Westlaw Asia Delivery Summary
Request made by : NOVUS IP USER
Request made on : Wednesday, 11 December, 2024 at 21:32
HKT
Client ID : insvkm-1
Search : (Citation("(1956) 2 ALL ER 121"))
Delivery selection : Search Results
Number of documents delivered : 1
Page1
Status: Positive or Neutral Judicial Treatment
J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw
Court of Appeal
20 March 1956
Case Analysis
Where Reported [1956] 1 W.L.R. 461; [1956] 2 All E.R. 121; [1956] 1 Lloyd's Rep.
392; [1956] 3 WLUK 82; (1956) 100 S.J. 317;
Case Digest Subject: Contracts
Other related subjects: Negligence
Keywords: Breach of contract; Exclusion clauses; Negligence
Summary: Exemption clause
Abstract: Per Denning, L.J.: "These exempting clauses are
nowadays all held to be subject to the overriding proviso that they
only avail to exempt a party when he is carrying out his contract, not
when he is deviating from it or is guilty of a breach which goes to the
root of it. . . . The essence of the contract by a warehouseman is
that he will store the goods in the contractual place and deliver them
on demand to the bailor or his order. If he stores them in a different
place, or if he consumes or destroys them instead of storing them,
or if he sells them, or delivers them without excuse to somebody
else, he is guilty of a breach which goes to the root of the contract
and he cannot rely on the exempting clause. But if he should
happen to damage them by some momentary piece of inadvertence,
then he is able to rely on the exempting clause; because negligence
by itself, without more, is not a breach which goes to the root of the
contract any more than non-payment by itself is such a breach. I
would not like to say, however, that negligence can never go to the
root of the contract. If a warehouseman were to handle the goods so
roughly as to warrant the inference that he was reckless and
indifferent to their safety, he would be guilty of a breach going to the
root of the contract and could not rely on the exempting clause. . . .
Another thing to remember about these exempting clauses is that in
the ordinary way the burden is on the bailee to bring himself within
the exception. A bailor, by pleading and presenting his case
properly, can always put on the bailee the burden of proof. In the
case of non-delivery, for instance, all he need plead is the contract
and a failure to deliver on demand. That puts on the bailee the
burden of proving either loss without his fault (which, of course,
would be a complete answer at common law) or, if it was due to his
fault, it was a fault from which he is excused by the exempting
clause. Likewise, with goods which are returned by the bailee in a
damaged condition, the burden is on him to show that the damage
was done without his fault: or that, if fault there was, it was excused
by the exempting clause. Nothing else will suffice. But where the
only charge made in the pleadings - or the only reasonable
inference on the facts - is that the damage was due to negligence
and nothing more, then the bailee can rely on the exempting clause
without more ado."A wholesale factor delivered to a firm of
warehousemen eight barrels of orange juice for storage and
received a landing account containing conditions which included the
London lighterage clause exempting the warehousemen from
liability for loss occasioned by their negligence. The barrels when
Page2
collected from the warehouse were found to be damaged. In an
action by the warehousemen for storage charges, the factor
counterclaimed for damages for breach of an implied term of a
contract of bailment to take reasonable care.
Held, although the warehousemen were guilty of negligence they
were protected by the exemption clause. (Alderslade v Hendon
Laundry Ltd [1945] K.B. 189, [1945] 1 WLUK 45 applied; Woolmer v
Delmer Price [1955] 1 Q.B. 291, [1955] 1 WLUK 438 distinguished).
Judge: Denning LJ; Morris LJ; Parker LJ
Significant Cases Cited Woolmer v Delmer Price
[1955] 1 Q.B. 291; [1955] 2 W.L.R. 329; [1955] 1 All E.R. 377;
[1955] 1 WLUK 438; (1955) 99 S.J. 112; QBD; 1955-01-13
Alderslade v Hendon Laundry Ltd
[1945] K.B. 189; [1945] 1 All E.R. 244; [1945] 1 WLUK 45; CA;
1945-01-24
All Cases Cited Woolmer v Delmer Price
[1955] 1 Q.B. 291; [1955] 2 W.L.R. 329; [1955] 1 All E.R. 377;
[1955] 1 WLUK 438; (1955) 99 S.J. 112; QBD; 1955-01-13
Pyrene Co Ltd v Scindia Steam Navigation Co Ltd
[1954] 2 Q.B. 402; [1954] 2 W.L.R. 1005; [1954] 2 All E.R. 158;
[1954] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 321; [1954] 4 WLUK 53; (1954) 98 S.J. 354;
QBD; 1954-04-14
Smeaton Hanscomb & Co v Sassoon I Setty Son & Co (No.1)
[1953] 1 W.L.R. 1468; [1953] 2 All E.R. 1471; [1953] 2 Lloyd's Rep.
