Collapse of Compacted Clayey Sand
Collapse of Compacted Clayey Sand
ABSTRACT: Compacted soils wetted under load can both swell and collapse
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universiti Teknologi Mara on 09/01/24. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
(subside) depending on their condition and the magnitude of the vertical overbur-
den stress. One-dimensional compression tests were conducted to clarify the in-
fluences of compaction method, compaction water content, relative compaction,
vertical stress level, and load-wetting sequence on post-compaction wetting-in-
duced volume changes in a moderately plastic clayey sand. Compaction method
and load-wet sequence had only a minor effect on wetting-induced collapse. The
double-odometer test was judged to be sufficiently accurate for use in evaluating
wetting-induced collapse. Both swelling and collapse were reduced or eliminated
by compacting the soil at water contents on the wet side of the line of optimums
for impact compaction. Collapse, but not swelling, could also be reduced by com-
pacting the soil to high levels of relative compaction. By plotting isograms of
volume changes in the compaction water content-relative compaction space, com-
binations resulting in no wetting-induced volume change were identified for var-
ious vertical stress levels corresponding to the values existing in large fills and
embankments.
INTRODUCTION
1. Four conditions are necessary for collapse to occur in a soil (Barden et al.
1973; Mitchell 1976):
a. An open, partially unstable, partially saturated fabric.
b. A high enough total stress so that the structure is metastable.
c. A sufficiently large soil suction or the presence of a bonding or ce-
menting agent that stabilizes the soil in the partly-saturated condition.
d. The addition of water to the soil which reduces the soil suction or soft-
ens or destroys the bonding agent, thereby causing shear failures at the inter-
aggregate or intergranular contacts.
2. For any given set of conditions, the amount of collapse generally decreases
'Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Arch. Engrg., Univ. of Miami, P.O. Box 248294,
Coral Gables, FL 33124.
2
Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Washington State Univ., Pullman,
WA 99164.
3
Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843.
Note. Discussion open until February 1, 1990. To extend the closing date one
month, a written request must be filed with the ASCE Manager of Journals. The
manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on July
2, 1987. This paper is part of the Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 115,
No. 9, September, 1989. ©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9410/89/0009-1252/$1.00 + $.15
per page. Paper No. 23860.
1252
soaking above which no collapse will occur. For some soils the critical water
content is above standard Proctor optimum water content (Hilf 1956; Barden et
al. 1969).
5. There is a critical degree of saturation for a given soil above which neg-
ligible collapse will occur regardless of the magnitude of the pre-wetting over-
burden pressure (Mishu 1963; Booth 1977).
1. The significance of the laboratory test procedures with regard to the con-
clusions reached in the evaluation of collapse potential. Important test procedure
considerations include the method of compaction used to prepare test specimens
and the load-wetting sequence used for the collapse test.
2. The influence of the compaction parameters such as relative compaction
and compaction water content on the amount of wetting-induced collapse exhib-
ited by clayey soils compacted to usual unit weights and subjected to stress levels
typically encountered in deep fills and high embankments. The objective is to
identify the critical compaction parameters tiiat can be controlled by the fill de-
signer in order to minimize potential wetting-induced collapse.
1253
*™™-™- P r o c t o r I m p a c t
— —- S c a l e d - D o w n I m p a c t
Upper Curves: Mod. Proctor Energy 100
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universiti Teknologi Mara on 09/01/24. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
1.90
1.80
>-
CXI
a
1,70
1.60-
10 15 20
MOLDING WATER CONTENT (%)
Fig. 1, compaction with the special hammers produced lower maximum dry
densities than with the conventional compaction hammers. This result is ex-
pected because more friction per unit volume of soil is developed during
compaction into the odometer rings as compared to compaction into con-
ventional compaction molds (due to the higher ratio of inside surface area
to volume of soil for the odometer rings). However, the moisture-density
relationships developed for the special hammers are essentially identical in
form and have approximately the same line of optimums as for the conven-
tional hammers. In this paper all references to relative compaction will refer
to maximum dry density produced by the modified Proctor procedure de-
scribed in test method ASTM D 1557. The term "line of optimums" (illus-
trated in Fig. 1) will likewise refer to the line connecting coordinates of
optimum water content and maximum dry density for moisture density re-
lationships produced by the standard tests (ASTM D 698 and D 1557). For
the soil tested, the line of optimums corresponded to a constant degree of
saturation, S, of approximately 80%.
