Unit-4

Ethical Considerations in Data Privacy

1. Introduction to Data Privacy and Ethics
With the exponential growth and widespread accessibility of the internet, data has
emerged as the quintessential currency that propels and influences the global
economy. It has become evident to organizations across the entire spectrum,
encompassing both commercial enterprises and non-profit entities, that data holds
the key to comprehending and catering to the needs of current and prospective
users. Consequently, these organizations have harnessed increasingly powerful
tools to gather, store, and meticulously analyze an array of sensitive user data,
ranging from individuals' web browsing habits to vital primary health records.
While the ramifications of this data-driven world can undoubtedly be advantageous,
exemplified by more targeted advertising and vastly improved user experiences that
permeate our daily lives, it also inevitably engenders a plethora of concerns and
reservations regarding privacy and ownership of information. At the very
intersection where matters of privacy and data converge, an intricate and
illuminating ethical landscape comes to the fore, giving rise to a multitude of
profound questions. The collection, utilization, dissemination, and ownership of
data can all become arenas of intense moral contention. In turn, this necessitates
careful exploration and evaluation of the intricate nuances surrounding data privacy
and ethics. Privacy emerges as a pivotal issue across all research initiatives that are
centered around personal medical data. Ethics and privacy have rapidly risen to the
ranks of indispensability when it comes to the execution of scientific research
involving personal data. These concerns have become an integral part of
professional healthcare training, highlighting their significance and the
responsibility that accompanies the handling of such sensitive information.
Researchers in the realm of health data are consistently confronted with a myriad of
privacy and data protection challenges that they must diligently navigate. It is
essential for them to be cognizant of the multitude of factors that must be taken into
careful consideration, ensuring the safeguarding of individuals' privacy. The domain
of big data and predictive analytics has emerged as a game-changer, showcasing the
potential to profoundly enhance intelligence by facilitating a deeper and broader
understanding through learning from outcomes on a larger scale, while

1|Page
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
simultaneously augmenting models with new sources of information.
Encouragingly, there are visible indicators that suggest this promise is being
realized across various spheres. Nevertheless, alongside these astounding
advancements, there also exist legitimate apprehensions surrounding the potential
misuse of such data and models. The necessity to minimize privacy and
confidentiality vulnerabilities in the context of big data cannot be underestimated,
particularly in terms of safeguarding individuals' interests with regard to their
personal data, thus mitigating the risk of far-reaching discriminatory effects that
could permeate throughout an entire system. It is incumbent upon the collective
effort of further analysis and investigation into the intricate socio-technical
relationships that exist between research endeavors, policy formulation, regulatory
frameworks, and commercial systems within the realm of big data. Only through
such diligent exploration can we hope to fully comprehend the intricacies at play
and effectively address the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. [1][2]

1.1. Definition and Importance of Data Privacy

Data privacy, or information privacy, is the crucial and delicate relationship
between the systematic collection and dissemination of data, advanced technology,
the high public expectation of privacy, and the multifaceted legal and political issues
that revolve around this intricate dynamic. Due to the extraordinary prevalence and
pervasive distribution of personal information by governments, businesses, and
other esteemed institutions, data privacy has undeniably assumed a paramount
standing as an encompassing predicament across diverse spheres. In its essence,
data privacy inherently delves into the fundamental query of which specific set of
data should be securely stored, for an appropriate duration, and which carefully
selected individuals or entities are ethically granted access to it. Prime and well-
documented examples that illustrate the intricacies of data privacy issues include
the dire consequences of identity theft, the utmost protection of medical records
and bank records, as well as the indispensable safeguarding of privacy within the
vast realm of online social networks. Time and again, it is abundantly clear that data
privacy embodies an escalating concern that has reverberated throughout multiple
organizations and governments worldwide, igniting a noteworthy call for robust
and comprehensive legislation that safeguards this vital realm. As a testament to
this pressing matter, stronger and more stringent data privacy laws have steadily
gained momentum and have been proposed or enacted not only in distinct regions
within the unparalleled European Union, but also in the formidable domain of the
United States. Ultimately, data privacy, or information privacy, constitutes an
intricate web of policy and regulatory dilemmas, passionately embroiled with the
profound ownership and discretionary usage of imperative data, steadfastly focused
on scrutinizing the pivotal question of precisely who possesses the right to

