Advanced Driving Sensitivity Concepts
Advanced Driving Sensitivity Concepts
Sensitivity Concepts
By Warren Chamberlain
Drift Angle = The amount of drift (in degrees) that the tire/car is traveling away from the direction the
(AKA Slip Angle) front or rear wheels are pointing; so, the amount of deviation from the intended path.
Drift angles can be produced by both heavily loaded and lightly loaded tires. Both can pro-
duce the same amount of drift, but the drift is caused by different types/levels of traction.
Below is an example of two front tires with the same drift angle; the outside (driver’s right)
front tire is drifting due to heavy loading and traction distorting the sidewall and contact
patch. The inside front tire (left) is drifting due to less than optimum loading causing re-
duced traction. (so, both a ‘loaded drift’ and a ‘light drift’ on the same end of the car.)
Understeer = The handling condition that occurs when the front tires drift more than the rear
(push) tires. This can be caused by either insufficient or excessive loading of the front
tires.
Oversteer = The handling condition that occurs when the rear tires drift more than the front
(loose) tires. This can be caused by either insufficient or excessive loading of the rear
tires.
Balance = The handling condition that occurs when the front and rear tires are drifting the
same amount. This happens naturally & briefly at a turn’s rotation point, but never
for long, otherwise you’d eventually just drift diagonally off the track. This can also
be made to happen by a skilled drive who understands loads & drift angles.
Percent Slip = The difference between a tire's free-rolling speed and it’s actual rotational speed,
(longitudinal) which can be greater (under acceleration), or less (under braking).
Stiction = This type of traction is generated from an optimum combination of interlock and
friction, which occurs as a result of applying an optimum amount of energy
(speed) and load to a tire for a given turn. When done correctly the tire produces
optimum drift angles at the stiction peak, which results in maximum traction, and
minimum tire abuse such as overheating and scrub, (as illustrated by the green
peak in the image below). Optimum drift angle is a function of a tire’s design (9
degrees in the example below and maybe 5-6 degrees for more modern tires).
Cornering Force vs Drift Angle – curve ‘B’ below - (From Carol Smith’s book Tune to Win).
Slide = A relatively low level of traction caused by the tire not carrying sufficient load to
produce the amount of stiction or friction needed to create maximum traction.
Skid = Intermittent losses of traction caused by the inability to keep the tire in contact
with (or ‘hooked up to’) the track surface (e.g. bumps, driver induced energy
waves, excessive throttle, etc.).
Scrub = A high level of traction produced by a tire that is overloaded (with accelera-
tion/deceleration and/or cornering forces) to the point that it is producing larger
than optimum drift angles, and therefore most of the traction is being produced
by friction.
Light Drift = A relatively lightly loaded tire that produces a lot of drift angle, while still produc-
ing a good amount of traction. For example, the front tires on a car that is
understeering slightly out of a high-speed sweeper.
(See the Ronnie Peterson example under the Drift Angle section.)
Loaded Drift = A tire heavily loaded with a combination of acceleration/deceleration and corner-
ing forces that is producing optimum (or greater than optimum) drift angles.
(See the Yellow #11 car image under the Drift Angle section.)
4 Wheel Drift = I don’t believe that a true ‘4 wheel drift’ can occur for more than a brief moment,
(the myth) and certainly not all the way out of a turn.
That is, if you’re driving fast, either the front end is drifting more (on the way into
the turn) or the back end is drifting more (on the way out of the turn). In the clas-
sic, car cranked sideways, tail out, power on out of a turn, example of a ‘4 wheel
drift’ (see below) there are only two tires drifting (the rears). The front tires are
managing: the drift, the rear tire loading, and the trajectory of the car, by being
pointed into (in the direction of) the drift at approximately the same (or a few de-
grees less) angle as the drift. That means the front tires would have essentially
zero drift angle. So, the classic 4 wheel drift is actually a 2 wheel drift, but it’s still
cool as hell!
Cornering/Driving Terms
Yaw Rotation = The point in a turn at which your car rotates around its center of mass (stops en-
Point tering and starts exiting the turn).
Another way to think of this is the point when the front to rear centerline of the
car rotates from being greater than tangent to the ‘line’ being driven, to being less
than tangent (so, when the car stops pointing to the outside of the line being
driven and starts pointing toward the inside of the line.
The yaw rotation occurs naturally in every turn (usually near the apex), but you
can (and should) control when it happens by controlling your car's Yaw Attitude.
Yaw Attitude = The angle at which you place your car on the line you intend to drive.
The contact patches of your four tires describe a rectangular area. You can con-
trol the angle, or orientation, of your car’s rectangle, with respect to the tangent
of the Line you’re driving, by using various driving technique and/or setup
changes. If you're understeering, the front of your rectangle is pointing away from
the turn; if oversteering, it is pointed toward the inside of the turn.
Trajectory = The direction the car is traveling, which is determined by how drift angles influ-
ence the car’s yaw attitude in relation to the ‘line’ being driven.
Cornering Plan = The plan for getting around a corner at maximum speed, which involves manag-
ing energy flow (with the energy cycle), to apply loads to the tires, to create the
traction & drift angles that will influence the car’s yaw attitude, which will ulti-
mately interact with the line being driven to control the car’s trajectory (and there-
fore speed potential) through the turn.
For me, almost immediately after I started racing, I could feel what was happening in my car and predict
what was going to happen, but it seamed like black magic... like I didn’t really have conscious
understanding and/or control of it. I wanted more; I wanted to understand where the sensitivity was coming
from, and how I was able to translate what I was feeling into a meaningful interpretation that would allow
me to confidently and consistently take my car to ‘the limit.’
As I gained more experience, knowledge, and sensitivity, I realized that a car at speed (or more
specifically, the kinetic energy stored in the car) behaves like a liquid. Hit the brakes, and it flows forward,
hit the throttle and it flows back, turn the wheel and it flows diagonally into the outside front tire. When
turning, the energy also flows in yaw around the car’s center of mass. And, like any liquid, all of these
flowing movements start gradually and build with time as long as more energy continues to be applied.
Also, the liquid’s viscosity is different from car to car, for example; super low for karts (like water), low for
small formula cars (like milk or buttermilk), and the viscosity continues rising as the cars get heavier.
So, I began to see my car’s chassis as a pan full of this liquid, the faster I went, the fuller it got. When I
needed to make a tire work for me (to enter a turn for example), I thought of making driving inputs that
would create a controlled flow of energy... pouring it through the suspension/spring/shock and into the tire.
Since tires require load to create traction, and they keep making more traction as load increases until the
tire’s performance limit is reached, I began to think of my tires as water balloons. However, I thought of
them as very delicate balloons because the liquid energy had to be poured into them gradually or they
wouldn’t have time to expand... too much energy too fast and they would effectively rupture, spilling the
energy and likely causing at least a loss of performance if not control.
This relationship between a tire’s ultimate traction capacity and the load it’s carrying is why anyone,
regardless of how ‘fast’ you are, can spin at less than maximum speed/performance. Load a tire
insufficiently, and you can spin even if it’s only performing at 1/2 of its ultimate capability. Likewise, pour
half the load into a tire carefully, and then dump the rest in and you can spin because you did not give the
tire’s capacity time to expand to it’s design limit.
The liquid analogy also address how energy can move in controlled currents, or in uncontrollable waves if
not properly managed. The idea of uncontrolled waves is especially true in very high speed turns. For
example, if the back end steps out, you must recognize that very early or you’ll likely never catch up (you’ll
spin the direction the back end is going). If you do get correction in to ‘build a dam’ against the energy
flow, but you don't plan for the wave rebounding off the dam (you’ll end up ‘over correcting’ and spin the
opposite direction).
So, what does speed as a liquid mean in practice? An example might be:
1) When it comes time to turn, I try to carefully pour just the right amount of energy, at just the right rate, into the
outside front tire to start the turn. The objective is to allow the tire to create maximum performance while avoiding
the creation of unwanted energy waves/oscillation because energy waves/oscillations can unbalance the car by
changing the loads on the tires in undesirable ways.
2) When the turn is initiated, I turn my attention to how the tire loading is progressing towards its peak performance,
while also monitoring how the traction and direction change is starting a rotational flow of energy around the car’s
center of mass.
