NOTES - 1-The Origin and Development of Educational Management
NOTES - 1-The Origin and Development of Educational Management
Educational management, as a distinct field of study and practice, has its roots in the broader
field of management and organizational theory. Its emergence as a specialized area can be traced
back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries, coinciding with the industrial revolution and the
growth of large-scale organizations.
1. Industrial Revolution: The rise of large-scale industrial organizations created a need for
efficient management practices. This led to the development of management theories and
principles that were later adapted to educational settings.
2. Scientific Management: Pioneers like Frederick Winslow Taylor and Frank and Lillian
Gilbreth introduced scientific methods to improve efficiency and productivity in the
workplace. These principles were applied to educational institutions to streamline
operations and optimize resource allocation.
3. Bureaucracy: Max Weber's theory of bureaucracy emphasized the importance of formal
rules, procedures, and hierarchical structures in organizations. This concept influenced
the development of educational administration systems, which often adopted bureaucratic
models.
4. Human Relations Movement: This movement highlighted the importance of human
factors in organizational success. It emphasized the need to consider employee morale,
motivation, and satisfaction. This led to a shift in educational management towards a
more people-centered approach.
5. Systems Theory: Systems theory provided a framework for understanding organizations
as complex systems with interrelated components. This perspective helped educators to
analyze and manage educational institutions as interconnected entities.
In conclusion, educational management has evolved significantly over time, drawing on insights
from various fields of management and organizational theory. It continues to be a dynamic and
complex field, adapting to the changing needs and challenges of education.
General Principles of Management Applied to US School
Systems in 1913
The early 20th century, particularly the year 1913, was a time of significant growth and change
in the United States. The school system was no exception. As the country experienced rapid
industrialization and urbanization, there was a pressing need to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of education. General principles of management, emerging from the industrial
revolution, were applied to address the challenges faced by the US school system.
Here are some of the key principles of management that were relevant to the problems of the US
school system in 1913:
1. Scientific Management:
2. Bureaucracy:
3. Human Relations:
Employee Morale: This principle recognized the importance of employee morale and
satisfaction. In schools, this meant creating a positive and supportive work environment
for teachers, providing professional development opportunities, and fostering a sense of
community.
4. Systems Theory:
While these principles provided a valuable framework for improving the US school system in
1913, they also faced criticism for their emphasis on efficiency and standardization at the
expense of individual needs and creativity. Over time, the focus of educational management has
shifted towards a more humanistic approach that emphasizes the importance of student-centered
learning and personalized instruction.
Federal Funding: The federal government played a more active role in education during
the Great Depression, providing funding to support schools and universities. This funding
helped to ensure that all students had access to basic education, even in times of
economic hardship.
Curriculum Reform: Educational administrators worked to reform curricula to make
them more relevant to the needs of the times. For example, vocational training programs
were expanded to prepare students for entry-level jobs.
School Construction: Federal funding also supported the construction of new schools
and the renovation of existing facilities. This helped to improve access to education and
provide students with better learning environments.
Economic Constraints: Despite federal funding, economic constraints limited the scope
of educational reforms. Schools were often forced to make do with limited resources.
Social Inequalities: While education was seen as a means of promoting social justice,
deep-rooted social inequalities persisted. Access to quality education remained uneven,
particularly for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Teacher Shortages: The Depression led to a shortage of qualified teachers, which
further limited the effectiveness of educational reforms.
In conclusion, educational administration played a vital role in shaping American social policy
during the Great Depression. By providing funding, supporting curriculum reform, and
improving school facilities, educational administrators helped to address the economic and social
challenges of the time. However, the limitations imposed by economic constraints and social
inequalities made it difficult to achieve the full potential of education as a social policy tool.
1. Progressive Era Reforms: The Progressive Era (roughly 1890-1920) had laid the
groundwork for democratic reforms in education. This included the establishment of
school boards, which were often elected by the public, and the promotion of local control
over education.
2. Great Depression: The economic hardship of the Great Depression led to increased
public scrutiny of government institutions, including schools. This created a climate
where there was greater demand for accountability and transparency in educational
governance.
3. Social Movements: Social movements, such as the labor movement and the civil rights
movement, were also advocating for greater democratic participation. These movements
sought to empower marginalized groups and give them a voice in decision-making
processes.
In conclusion, while the concept of democracy in school administration was gaining momentum
in the United States in 1934, it was still a work in progress. The challenges posed by social
inequalities, economic constraints, and bureaucratic influences made it difficult to fully realize
the potential of democratic governance in education. However, the seeds of democratic reform
had been sown, and they would continue to shape the future of American education.
A practical handbook of school management by teachers would likely have covered a wide range
of topics, reflecting the challenges and opportunities faced by schools in the 1960s. Here are
some potential themes:
Class Size: The handbook could have addressed the issue of class size, which was a
concern in many schools. It might have provided strategies for managing large classes or
for organizing small group work.
Discipline: Discipline was a major challenge for many teachers. The handbook would
have offered advice on classroom management techniques, conflict resolution, and
behavior modification strategies.
School Facilities: The handbook might have discussed the importance of well-
maintained and appropriate school facilities, including classrooms, laboratories, and
playgrounds.
4. School-Community Relations:
Parent Involvement: The handbook might have encouraged teachers to involve parents
in school activities and decision-making. It could have provided tips on effective
communication with parents and the community.
Community Partnerships: Schools were increasingly forming partnerships with local
businesses, organizations, and institutions. The handbook could have discussed the
benefits of such partnerships and how to establish them.
In addition to these topics, a practical handbook of school management in the 1960s would
likely have addressed specific challenges faced by schools during that period, such as: