1 s2.0 S0378382024001139 Main
1 s2.0 S0378382024001139 Main
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: The reaction activity of various liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs) over 5 wt% Rh/C (BET surface area
LOHCs 933.5 g/cm3, pore size 4.6 nm, metal dispersion 10.5 %) and 5 wt% Ru/C (BET surface area 888.4 g/cm3, pore
Low-pressure hydrogenation size 6.1 nm, metal dispersion 8.9 %) catalysts is evaluated. The results show that monocyclic aromatic hydro
Competitive effect
carbons have the highest reactivity, followed by monocyclic aromatic rings, while polycyclic and fused cyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons have relatively low activity. It is also found that mixing different LOHCs leads to a
competitive effect, resulting in lower reactivities for all LOHCs. As the degree of LOHC hydrogenation increases,
the adsorption of multi-step hydrogenation intermediates becomes more difficult, resulting in lower yields of
fully hydrogenated products. It is important to understand the behavior of LOHCs in hydrogenation reactions and
to optimize the performance of LOHCs compound systems.
* Corresponding authors.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (Z. Ma), [email protected] (X. Gao), [email protected] (S. Yao).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2024.108143
Received 6 August 2024; Received in revised form 24 September 2024; Accepted 8 October 2024
Available online 15 October 2024
0378-3820/© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc/4.0/).
X. Mei et al. Fuel Processing Technology 265 (2024) 108143
severe problem, especially for the LOHCs process where continuous 2.2. Hydrogenation test of single LOHCs
reactor such as fixed bed reactor is mandatory since the potential haz
ards in the fixed bed are more difficult to control compared to the batch The performance of hydrogenation for single LOHCs was evaluated
reactors, while the gas expansion effect caused by the exotherm of re using an E25 autoclave purchased from Beijing Century Senlong
action will be minimized at low H2 pressure. Thus, the research of low- Experimental Device Co. A total of 250 mg of Ru/C or Rh/C catalyst was
pressure hydrogen storage processes for LOHCs is of serious importance activated at 300 ◦ C for 3 h in a stream of hydrogen at 25 mL/min and
for the engineering and marketing of LOHC technology. Furthermore, then added to the reactor along with 20 mL of liquid-phase hydrogen
the most significant advantage of LOHCs technology over traditional storage carrier. The solid reactants NEC and indole were weighed at 2.5
hydrogen storage technology is that it is not constrained by the harsh g and dissolved in decahydronaphthalene and ethanol solvents,
temperature and pressure conditions typically associated with tradi respectively, to form a 20 mL substrate solution. The hydrogenation
tional hydrogen storage method such as pressurized and low- reaction temperatures were set at 120 and 160 ◦ C for aromatics and
temperature hydrogen storage technology. Consequently, research on nitrogen-containing heterocycles, respectively. The reaction was me
low-pressure hydrogen storage is of paramount importance in expand chanically stirred at 800 rpm for 2 h in hydrogen gas at 0.8 MPa. The
ing the advantages of this technology and facilitating the commerciali reaction was carried out in an air-free environment. After the reaction,
zation and marketability of LOHCs hydrogen storage technology. the liquid phase samples were injected into an Agilent 8860 gas chro
Despite the significance of the low-pressure hydrogenation reactions matograph. The samples were analyzed by gas chromatography using an
in the industrial application, there is a most significant challenge asso HP-5 column.
ciated with low-pressure hydrogen storage technology: the loss of re Reactant conversion and turnover frequency (TOF) are used to esti
action activity and poor conversion rate resulting from a decline, which mate the reaction activity of LOHC and are calculated as follows:
still need further research to solve [15–19]. Wang et al. [20] examined ∑
(ni × yi )
the hydrogenation reaction of furan on the commercial Raney-Ni cata
Reactant conversion = i × 100%
lyst and concluded that in hydrogen pressure range of 2–10 MPa, the n*y
reaction order with respect to hydrogen is approximately one, which ∑
show a strong influence of reaction rate when the pressure dropped. (ni × yi )
i
Heublein et al. [21] focused on the hydrogenation of NEC in different TOF =
nmetal *t
pressure and temperature and found that when the pressure dropped
from 4 MPa to 1 MPa or lower, the conversion of NEC will decrease from The equation above shows ni and yi as the molar amount and molar
90 % towards 30 % or lower respectively. Furthermore, the detrimental hydrogen storage capacity of each hydrogenation product, respectively.
impact of the diminished hydrogen partial pressure on the reaction is Meanwhile, n and y represent the initial feed amount and the total
also evident in the mass transfer step, Wan et al. [22] estimated the hydrogen storage capacity of the hydrogenation, respectively. nmetal
hydrogenation of NEC at different H2 pressure and concluded that for represents the molar amount of metal in the catalyst, and t represents the
the hydrogenation of NEC, the apparent reaction rate was found to be reaction time. The TOF is not really associated with the active reaction
proportional to the apparent concentration of hydrogen, attributing the site, but all metal atoms are considered to be the active reaction sites.
loss of reaction rate to the drop of adsorbed H2 on the surface of cata
lysts. However, recently the scope of relevant reaction activity and ki 2.3. Hydrogenation test of compounding LOHCs
netic analysis is largely confined to a single carrier, and a comprehensive
comparative study of multiple carriers and compounding systems re To evaluate compound hydrogen storage carriers, follow the same
mains limited. methods of product and chromatographic analysis and calculation of
At present, there has been considerable research conducted into the reactant conversion and TOF as for single LOHCs system. The only dif
hydrogenation of organics under low-pressure and mild conditions from ference is the use of different reactants in the compounded system. For
the perspective of the catalyst itself. For example, studies have explored aromatic quinoline/pyridine mixtures forming liquid phase carriers, 10
the use of improved catalysts obtained by nanoparticles (NPs) method mL of liquid phase nitrogen compounds and an equal mass of aromatic
[23–28] to control the size of catalyst, the addition of other metals as hydrocarbons are used for compounding. In the aromatic mixture, 10 mL
auxiliaries [29,30], bimetallic catalysts [26,31–37] and other related of toluene is mixed with an equal mass of benzene/diphenylmethane,
areas of research [38,39]. Nevertheless, the common limitations of these using the most reactive toluene as the precursor. Hydrogenation eval
technologies include their complex production process, high production uation of aromatic hydrocarbons-NEC/indole is carried out in dilute
costs, and limited applicability to laboratory-scale preparations. solution by mixing 2.5 g of NEC/indole with an equal mass of the
Furthermore, it is a challenging task to convert the researches into en complex and diluting to 20 mL with a suitable solvent to feed the
gineering guidance, which can take a considerable period of time. This reaction.
paper therefore attempts to explore the performance of commercial
catalysts under low-pressure hydrogenation conditions based on com 2.4. Characterization of catalyst
mercial catalysts, and to analyze and identify patterns that can be used
to guide the application of commercial catalysts in low-pressure The catalysts are characterized by transmission electron microscopy
hydrogenation. (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Japan, 200 kV), scanning electron microscope
(SEM, Regulus8100, HITACHI, Japan, 200 kV), powder X-ray diffraction
2. Experiment (XRD, Rigaku SmartLab, Cu Kα radiation), N2 sorption isotherm
(QUADRASORB evo, Anton Paar), inductively coupled plasma (ICP,
2.1. Materials Varian ICP-OES 720) and X-ray photoelectron microscopy (XPS, Thermo
ESCALAB 250XI, Al Kα radiation). For SEM and TEM observation,
Sinopharm Chemical Reagents supplies toluene, benzene, quinoline, samples are dispersed in ethanol then dropped and dried on ultrathin
pyridine, and naphthalene (analytically pure). TCI supplies diphenyl carbon membranes for observation. Specific surface area and pore size
methane (analytically pure). Macklin provides N-ethylcarbazole (99 %) are calculated from N2 sorption isotherm using the BET model. For ICP
and Rh/C catalyst (water content 55–60 %). 5 % (dry weight) Ru/C test, the catalysts are dissolved in a mixture of 5 mL HNO3, 3 mL HCl, 1
catalyst and a Rh/C catalyst (with a water content of 55–60 %), both mL HF and 2 mL H2O2, the mixture is heated to 180 ◦ C and kept for 40
purchased from Macklin. min, then the mixture is cooled for the ICP test by using Varian ICP-OES
720. In analyzing the XPS spectra, all binding energies are calibrated by
2
X. Mei et al. Fuel Processing Technology 265 (2024) 108143
Fig. 1. (a, g) TEM image, (b, h) HAADF-STEM image. EDS element scanning of element (c, i) Ru (Rh) and (d, j) C, (e, k) SEM image, (f, l) EDS area scanning of Ru
(Rh) of the catalyst 5 wt% Ru/C and Rh/C.