3) As the front tire load/traction peaks, and the car approaches the apex of the turn, the rotational flow is gaining
strength, so my attention turns to quickly and carefully moving the energy from the outside front tire to the outside
rear tire to ‘check’ the rotational flow and orient car for optimum acceleration out of the turn.
While traction and ‘the limit’ can be sensed, interpreted, and predicted (all successful racers do
so naturally; intuitively), they are very abstract concepts to try and describe and/or understand
intellectually. That is, they can be experienced, but it’s hard to unravel the many factors (driver
input, car type, car setup, tires, environment, etc.) that interact to, ultimately produce the
maximum driver/car performance potential.
Once I realized that speed feels like a liquid to me, I needed a way to think about how I could
use that realization to understand the whole process of cornering so that I could not only do it
predictably and consistently at the limit, but so I could also observe and optimize the process.
After thinking about it, I realized that energy doesn’t just flow linearly into the tires, instead it
flows and grows cyclically over time. It starts with one or more driver inputs, and then it grows as
it travels through the following four interrelated elements or phases:
2 - That energy pours into one or more tires and produces load.
4 - That traction produces forces that act on the car’s center of mass.
So, the cycle starts with a driver input placing a small amount of energy in motion, and then the
energy level grows moment-by-moment as the forces acting on the car cause more energy to
enter the cycle.
Ÿ Equilibrium between the energy cycle and tire is reached. That is, the tire contains the
maximum amount of energy it can handle (and therefore is producing the maximum traction it
can). When equilibrium is reached the energy cycle reverses and the energy dissipates from
the tire back into the chassis.
Ÿ There is no longer sufficient energy (speed) available to increase the cycle’s energy level,
regardless of the tire’s capability. For example, not enough speed was carried into the turn.
Ÿ The driver executes an input that interrupts the energy cycle, and/or moves the energy from
the current cycle to another location (tire).
Once initiated, the energy cycle can be managed with minimal mental resources if it is evaluated
by recognition (how well it is matching what is expected) instead of the much higher cognitive
load method of analysis, which requires a great deal of attention as the sensations from the
cycle are continually evaluated to interpret their meaning.
4 - Forces
Traction creates forces that act on
the car’s center of mass. Including the
critical force of yaw rotation
3 - Traction 1 - Energy
Tire loads generate
both traction and
Flow
drift (slip) angles. Driver input causes
energy to start moving
(flowing) through the
chassis and suspension,
and into one or
more tires.
2 - Tire Loads
Energy flowing
Into the tire(s)
becomes loads.
It’s easiest to visualize how the energy cycle grows as an animation, so a link is provided below.
4 - Forces
Traction creates forces
that act on the car’s center of mass,
which causes additional energy
(if available) to be drawn into the cycle.
Click to View
an Animation
State of Equilibrium
When the forces acting on the car
equals the energy flowing from
the car, the energy flow stops
& reverses, or is transferred
to another tire as the
result of another
driver input.
1 - Energy
3 - Traction
Tire loads generate Flow
traction and the After driver input
ensuing Drift puts the cycle in
(slip) Angles. motion, the energy
flowing into the cycle
builds over time; driven by
the forces acting on the car.
0 - Origin
Driver Input starts
the energy cycle.
2 - Tire Loads
Energy flows
Into the tire(s) and
becomes loads.
This is easiest to visualize as an animation, so you a side and perspective view are provided
(link below).
Cycle Diameter
Represents the amount of traction (G load & drift angle)
the energy/load/tire combination is producing.
Click to View
Animations
State of Equilibrium
When the forces acting on the car
equals the energy flowing from
the car, the energy flow stops
& reverses, or is transferred
to another tire as the result
of another driver input.
Cycle Height
Total amount of energy Cycle Rotation
in the cycle (Including the Frequency
energy stored in springs
Represents the energy level’s
and tire deformations) . rate of change, which is impacted by
multiple things including the available
energy (the car’s speed and weight),
the coefficient of friction between the
tires and track, how aggressive the
driver input is, etc.
(More rotations = a slower cycle)
Origin
Driver Input starts
the energy cycle.
So, for example, braking hard, and turning a kart into a sharp turn, would cause the energy to
flow very quickly; producing a very fast energy cycle with fewer rotations before reaching energy
equilibrium.