In a double odometer collapse test, one of a pair of identically compacted
specimens is loaded in the as-compacted condition to successively increasing
1254
+4
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universiti Teknologi Mara on 09/01/24. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
+2
0
I—
CO -2
-4
I -6
-8
Relative Compaction = 80%
-10 Molding Water Content = 10%
-12 Impact Compaction
-M
' ' i i i i i i I i t I i i 111
10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000
OVERBURDEN PRESSURE (KPA)
1255
O Soaked-After-Loading
+8-
+6-
+4-
C/0 +2 -
0 —
-2"
-4-
-6-
-8 "
-10 -
JjJ- _J_ I i i 111
10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000
OVERBURDEN PRESSURE (KPA)
FIG. 3. Comparison of Volumetric Strain between Double Odometer and Soaked-
After-Loading Tests—Static Compaction (Relative Compaction = 80%, Molding
Water Content = 13%)
as the two curves approach each other. This characteristic can be explained
in terms of the prestress induced in the soil during the compaction process
and will be discussed in a later section of the paper.
The double odometer tests for this test program were performed using
Bishop-type loading units and 75 mm diameter by 20 mm thick fixed rings.
In order to facilitate the direct determination of the influence of dry density
and molding water content on the characteristics of collapse for this soil, the
double odometer tests were performed on pairs of identically compacted
specimens prepared at selected water contents (7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22%), and
the applied energy was varied as necessary to produce values of dry density
corresponding to 80, 85, 90, and 95% relative compaction.
+10 O Soaked-After-Loading
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universiti Teknologi Mara on 09/01/24. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
LU
3
LU
+8
^~*
E-9
LU
LL.
+6
LU
^ +4
«r =a
I—
00 o;
2:
—1
+?
I > o;
1—
CO
(J
cc
\—
III 0 -2
VOLU
I—
LU
-4
•sz
=3
_l
0
-6
> -8
-10
J I ' I1 '1 I J_ J 1 I I III I
10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000
OVERBURDEN PRESSURE (KPA)
FIG. 4. Comparison of Collapse between Double Odometer and Soaked-After-
Loading Tests—Kneading Compaction (Relative Compaction = 80%, Molding Water
Content = 13%)
5 + ioi- V IMPACT
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universiti Teknologi Mara on 09/01/24. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
O KNEADING
y +8-
LlJ
3 +6
t +4
I 0 &=-=r-^-
-2
-H
-6 -R.C.=80%, w=10%
-8 -R.C.=85%, w=16
-10
J I I I I I.I I _L J„ ' • i i i I
1258
+16 - A w - 7%
+14 - 0 w = 10%
a w = u%
+12
^ w = 16%
LU
+10
+8 Note: Tests a t w => 19% and 22% predicted
negligible volumetric s t r a i n a t a l l
+6 overburden pressures.
+4 S ^ v .
+2 ^^it^.
0 ~~^ V ~~^ V > H
TC^-W jy" ^
-2 - \ ^ V y ^ V ^
-4 No^v sr
-6
o ^NH^T
-8 \ ^ ® ^ /
-10
i 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 P~~-v>,
10 20 50 100 200 1000 2000
OVERBURDEN PRESSURE (KPA)
1259
UJ +10 h
I +8 -
t +6
+
£ 2
& o
o
5 -2
-6
Note: Tests at w = 19% predicted negligible
-8 volumetric strain at ail overburden
pressures.
•10
J ' ' ' i) iI _L _L I » i i i I.
