Tec Empresarial
Tec Empresarial
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Academic procrastination seems to have become inseparable from
our habits. Theoretically, procrastination refers to postponing specific
tasks by individuals, such as writing a paper, preparing for an
examination, reading books to finish some assignments, attending
classes, and finishing academic tasks. Previous research shows that
50% of students in higher education experience academic
procrastination. Savira & Suharsono reveal that 52.1% of the eleventh
graders of the acceleration class show a high level of academic
procrastination, while the rest 47.9% show a low level of academic
procrastination. An experimental study shows that 3.8% of students in
the experimental group show a low level of academic procrastination,
65.4% show a moderate level, and 30.8% show a high level of academic
procrastination (Gading).
The empirical data confirm that academic procrastination is
rather complicated (Aderanti et al., 2013); in other words, academic
procrastination is complex and may negatively impact individuals
METHOD
Research Design
This study aims to adapt the PASS instrument following the
Indonesian culture and to validate the instrument (1984) using the
Indonesian language. The lingua-adaptation of PASS refers to adapting
the instrument from the English version into the Indonesian version.
The translation process covered the interlinguistic and intercultural
aspects. Psychometric analysis was used in the validation process of
PASS in the Indonesian version.
Research Instrument
We employed PASS with 4 (four) indicators: (1) delays in starting
or completing tasks; (2) delays in doing assignments; (3) delays or
differences in time between planned and actual performance; and (4)
doing other activities considered more fun than doing the assignments
or tasks.
Participants
The targets of this study were students of public senior high
schools (eleventh graders) in Mojokerto Regency of East Java Province;
the students were 17 or 18 years old. We had 500 students as our
participants. They all agreed to become our research participants by
filling in the statement letter confirming their willingness to be involved
in the research; this was done to maintain their confidentiality.
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using CFA with AMOS-20 software. The
analysis aimed at obtaining the psychometric properties of CAMS-R by
task?”. Item number 18 was “To what extent do you want to decrease
your tendency to procrastinate on these activities?”, and it was changed
into “To what extent would you like to reduce your procrastination
tendencies on that task?”. However, upon checking, the meaning of the
new versions was the same as the original ones. Thus, there was no
change in the synthesis results.
A qualitative test was done to verify the accuracy of the items; the
test involved 6 (six) students in the eleventh grade. If there were
suggestions from the participants, the item could be revised. After the
modification or adaptation, the final version of PASS in the Indonesian
language could be used.
No Original
Back-
Version Translate (1) Translate (2) Synthesis
Translation
(English)
9 To what Sejauh mana Sejauh mana Sejauh mana To what extent
extent do you Anda ingin Anda Anda do you want to
want to mengurangi berkeinginan berkeinginan decrease your
decrease your kecenderungan untuk untuk tendency to
tendency to Anda untuk mengurangi mengurangi procrastinate
procrastinate menunda- kecenderungan kecenderungan this task?
this task? Anda untuk Anda untuk
nunda tugas
menunda tugas menunda tugas
ini?
ini? ini?
18 To what Sejauh mana Sejauh mana Sejauh mana To what extent
extent do you Anda ingin Anda Anda do you want to
want to mengurangi berkeinginan berkeinginan decrease your
decrease your kecenderungan untuk untuk tendency to
tendency to Anda untuk mengurangi mengurangi procrastinate on
procrastinate menunda- kecenderungan kecenderungan these activities?
on these nunda tugas Anda untuk Anda untuk
activities? ini? menunda menunda
aktivitas- kegiatan
aktivitas tersebut?
tersebut?
The instrument trial involved 501 students in the eleventh grade
of 3 (three) SMAN (public senior high schools) in Mojokerto Regency,
including 155 students of SMAN 1 Kutorejo, 206 students of SMAN 1
Gedeg, and 140 students of SMAN 1 Sooko.
The data analysis included (a) choosing items, (b) testing validity,
and (c) testing CAMS-R reliability. Mindfulness was divided into 4 (four)
aspects: academic procrastination and the reasons for academic
procrastination. The results of CFA with AMOS-20 software showed that
all items were well validated, except for 6 (six) items on the PASS
instrument. The 6 (six) items were on indicators of (1) anxiety facing
evaluation, (2) dependence on others, and (3) threat from the task.
The following are the results of the trial involving the 501
students as the research participants:
There were 6 (six) PASS items that did not fulfill the validity and
reliability requirements. Thus, a language and cultural adjustment were
needed involving 6 (six) respondents. Then, we synthesized the results.
The following is the result of the language adjustment process:
Statement Items (Before) Statement Items (After)
Anda merasa khawatir guru Anda tidak Anda khawatir jika guru Anda tidak
menyukai tugas yang sudah Anda menyukai hasil tugas Anda
kerjakan
Anda merasa khawatir jika Anda akan Anda khawatir jika mendapatkan nilai
mendapat nilai jelek jelek
Anda menunggu sampai seorang teman Anda menunggu seorang teman
menyelesaikan tugasnya supaya ia dapat menyelesaikan tugas agar bisa membantu
Anda
Ada hal yang Anda perlu tanyakan Ada yang ingin Anda tanyakan kepada
kepada guru Anda, tetapi Anda merasa guru, tetapi Anda tidak bertanya
tidak
Anda merasa tidak memiliki informasi Anda merasa tidak memiliki informasi
yang cukup tentang bagaimana menulis yang cukup untuk menulis
Anda sungguh tidak menyukai tugas Anda sangat tidak menyukai tugas
membuat makalah (menyusun makalah)
The Indonesian version of PASS, which was validated to test the
measuring instrument, was conducted on 501 respondents (class XI
SMAN students in Mojokerto Regency). PASS consists of 2 aspects,
namely the area of procrastination and the reason for procrastination.
