Design Guidance Recommendations For Food Contact Grade PET Bottles
Design Guidance Recommendations For Food Contact Grade PET Bottles
recommendations for
food contact grade
PET bottles
Copyright © 2022 Confederation of Indian Industry (CII). Published by CII. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in, or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), in part or full in any manner
whatsoever, or translated into any language, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. CII has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information and material presented in this document. Nonetheless, all
information, estimates and opinions contained in this publication are subject to change without notice, and do not constitute professional advice in any manner. Neither CII nor any of its office bearers or analysts or employees accept
or assume any responsibility or liability in respect of the information provided herein. However, any discrepancy or error found in this publication may please be brought to the notice of CII for appropriate correction.
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Contents
List of abbreviations
OPS oriented polystyrene film
AA acetaldehyde
PEN polyethylene naphthalate
BIS Bureau of Indian Standards
PE polyethylene
BOPP biaxially oriented PP film
PET polyethylene terephthalate
CSD carbonated soft drink
4
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
1
PlastIndia Foundation. (2019). Indian Plastics Industry Report 2019. https://www.plastindia.org/plastic-industry-status-report.php
2
Research and Markets. (2022). India PET Resin Market Analysis. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5028726/india-pet-resin-market-analysis-plant-capacity
3
BIS. (1998). IS 14534 (1998): Guidelines for recycling of plastics. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S11/is.14534.1998.pdf
4
NCL Innovations. (n.d.). PET Recycling in India Understanding PET recycling in India. http://www.petrecycling.in/pet-recycling-in-india/
5
Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. (2022). File No: STD/SC/A – 40. https://fssai.gov.in/upload/advisories/2022/01/61e7acd01a850Direction_Recycled_Plastics_19_01_2022.pdf
5
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
6
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
6
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2020). New Plastics Economy Global Commitment: Commitments, Vision and Definitions. https://emf.thirdlight.com/link/pq2algvgnv1n-uitck8/@/preview/1?o
7
‘In practice’ means that within each of these regions, the recycling system (end-to-end system from consumer to recycled material) effectively recycles a significant share of all packaging of that type put on the market. In other words, in that area a significant recycling
rate is achieved for that type of packaging
8
‘At scale’ means that the proof needs to be more than a lab test, a pilot, or a single small region. It means that recycling of a certain packaging type needs to be proven to work in practice in multiple regions, collectively representing a significant geographical area in
terms of population size, ideally across different country and city archetypes. This to indicate that the recycling in practice is replicable, and that the design of the packaging is not the barrier to realise recycling in practice in other countries.
7
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
8
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
9
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
9
Small size bottles are easy to collect from point sources of waste generation (such as restaurants or banquet halls), but collection is not viable when they are littered.
10
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Figure 4: Large size PET cans After the trommel, bottles pass through a magnet which step carried out at large (greater than 10,000 ton per
removes metal parts such as rings and caps. They then month capacity) recycling facilities.
enter a manual sorting bay, where any other remaining
plastic/metal parts, coloured bottles and labels are Large size PET cans/jars of capacity 5 L to 20 L are used
removed. The next step is automated sorting of material for edible oil and packaged drinking water for home or
using laser or other kind of detection, where bottles multi-serve use. At material recovery facilities, these are
with a small surface area can escape detection and cut into pieces before baling to prevent jamming conveyor
get ejected. streams in the recycling process. Also, during the
automated sorting process, their separation by air jets is
In the Indian context, most of the initial sorting is difficult owing to their bulk size and weight.
manual at street level, and automated sorting is a final
The table below provides the detailed container dimensions and capacities commonly used in the Indian beverage industry.
11
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
12
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
This additional requirement to sort, segregate and store The Bureau of Indian Standards10 and an FSSAI 2005
PET by colour leads to higher operational costs regulation had restricted the use of opaque and dark
(manpower and storage) for traders and MRFs. Coloured coloured PET for packaging water, but recently, in
bottles are sold at a different price point in the market January 202211, the FSSAI issued a notification amending
and each colour has its own demand-supply dynamics, this standard, and lifting the restriction. While large
but typically sold at lower prices than clear bottles. For companies are unlikely to change their practices as a
these reasons, colours should be avoided, or minimised result of this amendment, smaller companies might
as they tend to contaminate the recycled PET stream and begin using coloured PET as a convenient way to
impact the clarity of rPET resin. distinguish their brands from others’. Due to this there is
a chance of increased number of coloured PET bottles in
Fillers such as calcium carbonate, hamper the the market. This might lead to higher operational costs
recyclability of PET bottles by reducing the transparency at MRFs for sorting and might increase the likelihood of
of flakes obtained after melting. coloured PET bottles remaining uncollected.
10
BIS. (2005). Manual for Packaged Drinking Water (Doc No.: SM/IS14543/01). Available at: https://bis.gov.in/qazwsx/cmd/water_manual.pdf
11
FSSAI. (2022). Food Safety and Standards (Packaging) First Amendment Regulations, 2022 (F.No. Std/SP-08/A-1.2019/N-01). https://fssai.gov.in/upload/notifications/2022/01/61f2431e10029Gazette_Notification_Water_27_01_2022.pdf
12
In the Indian market, there is a large proportion of PET bottles with green tint. This should not be a challenge if these are collected, sorted and recycled separately. Please note, green color is a challenge, but green tints are not.
13
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Figure 5: Schematic showing the difference between coatings, multilayer and blended barriers
Source: Nakaya, M., Uedono, A., & Hotta, A. (2015). Recent Progress in Gas Barrier Thin Film Coatings on PET
Bottles in Food and Beverage Applications. Coatings, 5(4), 987-1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings5040987)
13
Resource Recycling, Inc. (2019). Company unveils RPET bottle with recycling-friendly barrier coating. Plastics Recycling Update. Resource-recycling.com rPET bottle with recycling friendly barrier coating
14
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Additives
PET resins contain chemical However, the use of special functional types of make PET material degradable (via the action of
compounds or additives to improve additives, such as ultraviolet (UV) stabilisers, ultraviolet radiation or heat to reduce molecular
acetaldehyde (AA) blockers and oxygen scavengers mass). These additives hamper recycling15 by
the processing performance, must be evaluated to ensure that they do not impact breaking down PET molecular chains during
functionality and ageing properties of the colour and odour of rPET or produce off-taste in extrusion, reducing the internal viscosity of rPET
the polymer.14 The most commonly the contents. and thereby its quality. Bottles with and without
used additives are antioxidants, light oxo-degradable additives are identical in
Degradation-promoting additives (termed appearance: they cannot be distinguished by
and heat stabilizers, toners for pro-oxidant additives) are sometimes added to manual sorters or automatic sorting methods.16
controlling yellowing, and fast reheat
additives: these are used in very low
quantities (0.001% (10 ppm) to 0.1% Table 5: Design guidance for use of additives
(1,000 ppm)) and do not affect the
quality of rPET. Recycling-friendly Conditional Problematic for recycling
Antioxidants, thermal stabilizers Optical brighteners, AA blockers, Bio/oxo/photo degradable additives
UV stabilisers, O2 scavengers
14
Hahladakis, J., Velis, C., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., & Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. Journal Of Hazardous Materials, 344, 179-199.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.014
15
New Plastics Economy. (n.d.). Oxo-degradable plastic packaging statement. https://ecostandard.org/wp-content/uploads/oxo-statement.pdf
16
Same as above
15
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
16
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Caps and closures As the rim of the aluminium lid is seamed The use of aluminium metal (density
to the PET body, the metal ring remains 2.7 g/cm3) should be avoided, as these
with the PET container body when such settle under water along with PET flakes,
Figure 7: Typical examples of two-piece, single-piece and tethered caps lids are opened by the consumer and do separated in sink-float tanks, and are
not make for recycle-friendly closures. carried though the entire recycling
Waste-pickers and material recovery process, leaving metal residues in the final
facilities try to increase the weight of rPET product. They may also damage the
material sold to traders/recyclers and shredder blades, and block the extruder
collect these containers together with PET filter mesh/screen.
beverage bottles.
