0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views20 pages

TC202 Lecture 15

Uploaded by

hassanyaseen615
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views20 pages

TC202 Lecture 15

Uploaded by

hassanyaseen615
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Signals and Systems TC-202

LECTURE # 15
TOPICS:
• LAPLACE TRANSFORM
• EXAMPLES
• REGION OF CONVERGENCE

INSTRUCTOR: DR. SUNDUS ALI, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,


DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, NED UET
2
Laplace Transform

Given a function ( ) defined for values of the variable > then the Laplace
transform of ( ), denoted by: L f (t )  

is defined to be:
L  f (t )   e  st f (t ) dt
t 0

Where is a variable whose values are chosen so as to ensure that the semi-infinite
integral converges.
3
Laplace Transform

The Laplace transform is an expression involving variable s and can be denoted


as such by . That is:
F ( s )  L  f (t )

It is said that ( ) and ( ) form a transform pair.

This means that if ( ) is the Laplace transform of f (t) then f (t) is the inverse
Laplace transform of F (s).

That is: f (t )  L1 F ( s )


4
Definition

 The Laplace transform is a linear operator that switched a function ( ) to ( ).


 Specifically:

where:
 Go from time argument with real input to a complex angular frequency input which is
complex.
 There are two governing factors that determine whether Laplace transforms can be
used:
 ( ) must be at least piecewise continuous for ≥
 | ( )| ≤ where M and γ are constants
5
Continuity and Boundedness

 Since the general form of the Laplace transform is:

it makes sense that f(t) must be at least piecewise continuous for t ≥ 0.


 If f(t) were very nasty, the integral would not be computable
 This criterion also follows directly from the general definition:

 If f(t) is not bounded by then the integral will not converge


6
Laplace Transform Theory

•General Theory

•Example

•Convergence
7
Example 1

 Consider the following improper integral. 


 e st dt
0

 We can evaluate this integral as follows:


st b
 b e 1
0
st st
e dt  lim  e dt  lim
b  0 b  s
 lim e sb  1
s b 
 
0
 Note that if = , then = . Thus the following

st 1
 e dt   , if s  0; and
two cases hold: 0 s

 e st dt diverges, if s  0.
0
8
Example 2

 Consider the following improper integral. 


 st cos tdt
0
 We can evaluate this integral using integration by
 b
parts: st cos tdt  lim
 0 b   0
st cos tdt
b
 lim  st sin t s sin tdt 
b
 
b  
 0 0 

 lim st sin t
b 
b
0
 s cos t
b
0

 Since this limit diverges, so does the original  lim sb sin b  s cos b  1 
integral. b 
9
Example 3

 Let ( ) = for . Then the Laplace transform ( ) of is:



L 1    e  st dt
0
b
 lim  e  st dt
b  0
b
e  st
  lim
b  s
0

1
 , s0
s
10
Example 4

 Let ( ) = for . Then the Laplace transform ( ) of is:



  
L e at
0
e  st e at dt
b
 lim  e  ( s  a ) t dt
b  0

( s a )t b
e
  lim
b  sa 0

1
 , sa
sa
11
Example 5

 b
 Let ( ) = sin( ) for . F ( s )  L sin( at )    e  st
sin atdt  lim  e  st sin atdt
0 b 0

  st b s b  st 
 Using integration by parts  lim   (e cos at ) / a   e cos at 
b 
 0 a 0 
twice, the Laplace
1 s b
transform ( ) of is found   lim   e  st cos at 
as follows: a a b   0 
1 s  b s b 
  lim (e  st sin at ) / a   e  st sin at 
a a b   0 a 0 
1 s2 a
  2 F (s)  F (s)  2 2
, s0
a a s a
12
Example 6

 Let ( ) = − ( ) for .
 Then by linearity of the Laplace transform, and using results of
previous examples, the Laplace transform F(s) of f is:
F ( s )  L{ f ( t )}

 L 5 e  2 t  3 sin( 4 t ) 
 
 5 L e  2 t  3 L  sin( 4 t ) 
5 12
  2 , s0
s  2 s  16
13
Region of Convergence

• Example: x1 t   e  at u (t ) where a
is an arbitrary real or complex
number.
• Solution:
   ROC
 at  st  at  st ( s  a ) t
X 1 (s)  e u (t )e dt   e e dt   e dt • The ROC can be visualized
 0 0 using s-plane plot shown

