Scribd
Upload
5 views

Assignment 1

Uploaded by

duaali11122
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views

Assignment 1

Uploaded by

duaali11122
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Assignment – MGT111 Student I’D: BC230202357

Questions for Analysis:


Question 1: Analyze the scenario from the perspective of Weber’s theory of bureaucracy and
identify three such instances when this theory’s principles have been disregarded. Link those
instances to specific violated principles of Weber’s theory in the table provided below.
Remember correct identification of the violated rule carries marks, not reproducing the
information from the scenario (the information in the columns of the table will only determine
that you are able to align the relevant information of the scenario with the correct challenged
principle.

Solution:
Scenario Instance Rule Disregarded Using Lens of Weber’s
Theory of Bureaucracy
1. Ignoring the Rule through the Perspective of Mr. Talha's frequent denials without good
Weber's Theory of Bureaucracy justification demonstrate a disrespect for
Weber's principle of merit-based promotion,
even though he meets all the criteria listed in
the Promotion Procedures Manual.

2. The promotion process is not open and Despite the existence of established
honest. requirements in the Promotion Procedures
Manual, Mr. Hamza fails to present explicit
reasons for denying Mr. Talha's promotion,
disregarding Weber's emphasis on clear,
formal norms and procedures.

3. Mr. Hamza did not offer personalized For successful leadership growth inside the
coaching or identify areas that needed bureaucratic framework, it is vital to adhere to
development. Weber's principle of specialization. However,
Mr. Hamza fails in his obligation to offer
targeted coaching and feedback to improve
Mr. Talha's talents.

Question 2:
Weber also distinguished between three types of authority, what kind of authorities are being
possessed by Mr. Talha and Mr. Hamza respectively from Weber’s point of view?
Solution:

 Traditional authority is held by Mr. Talha. His impeccable track record of service,
dedication to efficiency and safety, and the established norms and processes inside the
bureaucratic structure all contribute to his authority.

 Authority Granted to Mr. Hamza by the Legal-Rational Framework of Bureaucracy, Mr.


Hamza's position as department supervisor grants him authority. His formal position,
together with his adherence to established procedures and norms, gives him authority,
not his character or family history.

You might also like