After the CFA analysis, there are 6 items that have not been able to
meet the validation standard. Thus, a qualitative test was conducted on
6 (six) students to adjust the language and culture.
Overall, the PASS measurement model has empirical
compatibility or has been confirmed by empirical data. Compared with
the original PASS (Fischer & Corcoran, 1994), this study proves that the
CONCLUSION
After the PASS adaptation was carried out in Indonesian and
tested using CFA, the results of selecting items with a loading factor
were of good quality. The PASS measurement model has been confirmed
to have a complete model on empirical data. Therefore, the Indonesian
version of PASS can be used as a valid and reliable measurement tool,
as well as acceptable for high school students in Indonesia.
REFERENCES
Aderanti, R. A., Williams, T. M., Oyinloye, C. A., & Uwanna, N. C.
(2013). The African Symposium : An online journal of the African
Educational Research Network The African Symposium: An online
journal of the African Educational Research Network. The African
Educational Research Network, 13(1), 12–18.
Bond, F. W., & Dryden, W. (2002). Handbook of Brief Cognitive
Behaviour Therapy. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Constantin, K., English, M. M., & Mazmanian, D. (2018). Anxiety,
depression, and procrastination among students: Rumination
plays a larger mediating role than worry. Journal of Rational-
Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 36(1), 15–27.
Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Boucher, D. J., Davidson, L. A., & Munro, Y.
(2016). The Child-Adolescent Perfectionism Scale: Development,
Validation, and Association With Adjustment. Journal of
Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(7), 634–652.
Flett, G. L., Nepon, T., & Hewitt, P. L. (2016). Perfectionism, Worry, and
Rumination in Health and Mental Health: A Review and a
Conceptual Framework for a Cognitive Theory of Perfectionism.
Perfectionism, Health, and Well-Being, 121–155.
Gading, I. K. (2014). Pengaruh pelatihan kendali diri dan jenis kelamin
terhadap perilaku prokrastinasi akademik siswa SMP. Universitas
Negeri Malang.
Goroshit, M., & Hen, M. (2021). Academic procrastination and academic
performance: Do learning disabilities matter? Current Psychology,
40(5), 2490–2498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00183-3
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016).
Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-
PLS: part I – method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to
use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business
Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-
0203
Hidayatur Rahman, D. (2019). The Development and Validation of the
Thesis-Writing Procrastination Scale. International Conference on
Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 65–70.
https://doi.org/10.32698/hum0197
Klingsieck, K. B. (2013). Procrastination in different life-domains: Is
procrastination domain specific? Current Psychology, 32(2), 175–
185.
Michinov, N., Brunot, S., Le Bohec, O., Juhel, J., & Delaval, M. (2011).
Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning
environments. Computers and Education, 56(1), 243–252.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025
Putrisari, F., Hambali, I., & Handarini, D. M. (2017). Hubungan self
efficacy, self esteem dan perilaku prokrastinasi siswa madrasah
aliyah negeri di Malang Raya. TERAPUTIK: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan
Konseling, 1(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.26539/1112
Saputra, W. N. E. (2015). Perbandingan Prokrastinasi Akademik Siswa
SMK melalui Penerapan Teknik Cognitive Restructuring dan
Cognitive Defusion. Program Pascasarjana UM.
Savira, F., & Suharsono, Y. (2013). Self-Regulated Learning (SRL)
dengan Prokrastnasi Akademic pada Siswa Akselerasi. Jurnal
Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 01(01), 66–75.
Savitri, J. J. (2014). Interactive Effect of Prokrastinasi akademik and
Academic Performance on Life Satisfaction. International Journal
of Science and Research, 3(3), 377–381.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginners guide to
structural equation modeling. Routledge.
Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic procrastination:
Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503–509.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503
Talask, G. (2017). Cognitive Behavioral Based Treatment for
Procrastination. Psychology and Behavioral Science International
Journal, 8(1), 8–10.
https://doi.org/10.19080/pbsij.2017.08.555727
van Fleet, D. D., & van Fleet, E. W. (2012). Towards a Behavioral
Description of Managerial Bullying. Employee Responsibilities and
Rights Journal, 24(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-
012-9190-x
Webb, R., & Rosenbaum, P. (2019). The varieties of procrastination:
with different existential positions different reasons for it.
Springer, 53, 525–540.
Yockey, R. D. (2016). Validation of the Short Form of the Academic
Procrastination Scale. Psychological Reports, 118(1), 171–179.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294115626825
Zahra, Y., & Hernawati, N. (2015). Prokastinasi Akademik Menghambat
Peningkatan Prestasi Akademik Remaja di Wilayah Perdesaan.
Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga Dan Konsumen, 8(3), 163–172.
https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2015.8.3.163
Zhang, S., Liu, P., & Feng, T. (2019). To do it now or later: The cognitive
mechanisms and neural substrates underlying procrastination.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 10(4), e1492.