 1  ( s  a )t  1 ( s  a ) above. The shaded region

sa
e 
sa
e  
 1  ??? defines the values of s for which
0
the Laplace transform exists.
This converges only if: The ROC is a very importance
Re{s  a}  0  Re{s}   Re{a} property of a two-sided
Laplace transform.
and we can write:
1
X 1 (s)  when Re{s}   Re{a}
sa
14
Region of Convergence

• Example: x 2 t   e  at u (t )
• Solution:

 at
X 2 (s)  e u (t )e  st dt

0 0 ROC
 at  st ( s  a ) t
   e e dt   e dt • The transform is the same but
  the ROC is different. This is a
0
1  ( s  a )t 1 major difference from the

sa
e 
sa

1  e ( s a )    ??? Fourier transform – we need

both the transform and the
This converges only if: ROC to uniquely specify the
Re{s  a}  0  Re{s}   Re{a} signal. The FT does not have
an ROC issue.
and we can write:
1
X (s)  when Re{s}   Re{a}
sa
15
Region of Convergence

• A rational transform: N (s)


where N ( s )  b 0  b1 s  b 2 s 2  ... D ( s )  1  a 1 s  a 2 s 2  ...
H (s) 
D (s)
• The zeroes of the polynomial, N(s), are called zeroes of H(s). The zeroes of the polynomial, D(s), are
called poles of H(s).
zero poles
• Example: xt   3e 2 t u (t )  2e  t u (t )

X ( s )   ( 3e 2 t  2 e  t ) e  st dt
0
 
( s  2 )t
 3 e dt  2  e  ( s 1) t dt
0 0
 
3 1 st term : Re{ s}  2
2
 
s2 0 2 nd term : Re{ s}   1
s 1 0
3 2 s7 • Does this signal have a
   Re{ s}  2 Fourier transform?
s  2 s  1 ( s  2 )( s  1)
16
Properties of Region of Convergence

• There are some signals, particularly two-sided signals such as x(t )  et and x (t )  e j0t that do not have
Laplace transforms.
• The ROC typically assumes a few simple shapes. It is usually the intersection of lines parallel to the
imaginary axis. Why?
• For rational transforms, the ROC does not include any poles. Why?
• If x(t ) is of finite duration and absolutely integrable, its ROC is the complete s-plane.

X 2 (s)   x(t )u(t )e st dt

T2 T2
st
  x(t )e dt   if  x(t ) dt  
T1 T1
17
Properties of ROC

• If x(t ) is right-sided, and if 0 is in the ROC, all points to the right of 0 are in the ROC. If x(t ) is left-sided,
points to the left of 0 are in the ROC.
• If x(t ) is two-sided, then the ROC consists of the intersection of a left-sided and right-sided version of x(t ) ,
which is a strip in the s-plane:
18
Example of a two-sided signal

x(t )  e
bt
 e bt u (t )  e bt u (t ) 1 1 1 st term : Re s   b
X (s)   
sb sb 2 nd term : Re s    b
 2b
 ( b  0 ) with ROC below
s2  b2

• If b < 0, the Laplace transform does not exist.


• Hence, the ROC plays an integral role in the Laplace transform.
19
ROC for rational transforms

• Since the ROC cannot include poles, the ROC is bounded by the poles for a rational transform.
• If x(t) is right-sided, the ROC begins to the right of the rightmost pole. If x(t) is left-sided, the ROC begins
to the left of the leftmost pole. If x(t) is double-sided, the ROC will be the intersection of these two
regions.

• If the ROC includes the j-axis, then the Fourier transform of x(t) exists. Hence, the Fourier transform can
be considered to be the evaluation of the Laplace transform along the j-axis.
20
Example

( s  3)
• Consider the Laplace transform: X ( s ) 
( s  1)(s  2)
• Can we uniquely determine the original signal, x(t)?
• There are three possible ROCs:

• ROC III: only if x(t) is right-sided.


• ROC I: only if x(t) is left-sided.
• ROC II: only if x(t) has a Fourier transform.

You might also like