Table 6: Caps and closure types commonly used in Indian FMCG industry
Roll-on pilfer-proof (ROPP) aluminium caps when opened, leave
behind a metal band around the bottle neck and do not make PET Products Primary choice
bottles easy to recycle. Dairy/juices Single-piece HDPE closures
ROPP caps are commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry; Carbonated soft drinks Single-piece HDPE (liner less) are preferable
Two-piece PP closures with polyethylene (PE)/
while packaging has largely shifted to PET bottles from glass
ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) liners
without requiring changes in the bottle filling lines, aluminium
capping machines continue to be used. Also, aluminium caps are Water Single-piece HDPE closures
easier to print on which make them the preferred choice.
Pharmaceutical ROPP aluminium cap with expanded polyethylene (EPE) liner
Figure 8: Typical examples of metal caps and closures Liquor ROPP aluminium cap with EPE liner
PET can for liquid Aluminium can lids
17
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
18
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Table 7: Design guidance for caps, closures, liners, seals and valves
Liners, seals PE/EVA/PP foamed PE/PET liner Paper/silicone swimming Neck foils metal/PVC/silicone with
and valves valves with density <1g/cm3 density >1 g/cm3
19
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
20
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
The following factors about labels should also be considered from the To enhance recyclability, labels/sleeves should be easily detachable from the
perspective of recycling PET bottles: bottle and separable from PET flakes by specific gravity (density) separation
in flotation tanks or air separators. They should not leave adhesive and ink
Label material residue on the bottles. Under Indian conditions, workers at all levels avoid
the tedious work of removing labels, so they remain attached to the bottle,
Adhesive right up to the recycler, who has to pay extra for their removal. However, the
practice varies and roughly 50% of the time, labels will be removed by hand
Printing ink before bottles reach the recycler.
21
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Label material
1. Wraparound labels are generally made 2. Shrink sleeve labels are generally made of PVC, c. PLA material is similar to PET and is difficult
of biaxially-oriented polypropylene polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PET-G), for manual sorters to differentiate at MRFs
(BOPP) films. BOPP WA labels cover only polylactic acid (PLA) and oriented polystyrene and recyclers. NIR sorting technology, used by
a part of the PET bottle, exposing a (OPS) film. These films have a density greater than large-volume recyclers, and making up about
significant portion which allows that of water and hence sink in water along with 50% of recycling in India, can detect and
automatic sorting cameras to sense the PET bottle flakes, making it difficult to separate separate PLA from PET. PLA has a density of
bottle surface. PET bottles used for the two. In addition, all these film materials have a 1.24 g/cm3, and sinks with PET flakes in the
packaging water or carbonated soft negative impact on PET recycling, because their sink-float tank.18 PLA has a low melting point,
drinks use BOPP WA labels with a film melting points are lower than those of PET flakes 170°C and starts to soften at 60°C. Thus, when
density in the range of 0.55 to 0.90 g/cm³. and carry printing inks, which discolours the rPET. PET flakes are dried, any PLA material
These labels float in the sink-float tank, Foamed PET labels are also available in small contaminants will degrade and lead to
and do not impact the PET recycling quantities, Which have density less than that of yellowing of rPET. PLA fragments become
processes. For these reasons WA labels water and hence can be separated in the sticky, resulting in an agglomeration of flakes
are the most acceptable and sink-float tanks. and can affect the extrusion process.
recycling-friendly label materials. a. PVC small concentrations of PVC (50 ppm =
Metallised BOPP films are sometimes 0.005%, that is, 0.05 kg of PVC in 1,000 kg of 3. Stretch labels use PE based films, with a density
used as label material but they may get PET flakes), have a negative impact on PET below 1 g/cm3. Once shredded, they can be readily
rejected and hence should be avoided. bottle recycling17. The melt temperature of PVC removed during the sink-float density separation
is much lower than that of PET. This means that stage and are therefore PET recycling-friendly.
at the temperatures applied during drying,
extrusion and SSP of rPET, PVC contamination 4. PSA labels use PE, PP, PET or paper-based
degrades and releases hydrochloric acid (HCl) substrates (film) with either water-based acrylic
and chemically breaks down the PET polymer or solvent-based rubber adhesives. With regard
chains. The decomposed PVC creates yellow or to PSA labels, it is highly desirable to use films
brown discolourations and black spots in the that float in water and that can be separated
final rPET, which result in an unacceptable and from PET (sinks in water). The use of PSA paper
inferior rPET material. labels is not desirable, as any remaining paper
fibres can lead to surface defects and very small,
b. PET-G films do not release HCl, but PET-G has sometimes microscopic holes, known as
the same density as PET flakes and hence sinks pinholes, during the blow-moulding of bottles
and mixes with PET flakes in sink-float tank. using rPET resin.
17
Alaerts, L., Augustinus, M., & Van Acker, K. (2018). Impact of Bio-Based Plastics on Current Recycling of Plastics. Sustainability, 10(5), 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051487
18
Same as above
22
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Label material
In India, all high-volume (sales) Paper labels can be readily removed from PET bottles by may necessitate more water changes during the sink-float
packaged drinking water brands wetting the label in water in the label stripper unit of process.
use BOPP wrap-around labels with recycling plants. However, the removal efficiency
hot melt glue only on the lap joint. depends on the type of adhesive used, with water-based Paper labels are not commonly used in India and if they are
Regional brands, with low-speed adhesives easy to wash off, therefore allowing full labels to be used at all, they should be made of high wet strength
filling lines and manual labelling, to be removed without tearing. Paper labels with paper, to reduce tear off and thus the obstruction to
use PVC shrink sleeve labelling rubber-based adhesives or hot melt adhesives (HMA) recycling.
material. are unsuitable because they may tear into small pieces
and any paper remaining stuck to the PET flakes will PET bottles of premium water brands and non-food brands
Most juice and dairy brands use burn during drying and extrusion, contaminating rPET often use PSA labels of PET, PP, PVC, PE and paper
shrink sleeve labels, irrespective of flakes/pellets with black specks. Use of paper labels material.
the filling line speed while
high-volume brands have moved
from PVC shrink sleeve material to Table 8: Design guidance for labels
PET-G material. Local brands still
prefer PVC film, because it is Label type Recycling-friendly Conditional Problematic for recycling
cheaper than PET-G film.
Wraparound HDPE/medium density polyethylene Paper labels, metallic foils Pressure sensitive labels,
Paper can be used for a variety of labels (MDPE)/LDPE/LLDPE/PP/OPP label PVC/PS/paper/metallised labels
label styles for beverage bottles: with density <1 g/cm3 with density >1 g/cm2
single-piece wraparound labels,
two-piece front and back labels, Shrink Material density <1 g/cm3 with Materials with density PVC/PS/PLA/PET-G, other material with
and some pressure sensitive sleeve labels perforations and revealing >30% <1 g/cm3 without density >1 g/cm3. Difficult to remove and/or
adhesive labels. Paper labels are of bottle surface area perforations and revealing NIR sort with heavy ink coverage
used mostly for food containers <30% of PET bottle
packaging products such as
mayonnaise, sauces, pickles,
edible oil, and alcoholic beverages, Stretch Sleeves of PE/foamed PET with Sleeves of PE/foamed PET
all of which are collected in the sleeve labels density <1 g/cm3 and revealing (density <1 g/cm3) <30%
PET bottle stream. >30% of bottle surface area of bottle
23
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Adhesives
Wrap-around BOPP labels use Although only a very small amount of adhesive is operations. Adhesives classified as ‘good’ have
HMAs while pressure-sensitive required on a label, removing it adds a significant amount removal rates greater than 90%19.