3
X. Mei et al. Fuel Processing Technology 265 (2024) 108143
Fig. 3. The isotherm linear plot of Ru/C and Rh/C catalyst by BET multi-point method (a), the pore size curve of Ru/C and Rh/C catalyst by BJH desorption method
(b) and micropore analysis by D-A method (c).
Fig. 4. The XPS pattern of Rh/C (a) and Ru/C (b) catalyst after reduction.
4
X. Mei et al. Fuel Processing Technology 265 (2024) 108143
3.3. Hydrogen storage capacity of single LOHCs promote the stability of this catalyst. To get near 100 % conversion, the
ratio of catalyst and reactants is doubled, and the results are shown in
The hydrogenation reaction performance of single LOHCs is shown Fig. 6b. As shown in Fig. 6b, during the test, it can be concluded that the
in the Fig. 5, where the TOF values are the reaction TOF normalized to catalyst can maintain the reaction activity for 400 h despite some small
the number of moles of Ru atoms, rather than the Ru atoms at the active concussions at the beginning.
site, i.e., the apparent TOF values. Selectivity is defined for fully hy
drogenated products, defined as the molar fraction of fully hydroge 3.5. Hydrogen storage capacity of compounding LOHCs
nated products within all hydrogenation products, and for LOHCs (e.g.,
benzene, toluene, and pyridine) where the product is unique and the For the reaction of the compound system, a ratio method is used to
hydrogenation is complete, the selectivity is 100 %. compare the change in the reaction performance of the original sub
As can be seen from Fig. 5, the hydrogen storage of monocyclic ar stance after the addition of the compounded substance, i.e. the ratio of
omatic compounds has a higher hydrogen storage selectivity, which is the hydrogenation TOF after the addition of the compounded substance
related to the fact that there is no stable intermediate in the hydroge to that of the pure substance, and the results are shown in Fig. 7. It can
nation path of monocyclic hydrogen storage carriers, but the large be seen that in most of the compound systems the reaction rate of both
π-bonds of the aromatic ring are directly broken to form 6H products. substances is inhibited, while only one of the substances can be inhibited
For thick and polycyclic LOHCs, as a result of the long reaction path in the TOL-DPM system. Therefore, activity reduction is an issue to be
during hydrogenation [43–45], plenty of intermediates are discovered considered when using complexed systems for hydrogen storage.
in the solution after reaction. Therefore, the selectivity of thick and To investigate the dynamics of the compound systems during the
polycyclic LOHCs under low-pressure hydrogenation conditions is hydrogenation reaction, reaction rates of the TOL-DPM and TOL-QUI
apparently poor, and most of the products are partially hydrogenated. systems are examined. Hydrogenation mixtures of the compound sys
Toluene, benzene and pyridine as monocyclic aromatic groups have tems at different conversion rates are obtained by varying the duration
higher reaction selectivity and are more suitable for low pressure hy of the reaction. The hydrogenation rate ratio (normalized to hydrogen
drogenation. In low-pressure hydrogenation reactions, the TOF of LOHC consumption) is used as an indication of the selectivity. The results are
follows the order of monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons> monocyclic shown in Fig. 8, where a larger ratio means that the reaction has a
nitrogen-containing compounds> polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons> greater selectivity advantage for the substance represented by the x-axis.
