Introduction To Clinical Pharmacology E Book Hosler 2024 Scribd Download
Introduction To Clinical Pharmacology E Book Hosler 2024 Scribd Download
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/introduction-to-clinical-
pharmacology-e-book-hosler/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD NOW
https://textbookfull.com/product/rang-dales-pharmacology-e-book-9th-
edition-james-m-ritter/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/macleods-clinical-examination-e-book-
dover/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/netters-clinical-anatomy-e-book-
hansen/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/pharmacology-an-introduction-henry-
hitner/
textboxfull.com
Nursing Interventions & Clinical Skills E-Book Seventh
Edition Ostendorf
https://textbookfull.com/product/nursing-interventions-clinical-
skills-e-book-seventh-edition-ostendorf/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/textbook-of-clinical-neuroanatomy-e-
book-3rd-edition-singh/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/basic-clinical-pharmacology-14th-
edition-bertram-g-katzung/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/bioequivalence-and-statistics-in-
clinical-pharmacology-second-edition-jones/
textboxfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/ma257-introduction-to-number-theory-
j-e-cremona/
textboxfull.com
Introduction to Clinical
Pharmacology
EDITION 9
Cover image
Title Page
Copyright
Reviewers
Preface
Organization and Features
Acknowledgments
To the Student
Reading and Review Tools
Chapter Features
Unit I General Principles
Drug Errors
3 Principles of Pharmacology
Drug Names
Drug Attachment
Drug Actions
Drug Cards
4 Drug Calculation
Calculating Drug Dosages
Enteral Drugs
Parenteral Drugs
Percutaneous Drugs
5 Anti-Infective Drugs
Infection
Antibiotics
Antitubercular Drugs
Antifungal Drugs
Antiparasitic Drugs
Antivirals
Retrovirus
Antiretrovirals
Antipsychotics
Antidepressants and Mood Stabilizers
Inflammation Management
Gout
Antiemetic Drugs
Fibrinolytic Drugs
Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents
Vaccination
Immunomodulating Therapy
Eye Problems
Over-the-Counter Drugs
Vitamins
Minerals
Bibliography
Glossary
A
G
H
Index
Copyright
Notices
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own
experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information,
methods, compounds or experiments described herein. Because of
rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent
verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made. To the
fullest extent of the law, no responsibility is assumed by Elsevier,
authors, editors or contributors for any injury and/or damage to
persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or
otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products,
instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
Printed in China
Last digit is the print number: 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Reviewers
Linda Gambill RN, MSN/Ed
LPN Instructor/Clinical Coordinator
Southwest Virginia Community College
Cedar Bluff, Virginia
Unit I
The first unit provides an overview of general content covering the
nursing process as it relates to drug administration, the importance
of safely giving drugs, and the principles of pharmacology that set
the knowledge base for specified drug categories. For example, this
completely revised textbook includes information on unique aspects
of the contemporary LPN/VN practice environment, including
working in teams with the registered nurse, healthcare provider, and
other healthcare professionals. An overview of the nursing process
as it applies to pharmacology is provided.
Safe practice is accentuated throughout Chapter 1, with a guide to
planning and giving drugs to patients. The updated 9 Rights of Drug
Administration is presented in detail and includes the right of the
patient to refuse a drug. Although giving drugs properly is
important, equally important are evaluating the expected drug
response, understanding common side effects, and knowing how to
handle adverse events from drugs.
The legal regulatory and ethical content related to giving drugs in
the LPN/VN role has been updated to include a thorough discussion
of schedule drugs, drug diversion, and a distinction between
addiction and physical dependence in a patient. In Chapter 2,
technology-associated patient identification, drug orders, and the
giving and recording of drugs in either a standard Kardex or
electronic health record are covered.
Unit II
Unit II is concerned with drug calculation, preparation, and
administration. LPN/VNs often practice in assisted nursing centers,
nursing homes, and care centers where high-tech drug
administration systems may not be used. Thus they need to be able
to give medications safely and accurately, relying on their own
ability to calculate the drug dosages accurately. Chapter 4 incudes
the “need to know” content related to drug calculation and includes
dimensional analysis, a mathematical technique that is being
adopted by many nursing programs for drug calculation.