10 20 50 100 200 1000 2000
OVERBURDEN PRESSURE (KPA)
FIG. 7. Effect of Molding Water Content on Volumetric Strain Difference versus
Overburden Pressure Curve at Relative Compaction = 85% (Impact Compaction)
Relative Compaction
The influence on collapse behavior of the second major compaction pa-
rameter, relative compaction, is shown in Fig. 8. The curves show that for
the soil tested in this study, increasing the relative compaction not only sub-
stantially reduced the wetting-induced collapse potential at any overburden
pressure in the collapse region, it also increased the critical overburden pres-
sure at which the collapse was a maximum. However, unlike the technique
of using increased compaction water content to reduce collapse, the use of
increased relative compaction resulted in significantly increased wetting-caused
swelling of the soil.
As is frequently the case with compaction parameters, selection of values
to optimize a particular engineering property or behavior can result in less
than desirable characteristics for other behavior. In order to illustrate how
1260
UJ
!_>
REN
+8
HI
u_
1—1
+b
Q
+4
z
ss +2
1—
CO 0
<. >
cc -2
h-
LU
=D
-4
-J
CD -6
>
-8
-10
I ' I t-JULuJ U 1 I L_L_L-UJ
10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000
OVERBURDEN PRESSURE (KPA)
FIG. 8. Effect of Relative Compaction on Volumetric Strain Difference versus
Overburden Pressure Curve at Molding Water Content = 10% (Impact Compac-
tion)
the optimal values of compaction water content and relative compaction could
be selected to minimize both collapse and swelling, isograms of wetting-
caused volume changes can be plotted as in Fig. 9. The isograms of the
figure are for the net volumetric strain differences accompanying wetting of
the compacted soil at an overburden stress level of 400 kPa.
Two important characteristics of the collapse behavior of the expansive
clayey sand are illustrated in Fig. 9 and similar plots made for other over-
burden pressures by Lawton (1986). First, in all of these plots the isograms
corresponding to the smallest measurable amount of wetting-induced col-
lapse are confined to a region representing compaction water contents dry
of the line of optimums. In other words, no isogram representing wetting-
induced collapse crosses the line of optimums. Because the line of optimums
also represents approximately a line of constant degree of saturation, it can
be stated (for this soil) that no post-construction wetting-induced collapse
will occur if the soil is compacted to a density and water content for which
the degree of saturation is greater than or equal to about 80 percent.
The second important characteristic illustrated by the isograms of Fig. 9
is that there is a region in the compaction water content-relative compaction
space where neither collapse nor swelling will occur as the soil is wetted
under load. The location of this no volume change region depends on the
1261
LINE OF OPTIMUMS
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universiti Teknologi Mara on 09/01/24. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
-1,90
1,80
-1.70
1,60
10 12 14 16 18 20 22
MOLDING WATER CONTENT (%)
FIG. 9. Isograms of Volumetric Strain Difference as Function of Relative Com-
paction and Molding Water Content at Overburden Pressure = 400 kPa (Impact
Compaction)
1262
&•«
Q_
O
I
UJ
ce
•a:
compression tests. The compactive prestress depends on the form and amount
of mechanical energy used to compact the soil. The magnitude of the com-
pactive prestress can be estimated using the graphical techniques used to find
the preconsolidation pressure of undisturbed samples of natural soils. That
the compactive prestress exhibited by the as-compacted soil is also the ver-
tical stress at which the potential for maximum wetting-induced collapse ex-
ists is apparent from Fig. 2. In this figure the compactive prestress of the
as-compacted specimen is roughly the value of the vertical stress where a
tangent to the nearly horizontal early part of the compression curve intersects
the tangent drawn for the steeply sloping straight-line late part of the curve.
Alternatively, the compactive prestress can be estimated as a value of ver-
tical stress slightly larger than the value at which the rate of curvature of
the compressive curve is a maximum (Casagrande technique). Using either
of these approaches, the compactive prestress of the soil of Fig. 2 is ap-
proximately 800 kPa. Since the slope of the compression curve for the wet-
ted specimen is invariably flatter than the slope of the steepest part of the
compression curve of the as-compacted specimen, it is apparent that upon
soaking the maximum collapse as predicted by the double-odometer tech-
nique for a relative compaction of 80% and a molding water content of 10%
occurs at the vertical stress identified above as the compaction prestress. It
is also clear from Fig. 2 that allowing the soil to swell as it takes up water
effectively eliminates the compactive prestress.