1 - Energy Flow
3 - Traction
Visual representation
of tire-specific
2 - Tire Loads energy cycles.
When it comes to monitoring and managing the energy cycle, I prefer to deal with one tire at a
time, because from a driver perspective, when cornering, there is only one critical contact patch at
any given time (the outside front tire from turn entry to rotation/apex, and the outside rear tire for
the remainder of the turn). When braking in a straight line, I focus on the tire that is most load
sensitive (most likely to lock). Taking this one-tire approach profoundly simplifies my mental load
when driving, which creates ‘free’ mental resources for other tasks such improving sensitivity, race
craft, performance evaluation, etc.
...
3) Once the car starts rotating, the rotational momentum will continue
to build until it goes out of control and the car spins. So, the driver must
maintain control by executing additional inputs (throttle and/or steering),
to move energy from the outside front tire to the outside rear tire so that
it can produce the loads/traction required to manage the rotation.
4) If rotation control is properly timed and executed, the rate and amount
of rotation can precisely controlled, which allows the car to be placed
the yaw angle that produces optimum rear tire drift angle, while also
placing the car on the optimum trajectory/line to complete the turn.
NOTE: One important point is that it takes a lot of energy to create drift angles
by loading a tire to the point that it deforms and its contact patch twists. That
kinetic energy (speed) is delivered via an energy cycle that the driver creates to
manipulate the complex relationship between energy flow, tire load, traction,
drift-angle, and forces. So the driver ultimately determines the growth rate and
limit for an energy cycle, but some other factors can influence this are:
1) There can simply not be enough energy (speed) carried into a turn, so
sufficient energy is not available to load the tires to the limit of their capabilities.
2) Too much energy can be carried into a turn, and when that excessive
energy is pored into the tire, it overloads it causing the excess energy to be
dissipated (wasted) by scrubbing off rubber and generating heat.
3) Energy can be poured into the tire too quickly (or to roughly) so the tire doesn’t
1) The energy cycle starts have time to ‘stretch’ to it’s maximum capacity. The excess energy simply ‘spills’
with driver inputs (brake out of the undersized vessel (tire), which can often result in an ‘underloaded’ spin.
and/or steering), and 4) The driver can consciously or unconscious perform inputs that alter
builds with time to it’s Max the energy cycle’s growth, and/or transfer it to another tire.
level (aka equilibrium).
Copyright Warren Chamberlain (SpeedCraft) 2019 Page 17
SpeedCraft - Advanced Driving Concepts
Concept #4 - 2D & 3D Traction Circles
In the same way that the energy cycle provides a way to think about how driving inputs influence
energy flow, and ultimately the car’s behavior, the traction circle give us a way of thinking in a more
detailed way about how our tires are working, and how the energy/load we control as drivers
impacts their performance and longevity.
The idea of the traction circle (what I call the two-dimensional traction circle) has been around,
basically unchanged, for at least 50 years. It’s a very effective tool for visualizing a tire’s maximum
longitudinal and lateral performance potential. it’s also effective at illustrating the idea that it’s
possible (really critical) to combine lateral and longitudinal forces to achieve maximum performance
throughout a turn.
However, the 2D traction circle does have some limitations or weaknesses (explained in the
following pages), so I came up with a visualization tool; the three-dimensional traction circle. The
3D traction circle provides the information from the 2D traction circle, plus additional information
about full tire performance potential and traction types, while also dovetailing nicely with the
concepts of speed as a liquid and the energy cycle.
Basically the 3D traction circle is based on the tire’s performance potential curves. For longitudinal
performance, the (percent slip vs coefficient of friction) curve, and for lateral performance the (drift
angle vs G load). Together, these curves represent the tire’s full performance potential (all the way
from unloaded to massively overloaded).
When viewed in 3D, the tire’s potential appears as a vessel into which the driver can pour energy to
create loads, traction, and drift angles. The diameter and height of the vessel changed dynamically
based on it’s current load, which reflect the fact that you must bring a tire to full potential by
gradually pouring energy into it to create load/traction. That is, you must give the tire time to expand
to its performance potential; pour too much energy too quickly, and the excess energy will ‘spill’
before the tire can ‘expand’ to hold it, which will likely result in a loss of control.
Braking
force
The maximum force the The gray circle
tire can produce when represents the
optimally loaded. 2D traction circle
Right Left
turn turn
force force
The tire is
Accelerating
producing no force.
force (e.g. not moving
or off the track)
2D Traction
Circle
The 2D traction circle shows
the tire’s performance potential
from zero potential to
Coefficient of Coefficient of
maximum potential because it
friction for friction for is a reflection of the area from
longitudinal longitudinal
deceleration acceleration the origin to the peaks of the
force force
tire’s performance curves...
25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25
Percent Slip Percent Slip Percent Slip The Drift Angle vs G Load
Curve Peaks curve (for lateral force) and the
Percent Slip vs Coefficient of
Braking
Friction curve (for longitudinal
force).
2D Traction
Circle
Right Left
Turn Turn
Accelerating
(cornering force)
(cornering force)
G Loads
G Loads
Braking
Right Left
Turn Turn
Accelerating
Ÿ Interlock
Ÿ Sticktion
Ÿ Friction
(or Scrub in the extreme)
To make it, I ‘swept’ a tire’s longitudinal percent slip curves (red & green curves below) and the
lateral G curves (blue curves below) into a 3D shape. The opening in the shape represents the
‘vessel’ into which energy can be poured to create load, which creates traction, which creates
drift angles.
A tire’s capabilities change with load, so the 3D traction circle should also be thought of as
varying in size (height, diameter, and vessel capacity) depending on the energy/load placed into
the tire. So, from nothing (no 3D traction circle if there is no load) to full size (as shown below,
which represents the extent of the tire’s capabilities when being massively overloaded).
The 3D traction circle is not a perfect model, but for me it’s still very useful.
Contact Patch
Interlock Area
Drift Area
Interlock Range 1- 8° of drift angle Stiction Range 8 - 12° of drift angle Friction/Scrub 12 - 20+° of drift angle
If you imagine the continuum of traction types ranges from interlock (blue), through sticktion (green) and
finishes at friction/scrub (red), then hopefully you can see below the areas of the 3D traction circle in which
those tire performance levels reside.
Longitudinal Tire
Performance
Lateral Tire
Performance
NOTE: I’m not very good with my 3D software yet, so I’m just trying to get the idea across with these very rough
images and animations (link below). Please try to imagine that the energy cycle (orange spiral) does not venture
outside of the empty (hollow) portion of the 3D traction circle, which represents the variable size vessel into which
energy can be poured. Also imagine the orange spiral just leads the 3DTS growth rate (doesn’t run so far ahead).
I believe the key to optimum performance in any turn is managing yaw rotation (rotation around the
car’s center of mass relative to the line being driven).
Pink shows the ‘line’ the driver is The green & red arrow combinations show
attempting to travel. Blue shows the how the front and rear drift angles change
car’s orientation on the line, and it’s relative to the car’s orientation as
approximate actual direction of travel. the car travels through a turn.
By managing rotation, I mean strategically influencing one or more of the three elements of rotation:
location, rate, and amount.
The location where rotation occurs is critical because it determines the end of the turn’s entry phase,
and the beginning of the exit phase, which mean it also signifies when you can get back on the gas.
The rate and amount of rotation profoundly influences how aggressively you can (or must) get on the
gas, and how hard and efficiently you use your tires as a result of doing so. However, going back to
the speed as a liquid concept, one other related factor that must also be taken into consideration
when managing the rotation speed is how much momentum the rotational energy has and/or is
building. The rotation momentum is influenced by the overall energy level (speed) of the car, and the
time that un-managed rotation has been occurring.
If any reasonable amount of drift angle is carried into a turn, the car will always rotate naturally as it
goes around the turn (typically at or near the apex). If the car did not rotate naturally, it could not
finish the turn. However, fast drivers almost always instinctively, or knowingly, manipulate at least one
of the rotation factors in each turn. But to be clear, the ‘change’ in rotation can be very subtle, like a
few feet earlier or later than the natural location, or a few degrees more or less rotation amount, etc.
In general, the faster the turn, the more rotational energy and momentum there will be. However,
rotation speed and momentum can be influenced with the energy cycle by manipulating the level of
energy/load/traction for the outside front tire relative to the turn-in point. That is, turning in and letting
the tire loads grow gradually will produce less rotational momentum, and a slower rotation. Whereas,
‘pinning’ the front end (with a lot of trail braking) to aggressively pitch the car into a slow turn, will
produce a lot or rotational speed, but not as much momentum as a high-speed turn.
The point where the car goes tangent to the line being driven (where the front and rear drift angles
will be relatively equal) is one of the most critical parts of any turn because while the front/rear drift
angles might be the same, there is not enough energy available to give either tire optimum
load/performance. This is the case because the energy from the energy cycle used to optimize tire
loads, etc. for the entry phase of the turn, is now being split between the front and rear tires as it
either directly (via driver inputs), or indirectly (via a combination of natural energy cycle collapse +
rotational momentum) moves towards the outside rear tire. However, you cannot allow the
energy/load to get to the outside rear tire when it feels like it; you must take control of the situation
and get optimum load on that outside rear tire quickly enough that you can control the rotational
momentum and rotation angle, but without inadvertently adding to the rotational momentum. Anyway,
this tire loading ‘no man’s land” at mid rotation is why ‘they’ always say “avoid coasting at the apex.”
Anyway, when rotation begins, the rate is pretty much already established by the way you drove the
turn’s entry phase. At that point it’s up to the driver to manage the amount of rotation. Again, this is
done using driver inputs to influence the energy cycle so that optimal load is placed on the outside
rear tire. To accomplish this, the driver has three tools: acceleration, counter steering, and timing.
Accelerating will do two things: 1) Transfer energy from the outside front tire’s energy cycle to the
outside rear tire’s energy cycle. 2),Increase the car’s overall energy/speed.
Counter steering will pour energy out of the outside rear tire into the chassis and/or front tire.
Timing is what makes accelerating and/or counter steering work in the context of the current rotation
rate, rotation momentum, and objective of the corner exit phase. For example, with a low-
momentum, high-speed rotation (e.g. pitching the car into a low speed turn), the rotation amount can
typically be controlled by waiting for the car to rotate the desired amount, and then getting hard on
the gas to ‘hook’ the outside rear tire up, stop the rotation, and aggressively accelerate out of the turn
(fine tuning with counter steering as needed); hard acceleration out being the ‘exit phase objective’.
However, when the car is rotating with more momentum, you must get out in front of the rotation
‘wave’, and take the momentum into consideration when timing the ‘checking’ of the rotation. Also,
you must use the accelerator with much more finesse because the tire will already contain a lot of
energy, so if you add too much more energy, too quickly, you will end up ‘spilling’ it, which will result
in an increase of rotational momentum instead of ‘checking’ it.
That’s the basics of rotation, so now we’ll take it a step farther and move on to the related topic or
using rotation to drive a trajectory on a line.
Therefore, for advanced driving, the traditional concept of "a line” is too limited because it only
represents a portion of the picture (the path you want the car's center of mass to travel around the
track). Expanding the concept of "the line" to include the rectangle defined by the car’s four contact
patches gives a much more complete picture of cornering because the constantly changing tire drift
angles influence both the orientation of the car (rectangle) relative to the line it’s following, and the
car’s actual direction of travel relative to the line.
Another important point is that the car’s trajectory determine’s how the energy from acceleration,
deceleration, and cornering forces move through the car's center of mass, which determines to what
extent the energy helps or hinders the cornering process. For example:
Ÿ Trying to accelerate hard out of a slow-speed turn with a trajectory that has the tail end hung way
out does not allow the acceleration force to push relatively directly and efficiently though the car’s
center of mass; instead the force tends to ‘spill’ in the direction of the drift, limiting how hard you
can accelerate without losing control of the energy and spinning the car.
Ÿ However, in a mid-speed sweeper, where cornering forces are high and acceleration forces are
lower, then if you tend to run out of track at the exit of the turn, it might be advantages to drive a
trajectory that hangs the tail out slightly, so the acceleration forces (which aren’t high enough to
push rear around) are put to work helping to push/drive the car away from the edge of the track.
Ÿ If your car is unstable (rotates into oversteer too easily) in a high-speed turn, then if the instability
comes entering the turn it might be advantages to take a more shallow trajectory into the turn (to
keep rotational momentum from building too quickly). If the instability is from the rotation point out,
then it might be advantages to manage the rotation amount by driving a trajectory that checks the
car’s rotation when it is at or near tangent to the line (by strategically removing front tire loads).
I believe that to extract the last bit of performance from a car/tack combination, a driver must
combine their (intuitive and/or intellectual) knowledge of concepts 2-5 to formulate a cornering plan
that allows for the driving of a trajectory for each corner (and each phase of the corner) that will
optimize performance to best meet the objectives for each turn. When creating a cornering plan:
Ÿ I determine the priority of the turn relative to lap times (e.g. does it lead onto a long straight), and
my specific objectives for each phase of the turn.
Ÿ I identify any special considerations for the corner, car, or conditions. For example, if camber,
elevation, or surface changes need to be considered. Or if the tires go off quickly, so using less
than optimum drift angles may be called for during the turn’s entry and/or exit phase.
Ÿ Then I identify where I want rotation to occur, and the rate and momentum of rotation needed to
produce an optimum trajectory out of the turn to meet the objectives and considerations above.
Ÿ Finally I determine the entry phase trajectory for the turn by determining the energy cycle I will
need to create to produce the outside front tire loading/traction that will make the car rotate where
and how I want it to.
The next two pages show some examples of how to manipulate rotation and trajectory:
I view 'Sensitivity' as a catch-all term for the multiple intertwined Basic Sensitivity Proess
Another way to free critical resources (and carve out even more sensitivity time per lap), is to
only ‘DO’ the most important actions in each turn and only analyze sensations that are not
already part of your mental model of the track. Back to the music analogy, when a guitarist rips
through a blazing fast riff, he is not investing attention on the playing of every note. He focuses
on the whole riff and the ‘key’ notes that help him get through the passage with the correct
timing and feel. The rest of (most of) the notes are played on autopilot, via mental and muscle
memory. Doing something similar in racing can free a huge amount of mental bandwidth.
For example if your plan for getting around a turn includes reference points for braking, turn-in,
apexing, throttle-on, and track-out, that’s a lot of stuff to ‘do’, and each ‘task’ you do shorten’s
the ‘rests’ needed for sensitivity. The braking and turn-in points are likely important to attend to
because they create the energy cycle that sets up the rest of the turn. However, if you are
reasonably familiar with the track/turn, for the rest of the turn, you can just trust in your mental
model of the track to know where you should be on the track, the speed you should be going,
the loads your tires should be carrying, and the trajectory you should be traveling.
So, if you get the braking and turn-in right, the rest of the turn should just happen automatically.
When you are in the ‘automatic’ portion of the turn, the only cognitive load is subconsciously
comparing what’s happening to what you expect (your plan for the turn). If things start going off
plan, then ‘you’ jump back in and start ‘doing’ stuff to get back on plan for the turn. Any time
that you can be in ‘automatic’ mode on track is time that you can relax, and focus on feeling
and observe what’s happening... and that is where the speed hides.
Click here for detailed information about the mental skills of analysis, recognition, mental models etc.
Turn Task Proactive Sensitivity & Sensitivity Focus - (no braking turn) Management Method
Entry Phase Focus on the turn-in point, then, based on the mental model of the track and plan Actively monitor the turn-in timing,
for the turn, focus on precisely executing the driving inputs required to create an then just observe the results of the
energy cycle for the outside front tire that will produce the entry trajectory and driving inputs and manually adjust if
rotation required to match the entry phase of the turn plan . needed to stay on plan for the turn.
Rotation Phase The corner plan includes the pre-defined driver inputs (throttle & steering), and Observe the rotation control inputs,
related timing, needed to manage the rotation to produce the optimum corner exit then just observe their results and
trajectory, so sensitivity focus in on executing these precisely. manually adjust if needed to stay on
plan.
Exit Phase The corner plan includes the optimum outside rear tire load and drift angle Observe how reality is matching the
throughout the turn’s exit phase, along with the steering and throttle inputs needed plan, with an extra focus on outside
to produce them, so again, focus is on executing the planned inputs precisely. rear tire load/drift for the first part of
the exit phase.
NOTE: The examples show the sensitivity types, as being separate things/processes, but in reality the different sensitivity
types are blended to optimize performance.
4 - Forces
Reactive (Acting on the Car) Directed
Sensitivity Sensitivity
(Mode/Range #1) (Mode/Range #4)
In this sensitivity range the In this sensitivity mode, the driver
driver can’t connect with the directs (or triggers) an automated
energy cycle’s earlier stages, series of precisely timed inputs to
so they focus almost entirely start, grow, and disperse an energy
on traction and the forces cycle that will produce the desired
acting on the car (especially results. Then, the energy cycle
rotation) while constantly and on-track results are
working to keep the car going monitored and verified as
in the right direction. (typical they unfold using pattern
for early-learning stage matching. (Typically only
drivers, or for higher level used by drivers at the
drivers when traction is highest learning stages
not predictable like on and in predictable
a wet or drying track.) conditions.)
3 - Traction 1 - Energy
(& Drift angle) Flow
Managed
Predictive Sensitivity
Sensitivity (Mode/Range #3)
(Mode/Range #2) In this sensitivity range the driver
In this sensitivity range the driver focuses on achieving specific driving
focuses almost entirely on: goals by managing the energy flow
2 - Tire portion of the energy cycle to produce
• For the lower learning stages, ‘feeling’ Loads the tire loads (the cause), that will
traction by analyzing their sensations. produce the desired traction & forces
(the effect). Pattern matching (against the
• For middle and high range learning stages, metal track model) is used to determine if
using the current holistic context (and their the energy cycle is growing as expected, and if
mental track map) to recognize traction everything is on target to meet the driving goals,
levels and predict traction trends. or if adjustments are needed to stay on target.
One of the biggest challenges that arose when writing this booklet was trying to explain holistic
concepts with language, which is by nature structured and sequential. The concepts had to be
unraveled and dissected to write about them (at least that’s the only way I could write it), but in reality
all of the concepts are interconnected; each one influences, and is influenced by, the others, just like
all driving inputs influence multiple things, while also being influenced by other factors such as
speed, the track, conditions, etc., so keep that in mind... “The map is not the terrain.”
When written out, I know that some of the concepts in this booklet might seem complex or confusing.
However, if you focus on the overall meaning/message of each concept (instead of getting bogged
down in the minutia when you first read it), and you try to think about your past driving experiences
while looking for examples of what the concepts are describing, then you may find that the concepts
do provide another perspective (or way of thinking about) what you felt when driving. If the overall
concepts make sense to you in the context of your experience, you can just go with that, and then
come back to this booklet later to dive into the details if you’re interested.
Another point I want to make is that, in my experience, once I became aware of the concepts in this
booklet, it took very little (if any) mental effort to ‘use’ them when driving. I’m not saying that, having
read them, the heavens will open, and a beam of light will envelop your car as it circles the track at
lap record pace. However, a light may go on in your head; you may find yourself ‘understanding’ what
you’re feeling on a deeper level, and you may begin to recognize the interconnectedness of the
whole driving process in a way that allows you to predict and control it on another level.
I realize that the idea of these abstract concepts actually improving your on-track performance might
sound like a fantasy or delusion. However, the first person I ever shared this information with was a
Sports Car Club of America ‘Spec Racer Ford’ driver who had already been racing for two seasons,
had done many hundreds of laps of testing, and had private instruction from ‘big name’ coaches, but
he was still stuck at 6+ seconds off the pace. We emailed for about two months, discussing the more
foundational information that’s available on my website, and at his next race (held at his worst track)
he took 3 seconds off his best time, and felt comfortable and consistent doing those times. Over the
season, we talked about, and he applied, the concepts in this booklet, and at the end of the season,
he was lapping 0.5 seconds under the lap record at his favorite track. Of course, that’s no guarantee,
and everyone is different, so while these concepts may work for some, they may not for others.
At any rate, I wish you artful driving, and successful and rewarding racing wherever you compete!
___________________________________________________
“The mind, once stretched by a new idea, never returns to its original dimensions.”
- Ralph Waldo Emerson