Arch Sex Behav DOI 10.

1007/s10508-009-9535-1

ORIGINAL PAPER

The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Female Sexual Arousal Disorder

American Psychiatric Association 2009

Abstract This article reviews and critiques the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (FSAD). An overview of how the diagnostic criteria for FSAD have evolved over previous editions of the DSM is presented and research on prevalence and etiology of FSAD is briey reviewed. Problems with the essential feature of the DSM-IV-TR diagnosisan inability to attain, or to maintainan adequate lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitementare identied. The signicant overlap between arousal and desire disorders is highlighted. Finally, specic recommendations for revision of the criteria for DSM-V are made, including use of a polythetic approach to the diagnosis and the addition of duration and severity criteria. Keywords Sexual arousal disorder DSM-V Sexual problems Women

Introduction diagnostic categories are simply concepts, justied only by whether they provide a useful framework for organizing and explaining the complexity of clinical experience in order to derive inferences about outcome and to guide decisions about treatment. (Kendell & Jablensky, 2003, p. 5) The third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) (American Psychiatric Association, 1980) was the rst to include the category of Psychosexual Disorders, dened as inhibitions in sexual desire or the psychoC. A. Graham (&) Oxford Doctoral Course in Clinical Psychology, Isis Education Centre, Warneford Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK e-mail: [email protected]

physiological changes that characterize the sexual response cycle (p. 261). Utilizing the human sexual response cycle (HRSC) model developed by Masters and Johnson (1966) as the framework, inhibition could occur at any one or more of the following phases: appetitive, excitement, orgasm, and resolution. The most recent edition of DSM (DSM-IV-TR) (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) preserved this basic structure, classifying sexual dysfunctions into the following categories: Sexual Desire Disorders, Sexual Arousal Disorders, Orgasmic Disorders, Sexual Pain Disorders, Sexual Dysfunction due to a General Medical Condition, Substance-Induced Sexual Dysfunction, and Sexual Dysfunction Not Otherwise Specied. The purpose of this article is to review and critique the DSM diagnostic criteria for Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (FSAD). An overview of how the diagnostic criteria for FSAD have evolved over the last three editions of the DSM will rst be presented. Following this, research on the prevalence and etiology of FSAD will be reviewed, and the relationship between arousal problems and distress discussed. Previous critiques of DSM and revised denitions that have been put forward will be reviewed. The specic diagnostic criteria for FSAD will be critically examined and key issues that should be considered for DSM-V identied. Finally, recommendations will be made for revision of the criteria.

Review of the Diagnostic Criteria for FSAD (DSM-III, DSM-III-R, and DSM-IV) The DSM-III diagnostic criteria for Inhibited Sexual Excitement are presented in Table 1. Note that, unlike subsequent editions of DSM, the same diagnostic label was used for men and women. This reected the assumption at the time that male and female sexual response were similar and that vaginal lubrication was the counterpart to male penile erection. Although the

123

Arch Sex Behav Table 1 DSM-III diagnostic criteria for Inhibited Sexual Excitement (302.72) A. Recurrent and persistent inhibition of sexual excitement during sexual activity, manifested by In Males, partial or complete failure to attain or maintain erection until completion of the sexual act, or In Females, partial or complete failure to attain or maintain the lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement until completion of the sexual act B. A clinical judgment that the individual engages in sexual activity that is adequate in focus, intensity, and duration C. The disturbance is not caused exclusively by organic factors (e.g., physical disorder or medication) and is not due to another Axis 1 disorder Table 3 DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (302.72) A. Persistent or recurrent inability to attain, or to maintain until completion of the sexual activity, an adequate lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement B. The disturbance causes marked distress or interpersonal difculty C. The sexual dysfunction is not better accounted for by another Axis I disorder (except another Sexual Dysfunction) and is not due exclusively to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical condition Specify type Lifelong type Acquired type Specify type Generalized type Situational type

DSM-III text described the excitement phase as consisting of a subjective sense of sexual pleasure and accompanying physiological changes (p. 276), the diagnostic criteria themselves only required impairment in genital arousal (penile erection in the male and lubrication/swelling in the female). In DSM-III-R (American Psychiatric Association, 1987), the Sexual Arousal Disorders were subdivided into Male Erectile Disorder (302.72) and Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (302.72). There was one important change in the diagnostic criteria for both sexes: Criterion A now required either impaired genital response (lubrication/swelling in the case of women, erection for men) or persistent or recurrent lack of a subjective sense of sexual excitement and pleasureduring sexual activity (see Table 2). The DSM-III-R text noted that, In most instances there will be a disturbance in both the subjective sense of pleasure or desire and objective performance (p. 261). In DSM-IV and DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 1994, 2000), lack of subjective excitement and pleasure was dropped from Criterion A for both male and female arousal disorders. Thus, in women, the diagnosis of FSAD could be made solely on the basis of impairment of an adequate lubrication-swelling response (see Table 3). In contrast with earlier DSM-III and III-R texts (which referred to subjective pleasure and non-genital physiologic changes such as breast tumes-

Specify Due to psychological factors Due to combined factors

Table 2 DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (302.72) A. Either (1) or (2) (1) Persistent or recurrent partial or complete failure to attain or maintain the lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement until completion of the sexual activity (2) Persistent or recurrent lack of a subjective sense of sexual excitement and pleasure in a female during sexual activity B. Occurrence not exclusively during the course of another Axis I disorder (other than a Sexual Dysfunction), such as Major Depression

cence), the emphasis in the DSM-IV text also shifted to genital changes associated with sexual arousal. For example, the major changes associated with sexual excitement were described as: vasocongestion in the pelvis, vaginal lubrication and expansion, and swelling of the external genitalia (p. 494). The one mention of subjective response in the text on FSAD reects the lesser importance ascribed to subjective pleasure and excitement compared to genital arousal: The individual with Female Sexual Arousal Disorder may have little or no subjective sense of sexual arousal (p. 501) (my emphasis). The Work Group recommended that rather than retain the concept of subjective excitement and pleasure in the diagnostic criteria, diminished subjective sexual feelings be listed as an example of a Sexual Dysfunction Not Otherwise Specied (SDNOS) (302.70). It is interesting to consider the rationale for this increased focus on genital indicators of arousal and the removal of subjective feelings of sexual excitement and pleasure from the DSM-IV criteria. The DSM-III-R criteria were considered problematic for two reasons: (1) the vagueness of the criteria and the extent to which clinician judgement was required to make a diagnosis and (2) the combination of both subjective and physiological symptom criteria, particularly when studies had found poor concordance between subjective measures of arousal and genital measures, such as vaginal pulse amplitude (VPA), in women (Segraves, 1996a). Examination of the DSM-IV Sourcebook (Segraves, 1996a) reveals that, in the lead-up to DSM-IV, three options were considered: (1) deletion of the FSAD diagnosis (on the grounds that there was little evidence either of the clinical utility of the diagnosis or that FSAD existed as a discrete syndrome); (2) retention of the FSAD diagnosis and the DSM-III-R criteria; (3) modication of the criteria so that Criterion A include

123

Arch Sex Behav

only impaired vaginal lubrication and not subjective response. Interestingly, although a literature review carried out supported deletion of the FSAD category (Option 1), the Work Group recommended Option 3 on the grounds that this would maintain compatibility between the sexes and between the DSM-IV and ICD-10 (Segraves, 1996a, p. 1006). The Work Group recommendations pertaining to Male Erectile Disorder (ED) also called for the diagnostic criteria to be modied so that only erectile failure (and not reduced subjective excitement) was required. The justication here was that in research studies the diagnosis of ED was based on objective criteria alone and that, clinically, there is no evidence that men exist who have decreased sexual arousal in the absence of desire or orgasm dysfunction (Segraves, 1996b, p. 1110). The International Statistical Classication of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) (World Health Organization, 1992) does have a diagnostic category of Failure of Genital Response (F52.2), but there is also a separate category labelled Sexual Aversion and Lack of Sexual Enjoyment (F52.1). Thus, although the Work Group sought full compatibility with ICD10 (Segraves, 1996a), this was not, in fact, what was achieved by removing subjective excitement and pleasure from the FSAD criteria. Another major change in DSM-IV was the inclusion of Criterion B (i.e., the requirement that the problem causes marked distress or interpersonal difculty); this criterion was added to the criteria sets for all the sexual dysfunctions in DSM-IV. The relationship between distress and symptoms of FSAD will be discussed below. Criterion C of DSM-IV criteria for FSAD restricted the diagnosis to those cases where the sexual dysfunction is not better accounted for by another Axis I disorder (except another Sexual Dysfunction) and is not due exclusively to the direct physiological effects of a substanceor a general medical condition. In DSM-III-R (American Psychiatric Association, 1987), subtyping (lifelong or acquired; generalized or situational; psychogenic only or psychogenic and biogenic) had been added. Although these subtypes were retained in DSM-IV-TR, psychogenic only was renamed due to psychological factors and psychogenic and biogenic changed to due to combined factors. Although more precise duration and severity criteria were considered by the DSM-IV Work Group for some of the sexual dysfunctions (e.g., ED) (Segraves, 1996b), the lack of empirical data on the relationship between severity and duration criteria and treatment outcome ruled this out. For FSAD, however, the DSM-IV text included this statement: Occasional problems with sexual arousal that are not persistent or recurrentare not considered to be Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (p. 501). Similarly, a diagnosis of FSAD should not be given if the problems in arousal are due to sexual stimulation that is not adequate in focus, intensity, and duration (p. 501).

Background Concept of Sexual Arousal and Underlying Mechanisms The term sexual arousal has been used in a variety of ways (Bancroft, 2005; Singer, 1984). Although some authors discuss sexual arousal as if it is synonymous with genital arousal, the concept is much broader than this. It has been dened as a state motivated towards the experience of sexual pleasure and possibly orgasm, and involving (i) information processing of relevant stimuli, (ii) arousal in a general sense, (iii) incentive motivation, and (iv) genital response (Bancroft, 2005, p. 411). A distinction can be made between the state of sexual arousal and sexual arousability, with the latter referring to an individuals disposition to respond to sexual cues with sexual arousal, which varies across and within individuals (Bancroft, 2005; Laan & Both, 2008). The Masters and Johnson HSRC model and Kaplans (1974) model of human sexual response characterized sexual response as a universal, essentially linear progression from sexual desire, through the stages of arousal, orgasm, and resolution. These stages were conceptualized as discrete phases, with the possibility of specic impairments at any one or more of the phases; as discussed above, the DSM-IV classication system is based on this model. The HRSC model has received much criticism, particularly regarding its applicability to women (e.g., Boyle, 1994; Hartmann, Heiser, Ruffer-Hesse, & Kloth, 2002; Levin, 2008; Tiefer, 1991). Focusing on incentive motivation, the model put forward by Laan and Janssen (2007) denes sexual motivation as the result of the activation of a sensitive sexual response system by sexually competent stimuli that are present in the environment (p. 329; see also Laan & Everaerd, 1995). Both sexual arousal and sexual desire are viewed as responses to a sexually relevant stimulus. Sexual desire may reect early arousal processes (Everaerd, Laan, Both, & van der Velde, 2000) and it is argued that there is no such thing as spontaneous sexual desire (Laan & Both, 2008). Sexual thoughts or sexual activity act as stimuli, which then trigger the desire-arousal process. Individuals have variable tendencies to respond to sexual stimuli (often referred to as arousability) (Laan & Both, 2008). While the drive model assumes that we have sex because we feel desire (Laan & Janssen, 2007), the incentive motivation model instead suggests that we feel sexual desire because we have sex or think about sex (Laan & Both, 2008). In other words, sexual thoughts or sexual activity act as stimuli, which then trigger the desire/arousal process. Everaerd et al. (2000) suggested that, in comparison with men, genital changes might inuence subjective experience of sexual arousal in women to a lesser extent than external, contextual cues. There is now a considerable body of evidence that supports this model (Both, Everaerd, & Laan, 2003; Laan & Everaerd, 1995; Laan & Janssen, 2007; for review, see Toates, 2009).

123

Arch Sex Behav

Another model of female sexual response, similar in some ways to the incentive motivation model, was put forward by Basson (2000), who suggested that women most frequently engage in sexual activity not because of any intrinsic sexual desire, but from a state of sexual neutrality and primarily motivated by non-sexual reasons, such as desire for emotional closeness with a partner. According to this model, a combination of incentives for sexual activity, appropriate sexual stimuli for the woman, and a context conducive to facilitating her arousal (e.g., privacy, lack of distractions, etc.) would encourage the experience of sexual arousal. If this sexual arousal was positive for the woman, this then triggered a desire for her to continue the sexual encounter, now for both non-sexual and sexual reasons. This emergent desire (which followed arousal) was termed responsive sexual desire. Basson (2000) also argued that sexual arousal in women is more a mental excitement, very much about the appreciation of the sexual stimulus and less about the awareness of genital changes (p. 63). A study by Sand and Fisher (2007) challenged the idea that there is one underlying model of sexual response that is uniform across women. A group of 111 nurses were asked which of three different models of sexual responseMasters and Johnsons (1966), Kaplans (1974), and Bassons (2000) best represented their own experience. Approximately equal proportions of women endorsed each of these three models and, interestingly, those women who endorsed the Basson model had lower scores on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (Rosen et al., 2000) (indicating worse sexual functioning) than women endorsing one of the other two models. With regard to the endocrinology of sexual arousal, despite considerable research, our understanding of the relevance of hormones in womens sexual arousal is still limited. There is minimal evidence of a direct effect of estradiol on sexual arousability in women (Dennerstein, Burrows, Wood, & Hyman, 1980; Sherwin, 1991). Although there has been much interest in the role of testosterone in female sexuality, the evidence is inconsistent, compared to the male data, and there appears to be considerable variability in womens response to androgens (Graham, Bancroft, Greco, Tanner, & Doll, 2007). The role of peptides, such as oxytocin and prolactin, is also uncertain (Bancroft, 2005). Assessment of Genital Response Assessment of genital response in women is considered difcult in comparison with that of men (Bartlik & Goldberg, 2000). Levin (2003) pointed out that the relationship between vaginal lubrication and sexual arousal is uncertain. Although lubrication does usually increase during sexual arousal, it may not be maintained, especially after a lengthy period of stimulation. It is also worth noting that although the essential criterion for a DSM diagnosis of FSAD is an inadequate

lubrication-swelling response, the focus in almost all of the research has been on the lubrication aspect, and not on genital swelling, which presents considerable challenges in terms of measurement. Moreover, regarding lubrication difculties, clinical and epidemiological research has relied almost exclusively on womens subjective reports of lubrication, i.e., not on any objective measurement of lubrication. Rather than measuring vaginal lubrication or swelling, studies dating back to the 1970s investigating genital response in women have mainly assessed pulse amplitude in the vaginal wall (VPA), using vaginal photoplethysmography (Laan & Everaerd, 1995; Sintchak & Geer, 1975). There is now a large literature on VPA, although the methodology has a number of limitations (Levin, 2007). Increases in VPA occur quickly, often within a few seconds, in laboratory studies where women are presented with erotic stimuli (Laan & Everaerd, 1995), suggesting an automatic response (Laan & Both, 2008). A consistent observation has been that when subjective reports of arousal are correlated with VPA, the correlations are low in wom` en (Chivers, Seto, Lalumiere, Laan, & Grimbos, in press). In contrast, in men, the degree of penile erection correlates highly with subjective ratings of arousal and is usually always signicant. In women, the most consistent pattern found in laboratory studies is that VPA occurs in response to sexual stimuli, but subjective sexual arousal is low or non-existent (Everaerd et al., 2000). As Everaerd et al. (2000) observed, hardly ever was desynchrony between genital and subjective sexual arousal found to be the result of subjective sexual arousal without genital responding (p. 122). There has been an implicit assumption in the literature that VPA is a measure of sexual arousal (Bancroft, 2009). However, there is uncertainty about the relationship of increased vaginal blood ow to sexual arousal in women (Levin, 2003). Although it is well established that VPA increases when women are exposed to sexual stimuli, as noted above, this response appears to be fairly automatic (and may occur even when the stimuli are negatively evaluated by women) (Laan & Everaerd, 1995). More broadly speaking, it has been observed that, in comparison with men, genital arousal appears to be a less important factor in womens subjective sexual arousal (Laan & Everaerd, 1995). There have been various explanations put forth for the reasons for this gender difference, including social learning theories and biological explanations (e.g., anatomical differences between men and women) (Everaerd et al., 2000). It is possible that other aspects of genital response (e.g., clitoral blood ow) may be better indices of sexual arousal. There are other methods, such as labial thermistors, clitoral ultrasonography, and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (for review, see Janssen, 2001) but to date none of these have gained widespread acceptance or been widely used. One major criticism has been the invasive methodology required for their placement on the genitals by the investigator. In two recent studies (Kukkonen, Binik, Amsel, & Carrier, 2007, 2009), genital

123

Arch Sex Behav

temperature (assessed using thermal imaging) was signicantly correlated with subjective ratings of sexual arousal in women. However, there are practical difculties (e.g., cost, intrusiveness) with this measure. In addition, it has never been used to compare genital arousal responses between women with and without FSAD, so its diagnostic utility is unknown. In recent years, researchers have begun to utilize magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to study the anatomy of the female genital and pelvic organs during sexual arousal (Maravilla & Yang, 2008; Suh et al., 2004). Although this research is at an early stage, ndings suggest greater variability of response in women with FSAD, with some women showing virtually no response to sexual stimuli, and others showing responses that are indistinguishable from women without sexual difculties (Maravilla & Yang, 2008). Prevalence of FSAD In an early review of the epidemiology of DSM-III psychosexual dysfunctions, the prevalence of Inhibited Sexual Excitement was said to be indeterminate for women because so few studies had included questions about female genital response (Nathan, 1986). Since the publication of DSM-IV, there have been several large-scale epidemiological surveys that have reported prevalence rates for lubrication problems in women, many of which have used nationally representative and cross-cultural samples. A criticism of earlier studies that claimed to have used DSM criteria to establish sexual dysfunction was that they did not evaluate the presence of marked distress or interpersonal difculty (Simons & Carey, 2001). More recent studies have assessed the presence of associated distress or impairment (Bancroft, Loftus, & Long, 2003; Oberg, Fugl-Meyer, & Fugl-Meyer, 2004; Shifren, Monz, Russo, Segreti, & Johannes, 2008; Witting et al., 2008). Notwithstanding these methodological improvements over earlier studies, some of the criteria required to make DSM diagnoses are difcult, if not impossible, to assess in large, population-based surveys (Graham & Bancroft, 2006). For example, while not part of the diagnostic criteria, the DSM text states that a diagnosis of FSAD isnot appropriate if the problems in arousal are due to sexual stimulation that is not adequate in focus, intensity, and duration (p. 501). One of the few studies that assessed complaints, such as too little foreplay before intercourse, was an early investigation by Frank, Anderson, and Rubinstein (1978). A total of 100 married couples completed a self-report questionnaire that assessed the presence or absence of sexual problems, such as difculty getting excited and difculty maintaining excitement. Almost half (48%) of the women reported difculty becoming sexually aroused and 33% reported difculty with maintaining arousal. However, 38% of these women also reported too little foreplay before sexual intercourse and 35% disinterest.

Nathan (1986) suggested that, to obtain true estimates of the population rates of FSAD, studies would need to assess the adequacy of sexual stimulation experienced by women. DSMIV criteria also preclude a diagnosis of FSAD if the dysfunction is judged to be due exclusively to the physiological effects of a substance or a general medical condition, including menopausal or postmenopausal reductions in estrogen levels (p. 501). Because prevalence studies rarely obtain information on menopausal status, it is, therefore, important not to regard prevalence rates of lubrication problems as representing clinical diagnoses. Table 4 presents prevalence data reported by women from eight surveys. Most of these studies assessed problems with lubrication and not with subjective arousal or with other indices of genital arousal (e.g., swelling). Exceptions were the study by Dunn, Croft, and Hackett (1998), which asked about problems being sexually aroused, and the Bancroft et al. (2003) study, which included a composite variable (labelled impaired physical response) that comprised items on lack of subjective arousal, lack of pleasant genital tingling, and lack of enjoyment from genitals being touched. In a review of FSAD prevalence data in European countries since the mid-1980s, Fugl-Meyer and Fugl-Meyer (2006) found no studies that separated genital from psychologic arousal or that explicitly combined genital and subjective arousal. As Table 4 shows, the estimated prevalence rates for lubrication difculties have varied widely. Although only assessed in a small number of studies, the duration of sexual problems and/ or the recall period clearly affects prevalence rates (e.g., Mercer et al., 2003; Oberg et al., 2004). Mercer et al. compared prevalence rates for sexual problems reported as lasting at least one month in the past year (referred to here as short-term) with those lasting at least six months (persistent problems) in the last year. Although 9.2% of women reported short-term difculties with lubrication, only 3.7% had persistent problems. Although Mercer et al. did not assess subjective feelings of arousal, the difference in prevalence estimates between shortterm and persistent problems related to lack of interest in sex were striking (40.6% vs. 10.2%, respectively). Hayes, Dennerstein, Bennett, and Fairley (2008) found that changing recall from previous month to one month or more increased prevalence rates for all female sexual dysfunctions. Almost all of the studies in Table 4 reported signicant positive relationships between age and lubrication difculties (e.g., Laumann, Paik, & Rosen, 1999; Najman, Dunne, Boyle, Cook, & Purdie, 2003; Richters, Grulich, de Visser, Smith, & Rissel, 2003). However, few epidemiological studies have recruited older, postmenopausal women. One recent exception was the Global Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors (Laumann et al., 2005), which used computer-assisted telephone interviewing and postal questionnaires in a sample of 9,000 women aged 4080 years from 29 countries. All of the women had intercourse at least once in the previous year. The

123

123
Country United States UK United States UK 1644 Computer-assisted self-interview Telephone interview Structured face-to-face interview ? questionnaires Computer-assisted telephone interview Questionnaires (FSFI ? FSDS) Past 12 mos. 1859 Face-to-face interview 1875 Postal questionnaire Last 3 mos. Several mos. or more during past 12 mos. 2065 Computer-assisted telephone interviewing Previous month Age Method of assessment Time period Prevalence Lubrication problems: 31.2% Impaired arousal: 12.2% Vaginal dryness: 28% Arousal problems: 17.0% Trouble lubricating: 20.6% Trouble lubricating: Lasted at least 1 mo.: 9.2% Lasted at least 6 mos.: 2.6% Australia Sweden Australia Finland 1849 1659 1865 1859 Several mos. or more during past 12 mos. Past 12 mos. At least 1 month in the past 12 mos. Past month Trouble lubricating: 2130% (depending on age) Insufcient lubrication: Manifest: 12%; Mild: 50% Trouble with vaginal dryness: 23.9% Lubrication difculties (met FSFI cut-off of 4.31): 10.9% Met FSFI cut-off and reported distress: 7.0% Arch Sex Behav

Table 4 Prevalence of arousal problems in selected epidemiological studies

Study

N of women

Bancroft et al. (2003)

987; all in heterosexual relationships

Dunn et al. (1998)

979

Laumann et al. (1999)

1,749; all sexually active over last 12 mos.

Mercer et al. (2003)

4,826; all had at least 1 heterosexual partner in last 12 mos.

Najman et al. (2003)

908

Oberg et al. (2004)

1,056; all sexually active during last 12 mos.

Richters et al. (2003)

9,134

Witting et al. (2008)

5,463

Note: manifest = quite often, nearly all the time, and all the time; mild = hardly ever and quite rarely

FSFI Female Sexual Function Index (Rosen et al., 2000); FSDS Female Sexual Distress Scale (Derogatis et al., 2002)

Arch Sex Behav

overall prevalence of lubrication difculties (occasionally, periodically, frequently) varied from 16.1% (Southern Europe) to 37.9% (East Asia); the range for frequent problems was 4.712.1%. Age showed a curvilinear relationship with the likelihood of lubrication difculties in most, but not all, countries. Specically, women aged 5059 years were twice as likely as those aged 4049 years to report lubrication problems; however, women in the oldest age group studied (7080 years) were no more likely to have this complaint than the youngest age group (4049 years). Although this study had several methodological problems (e.g., low response rate, differences in recruitment and method of assessment across sites), the ndings underlined the importance of cultural factors in the experience of sexual problems. Comorbidity Between FSAD and Other Sexual Dysfunctions In the DSM-IV text, under Associated Features and Disorders, the issue of comorbidity was noted: Limited evidence suggests that Female Sexual Arousal Disorder is often accompanied by Sexual Desire Disorders and Female Orgasmic Disorder (p. 501). There is now robust evidence indicating a high degree of comorbidity between FSAD and other sexual disorders, particularly Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD) (Basson et al., 2003; Fugl-Meyer & Fugl-Meyer, 2002; Laumann et al., 1999; Rosen, Taylor, Leiblum, & Bachmann, 1993; Segraves & Segraves, 1991a). In one study of patients with HSDD, 41% of the women had at least one other sexual dysfunction and 18% had diagnoses in all three categories, i.e. desire, arousal, and orgasm (Segraves & Segraves, 1991a). A consistent observation in the literature has been that cases of FSAD seldom present on their own or even as the primary problem (Bancroft, Graham, & McCord, 2001; Basson, McInnes, Smith, Hodgson, & Koppiker, 2002; Heiman, 2002; Heiman & Meston, 1997; Meston & Bradford, 2007; Rosen & Leiblum, 1995). In clinical settings, it has been pointed out that sexual problems in women most often affect all phases of the sexual response cycle (Basson & Weijmar Schultz, 2007). Heiman (2002) noted that there were no controlled treatment studies specically related to FSAD. As discussed earlier, questions about whether FSAD should be considered as a disorder distinct from desire and orgasm were raised in the literature before DSM-IV was introduced (Segraves, 1996a). In a clinical series of 532 women with sexual complaints, 40 (7.5%) met DSM-III-R criteria for having an arousal disorder; however, the majority of these women also met criteria for desire or orgasm disorders. Indeed only eight women (1.5%) had a single diagnosis of arousal disorder (Segraves & Segraves, 1991b). It was concluded that The infrequency with which female arousal disorder is a solitary diagnosis raises the question of whether this should be retained as a diagnostic entity (p. 9). As discussed above, the main reason that FSAD was retained in

DSM-IV was a desire to maintain consistency between male and female diagnostic categories, and between the DSM and ICD-10 classication systems. The Relationship Between Sexual Arousal and Sexual Desire As stated earlier, sexual desire, as an expression of incentive motivation, can be seen as the rst component of sexual arousal and may be experienced together with varying degrees of the other components (e.g., general arousal, genital response) (Bancroft, 2005). Hence, it is not surprising that in addition to signicant comorbidity between desire and arousal disorders, there is also increasing support for the idea that arousal and desire are not distinct phases of sexual response and are not experienced as such by women themselves. Evidence comes from a number of sources. Qualitative research supports the idea that women often do not differentiate between sexual desire or interest and arousal (Beck, Bozman, & Qualtrough, 1991; Brotto, Heiman, & Tolman, 2009; Ellison, 2000; Graham, Sanders, Milhausen, & McBride, 2004). Further, contrary to the assumptions underlying the HSRC model (Tiefer, 1991), there does not appear to be any universal temporal sequence (e.g., from desire to arousal). Women sometimes report sexual interest preceding sexual arousal, and at other times following it (Graham et al., 2004). Other studies have reported signicant correlations between sexual desire and arousal (Beck et al., 1991; Sanders, Graham, & Milhausen, 2008), and it has been suggested that sexual desire and arousal may be two facets of the same process within the sexual response (Beck et al., 1991, p. 454). This suggestion is consistent with the incentive motivation model. Laan and Both (2008) summarized evidence that the experience of sexual desire may follow from rather than precede sexual arousal and concluded that there is no good reason to assume that feelings of desire and arousal are two fundamentally different things (p. 510). Laan and Both suggested that arousal and desire might be distinguished on a phenomenological level in that feelings of arousal might reect the subjective experience of genital changes, and feelings of desire the subjective experience of an action tendency, of a willingness to behave sexually (p. 510). In contrast with men, studies involving clinical samples of women have also demonstrated a signicant overlap between the dimensions of desire and arousal. For example, in their evaluation of the FSFI, Rosen et al. (2000) compared a group of women diagnosed with FSAD with a group of women without sexual complaints. In a principal components analysis of the questionnaire items, the rst component included measures of both sexual desire and arousal (particularly in the FSAD group). It was observed that this nding demonstrates a considerable overlap between the dimensions of desire and arousal in women, consistent with clinical

123

Arch Sex Behav

observation and contrasting with ndings in studies of sexual dysfunction in men (p. 202). However, although acknowledging the overlap between desire and arousal, Rosen et al. stated a clinically based decision was made to separate the mixed factor of desire/arousal into two measurable dimensions (p. 202). In a study that sought to build a model of mid-aged womens sexual arousal, Dennerstein, Lehert, and Burger (2005) found that items on womens sexual responsiveness or arousal were not separable from items relating to sexual desire. Measures of sexual functioning developed for use with men (e.g., the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning (BISF)) (Taylor, Rosen, & Leiblum, 1994) have been found to have very different factor structures when they are modied for use with women. Heiman (2001) noted that the female desire factor was strikingly different on the female BISF questionnaire from the desire factors on the male questionnaire. Heiman concluded that the results from these measures strongly suggest that womens sexuality may be organized differently from that of men (p. 120). In sum, although there is now good evidence that desire and arousal in women are not easy to differentiate, they continue to be dened, and studied, as independent constructs (Graham et al., 2004). The primary reason for this appears to be the need to maintain the continuity of the current DSM-IV classication of separate desire and arousal disorders (Basson et al., 2000; Rosen et al., 2000), as well as the strong historical inuence of Masters and Johnson (1966), Kaplan (1974), and their associated models. Association Between Lubrication Problems and Distress A number of recent studies have assessed personal distress (Criterion B) associated with sexual arousal difculties (e.g., Bancroft et al., 2003; Hayes et al., 2008; King, Holt, & Nazareth, 2007; Oberg et al., 2004; Shifren et al., 2008; Witting et al., 2008). A consistent nding across these studies has been that sexual problems, even if moderate/severe, do not always cause distress. Although lubrication problems appear to be more frequently associated with distress than other sexual problems (Oberg et al., 2004; Witting et al., 2008), in one study, 11% of women classied as having manifest lubrication problems (dened as experience of difculties quite often, nearly all the time, or all of the time) did not report any distress about their symptoms (Oberg et al., 2004). In a study involving 31,581 U.S. women recruited through a national research panel (Shifren et al., 2008), distress was assessed with the Female Sexual Distress Scale (Derogatis, Rosen, Leiblum, Burnett, & Heiman, 2002). Women were classied as having low arousal if they responded never or rarely to three questions: How often do you become sexually aroused?, Are you easily aroused?, and Do you have adequate lubrication? While the ageadjusted prevalence of current low arousal was 25.3%, the

prevalence of arousal problems with associated distress was considerably lower (3.36.0%, depending on age). Physical health problems and current depression were associated with increased odds of arousal problems, as was menopausal status. Bancroft et al. (2003) assessed the prevalence of womens distress about their sexual relationship, as well as distress about their own sexuality in the previous month. Among the women who complained of lubrication difculties (31.2% of their sample), 7.3% reported marked distress about their relationship and 6.5% about their own sexuality. In the overall sample, the best predictors of distress were indicators of emotional and relationship well-being and the quality of the emotional relationship with the partner. Impaired arousal (a composite variable including genital symptoms but also subjective response) was a relatively weak predictor of distress about the sexual relationship. It is noteworthy that lubrication and other physical aspects of arousal, such as orgasm, were not signicant predictors of distress, leading Bancroft et al. to conclude, In general, the predictors of distress about sex did not t well with the DSM-IV criteria for the diagnosis of sexual dysfunction in women (p. 193). King et al. (2007) compared ICD-10 clinical diagnoses of sexual dysfunction with womens own perceptions of whether or not they had a sexual problem and found a signicant discordance between the two. Overall, although 38% of women were deemed to have an ICD-10 diagnosis of a sexual dysfunction, only 18% of women received a diagnosis and also perceived that they had a problem (and only 6% considered their problem moderate to severe). Four percent of women reported lubrication symptoms, but only 2% perceived these as a problem, and even less (0.5%) regarded the problem as somewhat or very distressing. The lower prevalence of lubrication problems in this study may have been due to the relatively young age of the sample (M = 37.8 years). Studies that have investigated the relationship between the experience of sexual problems and satisfaction with sexual relations have similarly found that women with sexual difculties do not necessarily report dissatisfaction. In the study discussed earlier by Frank et al. (1978), while close to half (48%) of the married women in their sample reported difculty getting excited, 86% nonetheless described their sexual relationship as moderately satisfying or very satisfying. Interestingly, however, difculty getting excited was the sexual problem most strongly correlated with sexual dissatisfaction (r = .41); in comparison, difculty in reaching orgasm (r = .22) and inability to have an orgasm (.18) were less correlated with sexual dissatisfaction. In a recent communitybased study of U.S. women aged 3079 years, a 38.4% prevalence rate of sexual problems was obtained, but only 13.7% of the participants reported both sexual problems and dissatisfaction with their sex lives (Lutfey, Link, Rosen, Wiegel, & McKinlay, 2009).

123

Arch Sex Behav

Factors Underlying FSAD Many possible causes of FSAD have been proposed, from physiologic factors (e.g., hormonal, medication, vascular disease) to psychological factors (e.g., anxiety, depression, distraction) (for reviews, see Meston & Bradford, 2007; Nappi, Ferdeghini, & Polatti, 2006; West, Vinikoor, & Zolhoun, 2004). Prior to the introduction of sildenal to treat male erectile problems, there was little investigation of possible physiological factors underlying sexual arousal problems in women. In the last decade, there has been a focus on possible physiological causes of FSAD (e.g., Berman & Bassuk, 2002; Nappi et al., 2006); despite this, any underlying pathophysiology of sexual arousal problems, if it exists, is not well understood (Bancroft, 2009). Relationship difculties and partner variables have consistently predicted reports of sexual problems (Dennerstein et al., 2005; Witting et al., 2008) as well as associated distress (Bancroft et al., 2003; Rosen et al., 2009). Although reduced vaginal lubrication is often attributed to low estrogen levels in postmenopausal women, there is some evidence that vaginal atrophy but not vaginal dryness is associated with decreased estrogen (Laan & van Lunsen, 1997). Based on ndings from a longitudinal dataset involving 438 Australian women who were followed through their menopausal transition, Dennerstein et al. (2005) concluded that prior sexual functioning and relationship variables were more predictive of womens sexual functioning than hormonal factors. Findings from psychophysiological studies of sexual arousal also suggest that arousal problems in healthy premenopausal women are more often associated with inadequate sexual stimulation than with physical causes (van Lunsen & Laan, 2004). Regardingpsychological factors,therehasbeenlessresearchon variables specically associated with FSAD. Negative cognitions and attitudes about sexuality may make women more vulnerable to experiencing arousal difculties (Middleton, Kuffel, & Heiman, 2008; Nobre & Pinto-Gouveia, 2006, 2008). Cognitive distraction from erotic cues, sometimes induced by self-consciousness about body image (Dove & Wiederman, 2000), can also reduce sexual arousal. There is evidence that a history of sexual abuse is more common among women with arousal difculties (Laumann et al., 1999).

Previous Critiques of DSM Criteria and Alternative Classication Systems The DSM-IV classication system for female sexual dysfunction has received considerable criticism (Bancroft et al., 2001; Boyle, 1994; Tiefer, 1996, 2001). Some authors have suggested revised denitions and diagnostic criteria, while preserving the underlying structure of the DSM system, i.e., desire, arousal, orgasm, and pain disorders (Basson et al., 2000, 2003). Others

have called for alternative classication systems (Hartmann et al., 2002; Tiefer, 2001). The Report of the International Consensus Development Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction (Basson et al., 2000) was written following a conference funded by the American Foundation for Urologic Disease in which 19 experts reviewed the DSM-IV criteria. Regarding FSAD, the denition was expanded to include nongenital and subjective dimensions of arousal. Sexual arousal disorder was dened as the persistent or recurrent inability to attain or maintain sufcient mental excitement, causing personal distress, which may be expressed as a lack ofsubjectiveexcitement, orgenital (lubrication/swelling)orother somatic responses (p. 890). The rationale behind the recommendation to change the DSM requirement from marked distress and interpersonal difculty to personal distress was not clear. In 2002 and 2003, an international multidisciplinary group was convened to further review the denitions of womens sexual dysfunctions and recommendations were made for expansion and revision of diagnostic categories (Basson et al., 2003, 2004). Regarding FSAD, criticism was directed at the DSM-IV focus on womens genital response and the omission of both subjective and non-genital physiological changes from the diagnostic criteria. The committee proposed the following three subtypes of FSAD: (1) Subjective sexual arousal disorder; (2) Genital sexual arousal disorder; and (3) Combined genital and subjective arousal disorder. The third subtype was viewed as being the most common clinical presentation and was usually comorbid with lack of sexual interest (p. 226). An important addition to the denition of genital arousal disorder was that it included marked loss of intensity of any genital response including orgasm (i.e., the focus was not just on lubrication). Other recommendations were to clarify the degree of distress (as none, mild, moderate, or marked) and to include the following contextual descriptors of the diagnosis: (1) past factors (e.g., negative upbringing, past trauma); (2) interpersonal difculties (e.g., partner sexual dysfunction); and (3) medical and psychiatric conditions, medications, or substance abuse. The above recommendations for revision of diagnostic criteria preserve the main DSM-IV categories of desire, arousal, and orgasm disorders. In contrast, the New View of Womens Sexual Problems (The Working Group for a New View of Womens Sexual Problems, 2001), written by a group of clinicians and social scientists, offered a new classication system and a woman-centered denition of sexual problems as: discontent or dissatisfaction with any emotional, physical, or relational aspect of sexual experience (p. 5). Criticisms of DSM-IV were that it ignored gender differences in sexuality, relational aspects of womens sexuality, and individual differences in sexual experience among women. The New View classication system is not based on symptom criteria but organized around four possible categories of causes: sociocultural, political, or economic factors; partner and relationship

123

Arch Sex Behav

factors; psychological factors; and medical factors. A study of 49 British women (Nicholls, 2008) evaluated the utility of this system. Womens descriptive accounts of their sexual problems were analysed qualitatively and issues identied in their narratives compared with the New View categories. The ndings suggested a good t; the majority of issues raised by women could be classied using the New View scheme. The majority (65%) of womens sexual difculties were classied as partner- or relationship-related problems. Although this was a small study, it is the only study to date that has evaluated the classication system, and the ndings do provide some support for the clinical utility of the New View scheme. Hartmann et al. (2002) also argued that a new classication system for womens sexual dysfunction was needed and that by simply expanding and continuing DSM-IV criteria and the traditional response cycle classication systems, it is impossible to come to diagnostic categories and subtypes that adequately reect real-life female sexual problems (p. 85). Hartmann et al.s major criticism of the DSM classication system, and also of the revised Basson et al. (2000) denitions, was that female sexual problems do not relate to a single phase of a hypothetical response cycle, but instead reect a more or less global lack of sexual interest, arousability, and arousal (p. 85). Hartmann et al. also recommended that a new classication system take etiological and comorbidity factors into account. In two empirical studies of women with low sexual desire, they found signicant comorbidity and high rates of psychological distress in their samples. Although Hartmann et al. made some suggestions for classifying hypoactive sexual desire disorders, including arousal complaints as a specier for some desire disorders, they did not propose a new classication system, emphasizing instead the need for a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying sexual disorders and, in particular, more qualitative research of womens experiences of sexual problems.

Critique of Specic DSM Criteria for FSAD Specic aspects of the DSM-IV-TR criteria for FSAD will now be considered and recommendations made for revision. Criterion A The essential feature of the diagnosis of FSAD is that there is insufcient vaginal lubrication/swelling (Persistent or recurrent inability to attain or to maintain until completion of the sexual activity, an adequate lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement). The requirement that symptoms be persistent and recurrent has been criticized as overly vague and likely to lead to undue reliance on clinician judgment, with negative consequences for both clinical and epidemiological research (Segraves, Balon, &

Clayton, 2007). As reviewed above, prevalence studies on FSAD have reported rates for short-term problems that are signicantly higher compared to persistent problems (Mercer et al., 2003). Although we have little empirical data comparing reports of sexual problems across different time periods, some authors have recommended more specic duration and severity criteria (Balon, 2008; Balon, Segraves, & Clayton, 2007; Segraves et al., 2007). Specic recommendations for all of the sexual dysfunctions have been that symptoms should be present for 6 months or more and occur in 75% or more of sexual encounters. The basis for choosing lubrication/swelling as the sole criterion, and the omission of subjective excitement/pleasure from the DSM-IV criteria set, was likely related to the erroneous assumption that vaginal lubrication was the female equivalent of male penile erection. As discussed above, there is evidence that increases in vaginal blood ow in women may be a relatively automatic response (Laan & Everaerd, 1995) and one that women may or may not be aware of (Bancroft, 2009). Although many authors attribute this emphasis on genital response to Masters and Johnson (1966), their research demonstrated that many extragenital physiological changes occurred during sexual arousal (e.g., myotonia, nipple erection). In their book on female sexual behavior, Kinsey, Pomeroy, Martin, and Gebhard (1953) also commented that sexual responses obviously involve a great deal more than genital structures and that every part of the mammalian body may be involved whenever there is sexual response, and many parts of the body may respond as notably as the genitalia during sexual contact (p. 623). Recent qualitative studies have likewise found that women report a wide range of physical (genital and nongenital), cognitive/emotional, and behavioral changes with sexual arousal, with genital changes only one dimension, and not necessarily the most salient one (Brotto et al., 2009; Graham et al., 2004). In a focus-group study of women aged 1884 years (Graham et al., 2004), participants described occasions where they experienced vaginal lubrication but were not sexually aroused and other situations where they felt sexually aroused but were not lubricated. Given that sexual arousal clearly involves many physiological and psychological changes, dening problems with sexual arousal only with reference to impaired genital response appears problematic. Another major problem with the lubrication/swelling criterion is that there is little evidence that women with arousal disorder have impaired genital response. In an early study, Morokoff and Heiman (1980) found no signicant differences in VPA between women diagnosed with sexual arousal disorder and a control group of women. In a study of premenopausal women with sexual arousal problems, following suggested denitions of Basson et al. (2003), women were classied into three subtypes: genital, subjective, and combined (subjective and genital) sexual arousal disorder (Brotto, Basson, & Gorzalka, 2004). Only those women in the genital subgroup, characterized by self-reports of impaired genital sensitivity, showed evidence of impaired genital response. The

123

Arch Sex Behav

VPA response of women with subjective or combined symptoms (believed to constitute the majority of those who seek treatment) did not differ from those of a control group of women. Recently, Laan, van Driel, and van Lunsen (2008) evaluated whether women diagnosed with FSAD using DSMIV criteria showed less genital response to visual sexual stimuli than a control group of women without sexual problems. They found no signicant differences between the groups in VPA; however, women with FSAD reported less positive and slightly more negative affect in response to the erotic lms. Laan et al. concluded: The sexual problems these women report are clearly not related to their potential to become genitally arousedIn medically healthy women, impaired genital responsiveness is not a valid diagnostic criterion (p. 1424). There is some evidence that VPA may be impaired in women who have chronic physical illness or following pelvic surgery. For example, studies have reported that women with diabetes (Wincze, Albert, & Bansal, 1993) and women who had undergone radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (but not those having had simple hysterectomies) (Maas et al., 2004) had lower VPA in response to erotic lms than control groups of women. In support of the argument that womens awareness of genital response should not be the central feature of the diagnosis of FSAD is the fact that phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor drugs (PDE-5i), such as sildenal (Viagra), met with little success in controlled treatment trials involving women with FSAD (Basson et al., 2002; Laan, van Lunsen, & Everaerd, 2001). Although these drugs increased genital vasocongestion, this was not associated with any perceived increase in subjective arousal by women (Basson et al., 2002). There is some evidence that the use of personal lubricants has increased in recent years, both for enhancement of sexual pleasure but also to treat problems with vaginal dryness (Herbenick, Reece, Hollub, Satinsky, & Dodge, 2008; Herbenick et al., in press). The issue of lubrication difculties may, therefore, be less relevant today, given the wide availability of these products, at least in Western societies. It should also be noted that lubrication as a positive sign of sexual arousal is culture-specic, as some societies, both in Africa and in the Caribbean, value dry sex, i.e., the use of plants to dry and contract the vagina, for the purpose of increasing sensation for the man during intercourse (van Andel, Korte, Koopmans, BehariRamdas, & Ruysschaert, 2008). In summary, there is strong evidence that the criterion of vaginal lubrication alone is insufcient to diagnose sexual arousal problems in women. The recommendations made below reect the belief that a womans subjective awareness of arousal should be a central component of the symptom criteria and that additional genital and non-genital aspects of physiological response, i.e., not simply lubrication/swelling, also be included. It seems crucial that diagnostic criteria adopted reect the considerable heterogeneity of womens experiences of sexual arousal and individual differences across women.

Criterion B Criterion B requires that the disturbance causes marked distress or interpersonal difculty. There has been considerable discussion in the literature regarding the distress criterion (Althof, 2001; Bancroft et al., 2003; Hayes, 2008; Mitchell & Graham, 2007). Some have argued that personal or interpersonal distress should not be included in the symptom criteria for the diagnosis of sexual dysfunction (Althof, 2001; Segraves et al., 2007). The issue of distress is acknowledged to be a difcult one (Mitchell & Graham, 2007); on the one hand, logically it seems that lack of distress should not preclude a diagnosis from being made (and, as discussed above, we know that some women meet diagnostic criteria for a sexual disorder but report no distress about it; King et al., 2007). On the other hand, without assessing distress, prevalence rates for sexual problems are markedly higher. Some epidemiological studies, which have not assessed distress, have been criticized for producing estimates of sexual dysfunction that are widely agreed to be inated. The best example of this was the publication in the Journal of the American Medical Association of a study on the epidemiology of sexual dysfunction (Laumann et al., 1999). In this widely cited paper, 43% of women and 31% of men were identied as having a sexual dysfunction, described as a largely uninvestigated yet signicant public health problem (p. 544). A 43% prevalence rate of any dysfunction seriously calls into question whether this is indeed pathology or the norm. Distress was not assessed in this study and duration was operationalized as several months or more during the past year. As discussed earlier, studies have consistently reported lower prevalence rates for sexual dysfunction when distress is required (Hayes et al., 2008; Oberg et al., 2004; Witting et al., 2008) and the recall period used also affects prevalence estimates (Hayes et al., 2008). In practice, an individual and/or their partner who is not distressed by a sexual concern is unlikely to seek treatment (Bancroft et al., 2001). Also, Segraves et al. (2007) pointed out that the inclusion of the distress criterion in DSM-IV could be considered an unnecessary addition, given that the introductory text makes explicit that a behavioral pattern can be considered a psychiatric disorder only if it engenders distress or disability. However, assessing distress in a clinical situation, including the distinction between so-called personal distress and interpersonal distress, is clearly important and can inform treatment decisions. A distinction might usefully be made between ascertaining a sexual problem is present (based on self-report and behavior) and diagnosing a sexual dysfunction on the basis of distress and/or impairment in addition to the relevant symptoms. The recommendation made here is that the requirement that distress or interpersonal difculty be present be retained as Criterion B; rather than a categorical assessment of whether distress is present or absent, the degree of distress that women (and their

123

Arch Sex Behav

partners) are experiencing in relation to a sexual problem would be assessed on a dimensional scale (Regier, 2008; Widiger & Samuel, 2005). Criterion C Criterion C requires that the sexual dysfunction is not better accounted for by another Axis I disorder (except another Sexual Dysfunction) and is not due exclusively to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical condition. This criterion seems both unrealistic (in that it is questionable whether it can ever be established that a sexual problem is due exclusively to one or another cause) and inconsistent with more recent approaches to therapy, which emphasize the need for an integrated approach (Graham & Bancroft, 2009). One example of this related to male ED is that the earlier focus on physical causes and treatment using PDE-5i has shifted to a greater recognition of the importance of partner variables and relationships in clinical management of cases (Fisher, Rosen, Eardley, Sand, & Goldstein, 2005; Heiman et al., 2007). In view of the above, I suggest that Criterion C either be revised to acknowledge the fact that, in the majority of cases, the causes of arousal disorders are (1) multifactorial or (2) cannot be specied, or be deleted altogether. DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic Subtypes As mentioned earlier, DSM-IV provides subtypes to indicate the onset, context, and etiological factors associated with the Sexual Dysfunctions (p. 494). The rst two of these subtypes, lifelong vs. acquired and generalized vs. situational, seem potentially useful for clinical purposes, although it is worth noting that, in epidemiological research, these distinctions have very rarely been made. The recommendation made here would be to retain these distinctions, although rather than include these as subtypes they could instead be incorporated as speciers (discussed further below). The nal subtypes, Due to Psychological Factors and Due to Combined Factors, seem to be less relevant for either clinical or research purposes. As discussed above in relation to Criterion C, in practice it is often impossible to ascertain the causes of sexual arousal problems and, in most cases, both psychological and physical factors are implicated (Basson & Weijmar Schultz, 2007).

Over a decade ago, Rosen and Leiblum (1995) commented that the diagnostic nosology continues to be based on Kaplans modeldespite a relative paucity of empirical support for this model (p. 879). There have been several revised denitions and modications to diagnostic criteria put forward over the last decade but, with one notable exception (The Working Group for a New View of Womens Sexual Problems, 2001), all of these have retained the basic DSM categories of desire, arousal, and orgasm disorders. Despite the recognition that using the HSRC as the framework for classifying womens sexual disorders is unsatisfactory, there has been a reluctance to relinquish the diagnostic categories of desire, arousal, and orgasm disorders and return to the drawing board (Mitchell & Graham, 2007). In an article on dilemmas in the pathway of the DSM-IV, Carson (1991) discussed the dangers of tinkering on a supercial level with operational criteria that tend over time to approach the status of revealed truths, notwithstanding their often patently arbitrary nature and the unproductiveness of their outcomes (p. 304). This concern seems pertinent in the context of classication of womens sexual problems; indeed, it appears that the categories of desire and arousal disorders have been reied to some extent. In recognition of the empirical research suggesting a lack of differentiation between sexual desire and arousal in women and the high degree of comorbidity between FSAD and HSDD, the proposal here is to merge these two diagnostic categories. The suggested name for the disorder is Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder. It is recommended that a polythetic approach to the diagnosis of this disorder be used, consistent with many other categories of dysfunction in the DSM. The advantage of this approach is that it recognizes the heterogeneity inherent in womens sexual experiences, and does not prioritize any one type of arousal (e.g., genital, subjective, etc.). A preliminary list of proposed criteria is presented in Table 5. The precise number of symptoms required in order to meet criteria for Sexual Arousal/ Interest Disorder needs further consideration, and eld trials should be conducted to evaluate what number and level of symptoms should be required for a diagnosis. Although there has been little empirical data to inform the choice of specic, severity, and frequency criteria, in view of the evidence that mild and transient sexual problems are very common, and to avoid pathologizing normal variation in sexual experiences (Segraves et al., 2007), it seems important to specify some level of symptoms that are required for a diagnosis. Field trials should be set up to evaluate the validity of using different severity/duration criteria. Speciers A major recommendation in the present review is an expanded use of the category of speciers. Speciers are typically used to describe the course of the disorder or to highlight prominent

Proposed Revision to DSM-IV Category of FSAD This review has highlighted the longstanding dissatisfaction that both researchers and clinicians have expressed about the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for female sexual dysfunction.

123

Arch Sex Behav Table 5 Proposed criteria for Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder A. Lack of sexual interest/arousal, of at least 6 months duration, as manifested by at least three of the following indicators (1) Absent/reduced interest in sexual activity (2) Absent/reduced sexual/erotic thoughts or fantasies (3) No initiation of sexual activity and is not receptive to a partners attempts to initiate (4) Absent/reduced sexual excitement/pleasure during sexual activity (on at least 75% or more of sexual encounters) (5) Absent/reduced genital and/or non-genital physical changes during sexual activity (on at least 75% or more of sexual encounters) B. The disturbance causes clinically signicant distress or impairment Speciers (1) Lifelong or acquired (2) Generalized or situational (3) Partner factors (partners sexual problems, partners health status) (4) Relationship factors (e.g., poor communication, relationship discord, discrepancies in desire for sexual activity) (5) Individual vulnerability factors (e.g., depression or anxiety, poor body image, history of abuse experiences) (6) Cultural/religious factors (e.g., inhibitions related to prohibitions against sexual activity) (7) Medical factors (e.g., illness/medication)

relationship discord, discrepancies in desire for sexual activity); individual vulnerability factors (e.g., depression or anxiety, poor body image, history of abuse experiences); and cultural/ religious factors (e.g., inhibitions related to prohibitions about sexual activity). These speciers are proposed based on previous research that suggest these variables are ones that may be relevant to etiology and/or to choice of treatment.
Acknowledgments The author is a member of the DSM-V Workgroup on Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders. I wish to acknowledge the valuable input I received from members of my Workgroup (Yitzchak Binik, Lori A. Brotto, R. Taylor Segraves) and Kenneth J. Zucker. Feedback from DSM-V Advisors Richard Balon, John Bancroft, Rosemary Basson, Marta Meana, and Leonore Tiefer is greatly appreciated. Reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V Workgroup Reports (Copyright 2009), American Psychiatric Association.

References
Althof, S. (2001). My personal distress over the inclusion of personal distress. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 123125. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author. Balon, R. (2008). The DSM criteria of sexual dysfunction: Need for a change. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 34, 186197. Balon, R., Segraves, R. T., & Clayton, A. (2007). Issues for DSM-V: Sexual dysfunction, disorder, or variation along normal distribution: Toward rethinking DSM criteria of sexual dysfunctions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 198200. Bancroft, J. (2005). The endocrinology of sexual arousal. Journal of Endocrinology, 186, 411427. Bancroft, J. (2009). Human sexuality and its problems (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston/Elsevier. Bancroft, J., Graham, C. A., & McCord, C. (2001). Conceptualizing womens sexual problems. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 95103. Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003). Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 193208. Bartlik, B., & Goldberg, J. (2000). Female sexual arousal disorder. In S. R. Leiblum & R. C. Rosen (Eds.), Principles and practice of sex therapy (3rd ed., pp. 85117). New York: Guilford. Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 5164. Basson, R., Althof, S., Davis, S., Fugl-Meyer, K., Goldstein, I., Leiblum, S., et al. (2004). Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 1, 2434. Basson, R., Berman, J., Burnett, A., Derogatis, L., Ferguson, D., Fourcroy, J., et al. (2000). Report of the International Consensus Development Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction: Denitions and classications. Journal of Urology, 163, 888893. Basson, R., Leiblum, S., Brotto, L., Derogatis, L., Fourcroy, J., FuglMeyer, K., et al. (2003). Denitions of womens sexual dysfunction reconsidered: Advocating expansion and revision. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 24, 221229.

symptoms or to indicate associated behavioral patterns of clinical interest (Beach, Wamboldt, Kaslow, Heyman, & Reiss, 2006, p. 364). Basson et al. (2003) advocated the use of contextual descriptors; based on previous research, they suggested the following three categories of descriptors: (1) negative upbringing/losses/trauma, past interpersonal relationships, cultural/religious restrictions; (2) current interpersonal difculties, partner sexual dysfunction, inadequate stimulation and unsatisfactory sexual and emotional contexts; (3) medical conditions, psychiatric conditions, medications, or substance abuse. These descriptors are similar to the three windows approach put forward by Bancroft (2009). Bancroft suggested that, in a clinical assessment, the following three windows be used to consider factors that might alter or impair an individuals capacity for sexual response: (1) the current situation (including factors such as expectations about sex, negative mood, concerns about pregnancy or sexually transmitted infection); (2) vulnerability to sexual problems (including negative cognitions, earlier trauma or abuse, propensity for sexual inhibition); (3) factors that alter sexual function (including the impact of aging, physical illness, medications). The recommendation is that, in addition to the subtypes Lifelong or Acquired and Generalized or Situational, the proposed speciers for Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder (see Table 5) are: partner factors (e.g., partners sexual problems, partners health status); relationship factors (e.g., poor communication,

123

Arch Sex Behav Basson, R., McInnes, R., Smith, M. D., Hodgson, G., & Koppiker, N. (2002). Efcacy and safety of sildenal citrate in women with sexual dysfunction associated with female sexual arousal disorder. Journal of Womens Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 11, 367377. Basson, R., & Weijmar Schultz, W. (2007). Sexual sequelae of general medical disorders. Lancet, 369, 350352. Beach, S. R. H., Wamboldt, M. Z., Kaslow, N. J., Heyman, R. E., & Reiss, D. (2006). Describing relationship problems in DSM-V: Toward better guidance for research and clinical practice. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 359368. Beck, J. G., Bozman, A. W., & Qualtrough, T. (1991). The experience of sexual desire: Psychological correlates in a college sample. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 443456. Berman, J. R., & Bassuk, J. (2002). Physiology and pathophysiology of female sexual function and dysfunction. World Journal of Urology, 20, 111118. Both, S., Everaerd, W., & Laan, E. (2003). Modulation of spinal reexes by aversive and sexually appetitive stimuli. Psychophysiology, 40, 174183. Boyle, M. (1994). Gender, science, and sexual dysfunction. In T. R. Sarbin & J. I. Kitsuse (Eds.), Constructing the social (pp. 101118). London: Sage Publications. Brotto, L. A., Basson, R., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2004). Psychophysiological assessment in premenopausal sexual arousal disorder. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 1, 266277. Brotto, L. A., Heiman, J. R., & Tolman, D. L. (2009). Narratives of desire in mid-age women with and without arousal difculties. Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224490902792624. Carson, R. C. (1991). Dilemmas in the pathway of the DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 302307. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumi_ re, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. e (in press). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Dennerstein, L., Burrows, G. D., Wood, C., & Hyman, G. (1980). Hormones and sexuality: Effect of estrogen and progestogen. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 56, 316322. Dennerstein, L., Lehert, P., & Burger, H. (2005). The relative effects of hormones and relationship factors on sexual function of women through the natural menopausal transition. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 174180. Derogatis, L. R., Rosen, R., Leiblum, S., Burnett, A., & Heiman, J. (2002). The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 317330. Dove, N. L., & Wiederman, M. W. (2000). Cognitive distraction and womens sexual functioning. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 6778. Dunn, K. M., Croft, P. R., & Hackett, G. I. (1998). Sexual problems: A study of the prevalence and need for health care in the general population. Family Practice, 15, 519524. Ellison, C. (2000). Womens sexualities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger. Everaerd, W., Laan, E., Both, S., & van der Velde, J. (2000). Female sexuality. In L. Szuchman & F. Muscarella (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on human sexuality (pp. 108122). New York: Wiley. Fisher, W. A., Rosen, R. C., Eardley, I., Sand, M., & Goldstein, I. (2005). Experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: The female experience of mens attitudes to life events and sexuality (FEMALES) study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2, 675684. Frank, E., Anderson, C., & Rubinstein, D. (1978). Frequency of sexual dysfunction in normal couples. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 111115. Fugl-Meyer, K. S., & Fugl-Meyer, A. R. (2002). Sexual disabilities are not singularities. International Journal of Impotence Research, 14, 487493. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., & Fugl-Meyer, K. S. (2006). Prevalence data in Europe. In I. Goldstein, C. M. Meston, S. R. Davis, & A. M. Traish (Eds.), Womens sexual function and dysfunction: Study, diagnosis and treatment (pp. 3441). Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor & Francis. Graham, C. A., & Bancroft, J. (2006). Assessing the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction with surveys: What is feasible? In I. Goldstein, C. M. Meston, S. R. Davis, & A. M. Traish (Eds.), Womens sexual function and dysfunction: Study, diagnosis and treatment (pp. 5260). Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor & Francis. Graham, C. A., & Bancroft, J. (2009). The sexual dysfunctions. In M. Gelder, J. Lopez-Ibor, N. Andreasen, & J. Geddes (Eds.), New Oxford textbook of psychiatry (2nd ed., pp. 821832). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Graham, C. A., Bancroft, J., Greco, T., Tanner, A., & Doll, H. A. (2007). Does oral contraceptive-induced reduction in free testosterone adversely affect the sexuality and mood of women? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32, 246255. Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., Milhausen, R., & McBride, K. (2004). Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect womens sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 527538. Hartmann, U., Heiser, K., Ruffer-Hesse, C., & Kloth, G. (2002). Female sexual desire disorders: Subtypes, classication, personality factors and new directions for treatment. World Journal of Urology, 20, 7988. Hayes, R. D. (2008). Assessing female sexual dysfunction in epidemiological studies: Why is it necessary to measure both low sexual function and sexually-related distress? Sexual Health, 5, 215218. Hayes, R. D., Dennerstein, L., Bennett, C. M., & Fairley, C. K. (2008). What is the true prevalence of female sexual dysfunctions and does the way we assess these conditions have an impact? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 777787. Heiman, J. R. (2001). Sexual desire in human relationships. In W. Everaerd, E. Laan, & S. Both (Eds.), Sexual appetite, desire and motivation: Energetics of the sexual system (pp. 117134). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Heiman, J. R. (2002). Sexual dysfunction: Overview of prevalence, etiological factors, and treatments. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 7378. Heiman, J. R., & Meston, C. M. (1997). Evaluating sexual dysfunction in women. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 40, 616629. Heiman, J. R., Talley, D., Bailen, J., Oskin, T., Rosenberg, S., Pace, C., et al. (2007). Sexual function and satisfaction in heterosexual couples when men are administered sildenal citrate (Viagra) for erectile dysfunction: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114, 437447. Herbenick, D., Reece, N., Hollub, A., Satinsky, S., & Dodge, B. (2008). Young female breast cancer survivors: Their sexual function and interest in sexual enhancement products and services. Cancer Nursing, 31, 417425. Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., Ghassemi, A., & Fortenberry, J. D. (in press). Womens vibrator use in romantic relationships: Results from a nationally representative survey in the United States. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. Janssen, E. (2001). Psychophysiological measurement of sexual arousal. In M. W. Wiederman & B. E. Whitley (Eds.), Handbook for conducting research on human sexuality (pp. 131171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Kaplan, H. S. (1974). The new sex therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 412. King, M., Holt, V., & Nazareth, I. (2007). Womens views of their sexual difculties: Agreement and disagreement with clinical diagnoses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 281288.

123

Arch Sex Behav Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. Kukkonen, T. M., Binik, Y. M., Amsel, R., & Carrier, S. (2007). Thermography as a physiological measure of sexual arousal in both men and women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 93105. Kukkonen, T. M., Binik, Y. M., Amsel, R., & Carrier, S. (2009). An evaluation of the validity of thermography as a physiological measure of sexual arousal in a non-university adult sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9496-4. Laan, E., & Both, S. (2008). What makes women experience desire? Feminism & Psychology, 18, 505514. Laan, E., & Everaerd, W. (1995). Determinants of female sexual arousal: Psychophysiological theory and data. Annual Review of Sex Research, 6, 3276. Laan, E., & Janssen, E. (2007). How do men and women feel? Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 278290). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Laan, E., van Driel, E. M., & van Lunsen, R. H. W. (2008). Genital responsiveness in healthy women with and without sexual arousal disorder. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 14241435. Laan, E., & van Lunsen, R. H. (1997). Hormones and sexuality in postmenopausal women: A psychophysiological study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 18, 126133. Laan, E., van Lunsen, R. H., & Everaerd, W. (2001). The enhancement of vaginal vasocongestion by sildenal in healthy premenopausal women. Journal of Womens Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 11, 357365. Laumann, E. O., Nicolosi, A., Glasser, D. B., Paik, A., Gingell, C., Moreira, E., et al. (2005). Sexual problems among women and men aged 4080 years: Prevalence and correlates identied in the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. International Journal of Impotence Research, 17, 3957. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunctions in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537544. Levin, R. J. (2003). The ins and outs of vaginal lubrication. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18, 509513. Levin, R. J. (2007). Discussion paper. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 129136). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Levin, R. J. (2008). Critically revisiting aspects of the human sexual response cycle of Masters and Johnson: Correcting errors and suggesting modications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 23, 393399. Lutfey, K. E., Link, C. L., Rosen, R. C., Wiegel, M., & McKinlay, J. B. (2009). Prevalence and correlates of sexual activity and function in women: Results from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 514527. Maas, C. P., ter Kuile, M. M., Laan, E., Tuijnman, C. C., Weyenborg, P. T., Trimbos, J. B., et al. (2004). Objective assessment of sexual arousal in women with a history of hysterectomy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111, 456462. Maravilla, K. R., & Yang, C. C. (2008). Magnetic resonance imaging and the female sexual response: Overview of techniques, results, and future directions. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 15591571. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown. Mercer, C. H., Fenton, K. A., Johnson, A. M., Wellings, K., Macdowall, W., McManus, S., et al. (2003). Sexual function problems and help seeking behaviour in Britain: National probability sample survey. British Medical Journal, 327, 426427. Meston, C. M., & Bradford, A. (2007). Sexual dysfunctions in women. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 233256. Middleton, L. S., Kuffel, S. W., & Heiman, J. R. (2008). Effects of experimentally adopted sexual schemas on vaginal response and subjective sexual arousal: A comparison between women with sexual arousal disorder and sexually healthy women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 950961. Mitchell, K., & Graham, C. A. (2007). Two challenges for the classication of sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 15521558. Morokoff, P. J., & Heiman, J. R. (1980). Effects of erotic stimuli on sexually functional and dysfunctional women: Multiple measures before and after sex therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18, 127137. Najman, J. M., Dunne, M. P., Boyle, F. M., Cook, M. D., & Purdie, D. M. (2003). Sexual dysfunction in the Australian population. Australian Family Physician, 32, 951954. Nappi, R. E., Ferdeghini, F., & Polatti, F. (2006). Mechanisms involved in desire and arousal dysfunction. In I. Goldstein, C. M. Meston, S. R. Davis, & A. M. Traish (Eds.), Womens sexual function and dysfunction: Study, diagnosis and treatment (pp. 203209). Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor & Francis. Nathan, S. G. (1986). The epidemiology of the DSM-III psychosexual dysfunctions. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 12, 267281. Nicholls, L. (2008). Putting the New View classication scheme to an empirical test. Feminism and Psychology, 18, 515526. Nobre, P. J., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2006). Dysfunctional sexual beliefs as vulnerability factors for sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 6875. Nobre, P. J., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2008). Cognitions, emotions, and sexual response: Analysis of the relationship among automatic thoughts, emotional responses, and sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 652661. Oberg, K., Fugl-Meyer, A. R., & Fugl-Meyer, K. S. (2004). On categorization and quantication of womens sexual dysfunctions: An epidemiological approach. International Journal of Impotence Research, 16, 261269. Regier, D. A. (2008). Dimensional approaches to psychiatric classication. In J. E. Helzer, H. C. Kraemer, R. F. Krueger, H.-U. Wittchen, P. J. Sirovatka, & D. A. Regier (Eds.), Dimensional approaches in diagnostic classication (pp. xviixxvii). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association. Richters, J., Grulich, A. E., de Visser, R. O., Smith, A. M. A., & Rissel, C. E. (2003). Sexual difculties in a representative sample of adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 164170. Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, D., et al. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 191208. Rosen, R. C., & Leiblum, S. R. (1995). Treatment of sexual disorders in the 1990s: An integrated approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 877890. Rosen, R. C., Shifren, J. L., Monz, B. U., Odom, D. M., Russo, P. A., & Johannes, C. B. (2009). Correlates of sexually-related personal distress in women with low sexual desire. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 15491560. Rosen, R. C., Taylor, J. F., Leiblum, S. R., & Bachmann, G. A. (1993). Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women: Results of a survey study of 329 women in an outpatient gynaecological clinic. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 19, 171188. Sand, M., & Fisher, W. A. (2007). Womens endorsement of models of female sexual response: The nurses sexuality study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 708719. Sanders, S. A., Graham, C. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2008). Predicting sexual problems in women: Relevance of sexual inhibition and sexual excitation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 241251.

123

Arch Sex Behav Segraves, R. T. (1996a). Female sexual arousal disorder. In T. A. Widiger, A. Frances, H. A. Pincus, R. Ross, M. B. First, & D. W. Wakeeld (Eds.), DSM-IV sourcebook (Vol. 2, pp. 11031107). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Segraves, R. T. (1996b). Male erectile disorder. In T. A. Widiger, A. Frances, H. A. Pincus, R. Ross, M. B. First, & D. W. Wakeeld (Eds.), DSM-IV sourcebook (Vol. 2, pp. 11091114). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Segraves, R. T., Balon, R., & Clayton, A. (2007). Proposal for changes in diagnostic criteria for sexual dysfunctions. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 567580. Segraves, R. T., & Segraves, K. B. (1991a). Hypoactive sexual desire disorder: Prevalence and comorbidity in 906 subjects. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17, 5558. Segraves, R. T., & Segraves, K. B. (1991b). Diagnosis of female arousal disorder. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 6, 913. Sherwin, B. B. (1991). The impact of different doses of estrogen and progestin on mood and sexual behavior in postmenopausal women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 72, 336343. Shifren, J. L., Monz, B. U., Russo, P. A., Segreti, A., & Johannes, C. B. (2008). Sexual problems and distress in United States women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 112, 970978. Simons, J. S., & Carey, M. P. (2001). Prevalence of sexual dysfunctions: Results from a decade of research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 177219. Singer, B. (1984). Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction. Journal of Sex Research, 20, 230240. Sintchak, G., & Geer, J. H. (1975). A vaginal photoplethysmograph system. Psychophysiology, 12, 113115. Suh, D. D., Yang, C. C., Cao, Y., Heiman, J. R., Garland, P. A., & Maravilla, K. R. (2004). MRI of female genital and pelvic organs during sexual arousal. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 25, 153162. Taylor, J. F., Rosen, R. C., & Leiblum, S. R. (1994). Self-report assessment of female sexual function: Psychometric evaluation of the Brief Index of Sexual Function for Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 627643. The Working Group for a New View of Womens Sexual Problems. (2001). A new view of womens sexual problems. In E. Kaschak & L. Tiefer (Eds.), A new view of womens sexual problems (pp. 18). New York: Haworth Press. Tiefer, L. (1991). Historical, scientic, clinical, and feminist criticisms of the human sexual response cycle model. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2, 123. Tiefer, L. (1996). The medicalization of sexuality: Conceptual, normative, and professional issues. Annual Review of Sex Research, 7, 252282. Tiefer, L. (2001). Arriving at a New View of womens sexual problems: Background, theory, and activism. In E. Kaschak & L. Tiefer (Eds.), A new view of womens sexual problems (pp. 6398). New York: Haworth Press. Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual arousal, motivation, and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 168193. van Andel, T., Korte, S., Koopmans, D., Behari-Ramdas, J., & Ruysschaert, S. (2008). Dry sex in Suriname. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 116, 8488. van Lunsen, R. H. W., & Laan, E. (2004). Genital vascular responsiveness and sexual feelings in midlife women: Psychophysiologic, brain, and genital imaging studies. Menopause, 11, 741748. West, S. L., Vinikoor, L. C., & Zolhoun, D. (2004). A systematic review of the literature on female sexual dysfunction prevalence and predictors. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15, 40172. Widiger, T. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2005). Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFifth Edition. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 494504. Wincze, J. P., Albert, A., & Bansal, S. (1993). Sexual arousal in diabetic females: Psychophysiological and self-report measures. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 587601. Witting, K., Santtila, P., Varjonen, M., Jern, P., Johansson, A., von der Pahlen, B., et al. (2008). Female sexual dysfunction, sexual distress, and compatibility with partner. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 25872599. World Health Organization. (1992). ICD-10: International statistical classication of diseases and related health problems (10th ed.). Geneva: Author.

123