That the maximum collapse potential for a given compacted condition ex-
ists at an overburden stress equal to the compactive prestress can be ex-
plained in terms of the overburden stress, dry density, and degree of satu-
ration at the time water is added to the specimen. At overburden stresses
lower than the compactive prestress, very little compression takes place in
the as-compacted soil due to the overburden pressure and the dry density
and degree of saturation at all values of vertical stress are approximately the
same. Therefore, the potential for wetting-induced collapse increases with
increasing vertical stress. However, if the overburden stress exceeds the level
of compactive prestress, more compression occurs due to the application of
the overburden pressure, resulting in an increased dry density and a higher
degree of saturation. Both these characteristics reduce the potential for wet-
ting-induced collapse. At some value of overburden stress the soil is com-
pressed to a degree of saturation greater than critical saturation and there is
no effect when water is added.
If the relationship between compactive prestress and overburden stress for
maximum collapse is accepted, the relative values of the maximum collapse
for specimens compacted by kneading, impact, and static compaction shown
in Fig. 5 indicate that the prestressing effect of the compaction method in-
creases in the order kneading, impact and static. Although the differences
are small for the moderately plastic soil used in this study, this result may
support the view held by many engineers concerning the efficiency of static
compaction. That is, more energy is required to compact a cohesive soil to
1264
1265
The applicability of these results and conclusions to other soils is not en-
tirely clear. It can be stated with reasonable certainty that other soils pos-
sessing similar qualities will likely behave in a similar manner. Because a
wide variety of compacted soils ranging from sands to clays have been de-
scribed in the literature as collapsing under certain conditions, the authors
believe the results and conclusions presented in this paper regarding collapse
are applicable in some degree to all compacted soils, although some minor
modifications are needed to apply some of them to nonexpansive soils. Those
results and conclusions discussed in terms of swelling, of course, apply only
to expansive soils. Further study regarding the types of compacted soils most
susceptible to collapse is definitely needed; research in this area is currently
being conducted by the second author.
APPENDIX I. REFERENCES
Barden, L., Madedor, A. O., and Sides, G. F. (1969). "Volume change character-
istics of unsaturated clay." J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 95(1), 33-51.
Barden, L., McGown, A., and Collins, K. (1973). "The collapse mechanism in
partly saturated soil." Engrg. Geol., 7, 49-60.
Booth, A. R. (1977). "Collapse settlement in compacted soils." CSIR Research Re-
port 324, NITRR Bulletin 13, Pretoria, South Africa.
Cox, D. W. (1978). "Volume change of compacted clay fill." Proc. of Conference
on Clay Fills, Institution of Civil Engineers, London, Nov., 79-87.
Hilf, J. W. (1956). "An investigation of pore-water pressure in compacted cohesive
soil." Technical Memorandum 654, U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Re-
clamation, Denver, Colo.
Holtz, W. G. (1948). "The determination of limits for the control of placement mois-
ture in high rolled earth dams." Proc, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 1240-1248.
Justo, J. L., Delgado, A., and Ruiz, J. (1984). "The influence of stress-path in the
collapse-swelling of soils at the laboratory." Proc. of the Fifth International Con-
ference on Expansive Soils, Adelaide, South Australia, May, 67-71.
Lawton, E. C. (1986). "Wetting-induced collapse in compacted soil," thesis pre-
sented to Washington State University, at Pullman, Wash., in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Mishu, L. P. (1963). "Collapse in one-dimensional compression of compacted clay
on wetting," thesis presented to Purdue University, at West Lafayette, Ind., in
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
Mitchell, J. K. (1976). "Fabric, structure, and property relationships." Fundamentals
of Soils Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., 222-252.
Seed, H. B., and Chan, C. K. (1959). "Structure and strength characteristics of
compacted clays." J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, Oct., 87-128.
Witsman, G. R., and Lovell, C. W. (1979). "The effect of compaction prestress on
compacted shale compressibility." Report No. FHWA/IN/JHRP-79/16, Purdue
Univ., West Lafayette, Ind., Sept.
1266
S = degree of saturation;
w = molding (compaction) water content; and
^voi = volumetric strain.
i,
ii
•k
1267