580; [1953] 12 WLUK 3; (1953) 97 S.J. 862; QBD; 1953-12-01
Swan Hunter & Wigham Richardson Ltd v France Fenwick Tyne
& Wear Co Ltd (The Albion) (No.2)
[1953] 1 W.L.R. 1026; [1953] 2 All E.R. 679; [1953] 2 Lloyd's Rep.
82; [1953] 7 WLUK 9; (1953) 97 S.J. 524; CA; 1953-07-02
White v John Warwick & Co Ltd
[1953] 1 W.L.R. 1285; [1953] 2 All E.R. 1021; [1953] 5 WLUK 117;
(1953) 97 S.J. 740; CA; 1953-05-24
Taylor v Glasgow Corp
1952 S.C. 440; 1952 S.L.T. 399; [1952] 7 WLUK 74; IH (2 Div);
1952-07-23
Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v King, The
[1952] A.C. 192; [1952] 1 All E.R. 305; [1952] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1;
[1952] 1 WLUK 480; (1952) 96 S.J. 72; PC (Can); 1952-01-21
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing Co
[1951] 1 K.B. 805; [1951] 1 All E.R. 631; [1951] 2 WLUK 60; (1951)
95 S.J. 253; CA; 1951-02-16
Owners of Cargo Lately Laden on Board the Ardennes v
Owners of the Ardennes (The Ardennes)
[1951] 1 K.B. 55; [1950] 2 All E.R. 517; (1950) 84 Ll. L. Rep. 340;
[1950] 7 WLUK 7; (1950) 94 S.J. 458; KBD; 1950-07-05
Olley v Marlborough Court Ltd
[1949] 1 K.B. 532; [1949] 1 All E.R. 127; [1948] 12 WLUK 10; 9
A.L.R.2d 806; [1949] L.J.R. 360; (1949) 93 S.J. 40; CA; 1948-12-03
Alderslade v Hendon Laundry Ltd
Page3
[1945] K.B. 189; [1945] 1 All E.R. 244; [1945] 1 WLUK 45; CA;
1945-01-24
Bontex Knitting Works v St John's Garage
[1943] 2 All E.R. 690; [1943] 10 WLUK 13; KBD; 1943-10-14
Thompson v London Midland & Scottish Railway Co
[1930] 1 K.B. 41; [1929] 5 WLUK 27; CA; 1929-05-14
Cunard Steamship Co Ltd v Buerger
[1927] A.C. 1; (1926) 25 Ll. L. Rep. 215; [1926] 6 WLUK 71; HL;
1926-06-21
Hood v Anchor Line (Henderson Bros) Ltd
[1918] A.C. 837; 1918 S.C. (H.L.) 143; (1918) 2 S.L.T. 118; [1918] 7
WLUK 1; HL (SC); 1918-07-01
Roe v RA Naylor Ltd
[1917] 1 K.B. 712; [1917] 2 WLUK 17; (1918) 87 L.J. K.B. 958; KBD;
1917-02-09
Williamson v North of Scotland & Orkney & Shetland Steam
Navigation Co
1916 S.C. 554; 1916 1 S.L.T. 228; [1916] 2 WLUK 72; IH (2 Div);
1916-02-25
Royal Exchange Shipping Co Ltd v WJ Dixon & Co
(1886) 12 App. Cas. 11; [1886] 12 WLUK 24; HL; 1886-12-07
Mersey Steel & Iron Co Ltd v Naylor Benzon & Co
(1884) 9 App. Cas. 434; [1884] 3 WLUK 100; HL; 1884-03-28
Watkins v Rymill
(1883) 10 Q.B.D. 178; [1883] 1 WLUK 33; QBD; 1883-01-16
Crooks & Co v Allan
(1879) 5 Q.B.D. 38; [1879] 12 WLUK 84; QBD; 1879-12-20
Parker v South Eastern Railway Co
(1877) 2 C.P.D. 416; [1877] 4 WLUK 64; CA; 1877-04-25
Van Toll v South Eastern Railway
142 E.R. 1071; (1862) 12 C.B. N.S. 75; [1862] 4 WLUK 16; CCP;
1862-04-17
Key Cases Citing Applied
Heytex Bramsche GmbH v Unity Trade Capital Ltd
[2022] EWHC 2488 (Ch); [2022] 10 WLUK 91; [2023] B.P.I.R. 432;
Ch D; 2022-10-10
Kaye v Nu Skin UK Ltd