Intravenous drugs, oral drugs, parenteral drugs, and intravenous
infusion calculation are presented in an organized, step-by-step
manner. The application of topical, transdermal, mucous membrane,
and eye and ear drugs is also presented with accompanying
illustrations to help the student visualize the process while reading
the material.
Unit III
Drug classification groups provide essential information on 15
specific drug classifications. Unit III focuses on content that has
application to treatment purpose (i.e., anti-infective drugs) and are
associated with body systems, such as renal, urinary, and
cardiovascular systems. Drugs for the treatment of cancer have been
removed because the LPN/VN does not administer or monitor these
drugs, which are given by specially certified oncology nurses. By
grouping drugs using the drug classification system, students
Discovering Diverse Content Through
Random Scribd Documents
Lucrezia. Madonna Adriana brought me here;
She stays without: I go back to the convent.
Cesare—;tell me all that I should pray.
One leaves Borgia reluctantly, having done so much less than justice to
it: nevertheless, it is refreshing to turn to Deirdre after an atmosphere so
charged and tropical. Not that Deirdre is set on any lower plane of emotion,
for it also deals with vast passions. But in this play we pass visibly to a
more northerly latitude, to an austerer race and a more primitive age; and it
is in an air swept clean by storm that the business of sowing the wind and
reaping the whirlwind goes forward.
Michael Field has made a noble rendering of this old Irish story which,
its subject dating from the first century, suggests a cause no less remote
than that for the ancient feud between Ulster and the rest of Ireland. The
story is well known: the birth of Deirdre and the prophecies of doom to
Ulster through her; the defiance of the doom by Conchobar the king, and
the fostering of Deirdre to be his wife; the carrying off of Deirdre on the
eve of her wedding by Naisi and their flight to Alba; the invitation to Naisi
and his brothers to return under Conchobar’s promise of forgiveness; and
the treacherous assassination of them upon their arrival. There are many
variants of the legend; and our poet has chosen the oldest of them all, that
preserved in the Book of Leinster, for the chief events of her drama. She
was compelled to alter the story at one point, for it would hardly have been
convenient to represent the Sons of Usnach slain, all three at one stroke, by
the magic sword. But in varying the manner of their death she was enabled
to adopt another form of the legend, in which Naisi and his two brothers
were overcome by a Druid’s enchantment, and, believing themselves to be
drowning, dropped their weapons and were immediately overpowered by
Conchobar’s men. There was, however, a difficulty here too; for whereas
three heads lopped off at one blow was a little too dynamic even for the
purposes of drama, an unseen spell of wizardry was altogether too static;
and the poet therefore contrived a scene in which Naisi’s comrades are
actually drowned, and he, left alone to protect Deirdre, is slain by Eogan.
Another modification, with less warrant from the documents, perhaps,
but of even greater interest, is that which introduces into this primitive
world the first gleam of Christianity. The fact might suggest that the Deirdre
play was written after the poets’ conversion, did one not know that they
were at work on the theme some time before. But it is extremely probable
that the passage in which the wise woman Lebarcham tries to turn
Conchobar from brooding on vengeance by the tale of a new god who
refused to avenge himself on his enemies was inserted after the first draft of
the play was made. It is written in prose, and, placed at the beginning of Act
III, hardly affects the subsequent action. From that point of view it might be
considered superfluous; but Michael, though not Henry, was capable of so
much over-zeal. She was, however, also capable of justifying her act
artistically. The interpolation is at least not an anachronism. It is possible,
there in Ireland, that even so early had penetrated “the story of how a god
met his death ... young, radiant ... bearing summer in his hands.” But it
might have been a menace to the unity of the drama: it might have
destroyed the satisfying wholeness which, in whatever form one finds it, the
pagan story possesses. Michael Field avoided that calamity. She threw her
glimmer of Christian light across the scene in such a way that it reveals
more strongly by contrast the dark elements of which the story is composed.