2|Page
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
conscientiously collect, distribute, share, and analyze data, and most importantly,
under what explicitly defined circumstances permissible entities can ultimately
carry out these actions. Moreover, the ethical frameworks surrounding data privacy
have become increasingly relevant as the collection and processing of data have
expanded at an unprecedented rate. In a datafied society, personal data holds new
meanings and values, reshaping interactions between individuals and social and
political institutions across civic and economic spheres. The concept of privacy itself
is a highly complex and contested notion, making it challenging to establish a
concise definition. Consequently, contemporary debates often involve multiple
conceptions of privacy that can overlap or intersect. To fully grasp the implications
of these conceptions in the context of a datafied society, a critical examination of the
most influential approaches is essential. Over the past few decades, data privacy has
gained considerable attention in public discourse and research. However, significant
work remains to be done in implementing and enforcing data privacy principles
effectively. Given the ongoing trend of datafication and its profound impact on
privacy, this article aims to provide a concise explanation and analysis of various
approaches to data privacy. It explores these approaches across different yet
interconnected domains, addressing conceptual, legal, and ethical aspects of data
privacy. By undertaking this comprehensive exploration, the goal is to facilitate a
comprehensive understanding of the subject within the current landscape and
enable informed discussions and decision-making pertaining to data privacy.
[3][1][3][4]

2. Privacy and Surveillance

The idea that the state should respect and protect the privacy of individuals is called
informational privacy. This new and distinct quality, the right to informational self-
determination by individuals or "The Right to be Let Alone," is seen as one of the
most significant and yet most neglected developments in international human right
protection. Privacy is not only understood as an interest deserving protection but
also, and most importantly, "as that type of protection that individuals expect from
others or institutions in an effort to maintain control over life and intimate matters
of personal significance." This conception of privacy as a right presupposes the
power of control over information. Individuals are accepted as having the right to
maintain control of information about themselves, according to three fundamental
assumptions.

First, individuals are conscious and, therefore, must be informed or "notice" of the
existence of an entity interested in acquiring personal data from them, also known
as say hunting. Second, individuals must have "consent," meaning that they must
authorize or "benefit" an entity who seeks to acquire and use their data. By means of

3|Page
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
"consent," individuals are able to control the disclosure and use of that information.
Third, individuals should be entitled to exercise control and surveillance rights on
the data collected about them to ensure the reliability and fairness of the collection
process and use of such information. These fundamental concepts of notice, consent,
and control seem to be basic prerequisites for the ethical conduct of an organization
regarding privacy.

2.1. Types of Surveillance Technologies

The increased availability and use of highly sophisticated surveillance technologies
and the widespread proliferation of contemporary surveillance practices have been
accompanied by an unprecedented level of intense scrutiny and examination.
Lengthy and heated debates about the extensive impacts of surveillance on
individuals, privacy, society, social ordering and control, and democracy have been
ignited. These exhaustive discussions encapsulate a broad spectrum of surveillance
practices, ranging from ubiquitous video surveillance and vast trace DNA databases
to comprehensive systems that monitor and track weather patterns, flood
occurrences, infectious diseases, and even website activities. Additionally, there has
been a discernible increase in the prevalence of transnational surveillance networks
and ambitious government endeavors aimed at processing enormous volumes of
data. Parallel to these extensive debates, fervent calls have emerged for enhanced
oversight and stricter limitations on the utilization of surveillance technologies
through the establishment of principled guidelines, comprehensive regulatory
frameworks, and rigorous legislation. However, it is only relatively recently that
attention has shifted in a more systematic and concerted manner towards the
exploration of the ethical implications and human rights considerations associated
with preserving data privacy within research that is inherently informed by
surveillance practices. This newfound interest stems from various interconnected
sources. In part, it represents a growing recognition and acknowledgment of the
paramount importance of safeguarding data privacy in the current age of
information and the sheer complexity of the multifaceted challenges that arise in
relation to it, as well as the eclectic range of ethical considerations that are
inevitably intertwined. Furthermore, this evolving interest also reflects the
pervasive discourses surrounding surveillance and data privacy that have emerged
as a direct response to the remarkable expansion and advancement of surveillance
technologies witnessed over the past two decades or so. It has led to an amplified
perception that invasions of data privacy possess the potential to have far-reaching
and immensely detrimental consequences, thereby instilling apprehension that
research practices may inadvertently clash with the core principles of respecting
and preserving individual data privacy rights. However, upon reviewing the
extensive body of literature available on this subject matter, it becomes apparent

4|Page
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
that the articulation of the ethical issues at hand constitutes a highly complex and
intricate task. The debate surrounding these matters encompasses an extensive
corpus of divergent and often incongruous opinions that appear to show scant
indication of converging towards a harmonious consensus any time in the near
future. This perpetual lack of consensus inevitably instills a degree of trepidation
among individuals who operate within the confines of the current highly charged
ethical climate. At a policy level, the glaring absence of a shared understanding and
universally applicable rules is erroneously perceived by some as functioning to
legitimize and justify pervasive incursions into the realm of personal privacy. This
misinterpretation tends to exacerbate the existing concerns and heighten the overall
sense of urgency in addressing these critical ethical dilemmas head-on.
Consequently, it is imperative that rigorous efforts are undertaken to bridge the
existing gaps and foster a more holistic understanding of the intricate relationship
between surveillance, data privacy, and ethical considerations. Such endeavors must
ultimately strive to establish a well-defined and universally accepted framework
that adequately safeguards data privacy in research conducted within the
perimeters of a surveillance-informed paradigm. Only through such a
comprehensive and concerted approach can a harmonious equilibrium be achieved,
ensuring the preservation of individual rights and the promotion of ethical practices
in an inherently interconnected and digitized world. This imperative underscores
the pressing need for interdisciplinary collaboration among scholars, policymakers,
legal experts, technology developers, and civil society organizations to collectively
address the challenges posed by surveillance technologies and their impact on data
privacy. By engaging in constructive dialogue, rigorous research, and proactive
engagement with stakeholders, it is possible to pave the way for a future where
surveillance technologies are leveraged responsibly, with due consideration for the
ethical dimensions of data privacy. The development of innovative solutions,
informed by the principles of transparency, accountability, and respect for
individual autonomy, is essential to navigate the complex terrain of surveillance in
the digital age. In conclusion, as surveillance technologies continue to evolve and
permeate various aspects of our lives, it is crucial to foster a robust ethical
framework that balances the potential benefits of surveillance with the preservation
of individual privacy and fundamental rights. This requires a comprehensive
understanding of the multifaceted challenges, interdisciplinary collaboration, and
the development of principled guidelines that serve as a compass to guide
responsible and ethical practices in the realm of surveillance. Only in this way can
we embrace the potential of surveillance technologies while upholding the values
and principles that underpin our democratic societies.

5|Page
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
2.2. Ethical Implications of Surveillance
Private digital information can provide valuable insights into large-scale human
activities that are of extensive public interest. These interests often involve the
social, political, and economic aspects of human collectives. With the rapid
advancement of technology and the proliferation of internet usage, internet data has
become an increasingly valuable source for extensive research, serving both public
and commercial interests. The advantages of using the internet as a social research
tool are multifold, thanks to the wide range of topics and the broad scope of scale
that can be explored. However, researchers analyzing publicly available internet
data face a common challenge: the data often contains concealed individual
characteristics of the human subjects who generate it. These concealed traces, while
necessary for the creation of large datasets, pose difficulties in terms of subject
identification. Nonetheless, despite the inability to directly identify the subjects,
researchers are far from disconnected. In fact, the datasets continue to expand
exponentially, evolving in a way that allows for unexpected inferences to be made
about the identities of the subjects. It is crucial to recognize that anyone who creates
a dataset based on internet material, be it a company, an academic institution, a
research institute, a citizen, or even an individual, encounters a multitude of ethical
problems associated with accessing internet data. These complex ethical dilemmas
are collectively referred to as the "ethics of big data" and have become a subject of
wide-ranging discussion, leading to public debates, legislative struggles, and
interdisciplinary learning opportunities in various fields. The study of these ethical
concerns transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries and extends into diverse
domains such as computer science, sociology, data science, data privacy, philosophy,
law, and big data ethics. This interdisciplinary approach has become essential in
effectively addressing the complex ethical challenges arising from the utilization of
big data. By fostering collaboration between these fields, researchers are better
equipped to navigate the intricate web of ethical considerations that arise from the
collection, analysis, and use of internet data. In conclusion, the exploration and
utilization of private digital information for research purposes offers immense
potential, but it also necessitates a deep understanding of the ethics surrounding big
data. As technological capabilities and internet usage continue to evolve, it is
imperative that researchers, policymakers, and society as a whole carefully consider
and address the ethical implications of accessing and utilizing internet data. Only
through thoughtful and comprehensive interdisciplinary approaches can we ensure
the responsible and ethical use of big data for the betterment of society as a whole.