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Rh/C catalyst and Ru/C catalyst In these examples the conversion of all reactants is low (<30 %).
exhibit different activities in hydrogenation reactions on different sup It can be seen that for the TOL-DPM system, the weaker competi
ports. Rh/C catalysts have stronger catalytic performance for mono tiveness keeps the reaction rate ratio of the system at a low level,
cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, while Ru/C catalyst is more favorable for however, for the highly competitive system where one of the parties has
hydrogenation of polycyclic and fused ring aromatics. It is speculated a clear advantage (e.g., TOL-QUI), as the reaction proceeds, the rate
that the difference in adsorption capacity between reactants and cata ratio will not show obviously decrease as the reaction progresses, indi
lysts is caused by changes in the number of rings and the presence of N cating that quinoline dominates the hydrogenation of the compound
atoms in aromatic compounds, which is related to the type of LOHC and system, and it does not change with the decrease of quinoline concen
the exposed crystal planes of active metals. tration under lower conversion.
3.4. Stability test towards the Rh/C and Ru/C catalysts 3.6. Analysis and discussions
In order to ensure the conclusion acceptable for the continuous At part 3.3–3.5, plenty of reaction tests are operated to get some
reactor such as fixed bed and fluid bed reactors, the long-time stability principles for LOHCs at the hydrogenation step. And it is concluded that
test towards the catalyst is operated. Toluene is chosen to be the model the compounding LOHCs tend to have a strong competitive effect and
reactant because of its high reaction activity and selectivity. To describe finally resulted in the activity loss of all LOHCs thus the total TOF de
the activity loss, reaction TOF of toluene in each reaction cycle are creases obviously. Combining the BET results which concentrated on the
drawn in Fig. 6a. surface structure of catalyst. The catalyst with mainly micropore struc
In Fig. 6, it can be seen that the catalyst conversion can keep at the tures will enhance the energy of catalyst to catch the LOHCs, which
initial level, furthermore, we can conclude that the Rh/C and Ru/C finally caused the adsorption limitation rather than the reaction limit.
catalysts have satisfying stability. Besides, a 200-cycle-long test, where Thus, the strong activity loss and competitive effect can be associated
the reaction keep working for 400 h. to Ru/C test is also conducted to towards the adsorption step of LOHCs, which have been reported by
Fig. 5. Activity and selectivity of different reactants under Rh/C and Ru/C catalytic hydrogenation conditions.
BEN = benzene, TOL = toluene, NAP = naphthalene, DPM = dibenzyltoluene.
PYR = pyridine, QUI = quinoline, NEC = N-ethylcarbazole, IND = indole.
5
X. Mei et al. Fuel Processing Technology 265 (2024) 108143
Fig. 6. The hydrogenation reaction by Ru/C and Rh/C catalysts in 5 reaction cycles (a) and 200-cycle-long reaction stability test of Ru/C catalysts.
Fig. 7. The TOF of different compounding LOHCs under Rh/C (a) and Ru/C (b) catalytic hydrogenation conditions.
Fig. 8. The reaction rate of two LOHCs in the TOL-DPM (a) and TOL-QUI (b) compounding system.
researches focused on the kinetics of hydrogenation of LOHCs [46]. LOHCs. However, the adsorption energy is still negative, which supports
Thus, the DFT models are built to combine the reaction activity with our hypothesis that highly active molecules can spontaneously adsorb
microcosmic behaviors of the adsorption step between LOHCs and on the catalyst surface but will not be strongly bound, promoting the
catalysts. cycle of catalytic hydrogenation at the active site. For most fused and
multi-ring molecules, their adsorption energies are low, indicating that
they are difficult to detach after adsorption and thus occupy the active
3.7. The adsorption model between the reactant and catalysts sites of the catalyst. The main reason for the low reaction rates of NEC,
indole, and naphthalene is attributed to the dilution of the reaction
Using first-principles analysis based on DFT, we modeled the substrate by the solvent. In addition, as the number of carbon atoms in
adsorption of different hydrogen storage molecules on the catalyst sur LOHC increases, the adsorption energy from monocyclic aromatic hy
face, the adsorption energy between catalyst and LOHCs is shown in drocarbons to polycyclic and polycyclic compounds gradually decreases,
Table 2. We can conclude that the adsorption energy of benzene, toluene which is consistent with the trend of single LOHC reaction rate. It is
and pyridine on the Rh catalyst surface is higher compared to other
6
X. Mei et al. Fuel Processing Technology 265 (2024) 108143
Table 2 Table 3
The adsorption energy between the LOHC and commercial catalysts. The adsorption energy of reactants and all hydrogenation products.
LOHC 5 wt% Rh/C 5 wt% Ru/C LOHC 5 wt% Rh/C 5 wt% Ru/C
Adsorption energy TOF Adsorption energy TOF Adsorption energy TOF Adsorption energy TOF
(eV) (h− 1) (eV) (h− 1) (eV) (h− 1) (eV) (h− 1)
7
X. Mei et al. Fuel Processing Technology 265 (2024) 108143
References [24] G.-Y. Fan, J. Wu, Mild hydrogenation of quinoline to decahydroquinoline over
rhodium nanoparticles entrapped in aluminum oxy-hydroxide, Catal. Commun. 31
(2013) 81–85.
[1] J. Wristers, Strong acid-catalyzed hydrogenation of aromatics, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
[25] E.G. Shubina, N.S. Filimonov, R.V. Shafigulin, et al., Effect of size of nickel
97 (15) (1975) 4312–4316.
nanoparticles on hydrogenation of benzene, Pet. Chem. 57 (5) (2017) 410–414.
[2] N. Kimbara, J.-P. Charland, M.F. Wilson, Hydrogenation of aromatics in synthetic
[26] H. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, et al., Synthesis of alumina-supported rhsn alloy
crude distillates catalyzed by platinum supported in molecular sieves, Ind. Eng.
nanocatalysts by using Rh@Sn Core–shell nanoparticle precursors for toluene
Chem. Res. 35 (11) (1996) 3874–3883.
catalytic hydrogenation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62 (17) (2023) 6626–6633.
[3] I.P. Fisher, M.F. Wilson, Kinetics and thermodynamics of aromatics hydrogenation
[27] G. Zhou, T. Li, J. Chen, et al., Nano-Pd/CeO2 catalysts for hydrogen storage by
in distillates from Athabasca syncrudes, Energy Fuel 2 (4) (1988) 548–555.
reversible benzene hydrogenation/dehydrogenation reactions, Int. J. Hydrog.
[4] A. Bjelić, M. Grilc, M. Huš, et al., Hydrogenation and hydrodeoxygenation of
Energy 46 (27) (2021) 14540–14555.
aromatic lignin monomers over Cu/C, Ni/C, Pd/C, Pt/C, Rh/C and Ru/C catalysts:
[28] Z. Ma, Y. Yang, Z. Song, et al., Fine-tuning Pt nanoparticle and coordination for
Mechanisms, reaction micro-kinetic modelling and quantitative structure-activity
enhanced catalytic efficiency in microwave-assisted methylcyclohexane
relationships, Chem. Eng. J. 359 (2019) 305–320.
dehydrogenation over Pt/Al2O3 catalysts, Fuel 378 (2024) 132851.
[5] A.B. Jain, P.D. Vaidya, Kinetics of hydrogenation of furfuryl alcohol and
[29] P.M.J. Modisha, J. H, A. Bösmann, P. Wasserscheid, D. Bessarabov, Naphthalene
γ-valerolactone over Ru/C catalyst, Energy Fuel 34 (8) (2020) 9963–9970.
hydrogenation over Mg-doped Pt/Al2O3, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 114 (11) (2018)
[6] I. Bergault, C. Joly-Vuillemin, P. Fouilloux, et al., Modeling of acetophenone
9720–9730.
hydrogenation over a Rh/C catalyst in a slurry airlift reactor, Catal. Today 48 (1)
[30] Y. Wu, H. Yu, Y. Guo, et al., A rare earth hydride supported ruthenium catalyst for
(1999) 161–174.
the hydrogenation of N-heterocycles: boosting the activity via a new hydrogen
[7] A.K. Manal, G.V. Shanbhag, R. Srivastava, Design of a bifunctional catalyst by
transfer path and controlling the stereoselectivity, Chem. Sci. 10 (45) (2019)
alloying Ni with Ru-supported H-beta for selective hydrodeoxygenation of
10459–10465.
bisphenol a and polycarbonate plastic waste, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 338 (2023)
[31] J. Escobar, J.A. Colín-Luna, M.C. Barrera, Thioresistant PdPt/Al/SBA-15 for
123021.
naphthalene hydrogenation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 63 (3) (2024) 1248–1260.