By it one instinctively measures the barbarity of the age out of which the
story came, and realizes its antiquity. The poet does not allow it to influence
action, for that would weaken the tragedy; but she uses the occasion to
humanize and make credible that which, in the Conchobar of the records,
seems almost monstrous. In those ancient tales Conchobar plans his
vengeance on Naisi and his brothers with a coldness that is diabolic and a
precision almost mechanical. He provides for his own safety, too, with
comical caution, carefully sounding one after another of his knights until he
finds one who does not immediately threaten to kill him for suggesting such
a dastardly deed as the murder of the Sons of Usnach. Yet, as our poet has
re-created Conchobar, he is a human soul driven this way and that in a
running fight with passion; pitiable in his hopeless love for Deirdre,
comprehensible in his wrath against Naisi, sinister and terrifying in his
revenge. And underneath the overt drama lies a profounder irony; for while
he is plotting in his heart the enormous treachery, Lebarcham tells of the
young god who was betrayed by his friends, and he says:
Hush, woman, for my heart is broken. Would I had been there, I who can
deal division between hosts. I would have set the Bound One free. If I could
avenge him!
The play is written in five acts and a prologue; but is not divided into
scenes. Its form is for the most part blank verse—;the iambic pentameter of
Michael Field which is so often neither iambic nor a pentameter. Her verse
is, indeed, a very variable line, changing its unit as frequently as will
consist with a regular form; and as flexible, sinewy, and nervous as will
consist with dignity, grace, and splendid colour. Prose passages occur in
Acts III and V; and a form of lyrical rhapsody is used to express the Druid
prophecies and Deirdre’s lament. The use of lyrics in her drama was not
new to Michael Field, who from the beginning could always relieve the
strain of intense emotion by a graceful song. But in this case she is
following, with her accustomed fidelity, lines laid down in older renderings
of the legend.
The most notable feature of this play is its ending. No author of the more
important modern versions of this theme has dared to take his conclusion
from the oldest one of all. Usually he has preferred the variant which tells
of Deirdre, broken-hearted at Naisi’s murder, falling dead into his grave.
This is, of course, in some respects a more ‘poetic’ passing: it lends itself to
romantic treatment, and its tragedy is more immediate and final. Moreover,
from the dramaturgic point of view the action is easier to handle and more
certain of its effect. Michael Field was not, however, attracted by mere
facility. Truth drew her with a stronger lure, and to her the more ancient
story would make a claim deeper than loyalty. For she would see Deirdre’s
survival not only as a more probable thing, but as something more
profoundly tragic; and the manner of her death, when it came, as more
clearly of a piece with the old saga and essentially of Deirdre’s wilful and
resolute character.
Deirdre is no Helen, though her legend has features so similar. The mere
outline of her which the old story gives indicates a creature who will
compel destiny rather than suffer it; and our poet has but completed,
imaginatively, what the original suggests—;a girl whose instinct of chastity
drives her away from marriage without love; whose ardour and courage
claim her proper mate; whose fidelity keeps her unalterably true; and whose
head is at least as sound as her heart is tender. For although she is a rather
tearful creature, she is also very astute; and Naisi need not have died quite
so young if he had only listened to her warning and condescended to take
her advice. Deirdre is, in short, of her race and of her time as surely as
Lucrezia Borgia is a daughter of Pope Alexander VI and a child of the
Italian Renaissance. Michael Field’s range in the creation of women
characters is very wide, and the verisimilitude with which she presents
natures so alien from herself as the courtesan and the voluptuary might be
astonishing if one thought of her simply as a Victorian lady, and not as a
great creative artist. Nevertheless, in the re-creation of Deirdre one feels
that she must have taken an especial joy, as witness the opening passage of
Act I, where Lebarcham and Medv the nurse are discussing their fosterling.
It is the morning of her sixteenth birthday, and King Conchobar is coming
to the little secluded house where Deirdre has been brought up to claim her
as his bride:
Lebarcham. Be comforted.
She loves you, she will bless you all her years:
But if she hate—;I would not be the creature
To cross her path, not if I were the chieftain
Of Ulla, or of Alba, or the world.
