dt VELOCITY.
v = vo + at → ω = ωo + αt
x = xo + vot + 1 at 2 → θ = θ o + ωot + 1 αt 2
2 2
v 2 = vo2 + 2a∆x → ω 2 = ωo2 + 2α∆θ
Example
A turntable capable of 2
α = 12 rad / s
angularly accelerating at
12 rad/s2 needs to be ∆θ = 400 rad
given an initial angular t = 6s
velocity if it is to rotate
ωo = ?
through a net 400 radians
in 6 seconds. What must ∆θ = ωo 2t + 1 αt 2
its initial angular velocity
2
be? 400 = ωo (6) + (0.5)(12)(6) 2
ωo = 30.7 rad/s
Rotational Kinetic Energy and Inertia
Just like massive bodies tend
K = 1 mv 2 , vt = rω
to resist changes in their 2
motion ( AKA - "Inertia") .
K = 1 m(rω ) 2
Rotating bodies also tend 2
to resist changes in their
K = 1 mr 2ω 2 , I = ∑ mr 2
motion. We call this 2
ROTATIONAL INERTIA.
K rot = 1 Iω 2
We can determine its 2
expression by looking at
Kinetic Energy.
We now have an expression for the rotation of a
mass in terms of the radius of rotation.
We call this quantity the MOMENT OF INERTIA (I)
with units kgm2
Moment of Inertia, I Consider 2 masses, m1 & m2,
rigidly connected to a bar of
negligible mass. The system
r1
vt = rω
Moment of Inertia, I
Since both masses are moving they have kinetic energy
or rotational kinetic in this case.
K = K1 + K 2
K = 1 m1v12 + 1 m2 v22 , vt = rω r1
2 2
K = 1 m1 (r12ω 2 ) + 1 m2 (r22ω 2 ) m1 m2
2 2
K = 1 (m1r12 + m2 r22 )ω 2 r2
2
N
K = 1 (∑ mi ri 2 )ω 2 → K = 1 Iω 2
2 i =1 2
EXAMPLE #1 -The moment of Inertia when they are rotating around the
center of their rod.
I = ∑ mr 2 = mr 2 + mr 2
I = (3)(2) 2 + (3)(2) 2 = 24 kgm2
m1 m2
2m
I = ∑ mr 2 = mr 2 + mr 2
2 2
I = (3)(2) + (3)(6) = 120 kgm2
As you can see, the FARTHER the axis of rotation is from the center of mass,
the moment of inertia increases. We need an expression that will help us
determine the moment of inertia when this situation arises.
Parallel Axis Theorem
This theorem will allow us to calculate the moment of
inertia of any rotating body around any axis,
provided we know the moment of inertia about the
center of mass.
It basically states that the Moment of Inertia ( Ip) around any axis "P" is
equal to the known moment of inertia (Icm) about some center of mass plus
M ( the total mass of the system) times the square of "d" ( the distance
between the two parallel axes)
Using the prior example let’s use the parallel axis theorem to calculate the
moment of inertia when it is rotating around one end and 2m from a fixed
axis.
Exam – Parallel Axis Theorem
I p = I cm + Md 2
I p = (24) + (6)(2) 2 = 48 kgm2 m1 m2
d = 2m
m1 m2
I p = I cm + Md 2 4m
2
I p = (24) + (6)(4) = 120 kgm2
(not drawn to scale)
Continuous Masses
Σmr2, worked fine for what is called
The earlier equation, I =Σ
POINT masses. But what about more continuous masses
like disks, rods, or sphere where the mass is extended
over a volume or area. In this case, calculus is needed.
I = ∑ mr 2 → I = ∫ r 2 dm
dr
M
Macro → λ =
L
dm dm
Micro → λ = = dm = λdr
dx dr The CM acts as the origin in the
L2 case of determining the limits.
I = ∫ r dm → ∫
2
r 2 (λ )dr
−L 2
3
L2 M r
I = λ ∫ r 2 dr → | |−LL2 2
−L 2 L 3
2
3
M L 8 −L 8 3
M L L 3 3 ML
I= ( − )→ ( + ) = I rod @ cm =
L 3 3 L 24 24 12
Your turn
What if the rod were rotating on one of its ENDS?
I = ∑ mr 2 → I = ∫ r 2 dm
M
Macro → λ =
L
dm dm
Micro → λ = = dm = λdr
dx dr
dr
L
I = ∫ r dm → ∫ r (λ )dr
2 2
0
3
L M r
I = λ ∫ r 2 dr → | |0L As you can see you get
a completely different
0 L 3 expression depending
M L3 ML2 on HOW the body is
I= ( − 0) = I rod @ end = rotating.
L 3 3
The disk
I = ∑ mr → I = ∫ r dm
2 2
R
M M r
Macro → σ = = 2
A πR
dx
dm dm
Micro → σ = = dm = σ 2πrdr
dA 2πrdx(or dr ) 2π
πr
R
I = ∫ r dm → ∫ r 2 (σ 2πr )dr
2 dx
0
4
R 2πM r
I = 2πσ ∫ r 3 dr → 2
| | R
0
0 πR 4
2M R 4 MR 2
I = 2 ( − 0) = I disk @ cm =
R 4 2
The bottom line..