6|Page
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
3. Ethics of Data Collection and Use
Data collection has become a crucial part of expansion for businesses in a data
driven economy. As social interactions increasingly move online, social media and
other internet services have started collecting users’ private data. When it comes to
processed data, information leakage might occur either through deliberate release
(or sell) of certain data fields or through indirect correlations. Thus, the right ethical
principles must underpin a data collection effort to ensure it is done correctly. Data
collection is often an evaluative process that involves both qualitative and
quantitative approaches. On one hand, qualitative approaches focus on the ‘why’ of
data collection to generate acceptability of designed data. The issue of ethics and
how it guides the understanding of data collection is discussed in this paper.
Recognizing the ethics of data collection would assure a basic framework on ethical
data management in both research and business.

Compliance with local laws and regulations is the first key principle. Data should not
be collected or used if prohibited by local laws, rules or regulations. Moreover, most
countries have adopted or are in the process of adopting data privacy or protection
laws regulating the collection and use of personal data [5]. Data privacy laws usually
define personal data, determine what constitutes lawful processing of personal data,
identify the rights of the data subject regarding the data collected about him or her,
and define the responsibilities and obligations of the controller and processor of any
personal data. Generally, prior to collection and use of any personal data it is
necessary to (1) determine whether applicable local data privacy laws will apply,
and (2) ensure compliance with such laws. A related principle is compliance with
the privacy policies of the data provider or data subject, which should address
similar issues but will be specific to the terms and conditions applying to a
particular data subject, data provider, data set, or data collection effort. In all cases
where personal data is collected or used, it would be advisable to seek legal counsel
because of the many issues, requirements and protections established by laws or
contracts that must be observed [1].

3.1. Principles of Ethical Data Collection

Ethics have remained a touchy and complex field of research, eliciting myriad
discussions and debates. Gaymard, a prominent scholar, opines that delving into the
cultural ideas of good and evil has nevertheless given rise to a rich and often
enthralling body of literature. This extensive literary corpus constitutes a
substantial portion of the esteemed canon of western philosophy. It encompasses a
diverse range of philosophies and ideologies, spanning from the venerable sayings
of Confucius to the modern principles of utilitarianism. Even the profound insights
of figures like St. Thomas Aquinas and the prescriptive ethics of nations like

7|Page
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
Botswana or Bolivia find their place within this comprehensive collection. Values,
which lay the foundation for ethical behavior and the subsequent declaration of
these values, have emerged as defining characteristics of human societies.
Regardless of the constraints of time or location, societies engage in an enduring
discourse regarding what is deemed acceptable versus unacceptable behavior.
These contemplations are central to the continuous process of shaping and
reshaping cultural identities. In various fields, endeavors have been made to identify
values that are thought to underpin scientific inquiry and progress. While primarily
applicable to data science, one might find value in exploring the ethical values
delineated in the esteemed document of the National Academy of Sciences. These
universally esteemed values include truth, objectivity, integrity, openness, fairness,
and respect for human life and welfare. Serving as aspirational ideals, these
principles encapsulate the moral compass by which scientists ought to navigate,
irrespective of whether or not they manifest themselves uniformly across the
scientific community. Aligning closely with the scientific enterprise, numerous
attempts have also been made within the realm of data science to elicit and
prioritize values. One notable example is the significance attributed to these values
in relation to industry practices. The dialogue surrounding the intersection of ethics
and technological advancements has ignited a thoughtful examination of the ethical
implications within data science. Researchers and industry professionals alike have
been engaged in discussions and reflections on the ethical considerations specific to
data-driven decision-making. It is within these dynamic conversations that the true
potential for aligning values with the scientific enterprise in data science is
unleashed, thus paving the way for an ethically conscious and responsible future. [2]

3.2. Ethical Use of Data in Research and Business

The representation of private and sensitive data often falls under the expansive
umbrella of personal and professional expectations. Respecting one’s privacy is
considered the quintessential essence of ethical behavior, encompassing a multitude
of interconnected and multifaceted considerations. Thoughtfulness, cordiality,
bravery, empathy, and respect are just a few of the diverse, intricate connections
that immediately spring to mind when an individual contemplates the complex
realm of ethics. In the vast and intricate realm of academic literature, ethics is
commonly regarded as a set of guiding norms, principles, or standards of conduct,
which experts meticulously utilize to scrutinize the behavior of an individual, an
organization, or, more broadly, to ascertain the fundamental difference between
right and wrong. In research and business settings, the intricate web of data
ownership and its meticulous utilization is closely intertwined. Ethically conducted
research, marketing endeavors, and business ventures are held in high esteem, as
their outcomes possess a direct and meaningful connection with the people who