Again, in the same first act, when Deirdre has prevailed on Lebarcham
to bring Naisi to the hut, and the two have spoken of their love, it is she
who at once perceives where that confession must lead. Naisi would rather
kiss and part than rob the mighty Conchobar of his bride. But for Deirdre,
having kissed, there shall be no parting:
It is, however, in the last act that Michael Field again triumphantly
proves her mettle as poet and dramatist. She had stubborn material here,
harsh and crude stuff which kept the poets long at bay. For Deirdre’s end as
related by the old bard is a bit of primitive savagery matched in terms of the
plainest realism. Conchobar, after Naisi is enticed back to Ulster and
murdered, takes possession of Deirdre; and she remains in his house for a
year. But her constant reproaches and lamentation weary him; and at last, in
order to subdue her, he threatens to lend her for a year to the man she hates
most, Eogan, the slayer of Naisi. She is thereupon driven off in Eogan’s
chariot, apparently subdued, seated in shame between him and Conchobar.
At a gross taunt from Conchobar, however, she springs up, and flings
herself out upon the ground. “There was a large rock near: she hurled her
head at the stone so that she broke her skull, and killed herself.”
Our poet does not try to make this pretty or pleasing: and at one point at
least she uses the exact terminology of the translation from which she
worked. Its brutal elements are not disguised: Deirdre’s humiliation and the
animal rage of Conchobar and Eogan remain hideous even after the poet,
accepting all the material, has wrought it into a tragedy of consummate
beauty. Its beauty has, indeed, more terror than pity in it—;it is brimmed
with life’s actual bitterness—;but the depth and power of this Deirdre are
not equalled by any other.
In quoting the closing passage of the play one does not afflict the reader
by a comment on it; but there is a technical point which should be noticed.
It is the device of the Messenger by which the poet avoids the
representation of Deirdre’s death. The manner of that death was not only
too awkward to present, but its horror as a spectacle was too great for
artistic control. In causing it to be related by the charioteer Fergna, the poet
has, in classic fashion, removed it from actual vision, but has enabled the
mind to contemplate what the eyes could not have borne to look upon.
The chariot has driven off with Deirdre, Eogan, and Conchobar; and
Lebarcham watches it till it passes out of sight beyond the mound that
marks Naisi’s grave. Then she turns away, lamenting; and suddenly Fergna,
the charioteer, re-enters, scared and breathless:
Lebarcham. Fosterling,
My Deirdre! Had they cast her from the car,
That thus she lay on the sharp rocks of stone?
Conchobar [with a hoarse laugh]. Ho, they have passed the borders,
Passed from my realm.
Nay, Fergna,
Lead the great car, checking the horses’ heads
Beside yon barrow of a hero: there
Unyoke them. Dig a neighbour sepulchre.
And let the bases of each monument
Touch where they spring.
* * *
In concluding this very brief survey of Michael Field’s life and poetry,
one turns back with a sense of illumination to her sonnet called The Poet,
which has been already quoted. For therein Michael Field has indicated the
nature of her own genius and the conditions of its activity. She was not
thinking of herself, of course, but of the poetic nature in the abstract, when
she declared in the first two lines of the sestet that the poet is
Those verses apply in some degree to the whole race of poets, which is,
indeed, the test of their truth. Yet it is significant that in choosing precisely
that form of expression for the truth, Michael Field has inadvertently stated
the essential meaning of her own life, of her long service to literature, and
of the peculiar greatness and possible limitation of her poetry.
“A work of some strange passion.” Strange, indeed, and in many ways.
For, first, it is no common thing to find, in a world preoccupied with traffic
and ambition, two souls completely innocent of both. Not small souls, nor
stupid nor ignorant ones—;as clever people might aver in order to account
for the phenomenon—;but of full stature, intelligent, level-headed, and with
their sober measure of English common sense. They knew themselves, too
—;were aware that they possessed genius, that they had first-rate minds and
were artists of great accomplishment. Moreover, for the larger part of their
life they were on terms with ‘the world’; they welcomed experience as few
Victorian women dared, gathered knowledge eagerly wherever it was to be
found, and had business ability sufficient to direct prudently their own
affairs.
They would have denied that there was anything of the fanatic or the
visionary in the dedication of themselves to their art, believing fanaticism to
be incongruous with the undiluted English strain of which they boasted.
And, indeed, there is something typical of the race in this deliberate setting
of a course and dogged persistence in it. Yet there is hardly an English
precedent for their career; and it is to France one must look—;to the
Goncourts or to Erckmann-Chatrian—;to match the long collaboration, or
to find similar examples of their artistic method. And not even there, so far
as I know, will be found another such case of disinterested service.