[8] Y. Tian, L. Guo, C. Qiao, et al., Dynamics-driven tailoring of sub-nanometric Pt-Ni
[32] K.J. Li, H.L. An, P.J. Yan, et al., Hydrogenation of toluene to methyl cyclohexane
bimetals confined in hierarchical zeolite for catalytic hydrodeoxygenation, Appl.
over PtRh bimetallic nanoparticle-encaged hollow mesoporous silica catalytic
Catal. B Environ. 336 (2023) 122945.
nanoreactors, ACS Omega 6 (8) (2021) 5846–5855.
[9] Q. Pei, J. Yu, G. Qiu, et al., Fabrication of ultrafine metastable Ru-B alloy for
[33] Y. Qin, X. Bai, N-doped graphitized carbon supported Co@Ru core–shell bimetallic
catalytic hydrogenation of NEC at room temperature, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 336
catalyst for hydrogen storage of N-ethylcarbazole, Cat. Sci. Technol. 12 (9) (2022)
(2023) 122947.
2829–2836.
[10] W. Xue, H. Liu, B. Zhao, et al., Single Rh1Co catalyst enabling reversible
[34] B. Wang, P.Y. Li, Q. Dong, et al., Bimetallic NiCo/AC catalysts with a strong
hydrogenation and dehydrogenation of N-ethylcarbazole for hydrogen storage,
coupling effect for high-efficiency hydrogenation of N-ethylcarbazole, ACS Appl.
Appl. Catal. B Environ. 327 (2023) 122453.
Energy Mater. 6 (3) (2023) 1741–1752.
[11] W. Xue, B. Zhao, H. Liu, et al., Ultralow Pd bimetallic catalysts boost (de)
[35] H. Yu, X. Yang, Y. Wu, et al., Bimetallic Ru-Ni/TiO2 catalysts for hydrogenation of
hydrogenation for reversible H2 storage, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 343 (2024)
N-ethylcarbazole: role of TiO2 crystal structure, J. Energy Chem. 40 (2020)
123574.
188–195.
[12] L. Ge, Y. Zhu, M. Qiu, et al., A highly active Pd clusters hosted by magnesium
[36] L. Zhu, J. Zheng, C. Yu, et al., Effect of the thermal treatment temperature of RuNi
hydroxide nanosheets promoting hydrogen storage, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy
bimetallic nanocatalysts on their catalytic performance for benzene hydrogenation,
333 (2023) 122793.
RSC Adv. 6 (16) (2016) 13110–13119.
[13] J. Guo, L. Xing, Z. Hua, et al., Optimization of compressed hydrogen gas cycling
[37] G. Moretti, W.M.H. Sachtler, Characterization and catalysis of Pt-Cu clusters in
test system based on multi-stage storage and self-pressurized method, Int. J.
NaY, J. Catal. 115 (1) (1989) 205–216.
Hydrog. Energy 41 (36) (2016) 16306–16315.
[38] R. Atsumi, K. Kobayashi, C. Xieli, et al., Effects of steam on toluene hydrogenation
[14] J. Xu, F. Huang, X. Chen, et al., Design and optimization of cryogenic supercritical
over a Ni catalyst, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 590 (2020) 117374.
hydrogen storage system coupled with mixed refrigerant and gas expansion cycle,
[39] S. Furukawa, Y. Matsunami, I. Hamada, et al., Remarkable Enhancement in
Appl. Therm. Eng. 243 (2024) 122606.
Hydrogenation Ability by Phosphidation of Ruthenium: specific Surface Structure
[15] S. Park, M.M. Abdullah, K. Seong, et al., Kinetic analysis of dibenzyltoluene
having Unique Ru Ensembles, ACS Catal. 8 (9) (2018) 8177–8181.
hydrogenation on commercial Ru/Al2O3 catalyst for liquid organic hydrogen
[40] V. Mozhiarasi, T.S. Natarajan, Bael fruit shell–derived activated carbon adsorbent:
carrier, Chem. Eng. J. 474 (2023) 145743.
effect of surface charge of activated carbon and type of pollutants for improved
[16] R.V. Kazantsev, N.A. Gaidai, N.V. Nekrasov, et al., Kinetics of benzene and toluene
adsorption capacity, Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 14 (7) (2024) 8761–8774.
hydrogenation on a Pt/TiO2 catalyst, Kinet. Catal. 44 (4) (2003) 529–535.
[41] V. Gómez-Serrano, C.M. González-Garcia, M.L. González-Martin, Nitrogen
[17] A.K. Neyestanaki, H. Backman, P. Mäki-Arvela, et al., Kinetics and modeling of o-
adsorption isotherms on carbonaceous materials. Comparison of BET and Langmuir
xylene hydrogenation over Pt/γ-Al2O3 catalyst, Chem. Eng. J. 91 (2) (2003)
surface areas, Powder Technol. 116 (1) (2001) 103–108.
271–278.
[42] O. Bezkrovnyi, M. Vorokhta, M. Pawlyta, et al., In situ observation of highly
[18] X. Ye, Y. An, G. Xu, Kinetics of 9-ethylcarbazole hydrogenation over Raney-Ni
oxidized Ru species in Ru/CeO2 catalyst under propane oxidation, J. Mater. Chem.
catalyst for hydrogen storage, J. Alloys Compd. 509 (1) (2011) 152–156.
A 10 (31) (2022) 16675–16684.
[19] F. Sotoodeh, K.J. Smith, Kinetics of hydrogen uptake and release from
[43] J. Ma, L. Yin, L. Ling, et al., The formation of high energy density fuel via the
heteroaromatic compounds for hydrogen storage, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (3)
hydrogenation of naphthalene over Ni catalyst: the combined DFT and
(2010) 1018–1026.
microkinetic analysis, Fuel 333 (2023) 126307.
[20] Z.Y. Ren Wang, Shijin Li, Research of furan: kinetics of the hydrogenation of furan,
[44] F.E. Massoth, S.C. Kim, Kinetics of the HDN of Quinoline under Vapor-phase
Chin. Sci. Bull. 9 (14) (1958) 434–435.
Conditions, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42 (5) (2003) 1011–1022.
[21] N. Heublein, M. Stelzner, T. Sattelmayer, Hydrogen storage using liquid organic
[45] F. Sun, Y. An, L. Lei, et al., Identification of the starting reaction position in the
carriers: Equilibrium simulation and dehydrogenation reactor design, Int. J.
hydrogenation of (N-ethyl)carbazole over Raney-Ni, J. Energy Chem. 24 (2) (2015)
Hydrog. Energy 45 (46) (2020) 24902–24916.
219–224.
[22] C. Wan, Y. An, F. Chen, et al., Kinetics of N-ethylcarbazole hydrogenation over a
[46] K.M. Eblagon, K. Tam, S.C.E. Tsang, Comparison of catalytic performance of
supported Ru catalyst for hydrogen storage, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 (17) (2013)
supported ruthenium and rhodium for hydrogenation of 9-ethylcarbazole for
7065–7069.
hydrogen storage applications, Energy Environ. Sci. 5 (9) (2012) 8621–8630.
[23] Y.A. Chudakov, V.D. Stytsenko, G.O. Zasypalov, et al., The influence of ruthenium
[47] K. Morawa Eblagon, K. Tam, K.M.K. Yu, et al., Study of Catalytic Sites on
nanoparticle size on the activity of benzene hydrogenation catalysts, Chem.
Ruthenium for Hydrogenation of N-ethylcarbazole: Implications of Hydrogen
Technol. Fuels Oils 56 (2) (2020) 136–143.
Storage via Reversible Catalytic Hydrogenation, J. Phys. Chem. C 114 (21) (2010)
9720–9730.