[2012] EWHC 958 (QB); [2012] 1 WLUK 470; [2012] C.T.L.C. 69;
QBD; 2012-01-24
Waldron-Kelly v British Railways Board
[1981] 3 WLUK 99; CC (Stockport); 1981-03-17
Firchuk and Firchuk (t/a Atlas Textile Wholesale) v Waterfront
Cartage, Division of Waterfront Investments and Cartage Ltd
[1969] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 533; [1969] 9 WLUK 2; 1970 A.M.C. 80; CC
(Ont); 1969-09-10
Mendelssohn v Normand
[1970] 1 Q.B. 177; [1969] 3 W.L.R. 139; [1969] 2 All E.R. 1215;
[1969] 2 WLUK 100; (1969) 113 S.J. 263; CA (Civ Div); 1969-02-26
Considered
Owen v Northampton BC
Page4
[1992] 1 WLUK 234; (1992) 156 L.G. Rev. 23; CA (Civ Div);
1992-01-01
Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd
[1989] Q.B. 433; [1988] 2 W.L.R. 615; [1988] 1 All E.R. 348; [1987]
11 WLUK 154; (1988) 7 Tr. L.R. 187; (1988) 85(9) L.S.G. 45; (1987)
137 N.L.J. 1159; (1988) 132 S.J. 460; CA (Civ Div); 1987-11-12
United Fresh Meat Co v Charterhouse Cold Storage
[1974] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 286; [1974] 5 WLUK 102; QBD; 1974-05-23
Hunt & Winterbothom (West of England) v BRS Parcels
[1962] 1 Q.B. 617; [1962] 2 W.L.R. 172; [1962] 1 All E.R. 111;
[1961] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 422; [1961] 12 WLUK 16; (1961) 105 S.J.
1124; CA; 1961-12-06
Distinguished
Sweeney v Peninsula Business Services Ltd
[2003] 4 WLUK 28; [2004] I.R.L.R. 49; EAT; 2003-04-01
Followed
Parker-Grennan v Camelot UK Lotteries Ltd
[2023] EWHC 800 (KB); [2023] 4 WLUK 23; KBD; 2023-04-04
All Cases Citing Mentioned by
Gilchrist v Govan Dental Centre
[2024] SC GLA 5; [2024] 1 WLUK 334; 2024 G.W.D. 7-56; Sh Ct
(Glasgow); 2024-01-19
Followed
Parker-Grennan v Camelot UK Lotteries Ltd
[2023] EWHC 800 (KB); [2023] 4 WLUK 23; KBD; 2023-04-04
Applied
Heytex Bramsche GmbH v Unity Trade Capital Ltd
[2022] EWHC 2488 (Ch); [2022] 10 WLUK 91; [2023] B.P.I.R. 432;
Ch D; 2022-10-10
Mentioned by
Huntsworth Wine Co Ltd v London City Bond Ltd
[2021] EWHC 2831 (Comm); [2021] 10 WLUK 310; QBD (Comm);
2021-10-22
Mentioned by
P&O Princess Cruises International Ltd v Demise Charterers of the
Columbus
[2021] EWHC 113 (Admlty); [2021] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 1305; [2021]
1 Lloyd's Rep. 440; [2021] 1 WLUK 262; QBD (Admlty); 2021-01-26
Mentioned by
Natixis SA v Marex Financial
[2019] EWHC 2549 (Comm); [2019] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 431; [2019] 10
WLUK 11; QBD (Comm); 2019-10-02
Mentioned by
Bates v Post Office Ltd (No.3: Common Issues)
[2019] EWHC 606 (QB); [2019] 3 WLUK 260; QBD; 2019-03-15
Mentioned by
Volcafe Ltd v Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA
[2018] UKSC 61; [2019] A.C. 358; [2018] 3 W.L.R. 2087; [2019] 2 All
Page5
E.R. 81; [2019] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 397; [2019] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 21;
[2018] 12 WLUK 15; [2018] 2 C.L.C. 965; SC; 2018-12-05
Mentioned by
Dera Commercial Estate v Derya Inc
[2018] EWHC 1673 (Comm); [2019] 1 All E.R. 1147; [2019] 1 All
E.R. (Comm) 448; [2018] Bus. L.R. 2105; [2019] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 57;
[2018] 7 WLUK 327; [2018] 2 C.L.C. 230; QBD (Comm); 2018-07-13
Mentioned by
Volcafe Ltd v Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA (t/a CSAV)
[2016] EWCA Civ 1103; [2017] Q.B. 915; [2017] 3 W.L.R. 1; [2017]
1 All E.R. (Comm) 751; [2017] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 32; [2016] 11 WLUK
320; [2016] 2 C.L.C. 762; CA (Civ Div); 2016-11-10
Mentioned by
Primary Group (UK) Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
[2014] EWHC 1082 (Ch); [2014] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 1121; [2014] 4
WLUK 503; [2014] R.P.C. 26; Ch D; 2014-04-11
Mentioned by
Harvey v Dunbar Assets Plc
[2013] EWCA Civ 952; [2013] 7 WLUK 925; [2013] B.P.I.R. 722;
[2013] 32 E.G. 57 (C.S.); CA (Civ Div); 2013-07-30
Mentioned by
Aspect Contracts (Asbestos) Ltd v Higgins Construction Plc
[2013] EWHC 1322 (TCC); [2013] Bus. L.R. 1199; [2013] 5 WLUK
625; [2013] B.L.R. 417; [2013] C.I.L.L. 3369; QBD (TCC);
2013-05-23
Applied
Kaye v Nu Skin UK Ltd
[2012] EWHC 958 (QB); [2012] 1 WLUK 470; [2012] C.T.L.C. 69;
QBD; 2012-01-24
Mentioned by
Exportadora Valle de Colina SA (t/a Exportadora Santa Elena) v AP
Moller-Maersk A/S (t/a Maersk Line)
[2010] EWHC 3224 (Comm); [2010] 12 WLUK 306; QBD (Comm);
2010-12-09
Mentioned by
Trigon Tools Ltd v Andrew Wright (PVC) Ltd
[2010] 7 WLUK 571; 2010 G.W.D. 30-612; Sh Ct (North Strathclyde)
(Kilmarnock); 2010-07-20
Mentioned by
Dennard v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
[2010] EWHC 812 (Ch); [2010] 4 WLUK 377; Ch D; 2010-04-23
Mentioned by
Capes (Hatherden) Ltd v Western Arable Services Ltd
[2009] EWHC 3065 (QB); [2010] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 477; [2009] 11
WLUK 630; QBD (Merc) (Bristol); 2009-11-25
Mentioned by
Page6
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National Plc
[2009] UKSC 6; [2010] 1 A.C. 696; [2009] 3 W.L.R. 1215; [2010] 1
All E.R. 667; [2010] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 945; [2010] 1 Lloyd's Rep.
281; [2009] 11 WLUK 606; [2010] 1 C.M.L.R. 44; [2010] Eu. L.R.
309; Times, November 26, 2009; (2009) 159 N.L.J. 1702; (2009)
153(45) S.J.L.B. 28; SC; 2009-11-25
Mentioned by
Kaye v Nu Skin UK Ltd
[2009] EWHC 3509 (Ch); [2010] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 832; [2011] 1
Lloyd's Rep. 40; [2009] 11 WLUK 248; Ch D (Bristol); 2009-11-11
Mentioned by
Langstane Housing Association Ltd v Riverside Construction
(Aberdeen) Ltd
[2009] CSOH 52; 2009 S.C.L.R. 639; [2009] 4 WLUK 121; 124 Con.
L.R. 211; (2010) 26 Const. L.J. 566; 2009 G.W.D. 27-429; OH;
2009-04-03
Mentioned by
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National Plc
[2009] EWCA Civ 116; [2009] 2 W.L.R. 1286; [2009] 1 All E.R.
(Comm) 1097; [2009] 2 WLUK 701; [2009] 2 C.M.L.R. 30; [2009]
E.C.C. 33; [2010] Eu. L.R. 1; Times, March 3, 2009; (2009) 106(10)
L.S.G. 16; CA (Civ Div); 2009-02-26
Mentioned by
Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat
[2007] EWCA Civ 243; [2007] 3 All E.R. 342; [2007] 2 All E.R.
(Comm) 23; [2007] Bus. L.R. 1075; [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 87; [2007]
3 WLUK 540; [2007] 1 C.L.C. 282; Times, April 13, 2007; (2007) 157
N.L.J. 482; (2007) 151 S.J.L.B. 430; CA (Civ Div); 2007-03-21
Mentioned by
Anders & Kern UK Ltd (t/a Anders & Kern Presentation Systems) v
CGU Insurance Plc (t/a Norwich Union Insurance)
[2007] EWHC 377 (Comm); [2007] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 1160; [2007] 3
WLUK 22; [2007] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 555; QBD; 2007-03-01
Mentioned by
Debenhams Retail Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners
[2004] EWHC 1540 (Ch); [2004] S.T.C. 1132; [2004] 6 WLUK 622;
[2004] B.T.C. 5494; [2004] B.V.C. 554; [2004] S.T.I. 1585; (2004)
154 N.L.J. 1106; Ch D; 2004-06-29
Mentioned by
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Addison
[2003] EWHC 1730 (Comm); [2003] 7 WLUK 388; QBD (Comm);
2003-07-15
Mentioned by
Marcq v Christie Manson & Woods Ltd (t/a Christie's)
[2003] EWCA Civ 731; [2004] Q.B. 286; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 980; [2003]
3 All E.R. 561; [2003] 5 WLUK 732; Times, May 30, 2003;
Independent, June 6, 2003; (2003) 100(27) L.S.G. 38; (2003) 147
S.J.L.B. 662; CA (Civ Div); 2003-05-23
Distinguished
Page7
Sweeney v Peninsula Business Services Ltd
[2003] 4 WLUK 28; [2004] I.R.L.R. 49; EAT; 2003-04-01
Mentioned by
Picardi (t/a Picardi Architects) v Cuniberti
[2002] EWHC 2923 (TCC); [2002] 12 WLUK 560; [2003] B.L.R. 487;
94 Con. L.R. 81; (2003) 19 Const. L.J. 350; QBD (TCC); 2002-12-19
Mentioned by
Marcq v Christie Manson & Woods Ltd (t/a Christie's)
[2002] EWHC 2148 (QB); [2002] 4 All E.R. 1005; [2002] 10 WLUK
790; Times, November 25, 2002; (2002) 99(46) L.S.G. 34; QBD;
2002-10-29
Mentioned by
AEG (UK) Ltd v Logic Resource Ltd
[1995] 10 WLUK 262; [1996] C.L.C. 265; CA (Civ Div); 1995-10-20
Considered
Owen v Northampton BC
[1992] 1 WLUK 234; (1992) 156 L.G. Rev. 23; CA (Civ Div);
1992-01-01
Mentioned by
Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
[1990] 6 WLUK 73; (1990) 22 H.L.R. 440; [1991] 02 E.G. 157;
[1990] E.G. 75 (C.S.); CA (Civ Div); 1990-06-08
Mentioned by
Jones v Northampton BC
[1990] 5 WLUK 162; Times, May 21, 1990; Independent, May 25,
1990; CA (Civ Div); 1990-05-15
Considered
Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd
[1989] Q.B. 433; [1988] 2 W.L.R. 615; [1988] 1 All E.R. 348; [1987]
11 WLUK 154; (1988) 7 Tr. L.R. 187; (1988) 85(9) L.S.G. 45; (1987)
137 N.L.J. 1159; (1988) 132 S.J. 460; CA (Civ Div); 1987-11-12
Mentioned by
Tracomin SA v Sudan Oil Seeds (No.1)
[1983] 1 W.L.R. 1026; [1983] 3 All E.R. 137; [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep.
384; [1983] 6 WLUK 164; [1983] Com. L.R. 269; [1984] E.C.C. 165;
CA (Civ Div); 1983-06-23
Mentioned by
Tracomin SA v Sudan Oil Seeds Co Ltd (No.2)
[1983] 1 W.L.R. 662; [1983] 2 All E.R. 129; [1983] 1 Lloyd's Rep 571
(Note); [1983] 2 WLUK 181; (1983) 127 S.J. 361; QBD (Comm);
1983-02-17
Mentioned by
Amalgamated Investment & Property Co Ltd (In Liquidation) v Texas
Commerce International Bank Ltd
[1982] Q.B. 84; [1981] 3 W.L.R. 565; [1981] 3 All E.R. 577; [1982] 1
Lloyd's Rep. 27; [1981] 7 WLUK 280; [1981] Com. L.R. 236; (1981)
125 S.J. 623; CA (Civ Div); 1981-07-31
Page8
Applied
Waldron-Kelly v British Railways Board
[1981] 3 WLUK 99; CC (Stockport); 1981-03-17
Mentioned by
Levison v Patent Steam Carpet Cleaning Co
[1978] Q.B. 69; [1977] 3 W.L.R. 90; [1977] 3 All E.R. 498; [1977] 4
WLUK 77; (1977) 121 S.J. 406; CA (Civ Div); 1977-04-22
Mentioned by
Grayston Plant Ltd v Plean Precast Ltd
1976 S.C. 206; [1976] 6 WLUK 19; IH (2 Div); 1976-06-09
Considered
United Fresh Meat Co v Charterhouse Cold Storage
[1974] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 286; [1974] 5 WLUK 102; QBD; 1974-05-23
Mentioned by
Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd
[1972] 2 Q.B. 71; [1972] 2 W.L.R. 401; [1972] 1 All E.R. 399; [1971]
11 WLUK 84; [1972] R.T.R. 190; (1972) 116 S.J. 158; CA (Civ Div);
1971-11-19
Mentioned by
Total Oil Great Britain Ltd v Thompson Garages (Biggin Hill) Ltd
[1972] 1 Q.B. 318; [1971] 3 W.L.R. 979; [1971] 3 All E.R. 1226;
[1971] 10 WLUK 16; (1971) 115 S.J. 848; CA (Civ Div); 1971-10-07
Mentioned by
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking
[1971] 2 Q.B. 163; [1971] 2 W.L.R. 585; [1971] 1 All E.R. 686;
[1971] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 289; [1970] 12 WLUK 111; [1971] R.T.R. 79;
Times, December 19, 1970; (1970) 115 S.J. 75; CA (Civ Div);
1970-12-18
Applied
Firchuk and Firchuk (t/a Atlas Textile Wholesale) v Waterfront
Cartage, Division of Waterfront Investments and Cartage Ltd
[1969] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 533; [1969] 9 WLUK 2; 1970 A.M.C. 80; CC
(Ont); 1969-09-10
Applied
Mendelssohn v Normand
[1970] 1 Q.B. 177; [1969] 3 W.L.R. 139; [1969] 2 All E.R. 1215;
[1969] 2 WLUK 100; (1969) 113 S.J. 263; CA (Civ Div); 1969-02-26
Mentioned by
Henry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd
[1969] 2 A.C. 31; [1968] 3 W.L.R. 110; [1968] 2 All E.R. 444; [1968]
1 Lloyd's Rep. 547; [1968] 5 WLUK 17; HL; 1968-05-08
Mentioned by
Henry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd
[1966] 1 W.L.R. 287; [1966] 1 All E.R. 309; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep.