But the lines we have noted have an application to the work as well as to
the life of Michael Field. They may be used almost literally, to summarize
in a convenient definition the nature of her poetry. For in this body of work
one sees passion as an almost over-powering element, and it is of surprising
strangeness. However fully one may recognize the truth that there is no sex
in genius, I suppose that we shall always be startled at the appearance of an
Emily Brontë or a Michael Field. They seem such slight instruments for the
primeval music that the earth-mother plays upon them. And their
vehemence mingles so oddly with tenderer and more delicate strains that it
will always be possible for a reviewer to sneer at what is “to the Greeks
foolishness”—;he having no perception of the fact that in gentleness added
to strength a larger humanity is expressed. Such an eye as Meredith’s could
perceive that, and, catching sight of some reviewing stupidity about it,
would flash lightnings of wrath in that direction, and send indignant
sympathy to the poets.
There is strangeness, too, of another kind in the passion which was the
impulse of this poetry. Under the restraint that art has put upon it, it is, as
we have seen, an elemental thing. It is a creative force akin to that of Emily
Brontë or of Byron, and is tamer than their wild genius only in appearance.
Its more ordered manner grew from two causes: that one of the
collaborators blessedly possessed a sense of form, and that both of them
lived withdrawn from the brawl of life. They were placed, perhaps, a little
too far from “Time’s harsh drill.” Their lives were, on the whole, easier and
happier ones than are given to most people. That is why the loss of their
Chow dog caused them a grief which seems exaggerated to minds not so
sensitively tuned as theirs. Until the agony of the last three years overtook
them, their share of the common lot of sorrow had been the barest
minimum: adversity did not so much as look their way: poverty laid no
finger on them, and was but vaguely apprehended, in the distance, as
something pitiful for its ugliness. Therefore, secure and leisured, they
envisaged life, in the main, through art, through philosophy, through
literature, and hardly ever through the raw stuff of life itself. And thence
comes the peculiar character which the passion of their poetry acquired, as
of some fierce creature caught and bound in golden chains.
It may be that this seclusion from life will be felt in Michael Field’s
poetry as a limitation; that the final conviction imposed upon the mind by
the authority of experience is wanting; and that the work lacks a certain dry
wisdom of which difficult living is a necessary condition. It may be so; but
I do not think the stricture a valid charge against their work, first because of
our poets’ great gift of imagination, and second because they chose so
rightly their artistic medium. Comedy may require the discipline of
experience, the observing eye constantly fixed upon the object, and a rich
knowledge of the world; but surely tragedy requires before everything else
creative imagination, sympathy, and a certain greatness of heart and mind.
Those gifts Michael Field possessed in very large degree; so large that one
often stands in amazement before the protagonists of her drama,
demanding, in the name of all things wonderful, how two Victorian women
“ever came to think of that.” A Renaissance pope, a Saxon peasant, or a
priest of Dionysos—;decadent emperors, austere Roman patriots, or a
Frankish king turned monk—;those are only a few of the surprising
creatures of her imagination, conceived not as historical figures merely, but
as living souls. And by the range of her women characters—;from the
dignity of a Julia Domna to the wild-rose sweetness of a Rosamund; from
the Scottish Mary, with her rich capacity for loving, to the fierce chastity of
an Irish Deirdre, or the soul of goodness in a courtesan; from the subtlety of
a Lucrezia Borgia to the proud singleness of a Mariamne; from the virago-
venom of an Elinor to the sensitive simplicity of a country-girl, or the
wrong-headedness of a little princess whose instincts have been perverted
by frustration—;Michael Field has greatly enriched the world’s knowledge
of womanhood.
She did not set out to do that, of course. Her sanity is evident once more
in the moderation with which she held her feminist sympathies, despite the
clamour of the time and the provocation she received from masculine
mishandling of her work. Herein too she had removed herself from “Time’s
harsh drill,” having too great a reverence for her art to use it for the
purposes of propaganda. That fact leads us again to her sonnet and the light
it throws upon herself. For in studying her work one sees that she fulfilled
completely her own conception of the poet—;as an artist withdrawn from
the common struggle to wrestle with a fiercer power, and subdue it to a
shape of recognizable beauty.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com