Accurate Evaluation of Interface State Density in SiC Metal-Oxidesemiconductor Structures Using Surface Potential Based On Depletion Capacitance
Accurate Evaluation of Interface State Density in SiC Metal-Oxidesemiconductor Structures Using Surface Potential Based On Depletion Capacitance
AUTHOR(S):
CITATION:
Yoshioka, Hironori ...[et al]. Accurate evaluation of interface state density in SiC metal-
oxide-semiconductor structures using surface potential based on depletion capacitance.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 2012, 111(1): 014502.
ISSUE DATE:
2012-01-01
URL:
http://hdl.handle.net/2433/160637
RIGHT:
Copyright 2012 American Institute of Physics. This article may be downloaded for
personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and the
American Institute of Physics. The following article appeared in JOURNAL OF APPLIED
PHYSICS 111, 014502 (2012) and may be found at http://link.aip.org/link/?jap/111/014502
A Self-archived copy in
Kyoto University Research Information Repository
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Related Articles
Fixed charge in high-k/GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor structures
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 102905 (2012)
Flexible, transparent dielectric capacitors with nanostructured electrodes
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 103106 (2012)
Dynamic piezoresponse force microscopy: Spatially resolved probing of polarization dynamics in time and
voltage domains
J. Appl. Phys. 112, 052021 (2012)
Co-sputtering yttrium into hafnium oxide thin films to produce ferroelectric properties
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 082905 (2012)
Safe and consistent method of spot-welding platinum thermocouple wires and foils for high temperature
measurements
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 084901 (2012)
Downloaded 10 Sep 2012 to 130.54.110.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
A Self-archived copy in
Kyoto University Research Information Repository
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Downloaded 10 Sep 2012 to 130.54.110.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
A Self-archived copy in
Kyoto University Research Information Repository
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp
014502-2 Yoshioka, Nakamura, and Kimoto J. Appl. Phys. 111, 014502 (2012)
Downloaded 10 Sep 2012 to 130.54.110.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
A Self-archived copy in
Kyoto University Research Information Repository
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp
014502-3 Yoshioka, Nakamura, and Kimoto J. Appl. Phys. 111, 014502 (2012)
EC ET ¼ eð0:19V wS Þ; (7)
IV. DISCUSSION
Figure 6 shows the interface state densities obtained by
the CwS method (CwS), the high-low method using a
high frequency of 100 MHz (high100MlowwS), and the
conductance method (conductancewS), where the ECET
of the horizontal axis was calculated from Eq. (7) using the
FIG. 4. CD þ CIT versus surface potential wS at various frequencies for a n-
surface potential determined by the proposed method. The
type SiC MOS capacitor, which was determined from the results given in use of the correct surface potential is denoted by adding
Fig. 1. The theoretical semiconductor capacitance CD,theory is also plotted. the term “wS.” The DIT distribution obtained by the CwS
Downloaded 10 Sep 2012 to 130.54.110.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
A Self-archived copy in
Kyoto University Research Information Repository
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp
014502-4 Yoshioka, Nakamura, and Kimoto J. Appl. Phys. 111, 014502 (2012)
Downloaded 10 Sep 2012 to 130.54.110.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
A Self-archived copy in
Kyoto University Research Information Repository
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp
014502-5 Yoshioka, Nakamura, and Kimoto J. Appl. Phys. 111, 014502 (2012)
5
In this paper, the proposed methods were only applied S. Harada, R. Kosugi, J. Senzaki, W.-J. Cho, K. Fukuda, K. Arai, and
for the dry-oxide MOS capacitor. We have also investigated S. Suzuki, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 1568 (2002).
6
P. Friedrichs, E. P. Burte, and R. Schörner, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 7814 (1996).
the NO-nitride MOS capacitors with low interface state den- 7
S. Dhar, S.-H. Ryu, and A. K. Agarwal, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 57,
sity, and we have found that the proposed methods have 1195 (2010).
8
additionally given valuable information. By detailed investi- M. Noborio, J. Suda, S. Beljakowa, M. Krieger, and T. Kimoto, Phys. Sta-
tus Solidi A 206, 2374 (2009).
gations and analyses, we confirmed that the proposed CwS 9
D. Okamoto, H. Yano, K. Hirata, T. Hatayama, and T. Fuyuki, IEEE Elec-
method gives accurate interface state density for the NO- tron Device Lett. 31, 710 (2010).
10
nitride MOS capacitors. These results will be presented in a P. Zhao, Rusli, Y. Liu, C. C. Tin, W. G. Zhu, and J. Ahn, Microelectron.
subsequent publication. Eng. 83, 61 (2006).
11
J. A. Cooper, Phys. Status Solidi 162, 305 (1997).
12
H. Yano, T. Kimoto, and H. Matsunami, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 301 (2002).
13
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS G. Y. Chung, C. C. Tin, and J. R. Williams, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 1713
(2000).
14
The authors appreciate the opportunity to use the imped- H. Li, S. Dimitrijev, H. B. Harrison, and D. Sweatman, Appl. Phys. Lett.
ance analyzer and technical advice from Agilent 70, 2028 (1997).
15
I. Pintilie, C. M. Teodorescu, F. Moscatelli, R. Nipoti, A. Poggi, S. Solmi,
Technologies. L. S. Løvlie, and B. G. Svensson, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 024503 (2010).
16
V. V. Afanas’ev, A. Stesmans, F. Ciobanu, G. Pensl, K. Y. Cheong, and
1
Y. Nakano, T. Mukai, R. Nakamura, T. Nakamura, and A. Kamisawa, Jpn. S. Dimitrijev, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 568 (2003).
17
J. Appl. Phys. 48, 04C100 (2009). E. H. Nicollian and J. R. Brews, MOS Physics and Technology (Wiley,
2
G. Pensl, S. Beljakowa, T. Frank, K. Gao, F. Speck, T. Seyller, L. Ley, New York, 1982).
18
F. Ciobanu, V. Afanas’ev, A. Stesmans, T. Kimoto, and A. Schöner, Phys. D. K. Schroder, Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization, 3rd
Status Solidi B 245, 1378 (2008). ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 2006).
3 19
M. Bassler, G. Pensl, and V. Afanas’ev, Diamond Relat. Mater. 6, 1472 E. Bano, T. Ouisse, L. D. Cioccio, and S. Karmann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65,
(1997). 2723 (1994).
4 20
J. Rozen, S. Dhar, M. E. Zvanut, J. R. Williams, and L. C. Feldman, X. D. Chen, S. Dhar, T. Isaacs-Smith, J. R. Williams, L. C. Feldman, and
J. Appl. Phys. 105, 124506 (2009). P. M. Mooney, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 033701 (2008).
Downloaded 10 Sep 2012 to 130.54.110.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions