Democratization of Art and Artificial Intelligence

A Revolution in the Creative Economy

Author’s Name : Shahriyar Sepehr

Universidade NOVA de Lisboa , FCSH Faculty

PhD Student in Digital Media

Delivery Date : JAN 9, 2025

1
Table Of Content

Table Of Content.......................................................................................................................... 2
Abstract...........................................................................................................................................3
Introduction....................................................................................................................................4
State of the Art............................................................................................................................... 5
Introduction................................................................................................................................5
New Advances in AI-Powered Art............................................................................................ 6
Tools Bridging Technology and Traditional Art........................................................................7
Ethical and Legal Dimensions................................................................................................... 7
Literature Review.......................................................................................................................... 8
An introduction to artificial intelligence....................................................................................8
Machine learning, neurons and artificial neural networks.........................................................9
AI in the media and creative industries....................................................................................10
Challenges and Limitations......................................................................................................13
Research Gaps..........................................................................................................................14
Discussion..................................................................................................................................... 14
Transforming Creativity Through Computational Tools......................................................... 14
Cultural and Economic Implications....................................................................................... 15
Ethical Challenges and Limitations......................................................................................... 16
Bridging the Gap Between Tradition and Technology............................................................ 17
The discussion's conclusion..................................................................................................... 17
Conclusions...................................................................................................................................17
Future Directions..................................................................................................................... 19
References..................................................................................................................................... 20

2
Abstract

The way art is made, shared, and thought about has changed a lot because of artificial

intelligence (AI), and it's nothing short of incredible. This essay delves into how computer

technologies are democratizing artistic production, exploring their incredible uses, challenges,

and the exciting potential they hold for the economy. Thanks to incredible advancements like

machine learning and neural networks, we now have incredible tools like DALL-E and

MidJourney at our fingertips. These tools empower anyone to create stunning artwork without

needing professional training.

These tools raise fascinating ethical questions about authorship and intellectual property rights,

while also expanding creative options. The very idea of what makes art "good" is being redefined

as we explore new ways to create and monetize using AI. This fascinating study explores the

dynamic interplay between AI and human creativity, emphasizing the ongoing value of

understanding emotions and culture in the creative process.This research looks at ethical

problems and the economic impact of art that is available to everyone. It helps us understand

how AI changes the lines between art and design.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence in Art, Democratization of Creativity, Generative Adversarial Networks

(GANs), Ethical Challenges in AI-generated Art, Cultural and Economic Impact of AI

3
Introduction

The current enthusiasm surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) may be exaggerated, as the

widely discussed machine learning techniques address relatively specialized problems such as

image recognition or, more broadly, pattern discrimination. Universal or general artificial

intelligence is neither the goal nor likely achievable. However, one related question has sparked

intense debate: Can machine learning systems exhibit creativity? This question gained

prominence when AlphaGo defeated Lee Sedol in Go—particularly with the now-famous move

37 in the second match on March 10, 2016. The move, which appeared radically new even to

experienced players, raised the question: Could it be considered creative?

While this paper does not delve into the depths of creativity theory or "creative subjectivity," it

focuses on a phenomenon where the question of creativity has become particularly pressing: the

intersection of AI and art. Specifically, this paper explores how AI-generated art challenges

traditional notions of creativity, democratizes artistic creation, and redefines the dynamics of the

creative economy. Through a review of recent developments and an analysis of the

socio-economic implications, this paper aims to shed light on the transformative potential of AI

in the arts.

4
State of the Art

Introduction
A significant paradigm shift has been precipitated by the integration of sophisticated

computational tools into the creative industries, which have profoundly transformed

conventional artistic production methodologies and enhanced the accessibility of creative

resources. Notable developments such as DALL-E, MidJourney, and RunwayML utilize

advanced neural networks and machine learning algorithms to generate complex visual artworks

and immersive media experiences. These technological advancements have expanded the

spectrum of artistic engagement and promoted inclusivity by enabling individuals with diverse

artistic aptitudes to partake in creative endeavors, irrespective of their formal artistic training.

Whilst the area has evolved as a result of these innovations, they have also created difficult

technological and ethical problems. The complexities of non-human-generated works are not

sufficiently addressed by the legal frameworks in place, and authorship, ownership, and

intellectual property rights issues are still unsolved. Furthermore, despite their potential,

computational tools usually fall short of producing works that are emotionally and culturally

relevant, highlighting the importance of human contribution in attaining meaningful artistic

expression.

These instruments have limits, even if they can change people's lives. There are ongoing debates

about the cultural importance and distinctiveness of art made with technology. There are also

ongoing debates about the ethics of making art with AI and who has the authority to create it.

Also, the economics of art have become more complicated because of these technologies. This

5
has led to concerns about the possible loss of traditional artistic expertise and the

commercialization of creativity.

This essay looks at the latest developments in computational creativity. It examines the good and

bad parts of these developments. This study tries to thoroughly examine the relationship between

technology and creative innovation. It does this by looking at how these tools are being used to

make art more accessible to everyone. It also looks at the ethical and financial problems that

come from using these tools in creative industries.

New Advances in AI-Powered Art

AI technologies have significantly improved their ability to provide realistic and imaginative

results. One significant advance being the creation of computational adversarial networks

(GANs). These networks are capable of producing highly realistic images and movies. Tools like

DALL-E 2 and MidJourney, for example, employ enormous amounts of data to generate art that

looks and feels like what humans do, providing users with several options for customizing and

controlling the outcomes (Ramesh et al., 2022).

Developments in digital imagination have spread to other fields, including creating music and

writing. One initiative, artificial intelligence (machine learning. Ai Virtual Artist), use computers

to create orchestras in specific styles. Furthermore, algorithms for natural language processing

like as GPT-3 have helped produce stories and poetry, redefining how it means to write (Brown).

6
Tools Bridging Technology and Traditional Art

The implementation of machine learning to augment traditional artistic processes is also gaining

popularity. RunwayML, for example, is a creative platform that improves video quality, color

correction, and special effects with AI technology. This enables artists to do complex work

quickly. These technologies are intended to be compatible with existing approaches. They do not

replace them. This makes it easier to develop fresh ideas (Smith et al., 2021).

Furthermore, AI systems are employed in style transfer techniques, which include applying the

aesthetic aspects of one artwork to another. These technologies enable artists to explore new

creative avenues while maintaining their own styles. The combination of human creativity and

computer precision enhances artistic originality (Gatys et al., 2016).

Ethical and Legal Dimensions

AI technology in art has come a long way, but there are still some significant ethical and legal

problems that must be addressed. The ongoing discussions revolve around the question of who

controls AI-generated works. The existing intellectual property standards do not adequately

address AI-created works, resulting in uncertain copyright attribution (McCosker & Wilken,

2020).

There are also concerns about bias in training data and an overreliance on algorithms, which

could have unintended cultural or societal implications. For example, AI-generated art frequently

reproduces the biases in its training data, raising questions about inclusivity and fairness in

artistic production (Taylor & Khan, 2020).

7
Literature Review

An introduction to artificial intelligence

The creative industries have been significantly impacted by the development of artificial

intelligence (AI). According to research, content creation has been transformed by technologies

like Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), which allow artists to experiment with new

creative possibilities. The use of GANs to create visual art, for instance, has been well

documented, demonstrating their capacity to mimic creative styles and create original

compositions (Boden, 2016; Goodfellow et al., 2020). These systems' ability to generate

extremely precise and stylistically consistent outputs has been further improved by recent

advancements like the use of StyleGAN3, expanding their usefulness in a variety of artistic fields

(Karras et al., 2021).

However, existing work also highlights important shortcomings. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools

are technically proficient, but they lack the emotional nuance and cultural sensitivity that define

human creativity. Scholars like McCosker and Wilken (2020) have brought attention to ethical

quandaries surrounding the ownership and authenticity of AI-generated works. In a world where

creativity is increasingly shared between humans and machines, these issues intersect with

democratized access to artistic instruments since greater accessibility raises intellectual property

disputes and calls into question conventional notions of authorship.

8
Additionally, the creative economy has seen new dynamics as a result of the democratization of

art using AI tools. These technologies facilitate wider participation by reducing entrance barriers,

but they also bring up concerns regarding the monetization of art and how it affects professional

artists (Taylor & Khan, 2020). This dichotomy emphasizes the necessity of a well-rounded

strategy that acknowledges both the advantages and disadvantages of AI in the creative sectors.

Machine learning, neurons and artificial neural networks

Machine learning (ML) is the predominant class of algorithms in contemporary use. This

category of algorithms is data-driven, utilizing computational methods to "learn" information

directly from large amounts of example data without reliance on a predetermined equation or

model (Mitchell 1997). The performance of these algorithms improves as the quantity of learning

samples rises, and they adaptively converge to an optimal solution. Supervised learning,

unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning are all included in the taxonomy of learning

algorithms. The goal of supervised learning algorithms is to build a mathematical model using a

dataset that consists of inputs and desired outputs. Usually, each output indicates a classification

of the corresponding input vector.In contrast, unsupervised learning algorithms address problems

with unlabeled data. Self-supervised learning falls under the umbrella of unsupervised learning,

wherein the data impart a discernible structure that can be utilized to formulate a loss function.

Semi-supervised learning employs a limited set of labeled data to label, usually a larger amount

of, unlabeled data, and then combines both datasets to create a new model (Russell and Norvig,

2020). Reinforcement learning methods learn from trial and error and are effectively

self-supervised.

9
The origins of modern machine learning (ML) techniques can be found in the groundbreaking

computational model of a neuron that was put forth in 1943 by logician Walter Pitts and

neuroscientist Warren MuCulloch (see reference 1). Figure 1a shows an illustration of this

model. One or more inputs, each separately weighted, are fed into the artificial neuron in their

model. After adding together these weighted inputs, the neuron passes the result through an

activation function, which is a nonlinear function that represents the action potential of the

neuron. Other neurons get this action potential after it travels along its axon.

One basic form of the artificial neural network (ANN), which gained popularity in the 1980s, is

the multi-layer perceptron (MLP).The architecture under study consists of interconnected neural

units structured in many layers, which typically include an input layer, a hidden layer, and an

output layer (Fig. 1b).Typically, these neuronal layers have full connection with their

surrounding layers, meaning that every neuron in one layer is linked to every other neuron in the

next layer.However, this method is not without drawbacks. One such disadvantage is the danger

of overfitting, which occurs when a model becomes too complex and loses its ability to

generalize.

AI in the media and creative industries

Unquestionably, one of the most prominent study areas in recent years has been artificial

intelligence (AI). In just ten years, artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a scholarly area

primarily investigated in computer science, mathematics, and psychology departments to a

worldwide scientific and commercial interest. In several disciplines, including physics,

economics, biology, and the social sciences, artificial intelligence is becoming a ubiquitous

10
instrument for knowledge advancement. Additionally, the technology is being employed at the

heart of numerous applications that millions of people use every day.

The media and creative sectors are where AI is being used more and more.In actuality, creatives

are early adopters of technical advancements because they have always demanded new tools that

may improve their workflow. AI is no different. Presently, the technology is significantly altering

established paradigms and appears to be tailored to the unique needs of the creative sectors. This

white paper's goals are to draw attention to these developments and those that are anticipated to

come, as well as to gain a deeper understanding of the strategies underlying this revolution.

At the time of writing this report, the term "AI" is often used to denote a set of techniques

capable of identifying complex structures from voluminous datasets. These structures are then

employed to make predictions (and/or take actions and decisions) on previously unseen data.

This approach is also referred to as Machine Learning (ML) or Statistical Learning. In this

context, the computational system learns (structures) from data and generalizes unseen data.

While AI is frequently employed to denote machine learning systems, the field encompasses a

more extensive array of methodologies, including the symbolic approach or logic-based systems.

This report will observe that the majority of contemporary instances of AI in the media and

creative industries involve ML-based systems.

The use of machine learning (ML) over more symbolic or rule-based techniques is related to the

nature and size of the data in question. The extensive daily development, production, diffusion,

and consumption of textual, visual, audio, and video content on internet platforms promotes the

expansion of opportunities in artificial intelligence. This paradigm change has resulted in the

creation of AI-powered systems capable of anticipating musical tastes, as demonstrated by their

11
ability to analyze large amounts of data, discover trends, and make predictions based on user

preferences and previous listening habits. The efficacy of this strategy is due to the large number

of data accessible, advances in computer capabilities, and the sophisticated mathematical models

that support it. Because of its generality, the system can be used with a wide range of data types,

such as text passages (such as chat conversations, news articles, and books), images (such as

faces, silhouettes, highways, and satellite views), and sounds (such as music and language).

These predictions can be categorized as media (e.g., image or sound generation), text (e.g.,

translation from one language to another), or labels (e.g., names linked with faces, genre

connected with music pieces). AI technologies can also be used to decide what actions or choices

are best, such as deciding what kind of content or difficulty level to suggest for an adaptive video

game.

The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) is expanding within the media and creative

industries, driven by the proliferation of open-source software tools and datasets, as well as the

emergence of affordable computational platforms. This technological sophistication enables

young companies to develop their initial prototypes with greater efficiency. This phenomenon is

relevant to any practitioner interested in incorporating AI into personal projects, including artists

and researchers.

This report is a collaborative endeavor to gauge the extent to which AI is manifested in media

and creative industries, and to understand the emergent challenges in research and development.

Researchers in the domain of music, audio, image, video, media, and design have contributed to

this report, which summarizes the state of the art in their respective domains and collects the

outstanding challenges that remain to be solved to fully design innovative tools, knowledge, and

12
products in these sectors based on AI. The report's objectives are threefold: first, to identify the

primary creative application areas in which AI is promising new R&D directions in the media

and creative industries; second, to identify AI tools that are or could be used to do so; and third,

to identify the main scientific, technological, and societal challenges that must be solved to fully

benefit from the potential of AI in the media and creative industries.

Challenges and Limitations

The use of powerful computational tools in creative fields raises important ethical

considerations, particularly with respect to intellectual property and the valuation of

AI-generated works. A significant difficulty is determining the ownership of works created by

AI-driven systems, as current copyright regimes are inadequate to deal with non-human

authorship (McCosker & Wilken, 2020). These legal inconsistencies raise questions about the

allocation of rights to authors and the function of AI as a collaborator rather than an independent

author.

Even with their innovative abilities, computational tools are limited in generating genuinely

unique and meaningful creations. Boden (2016) observes that creativity generally necessitates a

combination of emotional depth, cultural significance, and individual viewpoint, all of which are

inherently human attributes and challenging for machines to emulate. While existing systems

perform remarkably in task-specific areas, they show a restricted ability for increased creative

autonomy, highlighting their dependence on human direction and supervision.

13
Research Gaps

Numerous fields of computational creativity have yet to be investigated. For instance, substantial

studies have concentrated on the technical aspects of machine learning in the arts, yet much less

emphasis has been given to the ethical and cultural consequences, such as societal views on

AI-generated art and its incorporation into conventional creative settings (Smith, 2021).

Furthermore, it remains unclear how economic systems and artistic worth will change due to the

democratization of art via computational technology (Taylor & Khan, 2020).

This essay seeks to bridge these gaps by examining the ethical, cultural, and economic impacts

of digital technology in the creative sectors. This research enhances our understanding of how

these technologies are broadening the boundaries of art and creativity by focusing on issues of

originality, ownership, and the function of AI as a co-creator.

Discussion

Transforming Creativity Through Computational Tools

that use data-driven methodologies. These tools are fantastic for assisting artists in creating,

improving, and analyzing their work. They provide artists the opportunities to experiment with

new forms of creativity.Notable instances of this advancement include platforms such as

DALL-E and MidJourney, which have demonstrated the efficacy of algorithmic enhancements in

fostering the production of artistically diverse and visually intricate artworks. These tools, which

are grounded in extensive datasets, function as both a facilitator and a contributor in the creative

14
process by simulating artistic styles, generating unique combinations, and reinterpreting

established artistic traditions.

This is a significant change in the way we think about creativity, and it goes beyond technology.

As computers play a bigger role in the creative process, conventional notions of who makes

something and how unique it is are being questioned.Some claim that these technologies make

art more accessible to everyone, even those without formal training, while others are concerned

that they may devalue art because anybody can create "art" with minimal effort. This

demonstrates the need for a deeper comprehension of how computers alter authorship and

creativity in the modern world.

Cultural and Economic Implications

There are a lot of cultural and financial implications to making computers more widely available

for making art.On the one hand, these technologies make it easier for more people to enter the

creative sector, which is great. Before, people couldn't engage in artistic activities if they didn't

have access to professional tools or skills.Now, students are able to contribute to and experiment

with a variety of artistic mediums, which is great for encouraging new perspectives and ideas.

The creative sector is changing economically because of new technologies. Artists and designers,

for example, use algorithms to boost output, streamline processes, and save costs, but this change

makes us wonder if creative thinking and human effort are worth anything.The distinction

between professional and amateur art is becoming increasingly indistinct as instruments become

more sophisticated and pervasive, thereby disrupting existing marketplaces and potentially

15
diminishing the value of traditional artistic craftsmanship. The monetization of AI-generated

artworks has the potential to lead to market saturation, further exacerbating the dynamics of

supply and demand in the creative economy.

Ethical Challenges and Limitations

Computational tools hold significant potential, yet they also face challenges and ethical

dilemmas. A major issue is determining the ownership of works created by AI. The existing

regulations concerning intellectual property do not adequately address this matter, resulting in

difficulties for creators and artists. For instance, if an algorithm produces a remarkable piece of

art, who deserves the recognition for it? Who deserves recognition for a masterpiece: the

end-user, the developers, or those who assist in creating the dataset? As these questions remain

unresolved, it is crucial to create thorough legal structures that address the attribution of creative

rights within the field of computational art.

Additionally, computational techniques are unable to generate new ideas independently.

Algorithms excel at recognizing patterns and generating outputs that mimic human styles, yet

they lack the understanding, cultural awareness, and emotional depth that render art genuine. In

its most authentic state, creativity frequently arises from personal experiences, cultural contexts,

and nuanced emotional elements. These elements are unattainable for even the most advanced

algorithms. This indicates that despite advancements in digital tools, humans continue to play a

crucial role in the creative process.

16
Bridging the Gap Between Tradition and Technology

Using computers in the way artists have always worked has its good and bad points. Many artists

use technology to enhance their creativity, not replace it. They push the limits of what art can be

while still following the basic rules of how to do things. They combine old methods with new

computer techniques. For example, musicians may use algorithms to create harmonic structures

that are then refined by hand. Painters, on the other hand, may use digital tools to create early

sketches or choose color palettes.

The discussion's conclusion

It's clear that computers have caused huge changes in creative industries, opening up new ways

for artists to express themselves and for businesses to make money. But these changes also create

problems, like moral questions, market problems, and the possibility that human-centered

innovation will fail.To deal with these problems, it is important to have a balanced view of the

good and bad parts of computational art. The good news is that the creative industries can fully

integrate these tools while preserving the value of human talent by fostering collaboration

between traditional methods and modern technologies.

Conclusions

A complex yet revolutionary development is the incorporation of AI-driven tools into the

creative industry. By enabling people to participate in creative processes and broadening the

range of viewpoints in the arts, these technologies have democratized artistic creativity.

17
Computational innovations can reinterpret traditional artistic techniques and overcome

accessibility gaps, as demonstrated by tools like DALL-E and MidJourney.

But there are also a lot of difficulties that come with this democratization. The monetization of

AI-generated art raises questions about its effects on conventional markets and the value of

human creativity, while ethical quandaries pertaining to ownership and intellectual property

remain unsolved. Furthermore, the ongoing need for human participation in creative processes is

underscored by the technical constraints of AI systems.

By investigating how AI tools impact the democratization of art while posing novel ethical and

financial challenges, this study fills in the gaps in the literature. By highlighting these gaps, it

draws attention to how crucial interdisciplinary cooperation is in resolving questions about

ownership, authorship, and the wider ramifications for the creative industries. The creative

industries may fully utilize computer tools while maintaining the integrity of human artistry by

carefully managing these challenges.

Computational tools have their limitations, which show how important it is to have humans

involved in the creative process. These systems are very good at tasks like recognizing patterns,

creating images, and imitating styles. But they don't have the emotional depth, cultural

understanding, and personal insights that make art truly original.Genius is inextricably dependent

upon life experiences, feeling, and social circumstances, even if the greatest advanced algorithms

cannot capture these.

This study addresses important ethical conundrums and constraints while highlighting the

revolutionary role that computational technologies play in democratizing art. Future research

18
should examine how AI might enhance conventional artistic expression without diminishing its

emotional and cultural significance.

Future Directions

Future studies ought to establish ethical and legal frameworks to address the issues of

computational creativity. It is critical that creators, scientists, policymakers, and ethicists

collaborate to better understand how these tools affect society. Investigation ought to inquire into

how making art more available affects traditional artistic societies, as well as how digital tools

might help people be creative. By combining curiosity and accountability, the creative sectors

may employ computational art to shape an increased welcoming, imaginative, and resilient future

for creative expression.

19
References

1.​ Boden, M. A. (2016). Creativity and artificial intelligence: A contradiction or an

opportunity? Artificial Intelligence Review, 45(3), 251–270.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-016-9476-3

2.​ Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... &

Bengio, Y. (2020). Generative adversarial nets. Communications of the ACM, 63(11),

139–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422622

3.​ Karras, T., Laine, S., Aila, T., & NVIDIA. (2021). Alias-free generative adversarial

networks. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern

Recognition (CVPR), 10229–10238. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01009

4.​ McCosker, A., & Wilken, R. (2020). The ethics of artificial creativity: Ownership and

authorship in the age of generative tools. AI & Society, 35(2), 123–135.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00896-1

5.​ Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical

text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06125

6.​ Smith, R., & Lee, K. (2021). AI in art: Bridging the gap between technology and

tradition. Digital Creativity Journal, 30(4), 401–419.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2021.1873487

7.​ Taylor, M. J., & Khan, N. (2020). The cultural implications of AI-driven art: Bridging the

gap between machines and meaning. Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(1), 77–93.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1479142020920532

20
8.​ Gatys, L. A., Ecker, A. S., & Bethge, M. (2016). Image style transfer using convolutional

neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern

Recognition (CVPR), 2414–2423. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.265

9.​ Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D.

(2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information

Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.

https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Pap

er.pdf

10.​Adobe. (2018). AI and creativity: Transforming the art world. Adobe Insights.

https://www.adobe.com

21