8|Page
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
ardently pursue them. In the realm of research, ownership is often transferred to
the financing organization or to the individual researcher, distancing it from the
originating research institution. However, while ownership may change hands,
concerns and rights pertaining to the data collected steadfastly remain with the
original institution. In accordance with stringent ethical standards, the misuse of
research data collected on human subjects, such as divulging interviews or allowing
unauthorized third parties to peruse confidential files, is unequivocally
impermissible. Particularly in the healthcare domain, research data collected on
humans are infused with a high degree of sensitivity, both on a personal and
professional level. Consequently, utmost care must be taken to prevent any form of
deliberate or unintentional misuse. Numerous recommendations have been put
forth to ensure the ethical utilization of research data collected on human subjects.
These include comprehensive gathering of relevant information, the diligent
submission of an approval request for data collection and operations, meticulous
documentation and archival of approval processes, as well as the establishment of
stringent contracts for hired researchers. As per the strict rules and guidelines
governing ethical conduct, it is imperative that these recommendations be closely
adhered to in order to uphold ethical integrity and accountability. [6][1]

4. Bias and Discrimination in Data Analysis: Uncovering

the Inherent Prejudices within the Analytical Process
[7] [8]

4.1. Sources of Bias in Data Analysis

Data can be affected by bias in several ways, leading to both advantageous and
disadvantageous outcomes for different groups or individuals. Bias in the data
context refers to a situation where the data represents an unfair aspect of diversity
in a distorted manner, presenting an inaccurate view of reality. It is essential to
acknowledge that bias can already exist within the data even before it influences
any analysis. In fact, the presence of data bias can significantly alter the conclusions
drawn from the analysis of that data. Consequently, it becomes paramount to
address bias right from the beginning of any study, specifically during the phase of
data generation and collection. Among the various types of data bias, historical bias,
exclusion bias, interpretation bias, and data noise bias can be identified. Historical
bias originates from the prevailing practices of data generation and collection
processes. Data is primarily obtained at the crossroads of everyday activities, social
practices, and institutions that operate under existing policies, often relying on
affordable sensing devices. Recognizing historical bias necessitates a retrospective
understanding of the application and data generation process across time. Following

9|Page
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
data collection, data cleansing emerges as a crucial phase in the data science
lifecycle. It involves the ethical perspective of removing corrupt or unethical data, as
this step holds immense importance. Failing to address exclusion bias could lead to
its emergence, whereby data handlers fail to identify and eliminate undesired
segments of data. [9][7]

4.2. Ethical Approaches to Addressing Bias and Discrimination

[10]. These include auditing, reviewing, re-motivating data analysis, and regular
consultation in the context of specific data analysis projects. DADM believes that
fairness is always relative and context dependent, and these decisions must be made
collectively. In on-going work, DADM seeks to develop advanced techniques for the
detection, investigation, and careful consideration of fairness that can aid this type
of collective behaviour. It poses technical and process-related elements to consider
when dealing with fairness from a model development, use or post-modeling
perspective. The approach to discrimination-aware data mining, incorporated into
the data science stack as another type of analysis, strongly emphasizes the need for
fairness to be rigorously considered at the very inception of algorithm
design/model development/user specifications. Whether and how to intervene,
once something is in operation, is heavily influenced by political or managerial
considerations rather than purely technical issues. There are clearly defined points
at which it is crucially important to intervene, and to potentially teach practitioners
how and when to intervene in order to mitigate unfair outcomes. Implementation of
the concept of fairness requires careful consideration of various criteria and
defining trade-offs. Preconditions and safeguards are absolutely necessary to
prevent any form of discrimination within clusters and in the broader population-
wide recommendations. Some of these requirements can be described holistically
but could potentially be incorporated into a model, allowing for iterative
experimentation. Such clustering and analysis could be performed dynamically, with
the model constantly updating based on incremental changes of the actors involved.
However, it is of utmost importance to ensure the robustness of the criteria used,
and conduct sensitivity analyses with regard to preference weights to fully
understand the impact of different weighting schemes. The plans for applying the
results of these experiments have not entirely emerged but are highly relevant in
the context of attempting to thoroughly analyze and address biases of unfair
clustering before they potentially occur and perpetuate inequity. [11]