adhesive (PSA) labels use to the cost of recycling. Adhesives that wash off cleanly
water-based acrylic emulsions, from PET and remain adhered to the label substrate are The Association of Post-Consumer Plastic
solvent-based rubber solutions, or preferred as are adhesives that wash off easily in the hot Recyclers (APR) and the European PET Bottle
HMA. Paper labels (pre-cut or caustic wash at temperatures below 80°C (and preferably Platform (EPBP) have developed testing protocols
wrap-around) use water-based below 65°C), without leaving any residue on the PET for adhesive manufacturers and packaging
acrylic emulsion or starch flake. The separated label pieces should not become producers to evaluate the impact of adhesive
adhesives. tacky/sticky after they are removed from the washing products in PET recycling systems20,21,22. All label
bath otherwise they may adhere to washed PET flakes adhesives should be evaluated using these testing
contaminating and discolouring them. methods since all adhesives are imported except
for some water-based emulsions, which are
Plastics Recyclers Europe (PRE) has issued a list of made in India.
hot-melt adhesives acceptable for mechanical recycling
19
EuPR. (2001). Positive Glue list. www.epbp.org/download/297/eupr-positive-glue-list
20
http://www.plasticsrecycling.org/technical_resources/testing/pet_flake_contamination_test.asp
21
EPBP. (n.d.) Downloads. https://www.epbp.org/page/8/layout-link-5-downloads
22
APR. (n.d.). Labels, Inks, Adhesives. https://plasticsrecycling.org/labels-inks-adhesives
23
Packshop. (n.d.). Shrink Sleeves. https://www.packshop.in/shrink-sleeves.php
24
European PET Bottle Platform. (2017). Quick Test QT 507 - Bleeding label. https://www.epbp.org/download/318/qt-507-label-bleeding
24
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Printing inks
24
European PET Bottle Platform. (2017). Quick Test QT 507 - Bleeding label. https://www.epbp.org/download/318/qt-507-label-bleeding
25
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Conclusions
Brand owners base the PET plastics recycling has great market potential
selection of closures, material for recyclers, but its success depends completely
on the decisions of packaging designers, brand
colours, and label materials for owners and packaging converters. All these
bottles on a number of factors, stakeholders must look beyond the bottle itself and
but perhaps the most consider the impact of components such as labels,
influential of these is consumer inks and closures on the recycling stream. PET
recycling value and efficiency can be maximized by
appeal which makes the brands promoting the use of components that are
lean towards highly decorative compatible with the existing PET recycling stream.
packaging. These are popular
choices based on aesthetics. This guideline covers the most likely components
associated with post-consumer PET bottles. Using
Recyclability has not been a this guideline as a tool to aid the review of current
high priority for brands in the packaging and the development of new packaging,
past even though these choices packaging designers, sales and marketing staff can
can add significant cost and prevent the use of materials or combinations of
materials that might create problems in collecting,
reduce yield and line efficiency
sorting or recycling PET bottles.
for PET recycling streams.
The use of the guideline will also drive a change, as
more bottles get into highly recyclable categories, it
will improve the overall quality of recycled PET and
increase the quantity of high quality of rPET
available for reuse back into bottles. This change
will allow more widespread use of rPET and reduce
the amount of material that is currently being
downgraded due to impurities or poor colour.
26
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Summary of guidance
Designing for an improved Recycling-friendly features have minimal or no Conditional features present known technical challenges to the
recyclability Guidelines give negative effect on the productivity of the MRFs and recyclers’ yield, productivity or final product quality
operation or final product quality. Packages with but are tolerated by most MRFs and recyclers.
practical support and advice on these features are likely to pass through the
circular economy design recycling process into the most appropriate Problematic features pose significant adverse technical impact
principles. These guidelines material stream with the potential of producing on the MRFs and recyclers’ yield, productivity or final product
classify features that are high quality material. quality. The majority of MRFs and recyclers cannot remove these
features to the degree required to get a quality end product.
readily acceptable, tolerable
and problematic to MRFs and Table 11: PET bottle design guidance summary
recyclers.
Recycling-friendly Conditional Problematic for
recycling
Materials and aspects that are Materials and aspects that might pose a Materials and aspects that pose a
known to be acceptable in PET low risk of interfering with PET recycling high risk of interfering with PET
recycling and can be used. and should be avoided when possible. recycling and should not be used
Bottle size Diameter >50 mm and/or length Diameter 40 to 50 mm and/or Diameter <30 mm and/or
>100 mm, <400 mm length <100 mm length >400 mm
25
In the Indian market, there is a large proportion of PET bottles with green tint. This should not be a challenge if these are collected, sorted and recycled separately. Please note, green color is a challenge, but green tints are not.
27
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Liners, seals PE/EVA/PP foamed PE/PET liner Paper/silicone swimming valves Neck foils metal/PVC/silicone
and valves with density <1g/cm3 with density >1 g/cm3
Wraparound HDPE/medium density polyethylene Paper labels, metallic foils Pressure sensitive labels,
labels (MDPE)/LDPE/ LLDPE/PP/OPP label PVC/PS/paper/metallised labels
with density <1 g/cm3 with density >1 g/cm2
Labels Shrink sleeve Material density <1 g/cm3 with Materials with density <1 g/cm3 PVC/PS/PLA/PET-G, other
labels perforations and revealing >30% without perforations and material with density >1 g/cm3.
of bottle surface area revealing <30% of PET bottle Difficult to remove and/or NIR
sort with heavy ink coverage
Adhesives • Water soluble below 80°C Permanent adhesives with Water insoluble (even at elevated
• Minimal glue strip paper labels temperatures and pH levels)
• Comply with PRE guidelines
Direct printing Laser marked production Inkjet inks for direct printed • Any other direct printing
or expiry date inks production or expiry date • Inks that bleed, are toxic, are
hazardous or react with PET
Printing
inks
Printing on • Label inks are non-toxic - Label inks that bleed or peel off
labels • Follow EuPIA Guidelines from label surface
28
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
Figure 6: Sink-float water tank 16 Table 6: Caps and closure types commonly used in 17
Indian FMCG industry
Figure 7: Typical examples of two-piece, single-piece and 17
tethered caps Table 7: Design guidance for caps, closures, liners, 19
seals and valves
Figure 8: Typical examples of metal caps and closures 17
Table 8: Design guidance for labels 23
Figure 9: Typical closure liner 18
Table 9: Design guidance for use of adhesives 24
Figure 10: Flow control valve on bottle of honey 19
Table 10: Design guidance for use of printing inks 25
Figure 11: Aluminium foil seal 19
Table 11: Design guidance summary 27
Figure 12: Wraparound labels, PSA labels, sleeve systems 21
and direct printed bottles
29
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
About the India Plastics Pact About Confederation of Indian Industry About WWF India
The India Plastics Pact is a collaboration The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) WWF India is committed to creating and
between the Confederation of Indian Industry works to create and sustain an environment demonstrating practical solutions that help
(CII) and WWF India that unites businesses, conducive to the development of India, conserve India's ecosystems and rich
governments, NGOs and citizens to create a partnering Industry, Government, and civil biodiversity. With more than 50 years of
circular plastics economy in India. The CII-ITC society, through advisory and consultative conservation journey in the country, WWF
Centre of Excellence for Sustainable processes. For more than 125 years, CII has India works towards finding science-based
Development (CESD) anchors the India been engaged in shaping India’s development and sustainable solutions to address
Plastics Pact, within CII. The initiative is journey and works proactively on challenges at the interface of development
supported by WRAP, a global NGO based in transforming Indian Industry’s engagement in and conservation. WWF India is part of the
the UK. national development. CII engages closely WWF network, with offices in over 100
with Government on policy issues and countries across the world. WWF India works
Launched in September 2021, the India interfaces with thought leaders to enhance in many states of India, through our state and
Plastics Pact is the first Plastics Pact in Asia. efficiency, competitiveness and business field offices. The organisation works in