197; [1965] 12 WLUK 89; Times, December 21, 1965; (1966) 110
S.J. 11; CA; 1965-12-20
Page9
Mentioned by
John Carter (Fine Worsteds) Ltd v Hanson Haulage (Leeds) Ltd
[1965] 2 Q.B. 495; [1965] 2 W.L.R. 553; [1965] 1 All E.R. 113;
[1965] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 49; [1964] 12 WLUK 58; (1965) 109 S.J. 47;
CA; 1964-12-14
Mentioned by
McCutcheon v David MacBrayne Ltd
[1964] 1 W.L.R. 125; [1964] 1 All E.R. 430; [1964] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 16;
1964 S.C. (H.L.) 28; 1964 S.L.T. 66; [1964] 1 WLUK 888; (1964)
108 S.J. 93; HL (SC); 1964-01-21
Mentioned by
Charterhouse Credit Co v Tolly
[1963] 2 Q.B. 683; [1963] 2 W.L.R. 1168; [1963] 2 All E.R. 432;
[1963] 3 WLUK 61; (1963) 107 S.J. 234; CA; 1963-03-15
Mentioned by
Hollins v Davy (J)
[1963] 1 Q.B. 844; [1963] 2 W.L.R. 201; [1963] 1 All E.R. 370;
[1962] 12 WLUK 3; (1962) 106 S.J. 1033; QBD; 1962-12-03
Considered
Hunt & Winterbothom (West of England) v BRS Parcels
[1962] 1 Q.B. 617; [1962] 2 W.L.R. 172; [1962] 1 All E.R. 111;
[1961] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 422; [1961] 12 WLUK 16; (1961) 105 S.J.
1124; CA; 1961-12-06
Mentioned by
Yeoman Credit v Apps
[1962] 2 Q.B. 508; [1961] 3 W.L.R. 94; [1961] 2 All E.R. 281; [1961]
3 WLUK 73; (1961) 105 S.J. 567; CA; 1961-03-16
Mentioned by
Towers & Co v Gray
[1961] 2 Q.B. 351; [1961] 2 W.L.R. 553; [1961] 2 All E.R. 68; [1961]
3 WLUK 8; (1961) 125 J.P. 391; 59 L.G.R. 271; (1961) 105 S.J. 235;
DC; 1961-03-02
Mentioned by
Akerib v Booth & Others Ltd
[1961] 1 W.L.R. 367; [1961] 1 All E.R. 380; [1961] 1 WLUK 866;
(1961) 105 S.J. 231; CA; 1961-01-18
Mentioned by
Sze Hai Tong Bank v Rambler Cycle Co
[1959] A.C. 576; [1959] 3 W.L.R. 214; [1959] 3 All E.R. 182; [1959] 2
Lloyd's Rep. 114; [1959] 6 WLUK 90; (1959) 103 S.J. 561; PC
(Sing); 1959-06-22
Mentioned by
GH Renton & Co Ltd v Palmyra Trading Corp of Panama (The
Caspiana)
[1957] A.C. 149; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 45; [1956] 3 All E.R. 957; [1956] 2
Lloyd's Rep. 379; [1956] 12 WLUK 12; HL; 1956-12-05
Mentioned by
Page10
Karsales (Harrow) Ltd v Wallis
[1956] 1 W.L.R. 936; [1956] 2 All E.R. 866; [1956] 6 WLUK 43;
(1956) 100 S.J. 548; CA; 1956-06-12
Journal Articles Incorporation of terms
Construction contracts; Implied incorporation; Intention; Standard
forms of contract.
C.J. 2005, Oct 26, 31
Tickets please!
Contract terms; Notice; Tickets.
L. Ex. 2003, Feb, 20-21
Commentary Benjamin's Sale of Goods 12th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 2 - Formation of the Contract
Documents: Section 1. - Agreement
Benjamin's Sale of Goods 12th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 13 - Exemption Clauses
Documents: Section 2. - Basic Principles of Formation of Contract
Applied to Exemption Clauses
Benjamin's Sale of Goods 12th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 13 - Exemption Clauses
Documents: Section 4. - Doctrine of Fundamental Breach
Boilerplate: Practical Clauses 8th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 13 - Contracting and the Internet
Documents: Consumer contract for the supply of goods
Building Contract Disputes
Chapter: Chapter 1 Construction Contracts
Documents: The Express Terms of Contract
Carver on Bills of Lading 5th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 9 - The Contract of Carriage by Sea and the
Hague and Hague-Visby Rules
Documents: Section 5. - Responsibilities and Liabilities of Carrier
Carver on Bills of Lading 5th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 11 - The Rotterdam Rules
Documents: Section 16. - Validity of Contractual Terms
Carver on Charterparties, 3rd Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 12 - The Measure of Damages for Particular
Types of Breach
Documents: (3) - Damage to the cargo
Contract Law: Textbook Series, 2nd Ed.