5. Conclusion
This paper reviewed the implications and potential negative consequences of
violating data privacy, highlighted the legislative developments aimed to protect
user rights, and extensively examined potential issues that arise when adhering to

10 | P a g e
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
data privacy laws. Emerging commercial trends like data-as-service and the
collection, ownership, and use of data in artificial intelligence and big data
ecosystems pose complex and multifaceted ethical challenges regarding whether
specific types and assets of data should remain private. The unprecedented use of
data at incredibly large scales, with remarkable variety and depth, employing
increasingly sophisticated technologies, emphasizes the need for commensurate
precautions to protect the data subject's rights. Ensuring that the data is solely
derived from subjects who have given their fully informed consent is not always
feasible, especially when dealing with high-dimensional data that includes
observations taken from living in a smart city as well as users of an app. Moreover,
the process of obtaining fully informed consent itself faces significant challenges, as
it can leave individuals uncertain about privacy and data protection laws and
practices, imposing substantial responsibilities on them. Nevertheless, as a means of
preserving ethical standards and data protection regulations in software
development, engineers could potentially include a robust function into a social
media app that exclusively identifies counterparts for legitimately consented data to
be used, if the owner insists. Implementing such a feature could save future
problems, such as the infamous Cambridge Analytical scandal. By taking
responsibility in this manner, one can also ensure that the potential misuse of
technology as a tool for social control through privacy intrusion will gradually
diminish, leading to a more secure digital environment for all.

5.1. Summary of Key Points

This article thoroughly delves into the intricate ethical implications surrounding
data privacy, providing a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter. Within the
realm of data privacy, we not only distinguish the boundaries but also address the
distinct concerns related to data protection and informational privacy. Privacy,
being an inherently elusive concept, encompasses various aspects such as control,
access, power, and the way these elements are perceived and exercised. These
normative dimensions fundamentally reflect philosophical ponderings, delving into
issues related to knowledge, self, and personhood, encompassing both human
individuals and data entities. Consequently, we establish a multidimensional
perspective, expanding the privacy argument into uncharted territories. In addition
to considering the impact on individuals who actively seek privacy, it is paramount
to scrutinize the intentions of those who possess the power to influence the
resulting consequences. This becomes especially crucial as societal shifts and
transformative changes continue to disrupt long-standing privacy practices. It is
essential to recognize that the ethical concerns surrounding data collection extend
beyond the information gathered itself, which aligns with the commonly associated
apprehensions regarding intrusive journalism and state surveillance. It

11 | P a g e
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
encompasses not only what is accessible or what can be studied, but also the
implications and inferences that can be drawn or generated from the collected data.
Furthermore, a broad spectrum of stakeholders plays a pivotal role in the intricate
mechanisms of data management and bears varying degrees of responsibility.
Myriad agents act as facilitators, serving the interests of democratic states or
commercial enterprises, and their actions significantly impact the rights and welfare
of individuals and groups. Different sets of players inevitably experience distinct
consequences in relation to the legitimacy or value attributed to the organization
responsible for handling and processing the data. In this regard, comprehensive
rules and regulations may be implemented to establish stringent barriers
safeguarding against manipulation, misuse, and abuse of data. However, the
enforcement and assessment of compliance in a manner that is both public and
transparent present unprecedented and challenging predicaments.

5.2. Future Directions in Ethical Data Privacy

Institutional Review Board decisions do not statically shape the state of methods
and data use in research, and often ethical leadership in identifying new concerns in
research falls to participants themselves, as well as advocates who encourage and
rely upon researchers to report caveats in findings. Addressing the number and
quality of privacy aversions could well mean a greater reliance on participants, and
a greater reliance on their advocates in partnering with data scientists and using
principles and practice to develop both proper analytics as well as sound
methodological and ethical frameworks for performing data science. A data ethic
that is not just any mental policy but a group of ethical guidelines concerned with
what one actually does in data science as well as its larger implications for society.
Balancing data access with privacy, informed consent, and compensation are all
goals of both principles and practice of ethical, informed data sharing. One can
imagine data ethics being explicitly presented as a growing and available space of
ethical considerations: just as one talks about digital sections and AI ethics, one
might well talk about data ethical sections. This space of debate and action could
well take place in the often taken for granted space of local research infrastructure
support within universities, the research as well as information technology units,
social science computing groups, digital research services, and other central and
serving research units that share the Federated community model, often reflect
differences from one another in their structural contribution to the institution in
consideration. We should think deeply about these considerations and create
resources and forums for how work would be privacy par changes from disciplinary
arching becomes privacy pure. Socially responsible data use requires prompt
attention to consider how the relationship between privacy respect and information
analysis is managed. As we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of research ethics,