As of June 2022, there are 13 Plastics Pacts opportunities for Industry through a wide different geographical regions and across
spread across the globe. 33 organizations are portfolio of specialized services and strategic thematic areas, including the conservation of
currently part of the India Plastics Pact, global linkages. key wildlife species and their habitats,
including brand owners, recyclers, waste management of rivers, wetlands and their
management organisations, packaging India's premier business association has ecosystems. On the sustainability side, the
producers, resin producers and NGOs. The around 9,000 members, from the private as focus areas are climate change adaptation,
Pact works on all plastic resins at all stages well as public sectors, and an indirect driving sustainable solutions for business and
of the plastics value chain. membership of over 300,000 enterprises from agriculture and empowering local
around 286 national and regional sectoral communities as stewards of conservation.
industry bodies. With 62 offices, including 10 WWF India also works in combatting illegal
www.indiaplasticspact.org Centres of Excellence in India, and 8 overseas wildlife trade and in bringing environment
offices in Australia, Egypt, Germany, education to students through outreach and
Indonesia, Singapore, UAE, UK, and USA, as awareness campaigns.
well as institutional partnerships with 350
counterpart organizations in 133 countries, CII
serves as a reference point for Indian Industry
and the international business community.
30
Objective Guidance Conclusions Summary of guidance
WRAP is a climate action NGO working Launched in April 2018, UKRI is a UKRI India plays a key role in enhancing the
around the globe to tackle the causes of the non-departmental public body sponsored by research and innovation collaboration
climate crisis and give the planet a the Department for Business, Energy and between the UK and India. Since 2008, the UK
sustainable future. Our vision is a thriving Industrial Strategy (BEIS). and Indian governments, and third parties,
world in which climate change is no longer a have together invested over £330 million in
problem. We believe that our natural Our organisation brings together the seven co-funded research and innovation
resources should not be wasted and that disciplinary research councils, Research programmes.
everything we use should be re-used and England, which is responsible for supporting
recycled. We bring together and work with research and knowledge exchange at higher This investment has brought about more than
governments, businesses and individuals to education institutions in England, and the 258 individual projects. The projects were
ensure that the world’s natural resources are UK’s innovation agency, Innovate UK. funded by over 15 funding agencies, bringing
used more sustainably. Our core purpose is to together more than 220 lead institutions from
Our nine councils work together in innovative the UK and India. These research projects
help tackle climate change and protect our
ways to deliver an ambitious agenda, drawing have generated more than £450 million in
planet by changing the way things are
on our great depth and breadth of expertise further funding, mainly from public bodies
produced, consumed and disposed of. We
and the enormous diversity of our portfolio. but also from non-profit organisations and
support partner NGOs around the world to
deliver real change through collaboration and Through our councils we maintain and commercial entities, attesting the relevance
progress from over 300 of the world’s largest champion the creativity and vibrancy of of these projects.
businesses. Initiatives we support include: disciplines and sector-specific priorities and
Plastics Pacts in Chile, Kenya and India; food communities. Our councils shape and deliver
waste agreements in Mexico, South Africa both sectoral and domain-specific support.
and Indonesia; and food waste citizen
campaigns through our Love Food Hate Waste Whether through research council grants,
brand in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. quality related block grants from Research
England, or grants and wider support for
innovative businesses from Innovate UK, we
work with our stakeholders to understand the
opportunities and requirements of all the
different parts of the research and innovation
landscape, maintaining the health, breadth
and depth of the system.
31
Developed by
Supported by