Page11
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Exclusion and limitation clauses
Documents: Incorporation
Contract Law: The Fundamentals, 6th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Exclusion Clauses
Documents: Stage 1: incorporation
Contract Law: The Fundamentals, 6th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Exclusion Clauses
Documents: Incorporation via a previous course of dealings
Contract Law: The Fundamentals, 6th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Exclusion Clauses
Documents: Overview of the Consumer Rights Act 2015
Contract Law: The Fundamentals, 6th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Exclusion Clauses
Documents: Key Cases Grid
Contract Law: The Fundamentals, 6th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Exclusion Clauses
Documents: End of Chapter Question
Drafting Commercial Agreements 6th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 2 - Standard conditions for the supply of goods to
business customers
Documents: Incorporation of standard conditions in the contract
Exclusion Clauses and Unfair Contract Terms 13th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 3 - Interpretation and Other Common Law
Doctrines
Documents: Onus of proof
Firth: Derivatives Law and Practice
Chapter: Chapter 3 - Execution of Transactions
Documents: 3.040 Course of dealing
Goods in Transit, 5th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Contractual Claims
Documents: Incorporation of Terms
International Agency, Distribution and Licensing Agreements
6th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 11 - Software Distribution Licences
Documents: Section 11.11 - Schedule—copyright notices and
disclaimer
Page12
Jurisdiction and Arbitration Agreements and their Enforcement
3rd Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 5 - Incorporation of Jurisdiction and Arbitration
Agreements
Documents: Section C. - Incorporation of One Party’s Standard
Terms and Conditions
Lightman & Moss on The Law of Administrators and Receivers
of Companies 6th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 21 - Retention of Title
Documents: Section 5. - Incorporation of the Retention of Title
Clause into the Contract
Misrepresentation, Mistake and Non-Disclosure, 6th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 9 - Exclusion and Limitation of Liability for
Misrepresentation
Documents: (1) - The Scope of the Common Law Controls
Practical Commercial Precedents
Chapter: General introduction
Documents: General introduction
Practical Commercial Precedents
Chapter: L1 Standard terms for the sale of goods
Documents: Introduction
Smith & Thomas: A Casebook on Contract 14th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - The Scope of the Agreement
Documents: Section 1. - Incorporation of Terms by Notice
The Interpretation of Contracts 8th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 3 - The Materials Available
Documents: Section 12. - Terms Incorporated by Notice
The Interpretation of Contracts 8th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 3 - The Materials Available
Documents: Section 13. - Terms Incorporated by Course of Dealing
The Interpretation of Contracts 8th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 5 - The Meaning of Words
Documents: Section 14. - Layout and Punctuation
The Law of Contract in Scotland 3rd Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Incorporation of Terms
Documents: What is incorporated?
The Law of Contract in Scotland 3rd Ed.
Page13
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Incorporation of Terms
Documents: Course of dealing
The Law of Contract in Scotland 3rd Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Incorporation of Terms
Documents: (2) - Knowledge
The Law of Contract in Scotland 3rd Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Incorporation of Terms
Documents: (3) - Assent
Treitel on The Law of Contract 15th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 6 - The Contents of a Contract
Documents: (ii) - Notice
Treitel on The Law of Contract 15th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Exemption Clauses and Unfair Terms
Documents: (ii) - Burden of proof
Treitel on The Law of Contract 15th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Exemption Clauses and Unfair Terms
Documents: (iv) - Seriousness of breach
Treitel on The Law of Contract 15th Ed.
Chapter: Chapter 7 - Exemption Clauses and Unfair Terms
Documents: Section (b) - Substantive control
© 2022 Thomson Reuters