12 | P a g e
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
it becomes increasingly clear that Institutional Review Board decisions do not
simply dictate the state of methods and data utilization in the field. Instead, the
responsibility of identifying and addressing ethical concerns in research often falls
upon the shoulders of the participants themselves, alongside advocates who
tirelessly encourage researchers to report any limitations or caveats in their
findings. This collaborative approach to ethical leadership signifies a significant shift
in the way we view and engage with research practices. Moreover, in our quest to
enhance privacy protections and ensure the quality of research outcomes, it is
crucial to recognize the value of participant engagement. Embracing a participant-
centric approach not only fosters greater trust and reliance on their insights but also
cultivates strong partnerships with data scientists. Together, participants and data
scientists can leverage ethical principles and innovative methodologies to develop
robust analytics frameworks that prioritize both accuracy and integrity while
upholding ethical standards. By adopting a comprehensive data ethic, we move
beyond mere policies and guidelines and delve into the realm of profound ethical
considerations within the practice of data science itself. Such an ethos directs our
attention not only to what one should do within the field but also to the broader
societal implications of our actions. A harmonious balance between data
accessibility and privacy, informed consent, and fair compensation remains a
principal objective in the ethical landscape of data sharing, guided by both
principles and practical applications. In envisioning the future, we may witness the
explicit presentation of data ethics as a dynamic and ever-expanding domain of
ethical deliberations. Similar to the discussions surrounding digital sections and AI
ethics, data ethical sections could emerge as a prominent discourse within our
academic and research institutions. These dedicated spaces for debate and action
ought to be nurtured within the often-underappreciated research infrastructure
support network, comprising university departments, information technology units,
social science computing groups, and digital research services. While these entities
share the Federated community model, it is essential to acknowledge and embrace
their unique contributions and structural variances that enrich the ethical landscape
of the institution at hand. As we ponder upon these crucial considerations, it is
imperative that we robustly invest in resources and establish open forums for
dialogue. Creating platforms to delve deep into privacy paradigms enables us to
navigate from disciplinary arching to privacy purity. In order to ensure socially
responsible data usage, proactive measures must be taken to carefully manage the
delicate interplay between privacy considerations and information analysis. Only
through these concerted efforts can we truly uphold privacy respect while
extracting valuable insights from data.

References:

13 | P a g e
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad
[1] Y. Coppieters and A. Levêque, "Ethics, privacy and the legal framework
governing medical data: opportunities or threats for biomedical and public health
research?," 2013. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

[2] D. J. Hand, "Aspects of Data Ethics in a Changing World: Where Are We Now?,"
2018. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

[3] O. J. Gstrein and A. Beaulieu, "How to protect privacy in a datafied society? A

presentation of multiple legal and conceptual approaches," 2022. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

[4] F. K. Dankar, "Practices and challenges in clinical data sharing," 2023. [PDF]

[5] N. Weber and B. Locke, "Ethics of Open Data," 2022. [PDF]

[6] M. Favaretto, E. De Clercq, J. Gaab, and B. Simone Elger, "First do no harm: An

exploration of researchers’ ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies," 2020.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

[7] D. A. Ho and O. Beyan, "Biases in Data Science Lifecycle," 2020. [PDF]

[8] X. Ferrer, T. van Nuenen, J. M. Such, M. Coté et al., "Bias and Discrimination in AI:
a cross-disciplinary perspective," 2020. [PDF]

[9] C. Criscuolo, T. Dolci, and M. Salnitri, "Towards Assessing Data Bias in Clinical
Trials," 2022. [PDF]

[10] M. Veale and R. Binns, "Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating
discrimination without collecting sensitive data," 2017. osf.io

[11] X. Wang, Y. Cheng Wu, X. Ji, and H. Fu, "Algorithmic discrimination: examining
its types and regulatory measures with emphasis on US legal practices," 2024.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

14 | P a g e
*This note is Prepared by Dr. Firoj Ahamad